Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-06-07; City Council; 5088; Buena Woods Kamar Construction Company# ? i'.;p ; i:GENDA BILL NO. =? DATE: June 7, 1977 OUARTKNT: : / PLANNING SUBJECT: CASE NO: SP-16O/CT 77-2/PUD-8 APPLICANT: C BUENA WOODS, KAMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY STATEMENT OF THE MATTER REQUEST: The subject property is situated between Marron Road and Elm Avenue, on either side of the Monroe extension. * SP-160 was previously approved in 1975 for 135 PUD dwelling units. The applicant now wishes to amend this development to provide more amenities and reduce the number of units to 130. Since the original approval.of SP-160, the P-C Zone has been amended to delete the requirements to the Specific Plan. The PUD processing is now used to approve development of this nature. Therefore the present application is a multi-request to: ‘ 1) Delete S.P-160, 2) approve PUD-8 and 3) approve CT 77-2 In their recommendation the Planning Commission asked the staff to prepare further information for the City Council on the possible traffic problems along Hosp Way and the service road on Monroe. _ This report is attached and contains an additional condition to resolve access problems with.the proposed service road on Monroe. EXHIBITS: i Report to City Manager dated, 5/26/77,\J J? Report to Planning Commission dated, 4/27/77 ' Planning Commission Resolutions: 136%, 136-6, 13617 PUD Exhibit A, dated 4/13/77, Exhibit B, dated,2/2/77, Exhibit C, dated 4/22/77, Exhibit D, dated 5/11/77; and CT Exhibit A, dated 4/13/77. Excerpts from Minutes of May 11, 1977. ' c e RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council direct City Attorney to prepare documents deleting SP-160, and approving PUD-8 and CT 77-2 as per Planning Commission Resolutions: 1365, 1366, 1367, with the additional condition contained in report to the City Manager dated May 26, 1977. Council action 6-y-177 Council referred the matter back to .staff to work out the details as discussed by Council, further, if it constitutes a:sufficient change fron the existin? aoproval, it then be referred back to the ,Planning Commission. FORM PLANNING 73 . F 4 MEMORANDUM f r L : c -- MAY 26, 1977 .+ TO: PAUL BUSSEY, CITY MANAGER k FROM: P&NING DEPARTMENT L SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT ON BUENA WOODS 3-4. At the Planning Commission hearing on Buena Woods 3-4 (PUD-8 and CT 77-2) on May 11, 1977, concern was expressed regarding two aspects of the proposed project. The Commission directed staff to discuss these two items as an addendum to'their report to the City Council. The first area of concern had to do with the design of the proposed frontage road on the west side of Monroe Street. A recently approved PUD, Carlsbad Palisades, had originally pro- posed a frontage road along Tamarack Avenue. Because of specific design problems with that proposal, staff had recommended denial. The Planning Commission questioned if the proposed frontage road in Buena Woods 3-4 had similar problems. To answer simply, no it does,.not. The following ia an itemized comparison of the design of the two frontage roads: Carlsbad Palisades Buena Woods 3-4 1. Lack of sidewalks and frontage road design would cause ped- estrian/bicycle/vehicle con- flicts, Sidewalks and bike path along Monroe', adequate design section of frontage road, and pedestrian path through park area to the west minimizes conflicts. 2, 3. 4. 5. 10% grade along Tamarack & 2~5% grade along Monroe & frontage road. frontage road. No parking provided along frontage road. No physical separation pro- vided between Tamarack & frontage road. Design and one-way flow Design provides adequate restricted proper access .access to service vehicles to fire and trash vehicles, in both directions. 25 guest parking spaces provided along frontage road for 16 units. Distance (15'-22'), curb, andlandscaped berm or wall separation between Marron & frontage road. The onl; design aspects of k-he proposed frontage road that need to be modified are the geometries of the two intersections' ' t with Monroe Street. The City's traffic engineer has reviewed t the project and assures us that the proper design can be pro- vided within the two areas. The applicant has concurred ver- i bally to the addition of the following condition to the PUD: i "The design of the private streets to provide safe ingress and egress shall L be as approved by the City Engineer." The other area of concern of the Planning Commission had to do ; with the potential traffic and associated noise problems along i Hosp Way if it connects through to El Camino Real prior to I the extension of either Elm Avenue or Monroe Street. A recommended ! condition-of-approval of this tentative map requires the through connection of Hosp Way in conjunction with phase 3 of this dev- i elopment . It should also be noted that prior commitments of the I developer requires the connection of Hosp Way to Monroe Street concurrent with the next phase of Grove Apartments. The extension of Monroe Street to Marron Road is not a condition-of-approval for this project or any other project pending at this time. It is anticipated that the extension of Elm Avenue will not occur until at least 1980, maybe later, If the present sewer moratorium was not a consideration, it is very likely Hosp Way would connect to El Camino Real prior to the extension of Elm Avenue or Monroe Street. What effect the moratorium will have is unknown. However, if the connection of Hosp Way was to be made first, staff predicts the following impacts might occur. Hosp Way would carry all of the traffic generated by the residences along its right-of-way. It would also carry a percentage of traffic generaged by development'within the approximate geographical area north of Chestnut Avenue and east of Interstate 5. The traffic engineer has estimated a short range traffic projection of 5,000 ADT (average daily traffic) and a long-range, maximum ADT of 10,000 vehicles along Hosp Way without Elm or Monroe being extended. He assures us that the design'section of Hosp Way is adequate to handle this projected traffic, but at a l&s than desirable level of service. We have also plugged these traffic projections and other data into a formula developed by the Comprehensive Planning Organization to estimate the potential noise impacts on the adjoining residences. The following assumptions and projections were made: Assumptions: Hosp Way between Monroe Street and El Camino Real. 1. Two lanes (60' ROW) = 5,000 to 10,000 i: Ezrage hourly flow (AH!?)