HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-11-29; City Council; 958; Tentative Map for CT 72-33 for 94-unit, 3 lot Condominium Development of Property Located in La Costa South Unit 1 2500 Navarra Drive Praver Brothers•THE CITY
Agenda Bill No.
OF
W
C A R L S B A D ,
Referred To: City Council
AL-IFOKNIA
Date: November 29, 1972
Subject.- TENTATIVE MAP FOR A 94-UNIT, 3-LOT
CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN
LA COSTA SOUTH UNIT NO. 1, 2500 NAVARRA, CARLSBAD
TRACT 72-33. —
Submitted By:
PLANNING COMMISSION
Statement of the Matter
*
The Planning Commission, at their regularly scheduled meeting of
November 28, 1972, considered the proposed Tentative Map for a
94-unit, 3-lot condominium development on property Icoated in
La Costa South Unit no. 1, 2500 Navarra, to be known as Carlsbad
Tract 72-33. After a short discussion, the Planning Commission
adopted Resolution No. 857 recommending approval to the City
Council .
The documents itemized below complete this application for your
further review and hearing.
Exhibit
1 - Application
2 - Staff Report, dated November 28, 1972
3 - Department Sketch
4 - Resolution No. 857, announcing findings and decisions
5 - Applicant's Exhibits
6 - Environmental Impact Assessment
7- Resolution No. 3028, approving the Tentative Map
Staff Recommendations
Staff recommendations are more completely outlined in referenced
staff report.
C D
AB No. Date:
City Manager's Recommendation
Council Action
12/5/72 Resolution No. 3028 was adopted, approving the Tentative
Map for a 94-unit, 3-lot condominium development on property
located in La Costa South Unit No. 1, 2500 Navarra, Carlsbad
Tract No. 72.33.
-2-
Filing Date
.
Hearing Date ^Z/T k&'<X& Receipt No. ^Jx /?6
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP .
PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION 2500 Navarra CAfcL'bfbAO TZACf "7 2. -'ib''*
GENERAL LOCATION At end of existing cul-de-sac (Navarra Drive) in
La Costa South r Unit 1 _
TOTAL ACREAGE 4.22- Acres NUMBER OF LOTS 3
MINIMUM LOT AREA (Sq.Ft.) _ ' MINIMUM FRONTAGE 67'-
TYPE OF SUBDIVISION (Re s i den t i a ] , Com '• 1 , lnd'1) Condominiums
PRESENT ZONE ^ft^ RO K * A^PROPOSED ZONE .^-3- g_OK
" rf^~^---'— '-1--1— •^™~-1 "- ' "• ^ ^ .-r.^V-^-Bf-™ -- ^
NAMES OF NEW STREETS PROPOSED No public streets proposed
PRE-FILING CONFERENCE HELD CDate)
REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, OR SURVEYOR WHO PREPARED
TOUPS ENGINEERING, INC.
MAP: By; Richard G. Grabhprn _ Vice President
5252 Balboa Avenue/ San Diego, California 92117 _ __.__
" CAddress) ' ~~~
THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATION TO THE ZONING OR SUBDIVISION REQUIRE-
MENTS ARE HEREBY REQUESTED: CGive reasons for mod i f tea t ions ; attach
separate sheet if additional space Ts required]
•
_ None _ - _ ___ _^___
RECEIVED
nni i Q 1972
CITY Of CARLSBAD
Planning Department
OWNER(S) OF PROPERTY (.Signatures)
9744 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 203
Praver Bros . Investments Beverly Hills, California 92012
" CA d d r e s s)
). \
LAddress)
INamel • (Add res si
SUBDIVIDER (Signature)
9744 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 203
_ _ Beverly Hills , California _92JQ12
PRAVER BROS^lsrblSTMENTS
fN'otc: This Application will be filed with 20 bluelinc prTnts and
and 1 brow line transparency of the Tentative Mop, prepared
according to the specifications of Ordinance M o . 9 0 5 0 and
amendments thereto, together with supplementary information
and fees as required by > ,-• i d ordinance.)
STAFF REPORT/MEMORflQuM fQfEMBER 28, 1972
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE MAP FOR A 94-UNIT, 3-LOT CONDOMINIUM
DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED.IN LA COSTA
SOUTH UNIT NO. 1, 2500 NAVARRA, CARLSBAD TRACT
72-33
APPLICANT: PRAVER BROTHERS INVESTMENT
Report submitted by: City Manager, Engineering, Fire, Building,
Parks & Recreation and Planning Departments
General Discussion:
The applicant proposes to develop a 94-unit condominium project
at 2500 Navarra Drive in the La Costa Master Plan area. The
total project area involves 4.22 acres in an RD-M zone, and
will develop at a'density of 22.3 dwelling units per acre.
The La Costa Master Plan allows a density of 43 dwelling units
per acre. All grading, provisions for utilities (gas, electric,
water) and improved public access was accomplished by a subdivi-
sion granted by the County of San Diego.
