HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-05-02; Planning Commission; Resolution 49651
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4965
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDlNG
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT OF COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER CDP 97-43 TO
SUBDIVIDE 174 ACRES INTO 171 LOTS ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CANNON ROAD AND
EAST OF FARADAY AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 8.
CASE NAME: KELLY RANCH
CASE NO.: CDP 97-43 (A)
WHEREAS, The Kelly Land Company, “Developer and Owner”, has filed a
verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
A portion of Lot “I” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda and a portion
of Lot “F” of Ran&o Agua Hedionda, all in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to the map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, November 16,1896.
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission approved Local Coastal
Program Amendment LCPA 97-09 with modifications on July 11,200O; and
WHEREAS, this Coastal Development Permit Amendment is necessary
for the Kelly Ranch project to be consistent with the Local Coastal Program as
amended by the Coastal Commission action on July 11,200O and LCPA 97-09(A) by the
City of Carlsbad which incorporates the Coastal Commission’s suggested
modifications; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal
Development Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibits “A” - “M” dated May 2,200l on file in
the Planning Department, KELLY RANCH, CDP 97-43(A), as provided by Chapter 21.201.040
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 2nd day of May, 2001, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Coastal Development Permit Amendment; and,
WHEREAS, on the 7th day of April, 1999, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of CDP 97-43 as described and conditioned in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 4499; and,
WHEREAS, on the 11th day of May, 1999, the City Council approved CDP
97-43 as described and conditioned in City Council Resolution No. 99-162; and,
WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission approved LCPA 97-09 with
suggested modifications which required project design revisions; and
WHEREAS, this resolutions findings and conditions shall supercede the
findings and conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4499; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That CDP 97-43(A) shall amend and supercede CDP 97-43
Cl That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of KELLY RANCH, CDP 97-43(A), based on
the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Local Coastal Program as
amended by LCPA 97-09(A) and all applicable policies in that the proposed project is
in compliance with all of the development standards of the underlying zone as
shown on Exhibits “A”-‘(M)’ dated May 2, 2001, the proposed residential density is
within the density range established by the Mello II segment, and is consistent with
the intent of the individual policies of the applicable Local Coastal Program overlay
zones.
PC RESO NO. 4965 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
That the project is designed to include erosion and water quality control as specified
in Section 21.203.040(B)(4)(j) of the Coastal Resource Protection overlay zone
policy.
That the project protects steep slopes within Kelly Ranch Open Space, has
minimized onsite paving, and prepared a Fire Suppression Plan per Section
21.203.040 (A) (2) (a-g) of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone.
That grading is restricted to be accomplished between April 1 and October 1 of each
year not withstanding the ability to extend the grading period to November 15 per
Section 21.203.040 (B) (4) of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone.
That the project includes measures for scenic preservation including setbacks,
landscape, low intensity building colors, and limited building height per Section
21.203.040 (G) of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone.
The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3
of the Coastal Act in that the project includes public access to vista points and does not
prohibit access to the Agua Hedionda Lagoon or to the Pacific Ocean.
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Couditious:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to Final Map.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Coastal Development Permit Amendment.
2,
3.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer or their successors to
make, all corrections and modifications to the document(s) necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits “A’‘-“MI’ dated May 2,
2001. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an
amendment to this approval.
Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4965 [CDP 97-43(A)] voids and
supersedes Planning Commission Resolution No. 4499 (CDP 97-43) and shall
become effective upon concurrence by the California Coastal Commission with the
Executive Director’s report of acceptance of the suggested modifications for
PC RESO NO. 4965 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Carlsbad LCPA Z-99D [reference Carlsbad LCPA 97-09(A)] as submitted by the
City of Carlsbad.
The Developer or their successors shall apply for and be issued grading permits for
this subdivision within two (2) years of recordation of the final map for CT 97-16 or
this Coastal Development Permit will expire unless extended per Section 21.201.210
of the Zoning Ordinance.
A grading permit issued by the City Engineer consistent with all City grading
policies and ordinances is required. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
Developer or their successors shall apply for and obtain a grading permit issued by
the City Engineer
All construction activities shall be planned so that grading will occur in units that
can be easily completed within the summer construction season. All grading
operations shall be limited to be between April 1 and October 1 of each year. All
areas disturbed by grading shall be planted within 60 days of initial disturbance and
prior to October 1 with temporary or permanent (in the case of finished slopes)
erosion control methods. The October 1 grading season deadline may be extended
with the approval of the City Engineer subject to implementation by October 1 of
erosion control measures designed to prohibit discharge of sediments off-site during
and after the grading operation is completed. Extensions beyond November 15 may
be allowed in areas of very low risk of impact to sensitive coastal resources.
If any of the responsible Resource Agencies prohibit grading operations during the
summer grading period in order to protect endangered or rare species or sensitive
environmental resources, then grading activities may be allowed during the winter.
Storm drain facilities consistent with the Master Drainage Plan shall be installed as
required by the City Engineer.
Soil erosion control practices shall be used against “onsite” soil erosion to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Offsite drainage shall be prevented through sediment control. Control methods
shall be shown on the grading plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of CT 97-16(A) and HDP 97-17(A) and
is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4963
and 4964 for those other approvals
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions.
If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and tile the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
PC RESO NO. 4965 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of May 2001, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Compas, Heineman,
L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Trigas
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JEF&E& SEGAI&-& air-person
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HO%MILtiR
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4965 -5.