! Day=363 to 725 Night=54 to 108 4. Percent truck traffic = 4% 5. Year of interest=1973, -2- z ‘lr 4 6. Highway classification=City collector street 7. Vehicle speed=35 MPH r J I 8. Design speed for collector street=30 MPH EquiualenC Naiaa LQVQ~ (Leq- 1 in dB at 50’ d Day 363 AHF = 62 dB 725 AHF = 65 dB Night 54 AHF = 56 dB 108 AHF = 57 dB The existing residences to the south are at least 140 feet from the future Hosp Way. The proposed residences within Buena Woods 3-4 are approximately 25 feet or more from Hosp Way. The homes to the south would not be significantly impacted by noise even at the maximum level of traffic. The 17 homes in Buena Woods 3-4 that side along Hosp Way might be marginally impacted in the maximum case. However, recent State Law requires adequate sound insulation and the maximum case is not actually expected to be reached. It would be several years before the maximum would be reached and either Elm or Monroe would probably be put through by that time. As an example, existing Chestnut - Avenue, the only straight connection to El Camino Real at this time, carries less than 7,000 ADT. MZc&r 5/26/77 -3- ‘, .-’ $- .,* -: . ti ’ I J STAFF REPORT * t / ' J * - I DATE: ' Y APRIL 27, 1,977 A -.. TO: 'PLANNING COMMISSION P .,Y / il P i * FROM: .-' PLANNING DEPARTMENT b CASE NO: PUD-8/CT 77-2/SP-160 1 APPLICANT: KAkR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY c- REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND TRACT MAP TO PROVIDE 130 DrcJELLING UNITS ON 43.9 ACRES AND DELETION OF AN EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE SAME AREA. SECTION I. RECOMMENDATION the Staff recommends APPROVAL of PUD-8, CT 77-2 and SP-160 based on following findings and subject to the following conditions: FINDINGS (PUD-8) 1. The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community because: 2. 3. --. _ __ . a) The development will allow the subject property to be developed to its allowable potential and density. J The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general - welfare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity or in- jurious to property or improvements in the vicinity because: a) The proposed PUD is consistent with the approved Master Plan for the area; and b) The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner consistent with the anticipated future density in the area. The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 and all minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.120 will be met because: ‘a) b) cl d) The proposed cluster-type of development and open-space areas will minimize grading and removal of trees. The grouping of units and private streets provides for usable recreation area, preserves trees and reduces need for grading. The proposed landscaping program as required by PUD will i retain the existing.character of the grove and minimize j the need for extensive irrigation systems. I c The design of the development will be compatible with E surrounding development which is also developed as in a . PUD manner or apartments. . 1 I - . . . “‘1 ;’ ‘ I . f 4.; The'grantin 63 .’ f this permit will not ac a? rsely affect and will L be consistent with the General Plan for the City, applicable T 4 specific plans, because: * and the adopted plans of any governmental agyncy I a)- The proposal is consistent with the applicable portions of the Land Use, Circulation, Parks and Recreation, and Open Space Elements of the General Plan. 2 b) The present Specific Plan will be deleted and replaced by , this PUD. .. ,- cl No plans of any other governmental agency are affected by . this proposal. CONDITIONS (PUD-8) 1.' The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the plans submitted labeled Exhibits A, dated April 13, 1977, Exhibit B, dated February 2, 19% and Exhibit C, dated April 22, 1977, The location of ali roadways, parking areas,landscaping and other facilities or features shall be located substantially as shown on Exhibit A unless otherwise provided herein. 2. All conditions shall be appropriately completed and the project commenced within 18 months from final City action. 3. In addition to the required details to be shown on the final PUD plan, the following shall be included: a) The units along the east side of Monroe Street shall be set back a minimum of 30' from the right-of-way and 10' from the top of a cut bank. An alternative to this condition would be the installation of a 6' high sound attenuation wall along .a the top of bank adjacent to the east side of Monroe Street. The design of said wall shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. b) Proper lot numbers in sequence. cl ' No tree symbols d) A lighter topographic base (Exhibit A of CT 77-2, dated April 13, 1977, will satisfy this requirement). 4 Approved phasing. f) Elimination of grading and the words, "TO Retain Natural" within the City park area. 9) The removal of the recreational vehicle storage area shown on the south side of Hosp Way. This areA shall be relocated as approved by the Planning Director. h) Paths th raugh the public and private open space areas as required by the Parks and Recreation Director. 1) Fencing and screening plan for the recreational vehicle 1 , as. d r- 1 ' j> back a minimum of 25' the private drives. - l f 4 k) All pertinent dimensiGns. 4. L P 5. 6. 7. 8. E I i i 1) Final plans shall be drawn on 24" X 36" sheets. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department and shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Director'for all &!&i/ a&es C' 4er or grea 4.n l-dgl-k and any oth& areas required by thq City prior to issuance of a grading permit, or if no grading permit is required, prior to issuance of building permits. This plan shall incorporate acceptable drought resistantplantmaterials and acceptable water conserving irrigation systems. All inprovenents shallbe installledpriorto finaloccupancy. 1 i Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular safety shall be t provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the I issuance of final occupancy,. 1 All utilities shall be placed underground. The C.C&R's for this I project shall state that individual, exterior television .antennas are not permitted. One-hour fire-resistive construction shall be utilized for all separation walls. A separate utility system shall be provided for each dwelling unit. All of the applicable mitigation measures as identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR-115(A) for this protect shall be 4 b) cl d) e) f) implemented as follo&; The applicant shall provide a letter from the North County Transit District as to whether or not bus service will i eventually be routed through this development. If bus service is to be provided, the applicant shall make whatever -[ on-site improvements are required-by the City .Engineer. i Homes that will be impacted'by the expected noise levels generated by Monroe Street traffic shall be properly insulated and buffered as required by state and local laws. I F Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall ; provide a report from an accoustical engineer suggesting pro- f visions that