HomeMy WebLinkAboutKimley-Horn & Associates; 2000-05-08; PWENG146AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EXTEND THE AGREEMENT FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR FARADAY AVENUE
EXTENSION FROM ORION WAY TO MELROSE AVENUE
(KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES)
This Amendment No. 3 is entered into and effective as of the 2ND day of November 2001, extending the agreement dated May 8, 2000
(the “Agreement”) by and ‘between the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as “City”, Carlsbad Municipal Water District, a Public Agency
organized under the Municipal Water Act of 1911, and a Subsidiary District of the
City of Cartsbad, referred to as (“CMWD”), and Kimley-Horn and Associates,
a North Carolina Corporation, (“Contractor”) (collectively, the “Parties”).
RECITALS
A. On May 21, 2001, the Parties executed Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement
to provide additional testing of cultural resource sites; and
B. On July 30, 2001, the Parties executed Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement
to provide additional traffic model and trip assignment analysis; and
C. The Parties desire to extend the Agreement for a period of one year; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, CMWD and Contractor agree as follows:
1. The Agreement, as may have been amended from time to time, is hereby
extended for a period of one (1) year ending on November 4,2002.
2. All other provisions of the Agreement, as may have been amended from
time to time, shall remain in full force and effect.
3. All requisite insurance policies to be maintained by the Contractor
pursuant to the Agreement, as may have been amended from time to time, shall include
coverage for this Amendment.
1
General, Counsel Approved Version #07.05.01
4. The individuals executing this Amendment and the instruments referenced on behalf of Contractor each represent and warrant that they have the legal power, right and actual authority to bind Contractor to the terms and conditions hereof of this Amendment.
CONTRACTOR
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, a North Carolina corporation
*By: 4JJ A-.
(sign here)
P&d ‘%wns~7q I/ y,ce prcs tdpn A
(print name/title)
L
ne,,,< x (print?ame/title) J,.., / ,A-sG~>l t I#( ‘4 L /
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the State of California
By:
City Manager or Mayor
LOf?RAINE M. WOOD City Clerk
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT a t Public oroanizdunder the Municip
designee
Secretary
If required by CMWD, proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by contractor must be attached. If Corooration, Agreement must be signed by one corporate officer from each of the following two groups.
*Group A. “Group B. Chairman, Secretary,
President, or Assistant Secretary, Vice-President CFO or Assistant Treasurer
Otherwise, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering the officer(s) signing to bind the corporation.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RONALD R. BALL, General Counsel
. By: &,&A J@. &‘,&fm Deputy General Counsel
2
General Counsel Approved Version #07.05.01
State of
personally appeared 1
factory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
executed the instrument.
OPTIONAL
Signature of Notaty Public
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons retying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer’s Name:
Cl Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
0 Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
tl Guardian or Conservator
q Other: TOD of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
Signer’s Name:
Cl Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
0 Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
Cl Other:
Signer Is Representing:
0 1995 National Notary Association - 6236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7164. Canoga Park, CA 91309.7164 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-600-676-6627
CALIFORNIA ALLPURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
.
State of Cc??\ & \ by&l s
County of \ QC\ r.
Onu Date . personally appeared I
. , Name and Title of Officer (e.g., “Jane Doe, Notaty Public”)
\ (> FQ c\ sac\_ t Name(s) of Signer(s)
0 personally known to me - OR - fl proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and o
Signhhre of f%tary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer’s Name: Signer’s Name:
0 Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
C Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
0 Attornev-in-Fact
0 Trustee-
0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
Signer Is Representing:
0 Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
0 Partner - II Limited 0 General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
Signer Is Representing:
I I
0 1995 National Notary Association - 6236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 913Og.71~ Prod. NO. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-600-676-6627
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR
FARADAY AVENUE ROAD EXTENSION FROM ORION WAY TO
MELROSE DRIVE SURVEY, MAPPING AND DESIGN SERVICES
(KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES)
This Amendment is entered into and effective as of the 30 dL day of
amending the agreement dated May 8, 2000, by and
between the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation, (“City”), the Carlsbad Municipal Water
District, a Public Agency organized under the Municipal Water Act of 191 I, and a Subsidiary
District of the City of Carlsbad, (“District”), and Kimley-Horn and Associates, a North Carolina
corporation, (“Contractor”) to provide environmental and civil engineering services for
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and preliminary and final engineering.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the initial agreement, dated May 8, 2000, identified a scope of work
which included summarizing traffic analysis as completed by others; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this aforementioned agreement desire to alter the
scope of work as follows: Add limited traffic model analysis and trip assignment in support of the
preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, as detailed on attached Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, a supplemental scope of work and fee schedule have been
negotiated and agreed to between the parties hereto, and shown on Exhibit “A” Scope of
Services and Fee;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the City, the District and Contractor agree as follows:
1. Contractor shall provide services as outlined on the attached Exhibit “A”.
2. City/District shall pay Contractor for all work associated with Paragraph 1
above, on a time and materials basis not-to-exceed $2,500. Contractor shall provide City/District
on a monthly basis, copies of invoices sufficiently detailed to include hours performed, hourly
rates, and related activities and costs for approval by City/District.
Revised: 7/25/00
3. Contractor shall complete all work outlined on the attached Exhibit “A” by
September 28,2001, or by the expiration of the agreement amended hereby.
4. All other provisions of the aforementioned agreement entered into on
May 8, 2000, by and between City, District and Contractor shall remain in full force and effect.
5. All requisite insurance policies to be maintained by the Contractor shall
include coverage for the amended assignment and scope of work.
Acknowledged and Accepted:
CONTRACTOR:
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., a North Caroliw corporation
By: (sign here) \ /
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal CorporaJion of the of California
By: Mgyor or City Manager
&l/if2 5 r@llbrl /ilG~ @&lolr/l f
(print name/title)
iy::
03Pr?kr5 3 Le, -1 J /&Zl 2)& h/*b- (print name/title) /
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, a Public Agency organized under the Municipal Water Act of 1911, and a Subsidiary District of the
AREST: A
’
(Proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by must be attached.)
(President or vice-president and secretary or assistant secretary must sign for corporations. If only one officer signs, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering that officer to bind the corporation.)
(If signed by an individual partner, the partnership must attach a statement of partnership authorizing the partner to execute this instrument.)
Deputy General Counsel
Revised: 7/25/00
06/26/01 14:46 FAX 6192349433
Junes26.2001
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOC @loo2
-lsh-l~ti\ P
Marshall Plants
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avtnuc
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Contract Amendment No. 2; Faraday Avenue EIB Development 095272005
Dear Marshall:
As WC discussed last week, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. will provide peak hour
intersection capacity analysis at selected locations to identify the impacts of the ‘Wo El
Pucrtc” scenario under Year 2005 conditions. Our fee for providing these services will be
$2,500. The scope of services is summarized below:
. Review the copy of the selected run provided by RBF. Identify the alternative routes
LO be taken by C&bad Oaks North and background traffic should El Fucrte not be constnlcted.
. assign the divened traffic to the following intersections (under Year 2005
conditions).
- El Camino ReaUFaraday Avenue
- El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road
- Melrose DrivcIFaraday Avenue
- Melrose DriveIPalomar Airport Road
- Business Park Drive/Park Ccnter Drive
- Business Park Drive/San Marcos Boulevard
. Tabulate the results and identify the significance of the traffic impacts due to the
diversion.
m Summariu: the findings in a brief letter rcpcrt with exhibits.
\V~RnVOLI\PDRIVnP~O~~~~5O.s\09
w
TEL 616 234 9411
FAX 619 234 9433
n
Suite 301 517 Fourrh Avenue
SanOii,Wifomla
92101
G rU?rA-m w
State of
County of ,C 0 A
On
Name and Title of Officer (e.g., “Jane Doe, Notary Public”)
personally appeared
Name(s) dSignet(s)
0 personally known to me - OR - @ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: Number of Pages: 3
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer’s Name:
Cl Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
q Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Top of thumb here
Signer’s Name:
0 Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
0 Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Top of thumb here
0 1995 National Notary Association * 6236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7164 - Canoga Park, CA 91309-7164 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-600-676-6627
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR
FARADAY AVENUE ROAD EXTENSION FROM ORION WAY TO
MELROSE DRIVE SURVEY, MAPPING AND DESIGN SERVICES
This Amendment is entered into and effective as of the 21st day of
May I 2001 amending the agreement dated May 8, 2000, by and
between the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation, (“City”), the Carlsbad Municipal Water
District, a Public Agency organized under the Municipal Water Act of 1911, and a Subsidiary
District of the City of Carlsbad, (“District”), and Kimley-Horn and Associates, a North Carolina -c-
corporation, (“Contractor”) to provide environmental and civil engineering services for
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and preliminary and final engineering.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the initial agreement, dated May 8, 2000, identified a scope of work which
included the testing of cultural resource sites up to a $10,000 dollar task budget; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this aforementioned agreement desire to alter the scope of
work as follows: Add additional testing of cultural resource sites in support of the preparation of
the Environmental Impact Report, as detailed on attached Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, a supplemental scope of work and fee schedule have been negotiated and
agreed to between the parties hereto, and shown on Exhibit “A” Scope of Services and Fee;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the City, the District and Contractor agree as follows:
1. Contractor shall provide services as outlined on the attached Exhibit “A”.
2. City/District shall pay Contractor for all work associated with Paragraph 1
above, on a time and materials basis not-to-exceed $35,610. Contractor shall provide
City/District on a monthly basis, copies of invoices sufficiently detailed to include hours
performed, hourly rates, and related activities and costs for approval by City/District.
7/25/00
3. Contractor shall complete all work outlined on the attached Exhibit “A” by
November 5, 2001, or by the expiration of the agreement amended hereby.
4. All other provisions of the aforementioned agreement entered into on
May 8, 2000, by and between City, District and Contractor shall remain in full force and effect.
5. All requisite insurance policies to be maintained by the Contractor shall
include coverage for the amended assignment and scope of work.
Acknowledged and Accepted:
CONTRACTOR:
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
(sign here) ATTEST:
Al-TEST: Al-TEST:
Adi/
(Proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by must be attached.)
(President or vice-president and secretary or assistant secretary must sign for corporations. If only one officer signs, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering that officer to bind the corporation.)
(If signed by an individual partner, the partnership must attach a statement of partnership authorizing the partner to execute this instrument.)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
7/25/00
February 1,200 1
Marshall Plantz
City of Carlsbad
163 5 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Contract Amendment No. 1; Faraday Avenue Projects 095272000
Dear Mr. Plantz:
Cotton Bridges Associates informed us that the archaeologist, Brian Smith and
Associates would need additional compensation for additional testing, laboratory
analysis and report preparation for eleven different cultural resource sites. Please see
the attached letter detailing the request. Our fee for providing these services will be
$35,610. The following table lists the cost for each site needing further testing.
\\PADRE\VOLI\P-DRIVE\PROJECTS\095250.sX)
n
Suite 301
517 FourthAvenue
San Diego, California
92101
n
TEL 619 234 9411
FAX 619 234 9433
Mr. Marshall Plan& February 1,2OOl, Page 2
Please have authorized persons execute both copies of this letter in the spaces
provided below, retain one copy and return the other to me. This letter when signed
by both parties constitutes an amendment and supplement to the Contract. Please
notify me in writing immediately if this letter is not in accordance with your
instructions.
Very truly yours,
mDz7777.
Dennis J. Landaal, P.E.
Project Manager
II”. 111 r .LIJ
COTTON/BRIDGES/ASSOCIATES, INC.
URBAN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
Jarmary 25,200l
Dennis Landaal, P.E. EGmley-Horn and Assooiates, Inc. 5 17 Fourth Avenue Suite 301 San Diego, CA 92101
Subject: Faraday Avenue Cultural Resources Scope Adjustment
Dear Dennis:
Pursuant to discussions with you and City staff, Brian F. Smith and Associates (BSA) has conducted aliter&u.rereviewandsurveyworkfortheFaradayAvenue, AguaHedionaSewerandTchang Specific Plan project, Through this initial work effort, BSA has identified 17 cultnrs.l resource sites within the area of potential effect (APE) ofthe project that will require additional testitqg laboratory analysis, and report preparation.
Our original scope of work and budget allocated a limited amount ($10,000) for cultural resources testing. Ourswperecognized~atthelevelofeffortassociatedsrithanyte~gcouldnotbed~~ined until the Phase I work vvas completed (the records search and survey) at which time the number and extentofsitewouldbeknown. Thaoriginal$l0,000alIocated~te~gwillpartiallycbverthetesting needed, however, additional funds will be needed to complete the testing in accordance with City of Carlsbad Cultural Resources Guidelines and the CEQA Guidelines. BSA has prepared a Testing Cost Proposal for each of the I7 cultural sites (attached). We have reviewed the locations of the sites and will be abIe to eliminate approximately 6 ofthe sites as they will not be impacted by the project. Testing will be required for the remaining 11 sites. The attached table Micxbs the cites and the cost associated with each site.
At this time an amendment of $24,695 for BSA and $4,950 fix CBA is requested to address the
additional cultural resources sites (total amount of % 29,645). This amount is in additionto the $10,000 previously allocated for testing. Please also note, as stated within ESA’s Testing Cost Proposal, any additional work necessary resulting from a discovery of human remains would be an additional cost.
Please give me a call if you have any questions regarding the proposed scope and budger amendment.
Senior Assooiate
W1165.00
747 MST GREEN STREl$ SUITE 300 * PASADENA, CA 91101-2119 (626) 304-0102 . FAX (626) 3@0402 . E-MAIL &@pacbell.net
6336 GREENWICH DRIVE, SUITE F . SAN DIEGO, CA 9212’2-5922
(658) 625-ODS6 h FAX (&XI) 6250545 l E-MAIL cbasd@pacbell.net
720 SUNRISE AVENUE, SUITE 202-C . ROSEVILLE, CA 956614509 (916) 780-9390 l FAX (916) 760-9386 . E-MAIL cbzac@Jps.net
4II.I.L4.CU”A J-L&r,, L” , I “I 1, W.*“ULJ* “J3”L. IYU. 111 I-.a/3
Summary of Impacted Sites Required to be Tested for Siicance
AU of the sites idenllfied in the table below will be impacted by the proposed project. Cuhral
sites within the study area, but not impacted by the project are not listed in the table.
Site Temp 1 $5,690
Site Temp 2 $3,850
Site Temp 3 z&700
‘Site Temp 4 $3900
Site Temp 7 $1,525
SDI-2714 $150
SDI-2722 Slj75
WI-2776 $7Z5
SD14229 I $l50
SDI-5230
SDI-523 1
.’
TOTAL’COST for SITE TESTING
Iless S; 10,000 previously allocated for testing
TOTAL
$2,600
$5,930
$34,695
(~10,000)
!ii24,69S
7
BRIANF.S~ANDASS~~A~
ARCHAEQLOCiltXL/-TO RIUL/PAIEOBHQLOGK/UCONSUL~G 1467~lmmmvnT,sAlIPIOQD,txwOUIU 92129 12528lclmuMcolRa,svrrs3,mwAY,tcuw~ 92064 RIoraaM151)4649615: F~~r(LIS0)1U6423
November 14,2ooO
Tim Gnibus CottonBeland Associates !X+XG~ (F3reenwich Drive
San Diego, California 92122
RJZ: Faraday Avenue / Agua Hedionda Sewer Revised Testing Cost Proposal
Dear Tim:
As authorized by Cotton/Beland Associates, we initiated the testing of HOW prehistoric Sita loc*d along the Faraday Avenue/Agua Hedionda Sewer Project in October. Three of these sites have been found to be much larger and contain more extensive artifact collections than anticipated, based on the’information provided in the site record forms. A primary consideration to the testing conducted was the dense ground cover that has prevented accurate visual appraisal of the potential of the sites based on surface evidence. Given the existing condition of the dense vegetation ground cover in areas where important sires are resent, I have revisited the recorded sites to reassess the scope of work needed to accurately test tl: e sites and conduct the impact analysis.
The four sites tested include Temp 1, SDI-2722, SDI-2776, and SDI-523 1. In general, we have encountered dense vegetation which has masked much of the sites, and upon clearing and close inspection, the size and complexity of the cultural resources has been found to be much greater than related on the site registration forms. In particular, Site SDI-5231 was previously tested in the mid 197Os, but our field testing has determined that the previous testing missed much of the eastern half of the archaeological site, and failed to actually delineate the boundaries of tie deposit or locate the areas with the greatest research potential. Our initial work proposed updating the testing program with 20 shovel tests and rwo test units; however, to actually complete the delineation work, 36 shovel tests were needed, and 41 surface collections were mapped.
At Site SDI-2776, the site form suggested that the site had been destroyed by grading and only a few shell fiagtnents remain; however, upon initiation of detailed work, we encountered a very dense shell and artifact scatter with an extensive subsurface deposit hidden in the dense coastal sage scrub growth that lies north of creek area. The level of effort needed to adequately test SDI- 2776 was much greater than anticipated or budgeted.
At Site Temp 1, our initial survey identified the site; however the unexpected aspect of this site was that the disturbance related to past agricultural use masked ami buried portions of this site. Testing remled a much larger surface and subsurface component to the site requiring 3 1 shovel tests (15 were estimated in our scope of work) and resulting in 71 surface recovery locations.
As a result of this survey, seven archaeological sites and six archaeological isolates were identified, eight previously recorded archaeological sites were relocated or attempted to be relocated, and two historic structures were relocated. Of the newly identified sites, six are prehistoric and one is historic. All the isolates identified are prehistoric. Brief descriptions of the 15 archaeological sites, two historic structures, and six isolates are provided below. In order to complete the impact
November 1% 2OM- hian F. Smith ad h.soci&~ - Rzgv 2
analysis of the proposed road and sewer line construction, as well as analyse the Tchang.Property, additional archaeological investigations will be required to determine site significance and evaluate potential impacts. The scope of work for the-site testing program is provided in the following section and is surnmarized in Table 1.
