HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-05-10; City Council; 2043; Tentative Map CT 73-12 on property located on the north side of Jerez Court between Gibraltar Street and the westerly terminus of Jerez Court Applicant Donald R Gray Construction Company' CiTY OF CARLSBAD, CAL
Agenda Bill NO. 3,0 43' Date Ma^ 10'» 1973
_.i- --II-LJMJ i. ^ i_rr_
Referred Jo: CITY COUNCIL -- _ -
Subject: TENTATIVE MAP NO. CT 73-12 on property Submitted By:
.located on the north side of Jerez Court between •
Gtbralter Street and the westerly terminus of Jerez PLANNING COMMISSION
Court. APPLICANT: Donald R. Gray Construction Co.
t PROJECT NAME: Jerez Court.
• Statement of the Matter
•
The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting of May 8, 1973, considered the
request for approval of a Tentative Map for the development of a 24 unit condominium
project on 1.6 acres of land, located on the north side of Jerez Court between
Gibralter Street and the westerly terminus of Jerez Court, to be known as JEREZ COURT.
Resolution No. 900 was adopted by the Planning Commission approving the Tentative
• Map subject to the seven conditions outlined in the Resolution. Since this approval,
there is a 1.2 acre parcel which is to be used as open space. A revised tentative,
map plan has been included in this packet.
Exhibit
1. Affidavit'of Ownership
2. Staff Report dated May 8, 1973
3. Resolution No. 900
4. Applicant's Exhibits as revised
5. E.I.R. information
6. City Council Resolution
Staff Recommendations
Staff's recommendation is for approval as outlined in the report dated May 8, 1973
with the exception that the revised plan be the one approved.
- n May 10, 1973AS No. • Date: ^
City Manager's Recommendation
Concur with recommendations of PIanning. Commission
Counci1'Ac tion
.6-5-73 Resolution #3139 approving the Tentative Map o'f CT 73-12,
Jerez Court, was adopted.
-2-
.'PLICATION FOR APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
EXECUTED AT
(City! .
DATE Ma'rch 30Y 1973' '
(State)
OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT:
Donald R. Gray
Donald R. Gray Construction Co. , Inc.
(Print Name)
.(Signature)
15445 Ventura Boulevard
(Mailing Address)
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
(City and State)
(Area Code) (213) 783-8387
{Telephone Number)~
SUBSCRIBED'AND SWORN TO BEFORE HE THIS
(Notary Public)
DAY-OF
OFFICIAL SEAL
CURTIS R. CLARK
WOTflii, e./U.IC CALIfOKNIA
MIN^IHAl OFFICt til
SAN DltGO JOUNTY .
My Commission -Expires M;y 18, 1976
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ANALYSIS FOR
MAYS, 1973
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
TENTATIVE TRACT CASE NO.
DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION
The applicant DONALD GREY, is requesting approval of a one (1) lot subdivision
to allow development of a 24 unit condominium project on 1.6 acres of land,
located on the north side of Jerez Court between Gibralter Street and the
westerly terminus of Jerez Court.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The subject Tentative Map is a portion of the La Costa Master Development Plan
adopted by the City Council on August 1, 1972.
Tentative Map as proposed is in conformance with the recommended R-2 densities
as indicated in this Master Plan. A more complete description of the project
in its relation to surrounding land uses and La Costa developmental concepts
may be found within the zone change-Master Plan (MP-6) information concerning
the La Costa Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CONSIDERATIONS
The Planning Director has determined that this development will not have a
significant environmental impact, and therefore, no further environmental
considerations are required to be made.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff recommends that this tentative map, Carlsbad Tract 73-12 be approved
for the following reasons:
1. The tentative map is in conformance with the La Costa Master
Development Plan as adopted by the City Council on August 1, 1972.
2. The tentative map is in keeping with the adopted Carlsbad
General Plan.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1, AH Improvements shall be \r\ confonmance wtth the City of Carlsbad Design
Criteria and Standards.
CT 73-12
Page 2.
2. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall meet the requirements
of the respective service districts providing services.
3. All on-site fire protection appurtenances shall be constructed in
accordance with fire department standards and requirements.
4. Park-in-Lieu fees and/or park land dedication shall be granted to the
City prior to recording of the final map. Parks and Recreation Department
shall make the determination as to which lands will be accepted as dedication.
5. The development shall meet all requirements of the Department of Public
Health.
6. All utilities, including provisions for cable T.V. shall be placed
underground.
7. It is strongly urged that the applicant work together with the Encinitas
and San Dieguito Union High School Districts to deve-op some mutual agreement
regarding the impact on schools due to this development.