would protect homes from noise generated by the expected traffic'along Monroe Street when it connects to 2 i; Marron Road. The Planning Director may include any of the provisions that he feels are feasible as conditions of the building permits. All existing City policies and ordinances for resource con- servation at time of development shall be utilized in this project. Only low-volume flush toilets shall be used. Vapor metal .and fluorescent lights shall be used wherever determined feasible by the City Engineer. Any future swimming pools within this project shall be solar heated. Plans with calcualtions as to the effectiveness of the system shall be submitted to the Building Director prior to any building permits.. I L f f1 0, i 1- FINDINGS (CT 77-2) 1. F 4 The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because: a) The Land Use Plan designates the subject site for Medium-Density Residential (d-10 dwelling units per g-ross acre) and Open Space. The subject project will provide approximately 6 dwelling units.per gross acre and open L b) P- cl , 2. . 3. 4. 5. dl d space areas consistent with the Land Use Plan. L Monroe Street.shall be further extended as“a secondary arterial as shown in the Circulation Element. Park land shall be dedicated as shown in the Parks and Recreation Element. Open Space shall be preserved as shown in the Open Space Element. Refer to finding No. 10 for discussion of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con- sistent with the General Plan because: a) The project will provide orderly residential development; and b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public facilities and/or expense to the taxpayer. P The site is physically suitable for the type of development because: a. The proposed cluster-type of development and open space areas will minimize grading and removal of trees; b. The proposed development will not affect any unusual topographic or geologic features'on the site; and c. No significant natural vegetation exists on the site. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because: a) Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the allowable maximum. The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or sub- stantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because: a) All potential environmental impacts have been addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report and all pertinent mitigation measures! suggested in said report, have been imposed as conditions of approval. Satisfaction of those conditions will mitigate the potential of any significant environmental impacts. A I 6. 4 7, I 8. - 9, 10. . . 1. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because: a) .Conditions of approval will insure the above. .- The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with the easements required by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed sub- division because:. a) Conditions of approval will insure the above. The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines or shorelines because: a) The subdivision does not front on any of the above. The subject application has complied with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordiance of 1972 because: a. An Environmental Impact Report has been certified for this project. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with applicable City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because: a) The Planning Commission finds that sewer service is not available for this development as of the date of this approval. However, sewer service may be available in the future. The Planning Commission will by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this Tentative Subdivision Map approval, insure that the final map will not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. In addition, the Planning Commission will add a condition that a note be placed on the final map providing that building permit may net issue for lots in the subdivision unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available. Since the final map cannot be approved unless sewer service is available and building cannotYoccur within the subdivision unless sewer service remains available, the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements ..of the public facilities element of the General Plan have'been met insofar as they'apply to this Tentative Subdivision Map approval. CONDITIONS (CT 77-2) The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto and as shown on the plot plan sub- mitted labeled Exhibit A, dated April 13, 1977. 2.a) This subdivision is approved on the express condition that that the final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that sewer service is available.to serve the subdivision. t - . . cl 3. 4. This subdivi%ion is approved upon that building permits will not be condition issued for development on the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application ' for such permit and will continue to be available until kime af accupancy. If the City Engineer determines that ;- a) .b) cl d) 4 f) 9) h) sewer facilities are not applicable, building permits will not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council, can be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will be available prior to occupancy. This condition shall be noted on the final map. . This Tentative Subdivision Map shall be subject to any further approvals as may be necessary in connection with such plan for the allocation of sewer service among competing uses as the City Council may adopt. If an allocation plan is adopted prior to final map approval, the applicant shall satisfy the requirements of such plan as a further condition of this Tentative Subdivision Map approval. Lot #132 shall be dedicated to the City in conjunction with Unit # 1 Lot #145 shall be dedicated to the City in con- junctionnith Unit. # 4 The dedication of these lots shall satisfy all of the require:ents of Ordinance tf9190. All Of the applicable mitigation measures as identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR-115(A) for this report shall be implemented as follows: Required with grading permits: > During grading and construction, all waste chemicals, especially lubricants, paints and fuels, shall be properly contained and transported off the site where they can be recycled or destroyed. All facilities, such as storm drains, energy dissipators and desiltation basins, necessary to prevent adverse impacts from project runoff shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer- c . Grading shall be limited to the minimum area necessary to accomplish the development, Clearing operations shall not'be initiated in advance of , grading. ! . Grading activities shall be coordinated with the local precipitation pattern. Drainage facilities shall be constructed concurrent with grading activitie.s as required by.the City Engineer. Final surface shall be watered and rolled to form a hardened, compacted.cap of soil to minimize dust and erosion due to surface. Surface shall be graded so as tb direct runoff toward planned drainages and, if possible, away from cut and fill 7 I.. ^- _ 1 4 . . 