Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-08-29; City Council; 856; Request for change of zoner* THE C 'I T Y O F CARLSBAD,CALIF'ORNIA Agenda Bill No Date; August 29, 1972 -Referred To: City Council subject: Request for Change of Zone from R-l to RD-M Submitted By.- and adoption of a Specific Plan. Planning APPLICANT: PACIFIC VIEW DEVELOPMENT Commission Statement of the Matter This matter was considered by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting of August 22, 1972. The request for change of zone from R-l to-RD-M'and adoption of a Specific Plan were unanimously approved subject to conditions and limitations a.s outlined in the enclosed resol ution 'No . 81 4. The documents itemized below" complete this application for your further review and hearing. Exhibit 1 -. Staff Report 2 - Application 3 - Department Sketch 4 - Res. No. 814, announcing findings and decisions 5 - Applicant's Exhibits •_ Staff Recommendations Staff recommendations are more completely outlined in the referenced staff report, dated August, 22, 1972. AB NO.' . Date. City Manager's Recommendation Counci1 Action 9-5-72 The request for zone change from R-l to RD-M was approved and the specific plan was returned to the Planning "Commission with the instruction that any reference to.the inclusion of a restaurant and cocktail lounge does not comply with the RD.-M zoning ordinance and therefore should be deleted. Resolution #2071 was adopted and a first reading given-to . - Ordinance #9329. . . '" . " ' pretation 9-19-72 - City Attorney be instructed to submit a legal inter/ regarding RD-M zoning particularly concerning restaurants and cocktail lounges and how it would apply to this application. Ord. #9329 given second reading and adopted. -2- oSTAFF REPORT/HEEflJhNDUM W. AUGUST 22, 1972 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-l TO RD-M AND ADOPTION OF A SPECIFIC PLAN APPLICANT: PACIFIC VIEW DEVELOPMENT Report submitted by: City Manager, Fire, Engineering, Building, Pafks & Recreati'on a ltd Planning Depts. General Discussion . The applicant is requesting a change of zone from R-l to RD-M (Residential Density-Multiple) and adoption of a Specific Plan on 3.5_ acres located west of Carlsbad Boulevard and southerly of Palomar Airport Road. The proposed project (a beach club) consists of three structures, 93 dwelling units, a restaurant cocktail lounge facility, and accommodations for 190 parking spaces. The primary building is proposed to be 10 stories from beach level and approximately 4 stories (40-45 feet) above the grade of Carlsbad Boulevard. The secondary structure is proposed to be primarily below grade and house the restaurant cocktail lounge facility. The project represents Phase I of a proposed 3 phase develop- ment. Phases 2 & 3 will be presented at a later date in con- junction with a potential rezone for the balance of the property. The ultimate size of the project will consist of 9.5 acres. A reclassification and specific plan will be required to be submitted as each phase develops. During the pre-hearing conferences, the staff requested the applicant to present their proposal to C.P.O. for evaluation of the proposal and its relationship to the airport proposal. The staff has received a letter from the Executive Director (Mr. Richard Huff) indicating the airport would have a minimal impact on the subject property, (Letter is attached). Secondly the interim influence zone for Palomar Airport a-s established by the Airport Land Use Commission also indicates minimal impact on the subject property. Land use in the general vicinity of the proposal consists of the Solomar Mobile Home Park to the east, vacant R-A and R-l property to the east, north of the Palomar Airport Road inter- change and approximately 1/4 mile south of the southern boundary are the various units of the Terramar subdivision Page Two Staff Report w August 22, 1972 and the South Carlsbad State Beach is to the south. Water, sewer and circulation as proposed are adequate to serve the 'subject property. The General Plan indicates medium density (21-47 dwelling units per acre), residential development to the north and low-medium (8-21 dwelling units per acre) residential development to the east across Carlsbad Boulevard. There is not a General Plan land use recommendation for the property west of Carlsbad Blvd. and within the boundary of the subject property medium density is recommended for the northern portion of the pro- perty programmed to be in the third developmental phase. Recommendations: The staff recommends approval subject to the following reasons and conditions. Reasons of Approval; !-. The proposed application will not be detrimental to the adjoining properties. 2. The subject application represents a type.of program that will enhance and encourage quality development within the City of Carlsbad. