HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-02-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 68665
^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6866
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
4 INCIDENTAL TAKE OF SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR THE
RANCHO MILAGRO PROJECT, ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF-
6 MILE NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLEGE
BOULEVARD AND EL CAMINO REAL, IN THE SUNNY
7 CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 191) AND LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 15.
CASE NAME: RANCHO MILAGRO
9 CASE NO: HMP 09-01
10 WHEREAS, Warren C. LyaU, "Developer," has filed a verified application with
^ ^ the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by LyaU Enterprises, Inc., "Owner," described
12
as:
13
Remainder Parcel "A" of Carlsbad Tract 96-02 according to
14 map thereof No. 11242, flled in the offlce of the County
Recorder of San Diego County on October 27, 2000 aU in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of CaUfornia, and
"K" Street Remamder Parcels of Carlsbad Tract 00-18
("the Property"); and
15
16
17
18
19 WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has received authorization to issue permits to
20 impact various sensitive species and habitats, including species listed as Threatened or
21 Endangered, by virtue of Incidental Take Permit No. TE022606-0 from the U.S. Fish and
22
Wildlife Service and Natural Communify Conservation Planning Permit No. 2835-2004-001-05;
23
and
24
WHEREAS, the authority stated above is based on a plan titied Habitat
25 Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad, Final Approval November
27 9, 2004, referred to as the HMP, and approval of all projects is contingent on a finding of
28 consistency with the HMP; and
WHEREAS, said verified application by Developer constitutes a request for a
Habitat Management Plan Permit pursuant to the City's authority as contained in Chapter
21.210 of the Zoning Ordinance, on file in the Planning Division; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on February 15, 2012, consider said
6 request; and
7 WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Habitat Management Plan Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
9
10
11
12
13 A) That the foregoing recitations are tme and correct.
14 B) That the RANCHO MILAGRO project is consistent with the HMP as described
15
25
in the following findings.
16 C) That based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Commission
APPROVES the Habitat Management Plan Permit, HMP 09-01, for RANCHO
17 MILAGRO based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
i;
19 Findings:
20 1. That the Rancho Milagro project site is shown in Figure 28 of the approved HMP as a
"Proposed Standards Area".
21
22 2. That authorization to impact sensitive habitats through the removal of 0.05 acres of
Southern Willow Scrub (Group A), 0.02 acres of Sycamore/Oak Woodland (Group
23 A), 2.56 acres of Unoccupied Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub/Disturbed Diegan Coastal
Sage Scrub (Group D), 0.02 acres of Coast Live Oak Woodland (Group A), 2.50
24 acres of Non-Native Grassland (Group E), and 11.83 acres of Agricultural Land
(Group F) is subject to continuous compliance with all provisions of the Habitat
Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP), the Citywide
26 Incidental Take Permit issued for the HMP, the Implementing Agreement, the Terms and
Conditions of the Incidental Take Permit, and the Biological Opinion.
27
3. That authorization to impact sensitive habitats is subject to confinuous compliance with
all mifigafion measures as stated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program and Addendum, GPA 06-03, ZC 06-02, CT 06-
PC RESO NO. 6866 -2-
04, SUP 06-05, and HDP 06-01 and is subject to all conditions contained in Plaiming
2 Commission Resolufions No. 6860, 6861, 6862, 6863, 6864, and 6865 for those other
approvals, including but not limited to recordation of conservation easements over all
3 conserved areas and management and monitoring in perpetuity by a qualified
conservation enfity.
4
5
11
4. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
6 a. it has reviewed, analyzed, and considered Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Addendum for RANCHO
7 MILAGRO - GPA 06-03, ZC 06-02, CT 06-04, SUP 06-05, HDP 06-01, and HMP
09-01, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and said
comments thereon, and the Program, on file in the Planning Division, prior to
9 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL ofthe project; and
10 b. the Mitigated Negafive Declarafion and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program and Addendum have been prepared in accordance with requirements of the
Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the Environmental
12 Protecfion Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and
13 c. they reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad; and
14
J ^ d. based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, the Planning Commission, finds that
there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the
16 environment.
1^ 5. That authorization to impact sensitive habitats is subject to continuous compliance with
the provisions of Volumes I, II and III of the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program and
the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for Threatened
19 and Endangered Species Due to Urban Growth within the Multiple Habitat Conservation
Program Planning Area (SCH No. 93121073).
