HomeMy WebLinkAboutJHK & Associates; 1995-09-21;I) 0
September 21, 1995
TO: DEPUTY CITY CLERK
FROM: Management Analyst, Engineering
VIA: k''eity Engineer ,cv*
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH JHK AND ASSOCIATES INC.
Three sets of our proposed agreement with JHK and Associates, Inc. are enclosed and ready
for signature by the City Clerk, City Attorney, and City Manager.
Thank you for your assistance.
-, yz&gp d4?5&?,&
MINDY JACOBS
Management Analyst
Attachment
c: Senior Management Analyst, Engineering
%/JA
/a&: cx5Xp%zJ&~ -4 L!+.Il* -*
YL
L
5 e 0 b
\
\
AGREEMENT FOR
TRAFFl C ENG I N EERl NG SERVl CES
FOR PREPARATION OF A
SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the % day of 4- , 1995,
by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"City", and JHK AND ASSOCIATES, INC. I hereinafter referred to as "Contractor."
RECITALS
City requires the services of an engineering Contractor to provide the necessary traffic
engineering services for preparation of a Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis; and Contractor
possesses the necessary skills and qualifications to provide the services required by the City;
NOW, THEREFOREI in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants contained
herein, City and Contractor agree as follows:
1. CONTRACTOR'S OBLl G All 0 N S
Contractor shall prepare and complete a Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis for the
Shelley Tract Map, CT 90-03, in accordance with the provisions of its proposal to the City of
Carlsbad, dated September 8, 1995, and attached hereto as Exhibit "A.
2. CITY OBLIGATIONS
The City shall provide all relevant data at its disposal relative to the analysis, and assist
in coordination and obtaining additional data from other agencies to allow the expeditious
completion of the scope of services outlined in Exhibit "A".
rev.7/14/95
I
3 a 0 <
\
3. PROGRESS AND COMPLETlON
The work under this contract will begin within ten (10) days after receipt of notification to
proceed by the City and be completed within one hundred (100) days of that date. Extensions
of time may be granted if requested by the contractor and agreed to in writing by the City
Engineer. The City Engineer will give allowance for documented and substantiated
unforeseeable and unavoidable delays not caused by a lack of foresight on the part of the
Contractor, or delays caused by City inaction or other agencies' lack of timely action.
4. FEES TO BE PAID TO CONTRACTOR
The total fee payable for the services to be performed shall be $14,150. No other
compensation for services will be allowed except those items covered by supplemental
agreements per Paragraph 8, "Changes in Work." The City reserves the right to withhold a ten
percent (10%) retention until the project has been accepted by the City.
5. DURATION OF CONTRACT
This agreement shall extend for a period of one year from date thereof. The contract may
be extended by the City Manager for one additional one (1) year periods or parts thereof, based
upon a review of satisfactory performance and the City's needs. The parties shall prepare
extensions in writing indicating effective date and length of the extended contract.
6. PAYhlENT OF FEES
Payment of approved items on the invoice shall be mailed to the Contractor prior to the
30th day of the month the invoice was submitted.
a. FINAL SUBMISSIONS
Within fourteen (14) days of completion and approval of the draft Supplemental Traffic
Impact Analysis, the Contractor shall deliver to the City the following items:
rev.7/14/95
2
-+
< a 0
\
4.
2.
3.
Ten (1 0) copies of the final report of the Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis,
One (1 1 camera-ready final report copy, single-sided, for reproduction purposes.
One (1) computer disk containing the final report, compatible with Wordperfect
Version 5.1 or higher.
El. CHANGES IN WORK
If, in the course of the contract, changes seem merited by the Contractor or the City, and
informal consultations with the other patty indicate that a change in the conditions of the contract
is warranted, the Contractor or the City may request a change in contract. Such changes shall
be processed by the City in the following manner: A letter outlining the required changes shall
be forwarded to the City by Contractor to inform them of the proposed changes along with a
statement of estimated changes in charges or time schedule. A Standard Amendment to
Agreement shall be prepared by the City and approved by the City according to the procedures
described in Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.28.1 72. Such Amendment to Agreement shall
not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of the agreement.
9. COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
The Contractor warrants that their firm has not employed or retained any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Contractor, to solicit or secure this
agreement, and that Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other
than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other
consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making of this agreement. For
breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this agreement without
liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or consideration, or otherwise
recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fees, gift, or contingenl
fee.
rev.71f 4/95
3
,
1 e 0
\
10. NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE
The Contractor shall comply with the state and federal laws regarding nondiscrimination.
11 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
In the event of the Contractor’s failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the work as
provided for in this contract, the City may terminate this contract for nonperformance by notifying
the Contractor by certified mail of the termination of the contractor. The Contractor, thereupon,
has five (5) working days to deliver said documents owned by the City and all work in progress
to the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall make a determination of fact based upon the
documents delivered to City of the percentage of work which the Contractor has performed which
is usable and of worth to the City in having the contract completed. Based upon that finding as
reported to the City Manager, the Manager shall determine the final payment of the contract.
This agreement may be terminated by either party upon tendering thirty (30) days written
notice to the other party. In the event of such suspension or termination, upon request of the
City, the Contractor shall assemble the work product and put same in order for proper filing and
closing and deliver said product to City. In the event of termination, the Contractor shall be paid
for work performed to the termination date; however, the total shall not exceed the lump sum fee
payable under paragraph 4. The City shall make the final determination as to the portions of
tasks completed and the compensation to be made.
12. DISPUTES
If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of work under this agreement, the
following procedure shall be used to resolve any question of fact or interpretation not otherwise
settled by agreement between parties. Such questions, if they become identified as a part of
a dispute among persons operating under the provisions of this contract, shall be reduced to
writing by the principal of the Contractor or the City Engineer. A copy of such documented
rev.7/14/95
4
.
\ e 0
\
dispute shall be forwarded to both parties involved along with recommended methods of
resolution which would be of benefit to both parties. The City Engineer or principal receiving the
letter shall reply to the letter along with a recommended method of resolution within ten (10)
days. if the resolution thus obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved party, a letter outlining the
dispute shall be forwarded to the City Council for their resolution through the Office of the City
Manager. The City Council may then opt to consider the directed solution to the problem. In
such cases, the action of the City Council shall be binding upon the parties involved, although
nothing in this procedure shall prohibit the parties seeking remedies available to them at law.
13. CLAIMS AND LAWSUITS
The Contractor shall agree that any contract claim submitted to the City must be asserted
as part of the contract process as set forth in this agreement and not in anticipation of litigation
or in conjunction with litigation. The Contractor acknowledges that if a false claim is submitted
to the City, it may be considered fraud and the Contractor may be subject to criminal
prosecution. The Contractor acknowledges that California Government Code sections 12650 &
seq., the False Claims Act, provides for civil penalties where a person knowingly submits a false
claim to a public entity. These provisions include false claims made with deliberate ignorance of
the false information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of information. If the City of
Carlsbad seeks to recover penalties pursuant to the False Claims Act, it is entitled to recover its
litigation costs, including attorney’s fees. The Contractor shall acknowledge that the filing of 8
false claim may subject the Contractor to an administrative debarment proceeding wherein the
Contractor may be prevented to act as a Contractor on any public work or improvement for a
period of up to five years. L Initial
rev.7/14/95
5
\ e e
L
The provisions of Carlsbad Municipal Code sections 3.32.025, 3.32.026, 3.32.027 and
& 3.32.028 pertaining to false claims are incorporated herein by reference.
