HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-02-01; City Council; 4058; General Plan amendment to Land Use ElementCITY OF CARLSBAD
* ~*9O £<£AGENDA BILL NO.
DATE: ___ FFRRllARY 1 , 1Q77
Initial:. CO
Dept. Hd~.fV/-l-?
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
City At ty
City Mgr.
SUBJLCT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT
INVOLVING CHANGE FROM PI (PLANNED' INDUSTRIAL)
TO TS (TRAVEL SERVICES COMMERCIAL) DESIGNATION - GPA-40
STATEMENT OF THE MATTER
On January 12, 1977, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to
consider an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan (GPA-40 -
Applicant: Peggy Hadley). At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission
recommended the following:
Change the designation from PI (Planned Industrial) to
TS (Travel Services) on approximately six (6) acres of
land on the west side of Paseo del Norte, between Palomar
Airport Road and Altamira residential development.
Exhibits :
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1312
Exhibit A, GPA-40,
Memo from Planning
Memo from Planning
Letter from Banche
Recommendation:
1/18/77
Department to PI anning 'Commission
Department to Planning Commission.
to Planning Department, 12/22/76.
1/12/77.
11/22/76
If the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission,
instruct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary documents for approval as
per Planning Commission Resolution No. 1312.
Council action
'2-1-77 Following the public hearing the City Attorney was instructed to
prepare documents necessary for approval in accordance with Planning
Commission Resolution #1312.
FORM PLANNING 73
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1312
2 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
v THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
0 RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION
A OF GPA-40, A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM
4 PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO TRAVEL SERVICES
R DESIGNATION ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
D ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOWDER LANE BETWEEN
fi PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND THE ALTA MIRA
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
„ CASE NO.: GPA-40
I APPLICANT: PEGGY HADLEY
Q
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property,
g as shown on the attached map, has been filed with the City of
Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
11 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
12 as provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code;" and
13 WHEREAS, the public hearing was held at the time and in
14 the place specified in the public notice on January 12, 1977; and
15 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consider-
-i /»
ing the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who
17 desired to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
18 relating to the General Plan Amendment and found the following
19 facts and reasons to exist:
20 1) Paseo del Norte will be able to accommodate the expected
on increase of traffic generated by the "TS" designation.
2) There is the possibility of eliminating most or all of
the expected problems that might arise from uses permitted
by the "TS" designation with future zone overlays requiring
site development plan approval.
24 3) Retaining the "PI" designation on the east side of
Paseo del Norte maintains the viability of planned indust-
rial development in that area. The "TS" designation on
the west side of Paseo del Norte would not significantly
interfere with the potential.
2r
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
28 of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
'l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
"I A14
15
16
17
18
19•i- **
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That the recommendation is made to the City Council to
adopt a General Plan Amendment to change the Planned
Industrial
on property
designation to Travel Services designation
generally located on the west side of
Paseo del Norte between Palomar Airport Road and the
Alta Mira residential development.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City of Carlsbad
by the following
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
• •
ATTEST:
06 / ^iLtsyji^L V X&/**
RALPH S. PLENDER
-
,
Planning Commission held on January 12, 1977
vote, to wit:
Commissioners Larson, Nelson, Jose,
Watson and L'Heureux.
None.
Commissioners Rombotis and Fikes.
None. s, /]
& " ^-r
\ r ^^BRIC LARSON, CHAIRMAN
JL
, SECRETARY
-2-
-J
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
P
\ r
EXHIBIT A
GPA-40
1-18-77
MEMORANDUM
January 12, 1977
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE NO: GPA-40 (SUPPLEMENT #1)
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
(LAND USE ELEMENT) FROM PI (PLANNED
INDUSTRIAL) TO RRE (EXTENSIVE REGIONAL
RETAIL).