20"
21
22
7. That the project design as approved by the City of Carlsbad has avoided and minimized
23 impacts to wildlife habitat and species of concem to the maximum extent practicable in
that the residential development is clustered on the least environmentally sensitive
24 portions of the site in an area historically used for agricultural production; provides
2^ a 100 foot buffer from wetlands; the bridge crossing over the northern drainage is
aUgned to cross at the narrowest section of the southern willow scrub and wiU
26 consist of a Con-Span or similar three-sided 12-foot (width) by 5-foot (height)
product type that wUI span a 75 foot long section of the creek whUe maintaining a
27 soft soil bottom to allow for natural flow of the creek beneath the crossing; sensitive
2^ upland and wetland habitats wiU be preserved in perpetuity in open space
conservation Lots 20, 21, 23, and 24 via a biological conservation easement; and
mitigation measures have been included which prevent negative effects on the
PC RESO NO. 6866 -3-
6. That all impacts to habitat and all take of species will be incidental to otherwise lawful
activities related to constmcfion and operation of the RANCHO MILAGRO project.
^ adjacent sensitive habitat and open space conservation lots which include: flre
2 management; erosion control; landscaping; fencing, signage, and Ughting; and
predator and exotic species control.
3
That adequate funding has been provided to address changed circumstances and adaptive
4 management needs that may be reasonably anticipated in the future, consistent with the
^ HMP Implementing Agreement.
5 9. That the authorization to impact sensitive habitats as a result of the project will not
appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the species in the wild due
7 to compliance with all of the above stated requirements, as well as ongoing monitoring
and reporting to the wildlife agencies and the public.
9 10. The Planning Commission hereby finds that all development in Carlsbad benefits from
the Habitat Management Plan, which is a comprehensive conservation plan and
10 implementafion program that will facilitate the preservation of biological diversity and
provide for effective protection and conservation of wildlife and plant species while
^ ^ confinuing to allow compafible development in accordance with Carlsbad's Growth
12 Management Plan. Preservafion of wildlife habitats and sensitive species is required by
the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City's General Plan which provides for
13 the realization of the social, economic, aesthefic and enviromnental benefits from the
preservation of open space within an increasingly urban environment. Moreover, each
14 new development will contribute to the need for additional regional infrastmcture that, in
tum, will adversely impact species and habitats. The In-Lieu Mitigation Fee imposed on
all new development within the City is essential to fund implementation of the City's
15 Habitat Management Plan.
15
17 HMP flndings regarding Zone 15 Planning Standards:
11. 67% of coastal sage scmb shall be conserved overall (emphasis added) within the
IP Standards Areas, as well as 75% of gnatcatchers. Some zones may conserve more or less
than these percentages due to parcel size, location, resources, or long-term conservation
20 potential (HMP, Standards Area, pg. D-73), in that this is a citywide preservation
standard and applies to many other properties than just the subject property. Upon
21 final preserve assembly, the City is responsible for ensuring that there was 67yo
22 preservation of CSS within aU Standards Areas. The Rancho MUagro project is
proposing impacts to 2.56 acres (30%) of the existing 8.51 acres of unoccupied
23 Diegan coastal sage scrub/ Disturbed Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub on-site, resulting in
5.95 acres (70%) remaining to be preserved in open space. In compliance with this
24 requirement, the proposed project has been designed to preserve 70% of the existing
coastal sage scrub on-site and; therefore, contributes its fair share of CSS
preservation to the overall citywide standard.
26
In addition, the project is mitigating its 2.56 acre impact as discussed above at a 1:1
27 ratio through on-site creation of 2.94 acres of CSS, which wiU occur through the
conversion of 1.50 acres of agricultural land, 0.04 acres of developed land, and 1.40
28 acres of non-native grasslands within the northern open space lots (Lots 23 and 24).
PC RESO NO. 6866 -4-
11
^ The proposed 2.94 acre restoration when added to the 5.95 acres being preserved
2 wiU result in a net gain of total CSS on-site.