Initial
14. STATUS OF THE CONTRACTOR
The Contractor shall perform the services provided for herein in Contractor’s own way as
an independent contractor and in pursuit of Contractor‘s independent calling, and not as an
employee of the City. Contractor shall be under control of the City only as to the result to be
accomplished, but shall consult with the City as provided for in the request for proposal. The
persons used by the Contractor to provide services under this agreement shall not be considered
employees of the City for any purposes whatsoever.
The Contractor is an independent contractor of the City. The payment made to the
Contractor pursuant to the contract shall be the full and complete compensation to which the
Contractor is entitled. The City shall not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of
the Contractor or his/her employees or subcontractors. The City shall not be required to pay any
workers’ compensation insurance or unemployment contributions on behalf of the Contractor or
his/her employees or subcontractors. The Contractor agrees to indemnify the City within 30 days
for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtime payment, unemployment payment
or workers’ compensation payment which the City may be required to make on behalf of the
Contractor or any employee or subcontractor of the Contractor for work done under this
agreement or such indemnification amount may be deducted by the City from any balance owing
to the Contractor.
rev.7/14/95
6
8
, 0
\ e
\
The Contractor shall be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control
Act of 1986 and shall comply with those requirements, including, but not limited to, verifying the
eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and Consultants that are
included in this agreement.
15. CONFORMITY TO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall cause all drawings and specifications to conform to all applicable
requirements of law: federal, state and local. Contractor shall provide all necessary supporting
documents, to be filed with any agencies whose approval is necessary.
The City will provide copies of the approved plans to any other agencies.
16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All plans, studies, sketches, drawings, reports, and specifications as herein required are
the property of the City, whether the work for which they are made be executed or not. In the
event this contract is terminated, all documents, plans, specifications, drawings, reports, and
studies shall be delivered forthwith to the City. Contractor shall have the right to make one (1)
copy of the plans for his/her records.
17. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS
The Contractor agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant
to this contract shall be vested in City and hereby agrees to relinquish all claims to such
copyrights in favor of City.
48. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT
The City, its elected and appointed officers and employees shall not be liable for any
claims, liabilities, penalties, fines, or any damage to goods, properties, or effects of any person
whatever; nor for personal injuries or death caused by, or resulting from, or any intentional or
rev.?/ 14/95
a
, 0 0
\
negligent acts, errors or omissions of Contractor or Contractor’s agents, employees, or
representatives.
Furthermore, Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold free and harmless
the City and its elected and appointed officers and empioyees against any claims for damages,
liabilities, penalties or fines, costs or expenses, including liabilities or claims by reason of alleged
defects in any plans and specifications arising out of the conduct of the Contractor or any agent
or employee, subcontractors, or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by
this agreement, except only for those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful
conduct of the City, or its elected and appointed officers and employees.
Furthermore, Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold free and harmless
the City and its elected and appointed officers and employees against any claims for damages,
liabilities, penalties or fines, costs or expenses, including liabilities or claims by reason of alleged
defects in any plans and specifications arising out of or connected with the negligent conduct
of the Contractor or any agent or employee, subcontractors, or others in connection with the
execution of the work covered by this agreement.
Contractor’s indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys fees and
liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in defending against such claims,
whether the same proceed to judgment or not.
Consultant shall at its own expense, upon written request by the City, defend any such
suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents or employees. Contractor’s
indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the
Contractor.
rev.7/14/95
8
\ a m
19. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT
The Contractor shall not assign this contract or any part thereof or any monies due
thereunder without the prior written consent of the City.
20. SUBCONTRACTING
If the Contractor shall subcontract any of the work to be performed under this contract
by the Contractor, Contractor shall be fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of
Contractor’s subcontractor and of the persons either directly or indirectly employed by the
subcontractor, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by
Contractor. Nothing contained in this contract shall create any contractual relationship between
any subcontractor of Contractor and the City. The Contractor shall bind every subcontractor and
every subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this contract applicable to Contractor’s
work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the subcontract in question approved in writing
by the City.
21. PROHIBITED INTEREST
No official of the City who is authorized in such capacity on behalf of the City to negotiate,
make, accept, or approve, or take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving of this
agreement, shall become directly or indirectly interested personally in this contract or in any part
thereof. No officer or employee of the City who is authorized in such capacity and on behalf of
the City to exercise any executive, supervisory, or similar functions in connection with the
performance of this contract shall become directly or indirectly interested personally in this
contract or any part thereof.
~ev.7/14/95
9
0 0
22. VERBAL AGREEMENT OR CONVERSATION
No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, agent, or employee of the City,
either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms
or obligations herein contained nor entitle the Contractor to any additional payment whatsoever
under the terms of this contract.
23. SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS
Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 18, "Hold Harmless Agreement," all terms,
conditions, and provisions hereof shall inure to and shall bind each of the parties hereto, and
each of their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.
24. EFFECTIVE DATE
This agreement shall be effective on and from the day and year first written above.
25. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Contractor shall file a conflict of interest statement with the City Clerk in accordance
with the requirements of the City's conflict of interest code. The disclosure category shall be
categories A, B, C-1 and C2 (Investment and Real Property), D, E, F, H-1 and H-3 (Personal
Income), H-2 (Business Entity Income), and G (Business Position).
26. INSURANCE
The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of the contract and any and all
amendments insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may
arise out of or in connection with performance of the work hereunder by the contractor, his
agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Said insurance shall be obtained from
an insurance carrier admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California. The
insurance carrier is required to have a current Best's Key Rating of not less than "A-:V" and shall
meet the City's policy for insurance as stated in Resolution No. 91-403.
I
rev.7/14/95
10
e 0
A. Coveraqes and Limits.
Contractor shall maintain the types of coverages and minimum limits indicated
herein, unless a lower amount is approved by the City Attorney or City Manager:
1. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance. $1,000,000 combined single-
limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If the submitted
policies contain aggregate limits, general aggregate limits shall apply separately to the work
under this contract or the general aggregate shall be twice the required per occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability (i the use of an automobile is involved for contractor’s
work for the City). $1,000,000 combined single-limit per accident for bodily injury and property
damage.
3. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability. Workers’ Compensation
limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer’s Liability limits of
$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury.
4. Professional Liability. Errors and omissions liability appropriate to the
contractor’s profession, with a discovery period of not less than 12 months after completion of
work or termination of contract. $1,000,000 per occurrence.
B. Additional Provisions.
Contractor shall ensure that the policies of insurance required under this
agreement contain, or are endorsed to contain, the following provisions.
1. The City shall be named as an additional insured on all policies excluding
Workers’ Compensation.
