Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-05-03; City Council; 5053; 12 Lot 11 Dwelling Unit Residential Development^ CITY OF CARLSBAD- - ^ W ' " W !! Initial: AGENDA BILL NO. ^A&3 Dept. Hd.' DATE; May 3' 1977 . • City Atty DEPARTMENT: PLANNING ' City Mgr. SUBJECT::: CASE NO: CT 77-6/PUD-10 APPLICANT: R.J. BRYAN APPROVAL OF A 12 LOT 11 DWELLING UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. STATEMENT OF THE MATTER' : ' REQUEST; The property is situated on the south side of Chestnut Avenue, between Highland and Adams. It is on 2.25 acre parcel that has a depth of 462 feet. A request for a Planned Unit Development is necessary for the property to achieve it's zoning potential. This PUD provides private streets, but does not exclude possible future public street systems within this large block. The PUD also provides attached units and groups them around usable open areas, recreational facilities, visitors parking and storage space. The Planning Commission recommended that these two actions be approved as per staff report with the added condition to the PUD requiring that any City Council policy regarding energy and water conservation measures in effect at time of building permits be met. The merits of the PUD were discussed.by the Commission. In addition, to the findings listed in the staff report the Planning Commission found that the project met the design criteria and intent of the PUD regulations. These additional facts are contained in Resolution No. 1358, finding 3. EXHIBITS; Planning Commission Resolution No. 1354 and 1358. Staff Report dated April 13, 1977. Location Map, CT 77-6/PUD-10. Exhibit A, dated April 5, 1977, CT 77-6 Exhibit B, dated March 3, 1977,,PUD-10 Exhibit-C, dated March 3, 1977X Exhibit D, dated March 23, 1977—- Exhibit E, dated April 6, 1977--'" Exhibit F, dated April 6, 1977- RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Attorney be directed to prepare documents approving CT 77-6 and PUD-10 as per Planning Commission Resolution Nos: 1354 and 1358 and that appropriate sewer conditions consistent with recently approved maps be added. (See Page 2 for Council action) FORM PLANNING 73 e -2- AGENDA BILL NO. 5053 Council action 5-3-77 Following the public hearing the City Attorney was instructed to prepare documents approving the tentative map for CT 77-6 and the Planned Unit Development PUD-10 as per Planning Commission Resolution No.s 1354 and 1358; that appropriate sewer conditions consistent with recently approved maps be added; further, that the conditions as outlined in the Planning Director's memorandum jetted April 29, 1977, be added to the PUD. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 of the County Recorder of said San Diego County, December 9, 1915, Assessor's Book 205, Page 210, Parcel 07 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the 13 12 Planning Commission; and 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1354 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY -OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TRACT MAP TO PROVIDE A 12 LOT 11 DWELLING UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT BETWEEN HIGHLAND AND ADAMS. CASE NO.: CT 77-6 APPLICANT; R. J. BRYAN ; WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property, to That portion of Tract 240 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 1681, filed in the office WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided __ by the "Carlsbad Municipal Code;" andlo WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the subject request16 was held on April 13, 1977, at the time and in the place specified 5 17 in the public hearing notice,pursuant to the provision of the18 Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map request (CT 77-6) and found the following facts and reasons to exist: 1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because: a) The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site for Residential low-medium density (0-4 dwelling units per acre). The subject project will provide approximately 4.8 dwelling units per acre under the provision allowing a 25% increase in density under certain circumstances. *. 2) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con- sistent with the General Plan because: 2 a) The project will provide orderly residential development; facilities and/or expense to the taxpayer; and 5 3) The site is physically suitable,for the type of development topographical or geologic features on the site; 8 b) No significant natural vegetation exists on the site. 9 4) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of 10 11 allowable maximum. IE b) There are no significant physical features on the site 13 14 21 26 27 28 and b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public because: a) The proposed development will not effect any unusual development because: a) Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the that would hinder development as planned. 5) The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or sub- stantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their15.. habitat because: 16 a) A Negative Declaration has been issued for the proposed 17 18 not likely to cause serious public health problems because: 19 a) Conditions of approval will insure the above. 20 7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will development. 6) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not conflict with the easements required by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision because:22 23 24 shorelines because: a) The subdivision does not front on any of the above. a) Conditions of approval will insure the above. 