Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-05-20; City Council; 3373; California Coastal Zone Plan ReviewCITY OF CARLSBAD AGENDA BILL No._.3.='$&.:..,1. .... 1:-.---------- DATE: May 20, 1~75 . _________ _ DEPART~NT: City Manager Subject: CALIFORNIA COASTAL ZONE PLAN REVIEW Statement of the Matter Initial: Dept.Hd. __ C. Atty. •..!.Mgr.+ At an earlier meeting the City Council had a work/study session on the California Coastal Zone Plan. At that time representatives of the San Diego Regional Coast Commission reviewed the plan with the City Council and the Planning Commission. Since that time, one public hearing on the plan has been held in San Diego, with a second public hearing scheduled for May 23,-1975. Exhibit Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council give consideration to taking a position on the Coast Plan as presently proposed. Council Action 5-20-75 It was moved that the Council's position be that the land po~icy be carried out by the local governments; the State Coastal Agency would a) keep the plan up-dated, b) hear appeals from local decisions and c) protdct state-wide coastal in- terests. The staff was instructed to prepare a letter stat-. ing the Council's pDsition. · TO: FROM: CITY MANAGER PLANNING DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM May 20, 1975 SUBJECT: PROVISIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY CALIFORNIA COASTAL PLAN AS THEY AFFECT CITY OF CARLSBAD The Planning Department has reviewed the findings, policies and recommend 9tions of the preliminary coastal plan as they may affect the City of Carlsbad. Without going into a lengthy analysis of each finding.and policy and its impact on the City planning process, I would offer the major issues identified within the Coastal Commission document: l) The Plan identifies Carlsbad as a priority area for the application of subre,,ional Coasta 1 Cammi ssi on planning. A 1 though there is no specific committment proposad in the Plan, it is apparently the intent f.o use Carlsbad as one of the three prime subregions in the State as an ex amp 1 e for future Coasta 1 zone planning. Resources which '~he Coastal Commission staff believes are significant and for which the subregional plan is proposed are agricultural lands, lagoo·1 resources and the redevelopment of the downtown 2) The following major issues directly affect the City of Carlsbad: a) Designation of a potential coastal zone boundary which extends five miles inland from coastal mean high tide. bj Recognition of a substantial amount of prime and potentially prime agricultural land in the undeveloped portion of Carlsbad southerly of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. c) Provisions for public access including pedestrian, bicycle and automobile, to beaches and lagoons within the City. d) Recreational use of the lagoon and coastal resources so as to concurrently provide for trails, marinas and public parking facilities. e) Recognition of the downtown as a regionally significant project in that, pressures in the undeveloped portions of Carlsbad may be relieved by development in the existing developed areas of the City. f) A strong recommendation for provision of design review 1~hich would includu regulation of cor.stal views, coastal open space structures and signs. .,., ., 3) -2- It also seems the plan incorporates a variety of methods whereby the control of the coastal resources zone would be given to varying com- binations of state or local government. The recommendation to date is for the extension of the existing State Coastal Conservation Commission or a similar successor agency. It would seem that local control of items a through f would be relinqu'ished if the State became involved in design review, land use, especially with respect to agricultural lands and the downtown. There have been two hearings in San Diego on the plan, a third meeting is scheduled for May 23 during which Coastal Commission will be requesting input from all affected agencies. I believe the above information can assist in developing an opinion that would be submitted to the Commission by the City Council. I quote from the document the primary issues that affect the City of Carlsbad. 11 Protection of lagoon and surrounding areas, protection of flori- cultural and agricultural lands, and maximum public access to beaches are of prime concerns of the Carlsbad subregion." I believe that the preceding statement warrants a strong position by the City Council. It is my belief that planning currently developing in the City through the General Plan process meets to a large degree the policies and recommendations of the plan and I see no need to grant additional review authority unnecessarily to the State. Any questions you may have regarding this matter, please contact this office at your convenience. DAA/br