St i e Descri ‘o
Site TemD 1 This site is identified as a large, sparse to moderately dense prehistoric lithic scatter consisting of at least 200 flakes, several ceramic potsherds, and marine shell. The site is located partially within the sewer alignment and partially within the road and development area for the Tchang property. Testing of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts, and the excavation of 3 1 shovel tests and three test units co delineate and evaluate the subsurface deposit identified. This site has a medium likelihood of a subsurface deposit.
rnD 2 This site is identified as a large, sparse prehistoric lithic scatter consisting of at least one mano and 40 flakes, with a small quantity of marine shell also present. The site is located within the Tchang property. Testing of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts, and the excavation of 25 shovel tests and one test unit to delineate and evaluate any subsurface deposit identified. This site has a moderate subsMace potential.
This site is identified as a sparse lithic scatter consisting of at least 25 flakes and some marine shell. The site is located wi@n the Tchang property. Testing of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts, and the excavation of 15 shovel tests and one test unit to delineate and evaluate any subsurface deposit identified. This site has a low likelihood of a subsurface deposit.
site TemD 4 This site is identified as a sparse prehistoric lithic scatter consisting of at least six hammerstones, one mano, and 40 flakes. The site is situated in the central area of the Tchang property. Testing of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts, and the excavation of 25 shovel tests and two test units to delineate and evaluate any subsurface deposit identified. This site has a moderate subsurface potential.
This site is identified as a sparse lithic scatter consisting of less than ten flakes, one scraper, and marine shell. The site is located along the sewer alignment west of the Tchang property. Testing of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts, and the excavation of 20 shovel tests and one test unit to delineate and evaluate any subsurface deposit identified. This site has a low likelihood for the presence of a subsurface deposit.
This site is identified as a possibly historic rock and concrete dam on a tributary of Agua Hedionda Creek with a pipe built into the dam creating a small cascade, The site is located in the northwest comer of the Tchang property. Likelihood of an adjacent historic deposit appears very low and therefore photographing and recording the feature will suffice to document the darn.
November 14.2000 - Brian F. Smith and Asrodatcs - Page 3
Site Temp 7 This site is identified as a possible prehistoric feature consisting of a mano and metate found together partially buried. The artifacts are located on the Tchang property. Although no other artifacts were found associated with the mano and metate, because they appear to be a feature testing is recommended. Testing should consist of collection of the two artifacts and the excavation of three to five shovel tests and a test unit if a subsurface deposit is identified. Due to the location of the site and the partially buried nature of the artifacts, likelihood of a subsurface deposit is low to moderate.
Site SDI-2 714
This site is identified in records as a bedrock milling station and lithic scatter. The site is located within 50 feet of the sewer alignment in the southern area of the project. The site was posthole tested in the 1970’s and ar that time no subsurface deposit was identified During this survey, the milling was not relocated and only two flakes were observed in the site vicinity. Because of the negative results of the previous testing and the inability to locate the milling, no testing is recommended for this site.
Site SDI-2 722
This site is identified in records as a lithic and ceramic scatter with a possible rock shelter. The rock shelter was not relocated and a cluster of large boulders in the site vicinity appears to have been pushed there, possibly as a result of agricultural activities in the past. The site is located within the alignment of Faraday Avenue. Five flakes were found in the site vicinity and although the records do not explicitly state that the site has been previously rested, it may be speculated that this site was previously tested because this site was recorded by Can-ice in 1973 and the other sites recorded during that survey were tested. Due to the paucity of artifacts, the disturbed nature of the site, and the likelihood that the site was previously tested, only a limited testing effort is necessary to confirm the status of the site. The testing effort should include five shovel tests, one test unit, and the collection of surface artifacts.
This site is not identified in the records obtained other than locational data. The landform mapped was relocated, and the site was found to contain a significant quantity of artifacts, including pottery, flakes, stone tools, and hundreds of marine shell fragments. This site is located on the south side of the Tchang development area within the alignment for Faraday Avenue and the sewer line. The site is much larger then mapped in the site record forms, encompassing an area of approximately 650 feet (northeast to southwest) and 400 feet from no&west to southeast, and sits on a long, sloping terrace adjacent to the txek. Testing of the site will be necessary to evaluate the site, and should include 40 shovel tests and 4 test units. All surface artifacts discovered should he mapped and collected.
m 7 This site is identified in records as consisting of two large milling slicks located on granite outcrops 75 feet apart, with a single lithic tool found in disturbed soil between the outcrops. The site was purported to be on the boundary of the project area. This site was not relocated and appears to have been destroyed during the construction of a parking lot located between the Carlsbad Skate Park and a police station. No testing is recommended.
Site SDf-5118 This site is identified in records as consisting of a single bedrock milling slick located on a large granite outcrop near the boundary of the project area. Although many bedrock outcrops wete observed, the grinding slick was not relocated. The site may be located outside the project area and
.-.-w - . ,_-.. --- -.
Novcmbw 14,200o - B&n F. Smith md Assockatrs - Page 4
there is evidence that some bedrock outcrops have been pushed into a drainage. Because the site appears to be outside the project area and/or destroyed, no testing is recommended.
5229 This site is identified in records by Charles Bull in 1977 as a lithic scatter with “no evidence of a subsurface component.” This site w-as not relocated during our study, and there is a possibility that the site has been previously tested and surface collected. No additional work is recommended at the site, although further research will be conducted to search for any prior testing information.
Site SDI-5230 This site is identified in records as a large sparse lithic scatter with marine shell present. The site is located in the southwest area of the Tchang property. The site was posthole tested in 1973 and determined to have a subsurface deposit present to as deep as 36” in one area. A testing program is needed at this site to determine the dimensions of the subsurface deposit and evaluate the potential of the contents of the site. The testing program should include 25 shovel tests and two test units, and all surface artifacts will be mapped and collected.
Site SD&5-l 14.063 ;
This site has been independently identifi@ by different researchers and given two site numbers. Both numbers share locational data and site characteristics and will be treated as one site in this letter. The site is located in the western alignment of Faraday Avenue and also is within the alignment of the sewer. The site is identified as a habitation site which has been previously tested including a surface collection and the excavation of two trenches and three test units. The site is reported to have a depth of 40 centimeters. Portions of Site SDI-523 VSDI-14,063 were tested in the 1970s; however the scope and results of that testing have not yet been obtained. Because of the record information which suggests that this site may be important, an updated testing effort is recommended to delineate any subsurface deposits and evaluate the significance of the site. Testing of this site would be accomplished through the excavation of 36 shovel tests and two test units, plus the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts.
241 This historic structure was relocated and is still standing. The structure has been adequately recorded by previous researchers. No additional work is necessary.
This historic StrucNre was relocated and is still standing. The structure has been adequately recorded by previous rescarchers. No additional work is necessary.
The isolates need no additional work but descriptions are presented to provide additional information about the nature of artifacts in the project area.
A heavily-used two-sided granite mano.
isolate A retouched metavolcanic flake.
late 3 A granite mano and a metavolcanic flake.
Isolate 4 A granite mano.
November 14,200O - Brian F. Smit?J~ nnd Ilsrociatee - Pap 5
A multiply-retouched metavolcanic flake.
lute 6
A cobble scraper and a marine shell fragment.
Sk.T?MI?..?
..Sjte..Te~P 2
Site Temp 3 . . . . .
..sICCc..Tw!P 4 ..,...
.,5&e Tew 5,.
Site Temp 6 .,... ,,... ...,,
Site Temp 7 . . . . . .
Site SDI-27 14 . . .
site wI-2722 . ..,...
Site ,S,DI-2776
Site SD131 17
Site SD!-51 18 .
Site SDI-5229 I..... . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Site SDI-5230 ..,.,., ,,,.,,
.si.te sw231
.W7??w!?..
P-37-018242
Yes Yes ..,..... . . . . ,, ..I ,,.. I,. . 31 .,,., ,.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Yes Yes 25 . . . . . . . . . . . .
YeS ,...,.,....,,,,.,,, u-.. ..,..,... .,. .!.? . ,.
YeS Yes 25 ,.. . . . .
y= x! . . ,. ,I .xes . . . . . . . ..,...,
,,,....,..,., Y= ..,.....,.,..., Yes ..,.,......,......, 0
Yes . . .I.!%. . . . . . . . 5. .
U~wb. . . . . . . ., ., ., . . . . . . . ,....... Unlikely ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0, .
YeY YeS 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I....,
YeS 40 .,,, . . . . . . . . .Y- . . . .
Vnlikh ,.., . ,UaliW, ,. . ,O
Unlikely . . . . . . . . . . . Unlikely ,....__..,,,_.................. . .O.. .,
NO No 0 . . . . . . . . . . ,.... . . . . . . . . .._............. . .
Yes Yes 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Yes YeS 36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,...,.....,..,.., ,, ,.,
No No . . ?
No No 0
The scope! of work will be accomplished by implementing the following methodology. The methodology to be used will conform to the City of Carlsbad archaeological guidelines. The testing program will include the following specific tests:
(1) All surface artifacts or other features will be mapped. Surface artifacts will be collected by provenience location and returned to our laboratory for cataloging.
(2) A series of shovel tests will be used to define the boundaries and depths of the prehistoric deposits. Each shovel test will measure 30 centimeters in diameter and will be excavated in lo-centimeter levels until a non-cultural level is encountered. All soil from each shovel test will be sifted through 118tbinch screen to recover artifacts. The quantity of shovel tests at each site is dependent upon the size and potential of the site.
(3) For each of the sites that will require shovel tests, test unit excavations may also be required. These test units each measure one meter square, and will also be excavated in IO-centimeter levels until a non-cultural level is encountered. All soil from each test unit will be sifted through 1/8th-inch screen to recover artifacts.
Novmebcr 14,2OW - Blim F. Smith and ~osocirtis - Puge 6
(4) AU collected materials must bc washed, identified, cataloged, and properly stored. Some materials may require special analysis, such as bone (faunal) material, which would be analyzed by our faunal expert to identify the types of animals that were being used for food sources at the sites. Eventually, the artifacts must be submitted for permanent cur&ion at the San Diego Archaeological Center.
The archaeological test of the prehistoric archaeological sites will identify the boundaries as well as the artifact content of each site. The testing effort is intended to locate, sample, and record any
deposits of artifacts and/or features related to the prehistoric use of the sites. All collected materials must be caraloged and subjected to laboratory analysis. The field and laboratory information will provide the foundation for the significance evaluation of each archaeological site. Finally, the appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) fotms must be completed for each resource in order to formally record or update the sites at the South Coastal Information Center at San Diego State University. A report of findings must be prepared according to City Guidelines which will detail all the forgoing work and discuss the significance evaluation of cultural resources on the property. The report will inciude specific tech.nical content, and appropriate graphics and maps. In the event that archaeological resources existing on the property are found to be significant, potential impacts associated with the project would need to be addressed and measures to mitigate impacts identified.
Prooosalfor sz 6 Fw&Qrrons .y .
This proposal will provide a revised fee for the archaeological excavation, laboratory analysis of archaeological materials, and a report of findings. This study will encompass the types of information normally required for such projects and cultural resources present on the property- The fees for the individual sites correspond to the level of effort listed in Table 1. The cc@s to complete the necessary level of effort at each site are provided in Table 2. The fee to conduct the surface collection and mapping, as well as the recording of any features, is an estimate based on man hours needed to accomplish the tasks, which varies greatly between the different sites.
Based on the initial testing of the first four sites and a closer inspection of previously recorded sites, the following revised cost proposal should more accurately define the perimeters of the testing program. Another major problem that has been encountered is access to the sites with testing equipment. Many sites, especially in the Tchang portion and the northwestern segments of the sewer alignment, are a long distance from the nearest road or access point, and all equipment
will need to the carried to the sites. equipment to the sites. In the case of some sites, an hour hike is needed to get Having a key to the gate on the east side of the property would helu to reduce the time to access the s~tcs.
The fees for subsurface testing are based generally on unit costs for shovel test ($70.00 to $120.00 per test) and test units ($400.00 to $700.00 estimate based upon our inference from the IT r unit). The fee for laboratory anaIysis is again an eld survey of the quantity of materials that may be
present in the subsurface testing. In the event that the test units produce a much larger quantity of cultural materials than expected, the laboratory costs would be increased,
Any meetings or public hearings which require my attendance will be billed on an hourly basis,.at a rate of $90.00 per hour, in addition to the testing fee listed above. The testing program can can be completed within four to five weeks following authorization to proceed. Should any resources be tested prove to need efforts that are beyond our estimate, I will notify you immediately. Also, I have not included any special studies in our fee estimate, because we do not know if, in fact, much
Nmmmbm 14.2ooO - Brian F, Smith and AmmCiatse - Page 7
in the way of s@ecial analyses will be required. I will inform you of any special analysis fees following the field work phase of work. All copy charges are reimbursable, and mileage is billed at $0.35 per mile.
The estimated budget for this testing program is based upon our best estimate of the level of effort that will be required. However, we will make every effon to reduce the amount of work needed 01: hopefully complete our tasks in less time than anticipated.
$1 ,qoo.oo
$4~.00 .,.
$400.00 .
$800.00 . . . . . . . . . . .
$450.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
x?4!?..
. . ..%4oo.oq
w.m
s-vx!,,..
..%US!!X.
w4?!!. . .
so.00 ,(,
.w:.E..
s!*~w..
..s!,Pw~oo, .
w?!?. ,,..
so.00
$6,325.00
. . se?:w. . . . . . F?O-@J . . . ..s! ,!7c!!..,
,, s950.00 ,, ,.,...,..,...,.... ,_.. ..mwx?... .., . 57,225!!?!? .
. . woo ,,. ,.,,,, .?!E?.Y ,.. s!so,w
. . so.00 ,, wo:K? . . . 3!%?!!..
$0.00 $150.00 ,.,..,..,, .,..,.,,.......... s150.00 ,,, . . . .
w!?.~ f450-00 ., . ww.~ ' ,,...... .,......, I...
57oo:w ,.... wo&!!? . s~.mw!? . .
$0.00 5150.00 $25000 . . . . . . . . . . ,... .,, . . . . ..a ,.,. ,.. ,, ., ;, ,,. ,, ,.
$0.00 $150.00 s250.00
s5,300.00 $5,650.00 $38.670.00
The potential does exist that, given the size and intensity of the prehistoric use of the propetty, human remains may be discovered during our work. Any additional work necessary resulting from such a discovery would be in addition to our budget estimate, In the event that the City requests various revisions to the report or additional field work, this request would be the source for a contract addendum.
.- --
November 14,2000- Briam F. Smifh ad Aa~ocdatee -Page 8
At the completion of our field work, I will plan to meet with the project engineer and yourself or other representatives, to discuss our findings and make recommendations regarding the proposed projects and any significant sites. Our report will provide mitigation measures to resolve any problems between the planned uses and significant archaeological sites.
We can begin this project at any time. If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely, 4&z- BFS:ks’
State of ccJ,qocv\;cL .
County of ka CT \
On fi*,,\. \\ , dot? \
u
before me, Das Name and Title of Ofhcer (e.g., ‘Jane Doe, Notary Public”) .
personally appeared A,;& Kc--& $ye-y*,y
Name(s) of Signer(s)
0 personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of w ’ h the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and
diic
cial s .
z--
Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer’s Name: Signer’s Name:
0 Individual 0 Individual
0 Corporate Officer 0 Corporate Officer
Title(s): Title(s):
0 Partner - 0 Limited 0 General Cl Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
0 Attorney-in-Fact 0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
I7 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing:
0 lR95 Natlonal Notary Assocatlon * 6236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7164 * Canoga Park, CA 91309-7164 Prod. NO. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-600-676-60
State of oc,\&v\(a~
I
county of \QC\cl u
\\ q a001 before me,sp(C 0 I Date 1 Name and Title of Officer (e.g., “Jane Doe, Notary Public”) 7
personally appeared clc\t r , Name(s) of Signer(s)
17 personally known to me - OR - q proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
WIG N. CHRISMNSEN CommInlQn # 1277134
Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer’s Name: Signer’s Name:
Cl Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
0 Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
Signer Is Representing:
I I I I
0 Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
0 Partner - 0 Limited U General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
q Other:
Signer Is Representing: I I I I
0 1995 National Notary Association * 6236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7164 l Canoga Park, CA 91309-7164 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-600-676-6627
w
May 8,2000
James M. Roberts
Senior Vice President
517 Fourth Ave., Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92101
RE: AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING
SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPOR'
AND PRELIMINARY AND FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR FARADAY
AVENUE ROAD EXTENSION FROM ORION WAY TO MELROSE DRIVE
At the meeting of May 2,2000, the Carlsbad City Council adopted Resolution No. 2000-137 anc
Carlsbad Municipal Water District adopted resolution No. 1083, approving the above referenced
agreement.
Enclosed for your record are copies of Resolution No.'s 2000-137 and 1083, as well as a hlly
executed agreement for your files.
If you have questions concerning the contract, please contact William E. Plummer, P.E., at 602-
2768.
