HomeMy WebLinkAboutCampbell, Mary Lane and Kurtz, Russell; 2008-03-07;224-544-2000 HSBC 02:24:00 p.m. 06-26-2008 . 2/7
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CARLSBAD AND REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL
MANAGEMENT. INC. REGARDING PRESERVATION OF LITIGATION RIGHTS
This Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into effective as of the date of
the latest signature below by and among Real Estate Collateral Management, Inc. ("RECM") on
the one hand, and the City of Carlsbad ("City") on the other hand, (individually, a "Party";
collectively, the "Parties") with reference to the following facts:
RECITALS
A. In March 2005, a slope located behind Claimants' real property located at 7550
Agua Dulce Court and 7551 Agua Dulce Court (the "Homes") slid, causing a landslide (the
"Landslide") which damaged both Homes, and which Landslide the City subsequently caused to
be repaired (the "Slope Stabilization Earthwork and Subdrainage Installation").
B. RECM and the City allege that the Landslide was caused by natural events,
including unusually heavy rains.
C. Owners of the Homes have alleged that RECM, and the City, among others,
may have collectively been responsible for some of the conditions which contributed to the
damages to the Homes caused by the Landslide.
D. Each Party disputes any such allegations.
E. Owners of the Homes did not file litigation, but the Parties, along with others,
entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which RECM paid settlement monies and the
Parties released each other as set forth hi an executed Settlement Agreement. ("Settlement
Agreement")
F. As a result of the Landslide, the City caused certain repairs to be made on the
slope behind the Homes, and received certain reimbursements of funds spent on those repairs from
the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA"). The primary reason the City agreed to release
RECM pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, was the City's receipt of the FHWA reimbursement
monies. Effective March 7,2008, RECM and its insurance carrier agreed to pay nine hundred
ninety eight thousand dollars ($998,000) to the Owners of the Homes pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement. The City paid no money to the Owners of the Homes under the Settlement Agreement.
G. City represents and warrants mat it has, to date, complied with all
administrative requirements set forth by FHWA, and the City further represents and warrants that
it has had successful audits to date by FHWA and has been commended for its construction
contract adrninistration by FHWA in relation to the FHWA reimbursement program, known as the
FIRE Program established via FHWA Order 45601 A,
H. This Agreement is now entered into between the Parties solely in order to
preserve the City's right to make claims against RECM, as to the cause of the Landslide, despite
the releases set forth in the Settlement Agreement, in the event FHWA demands that the
reimbursement monies be returned to FHWA.
Page 1 of 6
224-544-2000 HSBC 02:24:24 p.m. 06-26-2008 3'/7
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained in this Settlement Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound by the terms of
this Settlement Agreement, the Parties do hereby expressly agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
Section 1.01. City represents, warrants and agrees to continue to comply with all
administrative requirements associated with the reimbursements by FHWA. City presently has no
reason to believe that any of the reimbursement monies will be requested by FHWA to be returned
to FHWA. A breach of this provision by the City is a material breach of this Agreement and a
complete defense to any claims, pursuant to Section 1.02 below, by the City against RECM
associated with the Landslide or any required reimbursement of FHWA funds by the City.
Section 1.02. RECM hereby agrees that in the event City is required to return the
reimbursement monies to FHWA, City may make claims against, and may file any appropriate
legal action against RECM concerning, or related in any way to, the cause of the Landslide, and the
respective fault, responsibility, and/or liability of the Parties as to the cause of the Landslide.
In the event that the City makes any claims against RECM related to the Landslide or any
refund of FHWA monies, RECM may make any claims against, and may file appropriate legal
action against, the City concerning, or related in any way to the Landslide, the cause of the
Landslide,the respective fault, responsibility and/or liability of the Parties as to the cause of the
Landslide and any of the City's actions or remedial work associated with the Landslide, including,
without limitation, whether such work was necessary, reasonable and performed in a cost efficient
manner
For this purpose, and under the conditions set forth above only, the Parties hereby
waive their rights to assert any defenses based upon any otherwise applicable statute of limitations
or any defense based upon the lapse or passage of time. All of the Parties defenses other than those
based upon statutes of limitations or the lapse or passage of time are otherwise preserved and may
be asserted in the event of any such claim and/or litigation relating to or concerning the Landslide.
Section 1.03. Within 5 business days from the date the Parties execute this
Agreement, the City agrees to release RECM's bond SP 7978 in the original amount of $3,262,529
and of the current amount of $1,631,265, and within seven business days from the the date the
Parties execute this agreement to return to RECM, with any interest due, RECM's cash deposit of
$10,000
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 2.01. Attorneys Fees and Costs. All Parties shall bear their own fees and
costs associated with the preparation of this Agreement, except as provided under separate
agreements between them.
Page 2 of 6
224-544-2000 HSBC 02:24:49 p.m. 06-26-2008 4,7
Section 2.02. Successors and Assigns; Third-party Beneficiaries.
(i) Except as otherwise expressly limited herein, the provisions hereof
shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the successors and assigns of the Parties hereto,
(ii) Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, nothing in this
Agreement is intended to confer upon any party other than the Parties and their respective
successors and assigns any rights, remedies, obligations, or liabilities under of by reason of this
Agreement.
Section 2,03, Covenant Not to Sue. The Parties hereby covenant that they have
not filed (other than the Arbitration and the Lawsuit) and shall not file, prosecute, pursue or assist
others in pursuing any claim, lawsuit or other proceeding against the other Party on their own
behalf or in a representative capacity on behalf of any other person or entity with respect to the
claims released herein.
Section 2.04, Attorneys' Fees for Enforcement Action. In the event any action is
filed to enforce, defend or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party hi such action shall be
entitled to, in addition to any other damages or relief available to them, an award of reasonable
attorneys' and paralegals' fees and costs incurred in connection with such action, including in any
bankruptcy or appellate proceeding,
Section 2.05. Advice of Counsel. In executing this Agreement, each Party hereto
acknowledges that it has consulted with and has had the advice of counsel of its own choosing in
negotiations for and preparation of this Agreement and has been fully advised by counsel with
respect to all rights which are affected by this Agreement Each Party hereto acknowledges that its
counsel played a role in drafting this Agreement and that this Agreement should be construed
neutrally as if jointly drafted by all the Parties, and not be construed in favor of or against any Party
based on the origin of the language used.
Section 2.06. Choice of Law. This Agreement is made and entered into in the
State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced, and governed under the laws
of the State of California as if entirely performed within the State of California, California law
shall apply without regard to any conflict of laws. The language in all parts of this Agreement
shall in all cases be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against
any of the Parties.
Section 2.07. Pre-Litigation Non-Binding Mediation. Any dispute, claim or
controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach, termination, enforcement,
interpretation or validity thereof, including the determination of the scope or applicability of this
agreement to mediate, shall be first be, as a mandatory pre-requisite to filing any action in the
Superior Courts of this State, submitted by the Parties to a mediation before a mediator agreed
upon by the Parties. If the Parties cannot mutually agree to the selection of a mediator, they agree
that, upon request by either Party, a mediator shall be appointed by JAMS from the JAMS panel of
jurists/mediators with construction industry experience. The fees of the mediator shall be paid in
equal shares by the Parties. As soon as practicable after the mediator is selected or appointed, the
Parties shall participate in good faith in said mediation. If the mediator, in his/her discretion, after
Page 3 of 6
224-544-2000 HSBC 02:25:20 p.m. 06-26-2008 511
diligent efforts towards voluntary resolution, determines that the parties to the mediation are
unable to agree on a resolution, the mediator shall make a recommendation, in writing, as to a
suggested resolution. The mediator's suggested resolution shall be non-binding, and
notwithstanding and without regard to such recommendation, any party shall be entitled to
commence an action in the nature described in section 1.02 above.
Section 2.08. After-Acquired Facts. The Parties acknowledge mat they might
hereafter discover facts different from or in addition to those they now know or believe to be true
with respect to a claim or claims released herein, and they expressly agree to assume the risk of
possible discovery of additional or different facts, and agree mat this Agreement shall be and
remain effective in all respects regardless of such additional or different discovered facts, or any
change in circumstances.
Section 2.09. Authority. Each of die Parties represents, warrants and covenants
that it has the power to settle and release fully and completely all claims, causes of action, demands,
charges and liabilities asserted against the other Party. The Parties have not assigned, subrogated
or in any other way transferred to anyone else any portion of any claim they have or had against
each other.
Section 2.10. Review of Agreement. Each Party to this Agreement certifies that it
has read all of this Agreement and fully understands all of the same.
Section 2.11. Cooperation in Implementation. Each Party to this Agreement will
cooperate and diligently perform any further acts, deeds and things and execute and deliver any
documents that may from time to time be reasonably necessary or otherwise reasonably required to
consummate, evidence, confirm and/or carry out the intent and provisions of this Agreement, all
without undue delay or expense and without further consideration.
