HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-10-18; Planning Commission; Resolution 48461
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4846
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SITE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 71
UNIT ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY ON
2.20 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CARLSBAD
VILLAGE DRIVE AND WEST OF HIGHLAND DRIVE IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: AEGIS OF CARLSBAD
CASE NO.: SDP 00-14
WHEREAS, Aegis Assisted Living LLC., “Developer”, has tiled a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Hoyt S. Pardee, “Owner”,
described as
That portion of Tract 119 of Carlsbad Lands, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to map thereof No. 1661, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, March 1,1915.
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development
Plan as shown on Exhibits “A” - “K” dated October 18, 2000, on tile in the Planning
Department, AEGIS OF CARLSBAD - SDP 00-14 as provided by Chapter 21.06Section
21.53.120 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 18th day of October, 2000,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Site Development Plan .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
t
;
f
5
lf
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1s
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission APPROVES AEGIS OF CARLSBAD - SDP 00 -14 based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental
settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will
not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which
the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or
traffic circulation, in that the assisted living facility will provide necessary housing for
elderly residents requiring assistance with daily living needs in an existing
residential neighborhood with community services in close proximity to the site for
the convenience of residents. The facility is small in scale and designed to be
compatible with surrounding single and multi-family residential development.
That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in
that the proposed buildings will meet all setback requirements; building coverage is 31
percent of the lot whereas the zone provides for up to a maximum of 60 percent; 34
percent of the site will be landscaped and include passive outdoor recreational
amenities.
That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust
the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be
provided and maintained, in that the proposed small scale development and building
design is compatible with surrounding development. The project provides typical
setbacks, driveway access and parking, as well as landscaping and passive
recreational amenities. The southern setback will provide a buffer for adjacent single-
family residences and includes a passive landscaped pedestrian walk.
That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic
generated by the proposed use, in that required road improvements in accordance with
the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan to Carlsbad Village Drive along the
project’s frontages ensure that the roadway will operate at acceptable levels through
build-out. Two points of ingress/egress to the site from Carlsbad Village Drive will
reduce potential traffic conflicts on the street.
Conditions:
1. All of the conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4847 for CUP 00-05 are
applicable and incorporated herein by reference.
2. This approval is granted subject to the approval of CUP 00-05 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4847 for those other
approvals.
3. A four foot screen fence shall be located on top of the two foot retaining wall along
the western and southwestern property lines. The fence design shall be subject to
Planning Director review and approval.
PC RESO NO. 4846 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. The tower elements shall be limited to a maximum 35 foot height above finished
floor.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PC RESO NO. 4846 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of October 2000, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Baker, L’Heureux, Nielsen,
Segall, and Trigas
NOES:
ABSENT: Commissioner Heineman
ABSTAIN:
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOL&IILL&
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4846 -4-