HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-05-03; City Council; 5053; 12 Lot 11 Dwelling Unit Residential Development^ CITY OF CARLSBAD- - ^
W ' " W !!
Initial:
AGENDA BILL NO. ^A&3 Dept. Hd.'
DATE; May 3' 1977 . • City Atty
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING ' City Mgr.
SUBJECT:::
CASE NO: CT 77-6/PUD-10
APPLICANT: R.J. BRYAN
APPROVAL OF A 12 LOT 11 DWELLING UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
STATEMENT OF THE MATTER' : '
REQUEST;
The property is situated on the south side of Chestnut Avenue,
between Highland and Adams. It is on 2.25 acre parcel that has
a depth of 462 feet. A request for a Planned Unit Development is
necessary for the property to achieve it's zoning potential.
This PUD provides private streets, but does not exclude possible future
public street systems within this large block. The PUD also provides
attached units and groups them around usable open areas, recreational
facilities, visitors parking and storage space.
The Planning Commission recommended that these two actions be
approved as per staff report with the added condition to the PUD
requiring that any City Council policy regarding energy and water
conservation measures in effect at time of building permits be met.
The merits of the PUD were discussed.by the Commission. In addition,
to the findings listed in the staff report the Planning Commission
found that the project met the design criteria and intent of the PUD
regulations. These additional facts are contained in Resolution No.
1358, finding 3.
EXHIBITS;
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1354 and 1358.
Staff Report dated April 13, 1977.
Location Map, CT 77-6/PUD-10.
Exhibit A, dated April 5, 1977, CT 77-6
Exhibit B, dated March 3, 1977,,PUD-10
Exhibit-C, dated March 3, 1977X
Exhibit D, dated March 23, 1977—-
Exhibit E, dated April 6, 1977--'"
Exhibit F, dated April 6, 1977-
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Attorney be directed to prepare documents
approving CT 77-6 and PUD-10 as per Planning Commission Resolution
Nos: 1354 and 1358 and that appropriate sewer conditions consistent
with recently approved maps be added.
(See Page 2 for Council action)
FORM PLANNING 73
e
-2-
AGENDA BILL NO. 5053
Council action
5-3-77 Following the public hearing the City Attorney was instructed
to prepare documents approving the tentative map for CT 77-6
and the Planned Unit Development PUD-10 as per Planning
Commission Resolution No.s 1354 and 1358; that appropriate sewer
conditions consistent with recently approved maps be added;
further, that the conditions as outlined in the Planning Director's
memorandum jetted April 29, 1977, be added to the PUD.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 of the County Recorder of said San Diego County,
December 9, 1915, Assessor's Book 205, Page 210,
Parcel 07
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the
13
12
Planning Commission; and
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
wit:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1354
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
-OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
A TRACT MAP TO PROVIDE A 12 LOT 11 DWELLING UNIT
DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT
BETWEEN HIGHLAND AND ADAMS.
CASE NO.: CT 77-6
APPLICANT; R. J. BRYAN ;
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property, to
That portion of Tract 240 of Thum Lands, in the
City of Carlsbad, State of California, according
to the Map thereof No. 1681, filed in the office
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided
__ by the "Carlsbad Municipal Code;" andlo
WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the subject request16
was held on April 13, 1977, at the time and in the place specified
5
17
in the public hearing notice,pursuant to the provision of the18
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
who desired to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map request (CT 77-6) and found
the following facts and reasons to exist:
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because:
a) The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site for
Residential low-medium density (0-4 dwelling units per
acre). The subject project will provide approximately
4.8 dwelling units per acre under the provision allowing
a 25% increase in density under certain circumstances.
*.
2) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con-
sistent with the General Plan because:
2
a) The project will provide orderly residential development;
facilities and/or expense to the taxpayer; and
5
3) The site is physically suitable,for the type of development
topographical or geologic features on the site;
8
b) No significant natural vegetation exists on the site.
9
4) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
10
11
allowable maximum.
IE
b) There are no significant physical features on the site
13
14
21
26
27
28
and
b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public
because:
a) The proposed development will not effect any unusual
development because:
a) Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the
that would hinder development as planned.
5) The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements are
not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or sub-
stantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their15..
habitat because:
16
a) A Negative Declaration has been issued for the proposed
17
18
not likely to cause serious public health problems because:
19
a) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
20
7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will
development.
6) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are
not conflict with the easements required by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision because:22
23
24
shorelines because:
a) The subdivision does not front on any of the above.
a) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
8) The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public
waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines or
25
9) The subject application has complied with the requirements of
:the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972
because:
- 2 -
1
based on the following findings:
4w
. 3
4
the increase in traffic.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a) A Negative Declaration has been issued for the project
1. The project is within an urbanized area.
2. No significant vegetation or landforms exist on the
site.
3. The existing street systems are capable of handling
10) The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with applicable
City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because:
a) At this time, all necessary public facilities, including
sewer service, are available to serve the subject project
as proposed. However, sewer facilities may not be avail-
able when applications are made for building permits. If
sewer facilities are not available at the time of building
permit application, building permits will not be issued
until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council can be
made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will
be available prior to occupancy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That in view of the findings heretofore made and considering
the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commission
is to approve CT 77-6, subject to the following conditions:
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the
application and any attachments thereto and as shown on
the plot plan submitted labeled Exhibit A, dated April 5,
2) Park-in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City prior to
approval of the final map. No credit shall be given for
the open space or recreational facilities provided by
this development.
3) A 30' offer-of-dedication shall be made to the City along
the westerly and southerly boundaries of this tract prior
to, or concurrent with final map approval.
4) All necessary hydrants as required by the Fire Department
shall be in service prior to combustibles being placed
on site.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on April 13, 1977,
by the following vote, to wit:
- 3 -
1
2
I 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JAMBS' C.HAGA1MAN/ SECRETARY
•""V
AYES:
NOES:
Commissioners Larson, Rombotis, Nelson, Fikes,
Jose and Watson
Commissioner L'Heureux
ERIC LARSON, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
,(jL* .....
1
2
' 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
.12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1358
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
"THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CON-
CERNING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR
A 12 LOT 11 DWELLING UNIT DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT
BETWEEN HIGHLAND AND ADAMS.
CASE NO.: PUD-10
APPLICANT ; R. J. BRYAN
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property
to wit:
That portion of Tract 240 of Thum Lands, in the
City of Carlsbad, State of California, according
to the Map thereof No. 1681, filed in the office
of the County Recorder of said San Diego County,
December 9, 1915> Assessor's Book 205, Page 210,
Parcel 07
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as
provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was held at the time and in the
place specified in said notice on April 13, 1977; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con-
sidering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
who desired to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planned Unit Development and found the following
facts and reasons to exist:
1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and
desirable to provide a service or facility which will contrib-
ute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the
community because:
a) The development will allow the subject property to be
developed to its allowable potential and density.
2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or gen-
eral welfare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity
or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity
because:
I
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
27
a) The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner similar
to the anticipated future density in the area.
i
3) The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 and all
minimum development standards set forth in Section
21.45.120 will be be met because:
a) The property could not be developed with public streets.
However, much property would be devoted in public streets
and the street would not align properly with existing
streets or street reservation. In addition, the individual
lots would have to be designed in a manner not conducive
tp good neighborhood unity.
b) The units are grouped into attached pairs, giving usable
areas for recreation, visitor parking and storage.
c) The plan retains option for future exterior street system
in the block. "
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That in view of the findings heretofore made and considering
the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commission
is to approve PUD-10, subject to the following conditions.
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the
application and any attachments thereto, and as shown on
the Plans submitted labeled Exhibits B & C, dated March 3,
1977; Exhibit D, dated March 23, 1977; and Exhibit E & F
dated April 6, 1977. The location of all roadways,
parking areas, landscaping and other facilities or
features shall be located substantially as shown on
Exhibit D, E and F unless otherwise provided herein.
2) The conditions shall be appropriately completed and the
project commenced within 18 months from final City action.
3) In addition to the required details to be shown on the
final PUD plan, the following shall be included:
23
a) Proper lot numbers in sequence.
24
b) 24' minimum driveway width.
c) An acceptable redesign of the guest parking area,
showing not less than 11 spaces.
d) Fencing plan for the recreational vehicle storage
area.
28
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
28
23
,-
£4
25
26
27
28
4) Building locations and setbacks shall be shown on the final PUD
plan in substantial conformance with Exhibit C, and in no case
shall they exceed the provisions of Section 21.45.120 No. 13.
5) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
submit landscape and irrigation plans to the Director of Parks
& Recreation for review and approval. All improvements shall
be installed prior to final occupancy.
6) Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular safety shall be
provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of final occupancy.
