HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-02-17; City Council; 3500-1; Phase III Upgradng and Enlargement of EWPCF• o ,^":;v w T^O- •/•CITY OF CARLSBAD ' /'„, /
AGENDA BILL NO. 3500 Supplement No. / Initial:
Dept.Hd.
DATE: February 17, 1976 r
DEPARTMENT; Public Works C. Mgr.
Subject:
PHASE III UPGRADING AND ENLARGEMENT OF THE ENCINA WATER POLLUTION
CONTROL FACILITY
Statement of the Matter
At the December 31, 1975 meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee, it
was advised by the General Counsel that each of the members of the
Encina Joint Sewerage System were obliged by the 7th Supplement to
approve the project report, EIR and financial plan & revenue program
prepared by Brown and Caldwell in-order to proceed with the rest of
the design services. By motion of the JAC, each member agency was
requested to adopt a resolution substantially in the form of Exhibit A.
Exhibits
A. staff report
B. County report
C. Resolution No.Jf|^V, approving the project report, environmental
impact report and financial plan & revenue program for Phase III
Recommendation
It is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution No .^J&*/, approving
the project report, EIR and financial plan & revenue program.
Council action
2-17-76 Resolution #3834 was adopted, approving the project report, EIR.
financial plan and revenue program.
MEMORANDUM
February 9, 1976
TO: City Manager
FROM: Public Works Administrator
SUBJECT: Encina Water Pollution Control Facility, Phase III
project approval
Attached is a report received from the County Department of Sanitation
'and Flood Control summarizing and updating information contained in the
Phase III Project Report and Financial Report. The County has requested
that the City Council, along with the boards of directors for the other
agencies of the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility, approve a reso-
lution of approval for the Project Report, Environmental Impact Report,
.and Financial Plan and Revenue Program. This approval is required in
order to proceed with the design and preparation of plans and specifi-
cations of the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility Phase III expan-
sion and upgrading program.
Briefly summarizing the history of this project, State and Federal laws
required that we bring the quality of our treated effluent into confor-
mance with Federal and State discharge quality standards. Preliminary
engineering studies indicated that the most efficient way of meeting
State and Federal discharge standards would be to convert the existing
primary treatment plant to a secondary treatment plant, utilizing bio-
filters. In addition, it was suggested that the capacity of the secondary
portion of the project be enlarged to 18 million gallons per day (mgd)
in order to take advantage of the capability of our present primary
facilities to handle increased flows when followed by secondary treatment.
This project is not without opposition. The first objection surfaced
when experts in the field of sanitary engineering challenged the require-
ment for effluent discharge into the Pacific Ocean basins to meet the
quality standards, set forth in federal laws, established primarily on
the basis of the quality needs for discharge of effluent into the Atlantic
Ocean and inland bodies of water. Some efforts are still being made to
change those standards as they apply to discharges into the Pacific
Ocean. Another basis of objection to this project lies in what is
claimed to be the grox^th-accommodating characteristics of increased
capacity. This growth-accommodating characteristic is portrayed as
presenting a danger to the preservation of prime agricultural areas
within- our service basin, as well as contributing to the deterioration
of air quality. This logic has been the primary basis of objections to
the issuance of a Regional Coastal Commission permit for the construction
of this facility. This logic was also included in the appeals submitted
by the Sierra Club and by Carlsbad Community Cause to the issuance of
the Regional Coastal Commission permit.
W
City Manager
February 9, 1976
Page Two
In response to the objections outlined above/ the following facts are
presented for consideration:
1. Unless State and Federal laws are changed, we have no choice but to
comply with discharge standards. In this respect, secondary treat-
ment is mandated.
2. With regards to the preservation of agricultural land, the General
Plan of the City of Carlsbad states that it is the express policy of
the City of Carlsbad to "regard agricultural land and prime soil as
a natural resource and as a significant contrasting land use to the
urbanized environment of the city." To this end, it is the intent
of the Open Space and Conservation Element to "insure recognition of
the benefits which accrue from the conservation, development and
utilization of natural resources."
