Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCalifornia, State Of; 1961-05-02; Personnel Board- . l ‘ 1 .f COST SERVICE CONTRACT FORM A THIS AGREEMEZT, made and entered into this day of 9 ML- / , by and between the H STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, through its duly appointed, qualified and acting Executive Officer, party of the first part, hereinafter called the Board, and the CTTY OF f&&S&Q ) party of the second part, hereinafter called the Local Agency. WITNESSETH Section 1. That the parties, for and in consideration of the covenants, conilitions, agreements, and stipulations to authority contained in Section 18’707, follows: hereinafter expressed, and pursuant Government Code, hereby agree a6 Sectirrn 2. In performing the services incident to the planning, scheduling, prer)aration, construction and rating of written examinations for ClaSSifiCatiOnS to be mutually agreed upon by the Lacal Agency and the Board, the following provisions shall govern: a, Scheduling of Examinations Whenever, during the term of this agreement, the Local Agency desires the services of the Board in the preparation of a written examination fer a job classification, the Local Agency will submit to the Board a request for such services. Upon the recommendation of the Local Agency, the Board shall set examination dates and closing dates for filing applications that will allew sufficient time for examination scheduling and preparation, b. Information to be Furnished by Local Agency. The Local Agency shall supply the Board with a written description of the work performed in the class for which the Local Agency desires an examination prepared, including a statement of the minimum and/or desirable qualificatirns and the salary of the class. Cost A -l- 1 . . “ C. Ilotification of 1?umber of Competitors Immediately after the --_II----^ -_---- closing date for filinS applications, the Local PCency will notify the Board of the total number of competitors in each classification. a* Preparation of Test Ksterials The Board shall construct an . .e ---.- appropriate written extination for each job classification for which an exsmination has been requested by the Local Agency and agreed upon by the Board. e. Transmittal of Test Fiaterials The Board shall transmit to the ..-I- Local Agency sufficient examination booklets, instructions for administering the examination and such other material as the Board may deem necess-ary. f. Administration of Test and Return of Test Materials The TLocal ---.- _ - Agency shall ac: 'mLnister the examination in accordance with instructions provided by the Board and immediately following the examination will return to the Soard all used and unused examination booklets, keyed booklets, scoring keys, instructions, and any other materials furnished by the Board and not consumed (except as may be provided in paraC:i-aphs 2h, 2i and 21 herein). Re-use of such examination material without prior written permission of the Board is not allowed. (5. .z Scoring of Tests The Board will score the booklets and report -._II_-- the results, toGether Jrith a recommended qualifying score, to the Local Agency within ten working days Gter the booklets are returned to the Eoard, provided that in unusual circumstances involving large numbers of competitors or unforeseen difficulties in administration of the test, the parties may agree mutually to extend the period for receipt of results. h. Test Papers Inspection alder Local Agency Policy If the Local Agency has an officially adopted rule or established policy regarding candidates' privilege of inspecting a keyed copy of an examination booklet Cost A -2.. . l r answer booklet foll&ing the examination, and this rule or policy has been submitted in writing to the Board at least ten days prior to the first examination scheduled under this Agreement for which such inspection is desired, the Board will comply with the inspection privilegesas officially recognized by the Lacal Agency, except that no inspection shall be allowed of standardized or copyrighted tests, or tests preduplicated as Form Tests, or of questions not scored by an absolute standard. MO candidateisto be allowed to take away with him any notes regarding a test question. Upon request of the Local Agency and when submitted in writing by a candidate who participated in the examination, the Board will analyse protests resulting from such review and recommend the action to be taken by the Local Agency. . 1. Test Papers Inspection Under Eioard Policy If the Local Agency has no officially adopted rule or established policy regarding candidates' privilege of inspecting a keyed copy of an examination booklet or answer booklet following the examination and wishes to allow such an inspection privilege, the following policy of the Board shall govern: (1) Key Inspection Inspection of a keyed copy of the exnraina- tion question booklet, which is for the purpose of requesting a review 02 such items as the candidate may believe are incorrectly or improperly keyed, will be allowed for the five working days immediately following an examination, providing this has been requested by the Local Agency at least ten days prior to the examina- tion. The inspection time allowed a candidate will not exceed one- half the amount of time originally allowed to answer the questions during the administration of the exe&nation. During key inspection a representative of the personnel or administrative office of the Local Agency will be present to assure that the candidate takes Cost A -3- ~,.~*rFr_r*s.~.~.~w,‘r..~~” ‘..a..,“T.T rc.* .y, .A :* ‘.L + 14. -- I. .i <, I * .Y, .- y. i. ‘,. . ‘; *-.*j -‘: .,I’* ‘.a+e?‘W a.3 *- . . . no notes of any kind regarding anytest materials. Upon request of the Local.Agency and when submitted in writing by a candidate who participated in the examination, the Board will analyze protests resulting from such review and recommend the action to be taken by the Local Agency. (2) Answer Baeklet Inspection Inspection of a candidate’s answer booklet, which is for the purpose of detecting whether any clerical or other error has been made in the scoring of the booklet, shall be allowed for a thirty-calendar-day period immediately follaring the notification to the candidate of examination results, Upon request, the Board will return the candidate’s answer booklet after scoring and a copy of a keyed answer booklet to the Local Agency. Candidates are not allowed t0 review the question booklet during this inspection period. Not more than one hour will normally be allowed for answer booklet review, during which time a representative of the personnel or administrative office of the Local Agency shall be present tc assure that no changes or marks of any kind are made by the candidate on his answer booklet or the keyed answer booklet. (3) Form Tests Not to be Open for Inspection Standardized or copyrighted tests, Form Tests referred to in Section 5 hereof, and questions not scored by an absolute standard will not be available for keyed copy inspection nor may candidates be allowed to review copies of these tests at any time. A. Retention of Test Nterial by the Board The Board shall, if requested by the Local Agency, retain the completed question booklets or answer sheets or booklets for such reasonable period of time as the Local Agency rules may prescribe. cost A -4- *- “..<,,V . . . ..t..* ., ,. , 8 -4 _. .,.. \ k. Local Agency Responsibilities The Local Agency shall perform a11 parts of the examination process the performance of which has not specifically been requested ~2 and agreed to by the Board and shall assume responsibility for the conformity of the examination process to any applicable laws, rules, or ordinances and for the examination as a whole. 