Section 2.12. Notices.etc, All notices and other communications required or
permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be (1) mailed by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, (2) delivered by reliable overnight courier service, or (3) otherwise delivered by
hand or by messenger, addressed as follows:
(i) KECM
Stuart Richter, Esq.
Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600
Los Angeles, California 90067-3012
Tel: 310-788-4582
Fax: 310-812-8434
stuart.richter@kattenlaw.com
(ii) The City
Ronald Kemp, Esq.
Office of the City Attorney
Page 4 of 6
224-544-2000 HSBC 02:25:44 p.m. 06-26-2008 6/7
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Tel: 760-434-2891
Fax: 760-434-8367
rkemp @ ci.carlsbad.ca.us
Mitchell D. Dean, Esq.
Daley & Heft
462 Stevens Ave., Suite 201
Tel: 858-755-5666
Fax: 858-755-7870
mdean® daley-heft.com
Section 2.13. Counterparts and Facsimile. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts and via facsimile with the same force and effect as if executed in one complete
document. Any Party executing this Agreement by facsimile shall provide the other Party with an
originally executed Agreement within five (5) calendar days.
Section 2.14 Severability. If any clause or provision of this Agreement is held to
be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under any law applicable to the terms hereof, then the
remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby.
~~ Section 2.15. No Waiver. Failure to insist on compliance with any term, covenant
or condition contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that term, covenant or
condition, now shall any waiver or relinquishment of any right or power contained in this
Agreement at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of any right or
power at any other time or times.
Section 2.16. Binding Effect This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective representatives, successors and assigns;
provided, however, the foregoing shall not be deemed or construed to confer any right, title,
benefit, cause of action or remedy upon any person or entity not a party hereto, which such party
would not nor did not otherwise possess.
Section 2.17 Authority to Bind Party. Each person or entity executing this
Agreement on behalf of any Party or entity individually represents and warrants that they are duly
authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such Party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement.
RECM
company
Its:
Page 5 of 6 n
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RONALD R. BALL
BY:
Deputy City Attorney
Page 6 of 6
City of Carlsbad
5950 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, CA 92009
February 19, 2(M)7
Contract No.: 89583
Attention: Mr. Skip Hammann, P.E.
Subject: As-Graded Compaction Report
Project: Rancho Santa Fc Road Phase 1
Slope Stabilization
Carlsbad, CA
References: I. "Geotechnical Investigation & l-'ield Review, Rancho Santa Fe Road Phase I
Roadway Slope Stabilization ". Contract No. 89583, April 17. 2006, prepared by
Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. (TESD).
Dear Mr. Hammann:
In accordance with your request, Testing Engineers — San Diego, Inc. (TESD) has conducted
observations during grading and subdrain installation, as well as compaction testing for the above
referenced project site. Services described herein were provided by TESD from March 21, 2005 to
January 15,2007.
A representative of this office observed the excavation of all slide debris from the slope failure
extending to a depth ranging from 280 to 300 feet MSL at (he above referenced project site. In
order to provide appropriate subdrainage for the remedial slope, a subrain system was installed.
extending from the keyway bottom at an invert elevation of 280 feet MSL to the existing storm
drain along Esfera Street. Four horizontal drains with invert elevations ranging from 288 to 300
feet MSL were installed along the east end of the slope failure. The four horizontal drains were
installed in order to provide communication between the regraded slope subdrain and the new
Rancho Santa Fe Road rock fill prism. Rcgrading of the slope followed the removal of slide
debris, keyway over-excavation, and installation of subdrainage elements (note: including
geogrid and gravel). Fill placed within the shored keyway was placed, compacted, and tested for
90 percent relative compaction. Grading operations for Agua Dulce Court and a pedestrian
walkway southeast of the top-of-slope were also observed. The subgrade for these paved areas
were scarified 8 inches, moisture conditioned and re-compacted to 95 percent of the maximum
dry density. Rock base was then placed and compacted over the subgrade, the capped with
asphaltic concrete per plan.
Compaction test locations are presented on Plot Plan Nos. 1 to 3. Summaries of laboratory and
field compaction test results are provided in Appendix A. Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The fill
materials were placed, compacted, and tested for compliance with a minimum 90 and 95 percent
relative compaction requirement, as ap
.'ing Engineers San Diego, Inc.
?8!>'i < i
ii/^Lo. J.B1 1
...••.
Rancho Santa Fe Road Phase 1
Slope Stabilization
Contract No. 89583
It should be noted that the precision of the field and laboratory maximum dry density test results
are subject to variation inherent with testing procedures and heterogeneous material
characteristics. Quantitative values of testing precision have been documented by the American
Society of Testing and Materials. For example, results indicate the accuracy of the ASTM D-
1557 test to be plus or minus 2 percent of the mean density. Based on this information, relative
compaction results should be interpreted as approximate values subject to variations in lateral
and vertical directions.
Survey lines and elevations relative to grade modifications, final design grades, locations of
various elements, etc., were established by others.
Field Monitoring services provided by this office, consisting of visual observation of subdrain
installation, compaction operations and random in-place density tests, are intended as assistance
to the owner/client in monitoring apparent reasonable compliance with the project earthwork and
paving specifications. The presence of our field representative during the work progress did not
involve any direct supervision of the contractor/subcontractor. Technical advice and suggestions
were provided upon request based upon the results of the tests and observations. In any case, no
warranty or responsibility for the contractor's performance is intended or implied.
Based on the observations and testing made during construction by TESD representatives, it is our
opinion that the slope stabilization earthwork and subdrainage installation were constructed in
general conformance with the project specifications and are considered suitable for the intended
use. If you should have any questions after reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to contact
the undersigned at (858) 715-5800.
Sincerely,
Testing Engineers—San Diego, Inc.
A Bureau Veritas Company
Nick Tracy, EIT
Staff Engineer
VanW.OIin,GE25
Principal Geotechnical Engl
Attachments:
NT/VO:mm
Distribution:
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Plot Plan I
Figure 3: Plot Plan 2
Figure 4: Plot Plan 3
Appendix A: Table 1 and Table 2
*(4) Addressee
* Includes copies for building department submittal
FIGURES
f 30'
II
SITE LOCATION
I
— ,--
.>-
SCALE
1:24000
Ref: USGS 7.5 minute Rancho Santa Fe Quadrangle, latest rev 1983.
NOTE: This figure may contain areas of color. TE-U.S. Labs cannot be
responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of Ihe information result-
ing from black and white reproductions of this figure.
Testing
tf|i ' 7!
TP!" CR*i
Engineers - U.S. Labs, Inc.
395 Convoy Court, Suite 18
San Diego, CA 92111
8)715-5800 Fax:(858)715-5810
Title Site Location Map
Project: Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Phase 1
Drwn: D.M.M
Date:
January, 2007
Contract No: 89583
Figure:
1
SCALE 1" * 40'
LEGEND:
C^pTest uocasons fapprcs )
• - Project LjmrS (appro*.)
—— Uppsr Subdraln
(InvertB 300'MSU
Lower Subdrain
(Invert El. 288' MSL)
FOR SCHEMATIC USE ONLY - NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
Testing Engineers San Diego
7895 Convoy Court. Surie 18
SanQeso, CA92111
Tel. (BS6)71S-SBOO Fax: (658) 715-5S10
Plot Plan #1
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Phase 1
Contract No 6S5S3
Figure No
Reference: "fianefto Santa F« Ro«tf Stope StabSfoetion Finished Grading and Tmll Plan.' DmwmaM35-9A, Sheet #6, Berryman S Henlgar
7_~..-"~- ---•-i
SCALE 1" « 40'
LEGEND:
'357>T»st Locations (epprox.i
FOR SCHEMATIC USE ONLY - NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
Reference: 'Ranctoo Santa Fe Road Stops Stabilization Finished Grating and Trail Plan,' Drawng *!35-9A SfiatstSP. Betryman & Henigar
§Testing Engineers San Diego
78S5 Convoy Court. Suite 18
San Diego, CA 92111
rrlii^ Tel. (856)715-5800 Fax: (8SB! 715-5810
™" Plot Plan #2
Project Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Phase 1
Own D.M.M.
