HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-01-04; City Council; 4045; La Costa Land CompnayCITY OF CARLSBAD •Q
AGENDA BILL NO.
DATE: ' '
DEPARTMENT;
January 4, 1977
PLANNING
Initial:
Dept.Hd.
C. AttyVJaJ?
C. Mgr.
Subject:CASE NO: CT 76-17 and PUD-7
APPLICANT: LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
Stcatement of the Matter • ' . .
The request is for a resubdi vi si on of property situated in the north side of
La Costa Avenue between Cadencia and Gibraltar and a PUD 'to develop in the
PC Zone. • • .-
Orignially, the City approved a Tract Map (CT 72-20) and a Specific Plan
(SP-38) to develop this area as a multiple family condominium area. Pad
grading and street improvements were made, but development did not go forward
The applicant now wishes to resubdivide for a planned unit development ex-
panding the, street system with some additional grading. The new development
is for detached housing on lots averaging about 5000 square feet in area.
* « •
The City Council recently approved a partial Master PI an- Amendment in this
area which lowers the density to 6.5 du per ac. The subject request meets
this approved amendment.
The Planning Commission recommended approval as per Staff Report, with some
minor changes to the conditions.
Exhibits:
Memorandum to City Manager, dated December 29. 1Q76.
Planning Commission Resolution No: 1300 and 1301
St.aff Report dated December 8, 1976
Ex h i b i t s B , C, D & E
EIR Supplement • . _
the City Attorney be directed to prepare documents
PUD-7, as per Planning Commission Resolution No: 1300
Recommendation:
It is recommended that
approving CT 76-17 and
and 130i'.
Council action
1-4-.77 The City/Has directed to prepare the necessary documents for approval
in accordance with Planning Commission Resolutions #1300 and #1301, »
•with changes provided in Memorandum dated December 29, 1976 addressed^
to the City Manager; further that condition #6, page 5 of staff reporr
dated December 8, 1976'be changed to read Unit #2 instead of Unit #3.
^
£*e¥*»it3BiSfr
C
December 29, 1976
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ADDED CONDITIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTIONS 1300 AND 1301 - APPROVAL OF
CT 76-17 AND PUD-7
Staff suggests a modification of one condition and the adding of
another to the subject Resolutions. It is suggested that Condition
18 of Resolution 1301 be reworded as follows:
(18) Recreational vehicle storage is to be provided for
the use of the property owners who reside within
the PUD. Recreational vehicle spaces required
for this PUD shall not be used for another purpose.
The storage site shall be maintained by the
Homeowners Association of this PUD.
This change is more in keeping with the Ordinance requirement
(21.45.120(6)) and gives specific direction to the applicant as to
what is expected for the use, maintenance and the relation of the
site to the PUD.
The added condition is suggested for both the CT and PUD approving
Resolutions. They are:
Add Condition (8) to Resolution 1300 as follows:
(8) Prior to final map approval the applicant shall
secure approval of amendment to SP-38 to allow
development in accordance with CT 76-17.
And add Condition 20 to Resolution 1301 as follows:
(20) Approval of this request is not effective until the
applicant has secured approval of amendment to
SP-38 to allow development in accordance with PUD-7.
These added conditions are necessary since there is a Specific Plan
approved and effective on this site. Planning Staff did not note
this until after the legal notice had been published. The Planning
Commission noted in their approval that SP-38 needed an amendment;
however, the City Attorney has advised that amendment to an S.P.
requires full legal notice with public hearing. Staff will process
this amendment as soon as possible using information and the
property owner list supplied with the application for CT 76-17 and
PUD-7.
BP:cpl (12/29/76)
6
7
8
9
10
11
IE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1300
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOM-
MENDING APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP RE-
QUEST FOR A 212-LOT SUBDIVISION ON PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LA COSTA
AVENUE BETWEEN CADENCIA STREET AND GIBRALTAR.