3. The City has entered into an agreement with the Regional Coastal
Commission's staff to jointly prepare a developmental program for
the area surrounding the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. An express purpose
of this project is to establish parity between the City General Plan
and the California Coastal Plan as it may be passed by the legislature,
4. The City is actively involved with the other general purpose govern-
ments in the Encina Public Facilities Planning Group. The goals of
this group are to establish a public facilities and land use staging
program for the entire Encina service area.
5. Conditions placed on existing Coastal Commission permits and on the
Regional permit for the construction of Phase III protect all agricul-
tural land lying within the Coastal Resources Management Zone and
within the City limits. Restrictions placed on the issuance of the
construction grant preclude the use of any additional capacity we may
'gain as a result of this project until June 30, 1980, or until the
acceptance of an Air Quality Maintenance Program, whichever comes
first.
6. The concept of the project has been approved by the State Water
Resources Control Board and has received preliminary approval from
the Environmental Protection Agency. Stage 1 and 2 grants have been
made.
7. The project was approved unconditionally by CPO in its A-95 review
process and has been cleared by all other State agencies through the
State clearinghouse process. The Regional Coastal Commission unanim-
ously approved a construction permit.
8. The project is cost-effective. The unit price of converting our
existing 13.75 mgd primary plant to a secondary plant of equivalent
size is $1.78.6* per gallon. Taking advantage of the economies of
construction and the unique ability of our plant to be expanded
economically, the additional capacity which would accrue to the
facility and to the City of Carlsbad (1.13 mgd) would be available
at a cost of 89£ per gallon. Should we not take advantage of the
opportunity, the other agencies within the Encina Water Pollution
Control Facility would certainly be able to benefit by paying for
and receiving the additional "cheap capacity" at this time. In 1985,
c
City Manager
February 9, 1976
Page Three
when our existing capacity will be reached, the cost of providing
both primary and secondary treatment to gain additional capacity
would be prohibitive.
The Regional Comprehensive Plan, Series 2A forecasts for the City of
Carlsbad, which were published by the Comprehensive Planning Organization
in December of 1975, indicate that our population projections for 1980
are 28,600; for 1985, 34,300; and for 1990, 42,000. Using the rule of
thumb of 100 gallons per day per capita requirements, the CPO population
projection figures show that our present capacity limits will be reached
in 1985. Based upon experience gained by the Phase III project, we
would no sooner complete the construction of Phase III when we would
be required to start planning and implementation for construction of
Phase IV. This is not only a shameful waste of the time resources of
City personnel, but contrary to the policies of the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, which provides for a ten-year design period. An additional
side benefit gained by adding the additional capacity at this time would
be that the operations and maintenance of the facility in that time in-
terval between the completion of Phase III and the time the additional
capacity would be needed, could be performed on a more routine basis
with the resultant lowering of operations and maintenance costs and
increased reliability of plant, thereby preventing malfunctions which
may result in discharge violations.
The method of financing this project suggested by the Phase III Financial
Plan was the issuance of General Obligation bonds. This financing method
was also referred to in the County letter. This issue has not been dis-
cussed to date for two reasons; the first being the need for more precise
'information on the project costs. (This wait was justified when you
compare Carlsbad's share of the cost in the Financial Plan, estimated
at $2,786,000, with the current estimate of Carlsbad's share, $1,771,0000
The second reason for the delay is the pending Sewer Master Plan and
Financing Program which will address not only the need of financing the
plant upgrading and expansion but also any questions which may arise
concerning needed trunk line construction costs.
The one question that can be definitely answered now is that there are
sufficient funds available to meet our obligations for the payment of
the design fees on the Phase III project, as well as the other sewer
construction obligations the City has undertaken.
The question facing the City Council at this time is the policy decision
as to whether we should join with the other five owners and acquire
additional capacity in conjunction with the Phase III upgrading, or
should we seek only to provide secondary treatment for our existing
13.75 mgd capacity? Should the latter course be taken, the remaining
five agencies, I am sure, would continue with the project as proposed
(18 mgd) acquiring what would have been Carlsbad's share of the increased
capacity.