5°K 00 Sincerely, /&e* poLc M? & ~*e++i&edo
a fldK yc' Ai Dee Ulrich
Office of the Carlsbad City Clerk
Enclosures (3)
m
Icl;;n/e)/-Aenl P' #&d;L/a
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive - Carisbad, CA 92008-1989 - (760) 434-28
U i f W w
AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND
CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PREPAMTION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PRELIMINARY AND FINAL
ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR FARADAY AVENUE ROAD EXTENSION
FROM ORION WAY TO MELROSE DRIVE
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the sk day
, 2000, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municiF
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATE
DISTRICT, a Public Agency organized under the Municipal Water Act of I91 1 , and
Subsidiary District of the City of Carlsbad hereinafter referred to as "District", ai
Kimley-Horn and Associates, a North Carolina Corporation hereinafter referred to
"Contractor."
I U
RECITALS
City requires the services of an Environmental and Professional Engineerii
services Contractor to provide the necessary environmental and civil engineerii
services for preparation of an environmental impact report and preliminary and fir
engineering design for Faraday Avenue Road Extension from Orion Way to Melro
Drive and the environmental impact report and preliminary engineering design for tl
South Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer Reaches SAHTIA, SAHTI B, SAHTI C, ai
SAHTID; District requires the services of an Environmental and Civil Engineerii
Design Contractor to provide the necessary professional environmental and ci
engineering design services for preparation of an environmental impact report a1
preliminary and final design services for Faraday Avenue 16-Inch potable and 8-In
recycled water pipelines; and Contractor possesses the necessary skills a
qualifications to provide the services required by the City and the District;
1 rev. 2/1511
c f w w
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenar
contained herein, City, District and Contractor agree as follows:
1. CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATIONS
Refer to Exhibit "A attached hereto and made part hereof
2. CITY and DISTRICT OBLIGATIONS
The City and District shall provide reports and supplemental informati
available to the City or District for use in completing the contract scope of work.
3. PROGRESS AND COMPLETION
The work under this contract will begin within ten (IO) days after receipt
notification to proceed by the City Engineer or designee and be completed within fi1
hundred forty five (545) calendar days of that date. Extensions of time may be grantt
if requested by the Contractor and agreed to in writing by the City Engineer
designee. The City Engineer or designee will give allowance for documented ai
substantiated unforeseeable and unavoidable delays not caused by a lack of foresig
on the part of the Contractor, or delays caused by City or District inaction or 0th
agencies' lack of timely action.
4. FEES TO BE PAID TO CONTRACTOR
The total fee payable for the Preliminary Engineering and Environment
Documentation services to be performed shall not exceed nine hundred sixty thousan
six hundred seventy two, ($960,672) dollars. The total fee payable for the Final Desic
shall not exceed five hundred ninety one thousand, eight hundred nineteen, ($591,81'
dollars. No other compensation for services will be allowed except those items coverc
by supplemental agreements per Paragraph 8, "Changes in Work." The City resew
2 rev. 2/15/(
r r w w
the right to withhold a ten percent (10%) retention until the project has been accept1
by the City and the District.
Incremental payments, if applicable, should be made as outlined in attach1
Exhibit "A."
5. DURATION OF CONTRACT
This agreement shall extend for a period of 18 months from date thereof. T
contract may be extended by the City ManagedExecutive Manager for One additior
one (1) year period or part thereof, based upon a review of satisfactory performan
and the City's and the District's needs. The parties shall prepare extensions in writit
indicating effective date and length of the extended contract.
6. PAYMENT OF FEES
Payment of approved items on the invoice shall be mailed to the Contract
within 30 days of receipt of the invoice.
7. FINAL SUBMISSIONS
Within 10 working days of completion and approval of the Final Constructic
Drawings the Contractor shall deliver to the City the following items:
0 All deliverable items as noted in the Scope of Work attached as Exhibit "A".
0 One set of signed and sealed Construction documents ready for reproduction
advertise and award the construction project.
8. CHANGES IN WORK
If, in the course of the contract, changes seem merited by the Contractor, tt
City or the District, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that
change in the conditions of the contract is warranted, the Contractor, the City or tt
District may request a change in contract. Such changes shall be processed by tt
3 rev. 2/15/(
r I w w
City in the following manner: A letter outlining the required changes shall be forward(
to the City/District by Contractor to inform them of the proposed changes along with
statement of estimated changes in charges or time schedule. A Standard Amendme
to Agreement shall be prepared by the City and the District and approved by the C
and the District according to the procedures described in Carlsbad Municipal COC
Section 3.28.1 72.
invalidate unaffected portions of the agreement.
9. COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
Such Amendment to Agreement shall not render ineffective
The Contractor warrants that their firm has not employed or retained ai
company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Contractor,
solicit or secure this agreement, and that Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay ar
company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commissio
percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon, or resultir
from, the award or making of this agreement. For breach or violation of this warrant
the City or the District shall have the right to annul this agreement without liability, or,
its discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or consideration, or otherwi:
recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fees, gift, 1
contingent fee.
10. NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE
The Contractor shall comply with the state and federal laws regardin
nondiscrimination.
4 rev. 2/15/C
I r w w
11. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
In the event of the Contractor's failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the wo
as provided for in this contract, the City ManagerIExecutive Manager may terminate tt
contract for nonperformance by notifying the Contractor by certified mail of tl
termination of the Contractor. The Contractor, thereupon, has five (5) working days
deliver said documents owned by the City and the District and all work in progress
the Deputy City Engineer. The Deputy City Engineer, shall make a determination
fact based upon the documents delivered to City of the percentage of work which tl
Contractor has performed which is usable and of worth to the City in having the contrz
completed. Based upon that finding as reported to the City Manager, the Manager sh
determine the final payment of the contract.
This agreement may be terminated by either party upon tendering thirty (3
days written notice to the other party. In the event of such suspension or terminatic
upon request of the City or the District, the Contractor shall assemble the work prodL
and put same in order for proper filing and closing and deliver said product to City
the District. In the event of termination, the Contractor shall be paid for work performc
to the termination date; however, the total shall not exceed the fee payable und
paragraph 4. The City ManagerIExecutive Manager shall make the final determinatic
as to the portions of tasks completed and the compensation to be made.
12. CLAIMS AND LAWSUITS
The Contractor agrees that any contract claim submitted to the City or the Distr
must be asserted as part of the contract process as set forth in this agreement and r
in anticipation of litigation or in conjunction with litigation. The Contractor acknowledg
that if a false claim is submitted to the City or the District, it may be considered fral
5 rev. 211511
I * w w
and the Contractor may be subject to criminal prosecution. The Contrac
4 acknowledges that California Government Code sections 12650 et sea., the Fa1
Claims Act, provides for civil penalties where a person knowingly submits a false cla
to a public entity. These provisions include false claims made with deliberate ignoran
of the false information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of information,
the City of Carlsbad or the Carlsbad Municipal Water District seeks to recover penalti
pursuant to the False Claims Act, it is entitled to recover its litigation costs, includi
attorney's fees. The Contractor acknowledges that the filing of a false claim may subjt
the Contractor to an administrative debarment proceeding wherein the Contractor m,
be prevented to act as a Contractor on any public work or improvement for a period
up to five years. The Contractor acknowledges debarment by another jurisdiction
grounds for the City of Carlsbad or the Carlsbad Municipal Water District to disqual
the Contractor from the selection process. $fd (Initia
The provisions of Carlsbad Municipal Code sections 3.32.025, 3.32.02
3.32.027 and 3.32.028 pertaining to false claims are incorporated herein byxeference c /iV(/nitii
d 13. JURISDICTION
Contractor agrees and hereby stipulates that the proper venue and jurisdictic
for resolution of any disputes between the parties arising out of this agreement is Sz
Diego County, California.
14. STATUS OF THE CONTRACTOR
The Contractor shall perform the services provided for herein in Contractor's ow
way as an independent Contractor and in pursuit of Contractor's independent callin
and not as an employee of the City or the District. Contractor shall be under control
6 rev. 2/15/(
Y # - w
the City and the District only as to the result to be accomplished, but shall consult w
the City and the District as provided for in the request for proposal. The persons us(
by the Contractor to provide services under this agreement shall not be consider(
employees of the City or the District for any purposes whatsoever.
The Contractor is an independent Contractor of the City and the District. TI
payment made to the Contractor pursuant to the contract shall be the full and compk
compensation to which the Contractor is entitled. The City and the District shall r
make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of the Contractor or its employe
or subcontractors. The City and the District shall not be required to pay any worke
compensation insurance or unemployment contributions on behalf of the Contractor
its employees or subcontractors. The Contractor agrees to indemnify the City and tl
District within 30 days for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtir
payment, unemployment payment or workers' compensation payment which the C
and the District may be required to make on behalf of the Contractor or any employ
or subcontractor of the Contractor for work done under this agreement or su
indemnification amount may be deducted by the City and the District from any balan
owing to the Contractor.
The Contractor shall be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Refoi
and Control Act of 1986 and shall comply with those requirements, including, but r
limited to, verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employec
subcontractors and Consultants that are included in this agreement.
7 rev. 2/15/
? 1 w e
15. CONFORMITY TO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall cause all drawings and specifications to conform to
applicable requirements of law: federal, state and local. Contractor shall provide
necessary supporting documents, to be filed with any agencies whose approval
necessary.
The City or the District will provide copies of the approved plans to any 0th
agencies.
16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All plans, studies, sketches, drawings, reports, and specifications as her€
required are the property of the City and the District, whether the work for which thc
are made be executed or not. In the event this contract is terminated, all document
plans, specifications, drawings, reports, and studies shall be delivered forthwith to tt-
City or the District. Contractor shall have the right to make one (I) copy of the plans fc
its records.
17. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS
The Contractor agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the WOI
pursuant to this contract shall be vested in City and District and hereby agrees 1
relinquish all claims to such copyrights in favor of City and District.
18. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT
Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the “City” and the “Distric
and their officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all claim!
damages, losses and expenses including attorney fees arising out of the performanc
8 rev. 2/15/0
r I - w
of the work described herein caused in whole or in part by any willful misconduct
negligent act or omission of the Contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly
indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liab
19. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT
The Contractor shall not assign this contract or any part thereof or any moni
due thereunder without the prior written consent of the City and the District.
20. SUBCONTRACTING
If the Contractor shall subcontract any of the work to be performed under tl
contract by the Contractor, Contractor shall be fully responsible to the City and t
District for the acts and omissions of Contractor's subcontractor and of the perso
either directly or indirectly employed by the subcontractor, as Contractor is for the a(
and omissions of persons directly employed by Contractor. Nothing contained in tt
contract shall create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor
Contractor and the City or the District. The Contractor shall bind every subcontraci
and every subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this contract applicable
Contractor's work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the subcontract in questil
approved in writing by the City or the District.
21. PROHIBITED INTEREST
No official of the City or the District who is authorized in such capacity on beh
of the City or the District to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or take part
negotiating, making, accepting, or approving of this agreement, shall become directly
indirectly interested personally in this contract or in any part thereof. No officer
employee of the City or the District who is authorized in such capacity and on behalf
the City or the District to exercise any executive, supervisory, or similar functions
9 rev. 2/15/
I I w w
connection with the performance of this contract shall become directly or indirec
interested personally in this contract or any part thereof.
22. VERBAL AGREEMENT OR CONVERSATION
No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, agent, or employee of tl
City or the District, either before, during or after the execution of this contract, sh
affect or modify any of the terms or obligations herein contained nor entitle t,
Contractor to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this contract.
23. SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS
Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 18, "Hold Harmless Agreement," l
terms, conditions, and provisions hereof shall inure to and shall bind each of the partic
hereto, and each of their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, ar
assigns.
24. EFFECTIVE DATE
This agreement shall be effective on and from the day and year first writtf
above.
25. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The City has determined, using the guidelines of the Political Reform Act and tt
City's conflict of interest code, that the Contractor will not be required to file a conflict I
interest statement as a requirement of this agreement. However, Contractor heret
acknowledges that Contractor has the legal responsibility for complying with tt,
Political Reform Act and nothing in this agreement releases Contractor from thi
responsibility.
10 rev. 2/15/0
I , w w
26. INSURANCE
The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of the contract and a
and all amendments insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage
property which may arise out of or in connection with performance of the wc
hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractor
Said insurance shall be obtained from an insurance carrier admitted and authorized
do business in the State of California. The insurance carrier is required to have
current Best's Key Rating of not less than "A-:V" and shall meet the City's policy f
insurance as stated in Resolution No. 91-403 and the District's policy for insurance i
stated in Resolution No. 772.
A. Coveraaes and Limits.
Contractor shall maintain the types of coverages and minimum limi
indicated herein, unless a lower amount is approved by the City Attorney/Gener
Counsel or City ManagedExecutive Manager:
1. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance. $1,000,000 combine
single-limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If th
submitted policies contain aggregate limits, general aggregate limits shall appl
separately to the work under this contract or the general aggregate shall be twice th
required per occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability (if the use of an automobile is involved fc
Contractor's work for the City/District). $1,000,000 combined single-limit per accider
for bodily injury and property damage.
11 rev. 2/15/01
I 1 w W
3. Workers' Compensation and Employes's Liability. Worke
Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California a
Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury.
4. Professional Liability. Errors and omissions liability appropriate
the contractor's profession with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim. Covera!
shall be maintained for a period of five years following the date of completion of tl
work.
9. Additional Provisions.
Contractor shall ensure that the policies of insurance required under tt
agreement contain, or are endorsed to contain, the following provisions.
1. The City and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District shall be name
as additional insureds on all policies excluding Workers' Compensation ar
Professional Liability.
2. The Contractor shall furnish certificates of insurance to the Ci
before commencement of work.
3. The Contractor shall obtain occurrence coverage, excludin
Professional Liability which shall be written as claims-made coverage.
4. This insurance shall be in force during the life of the agreement an
any extension thereof and shall not be canceled without 30 days prior written notice 1
the City sent by certified mail.
5. If the Contractor fails to maintain any of the insurance coverage
required herein, then the City will have the option to declare the Contractor in breach, c
may purchase replacement insurance or pay the premiums that are due on existin
policies in order that the required coverages may be maintained. The Contractor i
12 rev. 2/15/0
I L w V
responsible for any payments made by the City to obtain or maintain such insuran
and the City may collect the same from the Contractor or deduct the amount paid frc
any sums due the Contractor under this agreement.
27. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
The name of the persons who are authorized to give written notices or to receij
written notice on behalf of the City/District and on behalf of the Contractor in connectic
with the foregoing are as follows:
For City: Title Deputy City Engineer
Name William E. Plummer, P.E.
Address 1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
< For Contractor: Title ,,€LIulJL \('(LE ?6fSIbENT
Name JAvlGs !A. 'iZcFiE(2T5
Address 517 Fourth Avenue, Suite 301
San Diego, California 92101
Architect/License Number: a Cf 334:^1
Architect/ License Number:
28. BUSINESS LICENSE
Contractor shall obtain and maintain a City of Carlsbad Business License forth
duration of the contract.
29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement, together with any other written document referred to c
contemplated herein, embody the entire agreement and understanding between th
parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this agreement nor any provisio
hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument il
13 rev. 2/15/01
* w w
writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver
discharge is sought.
Executed by Contractor this \ g-th day of APZC l- ,20~
CONTRACTOR:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., a
North Carolina corporation
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal
corporation of the State of California
(sign here) - ATTEST:
By: Q-Lh!L*/h A c/
JA/\~E~ M.K~?,EcTs , S,-Y?- 1 LOR INE M. WOOD, City Clerk
(print name and title), ’
{ (sign here)
0411 iq 1-5 T Lb.d j 9s i, (5. i;tunt
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT, a Public Agency organized
under the Municipal Water Act of 191 1, and a Subsidiary District of the City of
Carlsbad
I, (print namekitley 5 c c, ~ +b
CCE 3-3487
ArchiteWLicense Number
1
(Proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by Contractor must be attached.)
(Chairman, president or vice-president and secretary, assistant secretary , CFO or assistant treasurt must sign for corporations. Otherwise, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secreta1 or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering that officer(s) signing to bind the corporation.)
(if signed by an individual partner, the partnership must attach a statement of partnership authorizing th partner to execute this instrument.)
APPROV AS TO yj3
Depu City Attorney ( ,,J~ ,)A\ ,x- y
,,m/ co WJC / BY
14 rev. 2/15/0
, w w
State of California 1 1 County of San Diego )
On April 19, 2000, before me, Belinda R. Guzman, Notary Public, personally appear(
Dennis J. Landaal and James M. Roberts proved to me on the basis of satisfacto
evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument ai
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and th
by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or entity upon behalf of which tl
persons acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal
(This area for
official notary seal)
u 4 L&Ly&Zw
Signature of Notary
Title or Type of Document
Date of Document April 19, 2000 No. of Pages
Signer(s) other than named above
Professional Services Agreement for Kimely-Horn & Assc
for Environmental Impact Report
None
* w w
m Kimley-Horn ,nmn and Associates, lnc.
P.O.
Me
2761
Certificate of Corporate Counsel/Assistant Secretary
Mr. William E. Pulmmer
Deputy City Engineer
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad CA 92008
Dear Mr. Puher:
T am the duly qualified and acting Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary of
firnley-Nom and Associates, hc., a North Carolina Corporation.
The €allowing is a true copy of a resoludon duly adopted by &he Board of
Directors of the corporalion at the annual meeting duly held on December 15,
1999 and entered in the minutes of such meeting in the minute book of the
corporation.
“Resolved tlmt the individuals nmd on the attached lists are hereby
designated aulhorized contract signers for the corporation (see
attachments). ”
The resolutmn is in conformity with the articles of incorporation and bylaws of
the corporation, has never been modified or repealed, and is now in full force
and effect.
Dated Apnl 18,2000. &-c-&a
Richard N. Cook, Corporate Counsel
and Assistant Secretary
(corporate seal)
m
TEL 819 677 2000
FAX 919 677 2050
W' 9 ,,, ... *" "" , . "", .- -. .....--.