CASE NO.: CT 76-17
APPLICANT: LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code,
the Planning Commission did on December 8, 1976, hold a duly
noticed public hearing to consider a request by La Costa Land
Company; and
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit
Assessor's Book No. 2233 Page 180, Parcels 1, 3-8
and 19-24. Assessor's Book No. 223, Page 200, Parcel
18
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided
by the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has complied with the Public Facility
Policy of the City of Carlsbad and has provided the necessary in-
formation which ensures Public Facilities will be available con--
current with need; and
WHEREAS, the proposed map meets or performs the requirements
or conditions of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code" or the Subdivision
Map Act; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, a staff report was presented and
all persons desiring to speak of the subject request were heard.
At the conclusion of said hearing, after considering all the
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
evidence presented, the Planning Commission made certain findings
and reached a decision on the request as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That the Planning Commission makes the following findings of
fact:
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because:
a) The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site
for residential Mediurn-Hiqh density (10-20 dwelling
units per acre). The subject property will provide
approximately 4.2 dwelling units per acre; and
b) Open Space and circulation are provided for in a
manner consistent with applicable Elements of the
General Plan and the adopted La Costa Master Plan.
2) The proposed map is consistent with the approved Master Plan
because:
a) A Master Plan Parcel Amendment was adopted by the City
Council (City Council Ordinance 9469) to allow a lower-
ing of allowable density for the subject, site.
3) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan because:
a) Public facilities will be available concurrent with
n e e d f o r t h e d e v e 1 o p m e n t.
4) The site is physically suitable for the^type of development
because:
a) The proposed development will not affect any unusual
topographic or geologic features on the site; and
b) Conditions of approval will ensure the above.
5) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development because:
a) Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the
allowable maximum density under the General Plan or
Master Plan; and
b) There are no significant physical features on the site
that would hinder development as planned.
- 2-
1
2
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6) Th
ar
su
th
a)
7) Th
no
' a)
8) Th
wi
la
po
a)
b)
9) Th
wa
sh
a)
C) Th+- 1-1tn
i s
1) Th
ca
PI
T U1 n
ot
as
le
2) Co
Wa
a)
b)
c)
The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements
are not 'likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or
their habitat because:
a) Adequate Supplemental Environmental Impact information
has been supplied to ensure the above.
The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are
not likely to cause serious public health problems, because:
a) Conditions of approval will ensure the above.
The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements required by the public at
large for access through or use of property within the pro-
posed subdivision because:
a) Open space and aprks facilities are adequately provided
and accessable to the public and to residents of the
PUD; and
b) Conditions -of approval will ensure the above.
The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public
waterways, rivers, streamss lakes, reservoirs5 coastlines, or
shorelines because:
The subdivision does not front on any of the above.
That in view of the findings heretofore made and considering
the applicable • law, the decision of the Planning Commission
is to approve CT 76-17 subject to the following conditions:
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the appli-
cation and any attachments thereto and as shown on the Plot
Plan submitted labeled Exhibit "C", dated November 12, 1976.
The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and
other facilities or features shall be located substantially
as shown on the plot plan labeled Exhibit "C", except or un-
less indicated otherwise herein.
Confirmation availability of service from the Leucadia County
Water District will terminate:
If the Tentative Map is not approved by the City within
6 months of November 19, 1976;
Eighteen months after approval or conditional approval
of the tentative map, if a final map is not recorded in
that period; and .
In the event of revisions of the tentative map which
affect the sewer system or sewer capacity.
- 3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
c
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
In order to provide for reasonable fire protection during
the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain
passable vehicular access to all buildings and adequate fire
hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as
recommended by the Fire Department.
Ornamental street lighting shall be provided for as required
by Municipal Ordinance. The developer shall deposit cash
in the amount necessary to energize said street lights for an
eighteen month period after construction, to permit the in-
corporation of the subdivision into a maintenance district.
All land and/or easements required shall be granted to the
City of Carlsbad without cost to the City and free of all liens
and encumbrances. No easements shall be recorded prior to
recordation of the final map unless approved by the City
Engineer.
New slopes over 5 feet vertical difference adjacent to public
streets shall be 2:1 maximum.