2. The contractor shall furnish certificates of insurance to the City before
commencement of work.
rev.7/14/95
dl
0 e
*
3. The contractor shall obtain occurrence coverage, excluding Professional
Liability which shall be written as claims-made coverage.
4. This insurance shall be in force during the life of the agreement and any
extension thereof and shall not be canceled without 30 days prior written notice to the City sent
by certified mail.
5. If the contractor fails to maintain any of the insurance coverages required
herein, then the City will have the option to declare the contractor in breach, or may purchase
replacement insurance or pay the premiums that are due on existing policies in order that the
required coverages may be maintained. The contractor is responsible for any payments made
by the City to obtain or maintain such insurance and the City may collect the same from the
contractor or deduct the amount paid from any sums due the contractor under this agreement.
27. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
The name of the persons who are authorized to give written notices or to receive written
notice on behalf of the City and on behalf of the Contractor in connection with the foregoing are
as follows:
For City: Tit le Associate Enaineer
Name Kenneth Quon
Address 2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009-1 576
For Contractor: Title v 1 cE l%.ESDdT
Name %WID ?**
-Mer Address & 4 k
#b?O tt6 S&rm c#u($c& &VC
Tw6*/ k1W4 fK7 01
rev.7/14/95
12
. e 0
3
28. BUSINESS LICENSE
Contractor shall obtain and maintain a City of Carlsbad Business License for the duration
of the contract.
Executed by Contractor this /4e day of &F?E~~AEL 1- 19 9s.
CONTRACTOR:
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal
corporation of the State of California
+f
$@4D QtlnrtdC ATTEST:
(print name here)
(title and organization of signatory)
VICE +W,WT rn!C 4 4Jorl47FL
a
(Proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by Contractor must be attached.)
(President or vice-president and secretary or assistant secretary must sign for corporations. If
only one officer signs, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or
assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering that officer to bind the corporation.)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RONALD R. BALL
rev.7/14/95
13
b 0 0
t
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of Arizona 1
1 County of Maricopa )
On this 14th day of September 1995, before me personally appeared David D. Perkins,
whom I know personally, and acknowledge that he executed the same.
Residing at
y a533 b- b\% bv e
d%ibL #qz SFa9fi
My Commission expires i -ao-c;
Jj-jZMJb ? 0.L-
Signature
Q/d/9 <
Date
b 0 0
CERTIFICATION OF SIGNATURE AUTHORITY I- . e--
RESOLVED, that the individuals on the list attached hereto as Eshibit A be appointed to the
officer positions set forth on Exhibit A. (Eshibit A included below)
RESOLVED, that Barry Marrus, Morris Rothenberg and Tom Stout be appointed Assistant
Secretaries of JHK.
RESOLVED, that the Board endorses the current signature authority in place at JHK until such
time as a modified signature authority policy is put in place.
CORPORATE BYLAWS ARTICLE V
It shall not be necessary to the validity of any instrument executed by any authorized officer or
officers of the Corporation that the esecution of such instrument be evidenced by the corporate seal, and all
documents, instruments, contracts and writings of all kinds signed on behalf of the Corporation by any authorized
officer or oficers shall be as effectual and binding on the Corporation without the corporate seal, as if the
execution of the same had been evidenced by aising the corporate seal thereto. The Board may give gcncral
authority to any oficcr to afis the seal of the Corporation and to attest the afising by signature.
EXHIBIT A AUTHORIZED OFFICERS OF THE CORPORATION, amended November 3, 1994
Chief Executive Oficer- Jack L. Kay
President, Transportation Consulting Divisiow Morris J. Rothenberg
President, Transportation Systems Division- Toni L. Stout
Senior Vice President- Barry S. Marrus
Vice President/Administration- Gary C. Bowen
Vice President- Alan Clelland
Vice President- Owen P. Curtis
Vice President- William R. Loudon
Vice President- Louis G. Neudorff
Vice President- David P. Perkins
Vice President- Robert 6. Rausch
Vice President- Steven A. Smith
Associate Vice President- Blanche B. Buergler
Associate Vice President- Michael C. Connors
Associate Vice President- Serop Der-Boghossian
Associate Vice President- Mark A. Flak
Associate Vice President- Timothy A. Ryan
Associate Vice President- David B. Roden
Associate Vice President- Donald R. Sanidahl
Associate Vice President- Douglas C. Terry
Associate Vice President- Fred R. White
Associate Vice PresidentJFinance- Debra S. Wilkinson
I, Barry S. Marrus, Assistant Secretary of JHK & Associates, Inc. , hereby certifL that the foregoing is
_-
a true copy of the Corporate Resolutions and By-laws, duly and legally adopted by the Board of Directors of said
corporation, at a legal meeting of the Board duly and regularly held June 16 - 17, 1994.
s not been amended or revoked and is still in full force and effect.
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA I
ON/tloll- 7 , lmlxfore me, C. Hcster-Alvaro, Notary I’ublic,
personally appeared Tack L. Kav and Barry S. Marrus
)2$personally known to me OR 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
person(s) whose name(s) &/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/ they executed the same in his/her/ their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
* 0 0 EXHIBIT JHK & Associates, Inc.
10260 Campus Point Drive
San Diego, California 92121-1522
619 458-2111
619 458-2122 FAX
September 8, 1995
Mr. Kenneth W. Quon
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
RE:
JHK & Associates
An SAlC Company
Proposal for Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis
Shelley Tract Map, CT 90-03 (JHK 1960123)
Dear Mr. Quon:
JHK & Associates is pleased to submit this revised proposal to conduct a traffic impact
analysis for the Shelley residential development in the City of Carlsbad. The traffic
impact analysis will follow the format of JHK’s previous traffic impact analysis of the
site, but will be a stand-alone document which takes into account the revised
development plan as well as current traffic conditions. This proposal is prepared in
response to your Request for Proposal dated June 23, 1995.
This proposal is divided into the following sections:
0 Scope of Work
- >- 0 Schedule
0 Staffing
e Qualifications
0 Fee
Additional information is provided in the attachments.
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 - Project Initiation
JKK staff members will meet with the City of Carlsbad and the project applicant to
review the project. This task will also include an update of general information to be
compatible with the revised project. Project requirements, schedules, and deliverables
will be documented.
Task 2 - Existing Conditions
Existing traffic conditions will be updated with new traffic count information to be
supplied by the City of Carlsbad. No new traffic counts by JHK are included in this
proposal. JHK has reviewed the previous study area for the project as well as the data
i JK 0 0
*
Mr. Kenneth W. Quon
September 8, 1995
Page Two
available at the City and we are confident that a reasonable base of existing traffic
conditions can be developed using current counts or minor adjustments to previous
counts. The study area and methodology for the existing conditions analysis will be thc
same as was used in the previous traffic impact analysis (Shellev Tract Map Traffic
Impact Analvsis, JHK & Associates, January 20, 1993).
Task 3 - Trip GeneratiodDistributiodAssignment
Trip generation, distribution, and assignment will generally be conducted using the
methodology and parameters used in the previous study. However, the parameters used
in the study will be updated to reflect current conditions.
