HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-05-17; Planning Commission; Resolution 60851 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6085
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF A
NONRESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO
4 SUBDIVIDE A 13.98-ACRE SITE DEVELOPED WITH
5 28 BUILDINGS TOTALING 203,808 SQUARE FEET INTO
28 AIRSPACE NONRESIDENTIAL UNITS ON PROPERTY
6 GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF EAGLE DRIVE
7 IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: GREYHAWK BUSINESS PARK
8 CASE NO.: PUD 05-17
9
WHEREAS, Hofman Planning Associates, "Developer," has filed a verified
10
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Greyhawk Associates,
j2 "Owner," described as
13 Lot 5 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-06, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, According to the
14 Map Thereof No. 14831, Filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, June 29, 2004, as file
No. 2004-0606935 of official records
16
("the Property"); and
17
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Non-Residential18
in Planned Unit Development Permit as shown on Exhibits "A" - "H" dated May 17,2006, on file
20 in the Planning Department GREYHAWK BUSINESS PARK - PUD 05-17 as provided by
21 Chapter 21.47 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
22 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of May 2006, hold a
23
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
24
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
£*J
25 and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
27 relating to the Non-Residential Planned Development Permit.
28
1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
3
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
<- B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
APPROVES GREYHAWK BUSINESS PARK - PUD 05-17, based on the
6 following findings and subject to the following conditions:
7 Findings;
8 1. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with the code,
„ the general plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all adopted plans of the city
and other governmental agencies in that the proposed project is consistent with the
10 Planned Industrial (PI) General Plan Land Use designation and all development
standards of the Planned Industrial (P-M) Zone and Title 20 and 21 regulations
11 governing subdivisions and the design of nonresidential planned developments.
12 2. The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a service
13 or facility, which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the
community in that the proposed nonresidential planned development will be located
14 on an existing P-M zoned lot. The project will be compatible with the surrounding
office and industrial uses and the McClellan-Palomar Airport, and will provide
15 opportunities for employment of local residents.
3. Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons
17 residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity in that the project meets all applicable city standards and ordinances,
18 including the McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and all
public facilities and services will be extended to the site. Adequate access to the site
will be provided via Palomar Airport Road and Eagle Drive. The subdivision
20 includes all necessary features to be compatible with surrounding development.
The nonresidential planned development will not pose a safety hazard to the
21 occupants of the industrial zone.
79^ 4. In granting a nonresidential planned development permit, the City Council, the Planning
23 Commission, or the Planning Director may modify the plan or impose such conditions as
it deems necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare.
24
5. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
25 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
27
28
PC RESO NO. 6085 -2-
Conditions;
2 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to recordation of
3 the final map.
^ 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
5 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
6 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy
7 issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the
property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
9 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Non-Residential Planned
Development Permit.
10
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Non-Residential Planned Development Permit documents, as
12 necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on
the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits.
13 Any proposed development different from this approval shall require an amendment to
this approval.
14
1 - 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
16
4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
17 of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are
challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid
in unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
20
5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold
21 harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
„ representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly
23 or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Non-Residential Planned
Development Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
24 discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and
(c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby,
including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the
26 facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions.
27 6. This approval is granted subject to the approval of CT 05-21 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6084 for those other
approvals incorporated herein by reference.
PC RESO NO. 6085 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa,
Dominguez, Segall, and Whitton
NOES:
ABSENT: Commissioner Heineman
ABSTAIN:
B. MONTGOMERY,JCT&irperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMlftfsiON
DON NEU
Assistant Planning Director
PCRESONO. 6085 -4-