HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-04-05; City Council; 4053-1; APPLICANT: DOUGLASS SOUTHWEST CORPORATION~_l___^__l CITY GI ,ARt.SE!A3
---_ Initial : f
City ~tty ---_ C
City Pig.. -- 1
-__I Dept. tld.
2
- 0 - -_.__ 1---1-- _I_ --I-_I._ ~-
PLANNING - ---_ll_l_________I_-
a -.
%.
.I_ I-- -- I-- -I_.---- --~ ---__-__ SUBJLLT:
APPLICANT: DOUGLASS SOUTHWEST CORPORATION
CASE NO: SP-115(A), PUD-6, CT 76-15.
__1_-- -~---l__...._l_____ __________ -------__ 3 ~TA~€lKrl?I OC: 7lK --.--- MATT€R
REQUEST :
In December 1976, the Planning Commission recommended that CT 76-1 and PUD-6 be denied. However, the City Council referred the matte
back to the Planning Commission for review of the requested redesii
of the Tract Map. The Tract Map was substantially changed by reve
the lots on Tamarack, so they backed instead of fronted onto Tamar
In addition, a small area along Tamarack near Skyline has been del from the Tract Map.
Staff felt that this was a substantial change and therefore notice
new public hearing. Staff was satisfied with the modifications, a recommended approval. In recommending approval, however, a modifi to the existing SP-l15(A), also had to be made.
The Planning Commission agreed with staff and recommended approval
the deletion of the portion of SP-115(A), and the approval of the
Map, and the PUD as per staff recommendation.
Exhibits:
Planning Commission Resolution No's: 1337, 1335, 1336. Planning Commission Resolution No: 1307, 1309 Staff Report dated, March 9, 1977.
Staff Report dated, December 22,.1976
, Exhibits': E, F, G, H, I.,. dated February'22, 1977. T @LW/Lk '
, Location Map. - &#Y e&&
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Attorney be directed to prepare th
documents approving the deletion of a portion of SP-l15(A), and
approving CT 76-15 and PUD-6 as per Resolution Nos: 1337, 1335, 1
' Council Action:
4-5-77 The City Attorney was directed t'o prepare the documents nc to approve the deletion of a portion of SP-115 (A), and ai
of Tentative Map for Cf 76-15 and PUD-6 as per Planning Cc Resolution Nos. 1337, 1335 and 1336, subject to a new Spec Plan being submitted, readjustment of park fees on the Tei :-lap and that all water saving devi'ces be included in cons further, that a statement be included regarding sewer cap
not being guaranteed a2 the time the developer applies fol Building Permit.
FO!C4 ?lANN XNG 73
~ ,1
'
..a -.. r I:. e 9
7 2*
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
l4
15
.. 16
l7
18
I'
2o
21
22
. 23
24
25
' 26
27
28
9 3LANNING COMMISSIOE FCESOLUTION NO. 1337 #
A RESOLUTION OF THE'PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOM- MENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 115, DELETING CERTAIN
AND PUD-6, ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN
KELLY DRIVE AND CHESTNUT AVENUE. CASE NO. : SP-115 (A)
PRUPEK;GX TO BE FiREK9EPEP B4F CT 76-15
APPLICANT: DOUGLASS-SOUTHWEST CORPORATION
I WHEREAS, a verified application for deletion of certai
property from PUD-6 and CT 76-15, to wit: .
That portion of Lot "I" of RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, in
the City of CArlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 823,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Dieg
County, November 16, 1896, and also listed in
Assessor's Book No. 207, Page 200, Parcels 8 and 9
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the
Planning .Commission: and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as pro
by the "Carlsbad Municipal Code;" and
WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the subject
request was held on March 9, 1977, at the time and in the'
place specified in the public hearing notice, pu
the provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and'
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con:
the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who de:
to be heard, said Commission'considered all factors relatir
the Tentative Tract Map request (CT 76-15) and found the fc
facts and reasons to exist:
1) The subject application has complied with the requireme
of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of :
because :
*r - 2, -2.
- fr 'if
1
2'-
3
r
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
. 23
24
25
26
27
. 28
m T . 1''
a] The previous certification of EIR-129, combined wS1
the submission of supplemental information meets tl
Ordinance through'prior Compliance.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent wit1
the General Plan because: 2)
a) The hand Use Mp of thQ GQnmal Plan &bw$ &he sub3e 1 property as RM (Residential Medium Density, 4-10 d,
per acre). The proposed project is consistent wit1
that designation.
The proposed project conforms to applicable City policj and ordinances dealing with Public Facilities because:
a) At this time, all necessary public facilities, in- cluding sewer service, are available to serve the
subject project as proposed. However, sewer facilj
ties may not be available when applications are mac
for building permits. If sewer facilities are not
available at the time of building permit applicatic
building permits will not be issued until arrangeme
satisfactory to the City Council can be made to guc that all necessary sewer facilikies will be availak prior to occupancy.
3)
'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commissi
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B.)
.
That in view of the findings heretofore made and consic
the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commis
is to approve SP-l15(A), subject to the following condi
a) The approval for deletion of portions of SP-115 is
for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto, and as'shown on the plot plan
labeled Exhibit A, dated January 25, 1977.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of th
1977, City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on March 9,
khe following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Larson, Watson, Jose, Fikes and L'Heureux.
* NOES: Commissioner Nelson.
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Rombotis.
ABSENT : None. -
-2-
c
'I -.-
ir 'i(L
'2 ' IC.
3
.4
5
6
.7
8
9
e --
, 3' *
f
fLYh
ERIC LRRSON, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST :
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
I 1
-_ *r gI
. .(J ';{ 1
v V@ !
PLANNING COMI4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1336 . t' '
r'
r 23
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
IS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CON-
135 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DUELLINGS ON CERNING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR
43.99 ACRES ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN KELLY DRIVE AND CHESTNUT AVENUE. CASE NO.: PUD-6. APPLICANT: DOUGLASS-SOUTHWEST CORPORATION
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property
wit:
That portion of Lot "I" of RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Ca'lifornia, according to the Map thereof No. 823, fiie in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1896, and also listed in Assessor's Book No. 207, Page 200, Parcels 8 and 9
has been filedwith the City of Carlsbad and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a reque
provided.by Title 21 of the ".Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was held at the time and i
place specified in said notice on March 9, 1977; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con-
sidering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all person
desired to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planned Unit Development and found the foll
facts and reasons to exist:
1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessar desirable to provide a service or facility which will c tribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood a the community because:
a) The development will allow the subjtit. property to
developed to its allowable potential and density as provided in the General Plan. xxxxxxxxxx
-*
*I
. ;r ' IIf
1
' 2-
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
'26
27
.28
0 *
I' =
2) ThE use will not be detrimental to the health, safety Q general welfare of the.persons residing or working in t vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in th
vicinity because:
a) The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner simi to the anticipated development in the area.
b) The proposed PUD will provide a necessary link in t circulation system for the City (secondary arterial Tamarack) .
3) The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 and 4
minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.41 will be met because:
a) The plot plan and additional exhibits include all dl ment aspects required.
b) The plot plan and additional exhibits include adequ, provisions for open space, recreational facilities, circul ati on and parki ng .
c) The project will be developed in a manner to be com, with surrounding development.
d) Internal circulation is acceptable to the City Engi, as shown on the plot plan 'and by conditions of apprt
.
e) Private recreational facilities are readily accessit
f) Dwelling unit density does not exceed the density a'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commissic
. in the underlying zone (P-C with Master Plan).
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A)
B)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That in view of the findings heretofore made and considf
' the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commis! is to approve PUD-6, subject. to the following condition:
I) The approval is granted for the land described in th application and any attachments thereto, and as shoh plot plan submitted labeled Exhibit F, dated Februar
I, dated February 22, 1977; The location of all roa parking areas, landscaping and other facilities or f
H and I unless otherwise provided therein.
ject commenced within 18. months from final City acti
,1977, and additional exhibits labeled Exhibits G, H
- shall be located .substantially as shown on Exhibits
2) All conditions shall be appropriately completed and
-2-
.
I , lf -r*
. if */(
1
r 2"
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
33
14
15
16
3 7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a (1-
,* '
3) All lot dimensions, size and setbacks south of Tama
' Avenue (extended) as. shown on Exhibit F shall conf'c to the R-1 zone requirements.
4) All lot dimensions, size and setbacks shall general ly conform to the plot plan, Exhibit F, and the tyl
case shall the standards set forth in Title 21,
Section 21.45.720 (13, A, R and C) and Section 21.4 (2) be superseded.
5) Structures to be built in excess of three feet abo\ pad level shall maintain a minimum of three feet from any side lot lin'e and five feet from any rear lot line.
6) Building height shall not exceed thirty feet.
7) Lot coverage, including building and structures, si. not exceed forty percent of the lot.
8) A uniform fencing plan to provide fencing at the tc the slcpe for those lots containing slopes droppin! down to lower elevations shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director, pri-or to issuanc
9) Fencing shall be provided according to the approve( prior to occupancy for each affected residence.
10) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City Eng. shall approve a plan submitted by the applicant foi interim erosion control on all man-made slopes in excess of three feet within the boundaries of this subdivision. Prior to this issuance of grading pel the applicant shall post bonds and agreements ensuring the installation and maintenance of the erosion control system until permanent landscaping is installed and maintained.
11) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a permanent landscaping and irrigation plan to the Parks and Recreation Direct(
for his approval. The plan shall include all artit cia1 slopes. These slopes shall be landscaped by - following standards as set forth in the City Counc. Open Space Maintenance Policy No. 23, as follows:
a) Restored Native Vegetation:
1) Al! interior slopes; 2) These slopes will be maintained by the Homeowners' Association for a minimum of three years;
pepresentations chown on Elhibits R and I. In no
of final occupancy for residences in Unit NG, 1,
xxxxxxxxxx
-3-
.. ,' r
. 1r . L1c
1
2 I"
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
36
17
3.8
r
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
-28
0 q
I' '
3) At the end of three years, the Homeowners' Association may elect to return maintenance
owners. responsibilities to the individual lot
b)/ Supplemental Native Vegetation:
1) All slopes adjacent to Tamarack Avenue (ext 2) These slopes shall be maintalibed by Che Homeowners' Association.
c) Refined Vegetation:
1) All slopes adjacent to El Camino Real; 2) These slopes shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association.
d) Intensive Vegetation:
1) All park sites as designated on Exhibits F,
.
and I;
Homeowners' Association. 2) These areas shall be maintained by the
12) Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed on all lots identified in Condition No. 11 before any of those lots are occupied. If residential constr tion occurs in units, this condition shall be met a unit-by-unit basis with the exception of those lots with slopes.adjacent to Tamarack Avenue (exte and El Camino Real. Final landscaping and irrigat shall be completed on those slopes adjacent to Tamarack and El Camino Real prior to issuance of f occupancy f.or the first homes in Unit No. 1.