8) The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines or 25 9) The subject application has complied with the requirements of :the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 because: - 2 - 1 based on the following findings: 4w . 3 4 the increase in traffic. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a) A Negative Declaration has been issued for the project 1. The project is within an urbanized area. 2. No significant vegetation or landforms exist on the site. 3. The existing street systems are capable of handling 10) The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with applicable City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because: a) At this time, all necessary public facilities, including sewer service, are available to serve the subject project as proposed. However, sewer facilities may not be avail- able when applications are made for building permits. If sewer facilities are not available at the time of building permit application, building permits will not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council can be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will be available prior to occupancy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That in view of the findings heretofore made and considering the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commission is to approve CT 77-6, subject to the following conditions: 1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto and as shown on the plot plan submitted labeled Exhibit A, dated April 5, 2) Park-in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map. No credit shall be given for the open space or recreational facilities provided by this development. 3) A 30' offer-of-dedication shall be made to the City along the westerly and southerly boundaries of this tract prior to, or concurrent with final map approval. 4) All necessary hydrants as required by the Fire Department shall be in service prior to combustibles being placed on site. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on April 13, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: - 3 - 1 2 I 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMBS' C.HAGA1MAN/ SECRETARY •""V AYES: NOES: Commissioners Larson, Rombotis, Nelson, Fikes, Jose and Watson Commissioner L'Heureux ERIC LARSON, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: ,(jL* ..... 1 2 ' 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1358 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF "THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CON- CERNING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A 12 LOT 11 DWELLING UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT BETWEEN HIGHLAND AND ADAMS. CASE NO.: PUD-10 APPLICANT ; R. J. BRYAN WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property to wit: That portion of Tract 240 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 1681, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County, December 9, 1915> Assessor's Book 205, Page 210, Parcel 07 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was held at the time and in the place specified in said notice on April 13, 1977; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con- sidering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Planned Unit Development and found the following facts and reasons to exist: 1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a service or facility which will contrib- ute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community because: a) The development will allow the subject property to be developed to its allowable potential and density. 2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or gen- eral welfare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity because: I 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 27 a) The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner similar to the anticipated future density in the area. i 3) The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 and all minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.120 will be be met because: a) The property could not be developed with public streets. However, much property would be devoted in public streets and the street would not align properly with existing streets or street reservation. In addition, the individual lots would have to be designed in a manner not conducive tp good neighborhood unity. b) The units are grouped into attached pairs, giving usable areas for recreation, visitor parking and storage. c) The plan retains option for future exterior street system in the block. " NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That in view of the findings heretofore made and considering the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commission is to approve PUD-10, subject to the following conditions. 1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the Plans submitted labeled Exhibits B & C, dated March 3, 1977; Exhibit D, dated March 23, 1977; and Exhibit E & F dated April 6, 1977. The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and other facilities or features shall be located substantially as shown on Exhibit D, E and F unless otherwise provided herein. 2) The conditions shall be appropriately completed and the project commenced within 18 months from final City action. 3) In addition to the required details to be shown on the final PUD plan, the following shall be included: 23 a) Proper lot numbers in sequence. 