Date January 2007
Contract No: 89583
Hgur* No:
o
V
SCALE V* 40'
LEGEND:
Coinpactton Test Locations (approxj
FOR SCHEMATEC USE ONLY - NOT A CONSTRUCTION DSAWfNG
Reference. 'Runcha Sanfg Fe /?oad StojDe Stsbiltzatton Finished Grading a/Td 7m// Plon" Drawsns ^435-9A Sheet #5, Berry man £ Henig
£Testing Engineers San Diego
7B95 Convoy Court, Suite 18
San Dleao.CA 87111
Tel (856) 71M800 Fax (858) 715-5610
Title Plot Plan #3
Project Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Phase 1
Own D.M.M
Dam January 2007
Contract No 89583
Figure No
4
APPENDIX A
City of"Carlsbad Contract No,: 89583
RSF Phase I Road Slide Repair
TABLE I
RESULTS OF MAXIMUM DENSITY TESTS
(ASTM-D-1557)
SAMPLE fi DESCRIPTION MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM MOISTURE
DENSITY (PCF) CONTENT (%)
1
2
3
4
4 R/C
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
23
Import: Brown Clayey SAND
Import: Brown Clayey SAND
Import: Brown Silty SAND w/ Gravel
Import: Brown Silty SAND
Import: Brown Clayey SAND w/ Gravel
On-site: Brown Clayey SAND w/ Gravel
On-site: Brown Silty SAND w/ Gravel
Import: Clayey SAND w/ Gravel
Import: Rock Base
Import: Brown Clayey SAND
Import: Clayey SAND w/ Silt
Import: Fine Silty SAND
Import: Silty SAND w/ Gravel
On-site: Fan Sandy SILT
On-site: Brown Silty SAND w/ Gravel
On-site: Light Brown Sandy SILT
Import: Red Silty SAND w/ Gravel
Import: Red-brown silty SAND
On-site: Tan-Brown Silty SAND w/ Gravel
Import: Class 11 base
Import: Brownish-Gray Base
115.0
118.0
129.5
136.0
141.0
133.5
135.0
134.5
142.0
125.5
124.0
123.0
143.0
119.0
133.0
116.5
129.0
126.0
135.5
144.0
142.5
15.5
14.5
11.5
7.0
7.0
8.5
7.0
8.0
6.5
11.0
11.5
9.5
6.0
13.0
6.0
13.5
8.5
1 1 .0
8.0
6.0
5.0
City of Carlsbad Contract No.: 89583
RSI-" Phase I Road Slide Repair
•25 On-site: Black/Brown Silly SAND 130.5 8.5
26 Import: Asphaltic Concrete 149.8
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number
Project Name:
Location:
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Test
#Sample #
Test
Date
Test Location Elev. (ft)
Moisture
Field
1 3 9/14/2005 6" Subdrain STA 15+60 287.0 13.6%
2 1 9/15/2005 6" Subdrain STA 16+00 between 7550 & 286.0 18.0%
Opt.
Dry Density (pcf)
Field
11.5% 119.8
15.5% 94.6
Max.
Relative Com p.
Obt.
129.5 93%
115.0 82%
Req.
Conform
Non-Conform
90% Conform
90% Nonconform
2A 1
28 1
2C 1
3 1
4 1
4A 1
5 1
6 1
6A 1
7 1
7A 1
8 1
8A 1
9 1
9A 1
10 3
11 2
9/15/2005
9/15/2005
9/15/2005
9/15/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/16/2005
9/19/2005
12 9/19/2005
7551 Agua Dulce Ct.
Retest of #2
Retest of #2
Retest of #2
6" Subdrain STA 15+80 between 7550 &
7551 Agua Dulce Ct.
6" Subdrain STA 15+86 between 7550 &
7551 Agua Dulce Ct.
Retest of #4
6" Subdrain STA 15+96 between 7550 &
7551 Agua Dulce Ct.
Adjacent SB 62 & 63
Retest of #6
Adjacent SB 58 & 59
Retest of #7
6" Subdrain STA 15+45 between 7550 &
7551 Agua Dulce Ct.
Retest of #8
Adjacent SB 60 & 61
Retest of #9
Adjacent SB 59-60
Backfill behind logging between Soldier
Beams 57 & 58 - Zamberelli
Backfill behind logging between Soldier
Beams 63 & 64 - Zamberelli
286.0 19.5% 15.5% 100.5
286.0 18.5% 15.5% 102.4
286.0 18.0% 15.5% 103.2
286-0 18.1% 15,5% 103.3
288.0 17.1% 15.5% 101.9
288.0 14.6% 15.5% 108,2
288.0 16.2% 15,5% 107,1
310.0 19.5% 15.5% 98,0
310,0 18.8% 15.5% 105.2
309.0 19.1% 15.5% 98.5
309.0 19.0% 15.5% 108.1
287,0 19.1% 15.5% 98.6
287.0 18,7% 15.5% 103.5
310.0 18.6% 15,5% 100.2
310.0 18.0% 15.5% 109,2
309.0 15.4% 11.5% 123.0
13.6% 14.5% 114.2
10.3% 14.5% 112.2
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
129,5
118.0
87%
89%
90%
90%
89%
94%
93%
85%
91%
86%
94%
86%
90%
87%
95%
95%
97%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Nonconform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
118.0 95%90%Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
22A
23
23A
24
24A
25
Sample #
2
2
2
8
1
2
8
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Test
Date
9/20/2005
9/21/2005
9/21/2005
9/21/2005
9/21/2005
9/22/2005
9/22/2005
9/22/2005
9/22/2005
9/23/2005
9/23/2005
9/26/2005
9/26/2005
9/27/2005
9/27/2005
9/27/2005
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Moisture Dry
Field Opt. Fk
Density (pcf) Relative Comp. Conform
Id Max, Obt. Req. Non-Conform
6" Subdrain system STA 14+90 on Agua 285.5 12,9% 14,5% 108.3 118,0 92% 90% Conform
Dulce Ct
6" Subdrain system STA 9+87 on Esfera St 270.0 15,9% 14,5% 107,4 118,0 91% 90% Conform
6" Subdrain system STA 9+77 on Esfera St 270,5 16.0% 14,5% 114.9 118.0 97% 90% Conform
6" Subdrain system STA 9+80 (Base) on 271,5 5.5% 6,5% 128.4 142.0 90% 95% Conform
Esfera St
6" Subdrain system STA 14+90 on Agua 285,0 17.5% 15.0% 98,8 115.0 86% 90% Nonconform
Dulce Ct
6" Subdrain System STA 9+95 on Esfera St 274.0 15,1% 14,5% 1112 118,0 94% 90% Conform
6" Subdrain System STA 10+07 on Esfera 274.5 4.1% 6,5% 137.2 142.0 97% 95% Conform
St
6" Subdrain System STA 10+11 on Esfera 274.0 14.8% 14.5% 112.1 118.0 95% 90% Conform
St
6" Subdrain System STA 10+13 on Esfera 274.0 14.6% 14.5% 110.9 118.0 94% 90% Conform
St
6" Subdrain System STA 10+48 on Dorado 278,0 20.6% 15.5% 101.9 115,0 89% 90% Nonconform
PI
Retestof#22 278.0 19.9% 15.5% 103.5 115.0 90% 90% Conform
6" Subdrain System STA 10+70 on Dorado 278.0 17,0% 15.5% 100.1 115.0 87% 90% Nonconform
PI
Retestof#23 278.0 17.4% 15.5% 105.8 115,0 92% 90% Conform
6" Subdrain System STA 11 +26 on Dorado 278.5 17.5% 15,5% 99.8 115.0 87% 90% Nonconform
PI
Retestof#24 278.5 17.7% 15.5% 104,6 115,0 91% 90% Conform
6" Subdrain System STA 11+80 on Dorado 278.0 17.7% 15.5% 103.1 115.0 90% 90% Conform
PI
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
26
27
28
29
30
30A
31
32
32A
33
33A
34
34A
35
36
37
Sample #
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
19
19
Test
Date
9/28/2005
9/28/2005
9/29/2005
9/28/2005
9/29/2005
9/29/2005
9/29/2005
9/30/2005
9/30/2005
9/30/2005
9/30/2005
10/3/2005
10/3/2005
10/3/2005
11/14/2005
11/21/2005
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Oulce
Carlsbad, California
Test Location
6" Subdrain system STA 12+10 on Agua
Dulce Ct
6" Subdrain system STA 12+25 on Agua
Dulce Ct
6" Subdrain system STA 12+55 on Agua
Dulce Ct
6" Subdrain system STA 12+79 on Agua
Dulce Ct
6" Subdrain system STA 13+04 on Agua
Dulce Ct
Retestof#30
6" Subdrain system STA 1.3+34 on Agua
Dulce Ct
6" Subdrain system STA 1 3+52 on Agua
Dulce Ct
Retestof#32
6" Subdrain system STA 13+73 on Agua
Dulce Ct
Retestof#33
6" Subdrain System STA 1 3+85 Agua Dulce
Retestof#34
6" Subdrain System STA 14+00 Agua Dulce
Ct
Storm Drain at STA 10+54 Clean Out Box G-
2
Storm Drain at STA 10+34 West Side Clean
Elev. (ft)
280.0
281,0
279.0
282.0
282.5
282.5
283.5
284.0
284,0
284.0
284.0
284.5
284.5
284.0
61.0
59.0
Moisture
Field
15.3%
11.4%
16.2%
15.9%
16,2%
17.0%
18.8%
18,9%
18.5%
17.9%
14,7%
19.9%
17.0%
17.6%
13.6%
10,3%
Opt.