3). k.) - _ 1.1 5, 6. 1. Construction activities shall only take place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. n) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall cause to have conducted a systematic posthole test, production of a surface map, and the preparation of 'a report. This work shall be done by a recognized archae- ological organization to determine if additional steps are necessary to preserve the archaeological resources of the site. The organization shall submit a report to the Planning Director setting forth its findings. Based on the report's findings, the Planning Director may consider the imposition of additional conditions deemed necessary in view of the archaeological report. Required with improvement plans: d) Bike lanes and/or paths shall be provided as required by City Council policy. P) HOSP Way shall be improved and connected to El Camino Real prior to, or concurrent with the recordation of Phase $3 of this subdivision. All of the pathways required in the final PUD plan shall be improved as required by the Parks and Recreation Director and City Engineer. r for slope ained per the Recreation Director. ,-- erosion co I' shall be planted OL the.Parks and . The applicant and the City, when considering grading and ' improvement plans, shall strive to preserve as many mature eucalyptus trees as possible. Said plans a-w shew me location and size of'lall trees to be removed. Construction and grading equipment shall only be serviced and washed at locations adequately equipped to dispose of wastes, Standard grading practices, shall be used. such as watering for dust control, An open space easement shall be granted to the City for each of the common open space lots. The open space ease- ment for lot #131, in the area between lots #120 & 121, shall.provide for public access. FINDINGS (SP-160 > The proposed Specific Plan Amendment deleting SP-160 entirely is consistent with all applicable City policies and ordinances because: '. #( a’) The entire developm&nt.area has been superceded by the approval of a Planned Unit Development permit (PUD-8) as provided for in the Car&bad Municipal Code. 07' . e ‘8 i I ,- ,j CONDITIONS (SP-160 -.: ,' NONE NECESSARY , -& SECTION II, BACKGROUND c Location and Description of the Property The 43.9 acres of land lies within the forested area known as Hosp 'Grove. The site is directly north of Buena Woods' first phase of development at the northeast intersection of Elm Avenue and Monroe Street. ---. ._ 1 The elevation of the site varies from approximately 200 feet along the east and west sides of the property down to approximately 50 e feet where the Monroe Street extension crosses the northerly property line. Near the center of the site, there is an eroded arroyo! some&es referred to as a natural amphitheater. * - Existing Zoning: Subject Property: North: East: South: Existing Land Use .West: Subject Property: Vacant eucalyptus grove North: Vacant eucalyptus grove East: SFR's and water tank South: Condo's (Buena Woods) West: SFR's P-C P-C R-A-10,000 P-C R-l History and Related Cases A zone change (ZC-3) from R-A-10,000 to P-C was approved on March 3, 1970 (Ordinance No. 9250). A Master Plan (MP-1) for 163 acres, encompassing the proposed site, was approved on March 3, 1970 (Resolution No. 1694). A Specific Plan (SP-32) and Tentative Map (CT-72-11) for the first phase of the Buena Woods development was approved in July, 1972. This first phase is now built and occupied. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR-115) covering this area was certified by the City on May 15, 1973. A Specific Plan (SP-160) and Tentative Map (CT 74-13) were approved on December 3, 1974. These earlier actions approved 135 units, in configurations ranging from a single unit to four attached units, on 43.2 acres. Two extensions to the tract map have been approved and the current map will expire on December 3, 1977. Environmental Impact Information The proposed project is basically the same as that previously approved. Only the co:lfiguration of the units has been changed arid additional recreational facilities have been provided. The reason a 'new EIR is being prepared is to supplement the original - EIR with more specific information and to provide for the new process (Planned Unit Development) being utilized by the applicant. The new EIR is to be considered independently of the original EIR and must be certified prior to consideration of the PUD and tract -w- .I . v’ E i c l General Plan Information 0. 7 4 -., The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site as Open Spa& and Medium Density Residential as shown below: . . 1 -4 The proposed development drawn in Land Use Plan Map style, would look as follows: 9 The applicant is providing 22.1 acres of openspace, generally as . shown on the Land Use Map. The only questionable area is'west of the Monroe Street extension. The proposal shows 16 units immediately ‘on the west side of Monroe Street. The.General Plan shows.open space. The adopted Master Plan does show units in this area. The proposal shows 130 units on 12.8 acres of private lot area, resulting in a net density of 10.2 dwelling units per acre. The Land Use Map allocates a gross density of 4-10 dwelling units per acre. By including the proposed street areas of 9 acres, the effective gross density of the proposal is 6 dwelling units per acre. . The proposed extension of Monroe Street as a secondary arterial is consistent with the Circulation Element. The proposed park dedication areas are consistent with the Parks and Recreation Element and the Open Space Element. Public,Facilities At this time, all necessary public facilities, including sewer s&vice, are available to serve the subject project as proposed. tiowever , sewer facilities may not be available when applications are made for building permits. If sewer facilities are not available . *lO -.., ,.? s ~ 4 i 9 .- e : ‘; 0 .’ at the time of building permit application, building permits will 7 not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council A can be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will. / be available prior to occupancy. The site is within the Carlsbad Unified School District. A letter from the District is on file assuring the City that school physical facilities will be available concurrent with need for this develop- ment. This development is also providing for the dedication of substantial acreage for park purposes. The linear park along the west side of 'Monroe will be improved with a path and will eventually provide a r=. --I link between Elm Avenue and Buena Vista Lagoon. The arroyo area will provide a natural amphitheater for special functions. Major Planning Considerations 1) Is the request consistent with the General Plan? 2) Does the request meet the intent and purpose and development standards as provided in Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municpal Code? SECTION III. DISCUSSION 1. Staff feels that the proposed requests are consistent with the General Plan (see the General Plan section of the background report). The only question arose in comparing the proposed development to the Land Use Plan.map. The Land Use Plan shows Open Space along the westerly side of Monroe Street whereas the proposed development shows a total of 16 dwelling units immediately adjacent to the westerly, Monroe Street right-of- way. However, the intent of the General Plan Map is to show the general outlines of various land use allocations. The boundaries are not intended to be precise, and a reasonable transition of uses is not precluded by the plan map boundaries. The adopted Master Plan and current Specific Plan for the area does show development on the west side of Monroe Street. 2. Staff considers the proposed project to be in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance i-e 'under the following categories of Section 21.45.010: 2) Encourage imaginative and innovational planning of residential I neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas by offering a wide variety of dwelling units and building types and site arrangements with well-integrated community facilities and services; 4) Permit greater flexibility in design than in possible through strict application of conventional zoning and subdivision regulation. ~ Staff does have concerns about some of the design features of the proposal. These concerns and staff's comments are as follows: .11 . *. ** . ( -1 1 ;’ L I i " a) R Bb. rding the 16 units on th a' est side of Monroe Street and the 3 units on the east side of Hosp Way: The I t optimum Situation for this type of development wouJ,d be, t0 have all of the units within the area bounded by Hasp Way and Monroe Street. This would afford each of the future residents easy access to the recreational amenities' without having to cross any major public streets. Also, the park area on the west side of Monroe Street and the open space area along the south an-d east side of Hosp Way would have a more pleasing visual impact sn trauelcrs along these streets if the views were not interrupted by dwelling units. However, the Master Plan and the current Specific Plan for this development was approved by the City. showing development in these areas. b) Regarding the units backing up to the easterly right- of-way of Monroe Stree: . Because of the cut required to improve Monroe Street through this property and the height of the units backing up to Monroe Street, and adverse visual impact on the traveling public along Monroe Street would occur if the development occured as presently proposed. Also, the expected future traffic along Monroe Street would have a significant adverse effect on the residents of those units. Staff has recommended a condition that would.require the affected units to be set back 30 feet from the Monroe Street right-of-way . or allow the setbacks as shown (minimum of approximately 22') if the developer installs a 6' high sound attenuation wall along the top of bank adjacent to the east side of Monroe Street. ' Also, staff considers the proposed.project to be in conformance with the regulations of the Planned Community Zone set forth in Section 21.38.150(3) as follows: The undeveloped portion of the approved Master Plan contai,nb InOre than 100 acres. The density and other provisions of the Master . Plan have been met with this PUD request. If the City Council determines it necessary for proper development to occur, they may deny the PUD request and require an amendment to the existing Master Plan to bring it into accord with the provisions of the Planned Community Zone. - Staff believes that a PUD is the proper method to develop the property. A PUD provides for the inovative design necessary in this area. ~1~0 much of the Master Plan area is already developed and an amended Master Plan would not add significantly to the project. . .a ---‘,’ , _- . _‘. : *12 . . . . . -.‘I. ,’ . i * e; 0 . _ * t The following summarizes the development standards in the PUD d Ordinance and how these requirements are met by the proposed plan: - . .I . 1. Density .- 2. c 3. 4. Height l 5. . -6. . : 7. 8. 9. allowed: 4-10 du's/acre (MP=140 du's) Proposed: 6 du's/acre (130 du's proposed) Yards allowed (structures): 10' min. proposed: 10' allowed (garages) : 25' min. proposed : .20' (conditions-of-approval require 25') Coverage allowed: No minimum P-C Zone proposed: 16% allowed: No maximum in P-C Zone proposed: 31' max. above grade Parking residential : required: 325 spaces (195+130 guest spaces) proposed: 398 spaces (260 + 138 guest spaces rot .: including on-street parking). l ’ Storage Space required: 5200 sq.ft. proposed: 8000 sq.ft. (2-4000 sq.ft. areas) Refuse Areas Individual-unit trash containers are proposed. Staff feels this is appropriate because of the individual character of the units. '% Screening of Parking Area Landscape plan requirement will assure fulfillment of this condition. Usuable Open Space requireJ: 1.2 acres proposed: '9.4 acres of.common area includes .38 acres of active recreational area (tennis courts and cabana) and more than the required 1.2 acres- are improved with pedestrian pathways and view areas. 11. 12. 13. . 14. 15. 16. Lighting 17. Open Space (Non-residential) .N/i Landscaping-(not used for recreation) Project site is currently plenished with groves of mature eucalyptus trees. As many trees as possible will remain. Therefore, a low.maintenance landscaping concept will be empha- sized with erosion control landscaping on manufacturing cut and fill banks as approved by the required landscape and irrigation plan. Signs Tyge: Wood, Height: 48" Location- mter-t~~n~f~~~~?~~e~~pway. Size: 3'6" X 10' (35 sq.it\ Placement of Buildings Proposal meets ordinance requirements as follows: A TO' min. between units. : . . B 5' min, between accessory structures C 10' min. between wings of a building. D All but 2 units are of a 2-unit attached configuration. E, All units along the east side of Monroe Stree are required to be setback from the R.O.W. a min. of 30' and from the top * ' ofabankamin. of 10Funless an alternative of a sound attenuation wall is provided. Streets Two-way private drives, no parking either side: required: 24' provided: 24' Pedestrian Walkways Conditions of'approval will assure.fulfillment of this requirement. Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement. Utilities Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement. *14 , * * c : t*. t .