1. Continuous Testi% If the Local Agency wishes to administer examinations on a continuous basis for certain mutually agreed upon classes, the Board may, in its discretion, supply the examination booklets, a scoring key and instructions far continuous administration. Administration of examinations on a continuous basis is defined as the retention and use ef the examination booklets and instructions one or more times in any month during the term of this agreement,, The Local Agency will score such examinations and will report to the Board at the.end of each quarter (1) the number of candidates testing during the quarter for each form of examination and (2) the score of each candidate on the examinatiop. m. Security of Test Material All test materials supplied by the Board under this agreement shall be and remain the property ef the Board, and shall be kept confidential. The Local Agency agrees to be responsible for the security of all test materials supplied to the Agency and agrees to reimburse the Board for a portion or all of the replacement costs, as determined by the Board, for test materials that are lost or whose value for testing purposes, in the opinion of the Board, may have been destroyed while said test materials were subject to the custody of the L;acS$Agency. I. _ Cost A -‘$... I “,.. ,- . -3~ . Section 3. Special Services Upon the request of the Local k.gency, the -- Board,in its discretion, shall supply any or all of the following special services : a. Advice and assistance on examining procedures and problems. b. Preparation and distribution of examination publicity. C. Distribution, receipt, and appraisal of applications. d. Preparation, administration and scoring of demonstration tests. e. Advice on and conduct of oral interviews, f. Preparation of eligible lists. 8. Other technical personnel services, Section 4. Non-Farm Examination Services and Charges In consideration Of the performance by the Board of the services agreed to be performed by the Board as set forth in Sections 2 and 3 hereof (except for Form Tests provided under Section 2(l)), the Local Agency hereby agrees to reimburse the Board 'for the latter's cost, as determined by the Board, incurred in performing said services, including salaries, retirement, vacation, sick leave, related operating expenses, and travel expenses (in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Board of Control of the State ef California) for employees assigned to perform these services, except as provided in Section 5 hereof. Section 5. Form Test Service and Charges In performing services incident to the preparation, construction and rating of examinations which have been preduplicated as Form Tests, the following provisions shall govern: a. The Local Agency shall supply the Board with a written description of the work performed in the class,including a statement of the minimum and/or desirable qualifications. The Board shall determine whether or not a Form Test is appropriate. Cost A -6- - . c b. If a Form Test is considered appropriate by the Board for the purpose, the Board shall, upon the recommendation of the Local Agency, set the examination date and the closing date for filing applications. Immediately al"ter the closing date, the Local Agency will notify the Board of the total number of competitors for each examination. c. The procedures set forth in Subsections e, f, g, j, and k of Section 2 of this contract shall apply to examinations provided for in this Section 5; except that upon mutual agreement the Local Agency may perform the service described under Subsection g of Section 2. d. In consideration of the performance by the Board of the Form Test services as set forth in this Section 5, the Local Agency agrees to reimburse the Board in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth in the following Schedule A or Schedule B whichever is applicable: Number of Candidates Taking Examination 1 to 10 11to 20 21to 35 36 to 50 51to 80 81to 110 Schedule A Schedule B (Board scored and (Scored by Local tabulated)* Agency) $20.00 minimum charge 2.00 per candidate 1.75 per candidate 1.50 per candidate 1.25 per candidate 1.10 per candidate $13.00 minimum cl>arge 1.30 per candidate 1.10 per candidate 1.00 per candidate .90 per candidate .80 per candidate 111 or more Lower rate quoted on request Lower rate quoted on request *Additional kharge of 654 per candidate for scoring of typing performance tests and $1.00 per candidate for scoring of stenography performance tests. Cost A -7- . 1 “1 1 e. In consideration of the performance by the Board of the Continuous Testing Services employing Form Tests, as set forth in Section 2(l), the Local Agency agrees to reimburse the Board in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth in the following Schedule C: Schedule C (Continuous Testing Form Tests) Cumulative Number oP Candidates During Year Charge_ 0 to 30th candidate $33.00 minimum charge 31st to 35th candidate 1.10 per candidate 36th to 50th candidate 1.00 per candidate 51st to 80th candidate .gO per candidate 61st to 110th candidate .80 per candidate 111th or g-eater number of candidates Lower rate quoted on request Section 6. The Board shall, from time to time, submit invoices covering services rendered and the Local Agency agrees to pay such invoices within 60 days following receipt thereof. The term of this agreement shall be from the date hereof to and including June 30, 1.962, but shall be subject to termination by either party upon giving the other party 30 day's written notice of termination. BY Cost A -89 EXCERPT FROM MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL HELD ON MAY 2, 1961. The following is an extract portion of the minutes of the Carlsbad City Council held on May 2, 1961: Contract with State Examination Board. The City Manager presented a contract between the State Examination Board and the City of Carlsbad, and requested authorization for execution of the contract. By motion of the Council Mayor La Roche was authorized to sign the contract on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. STATE OF CALIFORNIA: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO: SS. CITY OF CARLSBAD : I, J. H. PRICE, City Clerk of the City of Carlsbad, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct extract portion of the minutes of the City Council of a regular meeting held on May 2, 1961. DATED: June 27, 1961. GT$+JY~k . . . t Y er of the City of Carlsbad (SEAL) June 27, 1961 Mr. Robert W. Fischer Southern California Manager Cooperative Personnel Serticesr Room 1038 107 South Broadway LOG Angeles, California Dear Mr. Fischer: I am attsching two certified copies of excerpts from the Carl&bad City Council minutes authorizing the Mayor to sign the contracts. Sincerely, JOHN D. SLATER City Manager JDS:ma Ek2loaruree EDMUND G. BROWN GCW0rll0r Kenneth Byerr Chief of Division 801 Capitol Avenue Sacramento HI ckory 5-4711 - Ext. 3494 CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES Los Angeles June 22, 1961 ' Mr. John D. Slater, City Manager City of Carlsbad 2960 Pio Pica Drive Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Slater: Our Sacramento office has received the signed contracts between the City of Carlsbad and the Cooperative Personnel Services. However, before we can process these contracts, we need to have certified copies of the resolution or minutes of the meeting of the City Council authorizing the contract. We would appreciate it very much if you would send us two certified copies of the authorization by the City Council at your earliest convenience, so that we may complete the processing at our end and return a copy of the contract to you for your files. Very truly yours, Robert W. Fischer Los Angeles Manager Rm. 1028, State Office Bldg. 107 South Broodwoy MAdiron O-3725 Southern*California Manager RwF:lg - . . COST SERVICE CONTRACT GTA THIS AG-, made and entered into this 1962, by and between the STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, ly appointed, qualified and acting Executive Officer, party of the first part, hereinafter called the Board, and the party of the second part, hereinafter called the Lot WJ!NESSETH Section 1. That the parties, for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations hereinafter expressed, and pursuant to authority contained in Section 18707, Government Code, hereby agree as follows: Section 2. In performing the services incident to the planning, scheduling, preparation, construction and rating of written examinations for classifications to be mutually agreed upon by the Local Agency and the Board, the following provisions shall govern: a. Scheduling of Examinations Whenever, during the term of this agreement, the Local Agency desires the services of the Board in the preparation of a written examination for a Job classification, the Local Agency will submit to the Board a request for such services. Upon the recommendation of the Local Agency, the Board shall set eXami- nation dates and closing dates for filing applications that will allow sufficient time for examination scheduling and preparation. b. Information to be Furnished by Local Agency The Local Agency shall supply the Board with a written description of the work performed in the class for which the Local Agency desires an examination.prepare8, including a statement of the minimum and/or desirable qualifications and the salary of the class. Cost A ‘c. Notification of