13) CC&R's for the project shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval prior to issuance. o
A final Recreational Vehicle Storage Area Plan sho fencing, stripping, paving specifications and acce shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director, Parks and Recreation Director and the City Engineer prior to 'issuance of building permit for Unit No. 1.
15) Recreational vehicle parking shall be provided and available to residents prior to the first final occupancy permits for Unit No. 1.
a) If the applicant does not wish to build the
.
building permits,
14)
permanent Recreational Vehicle Storage Lot as shown on Exhibits F and G prior to occupancy f Unit No. 1, a temporary facility may be estab-
Director, Parks and Recreation Director and
*
lished to the satisfaction of the Planning
-4-
I -8 r.
-I> a
.. . If It
1
* 2,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
26
17
18
39
20
21
22
.23 24
25
'26
' 27
28
e * L' 2
the City Engineer.
A plan for th4s temporary facility must be submitted to and approved by those mentioned in (a) above prior to occupancy of any residen in Unit No. 1.
16) The Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility shall be made available to only those homeowners within the PUD area.
17) A Final Parks Plan for all three, park areas (shown on Exhibits F, G and I) and approved by the Parks
ing permits on Unit No. 1.
18) On lots north of Tamarack Avenue, five-foot access easements shall be granted between property owners
maintenance.
<
b)
and Recreation Director prior to issuance of build
. adjacent to a zero-lot-line to allow for building
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of th
City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on March 9, 1977,
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners, Larson, Watson, Nelson, Jose,
NOES: None
Fikes and L'Heureux.
. ABSTAIN: Commissioner Rombotis.
ABSENT: None.'
1 L-2- - IC LARSON, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
&& AL S. PLENDER, SECRETARY
.
-5-
- II
v': $i
.. .'(x
2
: :I
r
3
-4
5
6
'7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
w v
$1
' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1335
d
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANiiING COMMISSIOi4 OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMEiiDING
135 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS Oi4
43.99 ACRES ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETMEEN KELLY DRIVE AND CHESTNUT AVENUE.
APPKOVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP REQUEST FOR
CASE NO.: CT 76-15 APPLICANT: DOUGLASS-SOUTHWEST CORPORATION
WHEREAS, a vQrifiQd application for a certain property
wit:
That portion of Lot "I" of RANCHO AGUA HEilIONDA, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 823, file in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
Assessor's book No. 207, Page 200, Parcels 8 and 9
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to th
Planning Commission; and
County, November 16, 1896, and also listed in
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as pro
by the "Carlsbad Municipal Code;" and
WHEREAS, the-public hearing to consider the subject re
was held on March 9, 1977, at the time and in the place spe
in the public hearing notice, pursuant to the provisions of
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and cons
the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who des
to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relatin
the Tentative Tract Map request (CT 76-15) and found the fo
facts and reasons to exist:
1) The subject application has complied with the requireme of the Carlsbac Environmental Protection .Act of 1972 .be
a) The previous certific-ation of EIR-129, combined wit
submission of supplemental information meets the or through Prior Compliance.
tll 11 3 !
-0 . If “1
. r 2;.
3
.4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
12
13
14
15
16
17.
18
19
20
21
22
. 23
24
‘25
26
27
28
a -9
2) ’The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with th General P1 an because:
a) The Land Use Element designates the subject site f Residential Medium Density (4-10 d.u.’s per acre). The subject project will provide approximately 3 d.u.’s per acre.
The design or improvement of the proposed subdivjsign
conslstent with the General Plan because;
a) The development of the proposed project will provic necessary link in the establishment of a portion 0’ Tamarack Avenue.
r
3)
b) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
4) The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with apt cable City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because:
a) At this time, all necessary public facilities, in- cluding sewer service, are available to serve the subject project as proposed. However, sewer faci- lities may not be available when applications are made for building 2ermits. If sewer facilities are not available at the time of building permit application, building permits will not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council can be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will be available prior to occupancy.
b) The Public Works Administrator has indicated that
the subject project has been placed in a Level 4 designation regarding potential availability of sewer capacity. Level 4 projects are those, that are reasonably assured sewer capacity, given the anticipated development time frame and sewer availability projections.
5) The site is physically suitable for this type of devel- opment because:
a) The currently requested project will require less . grading than previously approved projects for the s
b) Most of the site has been rough-graded.
c)
6) The site is physically suitable for the proposed densit:
No significant vegetation exists on the site.
of development because:
a) The currently requested project will result in fewe
b)
units than previously approved requests.
Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed th.e General Plan minimum. -2-
.I r,
t .. : cr . “1
‘r 2,)
3
-4,
5
6
.7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
39
20
21
22
23
24
’ 25
26
27
28XX
e -* !
’ 7) ‘The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvemer are not ’likely to cause substantial environmental damp! or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildli. or their habitat because:
a) An Environrnenthl Impact Report has been certified
b) Staff has been supplied with adequate supplemental
for previous approvals.
information to cover project changes.
8) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvemei are not likely to cause serious public health problems cause:
a) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
9) The design of the subdivision or the type of improveme will not conflict with easements required by the publi at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision because:
a) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
101 The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to
public waterways, rivprs, streams, lakes; reservoirs,
a) The subdivision does not front on any of the abovc
coastlines or shorelines because:
91) It is herein placed in the record that:
a) Attorneys were present representing the applicant an adjacent property owner stating that they wish( it made a part of the official record that they w- negotiate as to the impacts of the Tamarack Avenuc Extension traversing one-third of the neighboring property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commis!
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correcte
B) That in view of the findings heretofore made and consi the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commi is to approve CT 76-15, subject to the following condi
7) The approval is granted for the land described in application and any attachments thereto, and as sh on the plc’: plan submitted labeled Exhibit E, date.
February 22, 1977.
xx xx xxxx
-3-
7 J
! ../ . .
.. . It It 3
r 2,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
m **
2). Lots 116 and 117 shall include the remnant propertj adjacent t0 them unles's, prior to final ma approva
the adjacent property (shown as not-a-part Y can be incorporated into the subdivision to allow proper 1
Cbtif ;gurat 4 on *
1
3) Street names as shown-are not approved. Stree shall be submitted to the Planning Director for app pursuant to the Street Name Policy (City Council Policy No. 20) prior to approval of the final map.
In order to provide for reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shal maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings and adequate fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Depar
5) Ornamental street lighting shall be provided fo? as
deposit cash in the amount necessary to energize said street lights for an eighteen-month period after construction, to permit the incorporation of the subdivision into a maintenance district.
6) 'A71 land and/or easements required shall be granted to the City of Carlsbad without cost to the City, ai
- free of all liens and encumbrances. No easements SI be recorded prior to recordation of the final map
unless approved by the City Engineer.
7) The improvement and grading plans shall include a report of a geological investigation and a complete grading plan of the entire site, when required by ti City Engineer. The report and plan shall be prepari civil engineers licensed by the State of California, experienced in erosion control, who shall be accept- able to the City Engineer. They shall certify that they have investigated the site and prepared data with full consideration of the consequences to the included and neighboring properties and in conformance with the Geologic and Seismic Safety Element of the General Plan.
8) El Camino Real shall be dedicated and improved alons the subdivision frontage on the basis of a 126-foot street section, according to City of Carlsbad stand?
9) Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Unit No. 3 a forty-foot waterline easement centered on the existing fourteen-inch waterline crossing Unit No. 3 shall be granted to the City betweep .the proposed Tamarack Avenue and Skyview Drive.
4)
,required by Municipal Ordinance. The developer sha
.
xxxxxxxxxx
-4-
d I
l
1'
0. ;. I
.. . If It
1 2,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a a*
10) Slopes adjacent to public streets.shal1 be 2:l m'axi
11) The storm drain system is not specifically approved
gutters and other appurtenances shall be as approve on the improvement plan.
12) All contractors' and construction material supplier vehicles shall take all access from El Camino Real during the construction of the improvements related to this tentative map.
13) Proposed Palisades Drive, proposed Terrace Drive, between Palisades and Skyview, and proposed Skyvieh Drive, between Terrace Drive and Tamarack Avenue shall be dedicated and improved on the basis of a sixty-foot street section according to City of Carl standards.
14) The proposed three units shall be recorded and cons in sequentation order as shown on the tentative maF
15) Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the
<
as shown; designs of storm drains, ditches, cross-
.map for Unit No. 1: 1
a) Tamarack Avenue shall be dedicated and improver shall be secured within the subdivision boundar the basis of a modified 84-foot street section as approved on the amended Tentative Map, withi
b) Tamarack Avenue right-of-way and improvements s be secured to its intersection with Skyline Dri The right-of-way width, street section width ar general alignment of Tamarack Avenue in the vic of its intersection with Skyline Drive shall be as shown on Exhibit A, of City Council Resoluti No. 3856.
c) The applicant shall enter into a secured agree- ment to install a northbound left turn lane on El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue as approved by the City Engineer.
d) The applicant shall deposit funds for the striF ping of the left turn pocket required in c) abc and on Tamarack Avenue from El Camino Real to
Skyline Drive, as approved on the improvement I:
e) The applicant shall provide revised water systf calculations, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, for the entire three-uni't tentative
. map area. They shall be based on current desic criteria to be furnished by the City, and lines shall be sized according to fire flow requireme and hydrant locations appr'oved by the Fire Mar:
the subdivision boundary.
-5-
I 1
<. . ,'.' . , !