7) All utilities shall be placed underground. The C C & R's
for this project shall state that individual, exterior tele-
vision antennas are not permitted.
8) One-hour fire-resistive construction shall be utilized for all
separation walls, floors and ceilings. A separate utility
system shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
PLASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on April 13, 1977, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
Commissioners Larson, Rombotis, Nelson, Fikes,
Jose and Watson
Commissioner L'Heureux
ERIC LARSON, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
JAMES C. HAGAMAN/ SECRETARY
STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 13, 1977
TO:- PLANNING COMMISSION • ,
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT '
CASE NO: CT 77-6/PUD-10 . . '
APPLICANT: R.J. BRYAN
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A TRACT MAP AND PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE A 12 LOT .11 DWELLING
UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
SECTION I; RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of CT 77-6 and PUD-10 based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
FINDINGS (CT 77-6)
:1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because:
a) The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site for
Residential low-medium density (o-4 dwelling units per
acre). The subject project will provide approximately
4.8 dwelling units per acre-under the provision allowing
a 25% increase in density under certain circumstances.
2) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con-
sistent with the General Plan because:
a) The project will provide orderly residential development;
and ' ' .
b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public
. facilities and/or expense to the taxpayer; and
3) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
because: .
a) The proposed development will not effect any unusual
topographic or geologic features on the site;
b) No significant natural vegetation exists on the site.
4) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development because: .
a) • Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the allowable
maximum. ' *
b) ' There are no .significant physcial features on the site that •
would hinder development as planned.
.1
5) The design of the subdivision or the. imposed improvements are
not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or sub-
stantially and unavoidably.injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat because:
- a) A Negative Declaration has been issued for the proposed
development.
6) The design of the subdivision or the.type of improvements are
not likely to cause serious public health problems because:
a) • Conditions of approval will insure the above.
7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will
not conflict with the easements required by the public at large
for access through or use of property within-the proposed
subdivision because:
8)
9)
a)
a) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
The -subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public
waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines or
shorelines because:
a) The subdivision does not front on any of the above.
The subject application has complied with the requirements of
the Carlsbad Environmental Protection .Ordiance of 1972 because:
a). A Negative Declaration has been issued for the project
based on the following' findings:
1. The project is within an urbanized area.
2. No significant vegetation or landforms exist on the site,
3. The existing•street systems are capable of handling
the increase in traffic.
The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with applicable
City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because:
At this time, all necessary public facilities, including
sewer service, are available to serve the subject project
as proposed. However, sewer facilities may" not be avail-
able when applications are made for building permits. If
sewer facilities are not available at the time of building
permit application, building permits will not be issued
until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council can be
made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will
be available prior to occupancy. '
CONDITIONS (CT 77-6)
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application
and any attachments thereto and as shown on the plot plan submitted
. • labeled Exhibit A, dated April 5> 1977. :
2) P'ark-in-lieu fe^g' shall be paid to the City/prior to approval
'of the final map. No credit shall be given for the open space
or recreational facilities provided by this development.
3). A 30' offer-of-dedication shall be made to the City along the
westerly and southerly boundaries of this tract prior to, or.
concurrent with final map approval. . •
4) All necessary hydrants as .required by the Fire Department shall
be in service prior to combustables being placed on site.
FINDINGS (PUD-10)
1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and
desirable to provide a service.or facility which will contribute
to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community
because:
a) The development will allow the subject property to be developed
to its allowable potential and density.
2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity or in-
jurious to property or improvements in the vicinity because:
a) The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner similar to the
anticipated future density in the area.
3) The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.11-0 and all minimum
development standards set forth in Section 21.45.120 will be met
because:
, •' a) The plot plan and additional exhibits include all development
aspects required.
b) The plot plan and additional exhibits include adequate provisions
for open space, recreational facilities, circulation and parking.
cj The project will be de'veloped in a manner to be compatible with
surrounding development.
d) Internal circulation is acceptable to the City Engineer as
shown on the plot plan and by conditions of approval.
e) Private recreational facilites are readily accessible.
f) Dwelling unit density does not exceed the density allowed in
the underlying zone (R-1-7500) .
CONDITIONS (PUD-10) . '
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application
and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the Plans submitted
labeled Exhibits B &C dated March 3, 1977; ExhibitD , dated Marph
23, 1977; and Exhibit E &F, dated April 6, 1977. The location of
' all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and other facilities or
features shall be located substantially as shpwn on Exhibit D,E & F
unless otherwise provided herein. .