Number of Competitors closing date for filing applications, the Local Agency will notify the Board of the total number of competitors in each classification. Immediately after the d. Preparation of Test Materials The Board shall construct an appropriate written examination for each job classification for which an examination has been requested by the Local Agency and agreed upon by the Board. e. Transmittal of Test Materials The Board shall transmit to the Local Agency sufficient examination booklets, Instructions for administering the examination and such other material as the Board may deem necessary. f. Administration of Test and Return of Test Materials The Local Agency shall administer the examination in accordance with in- structions provided by the Board and immediately following the exami- nation will return to the Board all used and unused examination booklets, keyed booklets, scoring keys, Instructions, and any other materials furnished by the Board and not consumed (except as may be provided in paragraphs 2h, 21 and 21 herein). Re-use of such examination material without prior written permission of the Board Is not allowed. - $0 Scoring of Tests The Board will score the booklets and report the results, together with a recommended qualifying score, to the Local Agency within ten working days after the booklets are returned to the Board, provided that in unusual clrcumstances Involving large numbers of competitors or unforeseen difficulties in administration of the test, the parties may agree mutually to extend the period for receipt of results. h. Test Papers Inspection Under Local Agency Policy If the Local Agency has an officially adopted rule or established policy regarding candidates’ privilege of inspecting a keyed copy of an Cost A -2- ’ . cost A examination booklet or answer booklet following the examination, and this rule or policy has been submitted in writing to the Board at least ten days prior to the first examination scheduled under this 1 Agreement for which such inspection is desired, the Board will comply with the inspection privileges as officially recognized by the Local Agency, except that no inspection shall be allowed of standardized or copyrighted tests, or tests preduplicated as Form Tests, or of questions not scored by an absolute standard. No candidate is to be allowed to take away with him any notes regarding a test question. Upon request of the Local Agency and when submitted in writing by a candidate who participated in the examination, the Board will analyze protests resulting from such review and recommend the action to be taken by the Local Agency. i. Test Papers Inspection Under Board Policy If the Local Agency has no officially adopted rule or established policy regarding candidates’ privilege of inspecting a keyed copy of an examination booklet or answer booklet following the examination and wishes to allow such an inspection privilege, the following policy of the Board shall govern: (1) Key Inspection Inspection of a keyed copy of the examination question booklet, which is for the purpose of requesting a review of such items as the candidate may believe are incorrectly or improperly keyed, will be allowed for the five working days immediately following an examination, providing this has been requested by the Local Agency at least ten days prior to the examination. The inspection time allowed a candidate will not exceed one-half the amount of time originally allowed to answer the questions during the administration -3. ‘of the examination. During key inspection a representative of the personnel or administrative office of the Local Agency will be present to assure that the candidate takes no notes of any kind regarding any test materials. Upon request of the Local Agency and when submitted in writing by a candidate who participated in the examination, the Board will analyze protests resulting from such review and recommend the action to be taken by the Local Agency. (2) Answer Booklet Inspection Inspection of a candidate’s answer booklet, which is for the purpose of detecting whether any clerical or other error has been made in the scoring of the booklet, shall be allowed for a thirty-calendar-day period immediately following the notification to the candidate of examination results. Upon request, the Board will return the candidate’s answer booklet after scoring and a copy of a keyed answer booklet to the Local Agency. Candidates are not allowed to review the question booklet during this inspection period. Not more than one hour will normally be allowed for answer booklet review, during which time a representative of the personnel or administrative office of the Local Agency shall be present to assure that no changes or marks of any kind are made by the candidate on his answer booklet or the keyed answer booklet. (3) Form Tests Not to be Open for Inspection Standardized or copyrighted tests, Form Tests referred to in Section 5 hereof, and questions not scored by an absolute standard will not be available for keyed copy inspection nor may candidates be allowed to review copies of these tests at any time. -4- Cost A j, Retention of Test Material by the Board The Board shall, if requested by the Local Agency, retain the completed question booklets or answer sheets or booklets for such reasonable period of time as the Local Agency rules may Fescribe. k. Local Agency Responsibilities The Local Agency shall perform all parts of the examination process the performance of which has not specifically been requested of and agreed to by the Board and shall assume responsibility for the conformity of the examination process to any applicable laws, rules, or ordinances and for the examination as a whole. 1. Continuous Testing If the Local Agency wishes to administer examinations on a continuous basis for certain mutually agreed upon classes, the Board may, in its discretion, supply the examination booklets, a scoring key and instructions for continuous administration. Administration of examinations on a continuous basis is defined as the retention and use of the examination booklets and instructions one or more times in aw month during the term of this agreement. The Local Agency will score such examinations. m. Security of Test Material All test materials supplied by the Board under this agreement shall be and remain the property of the Board, and shall be kept confidential. The Local Agency agrees to be responsible for the security of all test materials supplied to the Agency and agrees to reimburse the Board for a portion or all of the replacement costs, as determined by the Board, for test materials that are lost or whose value for testing purposes, in the opinion of the Board, may have been destroyed while said test materials were subject to the custody of the Local Agency. Cost A Sebtion 3. Special Services Upon the request of the Local Agency, the Board, in its discretion, shall supply any or all of the following special services : a. Advice and assistance on examining procedures and problems. b. Preparation and distribution of examination publicity. c. Distribution, receipt, and appraisal of applications. d. Preparation, administration and scoring of demonstration tests. e. Advice on and conduct of oral Interviews. f. Preparation of eligible lists. Q= Other technical personnel services. Section 4. Non-Form Examination Services and Charges In consideration of the performance by the Board of the services agreed to be performed by the Board as set forth in Sections 2 and 3 hereof (except for Form Tests provided under Section 2(l)), the Local Agency hereby agrees to reimburse the Board for the latter’s cost, as determined by the Board, incurred in performing said services, including salaries, retirement, vacation, sick leave, related operating expenses, and travel expenses (in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Board of Control of the State of California) for employees assigned to perform these services, except as provided in Section 5 hereof. Section 5. Form Test Service and Charges In performing service8 incident to the preparation, construction and rating of examinations which have been preduplicated as Form Tests, the following provisions shall govern: a, The Local Agency shall supply the Board with a written description of the work performed in the class, including a statement of the minimum and/or desirable qualifications. The Board shall determine whether or not a Form Test is appropriate. Cost A b. If a Form Test is considered appropriate by the Board for the purpose, the Board shall, upon the recommendation of the l;ocal