HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-05-02; Planning Commission; Resolution 4969II I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4969
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT FOR COASTAL.
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CDP 98-70 FOR 147 RESIDENTIAL
LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
CANNON ROAD AND EAST OF FARADAY AVENUE IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8.
CASE NAME: KELLY RANCH
CASE NO.: CDP 98-70(A)
WHEREAS, Shea Homes, “Developer,” has filed a verified application with the
City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Kelly Land Company, “Owner,” described as
A portion of Lot “I” of Ran&o Agua Hedionda and a portion
of Lot “F” of Ranch0 Agua Hedionda all in the City of
Carlshad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to map thereof No. 823, Bled in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, November 16,1896.
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission approved Local Coastal
Program Amendment LCPA 97-09 with modifications on July 11,200O; and
WHEREAS, this Coastal Development Permit Amendment is necessary
for the Kelly Ranch project to he consistent with the Local Coastal Program as
amended by the Coastal Commission action on July 11,200O and LCPA 97-09(A) by the
City of Carlshad which incorporates the Coastal Commission’s suggested
modifications; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal
Development Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibits “BB” - “DD” and “Jl”-“J12” and
“11”-“IlO” dated May 2, 2001, on tile in the Planning Department, KELLY RANCH - CDP
98-70(A) as provided by Chapter 21.201.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 2nd day of May 2001, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Coastal Development Permit Amendment; and,
WHEREAS, on the 7th day of July, 1999 the Planning Commission approved
CDP 98-70 as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4561.
WHEREAS, the findings and conditions of this resolution shall supercede the
findings and conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4561.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of KELLY RANCH - CDP 98-70(A) based on
the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal
Program and all applicable policies in that the proposed project is in compliance with
all of the development standards of the underlying zone as shown on Exhibits “BB”-
“DD” dated May 2, 2001, the proposed residential density is within the density
range established by the Mello II segment, and is consistent with the intent of the
individual policies of the applicable Local Coastal Program overlay zones.
That the project is designed to include erosion and water quality control as specified
in Section 21.203.040(B)(4)(j) of the Coastal Resource Protection overlay zone
polky
That the project protects steep slopes within Kelly Ranch Open Space, has
minimized onsite paving, and is conditioned to prepare a Fire Suppression Plan per
Section 21.203.040 (A) (2) (a-g) of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone.
That grading is restricted to be accomplished between April 1 and October 1 of each
year not withstanding the ability to extend the grading period per Section
21.203.040 (B) (4) of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone.
That the project includes measures for scenic preservation including setbacks,
landscape, low intensity building colors, and limited building beight per Section
21.203.040 (G) of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone.
The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3
of the Coastal Act in that the project includes public access to vista points and does not
prohibit access to the Agua Hedionda Lagoon or to the Pacific Ocean.
PC BESO NO. 4969 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to Final Map.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or tiher condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Coastal Development Permit Amendment.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer or their successors to
make, all corrections and modifications to the documents, as necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
The Developer or their successors shall apply for and be issued building permits for
this project within two (2) years of recordation of the final map for CT 97-16 or this
coastal development permit will expire unless extended per Section 21.201.210 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer or their successors shall
apply for and obtain a grading permit issued by the City Engineer.
All construction activities shall he planned so that grading will occur in units that
can be easily completed within the summer construction season. AI1 grading
operations shall he limited to be between April 1 and October 1 of each year. All
areas disturbed by grading shall be planted within 60 days of initial disturbance and
prior to October 1 with temporary or permanent (in the case of finished slopes)
erosion control methods. The October 1 grading season deadline may be extended
with the approval of the City Engineer subject to implementation by October 1 of
erosion control measures designed to prohibit discharge of sediments off-site during
and after the grading operation is completed. Extensions beyond November 15 may
be allowed in areas of very low risk of impact to sensitive coastal resources.
If any of the responsible Resource Agencies prohibit grading operations during the
summer grading period in order to protect endangered or rare species or sensitive
environmental resources, then grading activities may be allowed during the winter.
PC RESO NO. 4969 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6.
I.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Storm drain facilities consistent with the Master Drainage Plan shall be installed as
required by the City Engineer.
Soil erosion control practices shall be used against “onsite” soil erosion to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Offsite drainage shall he prevented through sediment control. Control methods
shall be shown on the grading plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer or their successors shall
obtain approval of a fire suppression plan consistent with the Mello II segment of
the Local Coastal Program from the Carlshad Fire Department.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer or their successors shall
obtain approval of a landscape management plan consistent with the requirements
of 21.203.040(H) from the Planning Director.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer or their successors shall
obtain approval of a Public Education Program consistent with the requirements of
21.203.040(B)(4)(j) from the Planning Director.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of SDP 98-04(A) and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4968 for those other
approvals.
Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4969 [CDP 98-70(A)] voids and
supersedes Planning Commission Resolution No. 4561 (CDP 98-70) and shall
become effective upon concurrence by the California Coastal Commission with the
Executive Director’s report of acceptance of the suggested modifications for
Carlsbad LCPA 2-99D [reference Carlsbad LCPA 97-09(A)] as submitted by the
City of Carlsbad.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PC RESO NO. 4969 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of May 2001, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Compas, Heineman,
L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Trigas
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4969 -5.