City Manager
February 9, 1976
Page Four
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Joint Advisory Committee and City
staff that City Council approve the attached resolution approving
the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility Phase III Project Report,
Environmental Impact Report and Financial Plan and Revenue Program.
lonald A. Beckman
.RAB/dh
attach.
>£•COUNTY OrSAN DIEGO
C. J. HOUSON
Director
COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY
Department of Sanitation & Flood Control (MM)
County Operations Center, 5555 Overland Avenue, San Diego, California 92123 Telephone: 565-5325
2 9 JAN 1978
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attention: Mr. Ronald Beckman •* Public Works Administrator
Gentlemen:
Subject:Project YR0064, Phase III Upgrading and Enlargement
of the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility
(Supervisorial District V)
Enclosed is a copy of a proposed resolution approving the Project Report,
Environmental Impact Report, and Financial Plan and Revenue Program for
the Phase III Upgrading and Enlargement of the Encina Water Pollution
Control Facility (WPCF)-.
On 31 December 1975 the Joint Advisory Committee (JAC) for the Encina
Joint Powers Regional Sewerage Agency met and agreed to recommend
approval of the resolution to their respective Board or Council. The
JAC consists of two members of each of the six owner agencies: Vista
Sanitation District, City of Carlsbad, Buena Sanitation District,
San Marcos County Water District, Leucadia County Water District, and
the Ericinitas Sanitary District. The JAC representatives for Carlsbad
are Mr. Lew Chase and Mr. David Dunne. The County Department of
Sanitation and Flood Control provides project management and facility
operation and maintenance on a contractual basis, under policy direction
of the JAC, for the Encina Agency. It is my
RECOMMENDATION; That your Council
Authorize the execution of a resolution approving the Project Report,
Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and Financial Plan and Revenue
Program for the Phase III Upgrading and Enlargement of the Encina WPCF.
Discussion:
On 18 June 1974 your Council, approved the Seventh Supplement to the Basic.
Agreement which provided for the joint upgrading and enlargement of the
Encina WPCF to comply with state and federal water quality requirements,
Exhibit B 1 of. "•
/*•*•-w
City of Carlsbad
Page 2
appointed the Vista Sanitation District as project administrator, authorized
Vista to apply for state and federal grants, and to contract with Brown
and Caldwell, Consulting Engineers, for certain engineering services.
The agreement allowed Brown and Caldwell to prepare a" Project Report, an
EIR, a Financial Plan and Revenue Program, and do related preliminary
engineering. This work has been accomplished and the results submitted
to each owner agency, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB),
and the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for review. Sections
3 and 4 of the agreement require approval of this work by each agency before
Vista can authorize Brown and Caldwell to proceed with the design services,
office engineering during construction, preparation of operation and mainte-
nance manual, and miscellaneous engineering services; all as described in
the Seventh Supplement.
A grant application for federal and state assistance has been submitted to
the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for a Step 1 (Facilities
Plan) and Step 2 (Final Design Plans and Specifications) Grant. Telephone
contact with the GV^CD grant evaluator revealed the grant v;culd be approved
in the very near future in general accordance with Enclosures K2 and fr.5.
The SWRCB project evaluator has also informed us that the Facilities Plan
has been reviewed, found satisfactory, and that a determination has been
made relative to the eligibility of the project. We are anticipating that
86.2 percent of the total project is eligible for a 75 percent federal and
a 12.5 percent state grant. The concept approval and project certification
letters have been prepared by the state and sent to H-'A for concurrence.
The principal item that the EPA is concerned about is the obtainnient of
copies of resolutions from each of the general purpose governments in the
Encina Service Area stating they will cooperate in the development of a
public facilities and land use staging program. All of these resolutions
will be forwarded to EPA in a few weeks. We expect to receive a formal
grant offer from EPA in February after completion of their review. The
SWRCB grant offer will follow shortly thereafter.
