Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-05-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 51441 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5144 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAEUSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR 20 HOTEL UNITS AND 1,600 SQUARE FEET OF MEETING SPACE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5805 ARMADA DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 13. CASE NAME: GRAND PACIFIC PALISADES RESORT CASE NO.: CDP 96-02(B) WHEREAS, Grand Pacific Palisades, LLC, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a AMENDMENT CDP 96-02(B) TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as Lot 14 of Carlsbad Tract No. 92-07 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 13215, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on June 30,1995. (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal Development Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibit “A” dated May 15, 2002, on file in the Planning Department, GRAND PACIFIC PALISADES RESORT - CDP 96-02@) as provided by Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of May 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2000, the City Council approved CDP 96-02(A), as described and conditioned in City Council Resolution No. 2000-181. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing axid considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the CDP. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of GRAND PACIFIC PALISADES RESORT - CDP 96-02(B) based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findinw: 1. That the findings of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4733 apply and are incorporated by this reference. 2. That there is no change of circumstances in relation to coastal resources per Section 13169 of the California Code of Regulations since the original granting of the permit. Conditions: 1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Grand Pacific Palisades Resort Coastal Development Permit documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the ~ ~ final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the ~ approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval ~ 2. That all of the conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4733 apply and are incorporated by this reference, except as modified below. 3. The following condition shall be added to Planning Commission Resolution No 4732: Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit FOR city approval a “Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The SWPP shall address measures to reduce to the maximum extent possible storm water pollutant runoff at both construction and post-construction phases of the project. At a minimum, the Plan shall: A. Identifjl existing and post-development on-site pollutants; B. Recommend source control Best Management Practices (BMPs) to filter said C. Establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special consideration and effort shall be applied to employee and customer education on the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants. pollutants; D. Ensure long-term maintenance of all post construction BMPs in perpetuity. E. Identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities for a 10-year, 6-hour storm event. If maintaining post-development rates at pre-development levels cannot be achieved, adequate justification subject to the City Engineer’s approval must be provided. PC RES0 NO. 5 144 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Condition No. 11 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4733 shall be replaced with the following: The applicant shall apply for and be issued building permits for this project prior to June 6, 2005 or this Coastal Development Permit will expire unless extended per Section 21.201.210 of the Zoning Ordinance. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days fiom date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. ... ... ... .. . PC RES0 NO. 5 144 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of May 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Heineman, Segall, and White NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Dominguez and Whitton ABSTAIN: None SEENA TFUGAS, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RES0 NO. 5 144 -4-