Additional restrictions for architecture, landscaping, and
density are contained in the C.C. & R.'s administered by the
La Costa Land Company. These restrictions are on file in the
Planning Department.
The proposed tentative map creates two lots for residential
purposes and a third lot (lot #3) as a common ownership lot
that will contain a parking structure and a recreational facility,
The applicant proposes to provide 133 parking spaces on site
and 36 spaces on the street within the development. City of
Carlsbad parking requirements require 169 spaces on site
for 94 dwelling units. (38 two-bedrooms and 56 one-bedrooms)
Recommendations ;
The staff recommends approval of the subject application for
the following reasons and subject to the following conditions:
Reasons for approval :
1. The proposed development complies with the provisions of
the RD-M Zone.
2. The proposed development is in conformance with the City of
Carlsbad Subdivision Ordinance 9050.
Page Two
Staff Report
2500 Navarra
Conditions of Approval:
1. A landscaping plan per RD-M requirements shall be submitted
to the Planning Department for review.
2. All fire hydrants and fire protection appurtenances shall
be constructed in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
3. All improvement plans shall conform to City of Carlsbad
Engineering Design Criteria and Standard Plans.
4. Improvement plans for water and sewer shall be approved
by the City of Carlsbad and the responsible special service
district.
5. Street lighting on Navarra Drive shall conform to require-
ments set by the City of Carlsbad.
Donald A. Agatep, Plannnng Directornn
Date: November 13, 1972
Name of Applicant: Praver Bros. Investments
Permit Applied For: Tentative Map
Location of Proposed Activity: Westerly terminus of Navarra Drive
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
I. Background Information.
1. Description of Proposed Activity.
The applicant proposes to construct 94 condominium units
on 4.22 acres fronting Navarra Drive in the La Costa Master
Plan area. Utilities, including gas, underground electric,
and full street improvements already exist. The three lots
to be subdivided have been graded. Deed restrictions on the
three lots will regulate the architecture of the structures
and will require landscaping provisions for the developments.
Zoning (R-3) was granted under the County of San Diego and
transferred to the City of Carlsbad when the La Costa area
was annexed to the City. Further information regarding
regulations for architecture, landscaping, off-street park-
ing, and building maintenance is on file in the Planning
Department as part of La Costa's CC & R provisions.
2. Description of Activity Area.
The area containing the proposed activity is a developing
neighborhood consisting of condominium projects on subdivided
lots. Construction is presently under way for several
condominium projects in the neighborhood. These developments
were issued building permits under the County. Navarra Drive
is a Cul-de-sac street with lots boarding both sides of the
street. The subdivision is surrounded on the North, West,
and South by the La Costa Golf Course, which offers the
neighborhood abundant open space area. A minimum of grading
is required for the condominium sites since architecture is
adapted to the existing landscape in the neighborhood.
11. Environmental Impact Analysis.
Yes No_
1. Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity? X_
2. Could the activity affect the use of a recre-
ational area, or area of important aesthetic
value?
3. Could the activity affect the functioning of
an established community or neighborhood?
4. Could the activity result in the displace-
ment of community residents?
5. Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the activity area unique, that is, not
found in other parts of the County, State,
or nation?
6. Could the activity significantly affect a
historical or archaelogical site or its
setti ng?
7. Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource?
8. Does the activity area serve as a habitat,
food source, nesting place, source of water,
etc. for rare or endangered wildlife or fish
species?
9. Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life?
10. Are there any rate or endangered plant species
in the activity area?
11. Could the activity change existing features
of any of the city 's bays, lagoons, or
tidelands?
12. Could the activity change existing features
of any of the City's beaches?
13. Gould the activity result in the erosion of
agricultural lands?
Yes No
14. Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify
development of already developed areas?
15. Will the activity require a variance from estab-
lished environmental standards (air, wster, noise,
etc.)?
16. Will the activity require certification, authori-
zation or issuance of a permit by any local, State,
or Federal environmental control agency? _
17. Will the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional use permit by the City?
18. Will the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal or ptentially hazardous materials?
19. Will the activity involve construction of facil-
ities on a slope of 25 per cent or greater?
20. Will the activity involve construction of facil-
ities in a flood plain?
21. Will the activity involve construction of facil-
ities in the area of an active fault?
22. Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of noise?
23. Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of dust?
24. Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
25. Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's
air or water resources? (Should note surface,
ground water, off-shore)
26. Will there be significant change to existing
land form?
(a) indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubid yards. grading has been completed
(b) percentage of alteration to the present
land form. NA ._
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes.
NA ._
27. Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or
streets?
III. Statement of No Significant Environmental Effects
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in
Section II, but you think the activity will have no signif-
icant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below:
Under 14. above
The area in the vicinity of the activity is a newly developed
residential neighborhood. Presently, several constructions
of condominiums are in progress. Since, the subdivided area
is a lot sales type of subdivision, and all streets and utilities
are constructed, an intermittant pattern of development is
occuring. The existence of the necessary utilities is thought
to be a primary source of encouragement for development, while
the actual construction of condominium projects would have a
secondary effect on growth in the area. All new projects in
the vicinity will, therefore, have some effect on encouraging
further development until the entire subdivision is built out.