1
2 Q
.. : 1r I1
.<
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
' 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
39
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 a*
16) Prior to or concurrent with the re.cordation of the
final map for Unit No..2, the applicant shall:
a) Dedicate and improve El Camino Real per
f
Condition No. 8 above, along the subdivision .
frontage, based on approved -!mprovement plans
for El Carnino Real.
b) Dedicate a 15-inch wide sewer easement across Lot No. 93 from Palisades Circle to the northwe corner of the lot.
17) If the existing 14-inch waterline lies under or within 4 feet of the curb, gutter and sidewalk of Skyview Drive, as approved on the improvement plans for Unit No. 3, the applicant shall deposit funds and/or enter into a secured agreement to relocate the line to an alignment to conform with City of Carl sbad standards.
any loop system outside the unit boundary and inter appurtenances, such as blowoffs, as required by the
City Engineer, based on the Engineer's calculations 'required in Condition No. 15 (e) above, or suppleme thereto.
shall include a waiver of direct access rights from the lots shown on each final map as abutting t
20) Prior to recordation of the final map for Unit No. the applicant shall provide for the future abandonm of the sewer proposed to cross Lot No. 115 when construction of the offiste sewer connection in Skyview Drive occurs.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on March 9, 1977,
the following vote, to wit;
18) Waterline improvements for each unit shall include
19) Dedication of El Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue
AYES: Commissioners Larson, Watson, Nelson, Jose,.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Rombotis.
ABSENT : None: %
Fikes and L'Heureux.
XXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxx
-6-
8 2
I *. I .
-, ..I ..
1' r% . 6,
' 1'
'i( 2
3
4
5
6
.7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 -, *
t
L
F5 g-
ERIC LARSON, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
-7-
y: 1
f 2 L_
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
3-7
- 1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-26
27
28
': ch e e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1307
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING
DWELLINGS ON 43.99 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL
BETWEEN PARK DRIVE AND CHESTNUT AVENUE.
APPLICANT: DOUGLASS SOUTHWEST CORP.
1
CT 76-15 FOR 136 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
CASE NO. : CT 76-1 5
m. /,,,,I( I
WHEREAS, a verified applicztion for a certain property
wit:
That portion of Lot ''I" of RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA,
. in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of County Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1896
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to tt-
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified applicaxion constitutes a reque
provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was held at the time and i
. the place specified in said notice on December 8, 1976 and
tinued to December 22, 1976; and
WHEREAS,'at said public hearing, upon hearing and cons
the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who del
be heard, said Commission considered a71 factors relating
tentative tract map (CT 76-15) and found the following fac
reasons to exist:
7) The use will be detrimental to the health, safety or I
injurous to property or improvements in the vicinity I
a) If parking occ*urs on the south side of the propo frontage road, trash pick-up emergency vehicle a and mail service would be substantially impaired
welfare of the persons residing or workinq in the vic
.
"1
y:- '
' 2,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0.
2)
"
'The Planned Unit Development (PUD-6) .was denied on Dec
22, 1976 and CT 76-15 does not conform to the Conditicr approved SP-115 (City Council Resolution No. 3177, dat August 7, 1973).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commiss
- .
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A)
B)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That a tentative tract map (CT 76-15) is denied to all
136 single-family detached dwellings on 43.99 acres on property located west of El Camino Real between Park D Chestnut Avenue.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of t
City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on December 22, 1
the following vote to wit:
'
AYES: . Commissioners L'Heureux, Fikes, Nelson, Larsr
NOES: Commissioner Watson.
ABSTAI :4 ! Commi s si oner Romboti s .
ABSENT: None.
Jose.
STEPHEN M. L'HEUREUX, CHAIRMAI
ATTEST:
BUD PLENDER, SECRETARY
.
1
3
L. , *-..
-a I -6 I .. : I, 11
., 1
2
-8
5
4
-6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
' 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- e
t
I - PLANNING COMMISSION, RESOLUTION NO. 1309 1
1
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING
A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR 136
CHESTNUT AVENUE.
SIMGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS ON 43.99 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALFY LOCATED NEST OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN PARK DRIVE AND
CASE NO.: PUD-6 APPLICANT: DOUGLASS SOUTHWEST CORP.
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property
wit:
That portion of Lot "1" of RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 523, filed in the office of County Recorder of San Diego
d County, November 16, 1896
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to th
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a requc
provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"; and
\!HEREAS, the public hearing was held at.the time and
the place specified in said notice on December 8, 1976 and
tinued to December 22, 1976; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con
the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who de
be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating
Planned Unit Development Permit and found the following fa
reasons to exist:
1) The use will be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of tt-e persons residinq or working in the vic injurous to property or improvements in the vicinity
a) The lack of a sidewalk and the "frontage road" ( on the northerly side of Tamarack will cause PO pedestrian-bicycle-motor vehicle conflicts whic become an unnecessary liability problem to the
'C - ' I, 9
.. . .< *I
1
'i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
-18
19
20
21
22
23
x4
25
26
27
28
c e I-
b) The "frontaqe road" area which will have a 10% gr,a
I may tend to become a play area, further increasinc the number of potential conflicts within the front road area and the secondary arterial (Tamarack AV.E and
c) If parking occurs on the south side of the proposi frontage road, trash pick-up emergency vehicle acc
and mail service would be substantially impaired.
2) The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 and minimum development standards set forth in Section 21. will not be met because:
a) The plot plan and additional exhibits do not incl adequate provision for open 'space recreational fa ties, circulation and quest parkinq because: .
. 1) The required guest parkinq is not adequate o the north side of Tamarack (1 space is not available for each dwelling unit);
. 2) The proposed recreation vehicle storage are: not an adequate shape to accommodate workab- internal circulation and parking for large vehicles;
3) The proposed recreational vehicle storage a- in a location that could not be adequately and/or isolated from surrounding residences
4) Required usable open space area is not prov at a ratio of 600 square feet per dwelling
NOW. THEREFORE. RE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commis
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That a Planned Unit Development Permits is denied to 136 single-family detached dwellings on 43.99 acres c generally located west of El Camino Real between Park and Chestnut Avenue.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
City of Carlsbad Plannin'g Commission held on December 22,
the following vote to wit:
AYES: . Commissioners L'Heureux, Fikes, Nelson, La
NOES : Commissioner Matson. .
and Jose.
1 -2-
- .'
I. *I
t
. .* * ,'a
1
[zi
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
'. 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
- 23
-24
25
, 26
-27
.20
- e
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Rombotis. c
ABSENT: None.
,qL;{y STEPH N M. L' EUR <X, CHI
ATTEST:
9&?h
BU'DmDER, SECRETARY
.
.
..
a
-3-
.d m ‘1) .I >I
*> MEMORANDUM .. I* ‘I
I”
I
1 Marsh 9, 1977
PLANNING COMMISSION TO i
FROM: P LANN I NG DEPARTMENT
CASE NO: SP 115 (A), CT 76-15, PUD-6
APPLICANT: DOUGLASS SOUTHWEST CORPORATION
REQUEST : Amendment of Specific Plan 115 and approval
of CT 76-15 and PUD-6, to allow 135 single- family detached dwellings on 43.99 acres.
Planning Commission and staff by the City Counc for further study and report. The applicant ar
. staff have worked to resolve problems as noted
in previous reports and hearings. This report reflects the applicants and staff efforts. Thc applicant is requesting portions of SP-115 be deleted to be replaced by PUD.
SUBJECT : CT 76-15 and PUD-6 have been returned to the
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that SP-115(A), CT 76-15 and PUD-6 be APPROVE’ based on the following findings and subject to the following cl di tions :
SP-l15(A) FINDINGS ,
1) The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with th General Plan because:
a) The Land Use Map of the General Plan shows the subject property as RM (Residential Medium Density 4-10 du. pe acre). The proposed project is consistent with that designation.
2) The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with ’ch
of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 bec
a) The previous certification of EIR-129 combined with th submission of supplemental information meets the ordin through Prior Compliance.
3) The proposed project conforms to applicable City policies
ordinances dealing with .public facilities because:
a) Availability of public f‘acilities have been assured b; the appropri ate agencies.
-1-
a ,a w mi. 'I .. .. I. , ,k + ..
.I SP-llE;(A) CONDITIONS I
I. ' 1) 'The approval for deletion of portions of SP-115 is granted the land described in the application and any attachments t and as shown on the plot plan labeled Exhibit A, dated Janu
2g, 1977.
76-15 FINDINGS
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan becaus
a) The Land Use Plan designates the subject site for Resid Medium Density (4-10 du. per acre)., The subject projec will provide approximately 3 du. per acre.
The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is co sistent with the General Plan because: 2)
. a) The*development of the proposed project. will provide a
essary link in the establishment of a portion of Tamara Avenue.
b) Conditions of approval will insure xne above.
3) The site is physically suitable for the type of development because:
a) The currently requested project will require less gradi
b) Most of the site has been rough graded.
c) No significant vegetation exists on the site.
4) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density 01 development because:
a) The currently requested project will result in fewer UI
'b) Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the Genc
5) The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements ( likely to cause substantial environmental damage substanti( and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat bl
a) An Environmental Impact Report has been certified for
b)
than previously approved projects for the site.
than previously approved requests.
Plan minimum.
approvals.
Staff has been supplied with adequate sLjpplemental inf to cover project changes.
-2-
.I 1 m m. 3.
. I. -1.6) *The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements z not 1 i kely to cause serious pub1 ic health' problems becausev:
* a) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements '1 not conflict with easements required by the public at largt for access through or use of property within the proposed : division because:
a) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
waterways , rivers , streams , 1 akes , reservoi rs , coast1 i nes,
8) The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to pub'.
shorelines because:
a) The subdivision does not front on-any of the above.
CT 76-15 CONDITIONS:
1) ' The approval is granted for the land described in the appli and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the plot plan mitted labeled Exhibit E, dated February 22, 1977.
Lots 116 .and 117 shall include the remnant property adjacent to them unless, prior to final map approval, the adjacent property (s5own as not-a-part) can be incorporated in the subdivision to allow proper lot conf igurati on.
3) Street names as shown are not approved. Street names shall be submittec the Planning Director for approval pursuant to the street narce policy (City Council Policy No. 20) prior to approval of the final map.
4) In order to provide for reasonable fire protection during the constructi period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings and adequate fire hydrar;ts with required fire flows shall be i stalled as recommended by the Fire Department.