Agency, set the examination date and the closing date for filing applications. Immediately after the closing date, the Local Agency till notify the Board of the total number of competitors for each examination. cI The procedures set forth in Subsections e, 9, g, j, and k of Section 2 of this contract shall apply to examinations provided for in this Section 5; except that upon mutual agreement the Iocal Agency may perform the service described under Subsection g of Section 2. d. In consideration of the performance iqy the Board of the Form Test sentices as set forth in this Section 5, the Local Agency agrees to reimburse the Board in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth in the following Schedule A or Schedule B Mchever is applicable: Schedule A Schedule B (Board scored and (Scored by Local Number of Booklets Ordered tabulated)* Aizencd 1 to 10 $25.00 minimum charge $15.OC minimum charge ll to loo Minimum charge plus Minimum charge plus 656 904 per booklet over 10 per booklet over 10 101 or more $106.00 plus 654. per booklet over 100 $73.50 plus 40$ per booklet over 100 (Lower rates available for quantities over 200) * Additional charge of 654 per candidate for scoring of typing performance tests and $1.00 per candidate for scoring of stenographer performance tests. e. In consideration of the performance by the Board of the Continuous Testing Services employing Form Tests as set forth in Section 2(l), b he Local Agency agrees to reimburse the Board the sum of $50.00 for each Form Test supplied the Local Agency for use on a continuous testing basis. Cost A Section 6. The Board shall, from time to time, submit invoices covering services rendered and the Local Agency agrees to pay such invoices within 60 days following receipt thereof. The term of this agreement shall be from the date hereof to and including June 30, 1963, but shall be subject to temination by either party upon giving the other party 30 days' written notice of termination. CITY OF CARLSBAD Iacal Agency By A'<>.,;; 4. .i-,/J/~~- ,.I I/ RALPH SCHOLINK - Cost A f I : ; CITY OF CARLSBAD : Minutes of: CITY ! Date of Meeting: June ! Time of Meeting: 7 :oo COUNCIL (Regular meeting) 19, 1962 P&M. : : : : , : : : , : : I : t : I : : : : : : I : : : : 1 : : : : : : : : : : i : : : : : : i : : : : : : : : : : 4 : : : , 8 : : : : I I : : : : : : : : : : : I I I , : I : I : : : I : ‘ : t : I t : 9 : ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Bierce, Hughes and i Neiswender. Cmn. Neiswender was Mayor Pro Tempore. : Councilmen McPherson and Guevara absent. Also present were City Manager Pro Tempore and City Attorney Hayes. i ; * 1 ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. INVOCATION was offered by Mayor Pro Tempore Neiswender. : : 8 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of June 6, 1962, j Bierce were approved as presented. : Neiswender i Hughes : (b) Minutes of the regular adjourned meeting of : Bierce June 7, 1962, were approved as presented. I : Ne i swender ; Hughes * CORRESPONDEMCE : (a) R. W. Grosse, Chairman, North C0untp;Y.M.C.A. : Aquatic Park Development Committee - re: Leasing of cer- 1 tain areas of the middle lagoon waters. Letter dated June 11, 1962, from Russell W. Grosse, Chairman, North : County Y.M.C.A. Aquatic Park Development Conanittee, re- ; : questing the City to give consideration to the possibi- i lity of leasing certain areas of the water in the middle : lagoon to the North County Y.M.C.A. : , i The City Attorney informed the Council she had been con- : tacted regarding this matter. In view of the fact the City now has a lease from the San Diego Gas & Electric i : co., which includes the middle lagoon, it was her feeling: that if the Council wished to lease the area, the City should enter into a sub-lease with the North County, i Y.M.C.A. of the area designated on the plat attached to : : the letter. : : By motion of the Council the City Attorney was instructed! Bierce to prepare a sub-lease between the City and the North i Ne i swender County Y.M.C.A. for the area designated on the plat sub- : Hughes mi tted. : * (b) California Society for the Sons of the American; Revolution - re: Proclamation urging the:flying of the , American Flag and ringing of church bells on the 4th of i July. Letter dated June 6, 1962, requesting the Mayor tot issue a proclamation urging the flying of our flag on the! Fourth of July’, and the ringing of church bells for five i minutes, from twelve to twelve five on that day. : : With the consent of the Council, the Mayor Issued a pro- : clam&ion urging the flying of our flag on the Fourth of : July, and the ringing of church bells for five minutes, i from twelve to twelve five on that day. : : I (c) City of De1 Mar - re: Request for Council to proclaim the period June 29, 1962, to July 8, 1962, San i Diero County Fair Week. Letter dated June 8, 1962, from : the City of De1 Mar, California, requesting the City of ; : Carlsbad to proclaim June 29, 1962, to July 8, 1962, as ; “San Diego County Fair Week”. : I With the consent of the Council, the Mayor proclaimed thei period of June 29, County Fair Week”. 1962, to July 6, 1962, as ‘*San Diego i : 8 I : : : 1 : ..------------------------------------.------------------------------------!- : : : ‘ : : I 1 : : : : : : : : I : I : : : : : : , : : 8 : : : I : i : : : 4 , : : : : : : : I : : : : I : : I : : : I : : I : 4 : : : I : : : ‘ : : * I : : : : 8 : 8 : : t : 8 I : I : : : : : : : 8 : , I (d) Robert L. Watson - re: Hazardous condition in i drainage ditch at Birch and Sunnyhill Streets. Letter dated June O,%b2, from R. L.-atson, stating he repre- ! sented property owners in the immediate area of the inter4 section of Sunnyhill and Birch Streets, and wished to : point out a condition and extreme hazard that exists, i namely, the erosion that is taking place from the in- : creased rainfall in the last year, There now exists a : ditch approximately 20 feet in depth. The Assistant Engij neer stated he had inspected this area and this ditch is : on private property. This is a natural drainage channel and is a dangerous area, i however, the City does not have , an easement. The ditch is approximately 15 feet deep. ! There are other similar areas like this in the City that : are also on private property. : : The Mayor requested the City Attorney to check into this : matter and ascertain whether or not the City could force : : the property owners to correct this dangerous situation. ; : (e) Southern Counties Gas Co. - re: Vacation of Ocean Avenue. Letter dated June 13, 1962, from Southern ! Counties Gas Company, : regarding the proposed vacation of ; the dead-end portion of Ocean Avenue. They stated a 12” : high pressure gas main is maintained by the Southern i Counties Gas Company which supplies gas to San Diego, the: coastal cities and the steam plant of the Encfno Plant, ; which is located on the Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way. : The dead-end portion of Gcean Avenue, which ends at the i railroad right-of-vay, is the only access they have to : maintain or repair the line. This abandonment would de- i prive them of the sole access to the site where the pipe- : line is located, making maintenance difficult or impossi- i ble. If this vacation is effected, they would have to seek easements. ! : The City Attorney stated this matter is being set for i ; hearing, and this letter should be made part of the hear- : ing at the tima the hearing is held. : : The Mayor requested the City Attorney to investigate thfs i matter further, : ‘ (f) State Water Rights Board - re: Notice of anpli-‘: cation to appropriate water. Notice of application to : appropriate water has been received from the State Water i Rights Board. It is proposed that the water to be appro- : priated would come from Indian Flats Springs Tributary to i unnamed stream thence San Luis Rey River. Anyone desirinq to protest such permit shall file a written protest with ; the State Water Rights Board within 40 days df.June 13,196:. The City Attorney stated the City should ascertain whether: the water would be taken from the water shed of the San Luis Rey River, and if so, the City should protest. j : : The City Attorney was instructed to pursue this matter, i and if it is found that the water would be diverted from ; the water shed of the San Luis Rey, that a protest be : , entered on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. (g) County Boundary Corranission - re: Annexation to : --.