3 12. Maintain and enhance a habitat linkage across Linkage Area C and adjoining portions of
Core Areas 3 and 5 that average between 500 and 1,000 feet wide, with a minimum width
4 of no less than 500 feet. Emphasis should be on improving gnatcatcher habitat within the
^ linkage (HMP, Zone 15 Planning Standards, pg. D-79), in that this standard is not
applicable to the Rancho MUagro project, since the project site is not within
6 Linkage Area C, nor is it within the adjoining portions of Core Areas 3 and 5.
7 As additional information, there is a finger shaped portion of Core Area 5 present
^ within the southern half of the project site that primarUy encompasses the Agua
Hedionda Creek riparian corridor. This is not directly a part of the habitat linkage
9 between Core Area 3, Linkage Area C, and Core Area 5, but does serve to increase
the open space protection of Core Area 5. With the exception of approximately 1.9
10 acres that are clustered on the northern and western edges of the portion of Core
Area 5, the project proposes to maintain aU of this as preserved open space. In fact,
the southern 16.3 acres of this area is predominately riparian habitat and was
12 previously dedicated as open space to mitigate for wetland/riparian impacts from
the adjacent Terraces at Sunny Creek project. The additional open space that will
13 be added from the proposed project within Core Area 5 includes 3.67 acres of
coastal sage scrub, which would increase the amount of potential gnatcatcher
14 habitat within this core area. In addition to the portion of the site within Core Area
5, the northeastem corner of the site abuts Linkage Area C. This northem area wUl
be maintained as open space, including 1.21 acres of existing coastal sage scrub, and
15 wiU be restored to include an additional 2.94 acres of coastal sage scrub and 0.21
acre of riparian habitat, which further connects the Linkage Area C through
17 hardline open space to Cantarini Ranch to the north.
13. Areas of upland habitat outside of the designated Linkage Area C may be taken in
IP exchange for restoration and enhancement inside the linkage, as long as the result is no
net loss of coastal sage scmb and the associated gnatcatcher population within the
20 southem portion of the zone (HMP, Zone 15 Plarming Standards, pg. D-79), in that the
project site is not within Linkage Area C and thus impacts to coastal sage scrub are
21 mitigated on-site as to meet the no-net-loss standard. Impacts to 2.56 acres of
22 coastal sage scrub wiU be mitigated through the preservation of 5.95 acres of coastal
sage scrub within the total project ownership and the conversion of 2.94 acres of
23 agricultural fields, developed land, and non-native grassland to coastal sage scrub
within the northern open space lots.
24
As additional information, the northern portion of the project is proposed as an
open space area that is connected to Linkage Area C via a designated hardUne area
25 on the property to the north (Cantarini Ranch). The vegetation communities within
the open space lot include both riparian and upland areas with a few small patches
27 of Diegan coastal sage scrub. In addition, the southern open space lots (Lots 20, 21,
and a portion of 23) includes several patches of coastal sage scrub to be preserved
28 for a total of 8.89 acres of coastal sage scrub in preserved open space. These areas
are located within Core Area 5, which connects to Linkage Area C.
PC RESO NO. 6866 -5-
15
^ 14. Creation of linkage should utilize patches of existing habitat to the maximum extent
2 practicable. Creation of the linkage must utilize patches of existing habitat within the
identified linkage alignment (HMP, Zone 15 Planning Standards, pg. D-79), in that the
3 northern portion of the project is proposed as an open space area (Lots 23 and 24),
which are connected to Linkage Area C via a designated hardline area on the
4 property to the north (Cantarini Ranch). This open space area includes a
^ wetland/riparian corridor and patches of native coastal sage scrub and coast live
oak woodland. The hardline open space area on Cantarini Ranch includes an
6 upstream portion of this drainage that is connected to the drainage in Linkage Area
C. Preservation of this portion of the Rancho Milagro site as open space will
7 increase the protection for this drainage system. In addition, restoration is
g proposed for the northern open space lots that wUI convert the majority of the
agricultural flelds and non-native grassland to coastal sage scrub and riparian
9 habitats. The linkages created by the project utUize patches of existing habitat to
the maximum extent practicable within the identifled linkage aUgnment.
10
15. Maintain and enhance the wildlife movement potential between core areas using sensitive
^ ^ design of any road or utility crossings of Linkage C (HMP, Zone 15 Planning Standards,
12 pg- D-79), in that this standard is not appUcable to the project, since the project site
is not within Linkage Area C and thus has no road or utiUty crossings. For
13 additional information, please see above flndings for discussion of proposed open
space and how it relates to Linkage Area C.
