HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-05-21; City Council; 1054-2; Covington Conimark: Zone change•THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, C A L I F' O R N I A
1054 Date: May 21, 1974
Referred To:
subject: Zone Change 101, Specific Plan 102 and submitted By:
CT ""' i- CONINMARK PLANMNG DEPARTMENT
'Statement of the Matter
Agenda Bill No. 1054 was presented to the City Council on April 2, 1974, to
allow the applicant to reassess his position relative to the General Plan
revision.
The City Council did not take action, but continued the matter to May 21, 1974
to allow time for additional information to be presented on the proposed General
Plan densities and proposed circulation. Staff is submitting a report addressing
the relationship of the recently adopted Open Space and Conservation element and
applicable ordinances, to the development as it is proposed.
Exhibit^
1. Staff report to the City Manager
staff Re commend a ti on s to the City Manager:
That the Council grant the P-C (Planned Community) zone change request, providing
the Specific Plan and Tentative Mao are redesigned as outlined in the attached
report.
A-B no.Date.- May 21, 1974
City Manager's Recomm&nri*ion
As indicated in the "Statement of the Matter," the Council
continued this item to allow time for additional information
to be presented on .its relationship to the proposed General
Plan densities. In trying to read the Council's direction
the staff also looked at the development as it relates to
the Open Space Element of the General Plan. Some recommendations
are made in the attached staff report which we feel would bring
it into closer conformity with the intent of that Open Space
Element. Intent, however, is a subjective determination and
it may be that the Council is satisfied with the present
proposal. If so, the proper action would be to approve the
Zone Change and the Specific Plan, referring the matter to
the City Attorney for preparation of the necessary legal documents.
If the Council feels the plan should be amended, as suggested by
the staff, the Council could approve the Zone Change and refer
the Specific Plan back to the Planning Commission for review and
redesign.
Council
'CONTINUE TO .4.-/.C"!
-2-
February 21, 1974
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 15, 1974 FROM WILLIAM ZONGKER,
COVINGTON-CONINMARK.
Mr. Zongkers1 letter requesting reconsideration at the March 6, 1974 City
Council meeting may be appropriate, if the following determinations can beimade:
That the work on the circulation element has been substantially
completed with specific reference to circulation along the north
shore of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The Circulation Committee and
the City Engineering staff recommendation that circulation be
accomplished within a 60 foot right-of-way, and the possibility of
one-way couplets considered as a means of satisfying the circulation
demands generated by multi-family residential units on the north shore
of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
As of this date, these recommendations are at staff level and have
not been presented to the Planning Commission or City Council,
therefore, if you are desirous of placing the item on the Agenda,
staff may be in a position to state that the subject development
may proceed, providing the 60 ft. right-of-way and one-way couplets
are utilized.
The subject application, however, was not continued pending consideration of
the entire General Plan effort, but, only that part of the General Plan that
would apply to the area along the north shore of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
SHiS**"^ P.O.Box99172»SanDiego,Calif.92109»274-2312
\- February., 15,,'.'197^
Paul- Bussey
>^_ ^j^ -f ±- ~,Ox b V
Vp-^p ~-a~»A *G.iiC~^,*—^V>"..
of Carlsbad.
1200 Elm. Avenue
Carlsbad., California S200S
i? •/
Dear Mr. Bussey,
• 1 am a general" partner of -Covington-Coninmark, a partnership
which'applied to•'the City-of Carlsbad for certain actionP o^lA. ^/ ii wu^^/ .,—u^^i. i-* w I^-A ^^ w — vy j* • ^J J- '
^ respect to property- (12,905 ".ere;
ntersection of Adars and Hoover Streets. Specifically, tr^
-ClO i
following applications were made:
W, , '. -j.^, An application "for a change" of zone t~ PTanred
cIx., 6, 197 3 > ^he^ environmental impact report was .'accepted,
^ 1973!"^ motion was [made \""
''adopted to-'continue agenda Bill 105^ and the three
^accompanying resolutions' (pertaining to items 1 ana 2 abovfO
unoil such time as the General Plan Revision on tne subject;
ct.^t$ Jl US
. Based _pn-. diocuasions^affethe^pabiic,".hearing ;.
I understood that the continuance-of the Agenda Bill and
resolutions was predicated upon a traffic circulation and
density study of only the north shore of Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
IviOWj 1 understand that the studies not only exceed the north
shore area, but -also exceed the "subject area" described in
the continuing motion; in fact, the study, as I understand it,
includes the whole City of Carlsbad. While on March 7,. 1973
:!' understood that the study could take up to six months (base'cV
on statements, made at the public hearing), the matter has now-
continued for one/year. Further, it is my understanding that
the study;may continue for a second year (into 1975) before
a final-city-wide-plan is finally approved. ' • • '
P.O.Box99172"San Diego.Calif.92109-274-2312
Without" going into great < 'detail at' this time, suffice i
say ~hat the long delay (and, additional prospective.de!
has had/ 'and vail ha
t to, %a-,y t
,, substantia •3
U i JL J- >D _L
i. _ c; c v v r_
i. O L/ 'O _ CT '_, 1*1, C
, for ios
o near -Gc:
rs : will certain onl
whether .the City Council will agree to reconsider the
matter. At that-time,, if reconsideration is granted,-I
understand that, the agenda bill will be entered on the
calendar,.:for actual hearing" at a'subsequent meeting of
the Council. . ,, , .
\"-,-.oy truly ^".~u'"3
COYINGTON-CO^INMARK
: -- . - \ \-'.\ \ /'-J./ . \ J-J ^-W-^^r.
fi ^i >^ ii "^ ^ ~i O ^ -o -f- v^ -i -^i - \o^ij.c.1. a.J_ j. ci.-i- ^AiCa. \ \x \