Proposed "A" Street shall have a 60 foot street section betwee
Retire Street and proposed "B" Street.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held on
the 8th day of December, 1976, by the Carlsbad Planning Commission
by the following vote, i o w i t :
AYES: Commissioners L'Heureuxs Watson,
Larson j Rombotis and Jose.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN:' None. ' C.
Fikes, Nelson.,
STEPHEN M. L'KEUREUX, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
BUD PLENDER, SECRETARY"
-4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1301
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CON-
CERNING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR
209 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LA COSTA AVENUE BE-
TWEEN CADENCIA STREET AND GIBRALTAR.
CASE NO. : PUD-7
APPLICANT: LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property, to
wit: .
Assessor's Book No. 223, Page 180, Parcels 1, 3-8
and 19-24; Assessor's Book No. 2235 Page 200, Parcel
18
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"; and
WHEREAS, at. said public hearing, upon hearing and consider-
ing the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who de-
sired to be. heard, said Commission considered all factors relating
to the Planned Unit Development and found the following facts and
reasons to ex 1st: *••
1) The proposed, use at the particular location is necessary and
desirable to provide a service or facility which will con-
tribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood, and
the community because:
a) The development will allow the subject property to be
developed to its allowable potential and density; and
b) The development will provide comprehensively planned
public park access and private amenities.
2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
vicinity or injurious t.o property or improvements in the
vicinity because:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
.17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a)
3) Th
mi
wi
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
NO
the Cit
A) Th
B) Th
th
i s
D
2)
3)
The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner similar
to the anticipated future development in the area.
The design criteria set forth in Section 21..45.110 and all
minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.120
will be met because:
The plot plan and additional exhibits include all
development aspects required;
The plot plan and additional exhibits include adequate
provision for open space, recreational facilities,
circulation and parking;
The project will be developed in a.manner to be .com-
patible with surrounding development;
Internal circulation is acceptable to the City Engineer
as shown on the plot plan and by conditions of approval;
Private recreational facilities, and public open space
are readily accessible; and
Dwelling unit density does not exceed the density allowed
in the underlying zone (P-C with Master Plan).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
T ha t the above recitations a re true and correct.
That in view of the findings heretofore made and considering
the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commission
is to approved PUD-7, subject to the following conditions:
The approval is granted for the land described in the
application and any attachments thereto, and as shown
on the Plot Plan submitted labeled Exhibit B, dated
11/1/76, Exhibit C5 dated 11/12/76, Exhibit D, dated
11/12/76, and Exhibit E, dated 11/12/76. The location
of all roadways, parking areas* landscaping and other
facilities or features shall be located substantially
as shown on Exhibits B, C, D and E unless'otherwise
provided herein.
All conditions shall be appropriately completed and the
project commenced within 18 months from final City
action.
The set backs or yards are as follows:
a) Front Yard - minimum 20.00 feet from the right-
of-way line to the front line of the building.
-2-
C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
k) Rear Yard - minimum 10.00 feet from the rear line
of the" building to the rear lot line or street
right-of-way line on. through lots.
c) Side Yards :
1) The side yard adjacent to a lower pad shall
be a minimum of 5.00 feet from building line
to property 1i ne.
2) The side yard adjacent to a pad that is 3.00
\ feet, or less, higher shall be a minimum of
5.00 feet from building line to property line.
3) The side yard adjacent to a pad that is more
. than 3.00 feet higher shall be a minimum of
7.50 feet from building line to property line.
4) Minimum distance between buildings shall be
'• '10.00 feet.
4) Any structure that has a foundation or decking and that
extends higher than 3 feet from the ground level, such
as patio covers, etc., shall not be constructed closer
than 5 feet from any rear property line o>~ any slope,
or 5 feet from any side lot line or slope.
5) A landscape, irrigation, surfacing and fencing plan for
the recreational vehicle storage area shown on Exhibit
C5 shall be submitted to the Planning Director, Parks
and Recreation Director and City Engineer for their
approval prior to issuance of grading permits.