- 0. . 18., Building Construction Requirements t A.. , Conditions of apprbval will assure fulfillment of this requirement. 19. Planned Unit Development Lots Proposal meets ordinance requirements. _-._- Attachments: . . m Location Map PUD: Exhibit A, dated d/13/77. Exhibit B, dated 2/2/77 Exhibit C, dated 4/22/V CT : Exhibit A, dated 4/13/77 MZ:ar 4/20/77 f . .,: .15 . . ih2ssor book: +5., %ge: General P7a.n Ldbh'e Description: 090 Exist Acres schoo 2 3 4 . 5 . ,6 7 8 9 . 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 i8 19 I 20 21 22 .23 24 25 '26 z7 28 0 a,- . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTI6N NO. 1365 ’ ‘ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO DELETE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 160 ON 43.9 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOSP WAY ADJACENT TO MONROE ROAD. CASE NO.: SP-16 0 APPLICANT: KAMAR CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, a verified application for deletion of Specific . Plan on property, to wit: Those portions of Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 27 and of Canon Street in Hosp Eucalyptus Forest Co.'s - Tract No. 1 in the City of Carlsbad, County of' San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof 1136 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 8, 1908, described in Assessor's Book 156, Page 090, Parcels 36, 37. 38 and 39 and.more particularly described in the files of the City of Carlshad Planning Department has been filed with the City cf Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by the "Carlsbad Municipal Code;" and . . WHEXEZS, the.public hearing to consider the subject request was held on May 11, i977, at the time and in the place specified in the public hearing notice, pursuant to the provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal-Code; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considerin the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons .who desired to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to this requestand found the following facts and reasons to exist: -. 1) The proposed Specifi~,.~.Ean.-.Amendment deleting SP-160 entirely is consistent with~.~i-~.-.aPPYicable City policies and ordinances - because: 1 \ 2 3 4 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 18 19 22 ": 24 25 26 '27 *' 28 a). The entire development area has been superceded by the .- approval of a Planned Unit Development permit (PUD-8) as provided for in the Carlsbad Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning 'Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That in view of the findings heretofore made and considering the applicable law; the decision of the Planning Commission is to delete Specific Plan 160, subject to the following conditions: a) None necessary. . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on May 11, 1977 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Larson, Nelson, Fikes, Jose - Watson and L'Heureux ABSENT: Commissioner. Rombotis , . ATTEST: . . . . w 5 6 7 8 - 9 10 11 12 . 13 14 . 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 .23 24 25 26 27 28 * Wit: b’ . ’ -0 I r PLANNING COMMISSION'RESOLUTION NO. 1366 BESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE .- CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TRACT MAP TO PROVIDE 130 DWELLING UNITS ON 43.9 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOSP WAY ADJACENT TO MONROE ROAD,. CASE NO: CT 77-2 APPLICANT: KAMAR CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property, to Those portions bf Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, and 27 and of Canon Street in BasP Eucalyptus Forest Co-Is Tract No. 1 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to _ Map thereof 1136 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 8, 1908, described in Assessor's Book 156, Page 090, Parcels 36, 37 38 and 39 and more particularly described inthe files of the City of Carlsbad Planning Department has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, and . WHFZEAS, said application constitutqs a request as provided by the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"' and WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the subject request was held on May 11, 1977, at the time and in the place specified in the public hearing notice, pursuant to the provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and " WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considerin the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the 9 . Tentative Tract Map request (CT 77-2) and found the following facts . and reasons to exist: 1) The proposed map is consistent-with the General Plan because: a) The Land Use Plan designates the subject site-for Medium-Density Rebidential (4-10 dwelling units per gross acre) and Open Space. The subject project will provide approximately six.dwelling units per gross acre and open space areas consistent with the Land Use Plan. n ./Ar A L/Y Au . , /I -I *-/ , b, d d) e) a . Monroe Street shall be further extended as a secondary arterial as shown in the Circulation Element. Park land shall be dedicated as shown in the Parks and . Wweation Element, Open Space shall be preserved as shown in the Open Space Element. _ Refer to finding No.. 10 for discussion of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan.. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con- sistent with the General Plan because: a) The project will provide orderly residential dev$opment; and b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public facilities and/or expense to the'taxpayer, The site is physically suitable for the type of development because: - a) The proposed cluster-type of development and open space areas will minimize grading and removal of trees; b) The proposed development*wili not effect any unusual topographic or geologic features on the site; and cl No significant natural vegetation exists on the site. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of . development because: a) Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the allow- able maximum. The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements are not likely to cause.substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because: a) All potential environmental impacts have been addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report and all pertinent mitigation measures, suggested in said report, have been imposed as conditions of approval. Satisfaction of those conditions will mitigate the potential of any significant environmental impacts. - . 6) The design of the s@division or the.type of improvements are IlOt likely to cause serious public health problems because: a) Conditions of approval will insure the above. \ I * * L 1 2 3 - 4 - 5 '6 7 8 -9 10 11 12 l '13 14 - 15 is 17 18 19 20 . 