15.5%
11.5%
15,5%
15.5%
15.5%
15.5%
15.5%
15.5%
15.5%
15.5%
15,5%
15.5%
15.5%
15.5%
11,0%
11.0%
Dry Density (pcf)
Field
103.1
118.8
103.5
103.4
100,1
104.6
104.2
101-2
104.6
97.3
110.8
101.8
105,7
103,5
126.0
119.0
Max.
115.0
129,5
115.0
115.0
115.0
115,0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115,0
115.0
126.0
126.0
Relative Com p.
Obt.
90%
92%
90%
90%
87%
91%
91%
88%
91%
85%
96%
89%
92%
90%
100%
94%
Req.
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Non-Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Out Box A-4
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name--
Location:
Test
it
38
39
40
41
41A
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Sample #
19
19
19
19
19
19
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Test
Date
11/21/2005
11/22/2005
1 1/22/2005
1 1/23/2005
1 1/23/2005
1 1/23/2005
2/8/2006
2/9/2006
2/9/2006
2/9/2006
2/10/2006
2/10/2006
2/13/2006
2/13/2006
2/14/2006
2/14/2006
2/14/2006
2/22/2006
2/22/2006
2/22/2006
2/24/2006
2/24/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Moisture
Field Opt.
Dry Density (pcf) Relative Comp.
Field Max. Obt. Req.
Storm Drain at STA 10*34 East Side Clean 60.0 10.7% 11.0% 121-6 126.0 97% 90%
Out Box A-4
Storm Drain at STA 11 +64 East Side Clean 57,0 10.3% 11.0% 120.3 126,0 95% 90%
Out Box A-4
Storm Drain at STA 10+54 West Side Clean 60,0 10.7% 11.0% 122.8 126.0 97% 90%
Out Box E-2
Storm Drain at STA 10+54 South Side Clean 62.0 8.7% 11.0% 112.6 126.0 89% 90%
Out Box E-2
Retestof#41 62.0 9.8% 11.0% 117.8 126.0 93% 90%
Drain Main Lateral between A-4 Clean Out 61,0 10.3% 11.0% 120.3 126.0 95% 90%
box® 10+54 & 10+31 A-4
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+68 286.0 14.5% 11. 5% 113,4 124.0 91% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+78 282.0 11.5% 11.5% 112,8 124.0 91% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+ 78 284.0 12.8% 11,5% 113.5 124.0 92% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+78 286.0 13,2% 11.5% 112.7 124.0 91% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+78 284.0 12.4% 11.5% 115,6 124.0 93% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+78 286.0 11.1% 11.5% 115.3 - 124,0 93% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+93 285,0 12.8% 11.5% 113.1 124,0 91% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+78 286.0 11.5% 11.5% 117.8 124.0 95% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+28 281.5 11.5% 11.5% 114.7 124,0 93% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+28 283.5 12.4% 11.5% 113,1 124,0 91% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+28 285.5 12.8% 11. 5% 114,8 124.0 93% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+28 281.0 13.2% 11.5% 113.5 124.0 92% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+28 283.0 12.4% 11,5% 116.5 124.0 94% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+28 285.0 11. 9% 11. 5% 115,6 124.0 93% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+02 279.5 13.6% 11.5% 114.6 124.0 92% 90%
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+02 281.5 12,8% 11.5%116.9 124.0 94% 90%
Conform
Non-Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Sample*
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Test
Date
2/24/2006
3/6/2006
3/6/2006
3/6/2006
3/7/2006
3/7/2006
3/7/2006
3/8/2006
3/8/2006
3/8/2006
3/22/2006
3/23/2006
3/27/2006
3/27/2006
3/30/2006
3/30/2006
3/31/2006
3/31/2006
5/2/2006
5/2/2006
5/2/2006
5/2/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Test Location
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 14+02
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+75
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+75
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+75
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+75
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+75
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+75
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+44
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+44
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+44
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+44
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+05
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+05
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 13+05
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 12+57
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 12+57
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 12+57
Agua Dulce 6" SD STA 12+57
Aligned at 'L' point between Soldier Beams
42&51
Aligned at 'L' point between Soldier Beams
42&53
Aligned at 'L' point between Soldier Beams
42&S5
Aligned at 'L1 point between Soldier Beams
40&51
Elev. (ft)
283.5
280.0
282,0
284.0
280,0
282.0
284,0
279.0
281.0
283.0
282.0
282.0
281,0
283.0
280,0
282,0
280.5
282.5
2870
287.0
287,0
287.0
Moisture
Field
11.1%
11,5%
12.4%
13.6%
12.4%
13,2%
11.9%
13.2%
11.5%
12.8%
13.7%
14.1%
14,1%
13.6%
13.6%
13.2%
13,6%
13.2%
5.9%
4,5%
4.1%
4.8%
Opt,
1 1 ,5%
1 1 .5%
1 1 .5%
11.5%
11.5%
11.5%
1 1 .5%
1 1 ,5%
1 1 .5%
11,5%
1 1 ,5%
1 1 .5%
1 1 .5%
1 1 ,5%
1 1 .5%
1 1 .5%
1 1 .5%
11,5%
7.0%
70%
7,0%
7.0%
Dry Density (pcf)
Field
114.8
113.0
115.1
112,8
112.7
113.9
113,6
113,2
113.9
116.6
120.4
115.2
114.1
115.0
112.6
114.8
114.9
116.1
133.3
136.4
131.9
131.1
Max.
124.0
124.0
124.0
124.0
124.0
124.0
124.0
124.0
124,0
124.0
124.0
124.0
124,0
124.0
124.0
124,0
124.0
124.0
141,0
141.0
141.0
141,0
Relative Com p.
Obt.
93%
91%
93%
91%
91%
92%
92%
91%
92%
94%
97%
93%
92%
93%
91%
93%
93%
94%
95%
97%
94%
93%
Req.
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Non-Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
Sample #
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
4
4
4
4
Test
Date
5/2/2006
512/2006
5/2/2006
5/2/2006
5/2/2006
5/2/2006
5/2/2006
5/2/2006
5/4/2006
5/4/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Moisture Dry
Field Opt Fie
Density (pcf) Relative Comp. Conform
Id Max. Obt Req. Non-Conform
Aligned at V point between Soldier Beams 287,0 5.9% 7.0% 129.7 141.0 92% 90% Conform
40&53
Aligned at 1' point between Soldier Beams 287.0 4.7% 7.0% 137.8 141,0 98% 90% Conform
40&55
Aligned at 'L' point between Soldier Beams 287.0 5.7% 7.0% 129.6 141.0 92% 90% Conform
36&51
Aligned at 'L' point between Soldier Beams 287.0 5.1% 7.0% 134.9 141,0 96% 90% Conform
3S&53
Aligned at 'L' point between Soldier Beams 287.0 4.2% 7.0% 138.3 141.0 98% 90% Conform
36&55
Aligned at 1' point between Soldier Beams 287,0 5.0% 7.0% 132.6 141.0 94% 90% Conform
31 &51
Aligned at 1' pom! between Soldier Beams 287.0 5.1% 7.0% 131.1 141.0 93% 90% Conform
31 &53
Aligned at 'L' point between Soldier Beams 287.0 5.2% 7,0% 132.7 141.0 94% 90% Conform
31 &55
Pothole compaction behind 331 8 Dorado 289.0 18.9% 15.5% 101.2 115.0 88% 90% Nonconform
Place
Retestof#89 289.0 18.1% 15.5% 103.5 115.0 90% 90% Conform
South of SB-32 adjacent Pool at STA 1 1 +50 287.5 8.1% 7.0% 115,6 136.0 85% 90% Nonconform
Retestof#91 287.5 7.9% 7,0% 126.5 136.0 93% 90% Conform
South East Of Pool at STA 11 +-20 288.0 7.1% 7.0% 114.2 136.0 84% 90% Nonconform
Retestof#93 2880 6.8% 7.0% 123.8 136.0 91% 90% Conform
95 10R/C 5/23/2006 Near previous location of SB-38 at STA
11+75
288.0 7.1% 7.0% 133.9 141.0 95%90%Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
89S83
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Test
tf Sample #
Test
Date
Test Location Elev. (ft)
Moisture
Field
96 4 5/23/2006 Near previous location of SB-37 at STA 289 0 7.9%
11+60
97 4 5/23/2006 Near previous location of SB-32 at STA 289.0 8.0%
11+25
Opt.
Dry Density (pcf)
Field
7.0% 126.5
7.0% 116.9
Max.