6) Facilities on lots 210, 211 and 212 as shown on Exhibit
C shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Parks
and Recreation Director prior to building permit
issuance for Unit 3.(.,
7) Provision for electrical facilities on lots 210, 211
and 212 will be provided to t he s a t i s f a c t i o n of the
Parks and Recreation Director.
8) Facilities such as picnic tables, fences , - etc., .wi11 be
provided on lots 210, 211 and 212 as required by the
Parks and Recreation Director.
9) The asphalt trail shown on Exhibit E shall be 6' wide
minimum.
10) The concrete walk shown on Exhibit D shall be 7' and 5'
as shown on the exhibit.
11) The 20' access easement between lots 103 and 104 shall
be^ fenced to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation
Director.
-3-
12) .A barrier will be placed on the western portion of lot
210 to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation
2 Director
3 13) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City
Engineer shall approve a plan submitted by the appli-
4 cant for interim erosion control on all man-made slopes
in excess of five feet created by this subdivision.
5 Prior to this issuance of grading permits, the applicant
shall post bonds and agreements ensuring the installation
6 and maintenance of the erosion control system until
permanent landscaping is installed and maintained.
7
14) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the
8 applicant shall submit a permanent landscaping and
irrigation plan to the Parks and Recreation Director
for his approval. The plan shall include all artificial
slopes. These slopes shall:
10
a) Utilize fire-retardant, drought-resistant 1 a n d -
11 scaping which includes trees and shrubs which reach
variety of sizes at maturity; and
12
b) Utilize an irrigation system appropriate for common
13 maintenance of the required landscaping in confer-
ma nee with Conditions 15 and 15.
14
15) Permanent landscaping and irrigation shall be installed
15 on all lots identified in Condition 13 before any of
those lots are occupied. If residential construction
occurs in units,, this condition shall be met on a unit-
by-uiri t bas i s .
17
16) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the provision
of .permanent open space maintenance on those areas as
indicated in Condition 14 shall be assured to the s a t i s-
faction of the Planning Director. Such maintenance may
be assured by the formation of an Qpen Space Maintenance
20 District, Homeowners' Association or similar institution
suitable for commonly maintaining open space,
*C- J-
17) CC&Rs for the project will be submitted to the Planning
22 Director for approve! prior to issuance of building
permits.23
18) Provision for the exclusive use of the Recreational
24 Vehicle lot shown on Exhibit C for the subject PUD, as
provided for under Section 21 .45.120(b) , shall be
25 accomplished to the satisfaction of the City Attorney
prior to issuance of building permits for the 1st phase.
19) Access easemen'ts will be provided along the lot lines
27 with abutting structures to allow building maintenance
from adjacent property.28
18
1
2
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
of Carlsbad Planning Connrii'ssion held on December 8, 1976, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Cornrni si soners L'Heureux, Watson, Fikes, Nelson,
Larson, P, o m b o t i s a n d Jose.
NOES: None,
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
STEPHEN M. L'HEUREUX, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST
BUD _'ETr SlEcTilTARf
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
C .*-s
-^X '
STAFF REPORT
December 8, 1976
JO: DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE NO: CT 76-17 and PUD-7
APPLICANT: LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
REQUEST: Deletion of portions of SP-38 and resubdivisi on of
approximately 50 acres to provide 212 Tots and 209
residential units in a Planned Unit Development.
SECTION I; RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends deletion of those portions of SP-38 within the
boundaries of the Vale Unit II boundaries and APPROVAL of Carlsbad
'Tract 76-17 and PUD-7 for the following reasons and subject
to the .following conditions:
FINDINGS (CT 76-17)
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General.Plan because:
a) The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site for
Residential Medium-High density (10-20 dwelling units
per acre). The subject project will provide approxi-
mately 4.2 dwelling units per acre; and
b) Open Space arid circulation are provided for in a manner
consistent with applicable Elements of the General Plan
and the adopted La Costa Master Plan.
2) The proposed map is consistent with the approved Master Plan
because:
a) A Master Plan Parcel Amendment was adopted by the City
Council (City Council Ordinance 9469) to allow a lowering
of allowable density for the subject site.
3) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con-
sistent with the General Plan because:
a) Public facilities will be available concurrent with need
for the development.
4) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
because:
a) The proposed development will not affect any unusual
topographic or geologic features on the site; and
b) Conditions of approval will ensure the above.
5) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development because:
a) Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the
allowable maximum density under the General Plan or
Master Plan; and
b) There are no significant physical features on the
site that would hinder development as planned.
6) The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or
their habitat because:
a) Adequate Supplemental Environmental Impact information
has been supplied to ensure the above.
7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
are not likely to cause serious public health problems because
a)" Conditions of approval will ensure the above.
8) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements required by the public at
large for access through or use of property within the pro-
posed subdivision because:
a) Open space and parks facilities are adequately provided
and accessable to the public and to residents of the
PUD; and
b) Conditions of approval will ensure the above.
9) The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public
waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines, or
shorelines because:.
a) The subdivision does not front on any of the above.
CONDITIONS (CT 76-17)
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the appli-
cation and any attachments thereto and as shown on the Plot
Plan submitted labeled Exhibit "C", dated November 12, 1976.
The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and
other facilities or features shall be located substantially
as shown on the plot plan labeled Exhibit "C", except or un-
less indicated otherwise herein.
-2-
w
2) Confirmation availability of service from the Leucadia County
Water District will terminate :
a) If the Tentative Map is not approved by the. City within
6 months of November 19, 1976;
b) Eighteen months after approval or conditional approval
of the tentative map, if a final map is not recorded in
that period; and
c) In the event of. revisions of the tentative map which affect
the sewer system or sewer capacity.
3) In order to provide for reasonable fire protection during
the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain
passable vehicular access to all buildings and adequate
fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed
as recommended by the Fire Department.
4) Ornamental street lighting shall be provided for as re-
quired by Municipal Ordinance. The developer shall deposit
cash in the amount necessary to energize said street lights
for an eighteen month period after construction, to permit
the incorporation of the subdivision into a maintenance
district.
5) All land and/or easements required shall be granted to
the City of Carlsbad without cost to the City, and free
of all liens and encumbrances. No easements shall be re-
corded prior to recordation of the final map unless approved
by the City Engineer.
6) New slopes over 5 feet vertical difference adjacent to public
streets shall be 2:1 maximum.
7) Proposed "A" Street shall have a 60 foot street section between
Retire Street and proposed "B" Street.
FINDINGS: PUD-7
1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and
desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute
to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community
because: •
a) The development will allow the subject property to be
developed to its allowable potential and density; and
'b) The development will provide comprehensively planned j
public park access and private amenities.
2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity because:
a) The proposed PUD w.i 11 be developed in a manner similar
to the anticipated future development in the area. .14
3) The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 and all
minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.120
will be met because:
a) The plot plan and additional exhibits include all de-
velopment aspects required;
b) The plot plan and additional exhibits include adequate
provision for open space, recreational facilities, circu-
lationand park ing.
c) The project will be developed in a manner to be compatible
with surrounding development;
d) Internal circulation is acceptable to the City Engineer
as shown on the plot plan and by conditions of approval;
e) Private recreational facilities, and public open space
are readily accessible; and
f) Dwelling unit density does not exceed the density allowed
in the underlying zone (P-C with Master Plan).
CONDITIONS (PUD-7)
1) Th"e approval is granted for the land described .in the applica-
tion and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the Plot Plan
submitted labeled Exhibit B, dated 11/1/76, Exhibit C dated
11/12/76, Exhibit D dated 11/12/76 and Exhibit E dated 11/12/76.
The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and
other facilities or features shall be located substantially as
shown on Exhibits B, C5 D and E unless otherwise provided herein.
2) All conditions shall be appropriately completed and the project
commenced within 18 months from final City action.
