HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-10-16; City Council; 2175; REQUEST ACCEPTANCE FINAL EIRW
Agenda Bill Mo. ^/•/S"
Referred T/TT CITY COUNCIL
OF CARLSBAD, CAUF^NlA
A
Subject: Request for Acceptance of Final E.I.R"., adopTTbrf
of a..Specific Plan (SP-119) and approval of a Tentative Mas
>ate
nt(j[CT 73j-20j) to allow construction of 26 lot condominium develop
on property generally located southerly of and.adjacent to La Cost
Avenue, immediately west of the present westerly most extension of
^ known
)ber 16, 197*
Levante btr
Statement
26t- tO
of the Matter
as
jej
±*Y>k:.*>
iOOiUi
^
At the regular meeting of September 25, 1973, the Planning Commission did hold-
a Public Hearing to consider the Final E.I.R.-167, Specific Plan-119 and
Tentative Map CT 73-20, submitted by LA COSTA LAND COMPANY, to allow for a 26
lot condominium development, on property generally located southerly of and
adjacent to La Costa Avenue, immediately westerly of th'e present westerly most
extension of Levante Street, said project to be known, as SPANISH VILLAGE WEST.
After hearing all persons wishing to .speak at this Public Hearing, the Planning
Commission did Accept the Final Environmental Impact Report #167 as had been
presented. They also adopted Resolution No. 962 approving Tentative Map (CT 73-20).,
and adopted Resolution Mo. 970 adopting the Specific Plan #119 for this project,
with conditions amended, from the Staff Report dated Sept. 25, "1973.
Certification of Ownership •
Staff Report dated 9-25-73
FinaT E.I.R. #167
Applicant'Exhibit ; • ,
Resolution No. 952 approving Tentative Map (CT 73-20)
Resolution No. 970 adopting Specific Plan (SP-119) '
City Council Resolution No "
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5.
7.
8.. City Council Resolution Nti .'__g'£jp,
Staff Recommendations to the City Manager
Recommendations from Planning Commission are more clearly set out in Resolutions
attached. -
A
r
Oi-J
AB NO.Q Date:October 1(5, 1973
City Ma na gar's Reconimenda ti on
This Is a continuation of a.unit that- is_ partially, underway
at this time. Please no.te that Olivenhai'n Water Distri-c.t has
a letter stating that they can supply water to this project.'
The same thing I'B true of the sewer.. I believe they actually
irfean that by the time this project is .completed, they will have
.expanded their facilities and obtained capacity in the sewer"plant
'which would permit 'development of., the property.
Covncil'Action
c
Ssecific/Master PI?.? Application Page Two
III. EXISTING ZONE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
HAS A MASTER PLAN BEEN APPROVED?
P.C.
Yes. xx . No.
DATE:June 2.7, 1972
OWNER AMD/OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGEMT
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) SS
CITY OF Carlsbad )
I> (we), Burton L. Kramer
my(name)
declare to the best of
(my, our )~
and correct under the penalty of purjury:
_be1ng duly sworn depose and
Jcnoviledge that the foregoing is true
EXECUTED AT
DATE
Carlsbad,California
(City)(State)
(Month)* (Day) (Year)
APPLICANT, OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT:La Costa Land Company
BY: Burton L. Kramer, Vice-President
(Print Name)',
L-
(Signature)•
Costa Del Mar Road
'(Mailing Address)
Carlsbad,California 92008
(City and State)[Zip)
( 714 ) 729-9111
(Area Code)(Telephone Number)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 3rd DAY OF May
Sondra K. Muter
(Notary pUFffc")
OFFICIAL SEAL
3& SONDRA K. MUTER
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT FOR
SEPTEMBER 25, 1973
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT ON: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN
. CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE MAP.
CASE NOS: EIS-167
SP-119
CT 73-20
APPLICANT: B. K. KRAMER, FOR, LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, California
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Background: These items have been continued on several occasions at the
request of the applicant, to permit a revision of the proposed development. Said
revisions have been completed and a revised developrcent plan has been submitted.
