HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-11-19; City Council; 2207-1; TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSION |INDUSTRIAL PARK LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF PALOMAR AIPORT ROAD AND EL CAMINO REAL| CABOT, CABOT AND FORBES CT 73-49,/
DateNovember 19, 1! y! IA
CITY OF CARLSPAD, CALIF zc p
*’ r)
0 s e8 Agenda Bi 11 “0. ~b& 6 / .+
Referred To:
Subject: Tentative map time extension Subrni tted By:
(Industrial Park located in the south/
east quadrant of the intersection of
Palomar Airport Road and El Camino
Real) Cabot, Cabot & Forbes CT 73-49
Statement of the Matter
On November 20, 1973, the City Council by Resolution No. 3272,
approved the tentative map of Carlsbad Tract 73-49,
has requested that the subject tentative map be extended.
The applicant
Exhibit
- A. - Letter requesting extension.
Staff Recommendations
Adopt a motion approving the applicant’s request that the tenta-
tive map of Carlsbad Tract 73-49 be extended to November 20, 1975
5 0 e
AS NO. ~~t~~ November 19, 1974
CY t 9 Mana qer ' s Recomm~r: da ti on
Concur with staff recommendation. It should be noted that the
schedule outlined in Cabot, Cabot & Forbes letter anticipates a
final map filing date of February 1977. Since tentative maps by
State law are only good for two years, the staff recommendation is
to extend to November 20, 1975. The applicant will be informed of
this matter.
Council Action
11-19-74 The tentative map for Carlsbad Tract 73-49 was extended to November 20, 1975.
-2-
0' -4. Ad&; a -.--
I,.-" B e'
CHE36T,CAB31 ik FORBES */*
I 0 \YC5T 4 STOiET SUITE 100 SAV 31FGO CALIFOPN14
//i ?33 os31
October 9, 1974
Mr. Tim Flanagan
City Engineer City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California
Re: CC&F Palomar Airport Business Park E@neerir.,g &?par&Tletnt
Dear Tim:
If you recall, at a meeting in ysar office three weeks ago, we discussed the necessity of requesting an extension on
the timing of our Tentative Map Resolution. As I under-
stand it at this moment, the Tentative Map Resolution
R3272 is in effect until1 November 20, 1974. Due to the
timing problems with the additional piece of annexation
and the finalization of improvement plans, it would seem
that we are going to be cutting it very close in the matter of "Recording" our Final Map for Unit #l. I am hereby respectfully requesting an extension to our origi-
nal Tentative Map Resolution with an additional condition
from the Coxncil to cover our phase development program,
As you are aware, the original- Resolution and Tentative
Map had addressed itself to three Units of development.
I would like to have an additional condition if possible
which might allow for the'proposed Final Map "filing" in
the following manner:
Unit No. Proposed Final Map Filinq Date
Unit 41 January, 1975
Unit #2 February, 19 76
Unit 43 February, 19 7 7
Naturally the above outlined proposed filing dates are our
best projection at this moment of time and the only reason
..--, P i' - \),I I ', : -?
@{T;'y c; <- a"! --- ''* L?"l!iLbliif\.Q
Request for Tentative Map Resolution Extension
daJtr>v OF-ICE Lr STATE bTRCCT rj33-3h LIAZSAChd5
4 >rL7- 1 S,-CALa 343-'u < -35 .&\\-.GE-Es s.i\ c'A\CI>C3 SaN c EGO
oi' @I
ABOT, CABOT & FORBES ,"
Mr. Tim Flanagan
October 9, 1974
Page 2
that I have indicated an extension until January, 1975
on Unit #1 is simply to allow both ourselves and your
Engineering Department a little "cushion" in the event we run into any delays on agreements, bonds, etc.
I would also like to discuss with you the ramificatiops of timing for completion of each Subdivision Unit's
Improvements. Please contact me on this matter at your
earliest convenience and I hope that we might proceed
with this extension within the next couple of Council meetings.
Sincerely y
-/ 9, 2- /'
I
,, - n c 0- ---- , -1 \-
I. r'
Paul Hammons
Project Engineer
PH: lh
cc: Hank Worley
Chuck Ekstrom