2) All conditions shall be appropriately completed and the
project commenced within 18 months from final City action.
3) In addition to the required details to be shown on the final,
PUD plan, the following shall be included: .
a) Proper lot numbers in sequence
b) 24' minimum driveway width .
c) An acceptable redesign of the quest parking area, showing
not less than 11 spaces.
d) .Fencing plan for the recreational vehicle storage area.
4) Building locations and setbacks shall be shown on the final
PUD plan in substantial conformance with Exhibit C, and in
no case shall they exceed the provisions of section 21.45.120
No. 13.
5) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant"shall
submit 'la'ndscape and irrigation plans to the Director of Parks &
Recreation for review and approval. All improvements shall be
installed prior to final occupancy.
6) Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular safety shall be
provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the.
issuance of final occupancy.
7) All utilities shall be placed underground. The C.C&R's for this
project shall state that individual, exterior television antennas
are not permitted.
8) One-hour fire-resistive construction shall be utilized for all
separation walls, floors and ceilings. A separate utility system
shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
SECTION II: BACKGROUND
Location and Description of Property
The 2.25 acre parcel is located on the south side of Chestnut
between Highland and Adams. The property has approximately 211
feet of frontage on Chestnut and 462 feet of depth.
The flat site is currently under cultivation and is adjacent to
Other cultivated land.
Woodland Way, a cul-de-sac, is located on the north side of
Chestnut across the street from the project site. Street improve-
ments (curbs, gutters, sidewalks) exist on Chestnut between
Highland and Pio Pico.
Existing_Zpning:
Subject Property: R-l-7500
North: R-l-7500
South: R-l-7500
East: R-l-7500
West: R-l-7500
Existing Land Use;
Subject Property: Agriculture
North: Single family residential
South: Agriculture and SFR's
East: Agriculture, PUD
West: SFR's
History and Related Cases .
The property was owned for a number of years by a church group
and was planned for development by the group for a church.
A Tract Map and Planned Unit Development for six residences was
approved for property fronting on Highland Drive (CT 76-8, PUD-2).
The parcel is 1.45 acres and the dwelling units constitute 4
dwelling units per acre. The development utilizes a private^street
that could at some future date be used for a portion of a through
public street-. This previously approved CT & PUD abut the subject
site o'n the south east.
Environmental Impact Information
An Environmental Impact Assessment has been filed 'and the_project .
issued a Negative Declaration based on the following findings:
1. The project is within an urbanized area.
2. No significant vegetation-or.landforms exist on the site
3. The existing street systems are capable of handling
'the increases in traffic.
General Plan Information.
The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site for Residential
Low-Medium density. (0-4 dwelling units per acre) .
The proposed project provides 4.8 dwelling units per acre.
This density is compatible with the General Plan under the
following provision in the Land Use Element page 23:
EXPLANATORY NOTE ON DENSITY RANGES: The densities established
for the low and low-medium density residential classifications .
simply designate the maximum number of dwelling units per
gross acre that would be permitted if all requirements are met.
In those exceptional cases where the base zone is consistent
with the land use designation but would permit a slightly
h-igher yield than that recommended in the low and low-medium ;
density residential classifications, the City may find that
the project is consistent with this element if it is compatible
with the objectives, policies, general land 'uses and programs
expressed herein and does not.exceed twenty five (25) percent
the maximum allocation. .'.••'
The underlying zoning (R-l-7500) would allow 13 'dwelling
units on the square footage of subject parcel. Without the
above "25%"provision; the subject parcel would yield 10
dwelling units. *
c
The Residential Guidelines of the Land Use Element state the following
in regard to other than the standard single family detached residences.
1) Retain the present predominance of single-family residences.
• "• throughout the community; while providing a variety of housing
types in the communities within the City, including townhouses,
condominiums, . apartments, mobile homes, modular and prefab- .
ricated housing. •
7), Achieve a variety and choice of. housing in all economic ranges
throughout the City.
8) Offer safe, healthful, attractive residential areas with a wide
range of housing types, styles and price levels in a variety
of locations.
9) Encourage cluster-type housing and other innovative housing
design.that provides adequate open areas around these developments.
Staff- -feels that the propsed residential design (common wall con-
dominium residential) achieves a number of positive results.
1) The design of the subdivision allows the
property owner to achieve the allowable
density under the General Plan.