As Tentative Map No. 72-24, the Planning Commission and City Council did, in
late 1972 and early 1973, approve the development of a 140 acre parcel in the La
Costa area. As a part of that approval, a 36 acre single-family development known
as Spanish Village Unit No. 1 was approved with a total of 130 lots, the actual
development is occuring at a total of 107 lots. The applicant is now requesting
to develop the second phase of.the overall development consisting of two units
with a total of 1026 d.u. Said phase, containing approximately 96 acres, is
located southerly of and adjacent to La Costa Avenue, immediately westerly of the
present westerly most extension of Levante Street. Said property, somewhat
irregular in shape, does have a small frontage of approx. 606 ft. on El Camino Real.
B- Request: That the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council
of an E.I.R., Specific Plan for a 26 lot condominium development witti a lot of
1026 d.u. and a Tentative Map with 28 lots on a portion of S.35 {
and S2, T13S R4W, San Bernardino Meridian, City of Carlsbad.
36, T125, R4W,
C. Zoning and General Plan
1. Zoning:Existing: P-C
Proposed: P-C (S.P. & T.M.)
Adjacent: North: P-C
East:- R-2, RD-M & P-C
South: County A-l-(8)
West: C-2 ?, Co-ity A-l (8)
2 General Plan: The La Costa Master Plan as approved by Planning
Commission Resolution 808 and City Council Resolution 2058 & Ordinance 9322,
indicates a majority of the property to be potential medium high density
residential with a maximum of 14 d.u. per acre. A small portion adjacent to El
Camino Real is indicated to be potential high density residential with 20 d.u.
per acre. In addition, an elementary school site and park site are indicated :on the subject property. The proposed density of 14 d.u./net acre in the medium
high density area and/the 20 d.u./net acre in the high density area does conform
to the La Costa Master Plan.
N
II: CONSIDERATION OF E.I.R. MO. 167
A. ,Summary: The .draft EIR was received May 8, 1973. A letter was sent
by staff to the Applicant's consultant indicating certain deficiencies. An
amendment letter providing additional information was presented in June. The
final draft EIR should be considered to include both these items. In that the
immediate indicated development is the preparation of the land for sale as
condominium lots with the potential number of unit's, staff can not evaluate the
ultimate project-in terms of"the total effects on the environment. Therefore,
it is recommended that the environmental consideration be divided into two stages.
At this time, as many environmental considerations as possible should be completed.
As each lot developes in the future, the specific impacts of the precise de-
velopment be presented as an amendment at that time.
The draft EIR, as amended, does adequately express the full range
of environmental impacts as can be possibly known at this stage. Any concern
expressed by staff in the specific discussion will be with regard to the
matter of emphasis or future elaboration rather than completely rewriting the
draft EIR. In reviewing the draft EIR,- the relevant issues that should be kept
in mind are:
1. The impacts of the development in terms of grading and drainage.
2. The mitigating measures proposed to preserve the sites between
its initial preparation and the specific development.
3. The development, in terms of street and pa-d locations, did receive
an approval as a part of the consideration of Spanish Village Unit No. 1 (CT 72-24).
Therefore, in terms of drainage and public utilities, the tv/o developments are
dependent upon each other.
B. Corrections:
The applicant has~ revised the draft EIR to include the Amendment letter
and the changes that resulted from the revised development plan. The staff's
evaluation will be on the basis of the revised draft EIR.
C* Acceptability of Draft Report: The draft, as amended, titled "Spanish
Village West", proposed by the La Costa Land Company and prepared by Rick Engineering
Company, was accepted by the Planning Director as a'prel •'•-•'.•^'^" r-.r°. TMS report .
"\s forwarded to the following agencies for comments'
1. Department of Agriculture.
2. L.A.F.C.O.
". County of San Diego Parks and Rec."