APPLICANT: PEGGY R. HADLEY
BACKGROUND:
On November 22, 1976, the Planning Commission considered a request
almost identical to this one (Staff Report Attached). It was
apparent that the majority of the Planning Commission would have
supported some form of Commercial Land Use at that time but they
could not agree on the actual designation nor the area. Because
of the limitation on the number of General Plan Amendments per-
mitted each year,, the applicant's agent requested a denial so he
could appeal to the Council before the end of the year.
Because of additional timing problems with appeals, the applicant
decided to amend the request and asked the Planning Commission to
reconsider the item. That amended request i.s now before you.
DESCRIPTION OF AMENDED REQUEST:
The applicant's representative has requested deletion of that property
on the east side of Paseo del Norte that was included in the original
request. The agent also has asked that the possibility of a "TS"
(Travel Service) designation be considered as a viable alternative to
the request of "RRE" (Extensive Regional Retail) (Letter Attached).
The applicant is suggesting the "TS" alternative because there is
presently no zone available to implement the "RRE" designation.' The
City is processing a new zone that would implement the "TS" designation
Just about all of the possible uses the applicant desires are expected
to be permitted in this new zone.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff still recommends DENIAL of the "RRE"'designation for the reasons
outlined on the attached Staff Report.
-1 -
ALTERNATIVE:
Staff roconunen cl 5 _A_P_EJU) V AL. of the "TS" design a t Ion for t.he f o 11 owi n g
reasons:
1) Pas e o del N o r t. e w ill be able to a c c o mm o rl a t e t. h e e x p e c t e d i n c r e a s e
o f t. r a f fie g e n e r a t e ci b y t h e " T S" d c s i g n a t i o n .
f
2) There 'is the possibility of eliminating most or all of the ex- •
pected problems that might arise from uses permitted by the "TS"
designation with future zone overlays requiring site development
pi an approval.
3) Retaining the "PI" designation on the east side of Paseo del
Norte maintains the viability of planned industrial development
in that area. The "TS" designation on the west side of Paseo
del Norte would not significantly interfere with that potential.
MZ:ar
(1/11/77)
MEMORANDUM
.November 22, 1976
TO:' PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE NO'.: GPA-40
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM P-I (PLANNED
INDUSTRIAL TO RRE (EXTENSIVE REGIONAL RETAIL)
APPLICANT: PEGGY R. HADLEY
SECTION I: RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends GPA-40 be DENIED because of the following findings:
(1) The increase of traffic due to the potential, intense commercial
uses permitted by the RRE designation would create an adverse
impact to the surrounding residential and industrial properties,
both existing and potential.
(2) The elimination of the Planned Industrial designation on this
property would decrease the viability of planned industrial
development on the remaining, surrounding properties.
(3) Some of the desired commercial uses are already permitted
under the existing Specific Plan with approval of a Condi-
tional Use Perm it. -
SECTION II; STAFF BACKGROUND REPORT
Location 'and Description of Property: .
The subject property is located on the east and west side of Paseo
del Norte, between Palomar Airport Road and the Altamira development,
The 9.04 acres of property are irregular in shape with approximately
1,490 feet of frontage along Paseo del Norte.
Rough grading has taken place on the property. A drainage channel
lies along the southerly end of the westerly parcel.
The Encina Water' Pol 1 ution Co'ntrol Facility lies to the southwest,
on the west side of Interstate 5. This facility periodically omits
odors that would affect this- propferty.
E'xi sting Zo'11 ng :
Subject Parcel: M with Specific Plan
North: M
East: P-M and M with Specific Plan
South: P-C (Commercial)
West: P-M and P-U
SurrounjJjjng_Land Use :
Subject Parcel: Vacant
North: Hadley Orchards/Cal-Mi 1 Plastics
East: Vacant (McReynolds)
South: Vacant (Altarm'ra)
'. West: I-5/EWPCF/Avenida Encinas industrial
area
Past History and Related Cases:
The parcel on the east side of Paseo del Norte was split in 1975
(MS #266). A Conditional Use Permit (CUP-109) was approved on the
one (1) acre portion for a restaurant.
All of the property in this application is zoned "M" (Industrial).