Task 4 - Future Traffic Conditions
Future traffic conditions will be analyzed for the following alternative future scenarios:
0 Existing Plus Project
0 Year 2000 Plus Project
0 Buildout No Project
0 Buildout Plus Project
This analysis will generally be conducted using the methodology and parameters used
in the previous study. However, the parameters used in the previous study will be
updated to reflect current conditions. The Year 2000 and Buildout traffic forecasts
without the project will be determined using the most current SANDAG traffic forecasts
for the City of Carlsbad. The study area for the analysis of future traffic conditions will
be the same as in the previous traffic impact analysis.
Task 5 - Site AccessLntersection ControUSignal Warrants
JHK will update the section of the report which deals with site access, intersection
control, and signal warrants based on the revisions which have occurred to the site plan.
Task 6 - Mitigation Measures
In cases where streets and intersections are not expected to meet City standards for the
scenarios described above, JHK will develop appropriate mitigation measures. This
could include written descriptions of such improvements as street widening, addition oj
turn lanes, signalization, signing, and other measures which could be used to improvc
safety and capacity.
4 JW 0 0
t
Mr. Kenneth W. Quon
September 8, 1995
Page Three
Task 7 - Congestion Management Plan
An analysis will be conducted to determine the impacts of the project with respect to
San Diego County Congestion Management Plan reporting requirements. This analysis
will be conducted in accordance with Attachment A of the RFP. JHK has reviewed the
Scope of Work outlined in Attachment A to determine whether any additional analysis
will be required beyond what is described in Tasks 1 through 6 above. Most of the CMP
requirements can be handled by re-formatting or re-stating analyses which are to be
conducted in Tasks 1 through 6. However, it will be required to conduct intersection
analyses using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Chapter 9 methodology, since this
is required for CMP analyses, but is not normally included in traffic impact analyses
conducted in the City of Carlsbad. With this addition, JHK is confident that the CMP
requirements will be met. If major additional work items are requested by an outside
review agency, the additional work will be considered outside the scope of work.
Task 8 - Project Documentation
The results of the analysis described above will be documented in a Supplemental Final
Report which follows the format of the previous traffic impact report. Seven (7) copies
of an Administrative Draft and seven (7) copies of a Draft Supplemental Report will be
submitted as well as ten (10) copies of a Final Report which incorporates comments
received from the City. One camera-ready reproducible copy and a Wordperfect 5.1 disk
of the Final Report will also be submitted.
SCHEDULE
The estimated schedule for the project is as follows:
Milestone
Initiation Meeting 1 week
Future Conditions Analysis 4 weeks
Administrative Draft Final Report 6 weeks
City Review Completed 8 weeks
Draft Final Report 10 weeks
City Review Completed 12 weeks
Final Report 14 weeks
Time From Notice To Proceed
* e 0
Mr. Kenneth W. Quon
September 8, 1995
Page Four
STAFFING
This project will be conducted by the following key JHK staff members in the roles
indicated below.
0 David Perkins, Vice President: Responsible Officer
Erik Ruehr, Principal Engineer: Project Manager
Brad Thornton, Transportation Analyst: Project Engineer
0
0
Resumes for each of the staff members listed above are included in the attachments.
QUALIFICATIONS
JHK’s primary statement of quatifications for the proposed effort is the firm’s work 01 the previous traffic impact analysis conducted for the site. Project descriptions for thi!
and other traffic impact projects are included in the attachments. In addition, JHK ha!
conducted the City of Carlsbad Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Progran
for each of the past several years.
FEE
JHK proposes to conduct the tasks described above for a fixed price of $14,150. A COS
breakdown which was used to develop this fixed fee is shown in the attachments.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. If you have any questions 01
JHK’s approach, please contact our proposed project manager, Mr. Erik Ruehr.
Sincerely,
SSOCIATES
David D. Perkins
Vice President
Attachment
0 Dav 9 D. Perkins, P.E.
Title Vice PresidentIRegional Manager
Education
Years of
Experience
Professional Professional Engineer (Civil 1978)
Registrations Arizona, New Mexico, Michigan
Professional
Affiliations Southern Arizona Transportation Council Transportation Research Board
Summary
Wayne State University, MSCE - 1978, BSCE - 1975
Nineteen Years (Ten years with JHK & Associates)
Institute of Transportation Engineers (Arizona Section and National)
Mr. Perkins has conducted and/or directed a variety of challenging assignments
including interstate and arterial corridor studies, traffic operations and design,
environment assessments, transportation planning studies, highway inventories, and
highway safety research. Mr. Perkins has successfully developed and implemented
public involvement plans for controversial roadway projects. He currently serves as
Regional Manager for the Southwest Region of JHK.
Freeway Signing Upgrade, M-39, Wayne County, 1-96, Wayne County:, 1-675,
Saginaw County, 1-75 Signing Plans, Detroit, Michigan;- Mr. Perkins was
Responsible Officer for the development of base mapping and design of a freeway
signing upgrade for 30 miles of interstate highway in Michigan. The plans were
prepared entirely on JHKs computer-aided-design (CAD) system. Existing roadway
geometry was constructed using as-built roadway plans. A complete inventory of
existing signs was developed using existing plans, field reviews, and videotaping of the
corridor. The proposed sign upgrades were then designed and added to the plans, and the
bid package was completed with sign format details, cost estimates and specifications.
Michigan Department of Transportation Traffic Signals - Mr. Perkins was responsible
officer for design of the retrofit of 15 existing traffic signals, and the design of two new signals within District 6 (east central portion of state) of the Michigan Department of Transportation. The retrofit designs involved field location determinations for new
traffic signal heads, span and messenger wire, poles, power connections as well as new
signal controllers. The signals were located on urban, arterial type roadways withm the
Cities of Flint, Saginaw, Lapeer, and Corunna.
Corridor Studies Wetmore-Ruthrauff Road Alignment Study, Pima County, Arizona - Mr. Perkins served as Project Manager and Responsible Officer for the development of design
concept and location documents for a 4-mile arterial roadway in a suburban area of Pima
County. The study involved roadway geometric design, right-of-way definition, and
public involvement. The study resulted in programming of a $10 million corridor
development project.
Park Link Drive Alignment Study, Pinal County, Arizona - Mr. Perkins served as
Project Manager and Responsible Officer to develop and evaluate alternative roadway
alignments in rural Pinal County. The study involved environmental investigation,
roadway geometric design, public involvement, and change of freeway access
documentation.
Project Assessment, Arizona Department of Transportation - Mr. Perkins managed the
preparation of six project assessments in rural and urban environments. The assessments resulted in preliminary design and cost estimates for truck climbing lanes,
passing lanes, intersection improvements, and pavement rehabilitation.
Marsh Station Interchange, Pima County Arizona - Mr. Perkins served as Responsible
Officer for the preparation of design concept and environmental assessment documents
for an 1-10 interchange. The project involved preliminary design and cost estimates of
roadway, structures, drainage, and interchange configuration alternatives.
Relevant Experience
J H K & Associal
07/94 I.(< An SAlC Company
,
I e Da la, D. Perkins, P.E.
Freeway Management System Prototype Design, Pima County, Arizona - Mr.