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the Specific Plan (Exhibit A) shall be adopted, any deviation or change to 'the Specific Plan shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. 2. That all fire hydrants and fire fighting devises shall be constructed according to U.F.C. and requirements as set by the City of Carlsbad Fire Chief. 3. A detailed soils report will be required for the proposed retaining wall at the north end of the property. 4. Ingress and egress from the property to Carlsbad Boulevard shall be limited to the northerly most limits of the property, as shown on exhibit "B" on file in the office of the City Engineer. This access shall be allowed subject to construction of adequate public improvements including, but not limited to, deceleration lanes, channelization, signing and striping, to be approved by the City Engineer. 5. Open trenches will not be allowed across Carlsbad Boulevard for the purposes of utility installation. 6. An 8' minimum width pedestrian walkway shall be provided along the length of the proposed development. This walkway shall be physically separated from the Carlsbad Boulevard roadway, and is to connect to a minimum 20' public beach access, of su,bi<?rt- ncvonprtv Rage Three ^ Staff Report wAugust 22, 1972 7. The proposed project shall be subject to the payment of parks in lieu fees. 8. A Landscape and sprinkler system plan shall be provided as required by ON. 9181. APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE INSTf.iJCTIONS TO APPLICANT: and, ACTION OF A SPECIFIC PLAN 1. Complete Parts A,B,C,D and E. Submitted to the Carlsbad City 2.'Filing Fee $100.00 plus $5.00 for each Planning Commission additional lot or parcel. Date Received ^^v*^a_ r"l^ (t\ 17. 3. Make check payable to City of Carlsbad. Date of Hearing 4. Information to be type written. PART A GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Applicant PACIFIC VIEW DEVELOPMENT Telephone 753-1181 Applicant's Mailing Address Rt. 1. Box 2550. Encinitas. California Q2024 Location of Property by Street West side of Carlsbad Blvd., approximately 1800' south of Palomar Road. PART B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach"to this application one copy of a complete legal description of the property for which a change of zone and adoption of a specific plan is requested. PART C REQUEST f) ' ' Tk ' Change of Zone from /C — / • to ft- Q ~ PART D MAP . Attach to this application 20 COPIES of a map prepared by a registered civil engineer, architect or licensed land surveyor which shows the exact boundaries, dimensions and bearing of each line of the property for which a reclassification and a specific plan is requested; names and widths -of bordering streets-; location and width of alleys and/or easements. PART E APPLICANT'S STATEMENT ' (Attach separate sheet if area for statement is not sufficient) ,1. Does public necessity require the proposed change? Is there a real need in the community for mere of the types of uses permitted by the Zone requested than can be accommodated in the areas already zoned for such uses? The proposed condominium dwelling units and beach club will be a distinct asset to the City of Carlsbad. Proximity to the beach creates the need for the proposed development. 2. Is the property involved in the proposed reclassification more suitable for the purposes permitted in the proposed zone than for the purposes permitted in the present classification? Yes. Multiple dwelling use in this area is proposed as a part of the City's General Plan. Original zoning was for Agricultural purposes and said property is not suitable for that purpose. 3. Would the uses permitted by the proposed zone be detrimental in any way to surrounding property? No< Surrounding property-consists of ocean on the -'.west & the State of CaldO So. Carlsbad Beach and ujtpground on the so.; said campground has activity all year long; on the east sloping terrain & peraration by Carlsbad Blvd. make said project compatible w/Solamar Mobile Park •4. What-were ~tne ongxival Seetl restrictions, if any, concerning the type and ' class of uses permitted on the property involved? Give the expiration date of. these restrictions. None. !The following spaces are for signatures of owners whose properties lie within a radius of 300 feet of the property proposed to be reclassified and who approve of the change (attach extra sheets if necessary). .'o.on Map Name Address Lot Block Tract -2- . "ve, the' undersigned properiWowners herewith requestS^at our respective properties which are included in the reclassification petitioned for, be reclassified and for the reasons above enumerated. CThis space is for signatures of owners of property actually included in the proposed rreclassif ication. Attach extra sheets if necessary.) •Jo. on Map Name Address Lot Block