Kimley-Born nnd Assoclntes, Inc.
Con he t Signiug Authority
Standard Authority March, 2000
ATLANTA LAS VEG.4S SAN DXEGO
Dawkins,Chrish N Fms,Geofge B DeWitt,Timorhy J
S~hith.B~~t A LandazLDeanis J 6-
Spinlcs,Charlcs R TarbunokJeffky A LOS ANGELES
AUSTIN Dvoralt, Jr.,WiIlismE SARASOT*
Alaogge,Gory J Sroval1,Thamss M
STUART
Kicfcr~chEel E
Timoncy,Edwwd W
TALLAHASSEE
Bam,FLicherd R
TAMPA
Brame,Daniel S MEMPHIS
BOULDER Collins,James F
Bunch,Jamcs K MLAMI BEACH Venar,Michael S
C€€ARLOTTE
Blakley, Jr.,Stephen W
Moore.Richard H Barmnciyan,Herm3n
MingoncrM. s
ORANGE
DALLAS ORLANDO
Hacto&ChIiStopherC
Stcbbms,dam S
TUCSON
CanerJohn I: Firtcl,Laura B
Hal1,James R Jodcson,JBy R HubenJohn P
PHOENIX Kurfees.Wayne PembrokqWilliam G
Shcllsbsrgcr,Rebecca X PerkinqDsvid D WatsonJloyd T Melvin,Enda
FFUSCO
AbbotrFrank G Willie,Norman D Biby,Roscoe L AlIhoqLR K Wripht,Chda R Doscher,Scott
Mullis,JeMcy
Pelan.Keirb A Risinger,Dadd L FT. WORTH PORTLAND
Wsddill,William D Woodward,Dnvid f Gary,Glcnn A WestJamcs E
=TON ROADS .RALEIGH WEST PALM BEACH
CherrypauI L McPherson,Karcn C Bishop,Pcta A
Edgnr,Joseph L Vincen~,Dcan G Eisenhnrdt,Jmes M
Momson.Russell C WalkerJohn D Pink,Ktnneth L
HauscrIEdwin w O'NealJulie R
Pom,John E HOUSTON Horn,Ross M
Schwaxu.Frederick W Marccau,Daren E
SrcwarLDavid W Lott,Jamcs S Mcisncr,Laurencc I
Vcilleu~,Despina J SchulkqHsrold J Miller,Robert M
Vsn Riper,Kent L
WEMINGTON j~c-0-E Willifard,,AUen L
Wilson,Jon E
Barbour,Georgt R Cuaight&uCc L Schaefer,Williun E
Plasencia,Dougl~ J RashawJamcs G VERO BEACH
Tappcndorf,Donald L Wilcax,Bruce D Banfitl4Fred R
Page 1
9 w w ... -- - - I -I
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Contract Signing Authority
Full Authority March, 2000
ATLANTA HAMPTON ROU €3ALEmi
Pate,Willim B Bagby, IKI,Thomas J Klinc,Donald H
BAY AREA Nash,Willism A Pmny,€L D
Ncjad,Anwh A
BOULDER
FlctcheqJim E Ldhsxum Zimmennan, Jt.Jemes L
Chavers,James T 0lmsred.Vamer T
RohrbaughJLichard R
Voisin,William J Wells,George E Wilson,h4ark S Wright,Robert G
HOUSTON Vick, Jr.,C. E
BendiQJohn F
BFUDENTON Acktrcr,Kmeth W ~BMOND - SprWeaaR
EIlis,Richard W Coopcr,Kurt D MEMPHIS
CHARLESTON $AN m Win,J. S
Calevich,Deborah L Robrrts,lsmesM 6- yTJafILAKxs Sorenson,David K
CHAR1,OTn Ssxen4K. K
Garlow,Gnry M MYRTLE BEACH M~o,dm
DALLAS WiKongJrobert F
Bartlett,Douald L Gaskey,Kewn S ORANGE
Henigsman,Deau A Wallace,Gary W Robinson,Cuol M Ciudell&,Sme A
Swndler,Rodendc P WEST P&&i BEACH Truex,Tcmy M ORLANDO
Barham,Banon J Wheltn,Thomas L
Godfrey,Stewn G Christie,Mona J WilshiqRoy L
Geer,Charles L BENVER PHOENIX Ingram,Jeny W
Otnbrink,Stcphen J
BnrdtPavid R Chrisum,Bmt L Pcrd,Brooks H Marsdcn,Blair G Conrad,John R PollockJoseph B
SARASOU
VERO BEACH
AkJohn C
SwansonJoseph C CoreyJred C Rapp,Wm f
MarhewqWilliam D FRTSCO Murphy,Terence T Thompson,Rjchard L S&ller,Michael G Thornburg,Murray D
Bums,Grcgory B Wall, nI,Henry B ViWarold D
FT. LAUDERDALE RALEIGH
Bamc3,Roy R Adms,Richard C Coomu;B. D Atkim,h4arlc E Barber,Bmy L FT. WORTH Burchen,Thomas F Byrd,Michnel N Stapla,Chsrles M Cook,hchard N
Tnbblc,Guy B Donaldson,Joe K
EIhs,Nicholu L
Squires, Chnst ophcr A
Page 1
LA1 LIUI L w w
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for the Faraday Avenue extension (Orion Street to Melrose Driv
South Agua Hedionda Sewer, associated water and sewer facilities and the Carlsb
Oaks North Business Park EIR is detailed below. The scope is broken down by 1
following major tasks:
1. Preliminary Engineering
2. Environmental Documentation
3. Final Design
I. Preliminary Engineering
I .I Faraday Avenue Extension
Proposed Project Approach and Work Plan
The proposed project consists of a 1.3 mile extension of Faraday Avenue from Orion Street
near Melrose Drive. The project area is primarily undisturbed native vegetation that incluc
sensitive habitat such as coastal sage scrub, riparian forest and wetlands. With the sensit
habitat, the most critical component of this project will be the environmental analysis. With (
team’s most recently completed project, Olympic Parkway, we know what it will take to obt:
environmental clearance for Faraday Avenue, and have structured the project approach a
work plan to obtain early environmental clearance.
Our team’s approach to the Faraday project will be two phased. The first phase will be t
environmental analysis and preliminary engineering. The results of the first phase will be
identify the least damaging practicable alternative and most likely prepare a Mitigated Negati
Declaration. The second phase will be the preparation of construction documents including fii
design, specifications, and cost estimate. The project approach is arranged into the followi
major task sections:
Phase 1. Environmental Analysis and Preliminary Engineering
A. Reconnaissance
B. Alternative Identification
C. Alternative Analysis
Phase 2. Final Design
The following describes the purpose, methodology, and deliverables for the preliminary tasks.
Phase 7: Environmental Analysis and Preliminary Engineering
As mentioned above, the proposed project will traverse through primarily undisturbed nati
vegetation. Sensitive habitats potentially impacted include coastal sage scrub, scrub o
chaparral, southern coast live oak riparian forest, and wetlands. In terms of upland habi
impacts, the project is covered by the City’s Habitat Management Plan, of which a Draft
currently under review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department
w 9 .,
Fish and Game. The general approach to the project will involve conducting initial prelimin:
field reconnaissance studies focusing on biological and archaeological resources, traffic a
civil engineering; the subsequent analysis and documentation of preliminary design alternativ
to select the least damaging alternative; project definition and preparation of an initial stuc
determination of appropriate environmental documentation; and, preparation of a mitigat
negative declaration or an environmental impact report.
Task IA: Reconnaissance
The project team will conduct a preliminary reconnaissance of the study area to identify loc
conditions of the environment. This preliminary reconnaissance will address all environmen
and engineering issues relevant to the proposed project; however, the environmen
reconnaissance will focus on biological and cultural resources in the area of potential affe
The purpose of this work effort is to identify sensitive environmental areas prior to the design
the roadway so that impacts to sensitive resources can be minimized. In addition, engineeri
and geotechnical opportunities and constraints will be examined.
Engineering
This task will evaluate existing technical and other background information and establish desi1 criteria to guide the project delivery, identifying opportunities and constraints in developing ti
least damaging practicable alternative.
Data Collection
We will obtain and review technical and other background information pertinent to the projec
Kimley-Horn will rely on the City of Carlsbad to assist in obtaining this information. The da
that will be collected includes but is not limited to Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park Tentatif
Map and associated studies, drainage studies, and existing right-of-way.
Survey and Mapping
Topographic mapping will be produced for the various phases of the project. For tt
environmental phase we are proposing to provide a three dimensional 1”=100’ scale, 5’ conto
interval digital map along with a 1”=200’ digital black and white orthographic photo for the larg
study area. Once the least damaging practicable alternative is identified, a 1 ”=40’ with one-foc
contour interval electronic base map will be completed for the final design.
Existing right-of-way will be added to the mapping. The right-of-way will include city and mun
boundaries, any irrevocable offers of dedication, and privately held land.
Design Criteria
Design criteria will be established to guide the design of Faraday Avenue. The criteria w
include geometric design, drainage, grading, safety and operational, utilities, and conformanc
with City of Carlsbad and other regional standards. Typical sections will be completed to identi
roadway and parkway widths and side slope grading.
23854
April 2000~age
I w w
Geofechnical
Our proposed scope of services to prepare the geologic reconnaissance report will inch
research and field studies to prepare a summary of the geologic condition and provide
general evaluation of the geologic hazards. Specifically we propose to perform the following:
w A review of in-house and client-provided geotechnical reports pertinent to the site.
w A geologic reconnaissance of the site.
w A review of aerial photographs.
w Prepare general geologic mapping of the site conditions.
Preparation of a report to provide a general summary of the geologic conditions at the s
pertinent to the proposed development. The summary report will address the following:
-
-
- Identify potential geologic and seismic hazards including soil liquefaction, late
'
Description of the site and general site geology.
Geologic mapping of the study area.
spreading, seismically induced settlement, landsliding, and faulting.
Drainage
If available, the Kimley-Horn team will review preliminary drainage calculations for Carlsb:
Oaks North Business Park. Any discrepancies to the design criteria typically applied to a sirnil
project will be noted and communicated to the City of Carlsbad. In addition, we will gath
existing data from the County of San Diego and other sources to provide flow estimates f
preliminary design.
According to previous studies completed by Rick Engineering a detention basin will be requirt
on the proposed Faraday Avenue/South Agua Hedionda Creek crossing. In o
communications with Rick Engineering, many design issues need to be resolved as part of o
design efforts. Therefore we are proposing a two phased approach with tl
conceptual/preliminary design and then final design. The estimated effort with the conce
design includes review of Rick Engineering hydrologic analysis, preliminary grading, out11
structure concept design and hydraulics, and environmental review (including wildlife corridc
analysis). A brief conceptual design report will be prepared that summarizes the hydrolog
analysis, the outlet hydraulics, the embankment design and the preliminary construction co
estimate. The HEC-1 hydrologic model prepared by Rick engineering will be used for tt
detentim basin sizing and outlet design.
Deliverables: Environmental Opportunity and Constraints mapping
Design Criteria Technical Memorandum
Geological mapping
Base Mapping
2385-1
April 2000~agt
, i - w
Task 7B; Alfernafive Identification
Based on the results of the Preliminary Reconnaissance, the KHA team will analyze up to thrl
preliminary design alternatives and the no build alternative. The alternatives will be design1
on AutoCAD using the 1 "=I 00' topographic mapping, the established design criteria, typic
sections, and opportunity and constraints mapping. The design will include horizontal locatic
vertical profile, drainage basins and limits of grading as well as possible identification
potential borrow site locations. The purpose of each of the alternatives will be to minimi
impacts to the sensitive habitat.
Deliverables: Up to three preliminary alternatives drawn on the topographic mapping and t
opportunity and constraints mapping.
Task IC: Alternative Analysis
Roadway alignments within the study area will impact wetlands, requiring a Section 404 pem
A requirement under EPA Section 404(b)(l) Guidelines exists to seek practicable alternatives
fill within wetlands and waters of the US. This task would include early consultation w
resource agencies to help identify and address specific resource agency concerns. This effc
will be well-documented through the preparation of a brief (Le., 20 page) report th
demonstrates to the resource agencies the process undertaken by the City to identify the lez
environmentally damaging practicable alternative (LDPA). This report would be incorporated
whole, or part, into the environmental documentation prepared for the project.
The alternative analysis will focus on the following:
1. Environmental Impacts
2. Conformance to design criteria
3. Traffic Impacts
4. costs
Environmental impacts
The biological analysis would include focused discussions on Coastal Sage Scrub, wetland
sensitive species issues, and on-site mitigation, as well as wildlife corridor viability under tt
proposed design alternatives. The alternatives analysis report would also discuss all sensitb
vegetatiodhabitat types, and CEQA sensitive species which are present or highly likely to t
present on site. The .analysis would identify conformance of the current site conditions wi
those identified previously on the site. Where prudent, recommendations would be given
provide alternatives for avoiding significant impacts to biological resources.
Several issues are perceived as critical to pending Carlsbad HMP compliance and project(
USFWS/CDFG response to the proposed project. In particular, impacts to Coastal Sage ScrL
and wildlife corridors are expected to be closely scrutinized. The analysis would include
focused discussion of these issues under the proposed design. The report would address nl
. only specific issues such as wetland mitigation needs, but would also address concerns relath
to the potential for any specific alignment to impact sub-area linkage viability.
2385-
April 200O~agi
, w w
The report would identify the need for any additional biological permits. If special focus4
sensitive plant/animal surveys are not required, the report would be deliverable within six wee
of conveyance of maps and receipt of authorization to proceed. If additional surveys a
necessary, final report delivery would be delayed until such surveys could be complete
However, an interim draft could be provided to allow completion of other work effor
Subsequent modifications may be necessary upon completion of the final analyses. Merkel
Associates would work with city staff, particularly project design engineers, to develop a le:
environmentally damaging, practicable alignment alternative, and determine required mitigatic
for the project.
The cultural resources mapping would be utilized in the selection of the preferred alternati
alignment. However, cultural resources site significance testing is not covered under tl
proposed cost estimate. If site significance testing is required at this stage in order to ident
the least impactive alignment, then a separate cost estimate would be provided at that tir
depending on the number and size of sites identified for testing. Any testing would be geared
satisfy both CEQA and Section 106 requirements.
Traffic Impacts
Using the traffic analysis prepared as part of the reconnaissance phase, traffic impacts will t
assessed for each alternative. It is expected that the impacts for the three build alternatives H
be similar and that the no-build alternative will have the greatest impact.
Conformance to Design Criteria
In working with the environmental constraints, it is quite possible that the design of the roadw;
might not conform to all design criteria. In previous projects we have avoided biological as wc
as cultural resources by using non-standard design elements such as steeper vertical grade
smaller radius horizontal curvature with super-elevation, steeper side slopes and narrc parkways. This criteria will evaluate the safety and operational aspects of non-standard desi!
features.
costs
One of the most significant aspects of developing the LPDA are the constructions costs as WI
as the environmental mitigation costs. Costs will be developed for each alternative and \n include:
Construction
= Right-of-way
Environmental mitigation
rn Add-on (i.e. design, administration and contingencies)
Earthwork could be one of the substantial construction cost items. Our preliminary review 1
the preliminary alignment shows significant fills indicating the possibility of importing materi:
Knowing the potential location of the borrow site(s) will be critical in developing a cost estimatl
the most economical borrow sites will come from the adjacent development. We will als
2385-
April 2000~agl
, W w
examine costs for potential structures (bridges and retaining walls) to minimize impacts to tl
environment as well as to reduce the overall earthwork,
1.2 South Agua Hedionda Sewer
The South Aqua Hedionda Interceptor sewer transverse undeveloped land from the existii
Raceway Lift Station on the City limits with Vista, approximately 11,700 feet, to the intersectic
with College Blvd. extension. This reach includes section SAHTIA (15”) SAHTIB (18
SAHTl C (1 87, and SAHTl D (1 8”) from The Carollo Master Plan. The project will eliminate tl
need for the Raceway Lift Station and allow gravity flow for discharges from Vista and witt
Carlsbad. The ultimate flow at the downstream end of the project reach (SAHTI D) is 4.74 mg
The Scope and Fee presented here are based on the alignment presented in the 19
O’Day Consultants study. This alignment includes 18 and 21 inch VC Pipe with deptl
up-to 45 feet and directional drilled siphon and mircotunnel options. This alignme
may not be the best option for this project. The Preliminary Engineering Study \F
address alternatives to the O’Day Study alignment that may be more practical.
The proposed project approach to the South Aqua Hedionda is similar to the approac
described for the Faraday Road environmental analysis and preliminary design. As \n
be discussed in the environmental documentation section, both the roadway proje
and the sewer project will combined into one environmental document, which
assumed to be an Environmental Impact Report.
As described in the Faraday Road proposal, the project approach will include tl
following major tasks:
1. Environmental Analysis and Preliminary Engineering.
1 A. Reconnaissance
I B. Alternative Identification
1 C Alternative Analysis
1 D. Environmental Documentation
1E Permits
The team for this portion will include includes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Cottc
Beland and Associates for environmental, Merkel and Associates for biology at
Kennedy Jen ks for trenchless pipeline design.
The following details the scope of work assumed for each of the above tasks.
2385
April 2000~as
w ‘_I
1A. Reconnaissance
The proposed sewer traverses through primarily undisturbed native vegetati
impacting sensitive habitat. In terms of upland habitat impacts, the project is cover
by the City’s Habitat Management Plan of which a draft is currently under review by t
U.S. Fish Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game. Separi
permits is assumed to be required by the US Army Corp of Engineers, US Fish a
Wildlife Service, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Departmt
of Fish and Game.