4. Comprehensive Planning Organization
5. State of California, Dept. of Fish and Game
6. San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
7. San Diego County Sanitation and Flood Control.
No written response has been received.
D- Final E.I.R.: The final EIR will include the draft EIR as amended
and the staff comments below. Rather than repeating the information contained
in the draft EIR, staff will only commend to enlarge upon or-to correct the
draft EIR as amended.
1. Project: "The total number of condominium units proposed in' the
project is 1026 on a total of 96 gross acres. The overall gross density is
10.68 d.u.
2. The Environmental Setting: The environmental survey for the total
La Costa area should be utilized as a part of this consideration.
3. Mitigation Measures: The mitigating measures should have included
the immediate landscaping and all irrigation of all slopes created to guarantee
their preservation. In addition, wherever possible, all slopes of 25% or greater
could have been preserved. The movement of dirt has been somewhat reduced as
a result of the revised plan.
• 4- Alternatives: The potential alternatives are limited for the parcel
in that a previous commitment for the extension of Levante Street and Anillo Way,
require that a majority of the grading proposed to be done whether the indicated
Unit 2 is developed or not. Therefore, the potential lot layout is limited.
However, this does not limit the range of densities within the established lot
pattern. In. that the previously approved La Costa Master Plan has further
invited the land .use alternatives to residential and specific densities, ^even
the densities possible are limited.
E. Staff Recommendation on the E.I.R.
1. That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the
Final EIR BE APPROVED to include:
a. the amended draft EIR '
b. Any response received from those agencies notified.
c. Any public input received as a part of the public hearing
held regarding this EIR
Justification is based upon:
a. In that a land sales program is proposed, the development to occur
is only estimated, these materials do adequately express the total effect of the
proposed development on the environment'.
2. That the Planning Commission, requir.e.,,that an amendment to this
final EIR b1 pr~"/icbd for each lot when'the precise development has been de-
III. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO.' SP-119
A. Description of Project: The applicant is proposing to develope the
subject property into a 23 -lot subdivision with the lots to be sold for future
development. The subdivision will contain a total of 85.7 net acres and will
consist of 25 residential lots, a 10 acre site to be reserved for a school site
and a 4.9 acre park site.- In addition, easements consisting of an 16.8 acre
open space easement to the City and a 2.5 acre easement to S.D.G. & E. are' •
proposed. •- " . •
Access is proposed to be provided by extending Anillo Way and Levante
Street through the property to intersect with El Camino Real. Anillo Hay is
proposed to have "a 60 ft. right of way and Levante Street a 60 ft. right of
v/ay until it intersects with Anillo Way, when it will widen to 84 ft. right of
way to El Camino Real.
The indicated densities on the proposed lots are as follows:
ACREAGE DENSITY
LOTS
108
109
no
in
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126 '
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
GROSS
2.2
2.1
2.4
3.3
2.1
2.7
1.7
2.2
1.6
3.1
1.5
3.2
5.3
2.3
7.0
1.3
1.4
9.0
7.4
1.9
1.4
1.1
1.5
2.3
1 .
NET
2.2
1.7
1.7
2.6
2.1
1.9
1.7
2.2
1.6
3.1
1.5
3.2
5.3
2.3
7.0
1.3
1.4
9.0
7.4
1.9
1.4
1.1
1.5
2.3
1.8
i . 'f
GROSS
20 d.u.
16.19
14.16
11.03
14.
9.96
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14 •
14
14
14
"•' 4
NET
20 d.u.
20 "
20
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14 .
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
TOTAL UNITS
44
34
34 -
36 '
29
26
23
30
22
43
21
44
74* *
32
98
18
19
126
103
26
19
15
21
32
25
19
Subtotals: 73.
School Site 17
(Lot 134
Park Site
( Lot 135) 5
Public Streets
TOTALS
20 Gross Acres
.32 Ac.
.48 Ac.
N/A
96 Acres
70.60 Net Acres
10.00 ac.