3) The set backs 'or yards are as follows:
a) Front Yard - minimum 20.00 feet from the right-of-way
line to the front line of the building.
b) Rear Yard - minimum 10.00 feet from the rear line of
the building to the rear lot line or street right-of-way
line on through lots.
c) Side Yards :
1) The side yard adjacent to a lower pad shall be a
minimum of 5.00 feet from building line to property
line. »
2) The side yard adjacent to a pad that is 3.00 feet, \
or less, higher shall be a minimum of 5.00 feet
from building line to property line.
3) The side yard adjacent to a pad that is more than
3.00 feet higher shall be a minimum of 7.50 feet
from building line to property line.
4) Minimum distance between buildings shall be 10.00
feet.
-.4-
4)
5)
6)
7)
Any structure that
higher than 3 feet
etc. , shal1 not be
rear property line
line or slope.
has a foundation or decking and that extends
from the ground level, such as patio covers,
constructed closer than 5 feet from any
or any slope, or 5 feet from any side lot
irrigation, surfacing and fencing plan for the
vehicle storage area shown on Exhibit C, shall
to the Planning Director, Parks and Recreation
City Engineer for their approval prior to issuance
A landscape,
recreational
be submitted
Director and
of grading permits.
Facilities on lots 210, 211, arid 212 as shown on Exhibit (
shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Parks and
Recreation Director prior to building permit issuance for
Unit 3.
Provision for electrical facilities on lots
will be provided to the satisfaction of the
tion D-i rector.
210, 211 and 212
Parks and Recre-a-'
8) Facilities such as picnic tables, fences, etc., will be pro-
vided on lots 210, 211, and 212 as required by the Parks and
Recreation Director.
9) The asphalt trail shown on Exhibit E shall be 6' wide minimum.
10) The concrete walk shown on Exhibit D shall be 7' and 5' as shown
on the exhibit.
11) The 20' access easement between lots 103 and 104 shall be
fenced to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation
Di rector.
12) A barrier will be placed on the western portion of lot
210 to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Director.
13) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City Engineer
shall approve a plan submitted by the applicant for interim
erosion control on all man-made slopes in excess of five feet
created by this subdivision. Prior to this issuance of
grading permits, the applicant shall post bonds and agreements
ensuring the installation and maintenace of the erosion control
system until permanent landscaping is installed and maintained.
14) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant
shall submit a permanent landscaping and irrigation plan to the
Parks and Recreation Director for his approval. The plan shall
include all artificial slopes. These slopes shall:
a) Utilize fire~retardant, drought-resi sta'nt landscaping
which includes trees and shrubs which reach a variety
of sizes at maturity; and
b) Utilize an irrigation system appropriate for common main-
tenance of the required landscaping in conformance with
conditions 14, 15 and 16.
-5-/ 4
3 ' • '
15) Permanent landscaping and irrigation shall be installed on all
lots identified in Condition . 13 before any of those lots are
occupied. If residential construction occurs in units, this
condition shall be met on a unit-by-unit basis.
16) Prior to approval of a final subdivision map for any portion of
the PUD area, the applicant shall file with the Clerk of the
City of Carlsbad a petition for the formation of an Open Space
Maintenance District, as provided for in Section 50590 of the
California State Government Code, to provide maintenance of
those areas described in Condition 13. The applicant shall
maintain these areas ans all landscaping installed in con-
formance with Conditions 13 and 14 until such time as an Open
Space Maintenance District is established and accepts main-
tenance responsibilities as prescribed in the Open Space -
Maintenance Act, or until maintenance responsibility is accepted
by another entity acceptable to the City.
17) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the provision of
permanent open space maintenance shall be assured to the
. satisfaction of the City Manager. If the City Council has not
for any reason formed an Open Space Maintenance District as
petitioned by the applicant in conformance with Condition 15,
the applicant shall form a Homeowners' Association to perform
maintenance by another entity acceptable to the City Manager.
18) CC&Rs for the project will be submitted to the Planning
Director for approval prior to issuance of building permits.
19) Provision for the exclusive use of the.Recreational Vehicle
lot shown on Exhibit C for the subject PUD, as provided for
under Section 21.45.120(b), shall be accomplished to -the
satisfaction of the City Attorney prior to issuance of build-
ings permits for the 1st phase.