24 b) 24' minimum driveway width. c) An acceptable redesign of the guest parking area, showing not less than 11 spaces. d) Fencing plan for the recreational vehicle storage area. 28 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 28 23 ,- £4 25 26 27 28 4) Building locations and setbacks shall be shown on the final PUD plan in substantial conformance with Exhibit C, and in no case shall they exceed the provisions of Section 21.45.120 No. 13. 5) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans to the Director of Parks & Recreation for review and approval. All improvements shall be installed prior to final occupancy. 6) Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular safety shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of final occupancy. 7) All utilities shall be placed underground. The C C & R's for this project shall state that individual, exterior tele- vision antennas are not permitted. 8) One-hour fire-resistive construction shall be utilized for all separation walls, floors and ceilings. A separate utility system shall be provided for each dwelling unit. PLASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on April 13, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Larson, Rombotis, Nelson, Fikes, Jose and Watson Commissioner L'Heureux ERIC LARSON, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: JAMES C. HAGAMAN/ SECRETARY STAFF REPORT DATE: APRIL 13, 1977 TO:- PLANNING COMMISSION • , FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' CASE NO: CT 77-6/PUD-10 . . ' APPLICANT: R.J. BRYAN REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A TRACT MAP AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE A 12 LOT .11 DWELLING UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. SECTION I; RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of CT 77-6 and PUD-10 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: FINDINGS (CT 77-6) :1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because: a) The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site for Residential low-medium density (o-4 dwelling units per acre). The subject project will provide approximately 4.8 dwelling units per acre-under the provision allowing a 25% increase in density under certain circumstances. 2) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con- sistent with the General Plan because: a) The project will provide orderly residential development; and ' ' . b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public . facilities and/or expense to the taxpayer; and 3) The site is physically suitable for the type of development because: . a) The proposed development will not effect any unusual topographic or geologic features on the site; b) No significant natural vegetation exists on the site. 4) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because: . a) • Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the allowable maximum. ' * b) ' There are no .significant physcial features on the site that • would hinder development as planned. .1 5) The design of the subdivision or the. imposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or sub- stantially and unavoidably.injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because: - a) A Negative Declaration has been issued for the proposed development. 6) The design of the subdivision or the.type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because: a) • Conditions of approval will insure the above. 7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with the easements required by the public at large for access through or use of property within-the proposed subdivision because: 8) 9) a) a) Conditions of approval will insure the above. The -subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines or shorelines because: a) The subdivision does not front on any of the above. The subject application has complied with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection .Ordiance of 1972 because: a). A Negative Declaration has been issued for the project based on the following' findings: 1. The project is within an urbanized area. 2. No significant vegetation or landforms exist on the site, 3. The existing•street systems are capable of handling the increase in traffic. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with applicable City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because: At this time, all necessary public facilities, including sewer service, are available to serve the subject project as proposed. However, sewer facilities may" not be avail- able when applications are made for building permits. If sewer facilities are not available at the time of building permit application, building permits will not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council can be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will be available prior to occupancy. ' CONDITIONS (CT 77-6) 1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto and as shown on the plot plan submitted . • labeled Exhibit A, dated April 5> 1977. : 2) P'ark-in-lieu fe^g' shall be paid to the City/prior to approval 'of the final map. No credit shall be given for the open space or recreational facilities provided by this development. 3). A 30' offer-of-dedication shall be made to the City along the westerly and southerly boundaries of this tract prior to, or. concurrent with final map approval. . • 4) All necessary hydrants as .required by the Fire Department shall be in service prior to combustables being placed on site. FINDINGS (PUD-10) 1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a service.or facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community because: a) The development will allow the subject property to be developed to its allowable potential and density. 