The general approach to the project will involve conducting initial preliminary fic
reconnaissance studies focusing on biological and archaelogical resources, CI
engineering; the subsequent analysis and documentation of preliminary desi1
alternatives to select the least environmentally damaging alternative, project definiti
and preparation of an initial study; determination of appropriate environmen
documentation.
The project team will conduct a preliminary reconnaissance of the study area to ideni
local conditions of the environment. This preliminary reconnaissance will address
environmental and engineering issues relevant to the proposed project; however, t
environmental reconnaissance will focus on biological and cultural resources in the ar
of potential effect. The purpose of this work effort is to identify sensitive environmen
areas prior to the design of the roadway so that impacts to sensitive resources can
minimized. In addition, engineering and geotechincal opportunities and constraints UI
be examined.
Biology
After reviewing existing biological resource documents relevant to the proposed projec
the study area would be reviewed by Merkel & Associates (M&A) biologists for changc
in conditions or any substantial new information regarding on-site sensitive biologic
resources, or issues which may affect routing decisions. The study corridor for tl
sewer is assumed to be 300 feet wide. Of particular interest are the distribution
Coastal Sage Scrub and wetlands, and the potential presence of the federally listc
California Gnatcatcher, Least Bell’s Vireo, state and federally listed sensitive plants,
other sensitive species known from the area such as Nuttal’s Scrub Oak, Palmei
Grapplinghook, Western Dichondra, and California Adolphia. The objective of M&f
surveys would be primarily to expand existing data where necessary but not to repe
prior work. Where significant changes have occurred or deficiencies in existing da
are noted, further studies may be recommended to help ensure that alignments do n
require significant modification as a result of future findings. Additional focused. surve!
2385
April 2000~ag
w w
may be required by the resources agencies where previous focused surveys did n
4 cover all areas of potential impact, or where previous surveys are outdated. Costs 1
these focused surveys have been included within the attached cost proposal.
Deliverables: A jurisdictional wetland delineation will be necessary for U.S. Army Cor
of Engineers’ permit approval. All necessary delineations would be performed aloi
the various alternative routes to determine the potential impact levels. This informatic
would assist in sewer siting, to reduce impacts to biological resources, includii
wetland resources. A standard wetland delineation report would be prepared coverii
the identified portion of the wetlands on-site. The. report would allow for a determinatic
of wetland acreage impacts given specific construction routes within the study are
One combined biological technical document will be prepared for the road and sewer.
Cultural Resources
The cultural resources study will focus upon the identification of resources within a 30
foot wide corridor of the trunk sewer alignment. The conclusion of the cultur
resources studies in Task 1 would be the presentation of a map showing the location
all archaeological sites within the corridor. The project area has not been previous
surveyed, so the extent of resources is not known. The location of the trunk sew
along a substantial drainage with extensive biological habitat suggests that the potenti
for cultural resources is high. The cultural resources scope will include: a recorc
search to determine if any archaeological sites have been recorded within tt
alignment; review of previous studies in the project area; an intense archaeologic
survey to local all cultural resources within the APE; and mapping and recording
identified sites.
Testing of cultural resources, if identified in the project’s APE, will be necessary
determine importance/significance under CEQA and to determine the site’s eligibility f
the National Register. The program designed for testing will include surface mapping
artifacts and features, subsurface testing to establish the boundaries of any cultui
deposits and all laboratory analyses necessary to record and interpret the artifa
recoveries. The scope of work for the cultural resources testing cannot be determint
at this time because the size and complexity of any sites that may be located within tt
project is not yet known. In order to facilitate the environmental review process, tt
budget includes $10,000 for cultural resources testing. The $10,000 budget amount fc
cultural resource testing is an estimate and may only be partially utilized or may t
exceeded depending on the extent of cultural resources identified in the APE.
Deliverable: A combined roadway and sewer brief summary report.
2385
April 2000~ag
L W w
Engineering
This task will evaluate existing technical and other background information an
establish design criteria to guide the project delivery, identify opportunities an
constraints in developing the least damaging practicable alternative.
Data Collection
We will obtain and review technical and other background information pertinent to th
project. Kimley-Horn will rely on the City of Carlsbad in assist in obtaining th
information. The data that will be collected includes but is not limited to Carlsbad Oak
North Business Park Tentative Map and associated studies, drainage studies an
existing right-of-way.
Survey and Mapping
Topographic mapping will be produced for the various phases of the project. For th
environmental phase we are proposing to provide a three dimensional 1”=100’ scale, i
contour interval digital map along with a 1”=200’ digital black and white orthograph
photo for the larger study area. Once the least damaging practicable alternative
identified, a 1”=40’ with one-foot contour interval electronic base map will be complete
for the final design.
Additional field shots will be taken in areas obliterated from view of the aerial flight.
Once the mapping is completed for the environmental phase, existing right-of-way w
be added. The right-of-way will include city and county boundaries, any irrevocabl
offers of dedication, privately held land as well as any known easements. It is assume
that the developer or the City of Carlsbad will provide the required title reports.
Utilities
Existing and known dry and wet utilities will be identified and added to the base mal
No pot holing is assumed for this phase. The effort includes as-built (record drawin!
research and field survey of visible utilities.
2385.
April 2000~ag
w w
Design Criteria
Design criteria will be established to guide the design of the Aqua Hedionda Sew€
The criteria will include, maximum and minimum grades and pipe cover, trenching ar
bedding, micro-tunneling parameters, directional drilling requirements, drainag
grading, odor control, metering, safety and operational, utilities, and conformance wi
City of Carlsbad and other regional standards. Typical sections will be completed
identify maximum sewer depth, and side slope grading.
Geotechnical
Our proposed scope of services to prepare the geologic reconnaissance report v\
include research and field studies to prepare a summary of the geologic condition ai
provide a general evaluation of the geologic hazards. We will also perform limit€
subsurface exploration along the westerly and easterly sides of Los Monos Canyor
Specifically we propose to perform the following:
0 A review of in-house and client-provided geotechnical reports pertinent to the site.
0 A geologic reconnaissance of the site.
0 A review of aerial photographs.
0 Prepare general geologic mapping of the site conditions.
0 Excavation of 6 to 8 trenches using a rubber tired backhoe.
0 Excavation of 3 to 4 borings using truck-mounted air percussion drill rig. During tt
drilling program, we propose to collect drive samples and 4 to 6 rock core samplc
for laboratory testing of compressive strength.
Excavation of 4 to 6 borings using a limited-access drill rig.
0 Conduct 5 to 6 seismic traverse lines to evaluate the shear wave velocities of th
underlying materials for consideration in evaluating rippability.
Preparation of a report to provide a general summary of the geologic conditions i
the site pertinent to the proposed development. The summary report will addre:
the following:
0
2385-
April 2000~age
w w
-
-
-
Description of the site, proposed alignments and general site geology.
Geologic mapping of the study area.
Identify potential geologic and seismic hazards including soil liquefactio
lateral spreading, seismically induced settlement, landsliding, faulting.
Description of investigative techniques, including log of all borings, trench€
seismic travese lines and soundings.
Laboratory test results of rock core strengths.
-
-
- Trench stability issues (preliminary).
Sysfeem Flows and Hydraulics
As part of this task Kimley-Horn and Associates will review and analyze the tributz
flow areas, average daily flow rates and peak flow rates entering the sewer. We v
also coordinate with the City of Vista to insure that all flows, gravity and pumped a
incorporated.
Drainage
A stream channel hydraulic study will be prepared and based on a previous study
Rick Engineering. A HECRAS hydraulic model of the Aqua Hedionda Creek (Sun
Creek) from Rancho Carlsbad Golf Course to just upstream of the proposed Farad
Avenue crossing will be prepared. The 100 year water surface elevation will be us
for minimum manhole elevations and the hydraulic parameters will be used <
calculating scour depth at stream crossings and for channel modifications required
the final design.
Deliverables - - Design Criteria Technical Memorandum - Geological mapping - Base Mapping - Stream Channel Hydraulic Study
Environmental Opportunibj and Constraints mapping
238
April 2000~ag
W w
1 B. Alternative Identification
Based on the results of the Preliminary Reconnaissance, the KHA team will analyze i
to three preliminary design alternatives and the no build alternative. The alternativc
will be designed on AutoCAD using the 1”=100’, 5-foot contour topographic mappin
the established design criteria, typical sections and opportunity and constrain
mapping. The design will include horizontal location, vertical profile, access roads, ar
limits of grading as well as possible borrow site locations. The purpose of each of tt
alternatives will be to minimize impacts to the sensitive habitat.
Deliverables: Up to three preliminary alternative plan and profile drawings and tt
opportunity and constraints mapping.
IC. Alternative analysis
The alternative analysis will focus on the following:
1. Environmental Impacts
2. Conformance to design criteria
3. costs
Sewer alignments within the study area will impact wetlands, requiring a Section 4(
permit. A requirement under EPA Section 404(b)(l) Guidelines exists to sec
practicable alternatives to construction within wetlands and waters of the U.S. This ta
would include early consultation with resource agencies to help identify and addre
specific resource agency concerns. This effort will be well-documented through tl
preparation of a brief (Le., 20 page) report that demonstrates to the resource agencii
the process undertaken by the City to identify the least environmentally damagii
practicable alternative. This report would be incorporated in whole, or part, into tl
environmental documentation prepared for the project.
The biological analysis would include focused discussions on Coastal Sage Scru
wetlands, sensitive species issues, and on-site mitigation, as well as wildlife corrid
viability under the proposed design alternatives. The alternatives analysis report WOL
also discuss all sensitive vegetatiodhabitat’ types, and CEQA sensitive species whil
are present or highly likely to be present on site. The analysis would ident
conformance of the current site conditions with those identified previously on the si1
Where prudent, recommendations would be given to provide alternatives for avoidii
significant impacts to biological resources.
238:
April 2000~agi
w w
. Several issues are perceived as critical to pending Carlsbad HCP compliance ai
projected USFWSKDFG response to the proposed project. In particular, impacts
Coastal Sage Scrub and wildlife corridors are expected to be closely scrutinized. TI
analysis would include a focused discussion of these issues under the proposi
design. The report would address not only specific issues such as wetland mitigatic
needs, but would also address concerns relative to the potential for any speci
alignment to impact subarea linkage viability.
The report would identify the need for any additional biological permits. If spec
focused sensitive plant/animal surveys are not required, the report would be deliverat
within six weeks of conveyance of maps and receipt of authorization to proceed.
additional surveys are necessary, final report delivery would be delayed until su
surveys could be completed. However, an interim draft could be provided to all(
completion of other work efforts. Subsequent modifications may be necessary up
completion of the final analyses. M&A would work with city staff, particularly projt
design engineers, to develop a least environmentally damaging, practicable alignmc
alternative, and determine required mitigation for the project.
The cultural resources mapping conducted under Task I could be utilized in t
selection of the preferred alternative alignment. Cultural resources site significan
testing is covered (up to an amount of $10,000) under the proposed cost estimate.
site significance testing is required at this stage in order to identify the least impacti
alignment, then a separate cost estimate would be provided at that time depending
the number and size of sites identified for testing. Any testing would be geared
satisfy both CEQA and Section 106 requirements.
1.3 Associated Utilities
The proposed tasks are described in detail below:
1. Sewer siphon. The Buena Sanitation District is requesting that their existing 1
sanitary sewer siphon be relocated within the proposed Faraday Avenue. T
proposed sewer will connect to the existing sewer located at the City of Vista c
limits and to the existing sewer at the proposed Faraday Avenue crossing oft
existing siphon for a total distance of approximately 5880 feet. The prelimin:
design effort includes route identification and coordination with the City of Visk
Local sewer serving the Tchang development. A sanitary sewer will
required within the proposed Faraday Avenue to serve the proposed Tcha
April 2000~ac
2.
238
w w
property. The City of Carlsbad will provide the approved sewer master plan wi
the design flows. The sewer will begin at the proposed eastern roadway ar
connect to the proposed South Agua Hedionda Sewer for a total length
approximately 2200 feet. The preliminary design effort includes rou
identification and coordination with the Tchang development
Domestic water line. A 12” PVC water line is proposed to be constructed with
the proposed Faraday Avenue from Orion Avenue east to the city limits for i
approximate length of 7400 feet. The preliminary design effort includc
identification of appurtenances, fire hydrants, and stub connection for tl
Tchang property. The City will provide design flows and computer pipe syste
network analysis. This proposal assumes the water system is in a sins
pressure zone and that no pressure reducing facility will be required.
Reclaimed water line. The proposed reclaimed water line will have the Sam
assumption and limits as the domestic water line.
3.
4.
Deliverables: Preliminary design of the associated utilities.
2385
April 2000~age
w rn
2. Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park EIR
COVERAGE OF THE EIR
This Program EIR will analyze the impacts associated with the actions necessary
implement the proposed project which consists of 22 industrial lots and 4 open spac
lots and the extension of Faraday Avenue from its existing eastern terminus in the Ci
of Carlsbad to its existing western terminus at the City’s eastern boundary. TI
environmental review for this project will also include the South Aqua Hedionda sew
interceptor from the project’s easterly boundary to the Faraday-El Fuerte intersectic
and northwesterly to the Sunny Creek area to a point of proposed connection genera
known as the southeasterly corner of the Barlow property. The South Aqua Hedionc
interceptor from this point westerly to its point of connection in El Camino Real at tl
entrance to Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park has been designed and is part of tl
Terraces project which has been approved and is currently under final design.
1. General Plan Amendment (GPA97-05) - This amendment would amend tl
General Plan Land Use Map to reflect the increased areas of open space ai
reduced acres of planned industrial categories.
Zone Change (ZC97-05) - As proposed, a change is being requested to tl
zoning designation from a planned community (PC) designation to plannc
industrial (P-M) and open space (OS) to ensure consistency with the Genei
Plan.
Specific Plan No. 211 - The applicant is requesting adoption of a Specific PI;
to provide for orderly development of a 414 acre industrial park consistent wi
City requirements.
Zone 16 Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment - This plan would I
revised to reflect the modifications in land use and changes in builda
projections and facilities demands.
Tentative Map (CT97-13) - The applicant is proposing one tentative map
subdivide and grade 22 industrial lots and 3 open space lots over the enti
property. Offsite improvements include Faraday Avenue between the propert]
western boundary and the easterly terminus of Faraday Avenue and the onsi
and offsite alignment of the South Agua Hedionda Sewer Interceptor (SAH
The final subdivision map will be broken up into a number of smaller phases.
2.
3.
4.
5.
2385
April 2000~agt
w w
6. Hillside Development Permit (HDP97-10) - The proposed grading must t
conducted in conformance with the City of Carlsbad Hillside Developme
Ordinance.
Special Use Permit (SUP97-07) - A Flood Plain Special Use Permit is requirt
for development of the Faraday Ave. crossing over Agua Hedionda Creek.
State and Federal Permits - As part of the proposed project various State ai
Federal permits will be required to implement the project. These permits inch
but are not limited to: U.S Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit; 401 Pern
from the Regional Water Quality Control Board plus FAA Review to look
compatibility with the Palomar Airport Land Use Plan.
(No separate CDFG 1600 & 1603 permit or USFWS Section 7 consultation M
be required after the City HMP has been adopted).
7.
8.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Background
Carisbad is a city with a population of approximately 78,000 people. The City is locatt
along the northern coast of San Diego County thirty miles north of downtown S:
Diego. It is bordered to the north by the City of Oceanside, to the south by the City
Encinitas, on the east by the Cities of Vista and San Marcos, and on the west by tt
Pacific Ocean. Carlsbad has a combination of industrial, commercial and resident1
development, including a large regional shopping center, and auto retail center, sevei
large industrial parks, the LEGOLAND California Educational Park, and a region
airport. The City contains three lagoons, extensive agricultural areas and large tracts
undeveloped land. The total area of the City of Carlsbad is approximately 40 squa
miles.
In 1981 a general plan amendment was approved for the subject property whic
modified the land use element to reflect 282 acres of industrial and 135 acres of opt
space in the area that was shown as residential in the Valle Verde Planned Communi
Plan making it compatible with the existing 187 acres of planned industrial aloi
Palomar Airport Road. A major factor in the deliberations on the General PI:
Amendment was the property’s location in relation to non-residential uses and Palom
Airport. Industrial uses and open-space corridors were determined to be the ma
appropriate use for this area.
2385
April 2000~age
W - In 1986, the Carlsbad Airport Business Center Specific Plan (SP 200) was approve
Although the proposed Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park site was included as Art
B of SP 200, the document set forth the detailed regulations, conditions and progran
for development of Area A which consists of 187 acres located directly to the south
the project site. This area has been developed with industrial uses in accordance wi
approval of SP 200. The split of the Specific Plan into the southern and northern pal
was determined to be the best mechanism to allow development of the southern portic
of the Specific Plan. In 1986, it was anticipated that an amendment to the Carlsb;
Airport Business Center Specific Plan would take place to include a more detail(
discussion of the northern portion of the Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan f
the Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park site covered by this EIR is proposed in lieu
the amendment anticipated to address development of the site.