Perkins served as Project Manager for functional design of freeway traffic management
technologies on I- 10 in Pima County. Technologies included ramp metering, traffic
monitoring, closed circuit television, and changeable message signs.
Freeway Management System Before and Afrer Evaluation, Phoenix, Arizona - Mr.
Perkins served as Responsible Officer and Project Manager for a study to conduct an
effectiveness evaluation of a $20 million ADOT freeway management system.
Measures of evaluation effectiveness included travel time, speed, driver behavior, accidents, air quality, and noise. The study included data collection and statistical
analysis.
US 64 Scoping Report, Taos, New Mexico - Mr. Perkins served as Responsible
Officer for a study to define operation, maintenance, and safety improvements for a
20-mile rural New Mexico roadway near Taos.
US 448 Scoping Report, Corralles, New Mexico - Mr. Perkins served as Responsible Officer for a corridor scoping study in Corralles, New Mexico. The study included
historic resources, safety assessment, traffic operations, and public involvement.
Downtown Land Use and Circulation Study, Phase II (DLUCS II), Tucson, Arizona - Project Manager responsible for coordination with City staff, citizen participation
program, and quality control for all aspects of the project including traffic engineering,
geometric roadway design, right-of-way, utilities, hydrology, environmental
assessment, and plan production.
The citizen participation program involved presentations to Mayor and Council, 16
meetings with a Citizen Advisory Committee, and numerous neighborhood and other
public meetings.
The design concept for DLUCS I1 consisted of preliminary roadway plans and profiles
that described the design requirements and impacts resulting from the project.
Right-of-way plans and structural design concepts supplemented the preliminary
roadway plans. Urban design and public art also were key elements in the design
concept.
Preparation of an environmental document was prepared to update work performed in a
1985 Environmental Assessment. The environmental assessment considered the effect
of the DLUCS I1 alignment on right-of-way, cultural resources, noise and air quality
levels, drainage, utilities, access, displacement of hazardous materials, and community
and economic impacts.
I-IO Corridor Improvements, Tucson, Arizona - Project Manager for a 28-mile interstate
corridor study of 1-10 in Pima County for the Arizona Department of Transportation.
The project consisted of preliminary design of roadway, drainage, facilities, utilities,
structures, and right-of-way. Environmental assessments and public hearings were
conducted.
I-IO General Plan Maintenance, Tucson, Arizona - Co-Project Manager for the
preparation of right-of-way "results-of-survey'' and final ADOT right-of-way plans for
eight miles of 1-10 in Pima County.
Speedway Boulevard Alignment Study, Stone Avenue to Euclid Avenue, Tucson, Arizona - Project Manager for the development of roadway geometrics, right-of-way
plans, and environmental mitigation for a one-mile urban arterial in Tucson, Arizona.
The project included extensive public involvement, consensus building, and public
hearings.
I-IO Post-Design Services, I-I9 to Kino Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona - Project Manager for ADOT on call traffic engineering and design services. Assignments included preparation of design plans for ramp signals and detectors and truck detour route
assessment.
JHK & Associal
07/94 I.(< An SAlC Company
Page 2
e Da .Ld) D. Perkins, P.E.
Oracle Rodorange Grove Road Intersection Study, Tucson, Arizona - Project Manager
for the design of arterial interchange concepts and application of advanced (NHS) signal
control strategies in Pima County. This effort resulted in securing over $4 million in
Federal funding for interchange construction as a demonstration project.
I- IO/I-17 Corridor Improvements, Phoenix, Arizona - Directed the day-to-day activities
of the I-10/1-17 Freeway Corridor Study in Phoenix, Arizona. In this study, both
physical improvements and traffic control schemes were developed for a 50-mile
corridor. Both short-term and 20-year plans were developed totally over $750 million in construction costs. The corridor improvement plans resulting from this study serve as the basis for ongoing freeway design and construction activities in Phoenix by ADOT.
FHWA Procedural Guidelines - Principal investigator and instructor for over 25 training
courses for state and local highway agencies. Mr. Perkins developed the user’s guide
and training courses for numerous technical areas including sign vandalism
countermeasures, highway safety evaluation, and highway inventories.
Basewide Trafslc and Safety Study for Hill Air Force Base, Ogden, Utah - Project Manager for a basewide traffic study for Hill Air Force Base in Utah. As a part of this
project, Mr. Perkins directed an extensive origin-destination survey of approximately
22,000 military and civilian base personnel. Circulation plans and roadway needs
recommendations were developed and programmed during this study.
Occupant Restraint Usage in 19 U.S. Cities, Nationwide - Mr. Perkins managed a
nationwide safety belt observation study for the U.S. Department of Transportation,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. As part of this study, over 250,000
observations of occupant restraint use were recorded annually and approximately
150,000 license plate numbers were submitted on magnetic tape to 15 state department
of motor vehicles and resulting vehicle data were analyzed using the VINDICATOR
program. Data resulting from this study was used by the Federal government and
Congress to establish safety belt standards and regulations.
Highway Safety Research, Nationwide - Performed and/or managed highway safety
projects for both federal and state agencies. He served as Principal Investigator on
FHWA projects that resulted in guidelines for evaluating highway safety projects and
programs, for implementing safety programs in rural and small urban areas, and for
implementing safety programs to reduce the vandalism of highway signs. Other
FHWA safety research involved investigating the feasibility of using surrogates for
state and local accident data in safety analyses. NHTSA contract work included the
establishment of two National Accident Sampling System units in Michigan and the
collection and analysis of safety belt and child safety seat data in 19 cities throughout
the United States.
Training Course Development and Instruction, Nationwide - Mr. Perkins has conducted
over 25 training courses for state and local highway agencies. Under contract to
FHWA, he developed the user‘s guide and training course entitled, “Highway Safety
Evaluation” and conducted over 15 courses for state hghway agencies under contract to
the National Highway Institute. He also served as a secondary instructor for two other
FHWA courses including Highway Safety Engineering Studies and Highway Safety
Improvement Program. Mr. Perkins was an instructor on a 3-day training course on the
Highway Capacity Manual for the Oahu Metropolitan Planning Organization and for
the University of California (Berkeley) Institute of Traffic Studies. He also developed
and taught two courses on Driveway Access Regulation for the New Mexico State
Highway and Transportation Department. He has also served as an adjunct professor at
Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan, and taught graduate level courses in
traffic operations, traffic flow theory, and transportation systems management.
Neighborhood Protection Policy and Procedures, Tucson, Arizona - Project Manager for
the development of a policy and procedure for implementing neighborhood traffic management and control strategies for the city of Tucson, Arizona.
Research, Safety, Transportation Planning and Other Experience
JHK & Associal
07/94 JX An SAlC Company
Page 3
Da vck D. Perkins, P.E.
Driveway and Median Opening Policies for Nonaccess Controlled Highways in New
Mexico, Santa Fe, New Mexico - Project Manager for the update of driveway and
median opening regulations for the state of New Mexico. Training course materials
were developed and presented in two training courses to New Mexico Highway
Department district engineers.