2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity or in- jurious to property or improvements in the vicinity because: a) The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner similar to the anticipated future density in the area. 3) The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.11-0 and all minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.120 will be met because: , •' a) The plot plan and additional exhibits include all development aspects required. b) The plot plan and additional exhibits include adequate provisions for open space, recreational facilities, circulation and parking. cj The project will be de'veloped in a manner to be compatible with surrounding development. d) Internal circulation is acceptable to the City Engineer as shown on the plot plan and by conditions of approval. e) Private recreational facilites are readily accessible. f) Dwelling unit density does not exceed the density allowed in the underlying zone (R-1-7500) . CONDITIONS (PUD-10) . ' 1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the Plans submitted labeled Exhibits B &C dated March 3, 1977; ExhibitD , dated Marph 23, 1977; and Exhibit E &F, dated April 6, 1977. The location of ' all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and other facilities or features shall be located substantially as shpwn on Exhibit D,E & F unless otherwise provided herein. . 2) All conditions shall be appropriately completed and the project commenced within 18 months from final City action. 3) In addition to the required details to be shown on the final, PUD plan, the following shall be included: . a) Proper lot numbers in sequence b) 24' minimum driveway width . c) An acceptable redesign of the quest parking area, showing not less than 11 spaces. d) .Fencing plan for the recreational vehicle storage area. 4) Building locations and setbacks shall be shown on the final PUD plan in substantial conformance with Exhibit C, and in no case shall they exceed the provisions of section 21.45.120 No. 13. 5) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant"shall submit 'la'ndscape and irrigation plans to the Director of Parks & Recreation for review and approval. All improvements shall be installed prior to final occupancy. 6) Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular safety shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the. issuance of final occupancy. 7) All utilities shall be placed underground. The C.C&R's for this project shall state that individual, exterior television antennas are not permitted. 8) One-hour fire-resistive construction shall be utilized for all separation walls, floors and ceilings. A separate utility system shall be provided for each dwelling unit. SECTION II: BACKGROUND Location and Description of Property The 2.25 acre parcel is located on the south side of Chestnut between Highland and Adams. The property has approximately 211 feet of frontage on Chestnut and 462 feet of depth. The flat site is currently under cultivation and is adjacent to Other cultivated land. Woodland Way, a cul-de-sac, is located on the north side of Chestnut across the street from the project site. Street improve- ments (curbs, gutters, sidewalks) exist on Chestnut between Highland and Pio Pico. Existing_Zpning: Subject Property: R-l-7500 North: R-l-7500 South: R-l-7500 East: R-l-7500 West: R-l-7500 Existing Land Use; Subject Property: Agriculture North: Single family residential South: Agriculture and SFR's East: Agriculture, PUD West: SFR's History and Related Cases . The property was owned for a number of years by a church group and was planned for development by the group for a church. A Tract Map and Planned Unit Development for six residences was approved for property fronting on Highland Drive (CT 76-8, PUD-2). The parcel is 1.45 acres and the dwelling units constitute 4 dwelling units per acre. The development utilizes a private^street that could at some future date be used for a portion of a through public street-. This previously approved CT & PUD abut the subject site o'n the south east. Environmental Impact Information An Environmental Impact Assessment has been filed 'and the_project . issued a Negative Declaration based on the following findings: 1. The project is within an urbanized area. 2. No significant vegetation-or.landforms exist on the site 3. The existing street systems are capable of handling 'the increases in traffic. General Plan Information. The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site for Residential Low-Medium density. (0-4 dwelling units per acre) . The proposed project provides 4.8 dwelling units per acre. This density is compatible with the General Plan under the following provision in the Land Use Element page 23: EXPLANATORY NOTE ON DENSITY RANGES: The densities established for the low and low-medium density residential classifications . simply designate the maximum number of dwelling units per gross acre that would be permitted if all requirements are met. In those exceptional cases where the base zone is consistent with the land use designation but would permit a slightly h-igher yield than that recommended in the low and low-medium ; density residential classifications, the City may find that the project is consistent with this element if it is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land 'uses and programs expressed herein and does not.exceed twenty five (25) percent the maximum allocation. .'.••' The underlying zoning (R-l-7500) would allow 13 'dwelling units on the square footage of subject parcel. Without the above "25%"provision; the subject parcel would yield 10 dwelling units. * c The Residential Guidelines of the Land Use Element state the following in regard to other than the standard single family detached residences. 