Ornamental street lighting shall be provided for as required by Municipi Ordinance. energize said street lights for an eighteen month period after construcl to permit the incorporation of the subdivision into a maintenance distr-
All land and/or easements required shall be granted to the City of Carl: without cost to the City, and free of all liens and encumbrances. No ei
ments shall be recorded prior to recordation of the final map unless app
by the City Engineer.
The improvement and grading plans shall include a report of a geological
investigation and a complete grading plan of the entire site, when requi
by the City Engineer. The report and plan shall be prepared by civil
engineers licensed by the State of California, and evperienced in erosic control, who shall be acceptable to the City Engineer. They shall certi
that they have investigated the site and prepared data-with full conside tion of the consequences to the included and neighboring properties and conformance with the Geologic and Seismic Safety Element of the General
2)
5) The developer shall depost cash in the amount necessary to
6)
7)
-3-
- e*
1. ,. I* '
8) El Camino Real shall be dedicated and improved along the subdivision l frontage on thQ basis of a 126 foot street section, according to City
A of Carlsbad Standards.
9) Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Unit 3, a 40 foot water line easement centered on the existing 14" water line crossing Unit3 shall be granted to the City between the proposed Tamarack Avenue and Skyvie Drive.
10) Slopes adjacent to public streets shall be 2:l maximum.
11) The storm drain system is not specifically approved as shown; designs of storm drains, ditches, crossgutters and other appurtenances shall be as approved on the improvement plans.'
12) All contractors' and construction material suppliers' vehicles shall t all access from El Camino Real during the construction of the improvem related to this tentative map.
Proposed Pal isades Drive, proposed Terrace Drive , between Pal i sades an Skyview, and proposed Skyview Drive, between Terrace Drive and Tamarac Avenue shall be dedicated and improved on the basis of a 60 foot stree section according to City of Carlsbad Standards.
14) The proposed three units shall be recorded and constructed in sequenta order as shown on the tentative map.
15) Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the final map for Un-it
a)
13)
Tamarack Avenue shall be dedicated and improvements shall be secur within the subdivision boundary on the basis of a modified 84 foot street section as approved on the amended Tentative Map, within th subdivision boundary.
Tamarack Avenue right of way and improvements shall be secured to
intersection with Skyline Drive. The right of way width, street section width and general alignment of Tamarack Avenue in the vici
of its intersection with Skyline Drive shall be as shown on Exhibi "A", of City Council Resolution No: 3856.
The applicant shall enter into a secured agreement to install a nc
bound left turn lane on El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue as apprc by the City Engineer;
d) The applicant shall deposit funds for the stripping of the left ti pocket required in c. above) and in Tamarack Avenue from El Caminc to Skyline Drive, as approved on the improvement plans.
The applicant shall provide revised water system calculations, prc by a Registered Civil Engineer, for the entire 3-Unit tentative mt They shall be based on current design criteria '3 be furnished by and lines shall be sized according to fire flow requirements and 1 locations approved by the Fire Marshall;
Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the'final map for Unit
.
b)
c)
, ,? cb
e)
.
16)
' the applicant shall:
-4-
.. .e -8
. 1. ,I I e
a) Dedicate and improve El Camino Real per Condition No. 19 above, , along the SUbdivision frontaye,, based on approved improvement plans
for El Camino Real.
b) Dedicate a 15' wide sewer easement across lot 93 from Palisades Cirl to the northwest corner of the lot.
If the existing 14 inch waterline lies under or within 4' of the curb, gutter and sidewalk of Skyview Drive, as approved on the improvement pl
for Unit No. 3, the applicant shall deposit funds and/or enter into a s agreement to relocate the 'line to an alignment to conform with City of Carlsbad Standards.
Waterline improvements for each uni't shall include any loop system outs
the unit boundary and interim appurtenances, such as blowoffs, as requ' by the City Engineer, based on the engineer's calculations required in Condition 15 (e) above, or supplements thereto.
Dedication of El Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue shall include a waive of direct access rights from the lots shown on each final map as abutt
thereon.
Prior to recordation of the final map for Unit No. 3, the applicant sh
provide for the future abandonment of the sewer proposed to cross lot when construction of the offsit.. sewer connection in Skyview Drive oc
17)
18)
19)
20)
~
- 5-
0 m -1
1 PUD-6 FINDINGS: e' I. I.
1
1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary an 'desirable to provide a service or facility which will contr to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the commu because:
a) The development will allow the subject property to be d veloped to its allowable potential and density as provi in the General Plan.
2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or ge welfare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity becau
a) The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner similar the anticipated development in the area.
b) The proposed PUD will provide a necessary link in the ( culation system for the City (secondary arterial , Tamar
The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 and all minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.02 will be met because:
a) The plot plan and additional exhibits inc1c;de all devel
b) The plot plan and additional exhibits include adequate
3)
aspects required..
visions for open space, recreational facilities, circu' and parking.
c) The project wili be developed in a manner to be compat. with surrounding development.
d) Internal circulation is acceptable to the City Engineei shown on the plot plan and by conditions of. approval..
e) Private recreational facilities are readily accessible
f) Dwelling unit ,density does not exceed the density alloi
-
in the underlying zone (P-C with Master Plan).
PUD-6 CONDITIONS:
'1) The approval is granted for the land described in the appl and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the plot plan mitted labeled Exhibit F, dated February 22, 1977, and add exhibits labeled Exhibit G, H and I, dated February 22, 19 The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping a
other facilities or features shall be located substantial1 shown on Exhibit F,G,H a'nd I unless otherwise provided the
- 6-
.' .* ,2) All conditio e shall be appropriately c @ plete'ci and the pro .. I= kommenced within 18 months from final City action.
i*
*%
3) All lot demensions, size and setbacks south of Tamarack Av; (extended) as shown on Exhibit F shall conform to the R-1 z
4) All lot demensions, size and setbacks shall generally.confo to the plot plan, Exhibit F and the typical representations shown on Exhibit B and I. In no case shall the standards s forth in Title 21, Section 21;45.120 No. 13, A,B,C and 21.4
No. 2 be superceeded.
Structures to be built in excess of three feet above pad le shall maintain a minimum of 3 feet from any side lot line a 5 feet from any rear lot line.
' requi rements.
5)
6, -Building height sha?l not exceed 30 feet.
7) Lot coverage, including building and structures shall nbt exceed 40% of the lot.
8) A uniform fencing plan to provide fencing at the top of sl for those lots containing slopes dropping down t:, lower ele shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director to issuance of final occupancy for residences in Unit 1.
9) Fencing shall be provided according to the approved plan P
10) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City Engineer shz
control on all man-made slopes in excess of 3 feet within 1 boundaries of this subdivision. Prior to this issuznce of permits, the applicant shall post bonds and agreements ens( the installation and maintenance of the erosion control sy!
11) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicar shall submit a permanent landscaping and irrigation plan tc Parks and Recreation Director for his approval. The plan L include all artificial slopes. These slopes shall be lands by the following standards as set forth in the City Council Open Space Maintenance Policy No. 23.
a) Restored Native Vegetation.
1) All interior slopes 2) These slopes will be maintained by the Homeowner's
3) At the end of 3 years the Homeowner's Association
to occupancy for each affected residence.
approve a plan submitted by the applicant for interim er9si
. until permanent landscaping is installed and maintained.
Association for a niinimum of: 3 years.
may elect to return maintenance responsi bi 1 i ties tc the individual lot owners.
b) Supplemental Native Vegetation.
1) All slopes adjacent to Tamarack Avenue (extended). 2) These slopes shall be maintained by Homeowner's
-7-
Association.
0. e* I. .*
. I. - ;> 1 <
1 c) Refined Vegetation
1) All slopes adjacent to El Camino Real. 2) These slopes shall be maintained by Homeowner's As!
d) Intensive Vegetation
1) All parks sites as designated on Exhibit F,G,I. 2) These areas shall be maintained by Homeowner's Asso
12) Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed on all lots in Condition llbefore any of those lots are occupied. If idential construction occurs in units,'this condition shal .. met on a unit-by-unit-basis with the exception of those lo slopes adjacent to Tamarack Avenue (extended) and ECR. Fi landscaping and irrigation shall be completed on those. slo adjacent to Tamarack and El Camino Real prior to issuance final -occupancy for the first homes in unit 1.
13) CC&R's for the project shall be submitted to the Planning for approval prior to issuance of building permits.
stripping, paving specifications and access shall t.e submi to and approved by the Planning Director, Parks and Recrec Director and City Engineer prior to issuance of building F for the Unit 1.
15) Recreat4onal vehicle parking shall be provided and availat to residents prior to the first final occupancy permits fc Unit 1.
a) If the applicant does not wish to build the permanent
14) A final Recreation Vehicle Storage Area Plan showing fenc
Storage lot as shown on Exhibit F and G prior to occur for Unit 1, a temporary facility may be established tc the satisfaction of the Planning Director, Parks and 1 reation Director and City Engineer.
b) A plan for this temporary facility must be submitted'l
- and approved by those mentioned in (a) above prior to occupancy of any residence in Unit 1,
16) The Recreational Vehicle Storage facility shall be made a\ to only those homeowners within the PUD area.
17) A Final Parks plan for all 3 park areas (shown in Exhibit and approved by the Parks and Recreation Director prior tc issuance of building permits on Unit 1.
18) On lots north of Tamarack Avenue, 5 foot a.:cess easements be granted be,tween property owners adjacent to a zero lot t'o allow for building maintenance.
-8-
.. .* 1) -8 .. P) . I. , 1
BACKGROUND : I
The Planning Commission denied CT 76-15 and PUD-6 (Planning Com Resolution 1307)on December 22, 1976. .
The basic concern of the Commission was the Tamarack frontage r
concept, as presented by the applicant. A number of potential lems stemming from the frontage road design was presented in th staff report dated December 22, 1976.
. The staff report also pointed out certain deficiencies in RV pa usable open space and guest parking along Tamarack. However, i noted in the report that these problems could be worked out as ftinction of minor project redesign.
At the City Council meeting of January 18, 1977, the City Counc noted four distinct problems, the primary one being the potenti
conflicts resulting from the frontage road. They sent the prob back to the Planning Commission, staff and the applicant to wor they were:
1) Frontage road design problems.
