Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-02-19; Planning Commission; Resolution 53561 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5356 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE SEWAGE LIFT STATION ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF CANNON ROAD WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8. CASE NAME: CANNON ROAD LIFT STATION CASE NO.: SDP 02-17 WHEREAS, Carlsbad Municipal Water District, “Developer,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by the City of Carlsbad, “Owner,” described as DEVELOPMENT PLAN SDP 02-17 TO ALLOW A PERMANENT Lots 82 and 171 of Map No. 14340 (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development Plan as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - ‘IF” dated January 15, 2003, on file in the Planning Department, CANNON ROAD LIFI’ STATION - SDP 02-17 as provided by Chapter 2 1.06/Section 2 1.53.120 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of January, 2003, and on the 19th day of February, 2003, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Site Development Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission APPROVES CANNON ROAD LIFT STATION - SDP 02-17 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findinps: 1. 2. 3. 4. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that a) the proposed permanent lift station is located and designed to fit into the surrounding uses and will be architecturally compatible with nearby homes; b) the use is allowed by the City's General Plan and implements the goals and objectives of the General Plan as discussed in the staff report for the project; and, c) any effects of the proposed lift station (odor, noise) which might have made the proposed use detrimental to the nearby neighborhood have been reduced to an imperceptible level by the inclusion of odor and noise control equipment incorporated into the design of the lift station. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in that the project site can accommodate the proposed project and its associated access aisle while preserving all necessary vehicular sight distances along Cannon Road and providing access for maintenance vehicles. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained, in that a) the nature of the use makes it exempt from the development standards of the underlying R-3-Q Zone; b) the project will be set approximately 30' back from Cannon Road; c) a maintenance access way will be provided; d) the proposed 24' high structure will comply with the 30' height limitation of the R-3-Q Zone; e) the project will include a vinyl-coated chain link fence at the sides of the structure; f) the site will be landscaped; and, g) the facility has been designed to incorporate odor and noise control features. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that Cannon Road is a major arterial roadway which will be able to accommodate up to 40,000 vehicles per day and the proposed project will generate approximately 1 ADT. Conditions: Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of building permits. 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of CUP 02-11 and CDP 02-22 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5343 (Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program), 5344 (CUP 02-11) and 5345 (CDP 02-22) for those other approvals incorporated herein by reference. PC RES0 NO. 5356 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days fiom date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of February, 2003, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Heineman, Montgomery, Segall, White, and Whitton NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Dominguez ABSTAIN: None r\n ATTEST: Planning Director PC RES0 NO. 5356 -3-