HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-10-06; City Council; 268; Policy Statement Requiring Annexation - LAFCOTHE CZTY OF CAR L S B A D, C A L I F'O R N I A
Agenda Bill No. 26P
Referred To:
Date: October 6, 1970
Subject: PolTcy Statement requiring annexation to municipalities for areas requiring urban services- LAFCO
Submitted By:
City Council
Statement of the Matter
A letter has been received from the City.of Chula Vista soliciting support in urging the adoption of a policy by the Local Agency Formation Commission, requiring annexation to municipalities in any any areas which require urban services. A resolution has been prepared for the Council!s consideration.
Exhi bi t
1. Letter dated September 29, 1970 from the City of Chula Vista. 2. Resolution No. 5811 of the City of Chula Vista. 3. Resolution No. 1796 of the City of Carlsbad.
4. .Resolution No. 609 of the City of Del Mar. 5. Resolution No. 11352 of the City of La Mesa.
Staff Recommendations
.- .* . * L
AB No. 268 Date: October 6, 1970
City Manager's Recommendation
Council Action
10-6-70 Removed from agenda; to be considered at November 4, 1970 Council meeting.
11-17-70 Council in agreement and in favor of Resolution from Chula Vista. Matter returned to City Attorney to redraft Res- - olution #1796. Copy to be sent to all members of Board of Supervisors, Local Agency Formation Commission and San Diego County MunicipalitiesJ-w4%d'u * #AlJ&&'
12-1-70 Resolution #1796 adopted, urging LAFCO to adopt policy requiring annexation to municipalities for any areas which require urban services.
..
-2-
The City of
CHULA VISTA
California
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
The Honorable Mayor & City Council.
City of Carlsbad
296C Pi0 Pic0 Drive
Carlsbad, California 92008
e 0 TELEPHONE 427-3300 CIVIC CENTER 27G GUAVA AVENUE 0 CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 92010
Xe zre .~-r.rare. that we havt~: not sinplarly hen sufferi.nq from. the
frustra.tin5 e.ffects 02 this prticui.ar problea and would hope that
sir?.ilar problmis incurred hny your ciky wocld encourzce you to s~p-
port this request to the Loccil Aqenzy Formcitior. Corrr.r?.issj.o:i. V7e
l-ia~~z iic; in-tention of having this beccme a. “wrist-slapping” exercise,
but wish a rcaffirrn3tion by t.he L’ucal. Agency E‘crratioc Com?ission
of the philosophy as Expressed to and understood k17 us in our con- tacts with State legislators.
Your consideratim of this requ.es-t vil:! he greatly appreciated.
May or
TDH: JDR: IS
Enclosure
.. f
I
UNClL OF TiX CITY OF CIiffLI1 VISTA IJRGIMG TilE LOCAL AGE5CY FORbUi'FIOX COYi+:ISSI95 TO
ADOPT A POLICY OF REQUIRIMG ANNZXATIOW TO >TUZ;ICIPALIIIES
€Z UilBiW SERVICE3
ula Vista does hersSy
a
new policy he adopted and firzily to by the Local Agency Formation Cornmissior, to encoxrage the annexa- tion of areas.requiring urban services to adjacent mmicipalities in all circumstances where such annexation is possible, ant!
WHEREAS, as an exai-ple of new directions, it has been suggested that except for the function of providing the basic re-
gional service for transportation of sewage, the Spring Vall2y Sani- tation District and all urbanized areas in the Sweetwater Valley be incorporated into a County Service Area ighich inkturn would contract with the City of Chula Vista or other appr'opriate municipality to provide local sewer distribution service.
City of Chuia Vista does hereby urge the Local Agency Formation Can- mission to adapt by resolution or other appropriate fom. a policy of requiring annexation wherever appropriate an easible to mu to grovide for urban services.
cannot be accon?l.ls?-ed thaL County Service Area %e estaklishd and services be perforned pursuant to contracts with adjacer,t. aunicipalLties,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
RE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in those cases where annexation
- (s) Thornas D. Hamilton --- Mayor of the City of Chula Vista
M“XST: (s) Jennie 11. Fulasz
City Clerk
STATE OF CXI;IFC?32iTA )
Cv”tTXTY OF SA:: DEGO ) ss. ‘
CITY OF CHUU VISTA )
I, JENNIE: 31. FUWSZ, City CLrk of the ‘City ‘of Giula Vista, California,
DO HEWBY CERTIFY that the 2bove and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
Resolution No. - 5811 -, and that the szze has oot been axended
or repealed.