I
a) Pedestrian, motor vehi.:l e, bi cycl e conf 1 i cts.
b) No separation of frontage road and secondary arterial. c) Sight distances on frontage road and secondary arterial
e) Service vehicle conflicts on frontage road. f) Driveways onto secondary arterial.
., d) Parking conflicts on frontage road.
2) Recreational Vehicle Storage area (adequacy under PUD requi
3) Location-size-adequacy of usable open-space (adequacy under
4) Open Space Maintenance.
Because of the many questions and concerns resulting from the ' road concept, the applicant has redesigned the subdivision and eliminated the frontage road completely. Staff feels that the subdivision design is a much more workable one than the previoi posal s.
The elimination of the frontage road solves the majority of th blems raised at the staff, Planning Commission and City Counci ,No residences will front on the secondary arterial (Tamarack). land on the north side of Tamarack will slope down to residenc The land on the south of Tamarack will slope up to residences. applicant lost2 lots (136 to 134) from the previous subdiv design.
The Recreational Vehicle Storage area has been redesigned and
cated (See Exhibit G). The area has been combined with a recr
area using a common access. The RU area is in a location that
physically and visually separated from residences and public s
requirements).
e e .*
I
. I* -:Staf,'f feels this is a good location for the combined RV storage recreation area. Required RV Storage area under the PUD ordina is 5400 sq. ft. The proposed RV Storage area is approximately . sqyare feet, excluding access -road.
The applicant has worked with the Planning Department and the F and Recreation Director on location, size and adequacy of usabl space for the project. The applicant, as a result, has redesic the project to show three recreational areas (See Exhibits, F,E These recreational areas are located to,serve three distinct ar
the subdivision.
The required size for all usable recreational facilities under
subject request is therefore required 81000 square feet or 1.8t
acres of recreation area. The proposed net square footage for three park areas.is 77,600 square feet or 1.78 acres (See CT E) E). The PUD ordinance allows up to 50% credit towards the usat open space requirement for scenic natural facilities, vistas, c Staff.feels that the usuable open space area, as proposed, is i to meet the needs of the future residents. Staff also feels tt credit for the additional 3400 square feet (4% of 1.86 acres) ( given for the potential scenic value that will be created by' tt creation of Tamarack Avenue. Views to eastbound travel on Tam; will be unimpared with the absence of houses fronting on the nc side of the street.
City Council Policy #23 (open space maintenance) establishes ci for various levels of landscaping and. maintenance. Staff and . applicant have discussed the various categories in Policy #23 i come to an agreement regarding which areas in the subdivision I fall under the various categories.
The applicant has indicated that a Homeowner's Association wil' created, and that they will be responsible for maintenance. HI
if at some future date the Homeowner's Association wishes to wc with the City in creating an Open Space Maintenance District, . existing landscaping will have been installed under categories lished by the City (See PUD Condition No. 8).
requirements is 600 square feet of space for 'each residence.
.
Additional Questions Raised at City Council
Master Plan Consistency
The existing Master Plan shows areas of specific density. The .range from 7.7 du. per acre to 2.5 du. per acre with an overal density of 5.9 du. per acre. Staff feels that because the ove density of the proposal has been lowered significantly (to 3 d acre) that the specific areas designated for specific densitie
not be strictly adhered to.
'Connection of Neblina Drive.
A local property owner expressed. concern over the ultimate tra connection of Neblina Drive to Tamarack. Avenue.
-10-
8 -I
L
I*
1. *‘Nebkina Drive is a collector street, and therefor*e, is planned carry surface traffic from residential areas to higher volume 5s The ultimate development of the connection will result in more
The previously approved Specific Plan (SP-115) and Tract Map (( show Neblina Drive to ultimately link up to a street connectin5 with Tamarack. The current map does not modify previously appv
plans in this regard.
Panhandle Lots
The previous request for subdivision icluded some panhandle lo1
The current request does not include panh-andle lots.
Lot Width, distance between buildings, usable PUD area
The redesigned subdivision and PUD use the zero-lot-line concek incorporate lots with rather limited street frontage, (one reas for use of-zero-lot-line design), some with 44 feet at the strc The average width at the street for lots north of Tamarack is about 50 feet.
The PUD ordinance requires the following setbacks under 21.45.1
A) The distance between any building used for human habitation any other building shall not be less than 10 feet.
B) Distance between any uninhabited buildings or structures SI be not less than 5 feet.
C) The distance between wings or courts of a building shall nc less than 10 feet.
Conditions of approval will insure the,se standards (SEE PUD Condi
The lot size and actual buildable pad size may be substantiall; different because of the presence of rough topography. For exi lot #78 on Tract Map, Exhibit E, is about 9000 square feet, hoc! the actual building pad size is about 3500 square feet. Lot Nc Exhibit E is about 12,400 square feet, however, the actual pad
is about 5600 square feet. This limited flat area limits the z of usable lot area. A policy determination has not been made z the requirement of usable lot area in relation to actual lot si This situation occurs, however, in other areas of the City wit1
slopes or rough topography.
The Building Department has indicated the following standards f lot line construction. Staff assumes the developer is aware 01 Uniform Building Code requirements:
1) One hour wall is required when a structure i-s.placed less 1
3 feet from property line.
’ efficient traffic flows in the area.
-11-
f' a *. . ' ,* a. <
2)
To avoid these requirements the developer may wish to maintain ? foot setback from the affected property lirie.
View blockage problem
At the City Council hearing, a local property owner expressed c[
mined that the hill in question is not on the subject property, cannot be considered with this subject request.
PUD Development Standards
Staff has reviewed all requirements under 'Section 21.45.120 (De! ment standards) and has found that by design or conditions o.f ai all of the requirements have been adequately met.
Most requirements have been discussed in the preceeding discuss Guest parking spaces will be supplied on-street, at one-guest- .
areas and found parking availability adequatc.. Guest spaces ar provided off' a private drive for 6 units, see CT Exhibit E, lot no. 70. Sidewalks will be provided on all public street:, to Ci standards.
No openings are permitted in walls closer than 3 feet from' .property line.
ahauk a mall hill in the area blocking his view. Staff has del
per-unit ratio, .Staff has analyzed street parking in cul-de-sa
TH:ar
( 3/ 4/7 7 )
Attachments:
Exhibit E, dated 2/22/77 Exhibit F, dated 2/22/77 Exhibit G, dated 2/22/77 Exhibit H, dated 2/22/777 Exhibit I, dated 2/22/77
Memorandum to City Manager, dated 1,'10/77 Planning Comnission Resolution no. 1307 Staff Report, dated 12/22/76 t(. ".
.u
-12-
-0 -
STAFF REPORT 0 I-, - ..
c a. '.
..
I I* .* t (
December 22, 1976
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION *
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE NO: CT 76-15; PUD-6
. APPLICANT: DOUGLASS SOUTHWEST CORP. .
/
REQUEST: Deletion of Specific Plan ll& (C.C. Resolutic . 83177, August 7, 1973) and approval of CT 76- . and PUD-6 to allow 136 sinqle,-family detacheo dwellinqs on 43.99 acres.
SECT108 I. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that CT 76-15/PUD-6 be DENIED based on the fo findings:
1) The use will be detrixental to the health, safety or gener fare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity or to property Gr improvements in the vicinity because:
a>
--
The lack of a sidewalk and the "frontage road" design northerly side of Tamarack wjll cause potential pedest bicycle -motor vehicle conflicts which will become an
essary liability problems to the city.
The "frontage .road" area which will have a 10% grade m
tentiaf conflicts within the frontage road area and th
If parking occurs on the south side of the proposed f'c
would be substantially impared.
b) . to bccofle a play area, further increasing the nuniber o
.ondary arterial (Tamarack Avenue).
c)
' road, trash pick-up emerqency vehicle access and mail
The design criteria set forth,in Section 21.45.110 and all
' development standards set forth in Section 21.45.120 will .
met because:
a) The plot plan and addi'tonal exhibits do not include ad1 provision for open space recreational facilities, circi
1) The rcquir.?d guest parking is not adequate on the side of Tamarack (1 space is not available for eacl dwelling unit).
2)
.-
I
. anciguest - parking because:
*-1- ..
.!. 1, 0 0 *,
,2) The proposed recreation vehicle storage area is nc
1 I' .- \I 1 an adequate shape to accornmodate.workab1e interna
circulation and parking for large vehicles.
a location that could not be adequately screened c or isolated from surroundinq residences.
4) Required usable open space area is not provided al ration of 600 square feet per dwellinq unit,
3) The proposed recreational vehicle storage area is
If the Planning Commission wishes to make findings of approva'
recommends the following conditions:
1) Specific Plan (C.C. Reso., #3177, dated August 7, 1373) 1s
2) The approval is granted for the land described in the appl and any attachments thereto. Conceptual and qeneraf desic of the Plot Plan submitted labeled Exhibit C, dated Octobc 1976 are hereby approved.
3) A revised plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director Engineer, Public Works Administrate?, 2nd Fire Marshall pr final approval. The revised Tentative Map will include ch
that re'flect the conditipns herein. This map shall show s and the easement for a future sewer to Holly Bra1 Estates.
4) The "Frontage road" on the north side of Tamarack Avenue w redesigned to minimize potential pedestrian, -bicycle, moto
deleted.
~t-19
&J Ps,
v? hh9
bicycle conflicts to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
Public CJorks Administrator.
. 5) A study shcwing the street design geornetrics pad elevation
building locations adjacent to and on lots 19 & 20, 21, 22 shall be submitted to the City Engineer and Public Works A istralor in conjuction with condition 4.
6) The "frontage road" on the north side of Tamarack shall be designed lo provide 1 guest parkins space per dwelling uni- required by the PUD ordinance.
7) A recreational veh,icle storage area that is adequate in si; shape and location shall be provided to the satisfaction 0- PI anni ng Director.
8) Usable open space shall be provided pursuant to requirement PUD ordinance based on a 600 square feet to 1 du. ratio to Satisfaction of the Planning Director and the Parks and Rec
9) A revised Planne! Unit Development Map and nec.essary additi
I exhibits as required by the PUD ordinance shall be subniitte approval by the City staff prior to issuance of grading per
10) Prior to the issuance of grading permi.ts, the City Engineer
approve a plan submitted by the applicant for interim erosi
trol on all man-made slopes in excess of five-feet created
-
----
* Director.