Tract • • t OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA) BOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) :ITY OF__ :/ (we), SS .being duly sworn, depose and say that I (we) ;jn (are) the owner (s) of part (or all) of the property involved and this ipplication has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the :ity Planning Commission as printed herein and that the foregoing information thoroughly and completely, to the best of my (our) ability, presents an argument in behalf of the application herewith submitted and that the rtatements and information above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief. :elephone Number 714/753-1181 Signed Mailing Address; Rt/1, Box 2550, Egciftitas, Calif. ^^^u^^^^^ ^ _- ^ig?2^th^ °J,My %-. <^"' »'.*»«'" * •* lj;3_!0 • C"»- If UK<'»«»v " •' AURORA E. CUNEY I: FP.If.T.IPLE OFFICE IN }•' SrtN DIEGO COUNTY i . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 22, 1975 r ' Subscribed and sworn to before • d /? /} iling Clerk or Notary Public "his is to certify that the foregoin"g^Jappliica'£idri'r"hlaV been inspected by me .nd found to be complete and acceptable for filing with the City Planning ;ommission. _ Receipt No. By...For the City Planning Commission -3- SUBJECT: Reelassification from R-l to RD-M* & Adoption of a Specific Plan APPLICANT: PACIFIC VIEW DEVELOPMENT DATE: JULY 25, 1972 1 j PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 814 2 j A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM Z R-l TO RD-M (RESIDENTIAL DENSITY MULTIPLE), AND THE ADOPTION OF A SPECIFIC PLAN ON PROPERTY LOCATED WEST 4 OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT'ROAD 5 6 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Title 21 of the Carlsbad 7 Municipal Code, the Carlsbad City Planning Commission did on August 8 22, 1972, hold a duly not'iced public hearing to gonsider the applica- 9 tion of Pacific View Development for a change of zone from R-l to 10 RD-M, and the adoption of a Specific Plan on property located on the 11 west side of Carlsbad Boulevard and-south of Palomar Airport and more 12 particularly described as follows: 13 That portion of Lot "H", Rancho Agua Hedionda, in 14 the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State 15 of California, according to partition Map thereof 16 No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder 17 . of San Diego County on November 16, 1896, and more 18 particularly described in application on file in the 19 City Planning Office. •20 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering the 21 testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be 22 heard, said Commission did find the following facts and reasons to 23 I exist which make the approval of the application for change of zone 24 necessary to carry out the provisions and general purpose of Title 25 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: 26 1. The proposed application will not be detrimental to the adjoining 27 properties. 28 2. The subject application represents a type of program that will 29 enhance and encourage quality development within the City of 50 Carlsbad. 31 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the 32 City of Carlsbad that it does hereby recommend to the City Council, the adoption of an Amendment to Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal. Code, changing the existing R-l zoning to RD-M zoning and the adoptio of a Specific Plan for development subject to the following condition and limitations: 1. That the Specific Plan (Exhibit A) shall be adopted, any devia- tion or change to the Specific Plan shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. 2. That all fire hydrants and fire fighting devices shall be con- * structed according to U.F.C. and requirements as set by the City of 10 Carlsbad Fire Chief. 11 3. A detailed soils report will be:required for the proposed retaini 12 wall at the north end of the property. 13 4. Ingress and egress from the property to Carlsbad Boulevard shall 14 be limited to the northerly most limits of the property, as shown 15 on exhibit "B" on file in the office of the City Engineer. This 16 access shall be allowed subject to construction of adequate public 17 improvements including, but not limited to, deceleration lanes, 18 channelization, signing and striping, to be approved by the City Engineer. •20 5. ..Open trenches will not be allowed across Carlsbad Boulevard for 23- the purposes of'utility installation. 22 i 6. An 8' minimum width pedestrian walkway shall be provided along the length of the proposed development. This walkway shall be 24 physically separated from the Carlsbad Boulevard roadway, and is 25 to connect to a minimum 20' public beach access, provided at each 26 end of the subject property. 