HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-02-15; City Council; 4074; La Costa Master Archaeological SurveyI *a ,
b -- * "CT,TY - -I__ OF __I-- C:;RLSi:;D --
I rl i ti a1 :
Dept- Hd. -- 6 --_- --- A(; Eljjl.;-% 3 j i, t. EO e +J-./
........ ...
. -- February l5, 1977 I_
D)$l'E: . .---- C i i;y fit t,y -
............. ....... .. City Mgr. -.
L ~-- ' . PLANNING
...... ----- D E PA, ii-r I>{ E ii~ :.
,.
- --_- -- ~ - ---
SUB3EC.i':
LA COSTA MASTER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY
.... ..
__I___.--__ -- . _.. ..
. Stat:emer!t of the -- Hatter --_-_____
In anticipation of a future requirement, La Costa Land Company has submitted a repc entitled "An Intensive Archaeological Reconnaissance of La Costa". The report deta the prehistory of the La Costa Area, describes the archaeological resources, and oli lines measures to either mitigate or preserve those resources.
Staff has reviewed the report and provided an independent summary and analysis at t front of the document. In addition, the report was sent to five archaeological rev agencies. 1977.
Exhibits:
The Planning Commission recommended acceptance of the report on January
. An Intensive Archaeologicbl Reconnaissance of La .Costa.
Recommendation:
resources in La Costa. The City recognizes that findings in this report are preliminary and may be modified as further information is revealed as part of the environmental review for individual projects.
any EIR prepared for the La Costa area.
described in this report or otherwise found, the City, in con-
discretionary permits within the area covered by this report, shall require the applicant to submit a research design prepav by a competent archaeologist outlining the scientific methods to be employed in investigating any identified archaeological resource. If an identified archaeological resource is to be preserved or requires no mitigation, the applicant shall subm- a letter from a competent archaeologist stating the reasons wt such a course of action is appropriate. The Planning Director shall review the proposed methods of mitigation and consult w- archaeological review agencies to ensure that the mitigation proposed is appropriate and scientifically defensible.
See page 2 for Council Action.
2) Staff is directed to incorporate the report as appropriate fo
3) In order to mitigate impacts to the archaeological resources
nection with the processing of environmental documents for an3
0 e b .. .1
ABnU4074
Council Act’on:
2-15-77 It was moved that the staff recamendations as outlined be accepted.
-