0 9 r .f I 3.
I.
,. subdivision. Prior to this issuance 0' grading permits, 1
: '* s ,+.' ,applicant shall post bonds and ayreements cnsuri ng the i ni ation and maintenance of the erosion control system until manerit landscaping is installed and .maintained.
'11)' Prior to the'issuance of any building permits, the applici
tubmi+ a permarlent landscaping and ;rr;gat;on plan to. the
and Recreation Director for his approval. The plan shall all artificial slopes. These slopes shall:
a) Utifize fire-retardent, drough-.resistant landscaping \ includes trees a.nd shrubs which reach a variety of si,
Utilize an irr.igation system appropriate for common ml of the required landscaping in conformance with condi 12, 13, 14.
. maturity;
b)
. 12) Permanent landscaping and irrigation shall be in.stal1ed O'i ident'ified in Condition 11 before any of those lots are o(
If residential construction occurs in units, this conditic be me on .a unit-byunit basis.
13) Prior to approval of a final subdivision map for any port- Specific Plan area, the applicant shall file with the Clci the C.ity of Carlsbad a petition for the formation of (711 01
Ma-intenatice District, as provided for in Section 50590 of
California State Government C.ode, to provide inaintcnaiice ( areas described in Condition 1'1.. Tile. applicant shall rfiair
these meas and a1 1 landscaping i ustall ed i ii conformance \
ConditSons 11 and 12 unti.1 .such time, as an Open Space Mair District is established and accepts maintenance responsib- as prescribed in the Open Space Maintenance Act, or until tenancc responsi bi 1 i ty .is acce.ptcd by another enti! ty accei
... '3.4) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the provision ( nianent open space maintenance shall be assu\-ed' to the sa't- of the City Manager. The. provision of permanent open spa( tenance sha.11 include, if- possible; maintenance of man--mad occurring on the s.choo~l site. X? the City Couc-il has not
reason formed an Open Space ilfaintenance District as peti ti the appl icant in coiifortiiance wi th Condj ti on 13 the appl i ca
. form a Homeowners.' Association fo perform inaintenance by. a
. --...-. entity acc.eptablc to the City blanager.
tC & R's for the project wiII be submitted to the PIanninc for approval prior to issuance of building permits.
In order to provide for reasonable fire protection during
. to the City.
*.
..
. .. ..
'
. ..
15) . constr.uction period, the subdivider shall niaintain pnssabl
.' idular access to dl1 bui'ltiings and adequacc .fire hydrants.
' requrcd fire flows shall be installed as recommended by ti.
' Department. .. ..
.\; '. I .
i
' '!' ,
. .. ,. .. .. 8
-3- ,' '
* m
% ,* .P 16) 'Ornamental street lighting shall be provided for as requir Municipal Ordinance. The developer shall deposit cash in
* .. amount necessary to energ.ize said street lights for an eij
month period after construction, to permi$ the incorporat. the subdivision into a maintenance district.
17) All land and/or easements required shall be granted to the of Carlsbad without cost to the City, and free of all lie1 encumbrances, No easements shall be recorded prior to re(
of the fianl map unless approved by the City Engineer.
18) The improvement and grading plans shall include a report (
geological investigation and a complete qrading plan of ti site, when required by the City Enqineer. The report and
shall be prepared by civil engineers licensed by the Stat1 California, 'and experienced in erosion control, who shall acceptable to the City Engineer. They shall certify that have investigated the site and prepared data with full COI tion of the consequences to the included and neighboring ties and in conformance with the Geologic and Seismic Saf Element of the General Plan.
. 19) El Camino Real shall be dedicated and improved along the
frontage on the basis of a 126 foot street section, accor C! ty of Carl sbad Standards.
. 20) Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Unit 6, a 40 fo water line easement centered on the existing 14" water li
crossing Unit 6 shall be granted to the City between the Tamarack Avenue and Terrace Court street easements.
21) Slopes adjacent to'public streets shall be 2:l maximum,
22). The storm drain system is not specifically approved as sh designs of storm drains, ditches, crossgutters and other appurteuances shall be as approved on the improvement pla
23) All contractors' and construction material suppliers' veh take all access from El Camino Real during the constructi improvements related to this tentative map.
Proposed Palisades Drive shall be dedicated and improved basis of a 60 foot street section accordinq to City of Ca Standards.
quested order shown on the tentative map.
Unit No. I:
24)
-
--.
25) The proposed six units shall be recorded and constructed
26) . Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the final
, a) Tamarack Avenue shall be dedicated and improvements s secured within the subdjvision boundary on the basis modified 84 foot street section as approved on the am Tentative Map, within the subdivision boundary.
-4-
a 0' ..
1 .I
I' 5'- ' b) Tamarack Avenue right of. way and improvements shall bi to its intersection with Skyline Drive. The right of
width, street section width and general alignment of ' Avenue in the vicinity of its intersection with Skyli shall be as shown on Exhibit "A", of City Council Res No: 3856.
c) The applicant shall enter into a secured agreement to a northbound left turn lane on El Camino Real at Tama
..
as approved by'tbe Cjty €!ngineer; I I
d) The applicant shall deposit funds for the striping of turn pocket required in c. above) and in Tamarack Ave El Camino Real to Skyline Drive, as approved on the i ment plans.
e) The applicant shall provide for temporary turn around ends of proposed Palisades Drive and a 15' wide all-w
. r-oad emergency access to connect them.
f) The applicant shall provide revised water system calc prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, for the enti tentaive map area. They shall be based on corrent de criteria to be furnished by the City, and lines shall according to $ire flow requirements and hydraqt locat approved by the Fire Marshall;
g) The applicant shall dedicate and enter into a secured ment to improve El Camino Real per Condition No. 19 a along the Unit 1 frontage, based on approved improvem plans for El Camino Real along the entire subdivision
27) Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the final
. Unit No. 2, the applicant shall:
3.) Dedicate and improve El Camino Real per Condition No. along the Unit 2 frontage, based on approved improveni
for El Camino Real along the entire subdivision front
b) Provide for a ternporar,y turn-around on proposed Palis Drive at the unit boundary and for a 15' wide all-wea loop road to connect the ends of proposed Palisades D
Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the final' 'Unit f4, the applicant shall dedicate and enter into a se agreement to improve the remainder of Palisades Drive.
29) If the existing 14 inch water line lies under or within 4 curb, gutter and sidewalk of Terrace Court, as approved o
improvement plans for Unit #6, the applicant shall deposi and/or enter into a secured agreement to relocate the lin alignnient to conform with City of Carlsbad Standards.
- 28)
..
-5- .
I a .*
'.
I I.
'h 1 1' .
30) Waterline improvements for each unit shall include any looi systems outside the unit .boundary and interim appurtenance! as blowoffs, as required by the City Engineer, based on thc
engineer's calculations required in Condition 26 (f) above suppl ements thereto.
31) Dedication of El Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue shall inc'
a waiver o+' dJrect access rjghts from the lots shown on eac map as abutting thereon, except don9 the modified access .
along a portion of the northerly edge of Tamarack Avenue.
I
.
.-
--.
_.
-6-
m 0 -*
'- . I
I ,x 9 'p I
SECTION 11: BACKGROUND b
Location and Description of Property!
The 43.99 acre vacant parcel is located west of El Camino Real between Kelly Drive and Chestnut Avenue.
The property is characterized by rough topography and general1
occupies higher ground than surrounding development.
A portion of the parcel has been rough graded and the general alignment of Tamarack established.
Tamarack Avenue will be extended through.the proposed project connecting Tamarack to El Camino Real.
Existing Zoning-: /
Subject Property: Planned Community
.. East: Planned Community
Morth: R-I-15,000 South: R-1-15,000
.Wert: R-1-15,000
Existing Land -- Use:
Subject Property: Vacant
. North: Single Family Residences South: Single Family Residences East: First Phase Condominiums West: Sing!e Family Residences
Past History and Related Cases:
City Council Resolution No. 3136 approved a zone change from R-A-lO1OOO to Planned Community (P-C) for the subject propertj
on June 5, 1973.
Specific Plan 115, (City Council Resolution No. 3177-, August 7
1973) was approved for 331 condominium units on approximately
CT 73-8 (City Council Resolution 3178, August 7, 1973), approv
331 townhouse condominium units; however, only a portion of th
* and two spas) was finaled to allow building-permits (Map 8039, cov'ering approximately 20 acres).
City Council Resoluti.in 3137 (June 5, 1973) adc.ptcd Master Pla No, 108 for the subject property. In addition t.0 MP-108, Citj Council Resolution 3137 certified an Environmental Impact Repc (No. 129) for the project.
- 63 acres.
I entire project (116 townhouses, a swimming pool, a tennis cour
I
-7-
.. 0 06
.. -.
,I I 'r , 1' ' , Environmental Impact Information:.
appf i cant.
Staff has found that the information is adequate and as a rest
it has been determined that the project satisfies the Carlsbac Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 by Prior Cornplianct
General Plan Information:
The General Plan Land Use Plan Map designates the subject pro! as RM (Residential Medium, 4-10 dwelling units per acre). Tht submitted tract map provides 3.1 dwelling units per acre.
Pub1 i c Faci 1 i ti es :
Sewer and vater facilities will be available from the City.
The applicant will be required to build the "connecting link"
to Tamarack Avenue.
The site is. within the jurisdiction of the Carlsbad Unified School District.
l4ajor Planning Considerations:
Is the proposed subdivision consistent with the General Plan?
Does the proposed subdivision conform to the requirements of t PUD Ordinance?
' Supplemental information to EIR-729 has been submitted by the
. SECT'ION 111: DISCUSSION
Staff is concerned about the "frontage road" concept as preser. on the various exhibits. The applicant has attempted to avoid .. driveways along Tamarack Avenue by creating this parallel road The General Plan slates the following regarding secondary arte (Tamarack):
Guideline 5: Minimize private driveway access onto . -
--both major and secondary arterial roads
Guideline 6: Design roads so as to minimize conflict- ing traffic movenients such as turning, curb parking,
Guideline 15: Separate pedestrian bicycle and vehicular traffic where possible. .Also, establish a .separate syste of hiking trails, bicycle .paths and equestrian trails fro which motorized vehicles would be banned..
