Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-11-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 61871 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6187 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 3 THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOM- MENDING ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE 4 DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND , REPORTING PROGRAM FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA 04-12) TO CHANGE THE PROPERTY'S 6 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW MEDIUM DENSITY (RLM) AND 7 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) TO RESIDEN- TIAL HIGH DENSITY (RH), RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM- 8 HIGH DENSITY (RMH), AND OPEN SPACE (OS); A ZONE o CHANGE (ZC 04-08) TO CHANGE THE PROPERTY'S ZONING FROM LIMITED CONTROL (LC) TO 10 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY-MULTIPLE (RD-M) AND OPEN SPACE (OS); A LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT 11 (LCPA 04-11) TO CHANGE THE COASTAL PROGRAM LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS TO BE 12 CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND 13 ZONING; A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (CT 04-10), CONDO- MINIUM PERMIT (CP 05-05), HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT 14 PERMIT (HDP 04-05), SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SDP 04-07), COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (CDP 04-23), 15 AND HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN PERMIT ., (HMPP 06-08) FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF 20.4 ACRES INTO FIVE LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 17 AND CONSTRUCTION OF 60 TOWNHOME CONDO- MINIUMS AND 30 STACKED-FLAT CONDOMINIUMS ON 18 PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CASSIA ROAD AND POINSETTIA LANE 19 IN THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL 20 PROGRAM AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 21. 21 CASE NAME: POINSETTIA PLACE CASE NO.: GPA 04-12/ZC 04-08/LCPA 04-11/CT 04-10/ 22 CP 05-05/HDP 04-05/SDP 04-07/CDP 04-237 HMPP 06-08 £3 24 WHEREAS, Sierra Linda Development Company, "Developer," has filed a 25 verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Carlsbad Poinsettia 2^ Land Company, a California Limited Liability Co., "Owner," described as 27 The north half of the southwest quarter of the southwest 28 quarter of Section 23, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof 1 ("the Property"); and 2 WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with 3 said project; and4 <- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 15th day of November, 2006, 6 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 7 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony o and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and 9 considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors 10 relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 13 Commission as follows: 14 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 15 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning 16 Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Exhibit "MND," 17 according to Exhibits "NOI" dated April 7, 2006, and "PII" dated March 21, 2006, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: 18 Findings; 20 1 • The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find: 21 a. it has reviewed, analyzed, and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Poinsettia Place and the 22 environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project; and Z*J 24 b. the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California 25 Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and 26 27 c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad; and 28 d. based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. PCRESONO. 6187 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of November, 2006, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Vice Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Cardosa, Dominguez, and Whitton NOES: Commissioner Segall ABSENT: Chairperson Montgomery and Commissioner Heineman ABSTAIN: JULIE BACKER, Vice Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: DON NEU Assistant Planning Director PCRESONO.6187 -3-