Site Location and Description
The proposed Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park is located on a 414-acre parc
north of Palomar Airport Road, 1/4 mile east of El Camino Real. The Carlsb;
Raceway is located approximately %mile east of the project site. Immediately north
the proposed project is the Dawson Los Monos Canyon Reserve. This sensitive area
part of the University of California Natural Land and Water Resources system and
used by the University for scientific and education purposes. The property is abuttc
to the west by vacant county land and the Coast Waste Trash Transfer Statio
Carlsbad Safety Center and Faraday Industrial Park are located to the west at ti
existing terminus of Faraday Avenue. The Carlsbad Airport Business Center (Carlsb;
Oaks) abuts the property to the south. Aqua Hedionda Creek in its southern fa
crosses the southerly portion of the site. This linear riparian woodland, consisting
oaks, willows and sycamore trees, will be retained in this area, however, crossings \F
occur with the alignmeht of Faraday Avenue both onsite and offsite to the west to Oric
Street along with the extension of El Fuerte Street and the alignment of the onsi
South Agua Hedionda Interceptor (SAHI) sewer line. Alternative alignments of pub
infrastructure are proposed to enable selection of the least environmentally damagii
alternative to minimize the impact on the riparian habitat.
In general, the Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park site is characterized by thn
different topographic areas: the north facing hillside slopes that extend down from tl
existing Carlsbad Airport Business Center development to the south, the rocky hi
which cover the central and northern site areas, and the intervening east west canyc
d ra in age.
238:
April 2000~agt
w ‘W
The property is currently included in the City draft HMP with a proposed “hardlin
s designation identifying the preservation of open space. The ownership has negotiatc
with the Wildlife Agencies and the City of Carlsbad and all have come to an agreeme
as to the “hardline” areas for development and designation of open space areas. TI
major open-space corridor is generally located along Aqua Hedionda Creek south
proposed Faraday Avenue alignment. Another large open-space area is tocated alor
the western and northern boundary adjacent to Dawson Los Monos Canyon Resew
These areas possess considerable biological significance as one of the few remainir
undisturbed riparian woodland systems in Southern California.
Planned Industrial (PI) and Open-Space (OS) land use designations surround tl
Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park property on the north, south and west sides. C
the east side of the project within the City of Vista lies existing single-family resident1
uses. The current General Plan designations for the property are PI and OS. TI
current zoning for the entire property is Planned Community (P-C)
Proiect Description
The proposed General Plan Amendment retains the property’s PI and OS Gene!
Plan land use designations, however, the land use boundaries are readjusted
correspond with the areas proposed for open space and industrial land use. TI
amendment would change from PI to OS the majority of the area south of the proposr
Faraday alignment. In addition, the PI designated areas north of Faraday have ber
reduced in size and the open-space increased. The proposed zone change rezonc
the PI designated property to Planned Industrial (P-M) and OS designated property
Open Space (0-S). Of the 414 acres, 219.5 acres (53%) are proposed as open-spac
167.3 gross acres for industrial use, 0.6 acres for a sewer lift station or open-space ai
26.6 acres of public street. Of the 167.3 gross acres of industrial, 129.8 acres will I
building pads.
The proposed Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park Specific Plan (SP No. 211) ai
accompanying documents will provide a comprehensive set of guidelines, regulatioi
and implementation program to ensure orderly development of the entire Carlsbi
Oaks North project. The Specific Plan defines the allowable types and intensity of us1
and provides detailed development and design standards and criteria. Adoption of tl
new Specific Plan will establish development criteria and standards in accordance wl
the City of Carlsbad General Plan, Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Carlsbi
Municipal Code; the Zone 16 Local Facilities Management Plan, the Palomar Airpc
Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan.
The proposed tentative subdivision map would create 22 industrial lots ranging in si
from 3 acres to 20.7 acres and 4 open space lots. Proposed grading is balanced w
April 2000Pagi
2385
w w
an estimated 2,660,000 cubic yards of cut and 2,660,000 cubic yards of fill necessa
for the Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park and onsite and offsite Faraday Avenu
The following discussion summarizes the proposed onsite and offsite Faraday Aveni
road, sewer facilities including the onsite and offsite South Agua Hedionda Sew(
Interceptor (SAHI), drainage facility improvements, and provision of open spac
necessary for the project:
Road Improvements
In addition to the standard industrial streets providing access to the individual parcel
vehicular access to the site requires: 1) the construction and dedication of Farad:
Avenue, a secondary arterial roadway, from the easterly project boundaries adjacent
the City of Vista westerly through the property to offsite of the Carlsbad Oaks Nor
Business Park property through County lands to Orion Street. (The County of S;
Diego has agreed to dedicate the right-of-way as part of the settlement agreement f
the trashkransfer station with the City of Carlsbad.); and 2) the construction of El Fuer
Street, a secondary arterial roadway, from its current northerly terminus northerly
Faraday Avenue. The developer will be responsible for the construction of the onsi
streets and El Fuerte along with his fair share cost of offsite Faraday west of tt
Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park property.
Sewer Facilities
Sewer service for Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park may include a phased approac
In addition to the single phase alternative, which relies on the availablity of the Sou
Agua Hedionda Sewer Interceptor, a two phase approach will be analyzed as part
the environmental study. The two phased approach is briefly described below.
Phase I
This phase would provide sewer service to generally the easterly half of the Oaks Nor
property. This sewer would gravity flow southerly to Faraday Avenue and then eastei
in Faraday Avenue into the City of Vista and into the Raceway Basin Lift Station. TI
Raceway Basin Lift Station will need to be upgraded to accommodate the flows on i
interim basis from Phase I of Carlsbad Oaks North. This is an interim sew
configuration and it will require a sewer service agreement between the City
Carlsbad and the Buena Sanitation District. Buena Sanitation District has indicated th
they may be supportive of this option as an interim solution for sewer service for Pha!
I.
2385
April 2000~agf
w w
Phase WOption 1
This phase would delete the interim connection (Phase I) to the Raceway Basin L
Station. The gravity line in Faraday Avenue that flows east for Phase I would I:
replaced with a line that flows west to the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor. If the ne
South Agua Hedionda Interceptor has not been constructed to Faraday Avenue whe
Phase II is ready to be constructed, then Phase IVOption 2 will be constructed.
Phase IVOption 2
This phase abandons the use of the Raceway Basin Lift Station and utilizes a gravi
system to a new pump station near El Fuerte and Faraday Ave within Lot No. 25. Tt
east flowing gravity line in Faraday Ave. would be replaced with a west flowing gravi
line to the new pump station. A force main will then be constructed partially in Farad;
Ave. and then southwesterly in the existing Buena Interceptor easement across Coun
of San Diego property to El Camino Real just north of Palomar Airport Road. Tt
system would then continue southerly in El Camino Real to the Vallecitos Interceptor
the south edge of the Carlsbad Industrial area.
Drainaqe Facilities
All graded lots within Carlsbad Oaks North will be graded to direct flows into an onsi
temporary desiltation basin and then directly into an underground system. The majc
onsite drainage system flows underground to Faraday Ave. and into two separa
pollution control basins prior to discharging into Aqua Hedionda Creek.
When Aqua Hedionda Creek crosses under Faraday Ave., a maj,
detentionhedimentation facility will be created (see Drainage Report from Ric
Engineering, dated June 30, 1998). The City Master Drainage Plan identified sever
storm drains, and storm drain systems that were constructed with the original Carlsbz
Oaks project. The Drainage Master Plan (1994) also requires a major sedimentatic
basin (BP/59,150 cubic yards) to be constructed offsite on the adjacent County of Sz
Diego property at the confluence of Aqua Hedionda Creek and a minor tributary with
the County property. The basin being proposed at Faraday Ave. may replace BP
found to satisfy the need and requirements of the Drainage Master Plan.. In additio
the Drainage Master Plan cost estimate includes a provision for a potential bridc
structure (Paragraph BP on page 83) on Faraday Ave. across Aqua Hedionda Cree
The Carlsbad Oaks North project is proposing an undersized crossing (a single bc
culvert as identified in the Rick Engineering Hydrology Study not only for drainas
improvements but also for detention of the 100 year flood to protect downstrea
property) that will negate the need for a bridge structure.
2385
April 2000~age
- I-
The Specific Plan addresses proposed site drainage and issues associated with projei
runoff and Agua Hedionda Creek. All graded lots within the project site will be grade
to direct drainage into an onsite temporary desiltation basin and then directly into a
underground system that either connects to the major onsite drainage system or i
some cases of small drainage area, into a rock dissipater and then to a naturi
drainage swale. The primary onsite system will extend within internal streets and offsii
via Faraday Avenue and eventually into two (maybe more) separate pollution contrc
basins as required prior to discharging into Agua Hedionda Creek. The two (possib
more) pollution control basins are required to be constructed on the site by the Ci
Master Drainage Plan and as a filter to meet NPDES standards.
The discussion of drainage facilities proposed by the Specific Plan as well as
hydrologic analysis of the proposed detention facilities prepared by Rick Engineerir
will serve as the basis for this description.
Open Space
Preservation of open space and particularly the large open space habitat corridor whic
is part of the City’s HMP and wraps around the Specific Plan area from the northwest i
the southeast, is an important aspect of the Specific Plan. Open space constitutes tt=
largest single land use and much of the Specific Pian open space is in the larc
continuous habitat corridor. Other proposed open space areas include employe
eating areas, a pedestrian trail with related PAR course equipment, landscape setback
and slope areas. All designated open spaces are to be maintained by the Carlsbz
Oaks North Business Park Association. Four open space categories are addresse
within the Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park Specific Plan area.
1. Open Space for Preservation of Natural Resources
The large open space habitat corridor, proposed to be preserved as part of the City
HMP, wraps around the Specific Plan area and consists of 219.5 acres of dedicate
open space (53% of the site). This area includes the preservation of Agua Hedionc
Creek as a significant and important environmental and aesthetic resource and a 30
buffer on the north side adjacent to the Los Monos Canyon Reserve.
2. Open Space for the Managed Production of Resources
The project site has not recently been used for agriculture purposes or mined fi
mineral reasons. No portion of the specific plan will be reserved for the production 1
such resources.
2385.
April 2000~age
W w
3.
1.2 miles (6400 lineal feet) of pedestrian trail with areas for related PAR cours
equipment and 0.8 acres of private recreation facilitieslemployee eating areas ai
proposed.
Open Space for Outdoor Recreation
4.
The project consists of a limited amount of manufactured slopes to be maintained i
open space. 50' landscaped setbacks along El Fuerte and Faraday and a 3
landscape setback along the loop road are also proposed. Landscaping of the!
setbacks will provide an aesthetically pleasing thoroughfare as well as providir
additional distance between the travel lane and future buildings. In addition,
significant landscape setback is being proposed on the easterly edge of the proje
adjacent to the existing residential uses in the City of Vista.
Open Space for Public Health and Safety
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The following studies and pertinent information are available for review and use in tl
preparation of this Environmental Impact Report.
It should be noted that some of the studies/reports below prepared for tl
proposed project may have been revised/amended, or may incluc
addendahpdates since original publication. In such cases, the Consultant shi
use the IatestYmost correct information available.
1.
2.
3.
The following technical studies prepared for the project along with those to be prepared by tl
consultant will serve as the basis for the environmental analysis in the EIR:
Carlsbad Oaks North Specific Plan, Prepared by O'Day Consultants, January 1999.
Draft Environmental Information for Carlsbad Oaks. Prepared by RECON, 1981.
Review of the Cultural Resources of Carlsbad Oaks. Prepared by RECON, 1977.
Faraday Extension Biological Resources and Wetland Delineation Repo
prepared by Dudek & Associates dated August 1999 -
2385
April 2000~age
- w
“Existing ConditionslBiologicaI Resources & Wetland Delineation Report I
Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, C
prepared by Dudek dated 12-9-97. (This document does not include an analy:
of impacts with recommended mitigation).
“Existing Conditions/BiologicaI Resources and Wetlands Delineation Report 1
Sewer Extension, Carlsbad Oaks North, City of Carlsbad, San Diego Coun
CA prepared by Dudek dated January 4,. 2000. (This document does not inclui an analysis of impacts with recommended mitigation).
Rancho Carlsbad and Basin Project, Rick Engineering dated June 30, 1998
Offsite Faraday alternative alignment studies (“A”, “B”, and “C) prepared
O’Day Consultants revised April 6, 1998 .
Colored Sewer phasing alternatives for Carlsbad Oaks North (onsite on1
prepared by O’Day Consultants, revised February 8, 2000.
“Preliminary Drainage Study for Carlsbad Oaks North” (onsite only), prepar
by O’Day Consultants dated July 3, 1997.
“Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for the Proposed Carlsbad Oaks Ea
Carlsbad, CA,” prepared by Woodward Clyde Consultants dated June 15, 199C
Geotechnical Analysis Update, prepared by Geocon dated January 4, 2000
“Hydrology and Hydraulic Studies for Carlsbad Oaks North Business Par
prepared by Howard H. Chang dated April 1997.
Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by WI
Engineering dated August 7, 1997 and a draft “Circulation Facility - Loc
Facility Management Plan Zone 16” dated February 27, 1991.
New WPA traffic analysis being prepared (to be completed in 8 - 10 weeks frc
March 2, 2000)
“Comprehensive Land Use Plan - McClellan-Palomar Airport, Carlsbad, (
adopted April, 1994.
Zone 16 LFMP dated February, 1992
Airport Approach Zone
238!
April 2000~agl
w w
CONSULTANT SERVICES
The consultant shall prepare a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Carlsbad Oa
North Business Park Specific Plan and related applications which is acceptable to the City. TI
Program EIR shall be prepared pursuant to all applicable state laws and shall conform to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and State EIR guidelines particularly Sectic
151 68 (Program EIR). The following topics shall be analyzed:
1. Air Quality
2. Archeological and Paleontological Resources
3. Biological Resources
4. TraffidCirculation
5. Land Use Compatibility
6. Noise
7. Public Services/Utilities
8. Solid Waste
9. Visual AesthetidGrading
IO. Water Quality/Hydrology
11. Population/Housing
12. Hazards
13. Geology/SoiIs
14. Cumulative Impacts
15. Growth Inducement
16. Alternatives
The consultant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of a
information contained in the Final Draft EIR. If the Consultant does not wish 1
accept responsibility for the information contained in the technical studies, th
Consultant shall provide to the City Statements signed by the approprial
technical consultant accepting responsibility for the accuracy and completenes
of any studies/reporfs prepared by that technical consultant. These signe
statements of responsibility shall be made a part of the appendices of the EIR.
The Consultant shall:
1) Obtain all reference material and conduct all research and field data collectio
necessary to prepare the Program EIR.
23854
April 2000~age :
w m
2) Identify, discuss and develop appropriate mitigation monitoring programs for a
impacts which may be associated with the short-term and/or long-term development
the site.
Provide ten (IO) screencheck draft documents for city staff review which will I
consistent with CEQA and the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19
the Carlsbad Municipal Code) within ten weeks from entering into the agreement wi
the City.
Within fifteen (15) weeks of entering into agreement with the City, provide ten (1
copies of the revised Draft Program EIR text, including appendices and exhibits, whic
incorporate staff's written recommendations and revisions to the screencheck Draft Ell
in addition to the first draft of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ai
Candidate Findings of Fact.
Provide fifty-one (51) copies of the City-approved Draft EIR with appendices, exhibil and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Twenty-five (25) of those copic
shall be in 3-ring, loose-leaf binders, and twenty-five (25) shall be spiral-bound copie
One copy shall be an unbound reproducible copy.
Respond to comments made during the Draft Program EIR public review period. With
three weeks after the close of the public review period, consultant shall submit writte
responses to comments and provide ten (IO) screencheck Final Program El
documents which include all comments on the Draft EIR. In addition, ten (IO) copies I
the Candidate Findings of Fact incorporating staffs comments shall be submitted.
Provide ten (IO) copies of the Final Draft EIR, including appendices and exhibits, whic
shall incorporate staffs written recommendations and revisions to the screencheck Fin
EIR, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and a separate submittal consistir
of the Candidate Findings of Fact.
Provide fifty-one (51) copies of the City-approved Final Program EIR with appendice
and exhibits. Twenty-five (25) of those copies shall be in 3-ring, loose-leaf binders, an
twenty-five (25) shall be spiral-bound copies. One copy shall be an unboun
reproducible copy.
Attend up to ten (1 1) meetings, including but not limited to:
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
0
0
one (I) public scoping meeting
two (2) meetings with staff to discuss issues regarding the preparation of th
two (2) meetings with staff to review comments on the screencheck draft.
screencheck draft.
a
2385-6
April 2000~age z
w m
0 two (2) -meetings with staff to review responses to public comments and the fin
up to four (4) public hearings with presentations as necessary as determined I
draft.
City staff.
0
INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The introductory chapter and executive summary is a required section under CEQA. Th section should provide sufficient detail to evaluate and review the environmental impacts of tt-
project, but not excessive detail. It may be used as a "stand alone" document.
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall prepare an introductory chapter and executive summary pursuai
to all applicable CEQA requirements. This section should identify the project locatic
and boundaries on detailed regional maps. It should include a general description of th
project's technical, economic, and environmental characteristics. It should include
statement briefly describing the intended uses of the EIR. Since this is a Program EIF
this would include future projects which would implement the Specific Plan. It shoul
also list the agencies which are expected to use the EIR in their decision-making an
the approvals for which the EIR will be used. This section must itemize and discus
briefly each significant effect of the project, as well as proposed mitigation measure
required and alternatives which would reduce or avoid that impact. It should identii
areas of controversy and issues raised by agencies or the public. Issues which woul
remain to be resolved should be called out, including the choices among alternative and whether or how to mitigate the significant impacts.
The EIR shall comprehensively address and analyze the scope of issues identified anc
described below:
AIR QUALIN
Proiect Backaround
Implementation of the proposed project will result in an incremental increase in local ant
regional air pollution. Grading for the project may also contribute significantly to the generatioi
of fugitive dust. The San Diego Air Basin is classified as a "severe" non-attainment area fc
both federal and state standards for ozone (smog). The San Diego Air Basin also exceeds thl
state standard for airborne particulate matter.
