HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-10-13; City Council; 639; Correspondence - AdvisoryTHE CITY OF C A R L S B A D, CALI F'OH N IA
4* - Agenda Bill No. Date: January 13, 1972
*Ref erred To :
Subject: Submitted By: F\
CORRESPONDENCE - ADVISORY City Clerk
_-
Statement of the Xatter
Prbpos'ed Annexat ions
..
Exhi bi t
Proposed Annexation Questionnaire - Thibodo Rancho Partnership
Proposed Annexation Questionnaire - Carillo Rancho Partnership
Staff Recommendations
.. . .. -
..
AB No. c39 Date:
I.
City Manager's Recommendation
.
-. co unci 1 * ~c ti on
- 1-18-72 .It was the decision of the Council that this matter be referred
~ to the staff for processing.
_. -.e
.-
-2-
S AN D 1 E G 0 LOCAL AG E NCY FO RHRT I ON C OMM I SS I ON
City Annexation Questionnaire - Part I
This portion of the questionnaire is to be coriipleted, anb signed,
by the pro.ponents of the proposed annexation.
I. Justification
A.
0.
C.
0.
E.
Why is this annexation being proposed and why is it being proposed at this time rather than earlier or at some time in the future?
It is proposed that property shall be developed in accordance with the Pre-Annexation zoning, to be
Gihy is it being proposed to annex to this particular city rather than to a district or to another city?
The City of Carlsbad provides municipal services
such as sewer facilities, library, and fire protection. Additionally, the City boundaries abut the property being proposed for annexation.
Why is this particular area, rather than a larger or smaller area, being proposed for annexation? CJhy shouldn't other nearby areas be included in the proposal?
A larger area could be included; however, proponents
only own 500 acres.
pproved by the City of Carlsbad.
Do the inhabitants of the area included in the proposal a17 agree with the proposed annexation?
100% consent of owners is provided for this
uninhabited annexation.
Do you have any other comments or justification regard- ing the proposed annexation?
Proposed annexation is an orderly extension of the
Date
CAQ- r LAFC' 8/20/65
.
c -.
SAN DIEGO LOCAL AGENCY FORIlATION COMMISSIOW
City Annexation Questionnaire - Part I
This portion of the questionnaire is to be completed, and signed,
by the prolj'onents of the proposed annexation.
I. Jus ti f i cation
A.
8.
C.
D.
E.
Why is this annexation being proposed and why is it being proposed at this time rather than earlier or at
some time in the future?
It is proposed that property shall be developed in accordance with the Pre-Annexation zoning, to be a proved by the City of Carlsbad. \Iffy is it being proposed to annex to this particular city rather than to a district or to another city? The City of Carlsbad provides municipal services such as sewer facilities, library, and fire protection. Additionally, the City boundaries abut the property being proposed for annexation.
Uhy is this particular area, rather than a larger or smaller area, being proposed for annexation? Why shouldn't other nearby areas be included in the proposal? The larger area could be included: however, proponents only own 835 acres.
Do the inhabitants of the area included in the proposal all agree with the proposed annexation?
100% consent of owners is provided for this uninhabited annexation.
Do you have any other comments or justification regard-
ing the proposed annexation?
Proposed annexation is an orderly extension of the City of Carlsbad boundaries.
Signed
I orTZ:.o, CRL,\F, qaro\
Date
CAQ- I LAFC 8/20/65