HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-03-16; City Council; 377; Employer-Employee Relations Resolution' T •K E C I T F O F C A R L S B A D, C A L I F* O R N I A
�!77 , Date: March 16, 197-1
Agenda Bill No. I�-'-�- _-
Referred To:
Subject: Submitted By:
�. Employer -Employee Relations Resolution
City Manager
Statement of the Matter
The Carlsbad f olice,Officers Association has requested formal recognition
as a bargaining agent for Carlsbad Police Officers. To date the City has
observed -the provisions of Meyers-Milias-Brown Act as amended in conduct;
ing salary and other negotiations. However, this procedure has been done
on an informal basis since we have not had a request for formal recogni-
tion by any employee group.
Since the Police Officers' Association has asked for formal recognition, '+
it is necessary to adopt an employer -employee relations resolution in
order to set forth guidelines for recognition of bargaining agents for
City employees.
Exhibit
Letter from Carlsbad Police Officers' Association. (3-8-71)
Staff Recommendations
—_A
As No. Date: March 16, 1971
3
I
City Manager's Recommendation
Instruct staff to draft an employer -employee relations resolution for
i consideration by the City Council. If this suggestion is accepted by
1 the City Council, the City Manager will notify the Carlsbad Police
Officers' Association that they may participate in our present infor-
mal negotiations do salaries and fringe benefits but that formal recog-
nition will be deferred pending approval by the City Council of an ems
ployer-employee relations resolution.
G
1
i
t
Council Action
a 3-16-71 Council instructed staff to draft Resolution for.ially recogni"zi•ng
the Carlsbad Police Officers Association as a bargaining agent.
i
-2-
t
/\ A n T fJ _n A it 'n T T !I V A 4 F T n 2 O S' A S S 0 C 1 A T T 0 N i
v era u u v u n- r v as i v u v� +. v :
March 8, 1971
Jack Arnold, City Manager
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Dear Mr. Arnold:
Thie is to advise you that at our meeting of the Carlsbad i
Police Officers' Association on March 3, 1971, the motion
was wade and passed that we withdraw our membership with
the City of Carlsbad Employees' Association. It was also
agreed that any members desiring to continue their member-
ship with the City of Carlsbad Employees' Association may
do so.
In withdrawing our membership, it is hereby requested the
Carlsbad Police Officers' Association be recognized as a
separate Association and thereby avail us the right of
bargaining with the City of Carlsbad.
Your consideration is also requested in allowing the Finance
Department to deduct our monthly dues each month as has been
done in the past for the City Employeest Association.
Your consideration in these matters is appreciated.
SincerA"dent
l
CARLSBAD POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION
hhc/div
0
March 26, 1970
Mr. Windor S. Priday
City Manager
City Hall
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mr. Priday:
Carlsbad: is one of the smaller cities and yet the most rapidly growing cities in
San Diego County. Along with this growth comes the .nany, related r .)cial problems,
one of the most serious of which is crime, in all its various fours. We do not
pretend to know what the answer to this problem is since, obviously, no single
answer exists. We propose to take one very vital step toward an overall solution
by submitting a request to the establishment of well -trained, adequately compensated
and career -minded law enforcement department in the City of Carlsbad.
Until now, salary adjustments and benefits for our police officers have been made
periodically on an ad hoe basis, generally reflecting the press of c6st-of-living
increases and_attempted comparisions with nearby cities and counties. These salary
adjustments reflect in part past cost -of -living increases and do not provide for
the present cost -of -living increases that beset us on all sides.
A careful study made by the Peace Officers Research Association of California along
with other -police associations reveals that the time is long past due for a candid
recognition of the problems in recruitment and retention of personnel, and the need
for developing a more professional and better trained law enforcement officer. These
needs have created a request to an approach to salaries and certain related benefits
to give impetus to their solution.
1.
Promotional opportunities are limited (less than 5% reach top management positions).
These opportunities in the typical police department are 50% or less of what they
are in -the typical fire department "parity" between the two departments, it 'results
in an actual saiary discrimination against policemen because of the differing number -
of promotional positions. Comparing the above to other civilian opportunities, law
enforcement does not present significant opportunity for advancement into higher pay-
ing and other endeavors.
2.
97he present salary system in virtually all police departments, with some occasional
but relatively insignificant variations, stops salary advancements apart from cost -
of -living annual adjustments after about three years of service in the basic rank.
With limited promotional opportunities, many can look forward to no economic advance-
ment after three years, although their experience worth is still climbin .
-2-
In many cities, police salaries are tied to the salaries of other municipal employees,
most often those of firemen. This practice often aggrieves both policemen and fire-
men, and sometimes provokes hot debates about which kind of public servant has the
more arduous or perilous job and should, therefore, be the better paid. Not wishing
+o become involved in another dispute, at this time, it is felt that identical pay
scales for employees with widely differing functions are unfair and unwise, and it is
recommended that salary proposals for each department within local government should
be considered on their own merits and should not be joined with the demands of other
departments within our City.
Governor Reagan has stated in a booklet entitled, "Td Keep dur People Safe and Free"
that, harassment, tough working conditions and low pay are making it difficult to re-
cruit qualified persons to serve as lawmen. To locate and employ the types of people
wno musi'be attracted io -ponce woric, careers in i-aw-enror`dement mu`si De
professional status. Mor-% advantages are needed in terms of compensation, benefits,
opportunities for advancement and job satisfaction. A certification payment program,
in addition, should be made to the policeman in addition to his regular salary thus
enhancing a greater advantage remaining in law enforcement in addition to upgrading
his educational credits in his chosen field.
The absolute decision to remain in local law enforcement is made by a lawman when he
attains the age of 35 years, because unlike any other profession, outside of firemen,
a lawman cannot transfer, to another law enforcement agency, unless he is striving for
the head of a law department, consequently, he remains in his own agency working to
better himself in his field through experience and educational training programs thus
furthering his professional status and receiving proper recognition through compensa-
tion and promotion within his department. The time is upon us when city government
must give adequate compensation and a renewed evaluation of the "professionalization
of law enforcement" and the standards we are required to maintain. By upgrading salaries
and opportunities for advancement, we can attract the .best men available.
Further consideration should be given to compensation of legal holidays whereas dis-
crimination has been made against the officers who have worked their full shifts dur-
ing the week of the holiday but due to the revolving shifts are off duty that particular
holiday and unlike the other city departments who are compensated for the holiday even
when it falls on a weekend and the departments are closed. I. E. legal holiday on a
Sunday, City, County and Federal agencies are closed on the following Monday.
In the State of California, most law enforcement officers work a basic 250 days, 2000
hours or to be exact 2080 hours (40 hours X 52 weeks) including vacation time. The
field officers, in this department, work 273 days, 2184 hours (168 hours per 28 days
X 13 periods=364 days) including vacation time, which, in turn, approximates working
12 days or 96 hours with no compensation. We feel that recognition should be given,
tothis inequitable situation along with a promotional expansion program, certification
payment program and a greater cost -of -living salary increase.
Respectfully submitted,
N. D. Whipple, Vice President
Carlsbad Police Officers Association
NDW/gl
1970 T. i
The Carlsbad -Police Officers Association respectfully requests'that the Carlsbad
City Council be made cognizant of this letter, so that we may be able to arrange
for --a representative meeting to pursue the contents therein, if they so desire.
Yours, .�
N. D. Whipple
Carlsbad Police Officers Association
NDW/gl