2385-0
April 2000~age 2
W m
Impacts from the project may include construction emissions, equipment exhaust, fugitive du!
and vehicle emissions. The project's impact may be significant as the region presently does n
meet air quality standards. Additional mitigation measures may be necessary such as providir
for public transit in the project design and implementation of various Transportation Contt
Measures (TCMs) to reduce trips, vehicle use, miles traveled, idling or traffic congestion.
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall discuss the project setting, including a review of the region:
meteorology. The consultant shall review and address both short-term and long-term :
quality impacts of the project. The analysis should include consideration of any potenti
emissions or other hazardous conditions resulting from the planned industrial portion of tt
project. Recommended analysis to determine emissions resulting from the project m;
include:
a)
b) Calculations of air quality impacts and emissions during construction ar
Provision of a summary of required emissions data;
operation of the project; and,
Modeling of air quality impacts, including modeling of ambient air quality. c)
2. Air quality impacts shall be analyzed in regard to the following:
a)
b) GradingBlasting and Construction
d)
Project emissions from vehicular and stationary sources
Compliance with federal and state standards as well as regional air quali
attainment plans.
3. The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify ar
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from the projec
recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identify any impac
remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES
The project site has the potential to contain archaeological and paleontological resources. Tb
1977 cultural resources evaluation prepared by RECON identified cultural resources sites withi
2385-
April 2000~age
w e
s the project boundaries. However, the methods utilized in 1977 were less intensive th;
currently required by the City.. The consultant shall prepare cultural resource reports for tt
Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park project, the alternative alignments of onsite and offsi
Faraday Avenue and the onsite and offsite SAHI sewer line.
In addition, areas of the project site consist of soil formations which have a high potential
contain fossils. Mass grading required for development .of the proposed project may result in
potentially significant impacts to paleontological resources. These impacts may be mitigated 1
below a level of significance by incorporation of a monitoring program and collection of fossils,
any are identified during cutting.
The cultural resources report prepared by the consultant will be utilized as the basis for tt cultural resources and paleontological resources section of the EIR and will address tt
following tasks:
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall prepare a cultural resources report for the Carlsbad Oaks Nod
Business Park project, onsite and offsite alternative alignments of Faraday Avenue and th
SAHI sewer.
2. The consultant shall demonstrate that the minimum qualifications for Cultural Resourc
Professionals required by the "City of Carlsbad Cultural Resource Guidelines" date
December 1990 are met. The consultant shall ensure that cultural resource reports consi!
of the following:
A literature review and record search for the property shalU be completed.
A field survey of proposed development areas to identify archaeological sites sh2
be completed.
Testing of any sites identified shall be completed in conformance with the City'
Guidelines to determine significance.
0 Evaluation of the site with respect to soil types known to contain possibli
paleontological resources. These areas shall be surveyed and mitigated if founl
significant. The City has a standard two phased program which is required to bl
undertaken to avoid possible significant impacts on paleontological resources.
3. All field work, research, report preparation and determinations of significance shall be don1
in accordance with the requirements of the "City of Carlsbad Cultural Resource Guideline5
dated December 1990.
2385-0
April 2000~age 2
w 0
4. The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify an
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from the projeci
recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identify any impact
remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Project Backqround
Impacts to biological resources could occur with implementation of the project. Biologic2
resources and wetland delineation reports for the proposed Carlsbad Oaks North project, tht
offsite Faraday Avenue extension, and offsite SAHl sewer line prepared by Dudek t
Associates, Inc. (which contain no impact analysis or mitigation proposals) have been prepared
Additional biological surveys and reports shall be prepared by the consultant as detailed below
The combination of biological surveys and wetland delineation conducted by the consultant anr
Dudek & Associates will serve as the basis for the Biological Resources section of the EIR
Mitigation for offsite SAHl and Faraday Avenue may be proposed in an appropriate offsitc
habitat mitigation bank, or if no other mitigation bank is available, the City’s ,mitigation bank a
Lake Calavera (if appropriate) may be considered as an option. The biological resource!
section will address the following tasks:
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall conduct the following biological surveys and wetland delineation:
0 Reconnaissance biological surveys of Faraday Avenue alternative alignments from Orion tc
Carlsbad City limits.
Reconnaissance level wetland delineation for Carlsbad Oaks North Busniess Park including
Faraday Avenue and the proposed onsite SAHl sewer line from Carlsbad City limits at thc
eastern property boundary through open space to the western boundary of the Tchans
property, offsite Faraday Avenue alternative alignments, and offsite SAHl alternativc
alignments.
Focused sensitive species surveys for Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park including onsitc
and offsite Faraday Avenue alternative alignments, and onsite and offsite SAHI sewer line
alternative alignments.
Reconnaissance level surveys of wetland vegetation on the Carlsbad Oaks North site as
well as that associated with offsite roadway and sewer line improvements.
2. Document existing conditions and identify project impacts and mitigation measures for
Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park as well as proposed alternative alignments of the
0
2385-01
April 2000~age 21
w 0
onsite and offsite extension of Faraday Avenue and onsite and offsite SAHl sewer lin
The existing conditions data base will consist of project-level vegetation mapping,
summary of focused surveys for the federally-listed threatened California Gnatcatch
and least Bell’s Vireo conducted for the project in 1996 and current focused surveys f
the California Gnatcatcher, least Bell’s Vireo, and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher, ai
anecdotal observations of other sensitive species including the Narrow Endemi
required by the Habitat Management Plan, to be conducted for the Carlsbad Oal
North Business Park project site, onsite and offsite Faraday Avenue extension, and tt
onsite and offsite SAHI sewer line.
3. Utilizing current surveys conducted by the consultant and the wetland delineation studic
performed by Dudek and Associates for Carlsbad Oaks North, offsite Faraday extensic
and the SAHI sewer, a formal wetland delineation shall be completed in accordance with tl
requirements of the ACOE. The results of the wetland delineation will be incorporated in
the EIR and biological resources report.
4. The Consultant shall evaluate the proposed project for compliance with the approvc
Habitat Management Plan and required implementation and mitigation measures.
5. Indirect impacts such as light, glare, noise and construction resulting from implementatic
of the Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park Specific Plan on the HMP preserve areas ar
Los Monos Canyon Reserve shall be analyzed.
6. The report shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify any significa
and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from the project; recommer
appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identify any impacts remainir after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
TRAFF IC/CI RCU LATlON
P roiect Bac ka rou n d
The industrial land uses proposed by the project will generate traffic both on and offsite an
have a corresponding change in the amount of traffic generated at these locations. Th
proposed scope of the project has the potential to have traffic impacts on areas outside the Cil
of Carlsbad. As a result, a traffic analysis is required to evaluate the impacts of the propose
project. WPA Engineering is currently preparing a traffic analysis for the proposed project th;
will serve as the basis for this section of the EIR. Third party review of the traffic analyses w
be conducted by the City’s consultant, Susan 0-Rourke, to ensure that it is consistent with th
City’s draft “Scope of Work for Traffic Impact Report” which is being utilized by major projects I
the vicinity of the project. The above mentioned “Scope of Work for Traffic Impact Report“ I
attached.
23854
April 2000~age :
w 8
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall assemble the findings and proposed mitigation (i.e., identify t
criteria used to determine significance; identify any significant and less than significa
direct and indirect, impacts resulting from the project; identify mitigation measures i
may be required; and, identify any impacts remaining after implementation of tl
recommended mitigation measures) of the traffic analyses prepared by WPA whit
includes an analysis of the regional and cumulative impacts of the project includii
offsite extension of Faraday Avenue and a Congestion Management Plan.
Note: Congestion management measures, such as carpooling, flex hours, et1
proposed to mitigate traffic impacts should be evaluated to determine wheth enforcement provisions are included.
The components of the traffidcirculation analysis should include vehicular traffic, pub
transportation, bike and pedestrian traffic, and parking. An evaluation of the pedestril
and bicycle circulation system for potential hazards shall also be completed.
The consultant's analysis should make a determination as to the provision of adequa
access to adjacent properties in compliance with City of Carlsbad access requirements
2.
3.
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
Proiect Backaround
The Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park project including offsite Faraday Avenue and the SA1
sewer requires a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Plan, Tentative Ma
Hillside Development Permit, and a Special Use Permit. The City's draft Habitat Managemei
Plan (HMP) for the property has established the areas to be preserved and those areas whic may be developed. The General Plan Amendment and the Zone Change proposed as a part (
the project would involve modifications to the existing land use and zoning designations 1
reflect the increased areas of open space and the reduction in planned industrial categork
necessary to accommodate the HMP preserve boundaries.
Land uses adjacent to the project site include residential, industrial and vacant land. Existir
residential uses are located immediately to the east of the site within the City of Vista. Existir industrial and business park uses are located to the south of the site. Vacant land immediate
borders the site to the west and north with business park and residential uses in the proje
vicinity to the east of the site. The proposed offsite Faraday Avenue extension and SAHl sewc
pipeline would extend to the west and north through areas characterized by vacant lanc
agricultural land, and single family residential areas.
23854
April 2000~age :
w 0
The project is within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan Palomar Airport. A portion of tt
property falls within the Airport Flight Activity zone. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUf
for the airport contains requirements in regard to land use compatibility, noise impacts, ar
height restrictions.
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall describe the environmental setting of the project. This will include
discussion of any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the City's adopte
General Plan and zoning, and any applicable regional plans. The consultant sh;
examine the existing physical conditions as well as the potential future conditions.
2. The consultant shall perform a detailed project review to confirm the project
compliance with City ordinances and policies. The ordinances and policies shall includc
(a) the City of Carlsbad General Plan, (b) the Habitat Management Plan, (c) tb Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for McClellan-Palomar Airport, (d) the Carlsbs Zoning Ordinance (Title 21) including the Planned Industrial and Open Space Zone:
Hillside Development Regulations, Floodplain Regulations, and Growth Managemer
Chapter, (e) Landscape ManuaVFire Suppression, (9 Open Space and Conservatio
Resource Management Plan, (9) and Subdivision Regulations (Title 21)).
3. The consultant shall analyze the land use compatibility between the propose
development and surrounding residential development particularly areas of speck
concern such as existing residential uses located immediately to the east of the site.
4. The consultant shall analyze the land use compatibility between the propose
development and the Los Monos Canyon Reserve.
The consultant shall analyze the impacts of the proposed General Plan Amendmen
Specific Plan and related applications on the subject site. 5.
6. The consultant shall analyze the project's compatibility with McClellan-Palomar Airport ir
terms of proposed !and uses, noise and height restrictions.
7. The consultant shall analyze the adequacy of provisions in the Specific Plan fo
commercial services and recreational opportunities to serve the needs of futurc
employees and the impacts to surrounding development associated with an!
inadequacies.
The consultant shall address compatibility issues associated with construction of thc
offsite sewer line. Issues associated with the sewer line include proximity to sensitivc
receptors, odor impacts, construction impacts, and consistency with environmental goal:
of the City of Carlsbad General Plan and HMP.
8.
2385-0
April 2000~age 3:
w 0
9. The consultant shall address compatibility issues associated with the construction
onsite and offsite Faraday Avenue. Issues associated with the roadway include proximi
to sensitive receptors, construction impacts including a possible rock crushing operatio
and consistency with environmental goals of the City of Carlsbad General Plan and HMI
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify ar
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from the
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identii
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
10.
NOISE
Proiect Backaround
The project site is currently subject to noise impacts from Palomar Airport Road and activities l
the nearby McClellan-Palomar Airport. Increases in air traffic as well as automobile traff
volumes in the area resulting from the extension of Faraday Avenue and El Fuerte Street, WI
add incremental noise. Noise associated with construction of the Carlsbad Oaks Nort
Business Park as well as the onsite and offsite SAHI sewer and Faraday Avenue (which ma
require blasting and a rock crushing operation) will impact sensitive receptors in the are;
Implementation of the project will generate additional noise due to industrial operations an
outdoor mechanical equipment. Sensitive receptors onsite and offsite include futur
employees, existing single-family residences located immediately to the east of the site, an
wildlife corridors to the north, south, and west including the Los Monos Canyon Reserve.
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall prepare an acoustical analysis for the Carlsbad Oaks Nort
Business Park including onsite and offsite Faraday Avenue and the SAHI sewer. Thc noise study shall analyze the existing and future noise environment of the project site
The analysis shall include both exterior and interior noise impacts. The analysis sha determine the need for any exterior or interior mitigation measures to provide adequatc
protection to receptors from noise levels associated with the ideptified noise sources
The study shall be performed in accordance with the methodological requirements of thc
Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual.
The policies of the Noise Element of the General -Plan shall be consulted to assurc
proposed mitigation measures do not conflict with the Genera0 Plan.
The McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) shall also bc
reviewed to determine whether the identified noise levels and proposed land uses will be
2.
3.
2385-0
April 2000Page 3:
w oi
compatible and what additional requirements of the CLUP shall be imposed on t
project.
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify a
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from t
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identi
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
4.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES
Proiect Backaround
The proposed project includes a Specific Plan that addresses public facilities necessary serve the Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park project. The proposed sewer alternativr
include service provision by the Vista Sanitation District on an interim basis and the City
Carlsbad. The Public Facilities Element of the Specific Plan and amendment to the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan will serve as the basis for this section and addresses tt
following tasks:
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall describe the project setting and shall determine the demands of tt
entire project for the following: (a) water; (b) reclaimed water, (c) sewer; (d) sew1
treatment capacity; (e) drainage facilities; (9 gas and electric services; (9) schools; (1
parks; (i) police services; and (j) fire protection.
The consultant shall determine the ability of the agencies providing the services in itet
number 1 above to meet the demands of the proposed project in order to conclud whether a significant impact will be created.
The emergency. response plans of the City of Carlsbad shall be analyzed in conjunctia
with the proposed project to determine if the project will interfere with existing plans.
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify ar significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from th
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identt
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
2.
3.
4.
23854
April 2000~age :
w e
SOLID WASTE
Proiect Background
The development of the project may contribute to significant cumulative impacts to solid was
generation and disposal.
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall determine the solid waste volumes generated and methods
disposal, to include composting and recycling, for both construction and maintenance
the project.
The consultant shall evaluate available landfill capacity.
The consultant shall recommend mitigation to ensure that the cumulative impacts
solid waste disposal comply with the goals of the California Integrated Was
Management Act of 1989 (A.B. 939).
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify ar
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from tt
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identi
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
2.
3.
4.
VISUAL AESlHETICS/GRADING
Proiect Background
The project site contains large variations in elevation because of the existing landforms whic
include canyons and steep slopes. Large volumes of grading are proposed to develop the sit
In addition, grading is to occur in phases as described in the Specific Plan. Potential visu
impacts associated with cut and fill slopes in the hillside topography due to the ccnstruction (
streets and building pads, and the eventual construction of buildings, has the possibility (
creating significant grading/landform and aesthetic impacts.
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall analyze the proposed landform alteration for compliance with th
City’s Hillside Development Ordinance and Landscape Guidelines.
2385-1
April 2000~age
W W
2. The consultant shall review the development standards of the proposed Specific Plan
determine if the standards for unit placement, architecture, and building height alo
ridgelines and other highly visible locations will allow structures to be built that WOI
have a significant negative visual impact.
An evaluation of the aesthetic impacts associated with the proposed phasing of gradi
particularly with stockpile and borrow sites shall be completed.
The proposed grading phases shall be evaluated for ways to ensure minimal impacts surrounding areas.
Visual simulations of each proposed grading phase as well as the completed fir
graded project shall be prepared and evaluated.
Visual simulations depicting the proposed maximum building heights and land u
intensity permissible by the specific plan shown on the proposed final grades shall al
be prepared.
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify a
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from t
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, ideni
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
WA TER QUA LlTY/H YDROLOG Y
The Specific Plan addresses proposed site drainage and issues associated with project run and Agua Hedionda Creek. All graded lots within the project site will be graded to din
drainage into an onsite temporary desiltation basin and then directly into an undergrou
system that either connects to the major onsite drainage system or in some cases of sm
drainage area, into a rock dissipater and then to a natural drainage swale. The primary ons
system will extend within internal streets and offsite via Faraday Avenue and eventually into t~
separate pollution control basins required prior to discharging into Agua Hedionda Creek. T
two pollution control basins ars required to be constructed on the site by the City Mas
Drainage Plan and as a filter to meet NPDES standards. The City has recently studied t
drainage basin as part of an overall flood control project related to the Rancho Carlsbad Mot: Home Park downstream of the proposed project. The results of the City’s drainage study
well as the necessary modifications and flood control facilities need to be incorporated into t
project.
238:
April 2000~agi
w w
The discussion of drainage facilities proposed by the Specific Plan as well as a hydrolo!
analysis of the proposed detention facilities prepared by Rick Engineering will serve as t
basis for this section and will address the following tasks:
Tasks:
1. Using available data, the consultant shall describe the hydrological setting (existi hydrological conditions) of the site and general drainage characteristics. A discussion
existing water quality, based on available RWQCB data for the project, shall also
included in the EIR.
The consultant shall evaluate the proposed drainage systems adequacy in regulati
the discharge rates of drainage from the project site.
The consultant shall evaluate the degree to which the project will alter existing draina
patterns to determine if a significant impact will be created.
2.
3.
4. The consultant shall address and recommend appropriate mitigation measures
reduce erosion potential onsite.
The consultant shall analyze and evaluate the potential impacts to the Agua Hedion
and Los Monos Creeks and Agua Hedionda Lagoon resulting from the implementati
of the project including construction of the onsite and offsite Faraday Avenue and t
SAHl sewer.
The consultant shall evaluate the proposed project for National Pollutant Dischar
Elimination System permit compliance. The basin(s) size and a maintenance progK
shall be addressed.