- uncontrolled access and frequent stops.
-8- 0,
0 ", . 1
'* '
\ 2' 1. 1
1
Street functions and standards:
Sedondary Arterials: "The main function of a secondary. arteria
is to conduct traffic from collector streets to and from major arterials or freeways. Land access is only a minor function o a secondary arterial and, therefore, parking should be discour and residential buildings should not have driveways entering a
secondary arteria!. Additiona49y, -it 4s good practice to avoi
situations where secondary arterials cross major arterials to f0rm.a continuous system, since this might result in a tendenc for traffic to use the secondary arterial in. lieu of a major arterial for long trips.
The frontage road as designed, channels pedestrian, bicycle an vehicular movements into one area. The frontage road area wil be at a significant grade (10%) in certain areM and will conf to a curved alignment. In addition, building pads on the stee areas. along the frontage road will be oriented in a terrace
configuration. This will create driveways dropping down from pad elevation to a relatively steep frontage road elevation.
.. Staff is also concerned about the potential use of the frGntag
road as a play area. Because it is steep in spots, the abilit to ccntrol bicyles, skateboards, etc. will be difficult. They is no curb shown (see Exhibit C, Tamarack Avenue profile) sepa ing the frontage road (cormon driveway on plans) from Tamarack The possibility of skateboards, balls and the like, rolling OL onto the secondary arterial is potentially a hazardous situatic
. . . There is a problem of possible conflict between service/emergc vehicles along Tamarac'k Avenue. Trash trucks and fire trucks cannot be accommodated by the frontage road. It would be necc .for them to stop along.Tamarack Avenue to prtjvide service. Tf would be a hazardous situation, especially in the case of week trash service. Mail pick-up/delivery is also a possible pro.b1
depending on the. ultimate location of mail boxes.
Staff does not object to the frontage r'oad concept, however, .. considering the specific conditions on site, staff feels that potential hazards outweigh the positive aspects of the concept
- In addition to the circulation problems, certain requirements of the PUD ordinance are not met in staff's opinion.
The design of the frontage road along Tamarack Avenue does no1 provide for one guest parking space per dwellin'g unit. Each fifth house lacks a guest space.
meets the size. requirement -in square footage, however, staff
large vehicles.
\ '
I1
.- .
.The recreational vehicle storage area as shown on Exhibit C
. . does not consider the area usable for an adequate number of
n
L Ot -4 -_ I -,* f b , I .-
. *I . 1’ I
. Also, staff does not feel that the recreational vehicle area’ could be ‘adequately screened from the residences across the
2 street.
- Staff calculates that the applicant is providing about % acre .of usable open space. The PUD ordinance requires 600 sq. ft. of usable open space per dwelling unit. For the subject projc this would equal almost 2 acres.
The DH$C and R~t~~ation D~PuC~P kae N~ME~ bbncern &,C
. lack of usable open space area provided considering the numbev
(separating the subdivision into distinct areas). For example the applicant shows an open space lot on the western boundary (lot 110, Exhibit C) that is shaded in, however, only about ha of-this area is usable open space, the remainder is in slope.
The applicant has expressed a desire to calculate the open spa and recreational vehicle parking areas required based on the e tire project (condominiums with recreational facilities and th
current request).
Staff believes that because the currently requested subdivisio is a *distinctly, different residential iand use covering a relatively large area of unusual topography, it should be con- sidered a separate project.
NOTE: Staff has been informed by an’adjacent property owne
.. units requested, small lot size and fairly rough topography
(Mr. Schwab, NE corner of Birch and Skyline) that litigation is in process to settle a land ownership dispute over a portion of the subject subdivision.
Mr. Schwab asked that the requested subdivision be continued until a decision has been made establishin a property owner. The property in dispute is genera in the area of lots 112 and 113 and a portion of the Tamarack Avenue as shown on Exhib-it C.
It was indicated to Mr. Schwab that staff felt the matter should be one between the property owners.
Previous City- action has been taken regarding the subject property (approval of Master Plan, Specific’
-% Plan and Tract Map) under the same circumstances.
. The property ownership has been disputed for a numbe of years.
-
TH:mdp: ar
(1 2/3/76)
Attachments: Exhibit A, 10/1/76, Exhibit B, 10/1/76 I Exhibit C, 10/29/76 Exhibit D, 10/29/761 Letter from John Douglass, 10/29/76
b EIR Supplemental Information
9'4 fpJ %Tad . "G2,
rA 92008 TELEPHONE ( /a P '.3dAzb%i.ui w -4 Ld Cl"sJ '+W Vd icL -:a .*;M w%+" - .. -..d
Ci)MPhJI\IfT:X BUILDERS 0, P. 0.
ha '-2AWa iaw -- 3X 5114 0 CARLSBAD, CALIF0
' OctoBer 29, 1976
' Platining commission
City of Carfsbad
Carl sbad , tal jforn7L a
Re; Tentative Subdivision Map for Carlsbad Tract No. 76
Honorable Corrmissioners:
Delivered to the City via Mr. Donald Agatep, Planning Director, with this
letter are 20 further revised sets of maps and related drawings for our pr
posed development of the balance of this project. They have been further revised in our efforts to conform to the direction recently given us by Mr. Tim Flanagan, City Engineer, and other members of the City staff. 1
Our new plan QOW includes only 136 residential lots in thi! same area in which 217 residential lots had been previously approved in tentative tract
73-8. dwelling units per acre as compared io nearly five dwelling units per acre in the previously approved tentative map.
Another bette?ment in our new plan 5eing presented to you is that all of t
majority of the lots in the previ.ous1y approved plan provided for attacked townhomes.
The sales price range for these homes we now plan to build will be frorn $60,000 to $120,000 depending upon floor area, special architectural featQ and lot characteristics. Most of our buyers are expected to be mature far
. lies having grown children who are not living with their parents.
1 t'
1
Carl sbad Pal i sades
These fewer number of lots result in a new lowered density of 3-99
homes to be built thereon will be detached and of larger size and value
The townhomes we have built in our previous development phase have been ve well received by the public. A number of them have been purchased by citi of Carlsbad. The new homes we plan to build in this new phase of developrr will have even more public acceptance 2nd community prestige.
Please recormend approval of this new tentative subdivision map to the Cit Counci 1 .
. Respectful ly submi tted, .I)
. DOUGLASS SOifTHWESY CORPORATION F+L&!<& President ohn C. DougPass
JCDjr: cab
End. ..
,.
. , .-
..
.-- --
Descr i pti on of Request :
. FORM PLANNING 52 ..
..
..TIE OF T)~I~:LIC i-mrw~:~ y
' SP-115.jR) ..
NCTICE IS ItERED'i GIVEN that the .Plij\ItIi ng Corn1ri.i ssion of the City of CarIsI.),
w.il? ho'iti 3. public hcaring 3.t the City Counc-il Cnamters, 1200 Elm Avenue, Car'tsba
Ci$ifoyylji;, al; 7100 [J,f*l, oi? k/edri(:sday, liiarch 9, 1977, to' consider an spplicatiot-1
sdopti Oil of a specific plan zmcnd!ilcn-t to delete ccr-ta-i n areas froin Speci -Ti c P'1at-1 Ho. 715 on property located on both sides of Tamarack $,venue betwen 11-1 C;uiiino Re
and Skyliiie Dt-iiie, aiic! as shown on $!le map below.
Those pp\*::cj;-is wish-ing to spe&I< 0;: this proposal are coi-dial'ly Snv5 ted 'GO a'i..%end the pi,;b'l-ic hc!cr-ii?gG
P1 ar1il-i ny D~pa.rtment.
Ji[>?!- 1 CANT : 30iiH C. DOUGLASS, JR,
If you hij.ve any quest-ions, please call 729-'118'1 and ask for
. iI!GLISH: !'~ti~i,!~.~.~ 26, 1977 ,CITY OF CARLSBAD PLII.IINII'<G COP$!!:SSION
I a 1) e
- I' .( . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
- - , -A*
SP-l15(A)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City 01 Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chamber: 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 749 P,M, on Tuesday,
April 5, 1977, to consider an application for adoption of a
specific plan amendment to delete certain areas from Specific PI No. 115 on property located on both sides of Tamarack Avenue bel
El Camino Real and Skyline Drive, and as shown on the map below,
APPLICANT: JOHN C. DOUGLASS, JR.
PUBLISH: March 23, 1977 ..
CARLSBAD CITY COUN(
...
.......
................
*.
I!
.- a,
............ .... ......... ......... ,.. . ... .. , I ,, .. , SP !I5 ca : CQMpiLEn f3Y C1-T)' OF CC\RLSBAI) r>LAg,f\d\NG PEPT FROM EXr;3 '
I$t_{O\f,!r\l IIJ SAP$ DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR ROOK 207 PAGE 20
q,p~l?c~~ 9 AND AppLlCANT, JOHN C DOUGi-ASs JR .'
.I .
1
:>
j r
I a W w
1
i $. *' 1 NOTICE OF FUELIC HEARING
I SP-11 !(A)
$& I
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers
1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:OO P.M. on Tuesday, ,Apr-il 5, 1977, to consider a.n application For adoption of a specific plan amendnient to delete certain areas from Spec.ific P1 No. 915 on property located on both sides of Tamarack Avenue bet
. El Camino Real and Skyline.Drive, and as shown on the map below.
. APPLICANT: JOHN C. DOUGLASS, JR.
PUBLISH: March 'I 23, 1977
CARLSBAD CITY COUNC
".
,e , .
.I
.. ,. '.
*: 9 : I. . ... ..
I, ! It ..
.. 4. - * , .9. .... ............ ..... ................. . ./ >. ....-.... ..(.. .,. j '
6, ..