4.9 Ac.
10.50 AC.
85.50 Acres
14.01 O.U.
N/A
N/A
it
10.68 d.u
14.53 d.u. *
N/A
• N/A
it
12.0 d.u.
1026 d.
N/A
N/A
ii
* 1026
u.
D
* Due to Lot configuration and Ordinance requirements, the decimal place units have
been removed. Thus, the total units would be reduced to approx. 1013 d.u. for
the proposed lot configuration.
B. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission recommend to the
'City Council that the Specific Plan BE APPROVED . Justification is based upon:
1. Conformance of the Plan to the General Plan commitment as established
by the La Costa Master Plan.
2. Conformance of plan to zoning ordinance considerations for property
located in the P-C Zone District. •
3. The size and location of the subject property is considered to be
sufficient for the proposed development.-
C. Conditions of Approval: Any approval should be subject to the following
conditions:
1. The approval of Specific Plan is granted for the land described
in the application and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the
plot plan submitted labeled Final Revised Exhibit A, dated Sept. 17, 1973.
The location of all buildings, fences, signs, roadways, parking areas,
landscaping and other facilities or features shall be located substantially
as shown on the plot plan labeled Final Revised Exhibit A, dated Sept. 17,
1973, except or unless indicated otherwise herein.
2. Prior to the development of lots 108-135, a specific plan of the pro-
posed development shall be submitted to the Planning Commission and City
Council for consideration and approval.
3. Prior to the issuance of any permits on lots 108-133, a tentative
map shall be submitted to the City for consideration and approval. .
4. Any minor change may be approved by the Planning Director. Any
substantial change will require *>• :-;'iv;! of an application for an
amendment to be considered by '•.'•".^ ••-* 'ommission.
5. All requirements of at:' ',..• •• .•' ;; •••• regulation of the STate of
California, City of Carlsbad, and any other governmental entity, shall
be compl ied with. ' • "
6. No signs or advertising of any type whatsoever shall be erected or
installed until plans therefore have been approved by the City of CArlsbad.
7. Prior to obtaining any permits, and within 30 days hereof, the
applicant shall file with the Secretary of the Planning Commission written
acceptance of the conditions stated herein.
8. • Compliance with and execution of all conditions listed hereon shall
be necessary, unless otherwise specified, prior to obtaining final building
--inspection -clearance. Deviation from this requirement shall be permitted
only by written consent of the Planning Director.
9. A detailed landscape and sprinkler plan prepared by a landscape
architect shall be submitted to the Planning Director for consideration and
approval. Said plan shall be for all slope areas within the development.
10. Prior to inspection clearance, all landscaping shall be installed.
Said landscaping shall, at all times, be maintained in a manner acceptable
to the Planning Director.
11. All utilities, including electrical, telephone and cable television,
shall be installed underground and/or shall be completely concealed from
view.
12. All public improvements shall be made in conformity with the
subdivision ordinance and other City standards, to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer, without cost to the City of Carlsbad, and free
of all liens and encumbrances.
13. Prior' to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall enter into
a mutually acceptable agreement with Encinitas Union and San Dieguito
Union High School Districts to provide for future school requirements that
will result from the proposed development.
IV. CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE MAP MO. CT 73-20
*•
A. Tentative Map : A total of 28 lots are proposed. Lots 134 & 135 are
indicated to be utilized for a school site and park site respectfully. As the
Commission is aware, the City and representatives of La Costa have been meeting
to resolve the parks allocation for the total La Costa area. As a result of
this study, it may be that Lot 135 will not be needed for a park site. It is
recommended that an option be provided to permit the resolution of this requirement
before recordation of the final map on Unit One of this subdivision.
The applicant indicates that the subdivision will be developed into two
units with 893 d.u. in the first unit (indicated as Unit No. 2) and 113 d.u. in
.the second unit (indicated as Unit No. 3).
