HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-11-12; City Council; 9821; College Business Park (110 acre industrial park)1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
1c
11
12
12
14
If
1(
1:
1E
l!
2(
2:
2:
ORDINANCE NO. 9821
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN SP-199 FOR THE COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK, A 110 ACRE INDUSTRIAL PARK GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AT THE
INTERSECTION OF FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVARD. APPLICANT: COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK
CASE NO: SP-199
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
California, has reviewed and considered a Specific Plan for future
development of the site; and
WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the
requirements of law the City Council has determined that the
public interest indicates that said plan be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The College Business Park Specific Plan, SP-
199, dated September 17, 1986, on file with the Planning Department
and incorporated by reference herein is approved. The Specific
Plan shall provide the development standards and guidelines for
this property and all development of the property shall conform to
the plan.
SECTION 2: That the findings and the conditions of the
Planning Commission in Resolution No. 2577, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by reference shall constitute the findings and
conditions of the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty
days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least
once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its
adoption.
2:
21
21
2i
2'
21
I'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the
day of November 9 1986, Carlsbad City Council on the 4th
and thereafter
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
, 1986, by the Council held on the 12th day of November
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
J-- CLAUDE A. LEWIS, kayor Pro-Tem
ATTEST :
n, ALETHA L. RAU'TEN
2.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2577
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN 199, FOR A 110 ACRE INDUSTRIAL PARK GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AT THE
INTERSECTION OF FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVARD.
APPLICANT: COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK
CASE NO. : SP-199
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to
wit:
Parcels 1 through 4 of Parcel Map No. 6331, in the County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of
the County Recorder of San Diego County, September 8, 1977 as File No. 77-369645 of Official Records,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
'wHEKEAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of
September, 1986 and on the 1st day of October, 1986, hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, to consider said
request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Specific Plan; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) Tnat based on the evidence presented at the public hearing,
the Commission recommends APPROVAL of SP-199, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
//// llli
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
The it is ph ically suitable for the type and densi the developmen' since the site is adequate in size and
to accommodate the proposed project at the intensity proposed.
Y of shape
The project is consistent with all City public facility policy and ordinances because the Specific Plan prohibits any
development on the site without the proper public
improvements.
The proposed use will not be detrimental to adjoining properties for the reasons identified in the staff report.
An EIR was prepared for this property when it was annexed to
the City. September 21, 1982. The EIR identified a number of potentially significant impacts created by the project and possible mitigation measures to reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Specific Plan (SP-199) for the property,
and in some cases, the project has been revised to reduce all
impacts to a level of insignificance. The specific findings for the Planning Commission on each identified impact are
attached as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by reference.
The Specific Plan is consistent with the Carlsbad General
Plan and with Sections 65451 and 65452 of the Government Code
which regulate the use of specific plans.
This EIR 81-9 was certified by the City Council on
The uses proposed within the specific plan will be internally compatible.
Conditions :
1) Approval is granted for the attached ordinance, attached as
Exhibit: "X", dated September 17, 1986, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development
shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in
these conditions.
2) All standards and provisions established in the document
entitled "College Business Park Specific Plan", dated September 17, 1986, and incorporated by reference, shall be met by any future development occurring within the boundaries
of this Specific Plan.
3) Prior to issuance of buildirig permits, a sewer study shall be
completed to ascertain that there is adequate sewer capacity to service this project.
//I/
PC RES0 NO. 2577 -2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
This project is also approved under the express condition hat
the applicant pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on April 22, 1986 and any development fees
established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to
implement a growth management system or facilities and
improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivider's agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated September 18, 1986 and the
agreement to pay the Growth Management Fee dated September 10,
1986, copies of which are on file with the City Clerk and are incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this
application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void.
The following changes to figure 3 (SP-199) shall be made to ensure consistency with the tentative map:
Street "E" to Street "D" Street "A" (west of College) to Street I1Bt1 Street "D" to Street "C"
The text of SP-199 shall be modified by adding the following to the end of Section B, paragraph 4 on page 17: . . . I1 Except for provisions 1 & 2 on page 38."
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 1st day of October, 1986, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Chairman Schelhuber, Commissioners: Marcus, Schramm and Hall.
NOES : Commissioners: McFadden and McBane.
ABSENT: Commissioner Holmes.
ABSTAIN: None.
CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Chairman
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST :
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 2577 -3 -
-. EXHIBIT "D" 0 SEPTEMBER 9, 1986
An annexation Environmental Impact Report (EIR 81-91 was
certified €or this property on September 21, 1982. The
following items constitute the Planning Commission environmental
findings for this project, The mitigation measures listed
below have been incorporated into the proposed project over this
property which reduce the identified impacts to insignficant
levels.
A. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
Impact: The project by itself, will not result in
significant impacts to the traffic circulation
system. However, traffic generated by approved
and planned projects in the area will result in
cumulative significant impacts to the circulation
system.
Mitigation: The proposed project will construct College
Boulevard across the property and widen Palomar
Airport Road and Hidden Valley Road adjacent to
the property boundaries. The project will also
signalize the intersections of Palomar Airport
Road and Hidden Valley Road, contribute 50% of
the cost of signalizing the intersection of
Palomar Airport Road and College Boulevard, and
participate in the City's bridge and thoroughfare
district. Implementation of these measures will
adequately mitigate all proportionate project
traffic impacts.
B. LAND USE
Impact: Adverse impacts to land use include (1) compatibility with the proposed Macario Canyon
Park, (2) potentially significant crash hazard
and noise impacts associated with Palomar Airport
and (3) non-compliance with Mello I1 Local
Coastal Program resource preservation policies.
Mitigation: Compatibility impacts associated with Macario
Canyon Park have been mitigated through
provisions of Specific Plan 199 which require
that all industrial lots adjacent to Macario
Canyon Park be fully landscaped along their
perimeters. Potential noise and crash hazard
impacts from Palomar Airport have been mitigated
by conditioning through the Specific Plan that
structures upon lots 19, 22, 23, and 24 be
restricted to certain uses and lot coverages as
follows:
a) warehouses - maximum 75% lot coverage
b) Offices - maximum 35% lot coverage
No storage or manufacture of explosives or highly
flammable materials will be allowed on these
lots. The Planning Director must approve all
uses proposed on these lots. These provisions
will adequately mitigate the identified land use
impacts. Special construction measures have also
been incorporated to mitigate internal noise to
acceptable levels.
The project as proposed has been redesigned to
come into compliance with slope and resource
preservation policies of the Mello I1 Local coastal Program policies.
C. AIR QUALITY
Impact: Development of the property with industrial uses
will result in an incremental addition to the
regional emission of air pollutants.
Mitigation: Project specific air quality impacts can be
mitigated through the implementation of various
air quality strategies including the use of
carpools, mass transit and other industrial
energy conservation measures as stated in the
RAQS. Effective long term mitigation can only be
accomplished on a regional basis.
D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would
impact several areas of sensitive coastal sage
scrub habitat located across the property. This
impact would be significant in that it would
continue to reduce regionally this sensitive
wildlife habitat which is located within the
coastal zone.
Mitigation: The tentative map has been redesigned to maintain
a 4.1 acre area of coastal sage scrub habitat in
open space. Otherwise the project is in
compliance with all Local Coastal Program
sensitive resource policies.
-2-
as-
E. TOPOGRAPHY AND VISUAL AESTETICS
Impact: Impacts to landform will result from grading of
the site into manufactured pads and slopes.
These visual impacts will be significant to auto
traffic along Palomar Airport Road,
Mitigation: The tentative map has been designed to avoid large
manufactured slopes along Palomar Airport Road.
The slopes that will exist along Palomar Airport
Road have been reduced to a maximum gradient of
3:1 to soften their appearance. The other
manufactured slopes along College Boulevard and
throughout the center of the property have been
undulated from 2:l to 3:l to accomplish this same
affect. In addition these slopes will be fully
landscaped to mitigate visual impacts of
development.
F. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Impact: Project implementation will result in increased
runoff, sediment load and altered chemical
content of runoff.
Mitigation: These impacts will be mitigated through the
incorporation of detention basins and drainage
facilities to control runoff. In addition, a
maintenance program to remove debris from paved
surfaces will be implemented to reduce chemical
contaminants associated with runoff.
G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Impact: Development of the property could be impacted by
potential hazards resulting from unstable soils,
secondary seismic effects and erosion.
Mitigation: A detailed soils study will be submitted with
grading plans. At that time specific mitigations
will be recommended relative to any soils impacts
identified.
-3-