In 1972, a Specific Plan (SP-23A) was approved for the area that
applied all of the performance standards.(except for setbacks) and
use restrictions contained in the "P-M" (Planned Industrie!) zone.
the easterly parcel.
reel
Environmental Impact Information^
An Environmental Impact Assessment has been filed and a Negative
Declaration issued for the following reason:
(1) The lots are graded and adjacent to existing development,
therefore, impacts on the natural environment will be minimal.
General PI an Infor mat i on:
In addition to this property, the two parcels already mentioned to
the north and a larger parcel to the east are also designated as
"PI" (Planned Industrial) on the Land Use Plan (See attached exhibit). •
Public Fact! ities :
The project location falls within the water and sewer service boundaries
of the City. Regardless of what project eventually goes in this area,
major improvements to the water system will ultimately have to be im-
proved.
- 2 -
Any new development requiring more than 2100 gpm fire flow would require
at least one of the following improvements:
(1) Installation of a metering vault and pressure regulator to
connect the City's system to the CMWD system. The cost of
this improvement is estimated at $25,000 to $50,000. The
potential for reimbursement funds would not be as great for
this improvement as for alternative No. (2).
(2) Connect the Paseo del Norte line with the Avenida Encinas
line by looping the system under the freeway. The cost of
this improvement is estimated at $50,000 to $80,000.
Major Planning Considerations:
(1) Are there potential uses permitted under the RRE designation
that would be significantly more intense than uses permitted
by the PI designation?
(2) Would the elimination of this property from the area's PI desig-
nation decrease the viability of development of the remaining
properties?
SECTION III: DISCUSSION
The descriptions of the existing (PI) and proposed (RRE) designa-
tions in the Land Use Element read as follows:
Planned Industrial (PI):
The Land Use Map designates those areas currently used for,
proposed as, or adjacent to industrial development, including
manufacturing, warehousing, storage, research and development,
and utility uses. Agricultural and outdoor recreation uses on
lots of one acre or more are considered to be a proper interim
use for industrially designated areas.
Extensive Regional Retail (RRE):
These commercial areas include a wide range of establishments
dealing in large, low volume, high cost items such as furni-
ture, automobiles (new and used), lumber and building materials,
boats, mobile homes, farm machinery and garden supplies. Exten-
sive shopping establishments are similar in market and popula-
tion requirements to intensive shopping establishments, but,
because of the cost of the items sold and the infrequency of
purchase, customers are willing to travel greater distances to
compare price and quality. In response to the wide range of
items sold and the varied physical and transportation require-
ments involved, these establishments are rarcl'y suited to
planned shopping centers (except for household furnishings such
as furniture and appliances) and seek locations accessible to
a large population because they have a relatively low patron
frequency. Intersections of primary streets, or near these
intersections along a major arterial, meet their access needs.
Tfleir location should be near developments with similar physical
characteristics, suitably separated from residential areas.
Because of wide variety in their development, extensive storage
and display needs, activities, these establishments cannot be
-organized into independent functional shopping centers. The
general space requirements for extensive shopping needs is one
acre per 1000 families.
The subject property meets many of the requirements of the RRE
designation with one basic exception, i.e., the location should be
suitably separated from residential areas. Paseo del Norte serves
as the major ingress and egress to the Altamira residential develop-
ment. Some of the more intense uses permitted with the RRE desig-
nation could create significant traffic congestion and safety pro-
blems along Paseo del Norte during their operating hours (e.g. 9:00
A.M. to 9:00 P.M.). Most uses permitted under the existing desig-
nation of PI would basically only impact traffic during the peak
work-trip periods (e.g. 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.) An example of an
ideal area for the RRE designation would be along Paseo del Norte
between Palomar Airport Road and Cannon Road.