The consultant shall evaluate the proposed project for impacts to wetlands.
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify a
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from t
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, idenl
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measurss
5.
6.
7.
8.
238!
April 2000~ag
w W
POPULA TION/HOUSING
Proiect Backaround
The project proposes development of industrial uses. Development of other property in tl area may be induced by development of the project.
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall analyze the proposal to determine if it will induce substantial grou
in the area either directly or indirectly.
The consultant shall analyze for conformance with the General Plan Housing Elerne
the impact associated with the demand for housing affordable to low and moderz
income groups resulting from the creation of new low and/or moderate wage jobs.
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify a
significant 'and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from tl
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, ident
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures
2.
3.
HAZARDS
Proiect Backaround
Given the site's proximity to natural vegetation, the Agua Hedionda Creek, and the Flit
Activity Zone for the airport, the project has the potential to be impacted by a number I
different types of hazards. They include natural hazards such as floodplains, high fire haz:
areas, and airplane crashes. Additionally, implementation of the project has the potential
impact surrounding uses due to the accidental release of hazardous materials. These potent
hazards as they relate to the project require analysis to determine if project approval would F persons and property at an unacceptable risk.
2381
April 2000~agi
w W
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall evaluate all available floodplain mapping and source documents
determine the boundaries of the floodplain as they apply to the project site. Grac
alterations proposed by the development shall be reviewed to determine their impact c
the floodplain. The consultant shall also review the City of Carlsbad Floodpla
Regulations to determine if the project is 'in compliance with the requirements contain€
within the ordinance.
The consultant shall identify and analyze the significance of any impacts to surroundir
land uses that could occur due to the accidental release of hazardous materials fro
industrial uses and recommend necessary mitigation measures.
The consultant shall identify the areas of the project site which are considered to be his
fire hazard areas. The City's Fire Marshal shall be consulted as to the acceptability
proposed development sites adjacent to high fire hazard areas as well as possib
mitigation measures needed to reach an acceptable level of safety.
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify ar
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from tt
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identi
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
2.
3.
4.
GEOLOGY/SOILS
Proiect Background
A variety of soil conditions exist on the project site. A geotechnical analysis prepared t
Geocon for Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park and offsite Faraday and a consultant prepare
geotechnical analysis prepared for the onsite and offsite SAHl sewer will serve as the basis fi
this section which will address the following tasks:
Tasks:
1. The consultant shall prepare an environmental site assessment evaluating the absent
or presence of hazardous materials.
2385
April 2000~age
w W
2. The consultant shall prepare a geotechnical investigation report including research, fie
studies, laboratory testing, and geotechnical analysis for the offsite SAHI sewer lii
alternatives and/or review current soils reports prepared by Geocon for the project.
The consultant shall describe the geological setting, including existing soil and geoloc
conditions. The EIR shall include an evaluation of the adequacy of the site for tl
proposed development, particularly with regard to unstable soils, landslides, rocky soi
fault rupture, seismic ground shaking, subsidence, settlement, surcharging, liquefactic
and groundwater impacts.
The consultant shall also evaluate the need for blasting. The environmental impac
such operations would have particularly on adjacent developed properties and/
environmentally sensitive habitat areas should be discussed under the noise, biologic
resources, and land use compatibility sections.
5. The consultant shall also evaluate the need for a rock crushing operation. TI environmental impacts such operations would have particularly on adjacent develop(
properties and/or environmentally sensitive habitat areas should be discussed under ti
noise, biological resources, and land use compatibility sections.
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify a
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from tl
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, ident
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures
3.
4.
6.
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The development of the proposed project may lead to several cumulative impacts which ne
to be addressed. These cumulative impacts may include, but may not be limited to: ( degradation of air quality; (b) increased traffic congestion; (c) increased requirements for pub
facilities/utilities; (d) habitat loss; and (e) increased demand for affordable housing.
Tasks:
1. As required by CEQA, the EIR shall address cumulative impacts for the propos
project. This shall include an identification of past, present, and reasonably anticipat future projects producing related or cumulative impacts, and shall include a summary
the environmental impacts expected to result from those' projects. It should contain
analysis of the cumulative impacts of relevant projects and any reasonable options '
mitigating or avoiding any significant cumulative impacts of the proposed project.
238:
April 2000~agi
w w
2. The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify ar
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from projec
recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identify ar
impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
GROWTH INDUCEMENT
The proposed development will require the construction of new major public facilities such i
Faraday Avenue, El Fuerte , and the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor sewer line.
Tasks:
1. As required by CEQA, the EIR shall address the impacts of growth inducement create
by the proposed project.
The consultant shall identify the criteria used to determine significance; identify ai
significant and less than significant, direct and indirect, impacts resulting from tt
project; recommend appropriate mitigation measures as may be required; and, identi
any impacts remaining after implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
2.
ALTERNATIVES
As required by CEQA, the consultant shall analyze various project alternatives and provide i
assessment of the potential impacts associated with each alternative. The consultant sh'
include in the EIR some discussion of why each of the selected alternatives was chosen f
analysis. The consultant shall provide a listing of the environmental advantages ai
disadvantages of each alternative. The alternatives shall include the following:
1. Proiect Alternative 1 - "No Proiect" Alternative - This alternative shall analyze tl
impacts associated with no development on the entire site.
Proiect Alternative 2 - "Environmentallv Superior/Reduced ImDact Alternative" - Tt
alternative would be based on the results of a biology study to avoid sensitive habR
and/or wetland impacts. It should also analyze a project plan reducedlmodified
address potential land use compatibility impacts associated with the project's proxim
to the adjacent residential development to the east, the Los Monos Canyon Reserve
the north, and the Agua Hedionda Creek to the south.
2.
2385
April 2000~agf
w w
3. Proiect Alternative 3- "Alternative Sites Analvsis" - An EUR typically is required
analyze an offsite project alternative. However, for this EIR, staff has determined th
there is no remaining industrial land not developed or proposed for development
consider as a feasible offsite alternative location for the project.
Proiect Alternative 4 - "Alternatives Considered But Reiected" - This alternative consis
of the existing General Plan Land Use Designations for the property with building area
calculated based on deducting constrained lands identified in the Carlsbad Municip
Code. This alternative should be included but rejected because of the habitat impacts
would create.
4.
CEQA MANDATED SECTIONS
The consultant shall include all sections mandated by CEQA in the EIR.
FORMAT
The EIR document shall be prepared in conformance with the "Required Format and Conten
of an Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad".
2385
April 2000~age
w W
3. Final Design (PS&E)
The final design scope of work includes the roadway and the associated utilities. The fin
design actual scope of work could change based on the outcome of the EIR. The final desi!
scope of work does not include the South Agua Interceptor Sewer
3.1 Faraday Avenue Extension
7: Right-of-way documents
Right-of-way dedication plats will be prepared as required to support the City’s acquisition
right-of-way and slopekonstruction easements. Legal descriptions of the easements and rigt
of-way parcels will be provided.
2: Geotechnical Investigation
Our proposed scope of services to prepare the geotechnical investigation report will inch
research, field studies, laboratory testing, and geotechnical analysis. Our services will I
performed to provide a summary of the general geologic conditions, evaluate the geolog
hazards that may be associated with the site, provide a geotechnical assessment of the existii
conditions, and develop geotechnical recommendations for use during design and constructio
We will backfill all trenches and boring with native soils, however, we will not be responsible f
long-term maintenance of these borings as settlement of the backfill may occur.
3: Improvement Plan Preparation
Prepare plan and profile drawings in City of Carlsbad format at a scale of 1” = 40’ for the enti
alignment (approx. 7 sheets) in accordance with the approved preliminary design. TI
connections to the existing roads at east and west ends will be shown. Plans to incluc
horizontal control data for the centerline, curb data, and centerline profile. Horizontal laya
data and profiles for storm drains will be shown. Curb profiles will be shown as necessai
Street lighting will be included on the improvement plan sheets. Signage, striping and markin and erosion control plans will be provided on separate sheets. No traffic signals or traf
control plans are included in the project.
4: Grading Plan Preparation
Prepare a grading plan for the project at a scale of 1” = 40’. The grading plan will shc
finished contours, as well as spot elevations along the right-of-way line or as needed to defii
the finished grades. The plans will include the grading of the two detention basins shown (
the preliminary alignment study by O’Day Consultants.
2385
April 2000~age
W W
5: Drainage Study
Prepare a drainage study to support the design of the drainage facilities in the project. Vi
understand that a separate drainage study will be prepared by others for the area within tt
Tchang parcel Tentative Map. The drainage study for Faraday Avenue will incorporai
information supplied by others to address flows being discharged from the Chang developmei
and will not include an analysis of conditions within the Chang development. The information i
be supplied by the engineers for the Chang parcel will include an estimate of required storac
volume and inflow and oufflow hydrographs for the two detention basins. The design of tt
outlet works is to be supplied by others as part of the subdivision drainage calculations. Tt
study will utilize existing data from the County of San Diego the City’s Master Plan and othc
sources as provided by the City to obtain flow rates on the main channel of Agua Hedionc
Creek.
6: Landscape and Irrigation Plans
Landscape and irrigation plans will be provided for the roadway and all graded slopes. Are:
disturbed by construction will be revegetated.
7: Cost Esfimates
A cost estimate will be prepared and submitted with the 70% plan submittal. The estimate \r\i
include earthwork quantities. The estimate will then be updated with each subseque
submittal.
8: Processing
Plans will be submitted to the City for plan check at the 70%, 90% and 100% completion level
KHA will discuss comments with the City’s project manager and plan checkers as required
obtain approval of the design.
9: Geofechnical Review
The 90% complete plans will be reviewed by the Geotechnical Engineer. This effort will consi
of geotechnical review of the plans to verify the geotechnical recommendations have ber
properly incorporated into the project design. Specifically we propose to perform the following
Perform a geotechnical review of the project grading plans and grading specifications. Tt
Confirm recommended subdrains, slope buttresses, and other remedial measures a
Identify whether design information conflicts with the intent of the geotechnic
review will be perfsrmed to:
properly identified.
recommendations.
2385
April 2000~age
w - 70: Utility Coordination
The Kimley-Horn team will coordinate with affected utility companies in conformance with ti
Engineering Department Project Development Manual.
77: Schedule
The project schedule that was developed in the preliminary design phase will be updated on
monthly basis and submitted with each monthly progress report.
72: Cross-sections
One set of cross sections of the roadway prism will be prepared at 100-foot stations. Unle:
otherwise requested by the City, the cross sections will be provided with the 70% submittal.
73: Meetings
The Kimley-Horn team will attend up to eight monthly progress meetings at the City’s office
Each meeting will be documented by written minutes, which will distributed in draft form
meeting participants to allow comment and revision if required.
5.2 Associated Utilities
I. Sewer siphon. The Buena Sanitation District is requesting that their existing 1:
sanitary sewer siphon be relocated within the proposed Faraday Avenue. Tt
proposed sewer will connect to the existing sewer located at the city limits to tt.
existing sewer at the proposed Faraday Avenue crossing of the existing siphon for
total distance of approximately 5880 feet. The design effort includes plan an
profile sheets at a scale of 1”=40’ for the siphon as well as a separate siphon detz
sheet. The effort does not include any design within the City of Vista or outside t
the proposed Faraday Avenue right-of-way.
2. Local sewer serving the Tchang development. A sanitary sewer will be require
within the proposed Faraday Avenue to serve the proposed Tchang property. Th
City of Carlsbad will provide the approved sewer study with the design flows. Th
sewer will begin at the proposed eastern roadway and connect to the propose
South Agua Hedionda Sewer for a total length of approximately 2200 feet. Th
design effort includes 1”=40’ scale plan and profile sheets and a separate detz
sheet. The effort does not include any design outside of Faraday Avenue.
3. Domestic water line. A 12” PVC water line is proposed to be constructed withi
the proposed Faraday Avenue from Orion Avenue east to the city limits for a
approximate length of 7400 feet. The design effort includes 1 ”=40’ scale plan and
2385-1
April 2000~age 1
w e
profile sheets and associated details. The design will include appurtenances, fi
hydrants, and stub connection for the Tchang property. The City will provide desi:
flows and computer pipe system network analysis. This proposal assumes tt
water system is in a single pressure zone and that no pressure reducing facility M
be required.
4. Reclaimed water line. The proposed reclaimed water line will have the san
assumption and limits as the domestic water line and will be shown on the san
plan and profile sheet.
2385-
April 2000~age
. w m
Fee Schedule for Faraday Avenue Roadway Extention
Environmental Analysis, Permitting, Preliminary Design and
Final Design
14-Apr-00
Faraday Avenue EnvironmentaVPE
Task Total
Project Management $14,240
Biology Mapping and coordination $17,147
Cultural Resources MappinglCoord. $4,840 Traffic Analysis $7,320
Engineering Data Collection $1,680
Survey and Mapping $1 3,610
Design Criteria $3,536
$3,340
-* Drainwebetention Basin $20,400
Alternative Identification $29.000
$41.1 88 Alternative Analysis Initial Study $8,560
$68.046 EIR Portion $29.21 8 Environmental Permitting Meetings and Hearings $1 6,024
Total: $278,149
Expenses
Geotechnical MappinglCoord __ -
Office (6.15%) $8,530
Sub markup (10%) $1 0,944
Computer ($15/hr) $5,500
Plotting/Printing $7,000
Misc s $I,Ot)O
Subtotal Expenses $32,975
Subtotal Faraday Ave EnvironmentallPE $31 1,124
South Agua Hedionda Sewer EnvironmentaVPE
Task Total
Project Management $14,780
Field Survey $14,910
Geotechnical $35,807
System flows $3,120
Alternative Identification $50,880
I. k w W
Alternative Analysis $67,364
Stream Channel Hydraulic Study $12,520
B;ology $37,582
Initial Study $7,330
EIR Portion $43,924
Meeting and Presentations $1 3,696
Pre-Design Report $12,500
Permitting $1 5,320
QNQC $8,020
Subtotal $350,393
Direct Expenses
Cultural $1 2,640
Office Expense $8,708
Computer $7,035
Reproduction of Plans $1,500
Plots $1,500
Printing $1,500
Submarkup $1 7,315
Subtotal Direct Expense $38,558
Total South Agua Hedionda Sewer EnvironmentaUPE $388,951
Misc $1,000
Utilities Preliminary Engineering
Task Total
Project Management $3,619
Preliminary Design Sewer Siphon $1 0,780
Local Sewer $7,380
Domestic Water $7,380
Reclaimed Water $7,380
Meetings $6,040
Subtotal Preliminary Engineering $38,960
Hourly Rate
Direct Expenses
Office Expense $2,396
Computer $3,264
Reproduction of Plans $1,000
Plots $1,000
Printing $200
Misc $500
Subtotal Direct Expense $8,360
4< * w .. m
Total Utility Preliminary Engineering $50,939
EIR Development
Task Total
Project Management $16,840
Biology Mapping and coordination $22.1 68
$1 5.240 Cultural Resources MappingICoord. Traffic Analysis $5,820
GeologicaliHazard Assessment $6,220
Alternative Analysis $1 1,550
VisuaVGrading $1 1,800
tnitial Study $6,192
EIR $67,496
Environmental Permitting $1 1,482
Meetings and Hearings $1 1,350
Total: $1 86.1 58
Expenses
Office (6.1 5%) $5,775
Plotting/Printing $2,000
Misc $1.000
Sub markup (10%) $9,226
Computer ($1 5hr) $5,500
Subtotal Expenses $23,501
Total Development Environmental $209,659
Total EnvironmentalIPE Project Cost $960,672
Faraday Avenue Final Design
Task Total
Project Management $19,380
Right-of-way / easement plats $10,624
Legal Descriptions $2,848
Geotechnical Investigations $49,632
Set up pian sheets $890 $2,120 Title, notes, details
Storm Drain Design $12,870
Plan 8, Profile sheets (7 shts.) $31,940
Striping and Marking (4 shts.) $13,000
Erosion Control Plans (7 shts.) $9,510
ill, 7 v @
Grading plans (7 shts.) $36,570
Channel Design $1 1,585
Roadway Drainage Study $12,080
Coord. drainage wl subdivision eng $3,094
Detention Basin Design $33,800
Landscape and Irrigation $41,699
Cost Estimates, initial prep. $4,744
Cost Estimates, revise $4,744
Earthwork takeoff $8,200
Processing $1 5,357
Schedule $972
Utility Coordination $7,964
Cross Sections (computer generated) $10,180
Meetings $10,708 $1 1,290 QAlQC Specs $8,210
Total: $374.01 1
Expenses Mapping (1 "40' scale) $4,000 Office (6.15%) $17,671
Sub markup (10%) $8,668
Computer ($1 5hr) $18,000
PIottinglPrinting $12,000
Misc $1.000
Subtotal Expenses $61,339
Subtotal Final Design $435,350
Utilities Final Design Engineering
Task Total
Final Design
Sewer Siphon (1 0 Sheets) $33,950
Local Sewer (5 Sheets) $20,600
$29,920 Domestic Water (1 1 Sheets)
Reclaimed Water (part of water) $1 2,595
Cost Estimate $3,600
Meetings $6,040
Project Management $10,981
WQC $7,160
$128,946
Specifications $4,100
Subtotal Final Design
Direct Expenses Office Expense $7,255
Computer $1 2,468
Reproduction of Plans $5,000
Plots $1,500
‘re w 0 .
Printing $300
Misc $1.000
Subtotal Direct Expense $27,523
Total Utility Final Design $1 56,469
Total Final Design $591,819
P:wIARKET. l~G\MKT\99-xxxs\9407~[f~m~~.xls)Sh~tl