You will recall the project consists of upgrading and enlarging the
13.75 million gallons per day (mgd) capacity primary treatment facilities
to primary and secondary facilities with a capacity of 18 mgd. The
existing federal and state treatment regulations require the upgrading
of the facility by January, 19.77. The project time schedule is lagging
due to environmental review considerations, project eligibility discussions
'with the SWRCB and EPA, obtainment of permits, and other review. Enclosure
#1 presents a tentative timetable for proceeding with the project.
Exhibit B 2 of 5
o o
City of Carlsbad
Page 3 OPY
It has been necessary to renegotiate and modify the design and construction
phase of the existing engineering contract between the Vista Sanitation
District and the consulting engineers. This was required because of new
regulations imposed by EPA and an increase in the scope (capital cost) of
the project. The JAC approved a new-fee structure for the work on 31
December 1975. The contract is presently being revised and will be
reviewed by each agency prior to Vista executing a new or modified engineer-
ing-services agreement.
We are pleased to report the Comprehensive Planning Organization (CPO) has
reviewed and unconditionally approved the project. On 9 January 1976 the
San Diego Coast Regional Commission unanimously approved an application
to permit the construction of this project within the coastal zone.
Your approval of the resolution will allow Vista to authorize the consulting
engineer to start the design phase of the work as soon as the Step 1 and
Step 2 grant offers are received and accepted. No further work by the
consulting engineer will be permitted until state and federal approval for
the grants is received.
The Seventh Supplement also requires the review of the present ownership
rights in the Enc'ina WPCF after completion and review of the Facilities
Plan. The Financial Plan and Revenue Program portion of the Facilities
Plan proposes some changes be made because the Encinitas Sanitary District
did not desire to participate in the enlargement part of the project.
Therefore capacity and ownership rights will change as follows:
Present Cap./Ownership
Phase II A
Proposed Cap./Ownership
Phase III
Agency
V
C
B
SM
L
E
%
29.45
24.95
4.51
17.45
16.36
7.27
Flow (MGD)
4.05
3.43
0.62
2.40
2'.25
1.00
0,'0
30.00
25.33
4.56
17.87
16.67
5.55
Flow (MGD)
.5.40
4.56
0.82
3.22
3.00
1.00
100 13.75 100 18.00
Note: Refer to Table 2-1, Page 10, of the Financial Plan and
Revenue Program Report dated Feb. 75. .
Exhibit B 3 01" 3
w
City of Carlsbad
Page 4
It is recommended that in the future an agreement be prepared to reflect
the new ownership arid thus the cost sharing for the project. After
receipt and acceptance of the Step 1 and 2 grant offers it would be
appropriate to proceed with a supplementary agreement covering capacity
rights and ownership. Each of the agencies has reviewed the capacity
rights and ownership situation as presented in the Financial Plan and
Revenue Program and are in mutual agreement as to the proposed changes.
The cost sharing method for the project is recommended to be as shown on
Table 3-2 (Page 14) and Table 3-3 (Page 15) of the Financial Plan and
Revenue Program Report. The Tables are revised to reflect decreased
project costs and an increase in grant eligible flow. Enclosure #4 presents
the current estimate of local project costs and compares to Table 3-2.
Enclosure #5 shows the present estimate for allocation of local costs and
is similar to Table 3-3. It should be noted that Encinitas pays its share
to upgrade the plant to 13.75 mgd. The remaining five participating
agencies pay all costs for enlarging the facility from 13.75 to 18.00.
Funds for the Step 2 work (project design) will come from grants and each of
the six owner agencies. Enclosure #6 provides an estimate of how the
financing will be shared, Carlsbad's ownership of the Encina WFCF will
increase from 24.95 to 25.33 percent. An estimated net cash outlay of about
twenty-eight thousand dollars ($23,000) will fund the City's share of step
2. The City presently has sufficient capital reserve monies to rv.eet this
demand. Upon completion of the project, Carlsbad's capacity rights will
increase from 3.43 mgd to 4.56 mgd. Present flow measurements indicate a
rate of about 2.2 mgd coming from all sewer connections within the City.