27 7. The proposed project shall be subject to the payment of parks 28 in lieu fees. 29j 8. A landscape and sprinkler system plan shall be provided as re- 30 quired by Ordinance 9181. 31 9. That parking facilities for the restaurant cocktail facility 32 shall be established 1n conformance with City of Carlsbad parking requirements. 1 2 3 4 ! 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29|| 30 31 32 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of August, 1972, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Jose, Little, Dewhurst, Dominguez, Forman, Palmateer, Norman NOES: None ABSENT: No one ELMER H. JOSE, JR., Chairman ATTEST: EDMOND W. DOMINGUEZ, Secretary 1 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE 7 .. WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of August, 1972," the Carlsbad City8 Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 814, which is herewithy referred to and made a part hereof; and10 WHEREAS, on September 5, 1972, a duly advertised public 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 2071 CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND DECISION REGARDING CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-l TO RD-M (Residential Density-Multiple) ZONE AND ADOPTION OF A SPECIFIC PLAN ON PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF CARLSBAD BOULE- VARD AND SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. (Pacific View Development)~ hearing was hel.d as prescribed by law to consider a Change of Zone from R-l to RD-M (Residential Density-Multiple) Zoning, and adoption of a Specific Plan on property described as: That portion of Lot "H", Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to partition Map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on November 16, 1896, and more par- ticularly described in application on file in the City Clerk's Office. WHEREAS, the City Council received all recommendations and heard all persons interested in or opposed to the proposed change of zone and Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad DOES HEREBY DECLARE FINDINGS AND RESOLVE that the findings of the Planning Commission contained in Resolution No. 814 consti- tute the findings of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad. BE IT FURTHER DECLARED AND RESOLVED that the City Council certifies that the approval of the proposed change of zone classification and the adoption of the Specific Plan is necessary to carry out the general purpose of Ordinance No. 9060, as amended XX XX XX -1- 1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City 2 of Carlsbad does hereby declare its intention to adopt an 3 ordinance to effectuate the proposed change of zone classification 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 5 City Council held on the 5th day of September, 1972, by the 6 following vote, to wit: 7 AYES: 8 NOES: 9 ABSENT: APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL1 10 . DATE-4 DAVID M. DUNNE, Mayor 12 ATTEST: 13 14 15 MARGARET E. ADAMS, City Clerk 16 ., (SEAL) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO. 9328 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ADOPTING A SPECIFIC PLAN ON PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF CARLSBAD 80ULE- VARD AND SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. ('Pacific View Development) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, DOES ORDAIN that a Specific Plan for the hereinafter described real t property be adopted in the following particulars: SECTION 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. That portion of Lot "H", Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to partition Map thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on November 16, 1896, and more particularly described in application on file in the City Clerk's Office. SECTION 2. GENERAL CONDITIONS: The Specific Plan, entitled Exhibit "A", attached hereto, is su'bject to the following conditions and restrictions: A. The development of the property described in Section 1 hereof shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all requirements, limitation and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereinafter may be in force for the purpose of preserving the residential characteristics of adjacent properties. B. All public improvements shall be made in conformity with the subdivision ordinance and other City standards to the satisfac- tion of the City Engineer, without cost to the City of Carlsbad, and free of all liens and encumbrances. C. All land and/or easements required by this ordinance shall be granted to the City of Carlsbad without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. XX XX -1- D. No other use shall be allowed upon said property until Specific Plans for it have been submitted and approved by the City Planning Commission and the City Council. SECTION 3. PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS: The following conditions shall apply with respect to any development after the effective date of this ordinance of the property described in rt Section 1 hereof. 