14
16. Conserve all riparian habitats on-site, and prohibit fill or development within the exisfing
floodplain except where required for Circulafion Element roads. Drainage Master Plan
15 facilities, or other essential infrastmcture (HMP, Zone 15 Planning Standards, pg. D-79),
in that all on-site riparian habitat and floodplains are preserved, except where
17 impacts are required in order to provide for essential infrastructure, such as the
extension of "K" Street into the site and the 16 foot wide bridge maintenance access
^ ^ road. To minimize impacts, the proposed extension of "K" Street has been shifted
19 to the narrowest portion of the riparian habitat/floodplain. The project preserves
nearly all of the riparian habitat/fioodplain, and project impacts on the riparian
20 habitat/floodplain are minimal. The project conserves aU riparian habitats and
prohibits flU or development within the existing floodplain on-site except where
21 required for Drainage Master Plan faciUties and other essential access roads and
22 infrastructure.
23 17. Conserve any Narrow Endemic plant populations identified during planning (HMP, Zone
15 Plarming Standards, pg. D-79), in that pursuant to the biological technical report
24 that was prepared for the project, no Narrow Endemic plant populations have been
2^ identifled on the project site.
25 18. When conversion of agricultural lands to other uses is proposed, set back all development
impacts at least 100 feet from existing wetiand habitats and require habitat restoration or
27 enhancement in the riparian and buffer areas (HMP, Zone 15 Planning Standards, pg. D-
79), in that on the south side of the project site, adjacent to Agua Hedionda Creek,
the average setback from the wetland is approximately 300 feet. The exception to
this is the proposed bio-fUtration detention area on the western edge of the property.
PC RESO NO. 6866 -6-
The stormceptor collector system associated with this bio-flltration detention area is
2 designed to handle the 85*** percentile storms and wiU remove the majority of any
storm-related sediment associated with those storms. This bio-filtration detention
3 area will be inspected annuaUy, but maintenance is not expected to be needed as
trash and sediment wiU be caught and removed at the stormceptor coUector. This
4 bio-flltration detention area wiU have an earthen berm and bottom to allow for
^ growth of natural vegetation as identified in the HMP.
6 On the north side of the project site, adjacent to the unnamed tributary, the project
has been designed so that the setback from the wetland is a minimum of 100 feet
7 except for storm outfalls and a smaU (16 foot wide) emergency aU-weather access
road for bridge maintenance. In addition, the project proposes to create, restore,
and enhance wetland/riparian habitat within the open space lots on-site to achieve
9 no net loss of wetland/riparian habitat. This is proposed on the west end of the
project north of the drainage. The creation of 0.07 acres, representing a 1:1
10 mitigation ratio, wiU be accompUshed outside of the 100-foot wetland habitat buffer.
The remaining 0.14 acre (2:1 mitigation ratio) wUI be conducted within the buffer
and wUl serve to connect the restoration outside of the buffer to the existing
drainage.
11
12
13 The setback for all development impacts is at least 100 feet from existing wetland
habitats. In addition, restoration of wetland and riparian impacts will occur on-site
14 within the riparian and buffer areas.
19. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
15 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mifigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
17 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
22
Conditions: 18
19
If any of the following condifions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
20 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
21 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building pennits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a nofice of violation on the
23 property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
24 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Habitat Management Plan
Permit.
25
25 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modificafions to the Habitat Management Plan Permit documents, as necessary to
27 make them intemally consistent and in conformity with the final acfion on the project.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
28 development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
PC RESO NO. 6866 -7-
3. If any condition for constmction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
2 of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are
challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Govemment Code Section
3 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
4 all requirements of law.
4. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
6 harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attomey's fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectiy, from (a) Cify's approval and issuance of this Habitat Management Plan
Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any pennit or action, whether discrefionary or
9 non-discrefionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c)
Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including
10 without limitafion, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of
electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligafion survives unfil
all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not
validated.
7
11
12
13 5. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Addendum, GPA 06-03, ZC
14 06-02, CT 06-04, SUP 06-05, and HDP 06-01 and is subject to all conditions contained
1^ in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6860, 6861, 6862, 6863, 6864, and 6865 for
those other approvals incorporated herein by reference.
16
6. As a condition of this approval, applicant must comply with the requirements of all
17 regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the project and any mitigation requirements
of the environmental documents for the project. Pursuant to Govemment Code section
65871 and Carisbad Municipal Code Titie 20, Chapter 20.04, section 20.04.140 applicant
19 shall grant a conservation easement for the conservation, protection, and management of
fish, wildlife, nafive plants and the habitat necessary for biologically sustainable
20 populafions of certain species thereof, in accordance with the City's adopted Habitat
Management Plan.