Enclosure #7 presents an estimate, for preliminary guidance, as to the cost
of the final phase of the proposed project which is the construction of the
improvements. This portion of the work (Step 3) requires the major share
of monies for the project. Some of the agencies will be required to pass
bond issues to provide their share of funds while others have capital
improvement funds of sufficient magnitude. It is also possible a combination
of bonds and" capital savings may be used. Each agency is responsible to
plan for their own share of funds so as not to delay progress.
Enclosure #5 shows the estimated total share of project costs for the City
is about $1.8 million. Your city will have approximately $185,000 available
upon completion of Phase II and IIA construction. Therefore there are ade-
quate monies to finish the Step 2 or design part of the project. It is our
understanding the electorate of Carlsbad will be voting in June on the issuance
of revenue or general obligation bonds to provide the remaining funds.
Exhibit B 4 of 5
o
City of Carlsbad
Page 5
We believe the resolution should be approved. Work on this mandated
project has been under way for approximately two and one-half years.
All reviews and approvals have either been obtained or are forthcoming.
The project is already behind schedule due to its complexity, grant
reviews and other agency approvals. It is now appropriate to approve
the project which allows Vista to authorize preparation of final plans
and specifications. Further opportunity for project review after
completion of the design work will be provided prior to advertising for
construction bids.
All parties are concurrently processing the approval of the resolution
to expedite action by the six agencies. If your Council finds the
resolution acceptable, a copy should be sent by your Clerk to the Vista
Sanitation District.
C. J. HOUSON
CBO:jc
Enclosures:(1) Proposed Timetable for Phase III Upgrading fT Enlargement
of Encina WPCF
(2) Phase III Upgrading & Enlargement of Encina WPCF - Step 1
(3) Phase III " " " Step 2
(4) Derivation of Local Share of Costs for Phase III
(5) Allocation of Local Share of Costs (Thousands of Dollars)
(6) Proposed Method of Financing
(7) Estimate of Construction Phase Step 3 Grant
(8) Resolution approving the Project Report, EIR, and Financial
Plan and Revenue Program
cc - w/enc) - Controller Branch Office: Attn: Mr. Jack Morien
Exhibit B 5 of 5
ENCLOSURE #1w —=—:—
PROPOSED TIMETABLE
•FOR
PHASE III UPGRADING f, ENLARGEMENT
OF
ENCINA WPCF
Action
1. Obtain JAC approval of Project Report, EIR, and
Financial Plan and Revenue Program. 31 Dec 1975
2. Obtain JAC approval of negotiations with Brown
and Caldwell for design, construction, 0§M
manual, and special services. 31 Dec 1975
3. Obtain State Coastal Zone Permit. 19 Jan 1976
4. Obtain approval from each agency of Project Jan 1976 to
Report, EIR, and Financial Plan and Revenue Early Feb
Program. 1976
5. Agency review of revised design contract with
Engineer. Jan 1976
6. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) gives
concept approval of project; defines portion that
is eligible; authorizes preparation of final plans
and specifications (verbal approval nlrea^y reached). Feb 1976
7. SWRCB approves grant application and certifies Step
1 (Facilities Plan) and Step 2 (Final Plans and
Specifications) grants. (Verbal approval already Feb 1976 --
reached.) EPA and SWRCB grant offers completed. Mar 1976
8. Vista Sanitation District executes revised contract
with design engineer and authorizes proceedings
with final design. Mar 1976
9. Local funding needs accomplished by each agency for June 1976 --•
project through bond elections and other income. Nov 1976
10. Plans and Specifications completed and sent to SWRCB
for review. Sept ]976
11. SWRCB approves Plans and Specifications; makes grant Nov 1976 or
offer; and authorizes advertising for bids. Dec 1976
12. Advertise and open construction bids. Dec 1976 -- Feb 197',
13. Award contract and start construction. May 1977
14. Complete construction, 2-1/2 years. Nov 1979
DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
January 1976
ENCLOSURH #2
W
PHASE III UPGRADING $ ENLARGEMENT
OF
ENCINA WPCF
Step 1 Grant-Facilities Plan
(Verbally approved by State)
Facilities Plan by Brown and Caldwell $55,000
Administrative, professional and technical
services by County (Project management
and coordination with engineer, State,
EPA, applications and permits, archaeology
overview, etc.) $19,000
DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL
COUNTY OP SAN DIEGO
January 1976
Total: $74,000
Less 87-1/2% State and Federal Grant $65,000 (1)
Net Local Funds Required (2) $ 9,000
(1) Payment anticipated to be made soon after
February 1976 since this portion of the
project has been completed and approved
by grant agencies.