1. That the Specific Plan (Exhibit A) shall be adopted, any deviation or change to the Specific Plan shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. 1 2. That all fire hydrants and fire fighting devices shall be constructed according to U.F.C. and requirements as set by the City of 13 Carlsbad Fire Chief. 3. A detailed soils report will be required for the proposed retaining wall at the north end of the property. 16 4. Ingress and egress from the property to Carlsbad Boulevard 17 shall be limited to the northerly most limits of the property, as shown 18 on exhibit "B" on file in the office of the City Engineer. This 19 access shall be allowed subject to construction of adequate public 20 improvements including, but not limited to, deceleration lanes, 21 channelization, signing and striping, to be approved by the City Engi neer. 5. Open trenches will not be allowed across Carlsbad Boulevard for the purposes of utility installation. 6. An 8' minimum width pedestrian walkway shall be provided along the length of the proposed development. This walkway shall be physically separated from the Carlsbad Boulevard roadway, and is to connect to a minimum 20' public beach access, provided at each end of the subject property. 7. The proposed project shall be subject to the payment of parks in lieu fees. XX 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 XX -2- 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 8. A landscape and sprinkler system plan shall be provided as required by Ordinance 9181. 9. That parking facilities for the restaurant cocktail facility shall be established in conformance with City of Carlsbad parking requirements. SECTION 4. REQUIRED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BEFORE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT: The following shall be granted to the City of Carlsbad before any building permit will be issued for the developmen of the property described in Section 1 hereof: A. All street improvements including water, sewer, under- ground power and telephone, street tree planting, street light, storm drain and any other improvements deemed necessary by the City Engineer shall be installed in conformance with City Standards and indicated on an approved improvement plan prior to the issuance of a bui1di ng permi t. 16 SECTION 5. ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT: The Building 17 Department shall not approve any building for occupancy until the Planning Director has certified that all the conditions of this 19 ordinance have been satisfied. The Planning Director of the City of Carlsbad is designated as the enforcing officer of this Specific Plan. His decision shall be final as to whether the subject property has been properly developed and improved. However, the owners of the subject property may appeal to the City Council any decision of the Planning Director relative to this Specific Plan. Such appeal shall be in writing and filed with the City Clerk within 10 days following the receipt of the decision of the Planning Director. The City Council's decision shall be final. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Carlsbad shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen (15) days -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 after its adoption. INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the fh day of September, 1972, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the^>?fh day of September, 1972, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: , AEEROVED BY CITY COUNCIL RATE DAVID M. DUNNE, Mayor ATTEST: MARGARET E. ADAMS, City Clerk (SEAL) -4- 1 ORDINANCE NO. 9329 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD 3 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060 BY GRANT- ING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-l TO RD-M 4 (Residential Density-Multiple) ZONE ON PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF CARLSBAD 5 BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. 6 (Pacific View Development) 7 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, DOES8 ORDAIN, that Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance No. 9060 is amended toy read as follows:10 SECTION 1. That the following described real property is granted a change of zone from R-l to RD-M (Residential Density- JL& Multiple) subject to the provisions contained in Ordinance No.lo 9328, and that the zoning map referred to in Section 21.06.03014 of said Ordinance No. 9060, as amended, be changed accordingly:15 That portion of Lot "H", Rancho Agua 16 Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Calif- 17 ornia, according to partition Map thereof No. 823, filed in the office 1° of the County Recorder of San Diego County on November 16, 1896, and 19 more particularly described in app- lication on file in the City Clerk's 20 office. 