HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-04-18; Planning Commission; Resolution 6876
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A 9,326 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO
AN EXISTING 33,872 SQUARE FOOT SKILLED NURSING
FACILITY ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF
EL CAMINO REAL AND NORTH OF CALLE BARCELONA
WITHIN THE LA COSTA GLEN COMMUNITY IN THE EAST
BATIQUITOS LAGOON/HUNT PROPERTIES SEGMENT OF
THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 23.
CASE NAME: LA COSTA GLEN SKILLED NURSING
FACILITY EXPANSION
CASE NO.: CDP 98-04(B)
WHEREAS, Continuing Life Communities, LLC, “Developer and Owner,” has
filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned described as
Lot 6 of City of Carlsbad Tract No. 92-08, Green Valley, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to map thereof No. 13997, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, July 10, 2000,
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal
Development Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibits “A”-“O” dated April 18, 2012, attached
hereto and on file in the Carlsbad Planning Division, CDP 98-04(B) - LA COSTA GLEN
SKILLED NURSING FACILITY EXPANSION, as provided in Chapter 21.81.040 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on April 18, 2012, hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Coastal Development Permit Amendment; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6876
PC RESO NO. 6876 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2004, the Planning Commission approved CDP 98-
04(A), as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5591.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
APPROVES CDP 98-04(B) - LA COSTA GLEN SKILLED NURSING
FACILITY EXPANSION., based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal
Program and all applicable policies in that the existing 33,872 square foot skilled
nursing facility use is consistent with the land uses identified in the Local Coastal
Program and was approved by a Coastal Development Permit including findings of
consistency with the Local Coastal Program; and, the 9,326 square foot addition is
an expansion of an existing approved land use within an area that does not have
access to the coast or coastal inlets and an area that is fully developed and
surrounded by development without any sensitive resources value.
2. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3
of the Coastal Act in that the 9,326 square foot addition to an existing 33,872 square
foot skilled nursing facility is located within an existing fully developed retirement
community that does not have adjacency to the coast or coastal inlets and does not
affect access to or the provision of coastal recreation opportunities.
3. The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay
Zone (Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the
City's Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, Standard
Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) and Jurisdictional Urban Runoff
Management Program (JURMP) to avoid increased urban runoff, pollutants, and soil
erosion. No steep slopes or native vegetation is located on the subject property and the
site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion,
floods, or liquefaction.
4. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
. . .
. . .