21 22 23 24 25 . 26 -27 28 71 8) 9) . The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements'will not conflict with the easements required by the public at large for access through or use of property within the-pro- posed subdivision because: a) Conditions of approval will insure the above. The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines or shorelines because: a) The subdivision does not front on any of the above. The subject application has' complied with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 because: a) An Environmental Impact Report has been certified for this project. . 10) The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with applicable City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because: a) The Planning Commission finds that sewer service is not available for this development as of the date of this approval. However, sewer service may be available in the future, The Planning Commission will by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this Tentative Subdivision Map approval, insure that the final map will not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. In addition, the Planning Commission will add a condition that a note be, placed on the final map providing that building permit may not be issued for lots in the subdivision unless the' City.Engineer determines that sewer service is available. Since the final map cannot be Approved unless sewer service is available and building cannot occur within the subdivision unless sewer service remains available,. the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the' public facilities element of the General Plan' have been met insofar as they apply to this Tentative Subdivision Map approval. _.-. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 6) That in view of the findings heretofore made and considering the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commission is'to approve CT.77-2, subject to the following conditions: . xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx . . 4 \' .' '. . . '- . 2 3 4 e 5 6 rl 8 - 9 10 11 iz . . 13 14 15 ; .- 16 i7 18 19 20 21 22 . . 23 '24 25 -26 - 27 2% 1) 2) 3) 4) 0 * . 0 0 . The approval is granted for the land described in the 1 i application ‘and any attachments thereto and as shown on the plot plan submitted labeled Exhibit A, dated April 13-i 1977. a) This subdivision is approved on the express condition that. the final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision. b) This subdivision is approved upon the express condition that building or grading permits will not be issued for development on the Wbject property unless the City Enginee determines that Sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such permit and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. If the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are not applicable, building permits will not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council, can be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will be available prior to occupancy. This condition shall be noted on the final ==P- cl This Tentative Subdivision Map shall be subject to any further approvals as may be necessary in connection with such plan for the allocation of sewer service among competing uses as the City Council may adopt. If an allocation plan is adopted prior to final map approval, the applicant shall satisfy 'the requirements of such plan as a further condition of this Tentative Subdivision Map approval. Lot No. 112 shall be dedicated to the City in conjunction with Unit No. I Lot No. 145 shall be dedicated to the City in conjunction with onit No. 4. . The dedication of these lots shall. satisfy all of the requirements of Ordinance No. 9190. All of the applicable mitiyation measures as identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR-115(A) for this report shall be implemented as follows: L dequired With Grading Permits: al During grading and construction, all waste chemicals, especially lubricants, paints and fuels, shall be properly contained and transported off the site where they can be recycled or destroyed. b) This subdivision is approved upon the express condition that building or grading permits will not be issued for develonment until all facilities, such as storm drains, L energy dissipators and desiltatibn basins, necessary to prevent adverse impacts from project runoff shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. cl . Grading shall be limited to the minimum area necessary to accomplish the development. 4 .! -A- _ , .. t . c . -’ , L . 3 2 .a 4 a c . 6 1C 11 iz . * 12 14 16 i7 18 19 20 . . ’ 21 22 .23 24 25 26 . 2’1 28 d) -_ . e) f 1 9) h) i) 3 W 1) ml n) . . Q) PI L . . 0 . -.. Clearing operations shall not be initiated in advance of grading. Grading activities shall be coordinated with the local p~fq#wn pattern I Drainage facilities shall be constructed concurrent with grading activities as required by the City Engineer. Final surface shall be watered and rolled to form a hardened, compacted cap of soil to minimize dust and erosion due to surface. Surface shall be graded so as to direct runoff toward planned drainages, and, if possible, away from cut and fill slopes. . Ground cover for slope erosion control shall be. planted and maintained per the requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director. The applicant and the City, improvement plans, when considering grading and shall strive to preserve as many mature eucalyptus trees as possible, Said plans skall show the location and size of. all trees to be removed. ' Construction and grading equipment shall only be serviced and washed at locations adequately equipped to dispose of wastes. Standard grading practices, control, such as watering for dust shall be used. Construction activities shall only take place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall cause to have conducted a systematic posthole test, productions'of a service map, 'report. and the preparation of a This work shall be done by a recognized archae- ological organization to determine if additional steps are necessary to preserve the archaeological resources of the site. The organization shall submit a report to the Planning Director setting forth its findings. Based on the report's findings, the Planning Director may conside the imposition of additional considerations deemed necessar in view of the archaeological report: Required With Improvement Plans: Bike lanes and/or paths shall be.provided as required by City Council policy, Hosp Way shall be improved and connected to El Camino Real Prior. to, or concurrent with, the recordation of Phase No. 3 of this subdivisiqn. * \ !. c l , l . m 3 4 a 5 6 7 -- s 1C LJ li . . . 12 14 ,lf .= 1t 1E 26 , 2( . 