21
22 7. Developer shall implement, or cause the implementafion of, the RANCHO MILAGRO -
GPA 06-03, ZC 06-02, CT 06-04, SUP 06-05, HDP 06-01, AND HMP 09-01 Project
23 Mifigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Addendum.
24 8. This approval shall become null and void if grading permits are not issued for this
2^ project within 24 months from the date of project approval.
26 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or clearing of any habitat, whichever occurs first, the
Developer shall take the following actions to the satisfaction of the City Planner in
27 relation to the open space lot(s) which are being conserved for natural habitat in
conformance with the City's Habitat Management Plan;
28
PC RESO NO. 6866
^ a. Select a conservation enfity, subject to approval by the City, that possesses
2 qualificafions to manage the open space lot(s) for conservafion purposes.
3 b. Prepare a Property Analysis Record (PAR) or other method acceptable to the City for
estimating the costs of management and monitoring of the open space lot(s) in
4 perpetuity in accordance with the requirements of the North County Multiple Habitats
^ Conservation Plan and the City's Open Space Management Plan.
5 c. Based on the results of the PAR, provide a non-wasting endowment or other financial
mechanism acceptable to the City Planner and conservation entity, if any, in an
7 amount sufficient for management and monitoring of the open space lot(s) in
perpetuity.
d. Record a Conservafion Easement over the open space lot(s).
10 e. Prepare a Preserve Management Plan which will ensure adequate management of the
^ ^ open space lot(s) in perpetuity.
12 10. This project has been found to result in impacts to wildlife habitat or other lands, such as
agricultural land, non-native grassland, and disturbed lands, which provide some benefits
13 to wildlife, as documented in the City's Habitat Management Plan and the environmental
analysis for this project. Developer is aware that the City has adopted an In-lieu
14 Mitigation Fee consistent with Secfion E.6 of the Habitat Management Plan and City
Council Resolution No. 2000-223 to fiind mifigation for impacts to certain categories of
vegetation and animal species. The Developer is further aware that the City has
15 determined that all projects will be required to pay the fee in order to be found consistent
with the Habitat Management Plan and the Open Space and Conservation Element of the
17 General Plan. Developer or Developer's successor(s) in interest shall pay the fee prior to
recordation of a final map, or issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever
occurs first. The appUcant shaU pay habitat in-Ueu mitigation fees, consistent with
19 the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP) and the biological study (RECON,
AprU 27, 2011), for impacts to 11.83 acres of Agricultural Land (HMP Habitat
20 Group F). If the In-lieu Mifigafion Fee for this project is not paid, this project will not be
consistent with the Habitat Management Plan and the General Plan and any and all
21 approvals for this project shall become null and void.
22
11. Prior to approval of the final map, the Developer shall: 1) consult with the United States
23 Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the impacts of the Project; and 2) obtain
any permits required by the USWFS.
24
25
15
12. If a grading permit is required, all grading activities are prohibited from (Febmary 1st for
gnatcatcher or March 1st for vireo) to (September 15th for gnatcatcher or October 1st for
25 vireo). All erosion control measures must be installed prior to the initial grading. Any
grading extensions into the grading prohibition period must receive written approval of
27 the City Engineer and the responsible wildlife agencies (Califomia Department of Fish
and Game/United States Fish and Wildlife Service).
28
PC RESO NO. 6866 -9-
13. In preparation of the Preserve Management Plan, the Preserve Manager shall
2 evaluate the need for cowbird trapping within the Rancho Milagro preserve and
any necessary coordination with the City's Preserve Steward on any cowbird
3 trapping activities in the immediate vicinity.
10
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE 4
5
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
6 reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
^ "fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposifion of these fees/exacfions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Govemment Code Section
9 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
11 annul their imposition.
12 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
13 zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
15 expired.
PC RESO NO. 6866 -10-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad held on February 15, 2012, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioners Amold, Black,
4 L'Heureux, Nygaard, Scully and Siekmann
MICHAEL SCHUMACHER, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST;
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DON NEU
17 City Planner
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOES;
ABSENT;
ABSTAIN:
PC RESO NO. 6866 -11-