B- Staff RecoriTnentation: That ii be moved that the Planning Commission re-
commend to" the City Council that CT 73-20 BE-APPROVED subject to the conditions
outlined below. Justification is based upon:
1. Conformance of the tentative map to the La Costa Master Plan.
2. Conformance of the tentative map to all municipal codes and the
State of California Subdivision Map Act. - '•'.'•
C. Conditions of Approval: Any approval should be subject to the following conditions
1. Prior to the recordation of, the final map on Unit No. 2, either one of
the following shall be accomplished:
(a) The City Council shall have considered and approved the parks
program for the La Costa area and all required parks have been dedicated
to the City to meet the Parks Ordinance requirements for all proposed
development in that area covered by the La Costa Master Plan.
(b) Lot 135 shall be dedicated to the City of Carlsbad for park
purposes i'
2. The open space easement indicated on lots 119, 120, 122, 125 and 126 shall
be dedicated to the City of Carlsbad.
3. The applicant shall install a fully actuated traffic signal at the
-proposed-intersection of Levante Street and El Camino Real, in a manner
acceptable to the City Engineer.
4. El Carnino Real shall be dedicated and improved on the basis of 126 ft.
right-of-way to City standards and specifications.
5. La Costa Avenue shall be improved in a manner acceptable to the City
Engineer.
6. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the total property shall be annexed
to the Leucadia County Water District.
7. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to
the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition
to all the requirements, limitations and restrictions of all municipal
ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which,
hereafter may be in force for the purpose of preserving the residential
characteristics of adjacent properties. '
8. The C. C. & R's for this development shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
9. The developer shall enter into a mutually acceptable agreement with
the Encinitas Union and San Dieguito Union School District to provide
for future school requirements that will result fro"- t!v -,•-•••:•• .,-,
velopment.
10. All public improvements shall be made in conformity to the City
of Carlsbad Engineering Design Criteria and Standard Plans, the Sub-
division Ordinance and other City standards to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer, without cost to the City of Carlsbad, and free of all
liens and encumbrances. Improvement plans for water and sewer system
shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts.
11. All utilities, including provisions for cable TV shall be placed
underground and/or shall be completely concealed from view.
12. Ornamental street lighting shall be provided for as' required by
Municipal Ordinance Code. The developer shall post a bond in the amount
necessary to energize said street lights for an eighteen month period
•after'construction "to permit'the'incorporation of the subdivision into
a maintenance district.
13. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required
for checking and approval, before construction of any improvements is
commenced. The subdivider shall submit the original drawings revised
to reflect as-built conditions, prior to acceptance of the subdivision
improvements by the City.
14. All land/or easements required by this Ordinance shall be granted
to the City of Carlsbad without cost to the City, and free of all liens
and encumbrances.
15. All facilities provided to adequately control drainage on the subject
•property -shall -be- mainta-ined :by -the-property- owner(s) in .perpetuity.
16. The subdivider shall dedicate to the public, all rights of ingress and
eoress from lots abutting upon restricted access streets and roads over and
across the lines of said lots abutting said streets and roads. This
dedication shall be so designated on the certificate sheet of the Final
Map with the intent that the owners of .said lots will have no rights, of
access whatsoever to said streets and roads. The words "access rights
dedicated to the City" shall be lettered along the road adjacent to the lots
affected on the map proper. This requirement shall apply to Lot 108-110
along El Camino Real, and lots adjacent to La C'osta Avenue.
17. Street names shall be subject to approval and shall be designated in
accordance with the standards and policies adopted by the Planning Commission
on file in the Planning Department. Said names shall be approved by the
Planning Director prior to recordation of the Final Map.
18. If required by the City Engineering Office, the improvement plans shall
include a report of a geological investigation and a complete grading plan
of the entire site. The report and plan shall be prepared by Civil Engineers
licensed by the State of California, and experienced in erosion control, who
shall be acceptable to the City Engineer, and they shall certify that they
have investigated the site and prepared data with full consideration of the
consequences to be included and neighboring properties.