Relative Com p.
Obt.
136.0 93%
136.0 86%
Req.
Conform
Non-Conform
90% Conform
90% Nonconform
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
4
4
4
4R/C
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
Retest of #97
Near previous location of SB-35 at STA
11+40
Retest of #99
Near previous location of SB-40 at STA
11+90
Near previous location of SB-36 at STA
11+50
Retest of #102
Retest of #103
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
S2&24 near STA 11+10
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
52&22nearSTA11+40
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
51 &1 7 near STA 11 +62
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
51&12 near STA 12+00
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
51&7 near STA 12+35
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
289.0
289.0
289.0
289,0
288.5
288.5
288.5
289.0
289.0
289.0
288.0
287,5
288.5
7.7%
6.8%
6.7%
7.4%
6.9%
7.1%
7.4%
8.8%
7.4%
6.9%
7.5%
5.9%
6.8%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7,0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7,0%
7,0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
123.8
119.7
127,8
129.7
114.2
119.7
123.8
125.1
122,4
122,4
123.8
122.4
123.8
136.0
136.0
136.0
141.0
136.0
136.0
136.0
136.0
136.0
136.0
136.0
136.0
136.0
91%
88%
94%
92%
84%
88%
91%
92%
90%
90%
91%
90%
91%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
51&7 near STA 12+36
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
Sample #
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4
4
4R/C
4
4R/C
4
4R/C
4
4
Test
Date
5/24/2005
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/30/2006
5/30/2006
5/30/2006
5/30/2006
5/30/2006
5/30/2006
5/30/2006
5/30/2006
5/30/2006
5/31/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
T0cf 1 nraHrtn PlAw /fHi cm Lwwdiluii di5v. \il/ ^^
F
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 288.5
54&12
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 289.0
S4&66
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 288.5
52&12
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 290.0
52S66
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 290.0
52S63
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 290.0
S2&64
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 289.5
52&17
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 289.5
54&17
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 290.0
52&21
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 290.0
S3&22
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 290 .0
58S22
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 290 0
58&19
Masonry Retaining Wall (Ftg Backfill) STA 287 5
Moisture Dry Density (pcf)
ield Opt Field
6.9% 7.0% 132.5
7.0% 7.0% 131.9
5.8% 7.0% 129.7
5.4% 7.0% 133.9
6.1% 7.0% 123.4
5.4% 7.0% 126.7
5.9% 7.0% 130.2
6,1% 7.0% 123.9
6.2% 7.0% 130.8
4.7% 7.0% 127.6
7.1% 7.0% 131.1
6.8% 7.0% 127.8
7.5% 7.0% 121.5
Max.
141.0
141.0
141,0
141,0
136.0
136.0
141.0
136.0
141.0
136,0
141,0
136,0
136.0
Relative Com p.
Obt.
94%
94%
92%
95%
91%
93%
92%
91%
93%
94%
93%
94%
89%
Req.
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Non-Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
11+25
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number
Project Name
Location:
Test
#
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Sample #
4
A
A
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4R/C
4
4
Test
Date
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
M
ToCfr 1 nr*Zlfinn P (O\/ /ftl mum .[muiim-I Vat UUCdtlUn Clt?V. (IIJ mini.LLLiLiniir
Fiel(
oisture Dry Density (pcf)
i Opt. Field Max.
Masonry Retaining Wall (Ftg Backfill) STA 287.5 7.3% 7.0% 125.1 136.0
11+10
Masonry Retaining Wall (Ftg Backfill) STA 288.0 7.9% 7.0% 123.1 136.0
11+40
Masonry Retaining Wall (Ftg Backfill) STA 288.0 7,5% 7.0% 127,3 136,0
11+25
Masonry Retaining Wall (Ftg Backfill) STA 289.0 7.2% 7.0% 129,0 136.0
11+90
Masonry Retaining Wall (Ftg Backfill) STA 289.0 6.6% 7.0% 130.6 136.0
11+75
Masonry Retaining Wall (Ftg Backfill) STA 289,0 8.6% 7.0% 130.5 136.0
11+55
Masonry Retaining Wall (Ftg Backfill) STA 289.0 7.6% 7.0% 129.6 136.0
11+15
Masonry Retaining Wall (Ftg Backfill) STA 289.0 7.8% 7.0% 127.8 136.0
11+40
Aligned at 1' Point Between soldier beams 290.0 6.8% 7.0% 118,3 136.0
53&14
Retestof#132 290.0 6.9% 7.0% 102.4 136.0
Aligned at 1' Point Between soldier beams 290.0 7.2% 7.0% 123.8 136.0
53S21
Aligned at 1' Point Between soldier beams 290,0 6.7% 7.0% 125.1 136.0
55&7
Aligned at 1' Point Between soldier beams 290.0 6.5% 7.0% 132.5 141,0
53&1
Adjacent Soldier Beam 54 290,0 5.5% 7.0% 115.6 136.0
Retestof#137 290.0 7.1% 7.0% 122.4 136.0
Relative Comp.
Obt.
92%
91%
94%
95%
96%
96%
95%
94%
87%
75%
91%
92%
94%
85%
90%
Req.
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Mori-Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Test
#Sample #
Test
Date
Test Location Elev. (ft)
Moisture
Field Opt.
Dry Density (pcf)
Field Max.
Relative Com p.
Obt.Req.
Conform
Non-Conforrn
Contract Number
Project Name:
Location:
Test
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
Sample #
4
4
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
15
15
15
15
15
15
4R/C
Test
Date
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6,7/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
153 4R/C 6/8/2006
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
52&11
Retestof#139
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
53S23
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
53&19
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
53&11
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
S4&66
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
53&17
Aligned at 1' Point Between soldier beams
16&59
Retestof#146
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
22&66
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
19&66
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
21&66
Retestof#150
Aligned at V Point Between soldier beams
53&19
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams
53&15
290.0 6.8% 7.0% 111.5 136.0 82%90%Nonconform
290.0
291.5
291.5
291.0
291.5
292.0
291.5
291-5
291.5
291.5
293.5
293,5
292.0
7,0%
6.3%
6.3%
5.4%
6.1%
7.1%
15,6%
14.7%
12.8%
15.1%
15.7%
17.0%
6.4%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
13.0%
13,0%
13.0%
13.0%
13.0%
13.0%
7.0%
122,4
128.6
127.1
134.0
131,2
128.3
105,3
109.9
112.3
108,7
100.4
107.4
134.3
136.0
141,0
141.0
141.0
141.0
141.0
119,0
119.0
119.0
119.0
119.0
119,0
141.0
90%
91%
90%
95%
93%
91%
88%
92%
94%
91%
84%
90%
95%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
292.0 5.9% 7,0% 123.1 141.0 87%90%Nonconform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
Sample #
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
15
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
15
4R/C
4R/C
Test
Date
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
M
Tpr— t 1 rtMttnn Flnr fftti esi i_ocaiion ciev, jnj -
Fielc
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 292.0 6.7
53&11
aisture Dry Density (pcf)
i Opt. Field Max.
% 7.0% 132.5 141.0
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 292.0 6.9% 7,0% 128.2 141.0
54&10
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 292.0 6.7% 7.0% 132.5 141.0
53&8
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 292.0 6.9% 7.0% 129.9 141.0
S3&66
Aligned at 1' Point Between soldier beams 292.0 6. 1
53&61
% 7.0% 126.7 141.0
Adjacent Retaining wall in alignment w/ SB 291.0 6.2% 7.0% 131.1 141.0
23
Aligned at V Point Between soldier beams 293.0 17,1% 13.0% 107.3 119.0
57&9
Aligned at V Point Between soldier beams 293,0 5.3% 7.0% 124.0 141.0
S4&66
Retestof#161 293.0 5.9% 7,0% 128,3 141.0
Aligned at 'L' Point Between soldier beams 293.0 7.0% 7,0% 129.0 141.0
54&18
Adjacent wall between SB 52&1 8 293.0 6.8%- 7.0% 129.7 141.0
Adjacent wall between SB S2&22 292.5 6.5% 7.0% 128.3 141,0
In front of Soldier Beam 17 Backfill of El 298 299.0 13.1% 13.0% 109.9 119.0
Hal trench
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 294.0 6,6% 7.0% 126.5 141.0
5S&65
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 294.0 6.1% 7,0% 129.7 141.0
Relative Comp.
Obt.
94%
91%
94%
92%
90%
93%
90%
88%
91%
91%
92%
91%
92%
90%
92%
Req.