2) The design allows the site to accommodate
adequate provision for future public street
systems. • '
3) The design provides -for an alternative
housing type within the area, while main-
taining the established density. _ . '
Guideline six of the Residential Guidelines provides for the pre-
servation of neighborhood atmosphere and identity in existing
residential areas. Staff does not feel that the project design
will have a negative impact on the existing neighborhood. Con- -•-
ditions of approval will insure Residential Low-Medium density
consistency. The- project will be developed with a common architec-
tural theme, much like.the Spanish Village project across Chestnut
on Spanish Way. .. . •
Public Facilities • • .
/ -At this time, all necessary public facilities, including sewer
( service, are available to serve the subject project as proposed.
\^ However, sewer facilities may not be available when applications
re made for building permits. If sewer facilities are not avail-
able at the time of building permit application, building permits
will not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City »
.Council can be made, to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities
will be available prior to occupancy.
The site is within the-Carlsbad Unified.School -District. A letter '
frpm the District is on file assuring the City that school physical
facilities will be available concurrent with need for this development.
Major Planning Considerations
Is the request consistent with the General Plan?
Does the request meet the intent and purpose and development
standards as provided in the PUD section-of the ordinance?
SECTION III; DISCUSSION
Staff feels that the proposed requests are consistent with the
General Plan (See the General Plan section of the background report).
Staff considers the proposed project to be in conformance with the
intent and purpose of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance under
the following categories of Section 21.45.010
2) Encourage imaginative and innovation.al planning of residential
neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas by offering a
wide variety of dwelling units and building types and site arrange-
ments with- well- integrated community facilities and services;
4) Permit greater flexibility in design than is possible through
strict application of conventional zoning and subdivision regulation.
In addition to the above, staff feels that the proposed project
relates well to the surrounding area, as stated in number three.
in the above section; because of the provision for future ded-
ication for internal block circulation.
The following summarizes the development standards in the PUD
Ordinance and how these requirements are met by the proposed plan:
1. Density
allowed: 5 du per acre (GP - 25% increase permitted)
proposed: 4'. 8
2. Yards '
allowed: (structures): 10' min.
proposed : 20'
allowed: (garages): 25' min.
proposed : 70' +
3. Coverage
allowed: 40% max.
proposed: 2.8% . •
• *
4. Height .
allowed: 35' max. ' . • .
proposed: 27' * •
.7
•*•*.
5 . Parking
required: 22 covered - 11 guest
proposed:. 22 covered - 13 guest
6: Storage Space • •
required: 440 Sq.Ft. Min.
proposed: 1196 Sq.Ft. .
7. Refuse Areas (5 residences or more/nonresidential)
Refuse areas as shown will function adequately.
8. Screening of Parking Area
Landscape plan requirement will assure .fulfillment of this
condition.
-.
9 . Usuable Open Space
required: 6600 Sq.Ft.
proposed: 9000 Sq.Ft.
10. N/A
11. Landscaping (not used for recreation)
Landscape plan requirement will assure fulfillment of this
condition. • .
12. Signs (in addition to underlying zone)
proposed: Type: Hand Carved Wood
Location: On 42' stumpstone wall on Chestnut
Height: 3'
Size: 2X8, 16 Sq.Ft.
13 . Placement of Buildings .
Proposals meets ordinance requirements.
14. Streets
Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement.
15. Pedestrian Walkways
Proposal meets ordinance requirements.
16. Lighting . ...
Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement,
17. Utilities . .
* i
Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement,
.8 • '
18. Building Construction Requirements:
Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement.
19. Planned Unit Development Lots • - •
Proposal meets ordinance requirements..
THrar
4/6/77
Exhibits;
Location Map
CT 77-6, Exhibit A, dated April 5, 1977
PUD-10, Exhibit B, dated March 3, 1977
Exhibit C, dated March 23, 1977.
Exhibit D, dated March 23, 1977
Exhibit E, dated April 6, 1977
Exhibit F, dated April 6, 1977.
.9
r
500
PUD - 10
CT 77-7
'leqiie/;t:__$^:2X-^
/_ t±:/'A<r
Coast Permit Area:
I
School District;, ^_
\>f-r SanUation District:
VUhir. Const Plan Arna:
i.\ y\ ;;;V^-<U \l\;&"
;
o
^*
^
?Q
I-?tn Qj ;o-o. j
City of Carlsbad
Planning Commission
COPY