It is believed that the affirmative answer to question 14
will not have a negative impact, since the pattern is established
and no ill effects are present from that pattern.
A proper assessment of the environmental impact in terms of
services can not be made until a significant population resides
in the neighborhood. Since, construction is rappidly taking
place, a significant population (one where service demands
are tangible) will exist within a short period of time. That
population will occur without this proposal, however, via the
construction already in progress.
IV. Comments or Elaborations to Any of the Questions in Section II.
This proposed activity requires the Environmental Impact
Assessment at an intermediate point in the development process.
Preliminary planning and zoning approvals have already been
granted, therefore negating any question as to the use of land
proposed in this activity.
SIGNED BY: / .«
E ft'o n J,,/ 01 i ng ho^Ji s e
DATE:
V. Conclus ions (To be Completed by the Planning Director)
Further information is required.
/\ It has been determined that the project will not have
significant environmental effects.
It has been determined that the project could have
significant environmental effects. An environmental impact
statement will be submitted on
BY:
Pla"nni 'Director or Representativ<
DATE RECEIVED: 11/I $/7*2-
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 857
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE
MAP FOR CARLSBAD TRACT 72-33
WHEREAS, the Carlsbad City Planning Commission did receive on
November 28, 1972, a Tentative Map, to be known as Carlsbad Tract
72-33, submitted by Praver Brothers Investment, owner and subdivi-
der, on property located in La Costa South Unit No. 1, 2500 Mavarra
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did consider the Tentative
Map as submitted, comprised of three (3) lots; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did take into consideration
the reports of the various City agencies and utility companies;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Tentative Map be
approved for the following reasons, and subject to the following
conditions and limitations:
Reasons of Approval:
1. The proposed development complies with the provisions of
the RD-M zone.
2. The proposed development is in conformance with the City of
Carlsbad Subdivision Ordinance 9050.
Conditions of Approval:
1. A landscaping plan per RD-M requirements shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for review.
2. All fire hydrants and fire protection appurtenances shall be
constructed in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
3. All improvement plans shall conform to City of Carlsbad
Engineering Design Criteria and Standard Plans.
4. Improvement plans for water and sewer shall be approved by the
City of Carlsbad and the responsible special service district.
5. Street lighting on Navarra Drive shall conform to requirements
set by the City of Carlsbad.
XX
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
29
30
31
32
o
AND FINALLY RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the City Council of the City of Carlsbad for its
attention, in the manner prescribed by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Planning Commission, held on the 28th day of November,
1972, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Dominguez, Dewhurst, Forman, Little,
Jose, Norman
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Palmateer
ELMER H. JOSE, JR., Chairman
ATTEST:
EDMOND W. DOMINGUEZ, Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 30281
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, APPROVING THE TENTATIVE
3 MAP FOR A 94-UNIT, 3-LOT CONDOMINIUM
DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN LA COSTA
4 SOUTH UNIT NO. 1. CARLSBAD TRACT 72-33.
5 (Praver Brothers Investment)
6
7 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad
8 on the 28th day of November, 1972, recommended to the City Counci
that the tentative map for a 94-Unit, 3-lot condominium develop-
10 ment, on property located in La Costa South Unit No. 1, Carlsbad
11 Tract 72-33, be approved; and
12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the
13 5th day of December, 1972, considered the recommendation of the
14 Planning Commission;
15 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
16 the City of Carlsbad that the City Council does hereby approve
17 said tentative map for a 94-unit, 3-lot condominium development
18 on property located in La Costa South Unit No. 1, Carlsbad Tract
19 72-33, subject to the following conditions:
20 1. A landscaping plan per RD-M requirements shall be
21 submitted to the Planning Department for review;
22 2. All fire hydrants and fire protection appurtenances
23 shall be constructed in accordance with Fire Department require-
24 ments;
25 3. All improvement plans shall conform to City of
26 Carlsbad Engineering Design Criteria and Standard Plans;
27 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer shall be
28 approved by the City of Carlsbad and the responsible special
29 service district; and
30 5. Street lighting on Navarra Drive shall conform to
31 requirements set by the City of Carlsbad.
32 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the subdivider shall furnish
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
the U. S. Post Office, Carlsbad, California, with a copy of the
final subdivision map.
AND FINALLY RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby
directed to place a copy of this resolution in the usual course
of mail, addressed to the subdivider at his address as shown on
the tentative map.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of
December, 1972, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Cmn. Dunne, McComas, Lewis, Chase and Frazee.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
MVID M. DUNNE, Mayor
City of Carlsbad,
Carlsbad, California
ATTEST:
E. ADAMS, CCity Clerk
(SEAL)
-2-