Circulation Element of General Plan, Chula Vista, California - Project Director for
Update of the Circulation Element for the Chula Vista General Plan for the city of Chula Vista, California - Responsible for developing a long-range circulation plan to
meet Year 2010 travel demands.
Downtown Tra#c and Parking Study, Escondido, California - Project Director for the
Traffic and Parking Study for the Escondido Downtown Revitalization Area for the
Escondido Downtown Revitalization Commission. Responsible for developing
transportation, parking, and safety improvements for downtown Escondido, California.
Cost-Effective Inventory Procedures for Highway Data, FHWA - Principal Investigator involved in development of an informational booklet comparing methods of data
acquisition storage, retrieval, and updating for inventories of roadwayhoadside features and appurtenances.
Arizona Occupant Restraint Survey, Statewide - Project Director for Statewide Child
RestraintEafety Belt Usage Survey. Three separate surveys were conducted in
accordance with NHTSA survey guidelines. The survey was performed in six urban and
rural areas in Arizona.
Master Transportation Plan, Marana, Arizona - Project Principal in a study to provide
the Town of Marana and the Arizona Department of Transportation with a phased
transportation improvement plan. Developed a staged implementation plan to achieve
the long-range concept.
Countermeasures for Sign Vandalism for FHWA (DTFH-61-82-C-00087) - Principal
Investigator involved in literature review, patent search and contacts with state agencies
to identify measures for reducing the occurrence and cost associated with mutilation,
destruction, and theft of traffic signs. Identified countermeasures are included in a
manual for development of antivandalism programs at the federal, state, and local levels.
Evaluation of the Highway Safety Program for Kalamazoo County, Michigan - Project
Engineer involved in the evaluation of highway safety projects in the areas of traffic
engineering, driver training, and education.
Transportation Data Management System for the Ann Arbor Urban Area Transportation
Committee - Project Director involved in determination of highway agency data needs,
identification of computer hardware and software options, and preparation of system
design and functional specifications.
Computerized Highway Information Systems, Nationwide - Project Director for the
computerized inventory for signs and markings for Charleston, South Carolina;
computerized traffic sign inventory for Inkster, Michigan; computerized sign inventory
for Washtenaw County, Michigan; sign inventory for Wyandotte, Michigan;
computerized sign inventory and school crossing study for Dearborn Heights, Michigan;
sign upgrading program, Hamtramck, Michigan; photo logging and sign inventory for
the cities of Holland and Benton Harbor, Michigan; and photo logging and sign
inventory for Oakland County Michigan Road Commission.
"Computerized Inventory and Priority Analysis for Roadside Obstacles," Transportation
Research Board, presented at TRB meeting in January 1978, and published in TRB
Record Number 679 (with Richard Cunard and Tapan Datta).
"A Procedure for Evaluating Completed Highway Safety Projects," Transportation
Research Board, presented at the TRB meeting in January 1979, and published in TRB
Record Number 709 (with Tapan Datta and Rudolph Umbs).
Publications
JHK & Associs
07/94 I.(< An SAC Company
Page 4
.x e Da @ D. Perkins, P.E.
"Effect of Shoulder Width and Condition on Safety: A Critique of the State-of-the-&,''
TransDortation Research Board, presented at TRB meeting in January 1980, and
published in TRB Record Number 757 (with C.V. Zegeer).
"A Methodology for Solving Residential Traffic Problems Using a Total Systems
Approach," accepted for presentation at the 1980 ITE 50th Annual Meeting and
publication in compendium of papers (with Dennis Randolph and Mark Flak).
Computerized Data Management System for Traffic Control Device Maintenance
Activities. ASCE Compendium of Papers for 1983 Conference (with Karl Kleitsch).
Guidelines for Evaluating Completed Highway Safety Projects Using Nonaccident
Safety Measures. Presentation at 1983 TRB meeting and publication in TRB Record
905, (with Brian Bowman).
Surrogate Measures for Accident Experience at Rural isolated Horizontal Curves.
Presentation at 1983 TRB meeting and publication in TRB Record 905, (with Harold
Thompson).
Candidate Accident Surrogates for Use in Highway Safety Analysis. Presentation at
1983 TRB meeting and publication in TRB Record 905, (with Harold Thompson).
Infrastructure Inventories - The Starting Point for Effective Highway Management," ITE Journal, February 1986, (with Kenneth Opiela).
"Mandatory Seat Belt Laws - An Arizona Perspective," SAE Technical Paper Series,
August 1986, (with Louis A. Schmitt).
"The Impact of Worksite-Based Health Risk Appraisal Programs on Observed Safety
Belt Use," May 1987, (with Sabina M. Dunton and Karen J. Zopf).
"Local Calibration of Traffic Factors in Freeway Capacity Analyses," (with Michael F.
Holling).
"A Decision Support System for Freeway Corridor Analysis," January 1987, (with
Ronald C. Pfefer).
"The Impact of Worksite-based Health Risk Appraisal Programs on Observed Safety
Belt Use," Health Education Research Theory and Practice, Vol. J, No. 2, 1990 (with
Sabina Dunton and Karen Zopf).
"Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering - 13th Edition" Institute of Transportation
Studies. University of California at Berkeley, UCB-ITS-CN-92-1, 1992 (with
Wolfgang S. Homburger and James H. Kell).
JHK & Associatl
07/94 JW An SAlC Company
Page 5
.' m Erik 0. Ruehr, P.E. .\ -
Title Principal Engineer
Education
Ym. of Erperience
Pro fessionai Regktrations California, Minnesota, Washington, Florida
Pmfmionui Institute of Transportation Engineers Afilkztions Transportation Research Board
University of Michigan, MSCE - 1981; BSCE - 1979
Fourteen Years (Nine Years with JHK & Associates)
Professional Engineer - Civil 1983
Professional Engineer - Traffic 1986 California
Mr. Ruehr is a Principal Engineer and Manager of JHK's San Diego office. He specializes in the area of traffic operatioas and has ovet 14 years of experience in a variety of traffic engineering and transportatim planning projects. His experience
includes travel, forecasting, traffic engineering research. traffic signal timing, signal design, preliminary roadway design, parking studies. and traffic impact analysis. Mr. Ruehr's project experience is summarized below.
Project manager for the preparation and installatim of traffic signal thing plans in Berkeley, California (71 signals); Anoka County, Minnesota (14 signals); La Quinta, California (8 signals); Hemet, California (7 signals); and Eden Prairie, Minnesota (4 signals).
Project manager for on-call traffic signal design services for Caltrans District 11 (San
Diego, Imperial, and Riverside Counties).
Project engineer responsible for the design of ramp meters and changeable message signs at two interchanges along Interstate 5 in San Diego.
Responsible for the preparation of traffic signal designs at over 40 intersections in California, Arizona, and Minnesota.
Project engineer for traffic signal system studies in Casper, Wyoming (83 signals),
AM Arbor, Michigan (135 signals) and Davenport, Iowa (34 signals) with responsibility for signal cmdination analysis.
Project engineer and director of technical analysis for the Green River Valley Interagency Signal Coordination Study in Seattle, Washington.