-9-
ATTACHED MATERIALS: In addition to area maps, please-find attached the
following:
1. Letter from P. Duvel, Leucadia Co. Water District.
2. Letter from A.M. Reilly - Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
3. Two letters from W. A. Berrier - San Diegin'to Union High School
4. Letter from J. B. Askew-Director of Public Health.
LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
1959 EL CAMINO REAL » LEUCAD-A. CALIFORNIA 92O24 o 753-O155
. May 23, 1973 RECEIVED
. MAY 2 4 1973
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue CITY OF CARLSBAD
Carlsbad, California 92008 Planning Department
Attention: Director of Planning i
Re: CT73-20 Spanish Village # 2
Gentlemen: . . ' •
In response to your request. The following information is
provided regarding proposed sewer service to referenced project.
1. The northern half of CT73-20 is within the boundaries .
of Leucadia County Water District. Sewer service will
be available upon payment of applicable connection
fees, surcharge fees, lateral connection fees, engineering
and inspection fees, and monthly sewer service
charges. .
'-• 2. The southern half of CT-73-20 is not within boundaries
of LCWD. Sewer service will be available upon
annexation to LCWD and payment of annexation fees,
back taxes, legal and filing fees, connection fees,
surcharge fees, engineering and inspection fees, and
monthly sewer service charges«
Should you need more information on this subject, plea.se contact
the Leucadia County Water District office.
Very truly yours,
LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
Paul Duvel
District Supervisor
PDrCab
BOARD Or DIRECTORS
James D. Wood, Pres.
Howard Golem, V. Pr«.
Roger G. Millur, Treasurer
Joseph ]Vcnkf:t, Director
Otto Berk, Director
OSivenkm Municipal Water District
1966 OLIVENHAIN ROAD
ENCINITAS. CALIFORNIA 92024
PHONE 753-6466
May 16, 1973
COUNSEL
Vcrn Peltier
ENGINEER
Boyle • Eng'meerif.j
MANAGER-SECRETARY
Bi7i Hollingsworth .
City of Carlsbad
1200-Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attention:
Subject:
Gentlemen
Donald A. Agatep
Director of Planning
SP-119 and CT 73-20
Spanish Village at La Costa
RECEIVED
MAY 18 1973 ;
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Department
This is in response to your request for comments
relative to the subject proposed development.
• The 'development--is located within the O.livenhain
Municipal Water District. -The District can deliver water
to each unit in the development upon completion of the
necessary financial arrangements.
Yours truly,
A.M1. Reilly,
Executive Assistant
AR: js
'..IV.-NHAIN ROAD AT KANOIO SANTA ff EOAO
1200 EL,M AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92003
TELEPHONE:
(714)729-1181
Ctt^of Carfefcab
. May 29, 1973
Mr. Donald A. Agatep
Director of Planning
. City. of .Carlsbad
1200 Eta Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92003
Dear Mr. Agatep:
iECEIYED
MAY 31 1973
CITY OF. CARLSBAD
Planning Department
Your request for our recommendations concerning Tentative Kap No. CT
73-20 of the subdivision to be known as Spanish Village at La Costa
Unit Ho. 2, has been received and reviewed by this department.
This subdivision would be acceptable to the Department of Public Health
provided:
1. , All domestic water supplied to this subdivision comes from the Olivenhain
- -Municipal -Water District.
2. All "buildings constructed in this subdivision are connected to the
Leucadia County Water District public sewer system.
3. The sewer and vater lines are not laid in the same trench in any
part of this subdivision.
h. Proper drainage is maintained throughout the subdivision so as to
prevent ponding and/or storage of surface vater.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to make recommendations concerning
the proposed subdivision. •
y truly yours,
J. B. ASKEW, M.D.
Director of Public Health
JBA:GQ:sd
cc: Federal Housing Administration
Veterans Administration
Department of Real Estate (Sub. Sec.)