^PROVED
..7 ,J. IT. KING,/
^ Jr. Planner f
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
RESOLUTION NO. 900
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, SETTING
FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RELATIVE TO A SUBDIVISION MAP (CT 73-12) ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF JEREZ
COURT BETWEEN GIBRALTAR STREET AND THE WESTERLY
TERMINUS OF JEREZ COURT.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad did
receive a verified application from DONALD R. GRAY CONSTRUCTION
CO., requesting approval of a Tentative Map to provide for
development of a 24-unit condominium project on 1.6 acres of land,
located on the north side of Jerez Court between Gibraltar Street
and the westerly terminus of Jerez Court, and more particularly
described as :
Lots 370, 371, 372 and 373 of La Costa
South Unit No. 5 per Map No. 6600, City
of Carlsbad, San Diego County, State of
California; and
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements
of the "City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of
1972" and has been declared to have a "non-significant" impact on
the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did take into consideration
the Tentative Map as submitted, and the reports of the various
reviewing agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the subject
Tentative Map does substantially comply with the City of Carlsbad
subdivision regulations, and the State of California Subdivision
Map Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Carlsbad, that it does hereby recommend approval to
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, of the herein described
Tentative Map, CT 73-12, subject to the following conditions:
1. All improvements shall be in conformance with the
City of Carlsbad Design Criteria and Standards.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
2. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems
shall meet the requirements of the respective
service districts providing services.
3. All on-site fire protection appurtenances shall
be constructed in accordance w.ith fire department
standards and requirements.
4. Park-in-lieu fees and/or park land dedication shall
be granted to the City prior to recording of the
Final Map. Parks and Recreation Department shall
make the determination as to which lands will be
accepted as dedication.
5. The development shall meet all requirements of the
Department of Public Health.
6. All utilities, including provisions for cable TV
shall be placed underground.
7. The applicant shall work together with the Encinitas
and San Dieguito Union High School Districts to
develop some mutual agreement regarding the impact
on schools due to this development.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Planning Commission held on the 8th day of May,
1973, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Dominguez, Dewhurst, Forman, Palmateer,
Norman, Jose and Little
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
E.W. Dominguez, Chairman
DONALD A. AGATEP, Secretary
f Y 0 F CARL S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1972
ENDORSEMENT OF COMPLIANCE -
APPLICANT R,
TYPE OF PERMIT . MAP
FILE NO.£T 73-12
ADDRESS AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY -
I declare that I have examined the file relating to the
above captioned activity and have determined that all pro-
ceedings required for compliance with the City of Carlsbad
Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 are complete.
DONALD
PLANNING DIRECTOR
Dated:
/ - J-4444 •
^-VROHMEHTAL IMPACT ACS£5*% I Carlsbad Tract 73-12
V .^ v j
Date: March 29, 1973
Name of Applicant: Donald R. Gray
Pennit Applied For:
Location of Proposed Activity: The site is located on the•northerly
side of Jerez Court at the intersection of Gibralter Street in
La Costa South Unit No. 5, Map No. 6600.
I. Background Information. " . . .. .
1. Give a brief description of the proposed activity. .
The applicant proposed to regrade the existing lots in his project,
and construct three condominium buildings with eight units in each
building. All parking will be on-site. Access tothe covered .
parking structures will be by a driveway on Gibralter Street and a
driveway on Jerez Court. No parking structures will have direct
access to or face the public streets.
2. Describe the activity area, including distinguishing
natural and mamnade characteristics.
The activity area is comprised of four graded lots in La Costa South-
Unit No. 5. The site is located at the southeast corner of the La
Costa Golf Course and southerly of the westerly terminus of. San Marcos
Canyon. The site is surrounded by similiarly zoned and graded lots
except of the portion that'is adjacent to the Golf Course.
f"* APPENDIX J. ' ' • -\,...^ ; "**"•*<*
11. Environmental Impact Analysis.
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the
appropriate space.
Yes . No_
1. Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity? X •
2. Could the activity affect the use of a re-
creational area, or area of important
aesthetic value? . x
3. Could the activity affect the functioning . .
of an established community or neighbor-
hood? .. x
. 4. Could the activity result in the displace-
ment of community residents? • X.
5. Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the activity area unique, that is, not . • .
found in other parts of the Coun.ty, State,
ornation? ' • X
6. Could the acti vi ty si gni f i cantly affect a
historical or archaelogical site or its
setting? _ X
7. Could the activity significantly affect
•the potential use, extraction, or con-
servation of a scarce natural resource? ; __ _ ' _ X_
8. Does the activity area serve as a habitat,
food source, nesting place, source of water,
etc. for rare or endangered wildlife or
fish species? „___. _ ^L
9. Could the activity significantly affect
fish, wildlife or plant life? • . _ . ________ _ X
10. Are there any rare or endangered plant .
species in the activity area? • . ' / •
11. Could the activity change existing features
• of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or
tidelands? X
• . Yes Ngi
12. Could the activity change existing features
of any of the City's beaches? . X
13. Could the activity result in the erosion .
or elimination of agricultural lands? x
14. Could the activity serve to encourage -
development of presently undeveloped
areas or intensify development of already
developed areas? •_ X
15. Will the activity require a variance.from
established environmental standards (air,
water, noise, etc)? X_
16. Will the activity require certification, . . .
authorization or issuance of a permit '.
by any local. State or Federal en- ... " .
vironmental control'agency? x
17. Will the activity require issuance of
a variance or conditional use permit
by the City? x
18.Will the activity involve the application,
use, or disposal of potentially hazardous
materials? ' X_
19. Will the activity involve construction
of facilities in a flood plain? _ X
20. Will the activity involve construct!-
of facilities on a slope of 2.5 per d
on
cent
or greater?
21. Will the activity involve construction .
of facilities in the area of an active .
fault? X .
22. Could the activity resuit in the
generation of significant amounts
o f n o i s e ? • . ; x
23. Could the activity result in the gen- .
eration of significant amounts of dust? X
24. Will the activity invol ve' the burning
of brush, trees, or other materials? X
25. Could the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any portion of the
region's air or water resources? (Should
note surfaces ground water, off-shore) " ' X
i Yes fro
26. V/ii;^ >re be a significant C!K ^ to
exisciw?f' land form? • . X
(a) indicate estimated grading to be
done in cubic yards.
(b) percentage of alteration to the
present land form.
(c) maximum height of cut or fill
slopes. 10 feet
27. Will the activity result in substantial
increases in the use of utilities,
sewers, drains or streets? : . ' X
III. • State o f N o Sigm'ficant Environmen t a 1 E' f f ects^
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in
Section II, but youthink the activity will -have no significant enviro-
mental effects, indicate your reasons below: •' ..•-• •' .-•--
"27) The streets and other public utilities in this'area are not presently being "
used. This will be the first building in this area, therefore, it will
substantially increase the use of public facilities in this area.
IV. Comments or Elaborations to Any of the Questions in Section II
~(lf additional space is needed for answering any questions.,
attach additional sheets as may beneeded.)
Signature: '_'-r-~ .- -- ^>
(Person colrFpl eting report)
Date signed: ^ 4*~/-73
Conclus ions (To be completed by the Planning Director)
Place a check in the appropriate box.
Further information is required.
It has been determined that the project will not have
significant environmental effects. ' •• ..
It has been determined that the project could have
significant environmental effects. An environmental
impact statement must be submitted by the following
date,
Date Received
^•^S.V^V-\G7~-~S^ U r--'"/ * '^ ''• l;''<' -'^•r^ >"-
Jv^lfeiSH;)) C =^li^^;;Vr^llifelS£:Vy -.-.-•xJ v ' j »1 - ••• ' 1 r-' ...«X .. ', ; .--.-• N-~ «.• V •-•-'• ..v-.r->N^'
^H^iiw^-.oH»&f^rtmm&s?,»"-» ' / '•' -• I / ••'* i f Vj"" I1•- s -1 •: <^ > -J-• *V ^ "j A //, u ^/: •f^v//7 /•• ^l~-l 1i:',\ ' /<;»_. '. *--.^-v^^^V
•^;/-i^ fj
^^ \\ o, V i ^f^ t-f \ ^^ftTCi^N^ W"^ Y ^ to?!n%c^c\^%^^^^7&^»i^v^^V/M^;'-S^l^i^^^®^•-;-~-^-A / / TT^TA ^>:-D A rs>r-<,">- =
-i—^4—±i-*3L**zZ?^&L^jr'®!ir^ ^^7 \v^°<^^-x V^^rPV-^P^tTP^^^
\r~^^S^~Ci^iVt >j'iA!ft-'^'^"~'f:p "' '•'.fc--r'v^t^^^j::;
^vJ^y/>-- 0^^%^/w^.T^WJ^^^^^F-®^^(K l^Sti^'fY^^^w
v
UMION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
2151 NEWCASTLE, CARDIFF, CALIFORNIA 92007 714-753-6*91
April 5, 1973 .
l? P 1? T v t? nI2i Li Hi 1 V Hi U
APR e 1373
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Department
Mr. Donald A. Agatep
Director of Planning
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Dear Mr. Agatap:
I have been asked to comment on Carlsbad Tract Nos. .73-12..and 73-15 that is a
proposed condominium project in the La Costa area. All school facilities in
the San Dieguito Union High School District are extremely overcrowded and
operating on an extended day schedule. The Board of Trustees has adopted a
policy calling on the financial assistance of developers in providing temporary .
and other facilities to accommodate the students generated from the many new
dwelling units currently under construction within the district.