Project manager for the design and implementation of a real-time traffic control system to prevent air quality violations in St. Paul, Minnesota.
s-ry
Tra fJc Signa 1 OperatiomlDesign
Intelligent Transportation System
Transportahbn Respoclsible for preparation of travel focecasting models and comprehensive Planning transportation plans in Danville and Palm Springs, Califmia and Durango, Colorado.
Project engineer with responsibility for traffic engineering analysis for transportation
plans conducted in Brawley, California; Ann Arbor, Michigan; Fwd du Lac, Wisconsin: and Northfield, Minnesota.
Project engineer for the Cajalco Tollway feasibility study in Riverside County, California Responsibilities included preparation of toll revenue forecasts and estimates of diversion of traffic due to toll road implementation.
Project engineer for bikeway planning studies in Chula Vista, California and Toledo, Ohio.
Project manager for preparation of a computerized bicycle accident records system for
the City of San Diego.
Project manager for on-call traffic engineering services for Caltrans District 11 (Sari
Diego, Imperial, and Riverside Counties).
Traffic Engineering
JHK & Associates Page 1 JX &.SJCtamny
.. ,' a 0 Erik 0. Ruehr, P.E.
Project manager for traffic engineering assistance to the City of Danville. California in the role of City T&IC Engineer. 'This included review of traffic impact studies and site plans for development projects, preparation of signing and striping plans, + studies, and response to citizen requests on a variety of traffic engindg issues.
Project engineer for preliminary design studies of Woodlawn Avenue in Chula Vista, Califha and El Norte Parkway in Escondido, California.
Project manager for comprehensive traffic engineering study for the City of Dublin, California, including high accident intersection analysis, speed studies, traffic control device inventory, and the development of an accident records database.
Project engineer for downtown parking studies in Carkbad, Santa Barbara and Concord. California
Project manager for the SR125 Tollway Corridor Study. This study included transportation and traffic analysis of an eleven-mile toll roadway in the southern portion of San Diego County.
Project manager for transportatim and traffic analysis of the proposed SR56 freeway
in the City of San Diego's North City Future Urbanizing Area This project was conducted as part of an Enviromental Impact Report for the middle section of SR56.
Project engineer and director of technical analysis for the SR91 Corridor Study in
Riverside, California This project included the installation of HOV lanes, interchange improvements, and ramp meters along a twenty-mile freeway corridor.
Project engineer in charge of traffic engineering for alternatives analysis and environmental analysis of four light rail transit corridors in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Project engineer and director of traffic engineering analysis for light rail transit feasibility study in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Project manager for the transportatim and parking analysis of the College Community
Redevelopment Project in the City of San Diego. JHK's role in this project included a major public participation component, assistance to the City in preparation of a
public facilities financing plan, and coordination with MTDB regarding plans for the East Mission Valley extension of the San Diego Trolley.
Project manager for traffic impact analyses conducted for over 30 large and small development projects throughout California, as well as additional studies in several other states.
Project engineer for traffic impact analysis of the Mayhew light rail transit station and adjacent development in Sacramento, California.
Project manager for development of guidelines for the preparation of traffic impact analysis in Monroe County, Florida.
Project engineer for highway capacity research projects foc freeway weaving sections and multilane rural roads. The weaving study included collection of traffic flow data at several test sites, as weU as analysis of a large database of weaving operations throughout the US. This study led to the development of the weaving capacity procedure used in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual.
Project engineer for traffic engineering research conducted for the FHWA regarding the use of traffic detectors for the automatic updating of signal timing plans. This concept, known as 1.5 Generation Control, was evaluated at test sites in Tallahas-,
Florida and Los Angeles using the 7"SYT-7F signal timing model.
Cornifor Studies
TraJJc Impact Analysic;
Reseaxh
Page 2 JHK & Associates JK hWCW
,' ' ~~ m Bradley L. 23orntort .\
Title Transportation Analyst
Education
Years of Ejcpenence
Profesr;iod Afllidons
2 years completed at San Diego City College. Engineering
Five Years (Four with JHK & Associates)
Member, Institute of Transporration Engineers Member, Southwestern Region TRANPLAN Model User's Group
Summary Mr. Thornton is a Transportation Analyst at JHK & Associates. He has five years experience as a transportation analyst and has been involved in a variety of traffic engineering and transportation planning projects. Mr. Thornton's project experience is summanied below.
Currently serving as project engineer for the transportation and traffic analysis on the proposed SR56 freeway in the City of San Diego's North City Future Urbanizing Area. Responsibilities include review of existing environmental constraints and development of peak hour turn movements to perform segment and intersection capacity analysis. Also responsible for documenting the results of the study and preparing a final traffic/transportation technical reprt to be incorporated into the Em.
Project engineer for the SR125 Corridor Study in San Diego County. Responsible for refinement of forecasted model traffic volumes and traffic operational analysis including the training and supervision of Caltrans staff in signalized intersection capacity analysis utilizing Highway Capacity software.
Participated in the State Route 91 HOV Study. Conducted the capacity analysis for ramp junctions, freeway mainlines, signalized and unsignalized intersections, and interchange components. The analysis was based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual and recent TRB paper entitled "Analysi: Procedures for Freeway Interchange Areas".
Participated in the I-25fl-40 Major Investment Study (Big "I" systerr interchange) in the State of New Mexico. Performed simple and multiple weaving analysis for weaving areas adjacent to the Big "I" system interchange for both No Build and Build alternatives.
Performed operational analysis utilizing PASSER-2 software to optimize signal timing and cycle lengths for eight intersections on Washington Street
and Florida Avenue for the County of Riverside.
Currently sewing as project engineer in an effort to develop the East Valley Transportation Model for the Cities of San Bernardino, Colton, Grand Terrace, Rialto, Redlands, Highland, and Loma Linda. Mr. Thornton is using the SCAG regional model in TRANPLAN format on an EBM/RISC 6000 workstation. He is responsible for the development of the highway network at the local level, extracting land use and socioeconomic data formulating the model structure and performing model fulls for a wide am] of alternatives, Responsible for coordinating with the staff of SCAG anc other local jurisdictions in the model validation process.
Participated in researcwtesting of the unsignalized module of the new 199~ HCM software. The testing of TWSC and AWSC revisions and nea procedures helped insure quality control and facilitated the release of tht new software.
Trafic Engineering
Travel Demand Forecasting
Transportation Research
Page 1 JHK & Associates AM k%cangn).
,+ Bradley L. Thornton
.%
Data Collection Responsible for data coIIection for the City of Carlsbad Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program for the years 1991 through 1994. Supervised turning movement counts at 47 intersections anc directional traffic volume counts at 27 mid-block locations. Developed ICU analysis and stop delay program software to assist in ICU research anc intersection LOS analysis.
Supervised and performed data collection for the City of San Diegc Intersection LeveI of Service Study. Responsible for measuring stoppec delay, prevailing saturation flow rate, physical inventory, turning movements, and videotaping vehicle movement and queue propagation foi 14 intersections.
Coordinated data collection for the SDSU Foundation Redevelopmen] Project EIR. Supervised the turning movement counts at 19 signalized anc unsignalized intersections and directiod traffic volume counts at four mid. block locations.