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Non-Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
53&8
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name
Location:
T®st Sample*ff
169 4R/C
170 4 R/C
171 4 R/C
172 15
173 15
174 4 R/C
175 4 R/C
176 4 R/C
177 4 R/C
178 4 R/C
179 4 R/C
180 4 R/C
181 4 R/C
182 4 R/C
183 4 R/C
Test
Date
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/9/2006
6/12/2006
6/12/2006
6/12/2006
6/12/2006
6/12/2006
6/12/2006
6/13/2006
6/13/2006
6/13/2006
6/13/2006
39583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Moisture Dry
Field Opt. Fie
Density (pcf) Relative Comp. Conform
Id Max. Obt. Req. Non-Conform
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 294.0 5,8% 7.0% 126.9 141,0 90% 90% Conform
53&12
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 295.0 6.7% 7,0% 128.3 141.0 91% 90% Conform
54&18
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 294.0 6.8% 7.0% 131.1 141-0 93% 90% Conform
53&20
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 294,0 18.7% 13.0% 109.9 119.0 92% 90% Conform
58&18
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 294.0 20.4% 13.0% 105,2 119.0 88% 90% Nonconform
57&8
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 295.0 5.9% 7.0% 125.5 141.0 89% 90% Nonconform
53&7
Retestof#174 295.0 7.2% 7.0% 129,7 141,0 92% 90% Conform
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 295.0 5.2% 7.0% 124.1 141.0 88% 90% Nonconform
53&15
Retestof#176 295.0 7.1% 7,0% 128.3 141.0 91% 90% Conform
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 297.0 8.7% 7,0% 128.6 141.0 91% 90% Conform
53&9
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 298.0 6.0% 7.0% 119.8 141.0 85% 90% Nonconform
53&5
Retestof#179 298.0 7.1% 7.0% 133.9 141.0 95% 90% Conform
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 298,0 6.1% 7.0% 125.5 141.0 89% 90% Nonconform
54&14
Retestof#181 298.0 7.1% 7.0% 131,1 141,0 93% 90% Conform
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 297.5 5.9% 7.0% 122.7 141.0 87% 90% Nonconform
54&14
184 4 R/C 6/13/2006 Retestof#183 297.5 6.8% 70% 135.4 141.0 96%90%Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number;
Project Name:
Location:
Test
n
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
Sample #
6
15
15
4 R/C
4 R/C
4 R/C
6
17
17
17
4 R/C
4 R/C
17
17
Test
Date
6/13/2006
6/13/2006
6/13/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/15/2006
6/15/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
M
Tr~t 1 nritlrttt Plnr ffMteal LUtallOM Clt?V. \tlf — — — —
Fiek
oisture Dry Density (pcf)
1 Opt Field Max.
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 297,0 6.2% 7.0% 125.1 135.0
5S&27
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 298.0 20.0% 13.0% 107.5 119.0
66&17
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 298.0. 17.2% 13.0% 107.5 119,0
66&21
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 299.0 6.3% 7.0% 133.3 141.0
53&6
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 299,0 8.2% 7.0% 134.9 141.0
53&17
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 299.0 7.4
53&22
% 7.0% 135,4 141.0
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 2960 6.4% 7,0% 1274 135.0
52S24 (e slope)
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 298.0 17.4% 13.5% 103.4 116.5
S9&64
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 298.0 15.7% 13.5% 103.4 116.5
9&66
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 298,0 16.1% 13,5% 106.9 116,5
12&66
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 301.0 8.7% 7.0% 129.5 141.0
54&6
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 301,0 7.5% 7.0% 134.9 141.0
53&15
Aligned at L point between soldier beams 300.0 17.7% 13.5% 102,2 116.5
59S63
Retestof#197 300.0 17,1% 13.5% 109.3 116,5
Relative Comp.
Obt.
93%
90%
90%
95%
96%
96%
94%
89%
89%
92%
92%
96%
88%
94%
Req.
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Non-Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform OK'd by VO
Nonconform OK'd by VO
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number
Project Name
Location:
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Test
#Sampled
Test
Date
Test Location Elev. (ft)
Moisture
Field Opt
Dry Density (pcf)
Field Max.
Relative Comp.
Obt.Req.
Conform
Non-Conform
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
17
17
17
17
17
17
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
4R/C
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
6/15/2006
6/15/2006
6/15/2006
6/15/2006
6/15/2006
6/16/2006
6/15/2006
6/15/2006
6/15/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
5/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
66&14
Retestof#199
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
57&66
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
S7&67
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
66S24
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
57&8
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
S6&23
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
57&16
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
57&8
Retestof#205
Retestof#206
15'WestofSB#10
Retestof#210
10' West of SB #17
Retestof#212
15'WestofSB#21
20'WestofSB#9
20'WestofSB#13
20'WestofSB#18
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
302.0
302.0
302.0
302.0
302.0
303.5
303.5
303.5
303.5
303.5
306.0
306.0
306.0
18.6%
19.1%
16.5%
16.7%
16.3%
6.4%
7.4%
7.6%
6.8%
7.8%
7.4%
177%
16.4%
16.1%
16.7%
15.7%
16.0%
16.7%
16.1%
13.5%
13.5%
13.5%
13.5%
13.5%
13.5%
7.0%
7,0%
7.0%
7,0%
7.0%
13.5%
13.5%
13.5%
13.5%
13.5%
13,5%
13.5%
13,5%
98.7
106.9
108.1
110.5
111.2
132.2
124.1
124.1
126.9
131.1
132,5
103,4
106,9
1034
106.9
108.1
106.9
108.1
108.1
116.5
116.5
116.5
116,5
116.5
116.5
141.0
141.0
141.0
141.0
141.0
116,5
116.0
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
85%
92%
93%
95%
95%
113%
88%
88%
90%
93%
94%
89%
92%
89%
92%
93%
92%
93%
93%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number
Project Name:
Location:
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Test
#Sample #
Test
Date
Test Location Elev, (ft)
Moisture
Field
218 17 6/16/2006 20' West of SB#25 306.0 15.8%
219 4 R/C 6/19/2006 Aligned at L point between soldier beams 305.5 6-1%
57&5
Opt.
Dry Density (pcf)
Field
13.5% 105.7
7,0% 126,9
Max.
Relative Com p.
Obt.
116,5 91%
141.0 90%
Req.
Conform
Non-Conform
90% Conform
90% Conform
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
4 R/C
4 R/C
4 R/C
6
6
15
15
15
17
17
15
17
17
15
17
17
4 R/C
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/20/2006
6/20/2006
6/20/2006
6/20/2006
6/19/2006 Aligned at L point between soldier beams
57&11
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
56&19
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
58824
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
57&17
Aligned at L point between soldier beams
57S65
20' West of Soldier Beam #7
20' West of Soldier Beam #11
20' West of Soldier Beam #24
20' West of Soldier Beam #15
Retestof#228
20' West of Soldier Beam #13
20' West of Soldier Beam #17
20' West of Soldier Beam #21
20' West of Soldier Beam #22
20' West of Soldier Beam #9
Retestof#234
Alignment of 'L' Point between soldier
beams 16&56
305
305
307
307
306
.5
.5
.0
.0
,5
306,5
307
307
307
307
308
308
307
308
,0
.0
,0
,0
,0
.0
.5
0
308,0
308
310
.0
0
7.0%
7.3%
6.9%
7,5%
7.3%
16.2%
15.9%
16.2%
20.2%
19.1%
17,0%
16.2%
19.7%
17.6%
20.5%
14.3%
6.4%
7.0%
7.0%
7,0%
7.0%
7.0%
13.0%
13.0%
13.0%
13.5%
13,5%
13.0%
13.5%
13.5%
13.0%
13.5%
13.5%
7.0%
128.3
129.7
131
127
129
109
111
108
103
1
.8
.2
.9
.1
.7
.4
105-7
109
106
104
110
104
109
128
.9
,9
.6
.6
.7
.5
.3
141
141
141
135
135
119
119
119
116
116
119
116
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
,5
.5
.0
.5
116.5
119.0
116.5
116.
141
.5
0
91%
92%
93%
•95%
96%
92%
93%
91%
89%
91%
92%
92%
90%
93%
90%
94%
91%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number
Project Name
Location:
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad. California
Test
it Sample #
Test
Date
Test Location Elev, (ft)
Moisture
Field Opt,
Dry Density (pcf)
Field Max,
Relative Com p.
Obt.Req.
