Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-04-02; Planning Commission; Resolution 53851 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5385 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CDP 02-33 TO ALLOW AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING OF THE CO-LOCATION OF THREE PANEL ANTENNAS ON A MONO-PALM STRUCTURE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT AREA ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 4901 EL CAMINO REAL IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1. CASE NAME: TAMARACK VERTZON CASE NO.: CDP 02-33 WHEREAS, Verizon Wireless, “Developer,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Jay Franklin Hoffman and Maryon Dooley Hoffman, “Owner,” described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 3451, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, filed January 31,1975, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, and that portion of Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map No. 3451 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, as shown on Parcel Map filed on page 3451 of Parcel Maps on January 31,1975, under file No. 75-023997 (APN 207-101-24 & 28) (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal Development Permit as shown on Exhibits “A” - “E” dated April 2,2003,on file in the Planning Department, TAMARACK VERIZON - CDP 02-33 as provided by Chapter 21.201.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 2nd day of April, 2003, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the CDP. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES TAMARACK VEFUZON - CDP 02-33 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Mello I1 Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) and all applicable policies in that no sensitive resources, geologic instability, flood hazard, or coastal access opportunities exist on site and the development does not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-way or otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastline. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act in that the project is located outside of the coastal shoreline development overlay zone. Therefore, compliance with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act is not required. The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.03 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the proposed co- location on the mono-palm is a “stealth” design which will blend in with the natural view shed; no steep slopes will be affected by the project and no native vegetation is located on the subject property; and the site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods or liquefaction. The project is not located in the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone, according to Map X of the Land Use Plan, certified September 1990 and, Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fees are not required in accordance with the provisions of the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.202 of the Zoning Ordinance). The project is not located between the sea and the first public road parallel to the sea and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions of the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.204 of the Zoning Ordinance). Conditions: 1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Conditional Use Permit document(s) necessary to make them PC RES0 NO. 5385 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 2. The applicant shall apply for and be issued building permits for this project within two (2) years of approval or this coastal development permit will expire unless extended per Section 21.201.210 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 3. This approval is granted subject to the approval of CUP 02-18 and SUP 02-02 and is subject to all conditions contained in Resolutions No. 5383 and 5384 for those other approvals incorporated herein by reference. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. ... ... ... ... PC RES0 NO. 5385 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of April, 2003, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery, White, and Whitton NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Segall ABSTAIN: None R, Chairperson COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RES0 NO. 5385 -4-