1) Retain the present predominance of single-family residences. • "• throughout the community; while providing a variety of housing types in the communities within the City, including townhouses, condominiums, . apartments, mobile homes, modular and prefab- . ricated housing. • 7), Achieve a variety and choice of. housing in all economic ranges throughout the City. 8) Offer safe, healthful, attractive residential areas with a wide range of housing types, styles and price levels in a variety of locations. 9) Encourage cluster-type housing and other innovative housing design.that provides adequate open areas around these developments. Staff- -feels that the propsed residential design (common wall con- dominium residential) achieves a number of positive results. 1) The design of the subdivision allows the property owner to achieve the allowable density under the General Plan. 2) The design allows the site to accommodate adequate provision for future public street systems. • ' 3) The design provides -for an alternative housing type within the area, while main- taining the established density. _ . ' Guideline six of the Residential Guidelines provides for the pre- servation of neighborhood atmosphere and identity in existing residential areas. Staff does not feel that the project design will have a negative impact on the existing neighborhood. Con- -•- ditions of approval will insure Residential Low-Medium density consistency. The- project will be developed with a common architec- tural theme, much like.the Spanish Village project across Chestnut on Spanish Way. .. . • Public Facilities • • . / -At this time, all necessary public facilities, including sewer ( service, are available to serve the subject project as proposed. \^ However, sewer facilities may not be available when applications re made for building permits. If sewer facilities are not avail- able at the time of building permit application, building permits will not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City » .Council can be made, to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will be available prior to occupancy. The site is within the-Carlsbad Unified.School -District. A letter ' frpm the District is on file assuring the City that school physical facilities will be available concurrent with need for this development. Major Planning Considerations Is the request consistent with the General Plan? Does the request meet the intent and purpose and development standards as provided in the PUD section-of the ordinance? SECTION III; DISCUSSION Staff feels that the proposed requests are consistent with the General Plan (See the General Plan section of the background report). Staff considers the proposed project to be in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance under the following categories of Section 21.45.010 2) Encourage imaginative and innovation.al planning of residential neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas by offering a wide variety of dwelling units and building types and site arrange- ments with- well- integrated community facilities and services; 4) Permit greater flexibility in design than is possible through strict application of conventional zoning and subdivision regulation. In addition to the above, staff feels that the proposed project relates well to the surrounding area, as stated in number three. in the above section; because of the provision for future ded- ication for internal block circulation. The following summarizes the development standards in the PUD Ordinance and how these requirements are met by the proposed plan: 1. Density allowed: 5 du per acre (GP - 25% increase permitted) proposed: 4'. 8 2. Yards ' allowed: (structures): 10' min. proposed : 20' allowed: (garages): 25' min. proposed : 70' + 3. Coverage allowed: 40% max. proposed: 2.8% . • • * 4. Height . allowed: 35' max. ' . • . proposed: 27' * • .7 •*•*. 5 . Parking required: 22 covered - 11 guest proposed:. 22 covered - 13 guest 6: Storage Space • • required: 440 Sq.Ft. Min. proposed: 1196 Sq.Ft. . 7. Refuse Areas (5 residences or more/nonresidential) Refuse areas as shown will function adequately. 8. Screening of Parking Area Landscape plan requirement will assure .fulfillment of this condition. -. 9 . Usuable Open Space required: 6600 Sq.Ft. proposed: 9000 Sq.Ft. 10. N/A 11. Landscaping (not used for recreation) Landscape plan requirement will assure fulfillment of this condition. • . 12. Signs (in addition to underlying zone) proposed: Type: Hand Carved Wood Location: On 42' stumpstone wall on Chestnut Height: 3' Size: 2X8, 16 Sq.Ft. 13 . Placement of Buildings . Proposals meets ordinance requirements. 14. Streets Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement. 15. Pedestrian Walkways Proposal meets ordinance requirements. 16. Lighting . ... Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement, 17. Utilities . . * i Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement, .8 • ' 18. Building Construction Requirements: Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement. 19. Planned Unit Development Lots • - • Proposal meets ordinance requirements.. THrar 4/6/77 Exhibits; Location Map CT 77-6, Exhibit A, dated April 5, 1977 PUD-10, Exhibit B, dated March 3, 1977 Exhibit C, dated March 23, 1977. Exhibit D, dated March 23, 1977 Exhibit E, dated April 6, 1977 Exhibit F, dated April 6, 1977. .9 r 500 PUD - 10 CT 77-7 'leqiie/;t:__$^:2X-^ /_ t±:/'A<r Coast Permit Area: I School District;, ^_ \>f-r SanUation District: VUhir. Const Plan Arna: i.\ y\ ;;;V^-<U \l\;&" ; o ^* ^ ?Q I-?tn Qj ;o-o. j City of Carlsbad Planning Commission COPY