I SP I15 A
' ; co~qpi1-.~~~~ ~3y cl-cy' OF &ARI-~:~,~D pLhfiN\Nh PiPT FROM I?.b:rA. -
.t ~ * \Sl-i(j\t,/[J [Id $AI\! DIEGO cO\)x*\''f &SSESSt>[? t>OOI< 207 [:/iGl: 20
:I
a ~u/\r>rr.-i n r\k\13 P,PP! ICANT. ,IT)t-IN C DO\!GI-ASS Jn '
r
*. e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARI~
-. ,( .' 4 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (CT 76-15)
* . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (.PUD-6)
I
I
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the Ci
' Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Cht
1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:OO P.M., on Tu€ April 5, 1977, to consider a request for development of 14: family detached dwellings on 43.99 acres on property locate both sides of the Tamarack Avenue Extension between El Cami
and Skyline Drive? and more partisuliuly desGribed 0s;
That portion of Lot "I" of RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, in tl
according to the Map thereof No. 823, filed in the Ofi of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November 1 1896.
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califc
APPLICANT: DOUGLASS SOUTHWEST CORPORATION
PUBLISH: March 23, 1977 CARLSBAD CITY COUF
NOTICE OF PUBLIt HtAPXI4G
PLAfiI.I[:D IJIiIT DCVEL.0 VEtIl , i'U0-66
1- TCNTATIVE TRACl llAP (CT 7G-15) - 1-
NOTICC IS HEREGY GI\!EI! that the Planning Commission cf the ! f - of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at ne Cfty Coun:i! Ci:s:r~h 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:OC P.I.I., on ~~~pdnesda Narch 9, 1977, to consider a request for development of 143 sing family detached dwellings on 43.99 acres on property located on sides of the Tamarack Avenue Extension between El Carnino Real an Skyline Drive, and more particularly described as:
Lf' That portion of Lot "I" of RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to"the Map thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1896.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially in to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please
729-1181 and ask for the Planning Department.
-I - APPLICANT: DOUGLASS SOUTHWEST CORPORATION
PUBLISH: February 26, 1977 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAflNING COI
w? n3urne )I iierrjerr. .9].8 Neb1 i ni: Di-i ve .. Cal i -f s 920G8 " eo - I... I_ -,*-,. , ...._.. _. __._.._.
C3.r-i sijad , .-< y 1 ' 6' c,
tiv.c:/nl ey 'i Margaret 1 Machiimer 3 Phi 11 S p 8,120 Si:yl j ne ,Road Sharrattt, Cecil 8. Cay] jjatj, 9 Ca'l -if, 92008 4916 Neb1 i n3. Dr.i ve 4.955 ,Avj 12 Avenue Carl shad 5 Cii if" 92008 Carlsbad, Cal if.
5
,
5 P- ) /s/R-3
1 Pennlonj ?fimllel fi C, 0.1' 'r. 13 7
" M!ng?, Bernarc! j_ ' 4353 Avila. Avenue lil~L. I 1 4 RiLhurl
Carlsbad, Calif. 22718 Map7 e Avenue
Torrance, Cal i if. 90505
4iX Skylirie Road Carlsbad, Ca?-i-F. , 92CO8
..
Testermans Nonte 1
.' 49.17 Neblina Crive ' ' 4951 Avila Averiue
Carl sbad , Cal i 5.
Ausman, Frank & Dar!a
Carl shad , Cal if . 92008
n, Charles % Alice
Sky1 i ne lhad Car'] 2ba.d 9 Cal if. 92008
Mansel?, Jack & Nancy : Ocallaghan, John I 4949 Avila Avefiue Carlsbad, Calif..
4936 Auila Avenue
CAr! SLad , Cai if .
Mol f rich 5 Rrttiur .4150 Sky1 i r?e Road Cqi...! cl, 92008
\. ,,~a.d, Cali-F, 92098
I.
Clfne, James Thornpyon s Hcward
Car: sbad 9 Cal if. Carl s bad, Cal i f . . 4947 Aviia Avenue '. 4334 Avila Avenue Arc? di s.conc! 2 Frank 4035 A? to Strree.l 9)cean: f de, Ca7 .i F. 92054 92008
-; Sidda? 1 ? Robert. 8:
: - 4945 Avila Ave;?.r.is
Thomas 5 liarry
San Diego, Calif* 92126 hi 111GI Avenitia De1 Gato F1 o 'YTc~ Ifichistri es 421C Skyl'ne R03.d Carl sbad 5 Cal .i.F, Carlsbad, Calif c 32008 .
.Y -
, i
f Jackson, Nadine Stesenson 5 .Robert E: Teresa
CArlsbad, Calif. 92008 t,', . 4930 Avila Avenue ; .' 494.3 A..uOa Avenut U keg awa s ti .i ra s ir, -i 4218. Skyiine Rcad,
Ca;"t sbad 3 Cal if t 92008 Carl sbad 9 Cai i fa
.j Wise, Jess 'P; Joy( 4941 Rvi 1 a !\venui
Carl si;ad 9 Cal if .
Sothers, Carlos & tuisa
CArlsbad, Calif. 92008 _, ;
%'- 4.928 Avila Avenue Prep;.! t.t , .John P.O. Box 75037 Los Angel es , Ca.7 if. 90905
!
L ; L.R. Partmershfp
. c/o Kamr Const..
1. 4917 Refugio Avenue ' Carlsbad, Calif.
White, Jean 8 Frances
Carl s bad 5 Cal if . Dcl::kwor!;h, Nal ter
,' '251 Aspei?wood Lane
Eticiti'ltas, Cal -if. 920211- 92008
Cusunano, Joseph & Grace
Carl sbad , Cal if. 92008
N.icol., Robert & 1 4555 Prieste 9r.i' % 4.916 Refugio Avenue . Her< "Lage 3 A1 3i.i 8 I<athl een
4920 N&l i na Dri vc
Ca)*;<!>aci - Cal -if Wnrin Carl ch>d ?,?I i?
1 ackwl1 , Wi 11 i m
I Cdrl sbad, Cal i Torr!
ll'Ji CIibll>L-) i. I I . la'i: C,LIt .
W02y Skyl iiie Road
- .<r~,r~ L-gr-i c>burri KOC~~I, . . 1 i.;:j..tna -* iijils, ~ali4. $2653 WO?~ Sicyljnc ~r-ad -
.I& Carlsbad, Calif. 92008
9 ..' , ' r**
4
Lmson, Gary S, Esther htler, Lester & Ruth ,-, RichGrds 4 Edward 6 3920 !io1 ly PFae LI?. 4024 Sky1 i; I-IE Road 4039 Sunnyhi 11 Roa
Cart s5dd p Ca 1 if , 92008 Carlsl)ati, ~aj -if. 92008 4 7' Carl sbad , Cal if e > ' f-t
3'.
Servi 5 Nelvin 8 Hdrrjai; Dayton, CI-iar1c.s t; Dom2
3930 ~i*7b/ Lrne Lane 4040 Skyl ;ne Rcad
Carl s bad % Ca'l i f . 92GciO8 CAr 1 sbad, Cai if. 92008
r"iii7 lird g iULk 4051 SKyline Road
Carl sb? 5 Cal i f .
DomeS Robt & Caro?
320 Heinl ock Street 4053 Skylinz Road 4061 Skyline Road Carlsbad, Cal-if'. 92058 Carlsbad, Ca?if. 92008
winslow, James & Alice Gerhard 3 El i zabetii
Carl sbad 9 Cal f I' .
FlcCarthy 5 Mi chael Kilian, Robt Er Jane Ke1 ly , El si e
3453 Ho'l ly Brae Ln. i F.O. Box 35 j 4073 Skyl-ice Rcdd Carlsbad, Calif. * Carlsbad, Calif. 92008 Carl sbad B Ca 1 i f 92008
Hughes, Jaines II Marsha Schwcb, l?ona!d z( Patt:'
4 McCe!lcn, Ccrald 3955 Holly Brae Lane ' 4080 Skyline Road , ' 4079 Sky? ir!e Road Carl sbad 5 Ca'l if . 92008 CAr! sbad 5 Cal i f . 92OC8 Carl sbad 7 Cai if.
f 1
Hot bi -i ng 9 liii 11 .i am & Mar? e Carmi chacl , DoroCl
33X Skyline Road 4060 Skyiine Road 4105 Sky?ine Kcad Carl sbad 5 Ca'! i i'. Carlsbad, Cal if. 92008 Carl shad 9 Cal i 1'. 92008
Robertson, Virginia et.af ~
t
<
Joebchen, Neil & Viviafi Grant, John .& Mary
Carlsbad, Calif. 92008 Carl shad 5 Cal if.
Chas?, AlexanciPr i
Carl sbad, Ca7 < T a
3948 Skyline Road ' 4056 Skylirie Road > 4115 Sky? it?€ ROGd
I ( Schel i neniann y Robt . b Haze?
3958 Skyline Road 4517 Cove Drive 4.125 Skyline Road Carl shad 3 Ca7 if. 92008 Carl sbad 5 Cal i P. 92008
Belmont, Donald & Ann tlarri sen, tioward
Carl sbad y Cal if (.
i
\
I
Stream I. Francy I-luiiking, Leomrd & Anne Mcinzrny, Michael 4009 S: yline Road r 4005 Skyline Road ' 4135 Sky?-it-13 Road Carlsbad, Caj -if a 92008 Carlsbad, Calif. 92008 Carlsbad, Calif.
Dewitt, Birchard SI Catherine
4034 Skyline Road
Carl sbad, Ca.1 if . 92008 4C15 Skyline Road 4125 Skyline Road Travi s y Ceqi 1
Cai.? sbad $ Ca: if .
Brokenshi re, Roy
Carl sbad, Cel if. 92008
Nu-] ILL wi pi-!['; U,-LC, " KLt';K!.i\k)
NED Ui.IiT DEVELOPMENT (PUh TATIVE TRACT MAP (CT 76-15]
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the Ci.l Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Cham
'1200 Elm Avenues Carlsbad, California, at 7:OO P.M., on Tues April 5, 1977, to consider a request for development of 14.3 family detached dwellings on 43.99 a.cres on property located
both sides of the Tamarack Avenue Extension between El Camir and Skyline Drive, and more particularly described as:
ri 'j
'I
.
P
That portion of Lot "I" of RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, in the City of Carlsbad; County of San Dieqo, State of Califor according to the Map thereof No.. 823, filed in the Off- of the County Recorder of San Diego County, November lt 1896.
AP P L I CANT :
PUBLISH: March 23, 1977
$5 .DOUGLAS S S OUTH\dE ST CO RP 0 RAT IO iq '
CARLSBAD CITY COrJNl
--- -__ - -