20) Access easements will be provided along the lot lines with
abutting structures to allow building maintenance from adja-
cent property.
SECTION II: BACKGROUND
Location and Description of Property:
The 50 acre site is located on the North side of La Costa Avenue
between Cadencia Street and Gibraltar.
The parcel has been previously subdivided for multiple family
residential. Street improvements are existing, and building pads
have been created.
Modification of existing street systems, building pad grades and
new curb cuts will be necessary to'accommodate the subject proposal.
-6-
The property is characterized by rolling ropography with a number
of natural dra.inage areas.
A San Diego Gas and Electric power easement runs across the northern
boundary of the project.
A portion of a public dedicated park lies to the south of the San
Diego Gas and Electric easement.
Existing Zoning: •
Subject Property: Planned Community
North: Planned Community
South: R-l-7500
East: Planned Community
West: Planned Community and RDM
Existing Land Use:
Subject Property: Vacant
North: Vacant
South: Single family homes and Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
Past History and Related Cases:
The City Council approved CT 72-20 and SP-38 to accommodate Vale
Units II and III (Resolution Nos. 3128 and 3129, June 5, 1973).
Final maps for both units were subsequently approved.
The City Council approved CT 74-11 for a portion of the Vale II
area to allow 48 condominium units of 4.4 acres (City Countil
Resolution No. 3509 dated September 17, 1974). This approval has
expired.
A partial La Costa Master Plan amendment has been approved for the
subject parcel that lowers the allowable Master Plan density, up
to 6.5 dwelling units per acre.
General Plan Information:
The Vale subdivisions were originally approved under the old General
Plan. The old General Plan allowed higher densitites than the current
General Plan.
The current General Plan designates the area for RM-H (10-20 dwelling
units per acre).
Environmental Impact Information:
Environmental Impact Report No. 35 was certified at the time of
approval of CT 72-20 and SP-38.
Supplemental information has been supplied by the applicant to the
satisfaction of staff.
The project therefore conforms to the Carlsbad Environmental Pro-
tection Ordinance by Prior Compliance (Section 19.04.153).
Public Facilities:
The site is within the water and sewer service areas of the Olivenhain
Municipal and Leu cadi a County Water Districts.
San Dieguito Union High School District and Encinitas Elementary
School Districts provide school facilities for the area.
Major Planning Considerations:
1. Does the proposal conform to the General Plan and Master Plan?
2. Does the proposal conform to the basic standards and intent
of the PUD section of Title 21?
SECTION III: DISCUSSION
It has been established in previous requests that if a project
density does not exceed the General Plan allowable density it can
be approved.
In the case of the subject subdivision, a specific amendment to the
La Costa Master Plan was adopted by the City Council to allow for a
lowering of density in the subject area.
As a result, staff feels that the subject requests confrom to the
General Plan and Master Plan.
Staff finds that the project as proposed meets the basic requirements
of the Planned Unit Development development criteria.
The proximity of the project to the dedicated public park site and
its provision to incorporate the public and private amenities (physical
ly and visually) into the project design provide a basis for the PUD
concept and intent.
The project will provide single family detached dwelling units
.on relatively small lots. The average lot size is about 5000
sq. ft. with 50 feet of street frontage.
A zero-lot-line concept will be used in building location. This
method provides one wide side yard (approximately 10 ft.) and one
zero-side yard. The structure is built along one side lot line
(see Exhibit B). This concept maximizes the usable portion of
the lot width and also allows for adequate setbacks between structures.
-8-
Staff is concerned, however, about one aspect of the applicant's pro-
posal under the PUD concept. The applicant has informed staff that a
fee is intended for the Recreational Vehicle storage facilities.
The ordinance does not specifically mention fees in relation to the
required storage facilities, however, staff feels that because of
the small lots, some off-site provision for storage should be guaran-
teed to residents of the PUD without substantial cost.
Because of the precedent setting nature of this question, staff
feels that the Planning Commission should make a policy decision
on this matter.
If the Planning Commission wishes to approve the PUD with no-cost
R-V storage, a specific condition of approval providing for this
would be in order.