--c ---, the City of: Oceanside. Letter dated June 12, 1962, from \ the County Boundary Commission, notifying the City of : Carlsbad the intention of the City of Oceanside to annex : certain properties. A plat of the area was enclosed. : I I i By common consent, the notice was ordered filed. , : : I 4 i : : : : I : : : t : 8 : : : : : : : , I : 3 : : : : : I : : : t I 8 t , : I : t : : : : : : , ; : : : : : : : : : : : 8 : : : : f : : : : I : : : : 1 : : : : : : : : , : : : : I : : : I : I : : : I ORAL COMMUNICATIONS : There were no oral connnunications. LIBRARY : : 1 , i (a) Appointments to Library Board of Trustees. I Letter dated June 13, 1952 from the Cnrlsbnd Board of : Library Trustees, stating the terms of office of Trustee; Mrs. David Dunne and Mrs. Robert Strause expire on July i 1, 1962, and the Board wishes to recommend for the Coun- : cil’s consideration the appointment of Mrs. EdwardMcCanni and Mrs. Gustav Kamptner to fill these vacancies. They 1 are very capable persons and are well informed on the prc+ gress of the City Library. : : : With the consent of the Council the Mayor appointed Pirs. I Edward McCann and Mrs. Gustav Kamptner to the Board of ! Library Trustees for a three year term,, expiring July 1,: 1965. : I PUBLIC HEARING : (a) Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commi- i ssion denying a request for variance for reduction in : frontage from 60 feet to 50 feet - Harry F. Alley. : Letter dated May 23, 1962, from Harry F. Kelley and La i Verne R. Kelley, was presented, stating they wished to i appeal the decision of the Planning Conunission made on : May 22, 1962, in denying their application for reduction; in lot frontage from sigty feet to fifty feet. : Notice of Public Hearing was read. Certification was : : given as to proper notice having been given to the ad- : joining property owners. : : I The application for the variance was also reviewed for ; the Council. : I , I Resolution No. 247 of the Planning Commission was read ; wherein they denied the variance. : The Mayor declared the public hearing open and stated thi Council would hear from the appellant or his representa-; tive. : : MR. HARRY F. KELLEY, stated he did not think the Plann- : ing Commission took into consideration the conditions i that exist at this time. He built a garage some eight of ten years ago and extended it 10’ east of the existing i garage. Since that time the Planning Ordinance went inte effect. He is request in, = that the City grant a variance: for reduction of frontage from SO’ to 50’ or allow a i frontage of 60’ extending back 35’ and then 50’ to the i rear lot line (panhandle lot). I : The Mayor announced the Council would hear from any per-i sons desiring to speak in opposition to the granting of this appeal. i There were no persons desiring to speak. : : The Mayor declared the hearing closed at 7:45 P.M. Discussion was given as to whether or not the Planning i Connnission had considered a panhandle lot. The City Attorney referred to the minutes of the Planning Commi- [ ssion dated May 22, 1962, in which Mr. Keiley had sub- mitted a letter dated May 9, 1962, offering an alternate: plan of 60’ frontage on Chestnut Avenue and then at a point 35’ in depth on the west lot line cutting, back 10’: giving the balance of the lot a SO’ width. However, it i 4 : I : . : : . ‘\ ‘\ ‘%\ ‘\ ‘. ‘\ : ‘\ ‘, \\ ‘, ‘, ‘* : : : ‘. ’ \ ’ ‘\ \ \ : \ : \ \’ l \ * ., ‘,, : : . -41. : q‘,‘Y : ; Nam&. ‘-$ ‘\ ‘&i! I : : of ‘y$&?j! ‘\\ y+, ; : i Member ‘*@&&@-gj?~.; : *--*--------*.----------*-*~*****--*~--********-***---**-**~**-----*-*-****!*******---**~-*-~*~*~--~-*~-~! : : : 1 : : : : : : I I I I : : I I 8 : : : I I : : : : : : I ; : t : : : : : I : : : : I 4 : : : , I : : t : : : : : : : : : : : : : : I 8 : : : 4 : : : * : : : : : : I 1 : : : : : : : I : : I : : I I was the feeling of the majority of the Commissioners that i it should be a straight 60’ lot, : , i : x1 ; I i I : ; ; 6 : I , : 8 : ! 1 I : : The City Attorney as!ced Mr, Kelley how many lot splits he / had received on this property previously, and Mr. Kelley : informed the Council he had four previously. : I Cmn. Bierce stated he did not agree with the decision of : : the Planning Commission. This property containe 35,000 ! square feet. There are many 50 ’ lots in the City. A pan- i handle type of lot is allowed in other cities. He would agree to either a 50 : ’ lot straight back or a panhandle lot; with a 60’ frontage. : I The Mayor asked the engineer what the frontage requirement: was on Chestnut Avenue, and he was informed by the Assist-i ant Engineer a 60 ’ lot was required, with 7500 square feet{ 8;; ‘i : : : : ; : : : : ; : , ;- 1 8 : ’ : : : : : I : : : : : : : , I 4 ,I : ; f : : I : 8 : : : : t : * , : : : : : ’ I : : : I : : : : : I , I : 8 : : I : i : 4 ; : : ; : : ; t : ::;a ) ’ I . ! ! b i : After further discussion by the Council, by motion of the 8 Council it was agreed that the appeal for a variance to i allow a lot split with a 50’ frontage be denied, and that : the matter be referred back to the Planning Commission for! reconsideration, with the recommendation that considera- I tion be given to allowing a lot split with a 60’ frontage : Bierce to a depth of 35’, then jogging 10’ to the east and thence! Neiswender south to the rear lot line. : Hughes ! PLANNING : (a) division from; i Memorandum from Planning Con-mission - re: Sub- grading plans. Memorandum dated June 13, 1962, i ; Inning Commission was read, wherein they stated: it had been brought to their attention that inequities to : property adjacent to subdivisions have occurred as the re-i sult of cutting and filling within the subdivision site. : In view of the fact that it is not required, nor economi- ! tally prect ical, no grading plan accompanies tentative : subdivision maps. They requested the Council to give con-! sideration to the effect of the grading plan on properties: adjacent to subdivision sites when the final subdivision : map is presented to the City Council for approval. : : : The City Attorney informed the Council if they wished to ; make this a requirement of the subdivider, an amendment : would have to be made to the subdivision ordinance. : : The Assistant Engineer stated at the present time we do rei quire the subdivider to submit a grading plan; however, oni a lot sale subdivision we do not. When the owner of a lot: requests a building permit we require a grading plan: on : that lot. : I I Ci; ; : : : : : ; t : ; : : : : ; : : : : ’ I : : : : : ., : 4 : : : ; : : 8 : : 9 I I : : : : : ’ ; : : : : ; : : : ; : I : : : : : I : ; * : : ; : : : * I x: : ’ : : : x: : : x, I : : ’ 8 : xi x: : 8 : : I : : . : : , : ; i ; : : I : : ; i ; : : : : ; : ( t : I : I ; 4 : : : ‘ : 4 t , : : 1 ; : ' : : : : ; : : : : : ; : : : I : : : : : , : : ; : : : : ; : : : ‘ , : : 6 : : : I I : 1 ; : t : : ; : : : : ; I : : ; : : : : : i : : : ; : : : ; : ; : : I I : : I : : I : : : : : : : : : : : : : : , : , : : : : : ; ' I I : ' : : ; : ; I i ' * : I t : 8 : ; I : , ' : ; : : : ; : ; 6 I : : : : : : : : : : I I It was agreed that this matter be referred to the Engineer/ ing Department and the City Attorney for study, and the i City Attorney instructed to draft an ordinance requiring ; subdividers to submit grading plans when required, to be submitted at the next regular meeting of the Council, : , I I ENGINEERING : i . (a) Engineering Management, Inc. - re: Southern i Pacific Pine Lines, Inc., Application for Franchise. Let-.! ter dated June 14, 1962, from Engineering Management, inc.i stating they were serving as agents for Southern Pacific : Pipe Lines, Inc. They propose to construct, operate and : maintain a common carrier petroleum products pipeline from: Norwalk, California to San Diegc, California. On April : 10, 19S2, they request’edanencroxhment permit from the i City in a letter directed to the City Engineer. Since that time their representativsmet with the City Engineer [ and the City Attorney, and they were informed the City : : will require a franchise. They requested the Council’s : early consideration on this matter. I I i ; : i : i 1:: :I : : ; : , : : ; : : : : : : ! i : : : : : ; : : ; : : I : ; : : : : ' , : : : 1 I : : t , : i : : ; : : : : : : : , : ' : : : : : : ; t : I : 9 : : , : ; : ] I : ( : ; ' : ; : : : ' ; : ; : ! ‘ I ! 1 ! I : 4 1 : 8 : :to advertise for bids on the franchise. the City Attorney was instructed to ad- Pio Pica, Adams, Tamarack and Chinouapin. ,three Councilmen present, a nd the Resolution of Intention Irequires a four-fifths vote. I , :NEW BUSINZSS: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD :LAGOON BET:lEEN TPE A.T. & S. F. RAILWAY TRESTLE AND THE &TATE OF CALIFORMIA 101 FREEWAY, was given a first reading and he would like to jrequiring boats pullin :an arm to give notice of a skier down, and that the ordin- : ,ance be submitted as an urgency ordinance. I : :OLD BUSINESS: I 8 $he following ordinances were given a second reading by ititle only: : : $rdinance No. 3054. AN ORDDLQ?CE C:F TIIE CITY @I? CAZSBAD ;RELATING T(? MASSAGE PARLOAS, was adopted. iordinance No. 3055. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD t ~PROHIBITING THE ADVERTISING OR ENGAGING IN TH% PRACTICE OF i Bierce c , : : -61 i * : : ---_------------_---____________________-------.-------------------------- IOrdinance No. 3056. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD iAMENDING O~RDINANCE NO. 3005 OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD BY :ADDING SECTION 62 (c) RELPATING TO PARKING ON OCEAN STREET iFROM PACIFIC .4VENUE TO MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, was adopted. I iordinance No. 3057. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, :AI~~ENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3032, SECTICN 83.1 BY ADDING SUB- SECTION (v), R~~IRING TRAFFIC TO STOP ON BEECH AVENUE AT :ROCSEVELT STREET, was adopted. lordinance No 8036 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ~ESTABLISHING*REGULI;TIONS WITH RESPECT TO ENCLOSURE OF :SWIt+lING POOLS, was adopted. : I iordinance No. 9128. AN OP&INANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD #MENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED :PRCPERTY FROM ZONE R-l TO ZCNE o'Mfa, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD [was adopted. Bierce Neiswender Hughes Bierce Neiswender Hughes Bierce Neiswender Hughes Bierce Neiswender Hughes i t iordinance No. 9130. AN ORDINAE!CE OF THE CITY GF CARLSBAD I iAMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED : : Bier& !PROPERTY IN THE CITY CF CARLSBAD FROM ZONES R-A AND R-3 TO ; Neiswender !ZGNE R-T, was adopted; : Hughes I : iCITY ATTORNEY'S REPCRT: : : I : iMeeting with Library Board of Trustees - re: Library Site.! :The City Attorney informed the Council a meeting was held : ,with the Library Board of Trustees, the City I%nager, City : ; iAttorney, Cmn. Bierce and Cmn, Guevara to discuss the librai :ry site. As ahe had to leave early in the meeting, she : iasked if Mr. Bierce would give the report. I I : : 8 Qm. Bierce stated there was considerable discussion given las to the Elm Street property and the Pio Pica property, ! I :and many factors were brought out. One of the Board mem- : ; ibers was very concerned about sufficient parking spaces if : :the library were to be located on the Elm street site. I I iTheir mai.n concern about the Pio Pica location is the fact i ithat sometime in the future Pio Pica will be widened. It i jwas the concensus that the architect for the Library build-i :ing survey the Pio Pica property as to moving the existing : istructure on the property to allow a proper setback for the i ilibrary building. The committee indicated to the Board : ithey would give them every consideration as to the property i : ,on Pi0 Pica. : I : : ‘ ;Cmn. Bierce stated he would like this Council to go on I : irecord as favoring the Elm street property for competitive ; ibidding. : : 8 :B : , y motion of the Council it was agreed that the Elm Street : Bierce iproperty be opened for competitive bidding. : j Neiswender I : Hughes I 1 : ,Appointment to.State Committee. The Council was informed i ,.. ,- ; fthat Mrs. Hayes has been selected as a member of the State : !and Cities Municipal ConWttee. : : ICITY MANAGER'S REPORT: I : ;The City of De1 Mar has requested that the City of Carlsbad! ,exchange their host meeting of the League of California : : iCities from August to Cieptember, as they would like to host, itheir meeting at the De1 Mar Race Track during the racing Iseason. By common consent it was agreed that the City of i : lDe1 Mar,be notified-the City of Carlsbad would be happy to ; iexchange I the date. : I I I : : I : I * : : : : 4 , : : . : : -7- I : : i ,--*-----------------^----------------- --------*- * ---..- * :Letrer dated May 22, ID 1962 from the I isrrict regarding the proposed annexation of Squares Dam iproperty to the City of Csrlsbad :trict is concerned with the zoning iuses that will be permitted. 1 : ;The District requested that the :the information forwarded to their office. : 1 IThe Council was informed that when the property is annexed i $0 the City of Carlsbad it would automatically become R-l i Zone, : iuses. and would have to be rezoned for any other permitted : I : I I iThe City Manager reconanended this matter referred to the istaff for study. i : k I ooperative Personnel Services contract renewal. Letter fro; $he Cooperative Personnel Services of the California State : iPersonnel Board has been received, in which they enclosed : : itwo copies of the contract for continuance of their examin- ; iing services for the City during 1962-63. : hhe Council was informed the City entered into a contract : :for the 1961-62 year. / There is a nominal fee charged, de- : !pending upon the services rendered. t : I I b y common consent it was agreed that the City Manager Pro i 3empore be authorized to execute the contract on behalf of i :the City of Carlsbad. I : : I Audit of City Records and Water Department. The City FIna- i lger requested that the firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.; be authorized to Audit the City Records and the Water Depart: bent. By common consent it was agreed that the firm of Peqt!, barwick, Mitchell & Co. be authorized to conduct the yearly ! budit for the City. I I : i i : i : : I : : : ; 8:: : : : ; : 8 ! : : : ; I ; I : ; ; t : : t : ; ' : i 4 : : I : : : : , : : : : : : ' I : : : : : 6:; : : 8 : : i ; : t : ; : : , : ; ; : ; : : : : : : : I : ; : ; : 4 ' 1 t , : : ‘ : , f f : : I : I : : : f I : ! I : : 8 I : Engineering Department Budget. The Council was informed : : i; : i I : ; I : : : : : I phat through inadvertency, a survey wagon was omitted under i : : : : Fapital Cutlay:for the Engineering Department. i ; , Theyzare i I : : : ; I : : pilling to forego some of the other itnms under Capital Out-; ’ I : : : 1 I : : : 3.ay; however, this will mean an additional S6CO.00 that will: : : : I I ; have to be added to their budget. By motion of the Council Pt was agreed that the Engineering Department’s budget be i : ; : ; : ; : : I : : ; pdjusted by the addition of $600.00 for the purchase of a : 1 Bierce : I, 8 I ; : ; ;xI ox: burvey wagon, I and that some of the other items listed under bapital Outlay now be deleted. ! Neiswender ; \ xi xi : : ; Hughes I : 1x: i I ; I 1 : ::; ; ’ , : : The annual confer- : : ’ i I : i i knee will be held in Los Angeles this year from October Zlst! : : : : : ; : bo October 24th. The City Manager stressed that reservation! : ; : I : ; be Fade well in advance. : ; : : : ’ 4 : I : : : s I , : : : : : : ihe*Mayor requested a data sheet of the conference be pre- t ’ I : i : ’ 4 I : : I ; : : : bared-and sent to each member of the Council. t 8 : : ; : I ; : I : b , 1 : 8 : I : I eal Estate Signs. Cmn. Hughes stated this ordinance has I : : : : : : I Freated quite a hardship on home owners, i.e. service per- i f : ; I 1 : : : : : , : : ponnel who have had to move from the area. In checking ; : : kround most of the property owners do not object but feel ; : : I : : they would be penalized if they could not: depend on the real: 1: :, : ’ : : : : : : : : : I &state agents. : Also, the Realtors are being harmed. * , 1 , : ’ :,I : I : : 1 : : : ’ 1 ; 4 : pKl. I Bierce informed the Council the Realty Board appro)xed ; I : : : i I I : ’ : ; : this ordinance at the time it was presented. I : : : , : : : :, , ihe Mayor requested this matter deferred until the next reg-i I : : : : ; : f I : : ; +lar meeting. I : ; : ; : : I : : : : : : ’ t : ! : , : : : : : : ; ; I : : : : ; I : : 8 : I : : f : : : : ; : : I : ; ! ‘ I : ; : I : ! t . i I ,““““‘--““““-‘-“-“-“‘----------------”--------------------”---------------*,- I RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: I I I Ratification of the payment of bills was given for the geni era1 expenses of the City in the amount of $97,825.76, and! for the Water Department- in the amount of $2,371.65, for I the period of June 6, 1962 to June 19, 1962, as certified i by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing i Committee. : I I Ratification of the payroll was given for the first half ofl, i : I : : I I : : : : I 1 : : I I t : : I : t I I : I I I : I : I I : I I : : I I : : I I I I 9 I I I 1 I 0 1 I : I I : ! 