Conform
Non-Conform
237 16R/C 6/20/2006
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
17
15
17
4R/C
17
15
15
6
6
4R/C
4R/C
16
15
15
19
16
4R/C
15
15
15
15
19
19
19
6/21/2006
6/21/2006
6/21/2006
6/21/2006
6/22/2006
6/22/2006
S/22/2006
6/22/2006
6/22/2006
6/22/2006
6/23/2006
6/23/2006
6/23/2006
6/23/2006
6/26/2006
6/26/2006
6/26/2006
6/27/2006
6/27/2006
6/27/2006
6/27/2006
6/27/2006
6/27/2006
6/27/2006
Alignment of 'L' Point between soldier
beams 7S58
20' West of Soldier Beam #25
20' West of Soldier Beam #5
10'West of SB #59
20'West of SB #65
25'West of SB-11
25'WestofSB-16
2Q'WestofSB-23
Aligned of L point between SB 24&S7
Aligned of L point between SB 7&57
Aligned of L point between SB 19&56
Aligned of L point between SB 58&21
Aligned of L point between SB 58&9
20'West of SB #12
20'West of SB #25
50'West of SB #29
70'West of SB #14
50' West of SB #2
22' West of SB #4
16'West of SB #5
15'West of SB #20
18'West of SB #23
65' West of SB #23
62' West of SB #7
68' West of SB #2
310.0 6.4% 6.0% 125.0 133.0 94%90%Conform
311.5
307.0
311.0
311.0
313.0
313,0
313.0
314.0
314.0
314.0
316.0
316.0
316.0
316.0
318.0
318.0
318.0
320.0
320.0
320.0
320.0
320.0
320,0
322.0
20.7%
19.7%
19.0%
7.5%
18.1%
17.9%
18.0%
7.1%
7.9%
7.5%
9.5%
7.9%
20.0%
19.0%
9.5%
9.5%
8.3%
17.5%
14.5%
14.5%
16.3%
7.9%
7.1%
8.6%
13.5%
13.0%
13.5%
7.0%
13.5%
13.0%
13.0%
7.0%
70%
7,0%
7.0%
6.0%
13.0%
13.0%
11.0%
6,5%
7,0%
13.0%
13.0%
13.0%
13.0%
11.0%
11.0%
1 1 ,0%
108,1
112.3
106.6
131.9
107.3
109.9
112.3
129.1
124.6
132,4
131,3
128.4
113.4
114.6
113.4
126.8
134.9
107,5
113.5
111.7
112.3
112.9
115.1
116.6
116.5
119.0
116.5
141.0
116.5
119.0
119.0
135.0
135.0
141.0
141.0
133,0
119.0
119.0
126.0
133.0
141.0
119.0
119.0
119.0
119.0
126.0
126.0
126.0
93%
94%
92%
94%
92%
92%
94%
96%
92%
94%
93%
97%
95%
96%
90%
95%
96%
90%
95%
94%
94%
90%
91%
93%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
Sample #
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
15
15
19
19
19
19
15
15
19
19
19
19
15
15
19
19
19
Test
Date
6/27/2006
6/28/2006
6/28/2006
6/28/2006
6/29/2006
6/29/2006
6/29/2006
6/29/2006
6/29/2006
6/30/2006
6/30/2006
6/30/2006
6/30/2006
6/30/2006
7/5/2006
7/5/2006
7/5/2006
7/6/2006
7/6/2006
7/6/2006
7/6/2006
7/6/2006
7/6/2006
7/6/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Moisture Dry
Field Opt, Fie
Density (pcf) Relative Comp. Conform
Id Max. Obt. Req. Non-Conform
60' West of SB #27 322.0 7.1% 11.0% 115.8 126.0 92% 90% Conform
60' West of SB #29 323.0 13.6% 11.0% 109,2 126.0 87% 90% Nonconform
70' West of SB #20 323.0 7.9% 11.0% 114.2 126.0 91% 90% Conform
Retestof#263 323,0 9,4% 11.0% 114,2 126,0 91% 90% Conform
60' West of SB #26 325.0 9,5% 11.0% 115.5 126.0 92% 90% Conform
601 West of SB #16 325.0 11.9% 11.0% 116.7 126.0 93% 90% Conform
60'WestofSB#4 325.0 10.3% 11.0% 115.5 126.0 92% 90% Conform
15' West of SB #28 325.0 14.5% 13.0% 108.2 119.0 91% 90% Conform
15' West of SB #4 325.0 15.4% 13.0% 110.7 119.0 93% 90% Conform
65' West of SB #30 327.0 10.5% 11.0% 116.5 126.0 92% 90% Conform
65' West of SB #6 327.0 12.0% 11.0% 115.5 126.0 92% 90% Conform
60' West of SB #9 327,5 9.2% 11.0% 115.5 126.0 92% 90% Conform
60' West of SB #30 327.5 11.3% 11.0% 117,9 126.0 94% 90% Conform
15* West of SB #30 327.0 15,3% 13,0% 109.9 119.0 92% 90% Conform
15'WestofSB#1 327.5 18.3% 13,0% 107.0 119.0 90% 90% Conform
60' West of SB #23 329.0 10.3% 11.0% 114.2 126.0 91% 90% Conform
60' West of SB #7 329.0 11.1% 11.0% 115.4 126.0 92% 90% Conform
40' West and 5' South of SB #8 329.5 9.5% 110% 116,7 126.0 93% 90% Conform
55' West of Soldier Beam #4 329.5 9.5% 11.0% 116.2 126.0 92% 90% Conform
35' West of Soldier Beam #16 331.0 14.5% 13,0% 113.0 119.0 95% 90% Conform
30' West of Soldier Beam #24 331.0 15.4% 13.0% 112.7 119.0 95% 90% Conform
35' North and 5' East of Soldier Beam #60 331.0 10.3% 11.0% 117.9 126,0 94% 90% Conform
45' West of Soldier Beam #15 331.0 11.1% 11.0% 120.5 126.0 96% 90% Conform
40' West and 10' South of Soldier Beam #30 331,0 10.3% 11.0% 117.9 126.0 94% 90% Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
Sam pie #
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
15
15
15
15
Test
Date
7/7/2006
7/7/2006
7/7/2006
7/7/2006
7/10/2006
7/10/2006
7/12/2006
7/12/2006
7/12/2006
7/12/2006
7/18/2006
7/18/2006
7/19/2006
7/19/2006
7/19/2006
7/19/2006
8/2/2006
8/2/2006
8/2/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Oulce
Carlsbad, California
Moisture
Field Opt,
Dry Density (pcf) Relative Comp.
Field Max. Obt. Req.
40' West of Soldier Beam #4 333.0 7,9% 11.0% 112,9 126.0 90% 90%
40' West of Soldier Beam #12 333.0 11.9% 110% 108.0 126.0 86% 90%
40' West of Soldier Beam #27 333.0 12.7% 11.0% 114.4 126.0 91% 90%
Retestof#287 333.0 11.9% 11.0% 115.5 126.0 92% 90%
29' Norths 32' East of Soldier Beam #60 330.0 8,7% 11.0% 109.1 126.0 87% 90%
Retestof#290 330,0 9.4% 11.0% 116.7 126.0 93% 90%
29' North & 24' East of Soldier Beam #60 330.0 15.4% 11.0% 117.8 126.0 93% 90%
29' North & 27' East of Soldier Beam #60 330-0 13.6% 11.0% 115.1 126.0 91% 90%
29' North& 13' East of Soldier Beam #60 332.0 10.3% 11.0% 109.9 126.0 87% 90%
Retestof#294 332.0 10.8% 11,0% 114.2 126.0 91% 90%
30' West of Soldier Beam #8 329.0 9.4% 11.0% 114.2 126.0 91% 90%
24' West of Soldier Beam #1 328.5 8.8% 11.0% 115.5 126.0 92% 90%
35' West of Soldier Beam #17 329.0 9.0% 11.0% 118.3 126.0 94% 90%
35' West of Soldier Beam #20 330.0 7.1% 11.0% 113,0 126.0 90% 90%
49' Norths 42' West of Soldier Beam #1 330.0 6.8% 11.0% 116.7 126.0 93% 90%
10' West of Soldier Beam #10 330.0 14.0% 13.0% 114.5 119.0 96% 90%
200' South and 25' West of North End 331,5 14,2% 13,0% 102.8 119.0 86% 90%
Sound Wall
Retes!of#302 331.5 15.6% 13.0% 109.9 119,0 92% 90%
300' South and 5' West of North End Sound 333.0 14.7% 13,0% 112.3 119.0 94% 90%
Wall
Conform
Non-Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
305 15 8/2/2006 250' South and 14' West of North End
Sound Wall
306 19 8/3/2006 280' South and 10' West of North End
Sound Wall
335.0 15.2% 13.0% 111.1 119.0 93% 90% Conform
335.0 13.2% 11,0% 116.7 126.0 93% 90% Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number;
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
Sample #
15
15
15
19
19
19
4R/C
4R/C
13
4R/C
10
22
23
23
23
Test
Date
8/3/2006
8/3/2006
8/8/2006
8/8/2006
8/10/2006
8/10/2006
9/11/2006
9/11/2006
9/11/2006
9/12/2006
9/12/2006
11/27/2006
12/6/2006
12/6/2006
12/6/2006
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad, California
Mi
Tost Loc3tion Eisv. (ft) ---
Fielc
Disture Dry Density (pcf)
i Opt. Field Max.