(2) Local agencies have already -funded all of
Step 1 work. When grant payments are.made
approximately $65,000 will be available
for Step 2 local costs.
ENCLOSURE #3
PHASE III UPGRADING {J ENLARGEMPjNT
OF
ENCINA WPCF
Step 2 - Grant-Design Plans and Specifications
(Verbally approved by State)
Consulting Engineer's Basic Design Fee $700,000
Preparation of Draft 0 § M Manual Fee . 40,000
Professional, Technical, Project
Management and Miscellaneous Services
Including Contingency.
A. Borings, Surveys, Special'Tests, Other $ 7IJ.OOO
B. County Project Management and Other $__GO,()()()
Estimate
Total: $875,000
Less 87-1/2 % State and Federal Grant $7Jj_6,000
Net Local Funds Required $10(J,000
DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
.January 1976
^ ENCLOSURE
yj —
PHASE III UPGRADING $ ENLARGEMENT
OF
ENCINA WPCF
DERIVATION OF LOCAL SHARE OF COSTS FOR PHASE III
(Thousands of Dollars)
Description 13.75 mgd 18 mgd Total
Total Project Cost $24,560 28,340
Eligible Cost 24,560 24,560
Ineligible Cost -0- 3,780 3,780
Local Share of Eligible Cost
(12.5 percent) 3,070 3,070' 3,070
Total Local Share of Cost 3,070 6,850
Incremental Cost 3,070 3,780 $6,850
DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
January 1976
ENCLOSURE #5
PHASE III UPGRADING g.ENLARGEMENT
OF. .
EKCINA WPCF
ALLOCATION OF'LOCAL SHARE OF COSTS (THOUSANDS
OF DOLLARS)
'
Description
: Local share of eligible cost
| Proportion based on Phase IIA
! capacity rights
j Total local share of eligible
cost (13.75 mgd)
i Local share of ineligible cost
Proportion, based on Phase III
minus Phase IIA capacity
' rights
Total local share of ineligible
' cost (4.25 mgd)
Total local share of project cost
|
Allocation to Participants \
Total ;
Cost Vista | Carlsbad Bucna
i
100% i 29.4%
(
$3,070j 904
i
100% 31.8%
3,780 j 1,202-
6,850 . 2,106
24.9% 4.5%
766 139
.
ii
i
I
26.6% 4.7%
1,005 178
i
1,771 ; . 317
San Marcos i Leucadia i Encinitas j
17.5%
536
'
19.3%
730
1,266
16.4%
502
17.6%
665
1,167
!ii
7.3% j
283 •
-0- i
• -°- ' i
$223
;
o
DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
January 1976
ENCLOSURE
PHASE III UPGRADING § ENLARGEMENT
OF
ENCINA WPCF
AGENCY
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING
Step 2 ($875,000)
FUNDS ESTABLISHED
TOTAL (1) NET LOCAL LOCAL FUNDS TO BE AVAILABLE
OWNERSHIP SHARE SHARE WITH NEEDED TO • UPON COMPLETION
PERCENTAGE W/0 GRANT GRANT. (1) 50% POINT (1) OF PHASE II § IIA
Vista
Carlsbad
Buena
San Marcos •
Leucadia
Encinitas
30.
25.
4.
17.
16.
5.
00
33
56
87
67
55
$262,
$222,
$ 40,
$156,
$146,
$ 49,
000
000
000
000
000
000
$ 33
$ 28
$ 5
$ 19
$ 18
$ 6
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
$129
$109
$ 20
$ 77
$ 72
$ 32
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
$244
$186
$ 95
$750
$500
$700
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
(4)
(4)
(4)
100 $875,000 $109,000 (3) $439,000 (2)
(1) Rounded out to the nearest $1,000.