4 : t I I I I I : : : : : : I I , 1 t , : I : I I I : : : : 1 : I : * : I : : : I 8 : : t : 1 : : I 4 June, 1962, in the amount of $14,764.29, as the Director of Finance and approved by the Committee. certified by Auditing ADJOURNMENT : By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 P.M. MARGARET E. ADAMS Deputy City Clerk ;) !‘;:, ! :; ;>;: cAA.AFC:l?.~:!A ) C<,t.IX'f'l' of; .SA!\ i-.l!E(;i) ) ss ::r-b‘Y OF (;A 32 i.S?iA 0 ) 0 : I : : : : : : : : I : I : : : : : t I : : : : : : : 8 : 4 f : : : : I : 8 I .‘1. I : : : I : * I ($1: AL) 0: Carisbac?, Cal& I . -’ COST t%iRYIa CoIsTRAm AGREI!ML.- FORMA TEISAGREWENT, nade and entered into this day of lga by and between the S!CATE PERSORRl3L ROARD, thrcrugh ed, qualified and acting Executi of the first part, hereinafter called the Roard, and the party of the second Part, hereinafter called the Local Age That the Parties, for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations expressed, and pursuant to authority contained in Section 18'iYY7, Govermnent Code, hereby agree to the conditions as follows and as found in attached and hereby incoqorated Cost Service Contract Form A, Rales and Procedures: A. In consideration of the perfomanc e by the Board of the Form Test servllces as set forth in Section IV of the aforementioned, Cost Service Contract Form A, Rules and Procedures, the Local Agency agrees to reimburse the Board in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth in the following Schedule A or Schedule B whichever is applicable: Schedule A (Bard scored and l%mber of Booklets Ordered tabulated& 1to 10 $25.00 minknurn charge ll to 100 Minimum charge plus gG# per booklet over 10 101 or more Schedule B (Scored b~Looal. Agency) $15.00 mizxLmm oharge ~ininnnn charge plus 658 per booklet over 10 (Lower rates available for quantities over 200) *Additional charge of 659 per candidate for scoring of typing performance tests -and $1.00 per candidate for scoring of stenographer performance tests, Cost A (Revised 1963) 4 B. In consideration of the performance by the Board of the Continuous Testing Services employing Form Tests as set forth in Section I(m) the Local Agency agrees to reimburse the Board the sum of $50.00 for each &xx Test supplied the Local Agency for use on a continuous testing basis. c. The Board shall, as a normal course of action, submit invoices covering those services rendered during a calendar month and the Local Agency agrees to pay such invoices within 60 days following receipt thereof. The term of this agreement will continue until terminated by either party upon giving the other party 30 days' wrztten notice of termination. Cost A (Revised 1963) L - *, / STATE OF CA RONALD REAGAN, Governor UFORNIA / CALlFORNlA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES 801 Capitol Mall Sacramento 95814 714 W. Olympic Blvd. Los Angeles 90015 Los Angeles. California June 1, 1967 -!! j“.\ J ” / P Mr. John D. Slater, City Manager City of Carlsbad 2960 Pio Pica Drive Carlsbad, California DearMr. Slater: We note some of you are still using our old address. In case you don't have our new address it is: Cooperative Personnel Services 714 West Olympic Boulevard, Room 645 Los Angeles, California 90015 The new Southern California Manager of Cooperative Personnel Services, as of June 5, 1967, is Mr. John R. Emery. Thank you. Very truly yours, G J ,.k l f i 1 I [- (, . \ /‘J !‘; !- ~;:~-;/,. ‘1 ‘- Robert W. Fischer Southern California Manager RWF:pr I - _’ ’ m- c COST SERVICE CONTRACT AGREEMENT THIS AGi&EMENT, made and entered into this 6th day of July 19 77 , at Sacramento, County of Sacramento, State of California, by and between the STATE PERSONNEL BOAED, through Its duly appointed, qualified and acting Executive Officer or his authorited representative, hereinafter called the Board, and the City of Carlsbad, California , hereinafter called the Local Agency. WITNESSETH That the parties, for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations expressed, and pursuant to authority contained in Section 18707, Government Code, hereby agree to the conditions as found In attached “Cost Services Contract Rules and Procedures” marked as Exhibit A and “Written Examination Price List” marked as Exhibit B which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. &hibit B may be amended by the Board from time to time without renegotiating the contract. Further, the parties agree that the Board shall, as a normal course of action, submit invoices covering those services rendered during a calendar month and the Local Agency agrees to pay such invoices within thirty days following receipt thereof. The provisions of the attached Fair Employment Practices Addendum, Standard Form 3 (4/65), are incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. The term of the contract commances Julr 6, 1977 and terminates hlv 5, 1980 ;. This contract may be terminated by either party upon giving the other party 30 ‘days written notice of termination. .:‘. . . . . *+.i, * ; ‘. ‘ - ” I .’ ” L In the event:.of, %emaination, the,Board will be paid such amount as is due under the contract to and incla the effective d&e of termination. : ‘. STATE PWSONNEL BCNRJJ , *er, Cooperative Personnel Services Title LcmLAGElvcY City of Carlsbad Name of Agency er Title 1 2 3 4 5 _* c-- L RESOLUTION NO. 5130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES DIVISION, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PERFORMING EMPLOYEE SCREENING EXAMINATION SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. 6 WHEREAS, the city utilizes the services of the California 7 State Personnel Board, Cooperative Personnel Services Division 8 for examining services; and 9 WHEREAS, the present agreement with the State of California r1o for such services has expired; 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the 12 13 City of Carlsbad as follows: 1. That the above facts are true and correct. 14 2. That the City Manager, Paul D. Bussey, is hereby l5 authorized and directed to sign an agreement with the State of l6 California, California State Personnel Board, Cooperative 17 Personnel Services Division, for the purpose of performing 18 examining services for the City of Carlsbad effective as of the lg date of this resolution. 20 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 21 22 23 24 25 2611 27 Carlsbad.City Council held on the 5th day of Julv # 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmen Frazee, Lewis, Packard, Skotnicki and Councilwoman Casler NOES: None ABSENT: None R&BEET-C.-FRAZEE, Meor ATTEST: -e . I 1 -. . m’ .I . *. ‘._ .* A. ‘1 *. at”. ,,~. .. . STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. QVJRGARET E. ADAMS ‘City Clerk of the City of Carlslxd, County of San Diego, State of California, . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-...-...............-. hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original ..Reso.!.Ll.t~.on..ff5!.30.. l>ilssed and adopted by said City Council, at ______ R!?~!A~M.~.~..~ _____._____ meeting thereof, at tlie time and by tilt. vote thcrc-in stated, which original . . ..___.__ k.?.SQ.k&~.QlI _._______ is now on file in my off&: that the SIWW contains a full, tmc- *and correct ttxnscript thc~rc~frorn and of the whole tht~reof. . .Witness my Ilald and the seal of said City of CWlSlXld, this .!..?th day Of . .._........._._? . . . . . . .._._.. I . . .._.__ _ . . . . . . . . . . .._. _.. July 1977 . STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor -. _.- --- CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES DIVISION COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES First Floor, 909- 12th Street Socromento 95014 (916) 322-4156 714 W. Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles 90015 Sacramento California July 25, 1677 . Ms. Margaret E. Adams City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 . Dear Ms. Adams: We are pleased to return to you the executed copies of the contracts between your agency and the State Personnel Board for examining services. Very truly yours, Enclosure (1) Carolyn A. Sears Contract Supervisor CPS-2/77 .’ COST SERV ICE CONTRACT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEHENT, made and entered into this SIXTH . day of JULY ig 80 , at Sacramento, County of Sacramento, State of Cal I fornia, by and between the STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, th.rough its duly appointed, qualified and acting Executive Officer or his authorized representative, hereinafter called the Board, and the CITY OF CARLSBAD 9 hereinafter called A the Local Agency. WITNESSETH That the parties, for and in consideration of the convenants, conditions, agreements , and stipulations expressed, and pursuant to authority contained in Section 18707, Government Code, hereby agree to the conditions as found in attached “Cost Services Contract Rules and Procedures” marked as Exhibit A and ‘!Written Examination Price List” marked as Exhibit B which are incorporated . herein by reference and made a part hereof. Exhibit B may be amended by the Board from time to time without reriegotiating the contract. Further, the parties agree that the Board shall, as a normal course of action, submit invoices covering those services rendered during a calendar month and the Local Agency agrees to pay such invoices within thirti days + foi lowing receipt thereof. The provisions of the attached Fair Employment Practices Addendum, Standard Form 3 (4/65), are incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. The term of the contract cormtences JULY 6, 1980 and terminates JULY 5, 1983 . This contract may be terminated by either party upon giving the other party 30 days written notice of termination. CPS-2 Page I x In the event of termination, the Board will be paid such amount as is due under the contract to and including the effective date of termination. . CPS-2 (4/78) Page 2 . STATE PERSONNEL BOARD BY Hanager, Cooperative Personnel Services Ti tie LOCAL AGENCY . CITY OF CARLSBm - Name of Agency BY Name FRANK ALESHIRE Citv Manaqer Title . . 1 2 3 4 ’ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 33 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 . i. RESOLUTION NO. 6255 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MAHAGER TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, COOPERATIVE PERSONNELSERVICES DIVISION, FOR THE PURPdsE OF PERFORMING EMPLOYEE SCREENING EXAMINATION SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. WHEREAS, the city utilizes the services of the California State Personnel Board, Cooperative Personnel Services Division for examining services: and WHEREAS, the present agreement with the State of California for such services has expired: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 1. That the above facts are true and correct. 2. That the City Manager, FRANK ALESHIRE, is hereby ~ authorized and directed to sign an agreement with the State of ' California, . California State Personnel Board, Cooperative i Personnel Services Division, for the purpose of performing examining services for the City of Carlsbad effective as of the date of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at's regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council held on the 5th day of August , 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Packard, Casler, Anear and Kulchin NOES: None I ABSENT: Council Member Lewis ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk I (SEAL) I 4: * L?’ . j- I .c COST SERVICE CONTRACT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this SIXTH day of JULY 19 *o , at Sacramento, County of Sacramento, State of Cal 1 fornla, by and between the STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, through its duly appointed, qualified and acting Executrve Officer or his authorized representative, hereinafter called the Board, and the CITY OF CARLSBAD , heretnafter called the Local Agency. W ITNESSETH That the parties, for and in consideration of the convenants, conditions, agreemonts, and stipulations expressed, and pursuant to authority contained ’ in Section 18707, Government Code, hereby agree to the conditions ‘as found in attached “Cost Services Contract Rules and Procedures” marked as Exhibit A and ‘Written Examination Price List” marked as Exhibit B which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Exhibit B may be amended by the Board from time to time without renegotlatlng the contract. Further, the parties agree that the Board shall, as a normal course of action, submit invoices covering those services rendered during a calendar month and the local Agency agrees to pay such invoices within tht tty days fol Iawing receipt thereof. The provisions of the attached Fair Employment Practices Addendum, Standard Form 3 (‘t/65), are incorporated by reference and made a part of ‘this contract. The term of the contract commences JULY 6, 1980 and term1 na tes JULY 5, 1983 . This contract may be terminated by either party upon giving- the other party 30 days written notice of termlnation- CPS-2 Page 1 I- -m ‘* c 1 -, In the event of termination, the Board will be paid such amount as is due under the contract to and Including the effective date of termination. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD Manager, C&operative Personnel Services Title LOCAL AGENCY b CITY OF m Name of Agency FRANK ALESHIRE City Manaqer Title CPS-2 (4/78) Page 2 . .L / 1 2 3 4 '5 . - RESOLUTION NO. 6255 - ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AUTIIORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN AGREEklENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, COOPERATIVE PERSONNELSERVICES DIVISION, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PERFORMING EMPLOYEE SCREENING EXAMINATION SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. II WHEREAS, the city utilizes the services of the California 6 State Personnel Board, Cooperative Personnel Services Division 7 for examining services; and 8 WHEREAS, the present agreement with the State of California 9 for such services has expired: 10 31 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 12 II 1. That the above facts are true and correct. 13 .2 . That the City Manager, FRANK ALESHIRE, is hereby 14 authorized and directed to sign an agreement with the State of 15 California, California State Personnel Board, Cooperative 16 Personnel Services Division, for the purpose of performing 17 examining services for the City of Carlsbad effective as of the 18 . date of this resolution. 19 II PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at'a regular meeting of the 20 II Carlsbad City Council held on the 5th day of Aqust , 1980, 21 II by the following vote, to wit: 22 23 AYES: Council Members Packard, Caslcr, Anear and Kulchin NOES: None 24 25 ABSENT : Counci 1 Member Lewis 2-j ATTEST: ii’ &&u<*~ . I City Cicrk -7 r )&-iz&GQ. RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor‘--- (SEAL) WVRITE IT-DON’T SA\ iT INTER-DEPARTMENT MEhnORANDUM A.M. TO File DATE 6-23 19 83 P. M. Re: Cooperative Agreement - Personnel Services State of.California Personnel Board Original A'Greement given to Virginia Schuldt, (~~r~onriej. this date for transmittal to the State. K. REPLY ON THIS SHEET FROM WILMER -sEawE” lpc STANDARD ,NTCR DEPT. MEMO FORM I,--24-m COST SERVICE CONTRACT ‘AGREEMENT TH I S AGREEHENT, made and entered into this 20th day of JUNE 13 83 , at Sacramento, County of Sacramento, State of Cal ifornia, by and between the STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, through . . its duly appointed, qualified and acting Executive Officer or his authoriaed representative, heretnafter called the Board, and the CITY OF CARLSBAD , hereinafter called the Local Agency. WITNESSETH That the parties, for and In constderation of the convenants, conditions, agree&men ts , and stjpulations expressed, and Pursuant tb authority contained in Section 18707, Government Code, hereby agree to the conditions as found in attached “Cost Services Contract Rules and Procedures” marked as Exhibit A and “Written txamination Price List” marked. as Exhibit ‘B which are incorporated hereln by reference and made a part hereof. Exhibit B may be amended by the Board from time to time without renegotiating the contract.. Further, the parties agree that the Board shall, as a normal course of action, submit invoices covering those services rendered during a calendar month and the Local Agency agrees to pay such invoices within thirty days foi lowing receipt thereof. The provislons of the attached Fair Empioyment Practices Addendum, Standard Form 3 (8177). .are tncorporotsd by reference and made a part of this contract. . The term of the contract corrunenccs July- 6, 1983 and termi na tes -_I_ July 5, 1986 . This contract may be terminated by either party upon giving the other party 30 days written notice of termination. CPS-2 Page 1 ..3 . -. .-. - . ..” -’ %. i ‘i, -’ . , . . w - In the event of termination,,the Board wJi1 be paid such amount as is due under the contract to and including the effective date of termination. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD Manager, Cooperative Personnel Services Ti tie LOCAL AGENCY CITY OF CARLSBAD BY FRANK ALEsHIRE Name cf’s-2 h/78) Page 2 City Manaser Title c .