200' South and 24' West of North End 334,0 11-9% 13.0% 109.9 119.0
Sound Wall
250' South and 14' West of North End 336.0 12.1% 13.0% 111.1 119.0
Sound Wall
225' South and 25' West of North End 335.0 13.4% 13.0% 108.7 119.0
Sound Wall
8' West and 40' North of Connection Point of 336,0 10,7% 11.0% 117.9 126.0
Sound Wall
8' West of Connection Point of Sound Wall 337.0 9.5% 11.0% 119.6 126.0
8' West and 1 0' North of Connection Point of 337,0 8.3% 11.0% 115.5 126.0
Sound Wall
Exterior Side Privacy Wall 20' North& 10' 338.0 7,0% 7.0% 125.5 141.0
East of Sound Wall Opening
Retestof#313 338.0 7,2% 7.0% 128.3 141.0
Adjacent opening of sound wall • 338.5 6.7% 6.0% 134.7 143.0
10' North of Sound Wall Opening 338.5 9.4% 7.0% 134.9 141.0
40' North East of Sound Wall Opening 3375 9.0% 70% 123.2 136.0
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 333.5 6.5% 6.0% 136.8 144.0
Sta 12+50
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 334.1 5.3% 5.0% 136.8 142.5
Sta 12+50
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 332.0 5.70/
Sta 10+75
o 5.0% 135.4 142.5
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 336,0 6.0% 5.0% 136.8 142.5
Relative Com p.
Obt.
92%
93%
91%
94%
95%
92%
89%
91%
94%
96%
91%
95%
96%
95%
96%
Req.
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
95%
95%
95%
95%
Conform
Non-Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Sta 13+25
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
Sample #
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
25
25
25
25
Test
Date
12/7/2006
12/7/2006
12/7/2006
12/7/2006
12/7/2006
12/7/2006
12/7/2006
12/7/2006
12/7/2006
12/7/2006
1/8/2007
1/9/2007
1/9/2007
1/9/2007
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Oulce
Carlsbad. California
M
Tft~f 1 nfifinn Flr-tr /fHItsai I_>Ut#<IUUi 1 CiltJV, \It/
Fiek
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 331 7
Sta 10+10
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 332,3
Sta 10+50
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 332.7
Sta 1H-00
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 333.2
Sta 11 +50
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 333.8
Sta 12+00
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 334 4
Sta 12+50
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 335.3
Sta 13+00
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 336.5
Sta 13+50
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 336.6
Sta 13+90
Pedestrian/Bike Path & Utility Access Road 336.6
Sta 13+95
oisture Dry Density (pcf)
1 Opt. Field Max.
144.0 151.6
144.4 151.6
148.6 151.6
147.0 151.6
148.5 151.6
147.2 151.6
148.5 151.6
148.6 151.6
145.5 151,6
144.0 151.6
Agua Dulce Court at Turning Radious Sta SG 4.1% 8.5% 123.5 130,5
15+10
Entrance to Agua Dulce Court Sta 12+25 SG 7.1% 8.5% 113.5 130.5
Retestof333 SG 7.5% 8.5% 125.3 130.5
Agua Dulce Court at Sta 13+95 SG 7.0% 8.5% 124.0 130.5
Relative Com p.
Obt.
95%
95%
98%
97%
98%
97%
98%
98%
96%
95%
95%
87%
96%
95%
Req.
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
Conform
Non-Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Location
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad. California
Test
#Sample #
Test
Date
Test Location Elev. (ft)
Moisture
Field Opt,
Dry Density (pcf)
Field Max.
Relative Comp.
Obt.Req.
Conform
Non-Conform
336 25 1/10/2007
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
25
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
23
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/10/2007
1/12/2007
1/12/2007
1/12/2007
1/15/2007
Agua Dulce Court Center of Turning Radius
Approx Sta 14+80
Agua Dulce Ct at Sta 12+83
Center of Agua Dulce Ct at Sta 13+00
Agua Dulce Ct at Sta 13+50
Dorado Place at Sta 11 +72
Dorado Place at Sta 11+00
Agua Dulce Ct Sta 12+19
Agua Dulce Ct Sta 12+73
Agua Dulce Ct Sta 13+21
Agua Dulce Ct Sta 13+38
Agua Dulce Ct Sta 13+85
Agua Dulce Ct Sta 13+53
Agua Dulce Ct Sta 14+50
Agua Dulce Ct 12+19
Agua DulceCt 12+73
Agua DulceCt 13+21
Agua DulceCt 13+38
Agua DulceCt 13+85
Agua Dulce Ct 13+53
Agua DulceCt 14+50
Retest of 353
Retest of 354
Permanent Trench Patch Estera St Sta
10+00
SG 6.8% 8.5% 126.6 130.5 97%95%Conform
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
SG
6.9% 8.5% 125,3
7.1% 8.5% 126.6
6.9% 8,5 126.6
7.3% 8.5 125.3
7.5% 8.5 125.3
144,0
145.2
142.6
143.8
142.3
139.3
145.3
143.5
142.4
142.0
143,8
139.0
140.0
143.7
144.0
142.5
6.3% 5.0% 136,8
130.5
130.5
130.5
130.5
130,5
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149.8
149,8
149.8
149.8
142,5
96%
97%
97%
96%
96%
96%
97%
95%
96%
95%
93%
97%
96%
95%
95%
96%
93%
94%
96%
96%
95%
96%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Nonconform
Nonconform
Conform
Conform
Conform
Conform
ok per DM
ok per DM
ok per DM
TABLE 2
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Location:
Test
#
359
360
361
362
Te
Sample #
Ot.
89583
Carlsbad - Agua Dulce
Carlsbad. California
st Moisture Dry
te Field Opt, Fie
Density (pcf) Relative Comp. Conform
Id Max. Obt. Req. Non-Conform
23 1/15/2007 Permanent Trench Patch Estera St. Sta SG 6,2% 5,0% 135,4 142,5 95% 95% Conform
9+85
AC 1/15/2007 Permanent Trench Patch Estera St. Sta 8"AC 145.9 151.6 96% 95% Conform
10+17
AC 1/15/2007 Permanent Trench Patch Estera St. Sta 8"AC 147.1 151.6 97% 95% Conform
9+97
AC 1/15/2007 Permanent Trench Patch Estera St. Sta 8"AC 145.2 151.6 96% 95% Conform
10+25
April 30, 2008
Contract No.; 148526
City of Carlsbad
5950 HI C'ainino Real
Carlsbad. CA 92009
Attention: Mr. Skip Hammann
Subject: Geotechnical I engineering Disclosure
Project: Rancho Santa Fe Road-Phase I
Roadway Slope Stabilization
Carlsbad. California
References: 1. "Geotechnical Investigation & Field Review Report. Rancho Santa Fe Road Phase 7, Volume 1 &
2. Roadway Slope Stabilization, Carlsbad. California."Contract No.: 39583, prepared by Testing
Engineers-US Labs, dated April 17. 2006.
2, "As Graded Compaction Report. Rancho Santa Fe Road Slide Slope Stabilization, Carlsbad
California," Contract No: 89583. prepared by Testing Engineers - US Labs, dated February 19, 2007.
Dear Mr. Hammann:
Testing Engineers -San Diego, Inc. (TESD) was the engineer of record for the recently completed
Rancho Santa Fe Road Phase 1 Roadway Slope Stabilization and has issued its As-Grade
Compaction Report for said work of improvement finding that the slope stabilization earthwork
and subdrainage installation were constructed in general conformance with the project
specifications and are considered suitable for the intended use It is TESD's opinion that the
stability of the repaired slope meets or exceeds the minimum factors of safety required for
stability, i.e. the slope is permanently stable, and that the residences at the base of the slope
including those at 7550 Agua Dulce Court and 7551 Agua Dulce Court, Carlsbad, California, are
not at risk from slope instability.
It should be noted that all slopes (natural, cut, fill or otherwise) are subject to downhill "creep" to
some degree, as well as possible surficial deterioration due to normal weathering. This general
observation is made in order to emphasize the importance of slope maintenance, and is not
intended to suggest a particularly unusual or compelling adverse condition. Slope vegetation
should be maintained to reduce erosion and paved slope drains should be periodically cleared of
any significant runoff sediments, debris, vegetation, overgrowth, etc. in order to maintain proper
performance.
TESD appreciates being of service to you. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (858)715-5800.
Respectfully submitted,
Testing Engineers - San Di
a Bureau. Verrtas Company
Van Olin, GE 2578
Principal Geotechnical Engi
Diitr button
Fjtginccrs S;in Diego
.
• .,, , ...... I
:
Mllll: (858) '<•' •.:•""
!.!•,: (S5RJ '! ;- ;<K!0 '
'•. '.. !..'-..''. I ; - p
EXHIBIT 2