Assembled turning movements for mort than 400 intersections from the City of San Diego traffic volume database for the SANDAG Arterial LOS study.
Conducted and supervised turning movement counts for the Chula Vista Growth Management Program, Rancho San Miguel Traffic Study, City of Commerce Traffic Study, San Marcos Town Center Traffic Study, Rancho Bernardino Shopping Plaza TrafficParking Study, and Chula Vita Mid Bayfront Traffic Study.
Transportation Performed analysis to determine toll revenues for the Cajalco Comdor/SR Planning 91 Double Deck Toll Feasibility Report to the Riverside County Transportation Commission. Prepared spreadsheets to determine an( analyze toll revenues which could be expected to occur under variou: scenarios of toll roadway construction.
Responsible for site selection and data collectiodreduction for the City o San Diego Shared Parking Study. Supervised data collection efforts at 7; parking facilities to include Hotel, Cinema, Office, Medical, Restaurant Residential, Retail and Mixed-use sites. Coordinated with propeq managedleasing agents to document individual site characteristics pertinen to the study.
Page 1 JHK & Associates I.(< hWcanPy
0 0 '* b' .-
*
JHK QUALIFICATIONS
P 0 e B' .<
QUALIFICATIONS
Shelley Property Tract Map Traffic Analysis Report
Carlsbad, California (JHK 2155)
JHK prepared a traffic impact analysis report to be included as part of the EIR to address any environmental issues associated with the project. The primary focus of the study was to document existing conditions, identify all required modifications to the adopted General Plan Circulation Element, and address any problems and concerns that developed as a resuIt of the traffic generated by the proposed project. The traffic evaluation was based on the Final Land Use Plan development and updated the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Carlsbad.
Client Contact
M.F. Ponseggi & Associates Ms. Marilyn Ponseggi
922 Denise Lane
El Cajun, California 92020
(61 9) 111-8217
San Diego State University Foundation EIR
San Diego, California (JHK 1526)
JHK is conducting this project for the City of San Diego and the San Diego State University Foundation under subcontract to Cotton/Beland/Associates. The redevelopment project which is the subject of the EIR includes residential, commercial, and office development to be located on or near the SDSU campus. Part of the reason for implementing the new development is to encourage SDSU students to live and shop near the campus. It has been a goal of the San Diego region to reduce the number of trips generated at SDSU which use the regional roadway system. A determination of how well this goal can be achieved is a key issue in JHK's study. Other key issues include the following:
b
The preparation of a multi-modal transportation plan to serve the proposed development. Parking generation of the project, including opportunities for shared parking.
Residential traffic control in adjacent neighborhoods. Impact of related developments including special events at the new SDSU Student Activity
Center, potential extension of a trolley line into the SDSU campus, and future roadway improvements under study by Caltrans.
An additional feature of the study is an active community participation program. Several public
meetings were specifically devoted to discussions of the transportation and parking analysis.
Client Conlact
CottonlBeland Associates Mr. John Btidges
6310 Greenwich Drive, Silite 220
Son Diego, California 92122
(61 9) 625-0056
0 0 <?
*A ' *
Hollandia Traffic Impact Study EIR
San Marcos, California (JHK 8830)
JHK & Associates prepared a traffic impact study report for inclusion in the EIR for the proposed Hollandia development project in the City of San Marcos. The proposed plan included development of residential units, park, school, and shopping center on land that is currently occupied by a dairy fm. The traffic impact study included analysis of existing conditions,
generation and distribution of future traffic, comparison of the proposed plan with the City's future
circulation element, and development of appropriate mitigation measures.
Client Contact
CottontBeIand Associates Mr. John Bridges 6310 Greenwich Drive, Suite 220
Snn Diego, California 92122
(619) 625-0056
Las Montanas Traffic Impact Study
La Mesa, California {JHK 3001.5)
The traffic analysis performed on the referenced project utilized a previous study prepared
for the project to determine project trip distribution and base traffic volumes for the interim (Year 1995) condition. JHK & Associates perfonned a reanalysis of existing and buildout conditions. The buildout analysis utilized the most recent version of the Combined Southbay Transportation Model available from SANDAG. JHK modified the model to determine buildout trip distribution
and impacts on SR 94 with access to the project site. The methodologies, assumptions and
findings of the traffic analysis were documented in a Technical Report for client and County review.
Client Contact
LME Investors Ms.Caro1 I. Henderson
5360 Jackson Drive. SIC. 212 La Mesa, California 91942-3010 (619) 162-7793
Escondido Home Depot
E sco n dido, California (JHK 20112)
The existing owners of Home Depot in Escondido desired expanded facilities for customers so a new store was designed at a location one block from the existing store. As part of the
environmental impact report, JHK analyzed the effects of new trips to be generated by the relocated Home Depot. The new site included 130 ksf Home Depot store, commercial shops, restaurants, a retail grocery store, and single family residential units.
Client Contact
CottontB eland Associates Mr. John Bridges
6310 Greenwich Drive, Suire 220
San Diego, California 92122
(61 9) 625-0056
e<v A\ 0 0
i
Encina Power Plant Traffic Analysis
Carlsbad, California (JHK 135.5)
JHK was responsible for completing the traffic analysis for the Encina Power Plan development site in Carlsbad, California. This project involved an analysis of future developmen
alternatives at this site. The traffic analysis addressed both project impacts and impacts resultin1 from cumulative development in the study area. The Project Team worked with City staff in thc development of feasible mitigation measures for the project.
Client Contact
Tetra Tech, Inc. Mr. CVilliam Brownlie
381 West Hospitaliry Lane, Suite 300 Sun Bertiardino, Calijiortiia 92408
(711) 381-1674
San Marcos Town Center EIR
San Marcos, California (JHK 2900)
This study focused on identifying the traffic impacts caused by the development of the Cit] Hall, library, theater, sports club, and commercial offices in the Heart-of-the-City specific plai area in the City of San Marcos. Specific attention was paid to analyzing the operation of the SR 71 interchanges and the Twin Oaks Valley Road comdor.
Contact Client
CottonlBeland Associates Mr. John Bridges
6310 GreenMdch Drive, Suite 220
Sat1 Diego, California 92122
(61 9) 62.5-0056
4% <’ ‘). 0 a
I \’ i
FIXED FEE COST BREAKDOWN
\
w' 'I -\ I e e *
Shelley Tract Map Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis Cost Estimate JHK & Associates August 8, 1995
Vice Principal n& President Engineer Engineer TecWClencal w
1. Initiation 2 2 2 4 10 2. Existing Conditions 0 2 8 2 12 3. Trip Generation 0 4 4 2 10 4. Future Conditions 0 8 18 8 34 5. Site Access 0 2 4 2 8
8. Documentation 4 12 24 48 88
6. Mitigation 2 8 16 16 42 7. CMP 0 8 8 24 40
TOTAL 8 46 84 106 244
COST $1,200 $4,140 $4,200 $3,710 $13,250 HOURLY RAE $150 $90 $50 $35
DIRECT
EXPENSES $900
TOTAL $14,150