The applicant has also requested the following in regard to parks
requi rements: •
-Parks:
"Canon Parks Units 1 to 3 represents a resubdivision of part of the
La Costa Vale II subdivision.' Technically, the dedication required
for this park on the new subdivision, as we calculate it, would be
3.47 acres, less .87 acres because of a 25% credit for private
amenities, or 2.6 acres.
However, this property has already contributed r.35 acres, through
the previous Vale II Canon Park dedication. As part of the applica-
tion for this map, we inform you that we will request that the City
Council waive any further park requirement for this project. Further,
while we realize that under your Attorney's opinon, La Costa can re-
ceive no specific credit for the 1.75 additional acres, we certainly
think that in considering this total project that the facts above
should be recognized."
The Parks and Recreation Director has reviewed this request and
concurs with the applicant.
TH:mdp ' '
(12/3/76) '-. •
Attachments:
Exhibits B(l) - a, b, c and d.
Exhibits B, C, D and E
School Letters (San Dieguito, Encinitas)
EIR Supplement
..2-0
;:*•/
s/AUE IJ
~I
LA Co ST
!tf= so
.SAN BIEGUITO
UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT-
2151 NEWCASTLE, CARDIFF, CAllFORiiiA 920Q7
August 11, 1976
7H-753-S491
City of Carlsbad
3.200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92GOS
' Gentlemen
RE: Canyon Park Unit No. 1
Our district has reviewed the proposed __21_0 unit development
generally located in La Costa '
and have evaluated the impact of that development on tbe facil-
ities of our district.
/
Please be/informed that our district is able to assure you that '
^scbool facilities and services vri.ll be available concurrent with
need for this development. • - •
/ *
Very truly yours •
(\ a\\ ^ /3-Q-
William A. Berrier
Superintendent
' CITY OFPlanning Department COPY
BOARD OF TRUSTEESi
ADMINISTRATION!
Doujlii M. Touquel,
Pfojld«nl
J»ck R. Stevent,
Vlc« Preildont
WlllUm A. Dertl«r,
Dtnltl J. Rodrl$u«t,
C!%rk
Robort A. Morion,
AliliUnt SupaflnleocJant
O»v|d H. Thompson Don W. Mli
John J. Dilly.
,1* . «'
* " '.-CLARKE
..tSiOCNT
i.G. MUNOZ. PH. D.
jOUGLAS J. HOLLOW AY
CLERK
i/ARYLOUSCHULTZ
LORETTAM. SMITH
ROBERT L. BRICKMAN. PH.O._
Ui'tRlNTf.NDENT b BOARD SECRETARY"
S Pinion ikljool District
189 UNION STREET.
' f
ENCJNiTAS. CALIFORNIA 92074
TELEPHONE 753-1
CAPRI SCHOOL
• -&-1I CAPRI R0*0
CENTRAL SCHOOL
IDS UWON sii'.ttr
OCEAN KNOLL SCHOOL
910MELBA.ROAO'*
PACIFIC VIEW SCHOOL
600 THIRD STREET
PARK DALE LANE SCHOOL
JOCO PARK DAVE LANE
August 9, 1976
BEST
COPY
Donald Agatep, Planning Director
City of Carlsbad
Carlsbad} California • • .
Dear Don: " • • -
(1) Re: ' Project at. La Costa^ Vale #2 (210 Dingle family units)
.An-agreement exists between La Costa-Land Development Company and this
District whereby a portion of a school site has been made available to
us covering this project. " ' ' -
j-
(2) Re: Monte Vista Unit //,!^(215 single family units)-t
This projectj a portion of Santa Fe Knollss is covered by a tentative
agreement between this school district and La Costa Land Development
Company whereby a school site will be provided in the vicinity of the
project. Prior to approval of a tentative map, we expect delineation
of the exact site location.
* , ^
The Board of Trustees has been made aware of La Costa's Master Plan.
Sincerely, , • • • . .
Robert L. Brickraan, Ph. D.
Superintendent
RLB:h
cc: Fred.Morey
Of