At present, there is no high school site in that portion of the San Dieguito
area that is located within the boundaries of the city limits of Carlsbad. It
seems apparent from the rapid growth in that area that school facilities will
eventually be required for students living in that area. A school site had been
selected when that particular area was part of the County of San Diego but has
since been eliminated by the city of Carlsbad. San Dieguito High School District
remains opposed to any additional housing units within that area of the school
district until some provision is made for a site and other school facilities that
would serve the students that would be generated from those dwelling units.
I have been supplied with a map from the Rick Engineering Company that has located
some potential school sites in the area. Until such time as the sites are made
available and the district is financially able to provide the facilities, we
must oppose further housing developments.
Sincerely,
William A. Berrier
Superintendent
bfs
cc: Mr. David Thompson, President, Board of Trustees
Mr. John Daily
BOARD OF TRUSTEES:
ADMINISTRATION:
David H. Thompson,
President
O. B. Sholders,
Vice President
William A. Berrier,
Superintendent
Douglas M. Fouq'jet,
Clerk
Robert A. Morton,
Assistant Superintendent
E. Donald Frick Don W. Mitchell
John J. Dally,
Business Manager
nr—i "'"i
: .1
j <. .: i WQODSIDES/KUBOTA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CUNCULTINO
ENGINEERS
2965 Roosevelt St. • P. O. Box 1095 • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (714) 729-1194
April 9, 1973
RECEIVED
Mr. Donald A. Agatep «pp
Director of Planning *rM U WJ
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue CITY OF CARLSBAD
Carlsbad, California 92008 Planning Department
Subject: Carlsbad Tract 73-12
Lots 370-373 La Costa South No. 5, Map No. 6600
Carlsbad Municipal Water District
Dear Mr. Agatep:
This office has reviewed the subject tract and has the following
comments:
1. The subject subdivision is within the retail service area
of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
2. This project will be required to comply with the rules and
regulations for water service to condominiums of the Carlsbad
Municipal Water District.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please
contact this office.
ry triily yours ,
John R. Pierce
Project Engineer
cc: Carlsbad Municipal Water District
JRP/sp
In Orange County, Santa Ana
7334
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
o 14
CD _..2 I is*< .
OIL y 5 IfiQ O | ^ -1-0
°t >£
50^ 17
LL • 5<v. w
z "! 8 d -[ QUJ Z tN rf -LOo K "~ mHO co
cc<o
o
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
RESOLUTION NO, 3139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
TENTATIVE MAP (CT 73-12) FOR DEVELOPMENT
OF A 24-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 1.6
ACRES OF LAND, ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF .JEREZ-COURT-BETWEEN-.GIBRALTAR
STREET AND THE WESTERLY TERMINUS OF JEREZ COURT.
WHEREAS, on the 8th day of May, 1973, the Carlsbad
City Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 900,
recommending to the City Council that Tentative Subdivision
Map (CT 73-12) be conditionally approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on
the 5th day of June, 1973, considered the recommendation
of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said Tentative Map has complied with the
requirements of the "City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection
Ordinance of 1972" and has been declared to have a "non-
significant" impact on the environment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad, that Tentative Map CT 73-12, is
hereby approved, subject to the execution and/or fulfillment
of the following conditions:
1. All improvements shall be in conformance with the
City of Carlsbad Design Criteria and Standards.
2. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems
shall meet the requirements of the respective
service districts providing services.
3. All on-site fire protection appurtenances shall
be constructed in accordance with fire department
standards and requirements.
4. Park-in-lieu fees and/or park land dedication shall
be granted to the City prior to recording of the
Final Map. Parks and Recreation Department shall
make the determination as to which lands will be
accepted as dedication.
5. The development shall meet all requirements
of the Department of Public Health.
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
6. A]] utilities, including provisions for cable TV
shall be placed underground.
7. The applicant shall be encouraged to work together
with the Encinitas and San Dieguito Union High School
Districts to develop some mutual agreement regarding
the impact on schools due to this development.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the Carlsbad City Council held on the 5th day of June, 1973,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Cmn. McComas, Lewis, Chase, and Frazee.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Cmn. Dunne.
GLENN E. McComas, Vice Mayor
ATTEST:
// MM<&&
MM^AR^T E. ADAMS, Ctity Clerk
(sealf
2.