\ 7 "T? ^ T T T T1 -'Pii £,-**zUI li 4J
MiON HIGH SCHOOL BISTHiC
2151 HEWCASTLE, CARDIFF, CAIIFO.WIA 32007 714-753-5431
May 14, 1973
1 6 1973
CARLSBAD
Mr. Donald A. Agatep
Director of Planning
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Dear Mr. Agatep: . •
I have been asked to comment on the following maps - CT 73-25, CT 73-19, _SPjJ
CT 73-20 relative to the impact that the proposed developments may have on the San
Dieguito Union High School District. As has been explained by this office before,
school facilities of the San Dieguito High School District are operating on an
extended day basis with double sessions being a distinct possibility sometime during
the next school year. The district is currently building a second high school,
however, current information would indicate that the present rate of building in
.the district will make even these facilities overcrowded as early as the fall of 1975.
At present there is no high school site in the portion of the San Dieguito Union High
School District that is located within the boundaries of the city limits of Carlsbad.
A study is currently underx^ay to determine the number and location of additional sites
to accommodate the anticipated influx of new students from housing developments
currently under construction or proposed. The absence of sites or written agreements
by which to acquire them in the Carlsbad area compels us to oppose any additional
dwelling units within that area of our district that is within: the city limits of
Carlsbad. - • . .
I would like to have the opportunity to present additional information^ to the city of
Carlsbad should this matter coma before them for their consideration. ..P,!^.^^-1-4"!-0-?
as to he a ring _ d a r n s bv ncii ling cor.iesofn the Planning Coznmission^ and City Council
agendas co this office tor r>eru3al.
n •• .1 I I '' ir inn r in i ji illiiLiriT ru ul UHMtUP* JLmiti
Sincerely,
William A. Berrier
Superintendent
OOAHD O. O. SholcJcri,
'.'Ice f'r«»IU«nt
DouqloJ M. f-'ouquat,
Clork
E. Donald Fr'-
Flobort A. Morion.
•A 11 >0>4 ^ *- .' - _;*". V '.:'•
Yv a $*U4t tf>( > - - —•*•.. • *
V • ' •'liP«iuV\ • 0«J*&w**7*-
\ " ••
SAM DIEGUITO
UniGn HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
2151 NEWCASTLE, CARDIFF, CAUFO.WiA 22007 •
1 6 1973
CARLSBAD
Mr. Donald A. Agatep
-Director -of Planning
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Dear Mr. Agatep: ' - .
I have been asked to comment on the following maps - CT 73-25, CT 73-19, SP-119 -
CT J^S^O^relative to the impact that the proposed developments may have on the San
Dieguito Union High School District. As has been explained by this office before,
school facilities of the San Dieguito High School District are operating on an
extended day basis with double sessions being a distinct possibility sometime during
the next school year. The district is currently building a second high school,
however, current information would indicate that the present rate of building in
the district will make even these facilities overcrowded as early as the fall of 1975.
At present there is no high school site in the portion of the San Dieguito Union High
School District that is located within the boundaries of the city limits of Carlsbad.
A study is currently underway to determine the number and location of additional sites
to .accommodate the anticipated influx of new students from housing developments
currently under construction or proposed. The absence of sites or written agreements
by x^hich to acquire them in the Carlsbad area compels us to oppose any additional
dwelling units within that area -of our district that is within" the city limits of
Carlsbad. . : .
I would like to have the opportunity to present additional information to the city of
Carlsbad should this matter come before them for their consideration.
as to h ea rin g_jlQ!Jls__hv__Tp. a ilia p; conies of the Planning Commission and Citv Council
agendas to this^pjTJ^cg^fpr perusal.
Sincerely,
William A. Berrier
Superintendent
bfi
BOA no "i. :>. Sho'cinrs,
v'lc-i Frcilrtont
Douglos M. Fouqu^t,
Clork
K. Donald
AD,'.'Flobef I A. Morton,