HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-11-06; City Council; 3227; Procedure for adjustment plats vs parcel maps*' THCITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFOR
Agenda Bill NO. *j3,£ / Date November 6., 1Q74
Referred To:
Subject: Parcel Maps-addition to Carlsbad Submitted By:
Municipal Code Chapter 20.20 to allow (/
adjustment plats to be filed in lieu of lr-—
parcel maps in certain cases. City Engineer
Statement of the Matter
Chapter 20.20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, regarding parcel splits,
does not presently distinguish between normal parcel splitting and
simple lot consolidations or property boundary adjustments. A Carls^
bad property owner wishes to make a simple boundary adjustment on a
large parcel, and has requested a revision of ordinance to allow a
separate boundary adjustment procedure. City administration concurs
with this request.
This procedure is introduced as a separate section of the Parcel
Split Chapter of the Municipal Code. In it, the procedure is defined,
qualification criteria is enumerated, and cross reference to the
fiarcel split procedure is made.
Exhibit
1. Memorandum from Public Works Administrator
- " i
2. Letter dated July 24, 1974.
Staff Recommendations
That the City Council approve the proposed addition to the Municipal
Code, in concept, and direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary
resolutions for presentation to the City Council at the next regularly
scheduled meeting.
AS No. Date: November 6, 1974
City Manager's Recommendation
This matter has been raised on numerous occasions. Most cities have
some provisions within their Parcel Map Ordinance for minor lot ad-
justments without being responsible for all public improvements and
it is recommended that the City Council instruct the staff to prepare
the necessary changes to our City Code to provide for similar adjust-
ments. It should be pointed out, however, that the staff recommenda-
tions will still provide less flexibility than most cities provide
since most other cities have a strong Public Improvement Ordinance
which requires the installation of public improvements in connection
with the issuance of a building permit. While our proposal is a step
in the right direction and will solve some of the problems we have
encountered, to more completely resolve the problem, a Public Improve-
ment Ordinance will need to be developed.
Council'Action
11-6-74 The Council accepted staff recommendation, and the City Attorney
was instructed to prepare the document necessary to amend
Chapter 20.20 of the Municipal Code to allow adjustment plats
to be filed in lieu of parcel maps in certain cases.
MEMORANDUM
October 28, 197^
TO : City Manager
FROM: Public Works Administrator
SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter 20.20 of the Municipal
Code
In order to handle at staff level those minor property line adjust-
ments and lot line consolidation cases that we would prefer not come
under the conditions of our present parcel map ordinance, we would
propose that the Municipal Code be modified to allow for administra-
tive lot line adjustments.
We would
such as :
suggest that the ordinance modifying the Code contain wording
An adjustment of boundary creating no additional lot or parcel
or a consolidation of two lots where standard public improve-
ments exist, may be made by filing an adjustment plat with the
City Engineer. The plat shall be of a size and form prescribed
by the City Engineer and shall bear the signature of the owners
of the lots or parcels involved. Title reports for the lots or
parcels involved shall be submitted at the time of filing. Upon
receipt of a filing fee, which is the same fee set for parcel
map recordation, the City Engineer will approve the adjustment
plat if it is determined that the exchange of property or lot
consolidation does not:
1. Create additional lots.
2. Include a lot created illegally.
3. Impair any existing access or create a need for a new access
to any adjacent lot.
4. Impair any existing easement or create a need for a new easement.
5. Violate zoning requirements.
6. Alter the city limit boundary.
7. Require substantial alterations of existing public improvements
or create a need for new public improvements.
The plat may be conditionally approved subject to further monumen-
tation as required to retrace the adjusted property boundary. Other-
wise, the plat will be disapproved, and the boundary adjustment or
lot consolidation shall be accomplished by filing a tentative and
final parcel map in the manner set forth in this chapter.
Additional wording as may be required to outline
procedures, forms to be used, etc. can be worked
Attorney and staff.
the application
out between the City
Ronald A. Beckman
RAB/de
^ £
QVESTORS w
DEVELOPMENT &
MORTGAGE CORPQR/VT1Q
7T
VC.fr P
July 24> 1974
The Honorable Robert C. Frazee
Mayor of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Dear Mayor Frazee:
Enclosed is a plat showing the Palomar Vista,Ltd. ownership
(shaded in blue) and mine (shaded in red). It is our mutual
desire to adjust the contiguous portion of our boundary to
consolidate the one and one half acre parcel, indicated by
red cross hatching, with my ownership.
This transaction would not be a division of land as defined
by the State Map Act since no additional parcels would be
created.
In 1972 the City of Carlsbad revised Title 20 of its code.
Title 20 establishes requirements, procedures and standards
for subdivisions and parcel maps. Prior to the revision of
Title 20, a boundary between contiguous properties could be
accomplished by the filing of a Boundary Adjustment Plat;
however, no provision has been made to allow for this type
of transaction in your new ordinance. As a result, your city
staff has interpreted that this exchange of property can be
accomplished only by the recording of a parcel map.
The Palomar Vista, Ltd. parcel contains approximately 200
acres and my property consists of 26 acres. It is not my
intention to create another parcel, but only to include that
portion of Palomar Vista property that lies in the same topo-
graphic plane as my property with my ownership. I feel that
the City of Carlsbad should have a procedure to allow such
a transaction without the financial hardship of conforming to
the parcel map requirements.
I am sure my problem is not unique, and I request that an adden-
dum or r.ew ordinance be adopted that would provide for boundary
adjustments.
Sincerely,
// j/J f f ^A .^ 5,e,c\ *'£-'&•' f f^f- *"" *'-*-->**'sw..
Russell W. Grosse
RWG/db Enclosures5B5O AVENIDA ENCINAS • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA aaooa • PHONE • 714 • 72a-92B<*
CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE *SS*UlOa • ARIZONA • NEVADA CONTRACTORS LICENSE a1199S