(2) State will make 50% and 90% grant payments as the design phase of the
project proceeds.
(3) 12-1/2% of total cost.
(4) Approximate amount available in District Special Capital Improvement
Funds for share in Encina Project.
CONCLUSION: Each agency has sufficient funds for share in the Step 2 Phase
of the project including lead monies necessary to meet on-going
expenses prior to receiving State and Federal 50% completion
grant payments.
DEPARTMENT OF. SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
January 1976
O W ENCLOSURE '»7
PHASE III UPGRADING $ ENLARGEMENT
OF
ENCINA WPCF
ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION PHASE
STEP 3 GRANT
Construction Cost, Including Contingency $17,100,000
Office Engineering by Consultant 140,000
Completion of 0$M Manual by Consultant 25,000
Special Services during Construction 50,000
Resident Engineering for 2-1/2 years -- 3 years;
Equipment; and Incidental Expenses • 500,000
$17,815,000 (1)
For .Financial Planning Round Off to $18,000,000
Portion Eligible for Grants -- Rounded Out
(Project is considered 86.2% grant
eligible by State.) '$15,500,000
Total Grant Anticipated 87.5% x 15.5 million $13,580,000
Total Estimated Local Cost:
Ineligible Portion (18 -- 15.5 million) $ 2,500,000
12.5% of Eligible Portion (12,5% x 15.5
million) 1,940,000
$ 4,440,000 (1)
Adjust Funds Needed to Reflect Actual Expenses at Mid-piont of Construction
(September 1978),
Estimated ENR Index =3,500
4.44 million x 3,500 = $6.75 million
2,300
Total Estimated Local Funds Needed: $6.75 million
(1) All costs based on Engineering News Record Index of 2300. The December
1975 ENR Index was 2585.
DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
January 1976
1
2
3
4
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITIES
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
c
RESOLUTION NO. 3834
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PROJECT
REPORT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND FINAN-
CIAL REPORT AND REVENUE PROGRAM FOR THE PHASE
III ENLARGEMENT AND UPGRADING OF THE ENCINA
WHEREAS, as a member of the Encina Joint Sewerage System, the
City of Carlsbad previously entered into the Seventh Supplement to
Basic Agreement to provide for (1) Phase III enlargement and up-
grading of the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility, (2) ownershi
rights, (3) distribution of buy-in monies, and (4) participation in
the Joint Advisory Committee, (hereinafter the "Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the Agreement provided for certain engineering
services to be provided by Brown and Caldwell, Consulting Engineers,
such services have been performed, and there has been produced in
a competent and professional manner the following • (hereinafter
collectively the "Report"):
Project Report
Environmental Impact' Report
Financial Plan and Revenue Program,
with respect to the Phase III Enlargement and Upgrading of the
Encina Water Pollution Control Facilities; and
WHEREAS, copies of said Report have been received by the
City Council of the City of Carlsbad, and it and the recommendations
contained therein are acceptable; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad desires
that Phase III Enlargement and Upgrading of the Encina Water
Pollution Control Facilities should go forward and be completed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
1 City of Carlsbad as follows:
2 1. The Report and the recommendations contained therein
3 are hereby approved.
4 2. This City Council approves going forward with the Phase
5 III Upgrading and Enlargement of the Encina Water Pollu-
6 tion Control Facilities in accordance with the recommenda-
7 tions of the Report.
8 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
9 Carlsbad, California at a regular meeting held the 17th day of
10 February / 1976, by the following vote, to wit:
11 AYES: Councilman Frazee, Chase, Lewis, Skotnicki and
Councilwoman Casler
12 NOES: None
13 ABSENT: None
14 ^
ROBERT C. FRAZEE, Mayor"
15
16 Attest:
17
18 &ai/gar/t E." "Adams^(tity Clerk
19 (seal)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28