HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-08-07; City Council; 2104; La Costa Land Co Meadowbrook 1 - Request for assignment of portion of City sewage and Treament plant capacity rights to San Marcos County Water District to serve 303-unit subdivisionTHE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Agenda Bill No. 2/ Q*f ^Date Aug. l, .1973
(.
Referred To: £f 0 £/
Subject : Submitted By:
La Costa Land Co. Meadowbrook #1; request for Public Works Director
assignment of portion of City sewage treatment
plant capacity rights to San Marcos County Water
1~H cj-t-Ti fit- to Hp>TVf» 303— unit Rnhdivision
Statement of the Matter
A portion of the La Costa area (Meadowbrook #1) within the City limits is
also within the San Marcos County Water District (SMCWD) . Said District
provides sewer service to the area. The District has declared a moratorium
on all future sewer connections in that the District is at (or hae exceeded)
capacity rights in the Encina Treatment Plant.
The City has been requested (see Exhibit "A") to assign a portion of the
City's unused capacity to the SMCWD for the express purpose of allowing
sewer connections in the planned 303 dwelling unit development known as
Meadowbrook Unit #1.
A summary of existing and project flows at the Encina Plant, by agency,
is attached as Exhibit "B".
Exhibit
A. letter from La Costa Land Co. dated July 9, 1973.
B. Encina Water' Pollution Control Facility Monthly Report of Existing and
Projected Flows of Participating Agencies, report for month of July 1973.
Staff Recommendations
AB Wo. ' • Date: Aug. 7, 1973
City Manager's Recommendation • •
This agenda bill results from two meetings-with La Costa officials
at which time they pointed out that a development now under way is
within the .San Marcos County Water District. It is a matter of
general knowledge that the San Marcos .County Water District has
placed a moratorium'on sewer connections, and as a result, this
La Costa development cannot be guaranteed sewer connections for
the above mentioned development. La Costa is asking the Carlsbad
City Council to assign a portion of their sewer capacity rights
to the San Marcos County Water District to service the La Costa
development in question. At the discussions it was stated that
there is a definite policy determination to be'made and that the
matter would be brought before the City Council for discussion.
This matter, therefore, is b.eing placed on the agenda for discussion
purposes by the City Council, and if the City Council looks with
favor on such an assignment the matter should, be directed back to
•the staff for further discussions,, and also discussions with the
San Marcos County Water District to work out any details prior
to an official document being drawn'up. There will Be considerable
legal work attached. Before,,;such work takes place there definitely
should be an indication as.to whether the Council desires t6 make
this assignment of capacity'. If the Council does look with, favor
upon an assignment of capacity, the staff can compile a recommendation
for the City Council.
Council Action
8-8-73 The Council approved in principie -the assignment of a portion of
Carlsbad's sewer capacity to San Marcos County Water District, and
instructed the staff to return.to the Council with an agreement
to implement the assignment by the first meeting in September, 1973,
re
COSTA DEL MAR ROAD»RANCHO LA COSTA. CALIFORNIA » 92OOS » AREA CODE 7 14 » TELEPHONE 729-9111
July 9, 1973
HONORABLE MAYOR DUNNE
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
City of Carlsbad ..;...- •
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Gentlemen r
At its meeting of June 4, 1973, the Board of Directors
of the San Marcos Connty Water District adopted a resolution
of moratorium on all future sewer connections within that
District. A portion of Rancho La Costa lies both within the
San Marcos District and the City of Carlsbad.
An area of immediate concern to us is the project known
as MEADOWBROOK UNIT #1 , a 303-dwelling planned development,
$;lii(Jli "licit! liad "€he approval of your Council and Commission.
The project is now in final design and grading plans have been
submitted to and reviewed by your City Engineer. We anticipate
that move-ins would occur in late 1973 and early 1974.
Apparently the zoned limit on the ability of the San Marcos
County Water District to serve this as well as other property
is the limit that that agency has on its capacities within
the Encina Plant. Further, we understand that all agencies
contributing to the Encina Plant are still below the rated
capacities permitted.
It is our hope that the City of Carlsbad might be able to
assign a small part of its capacity to San Marcos for the
purpose of covering the needs of this particular development.
We anticipate and request that such coverage would apply only
until such time as the San Marcos County Water District can
once again accept connections into its system.
Very truly yours ,
.
Irving Roston, Vice President
LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
IR/tc
Exhibit "A1
ENCINA WATER POLLUTION' CONTROL FACILITY - MONTHLY REPORT OF
-'EXISTING AND PROJECTED FLOWS OF PARTICIPATING AGENCIES
Report for Month of July L973 COPY •H
X!X
COLUMN
r
oncy
STA SANITATION DISTRICTo
TY OF CARLSBAD
IENA SANITATION DISTRICT ;
IN MARCOS. COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
:UCADIA COUNTY WATER: DISTRICT
sCLN'Ub SANITARY DISTRICT
!TY OF OCEANSIDE
3TALS
New Conn,
(1) for
Past Month
22
29 ;••
17 Conn.
18.5 E.D.U
25
99
192
Est. Add,
Flow from '
New Conn.
(2) (3)
0.006
0.007
0.005
0.007
0.028 ••
w
.-..
0.053
Projected New
•Ccnn. for
Next 6 nos.
600
795
._ 90
... 350
400
-
Ml
2,235
list. Add.
Flow for
Next 6
ir.os.
6.168'
0.191' •
0.025
0.098
0.112
-
- •
0.59^
Agency
Flow for
Previous1'
Month
'2.A67
i.5^5
0.205
1.212
..0.603^
0
*
0.099
6.131
»
Est. Total
Flow for
This Month
2.473
1.552
0.210
t
1.219
' 0.631
0
0.100
6.185
Projected
Total Flow
in 6 rr.os.
2.635
1.736 "
• '
0.230
1.310
0.715
0
0.100
6.726
•r-
) All connections converted to equivalent residential units
>) Equivalent residential unit equal to 280 gpd (3.5 people x SO g/p/d)
i) All flows in Billion gallons nor day , ,, • . . ' V
vy *?<603 sngd to Encina'j 0;lll isigd to La Costa,- total 0^714 . • "• -4
' • - » *
t . * • *
' s ' ' * • * .
Capacity
Rights Of
Acer.cv
2.67.
2.26-
0.62
1.20
:,l1 1
0
0
0
6.73
d)Z//'/&£-
rro;cc;cd Net
Coar.cctior. •
For 12 r.r,s.yi
I-st. Flow >
200 ^^l
^^ 2.72J
1.200 .^
^^^^^1.85)
130 ' .^
, ^^-^
500 .^'
^x^l.3521
1,200 ^^
^^^1.05
o ^s*
^^^^0
0 ^S*
^^-^0
3.530^^^
^*-**"^ 7.23*4
t