Excluding the Hadley's and Cal-Mil properties because they are
already-developed leaves a total of approximately forty-one (41)
acres designated as "PI" with good street frontage accessibility
(approximately 1100 feet along each side). the elimination of
the subject property from the planned industrial designation would
leave only about 700 feet on one side for access and a total of
about 32 acres for planned industrial uses. This decrease of usable
"PI" property and frontage could substantially affect the viability
of the remaining area developing as a cohesive planned industrial
area.
Evidently the applicant is requesting a General Plan change
to provide for commercial retail development. The existing
"M" zoning with adopted Specific Plan provides for certain
commercial uses by Conditional Use Permit - they are:
Restaurants, and other retial uses limited to
sales of goods and services required for the
convenience of occupants of the subject zone.
MZ:TCH:mdp
(8/6/76)
Attachment:
Map showing existing Land Use designations and uses.
-4-
LAW OFFICES OF
DAUBNEY, BANCHE, PATTERSON AND REED
WILL.AM H. DAUBNEY . A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION AREA CODE 7.4
NICHOLAS C. BANCHE 70S FOURTH STREET TELEPHONE 722-1861
JOHN E. PATTERSON
- POST OFFICE BOX 39O
KENNETH E. HEC1D
JAMES A. TESTA OCEANBIDn, CALIFORNIA 33054
December 22, 1976
Planning Department
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attention: Mike Zander
RE: GPA-40
Dear Mr. Zander:
Please accept this letter as a request to amend the existing
application with regard to the above.
The amendment involves the elimination of all land of the
applicant lying East of Paseo Del Norte and further, asks
that the land use designation include the possibility of a
tourist service classification as a viable alternative to the
request of extensive regional retail.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
NrCHOLAS C. BANCHE
NCB:jp
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
(6PA-40)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad
will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 1, 1977, at 7:00 P.M.
in the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, to
consider a General Plan Amendment (Land Use Element) from Planned Industrial
(PI) to Travel Services Commercial (TS) designation on property generally
located on the West side or Paseo del Norte between Palomar Airport Road
and the Alta Mira Residential Development and as shown on the map below:
APPLICANT: PEGGY R. HADLEY
Publish: January 19, 1977
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
-J PALOMAR AIRPORF RD
P
\ r
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
GPA-40
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the
City of Carlsbad will hold a Public Hearing on Wednesday,
January 12, 1977, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers,
1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, to consider a General Plan
Amendment (Land Use Element) from Planned Industrial to Travel
Services Commercial designation on property generally located on
the West side of Paseo del Norte between Palomar Airport Road and
the Alta Mira' Residential Development and as shown on the map below.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially
invited to attend the Public Hearing. If you have any questions,
please call 729-1181 and ask for the Planning Department.
APPLICANT:
PUBLISH:
PEGGY R. HADLEY
December 29, 1976 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING
DEPARTMENT
-J
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
\ f
: Encina Water Pollution
Control Facility6200 Avenida Encinas
'-• Carlsbad, CA 92008
• V
ir' ' "Games & Alice Winslow
6100 Avenida Encinas
• Carlsbad, CA 92008
Marshall F. Lamore _
1504 la Coronilla Drive
Santa Barbara, CA 93109
James and Dorothy Gaiser
3784 Skyline Rd.
Carlsbad, CA 92008 •
GPA.-40
& Madalena Ecke
P.O. Box 488 '
Encinitas, CA 92024
Peggy Hadley . .
:6115 Paseo del Norte
Carlsbad, CA 92008
.'Nicholas C. Banche
'Attorney at Law
.-Post Off-ice Box 390
'Oceanside, CA 92054
Calif. St. Rd. Maintenance
.Station6050 Lowder Lane ~ -
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Cal-Mil Plastic Products
•6100"Lower Lane
Carload, CA 9£008
Andrew McReynolds
2316 Calle Chiquita
La Jolla, CA 92037
Takashima USA, Inc.
c/o ShermarrA. Itlaner
3435 Wilshire Blvd, #1428
Los Angeles, California •
M
: i
f. '-
\ *i -,b
Financial Scene Inc.
p-0: Box 6474
San Diego, CA 92112