21 SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be 22 effective thirty (30) days after its adoption and the City Clerk 23 shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to 24 be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal fifteen (15) 25 days after its adoption. 26 XX 27 XX 28 XX 29 XX 3° XX 31 XX 32 XX -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of September, 1972, and thereafter PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19th day of September, 1972, by the following vote, to wit; AYES: NOES: ABSENT:APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 'ILLDATE DAVID M. DUNNE, Mayor ATTEST: MARGARET E. ADAMS, City Clerk (SEAL) -2- Carlsb California Sept. 5, ,972 The Honorable City Council Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: We the undersigned voters and/or property owners in Carlsbad oppose the erection of the high- rise structures, the restaurant and bar, proposed by Pacific View Devel opment for La Costa on the beach near Palomar Airport Road, for one or more of the following reasons: (1) It is detrimental to the use of the public beach. (2) It will adversely affect the character of the area and its population. (3) It will destroy the view from the Scenic Drive. (4) It will create hazardous traffic conditions which endanger the safety of the area. (5) It makes no provisions for parking for the mentioned public access, (6) As currently submitted, it violates several sections of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. (7) A public bar and restaurant is totally i nconsistent with the area and a violation of RD-M zoning. (8) It will be an excessive burden on the taxpayers in the immediate future. We therefore request that the rezoning application from Rl-1 to RD-M and the specific plan for Lot H, Rancho Agua Hedionda, be denied and disapproved. Respectfully submitted, /^ Sigpqtu7e~~^// Printed Name „ Street Address The Honorable City Council Signature -Page 2- Printed Name Sept. 5, 1972 Re: Lot H, Rancho Agua Hedionda Street Address CorUbw. .olifornlo S«p».5, 1972 Th« Honor obi* CHy Council Corlibod, California lor LaCostoontiwbMMh and bar * pr opQMMi by Aifport toady for 0m or morv of IM Wiowlny (0 (2) (3) I twlH (4) itwttl (7) A public faar and imtoucan* Is total ty tManrfctantwfth thearaaanda vlolattanof ftD-M (0) Jtwill be W« thwefbr* requoM that ttw nsontng aptalkollan from St-1 to «>•« and tf» sfwcine plan for Lot H, a S*pt. 5, 1972 Sa: Lot H, Aguo HocRomia ^ Corlsbo California Sept. 5, ./72 The HcwwroWe City Council CarUbad, California Genii amen: We th0 undersigned voter* and/or property owners In Carlsbad oppose the erection of the Mgh- rise structure*, the restaurant and bar, proposed fay Pacific View Development for la Costa on the beach near flolotnar Airport NGMB« for one or more of the following (1) It Is detrimental to the use of Ihe public beach. (2) »t will adversely affect the character of the oreo and Ht population. (3) It will destroy the view from the Scenic Drive. (4) It will create hazardous traffic condition* which endanger the safety of the (5) It moke* no provisions for parking for the mentioned public occesi. (6) At currently submitted, it violates several section* of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. (7) A public boror^restauforrtb totally inconsistent with the oreoondo RD-M zoning. (8) It will be on excessive burden on the taxpayers in the Imroedi«te future. We therefore request that the reasoning application from Rl-1 to RD-M and the specific plan for Lot H, Rancho Agua Hedtenda, be denied and disapproved. Retpectfulty submitted. ?, ft»C% Council Sept. 5, 1972 R»s Lot Hf 12 13 MM 14 15 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 CorUb Sept. 5 CoUfornio Th.HonowW.CHy Cornell Gentlemen: the unoarHQnod volws ono/or jxopwfy owned In vCflMb flftHkttOlAl HMMI flllMMK _^^^^^^wuu«jhA ^•iUfl BMH0 9MMM!MMI^^^M B^k^ M^HdkSGufe %jlTJ^»^me Hmdufekf tne fVHmiianc ono DOT/ profiowQ oy roc««c vtew on the bench neor rtoionar Afaport ftood/ for on. or now C2) It will odveoely affect the chowcter of Ihe area ond lit (3) H wtlI dertroy the view nxra the Scenic Drive. (4) I 0) It mqicet no piwbtom far porking far the mentioned publfc (6) At cuMMgly submitted, tt vioiotai igveotl «ecHom of the Corbbod (7) ^ LQ Corto H will be tin «He«»Jv» buiaoo <x» •c therefore request that the fwonlnB applkotkm frora Rl-1 to K&-M and Hie ipaelfle plan for Lot H, Ke^ehoAgBaHMaoiidaybe^i^rtt^dliopproM^, 1 2 3 4 5 ^fr-c-*.--* °)i^tP ^^&^^J^.S3^J^~?.£. I ^:_: The HownW. City Council Sept. 5, 1972 Re* to* H, J" w. 17 IS If 20 21 24" 26 35 CorUbf Collfornlo Sttpt. 