DATED : September 22, 1970
City Clerk
2
3
8
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
nexation b
TIiER RESOLVED tha
ished that Coun
Zertified c
n
1
5
6
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
RESOLUTION NO-. 609
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEL MAR
URGING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO ADOPT
A POLICY OF REQUIRING ANNEXATION TO MUNICIPALITIES FOR
AREAS WHICH REQUIRE URBAN SERVICES OR INCORPORATION OF
THOSE AREAS AS SEU-GOVERNING ENTITIES.
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Del Mar believes that it is
the obligation of the Local Agency Formation Commission to encourage planned
growth throughout the County of San Diego by requiring annexation of areas
desiring urban services to adjacent cities, or incorporation of those areas;
and
WHEREAS the City Council further believes that such a policy will
eliminate the proliferation and expansion of special service districts, thereby
eliminating the devisive and spasmodic governmental results of such special
service districts;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Del Mar does hereby urge the Local Agency Formation Commission to adopt by
resolution or other appropriate form a policy of requiring annexation, except
in extraordinary circumstances, to adjacent cities to provide for urban ser-
vices, or incorporation of those areas;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of Del Ear
is hereby authorized and directed to forward certified copies of this reso-
lution to the Local Agency Formation Commission, to the Board of Supervisors
of San Diego County, to the City Councils of each of the municipalities in
San Diego County, and to the local legislators.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Del Mar,
California, at a regular meeting held this 2nd day of November, 1970, by the following vote:
AYES: MAYOR PEARSON, COUNCIMNIHEINZMANN, RYPINSKI, STAVER, SILBER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
f? City of Del Mar, California
.
RESOLUTION NO. lu57
RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUiKTL OF' THE
CITY OF LA MESA URGING TIC LOCAL AGENCY
FORiQ4TION COTr.@iISSION TO ADOPT A POLICY
.OF REQUIRING ANNEXATION TO NUNICIPALI-
TIES FOR ANY AREAS WHICH REQUIW URBAN
SERVICES
The City Council of the City of La Mesa does
hereby resolve as follows :
MHEREAS, the City of La Mesa believes in order
to achieve an orderly pattern of growth for San Diego
County that the Local Agency Formation Commission be en-
couraged to adopt a new policy for the annexation of
areas requiring urban services to adjacent municipali-
ties in all circumstances t57here such annexation is
possible.
IJHEREAS certain urbanized areas cannot be
annexed, and said areas should be incorporated into a
County Service Area to provide, among othcr services,
loc a 1 s ewer di s t r i but ion s e rvi c e.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City
Council of the City of La Mesa does hereby urge the Local
Agency Formation Commission to adopt by resolution or
other appropriate form a policy of requiring annexation
of areas to adjacent municipalities wherever possible.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in those cases
where annexation cannot be accomplished that County
Service Area be established and services be performed
pursuant to contracts with adjacent municipalities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of
the City of La Mesa be, and she is hereby authorized and
directed to forward certified copies of this resolution
to the Local Agency Formation Commission, all members of
the Board of Supervisors of San Diego County and to the
City Councils of each of the municipalities in San Diego
County.
PASSED AND ADQPTED at a regularly adjourned
meeting of the City Council of the City of La ibiesa,
California, held the 29thday 02 October > 1970,
by the EollovJLng vote, to wit:
AYES: Councilmen Uselton, Bailey, Cosgriff
Ni)ES : None
ABSENT : lYaYor Helland, Councilman Jensen
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLEZK
I, NmGARET PI. XEILLY, City Clerk of the City
of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing
to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No.217~17 , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City
on the date and by the vote therein recited.
MARGARET Pi. REILLY, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)
-2-