5, •* OanH In MM mtoumw end bor* ppBpQMd by nscwic View Mewel opoient foe on ttw txmJt fMor ntsowor Al^poFf BEMHB^ PHT OBS or moro IMF fhs follow wfl (I) lfl»ctelrtewlallolh.u»offl»j«blleb<«di. (2) (3) (4) te will create hoBarda* Haffle cc«dmani whic \5) it roiMO no (6) y^cunwiH A public oof and raMouran* • totally i nconHStoftf wlm RIB 4ifMi ood 0 vtotaliod of it will be ar> etusauto hunkn on lh» la^aMt in AMI *• tharaiom recfjest 4w» H» MMnini a^teoHoo from R 1-1 to RD-.' for Lot H, • -^ - /^'i 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 Council -**e»2- Sept. 5, 1772 lotH, H 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 If 20 21 22 23 24~ 25^ 26 ^ "ST 29 39 31 34 35 Cerlsbo Sept. 5, The Honor abb Qty Council Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: We the undenlgned votMS and/far property owners In Carlsbad oppose the erection of the high-rise structures, the nvtoufont and bar, proposed by Pacific View Development for La Costa on lite baoch near PeJomar Aitpor t Road, for one or more of the fel I owing (1) ItUdetrlmentel to the use of the public beach. (2) It will aaVtawiy aflKt the choractw of the or«a and Ita poputethm. (3) It will destroy the vtev from the Seanfe Drive. \5/ I f tnokaK no ynj^l>IonK for potklny for Mm nMptione<i puol HS As curranHy «ubmltted, it vtolote* Severn! sections of the CarUbad Municipal Cod*. (7) A public DOT orKlnwImwant Is totally inconstoent with the on» and a violet Ion of R£>-M zoning. (8) I twill be an excessive burden on nSeloxpayen In the Imnedlatfe future \fj^ ill in «i»iti 11. •tByMUM* *L^A «t^_ n«i«|-| ntn in •Imlti --*- rj_-_niu Dl_l b« 0f^_AA mill ll i •*» - -J _-»we menwore nsajuear msw me nszontno appiicanon cram Ri*"f 10 n/^ivi ana me specwic pi an for lot H, RonchoAgueHediondo, be denied and dbopproved. Respectfutlysubmtrled, Slanatufe Mnted Nome Street Address .•Th» 11 CHy Council S«f*. 5, 1972 Se: lot H, Agm FlflBMI /?/ A - *- r 14 ' ' 16 17 V/ I? JO 2? 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 34 36 Car Is be California i. 5, 1972 The Honorable City Counci I Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: We the undersigned voters and/or property owners in Carlsbad oppose the erection of the high-rise structures, the restaurant and bar, proposed by Pacific View Development for La Costa on the beach near Palomar Airport Road, for one or more of the fol lowing reasons: (1) 11 is detrimental to the use of the pub I ic beach. (2) 11 will adverse! y affect the character of the area and its popul ation. (3) It will destroy the view from the Scenic Drive. (4) I twill create hazardous traffic conditions which endanger the safety of the area. (5) It makes no provisions for parking for the mentioned publ ic access. (6) As currently submitted, it violates several sections of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. (7) A publi c bar and res taurant is total ly inconsistent with the area and a vi ol at ion of RD-M zoning. (8) 11 will be an excess ive burden on the taxpayers in the immediate future. We therefore request that the rezoning application from Rl-1 to RD-M and the specific plan for Lot H, Rancho Agua Hedionda, be denied and disapproved. Respectful ly submitted, Signature Printed Name Street Address The Honorable-City Council -Page 2-Sept. 5, 1972 Re: Lot H7 Agua Hedionda Signature Printed Name Street Address £rf#J H,W. 34 On- 1 six California Sept. 5, 1972 The Honorable City Counei 1 Carlsbad, California {.•wirl emon* We the undersigned voters and/or property owner* in Car is bod oppose the erection of the high-rise structures, the restaurant and bar, proposed by Pacific View Development for La Costa on the beach near Palomar Airport Road, for one or more of the fol towing reasons: (1) I ti» detrimental to the use of the public beoch. (2) It will adverse! y affect Ike character of the area and its pooul at ion. (3) I twill destroy the view from the Scenic Drive. (4) i * will create hazardous traffic condi Horn which endanger the safety of the area. (5) it mokes no provisions for parking for the mentioned pubi ic access . (6) As currently submitted, it violates several sections of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. (7) A public bar and restaurant is totally inconsistent with the area and a violation of RD-M zoning. (8) it will be an excess ive burden on the taxpayers in the immediate future. We therefore request that the rezoning application from Rl-t to RD-M and the specific plan for Lot H, Rancho Ague Hedlonda, be denied and disapproved. Respectful ly submitted, Signature Printed Name Street Address The Honoftibl* City Council Sept. 5, 1972 Re: Lot H, Agua Hedlonda Signoture Printed Norn*StnMtAd&wi11& -v 12 'T)CMjttA*»L 1). 13 U & ~T'$T< LM ^x / • /Cf t&LCiL Solly A- Hcuntian22 2- ^2-3 23 A Di 24 25~ 26~ l7~ ~W w 30~ IT l2~ sT ^4~ IS"