23 2: 2c - 27 21 i. All of.the pathways required in the final PUD plan shall be .improved 5s required by the Parks and Recreation Director and City Engineer. i. An open space easement shall be granted to the City for each of the common open space lots. The open space easement for lot No. 131, in the area between lots Nos. 120 and 121, shall provide for public access. 1. Prior to the approval of the final map, the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R's) to be recorded with this subdivision to the Planning Director for his review. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the :ity of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on March 8, 1977, by :he following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Fikes, Jose, Watson; L'Heureux NOES: Commissioners Larson, Nelson ABSENT: Commissioner Rombotis ATTEST: . , . . . c 1. 2 3 4 5 6 il 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 , PIiANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1367 kf54b~~~~aM 69 5453 MAMMIMI! ~aum29a~ a9 FM! CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR 130 DWELLING UNITS ON 43.9 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOSP WgEAD$CENT TO MONROE ROAD. . APPLICA& PUD-8 KAMAR CONSTRUCTION WHEFWG, a verified 'application for a certain property, I to wit: Those portions of Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, and 27 and of Canon Street in Hosp Eucalyptus Forest Co.'s Tract No. 1 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof 1136 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 8, 1908, described in Assessor's Book 156, Page 090, Parcels 36, 37, 38 and 39 and more particularly described in the files of the~City of Carlsbad Planning Department- has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request . as provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was held at the time and in . the place specified in said notice on May 11, 1977; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and con- sidering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who --- . desired to be heard, -said Commission considered all factors . -- relating to the Planned Unit Development and found the following facts and reasons to‘exist: 1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and. desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community because: a) The development will allow the subject property to be developed to its allowable potential and density. xxxxxxxxx , . ,'I . I 'a 4 i 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I13 . 14 15 T 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 5) of . The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or'gen-' era1 welfare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property,or improvements in the vicinity because: a) .The proposed PUD is consistent with the approved Master Plan for the area; and b) The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner consistent with the anticipated future density in the area. The design criteria set -forth in Section 21.45.110 and all minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.120 will be met because: a) The proposed cluster-type of development and open space areas will minimize grading and removal of trees. b ) The grouping of units and private streets provides for usable recreation area, preserves trees and reduces need for grading. cl The prcposed landscaping program as required by PUD will retain the existing character of the grove and minimize the need for extensive irrigation systems, d) The design of the development will be compatible with surrounding development which is also developed as in a PUD manner or apartments. The granting of this permit will not adversely effect and will be consistent with the General Plan for the City, applicable specific plans, and the adopted plans of any governmental agency because: a) The proposal is consistent with the applicable portions of the Land Use, Circulation/Parks and Recreation and Open Space Elements of the General Plan. b) The present Specific Plan will be deleted and replaced by - this PUD. e --- . c), No plans of any other governmental agency are effected by this proposal. The subject application has complied with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 ,because: a) An Environmental Impact Report has been certified for this project. .NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning-Commission . the City of Carlsbad as follows: - 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 x2 13 . 14 15 -. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2s 27 28 , A) B) 1) 2) That the above recitations are true and correct. . That in view of the findings heretofore made and considering the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commission is to approve PUD-8, subject to the following conditions: The approval is granted for the land described in the appli- cation and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the plans submitted labeled Exhibit A, dated April 13, 1977, Exhibit B, dated February 2, 1977, Exhibit C dated April 22, 1977, and Exhibit D dated May 11, 1977. The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and other facilities or features shall be located substantitally as shown on Exhibit A unless otherwise provided herein. In addition to the required details to be shown on the final PUD a) b) cl d) e) f) 9). h) i) j) W 1) plan, the following shall be included: The units along the east side of Monroe Street shall be set back a minimum of 30' from the right-of-way and 10' from the top of a cut bank, An alternative to this condition would be the installation of a 6' high sound attenuation wall alony the top of bank adjacent to the east side of Monroe Street. The design of said wall shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Proper lot numbers in sequence. No tree symbols. A lighter topographic base (Exhibit A of CT 77-2, dated April 13, 1977, will satisfy this requirement).. Approved phasing. Elimination of grading and the words, "To Retain Natural" within the City park area. The southern-most recreational vehicle storage area shall be relocated as approved by the Planning Director. Paths through the public and private open space areas as required by the Parks and Recreation Director. Fencing and screening plan for the recreational vehicle storage areas. - Garages set back a minimum of 25' from the private drives. All pertil;ent dimensions. Final plans shall be drawn on 24" x 36" sheets. . xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 4 L . ’ -3- . i '. 4 4 1 2 3 - 4 d 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 I 1 3) A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted --to the Planning Department and shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Director for all graded slopes 5' or greater in height and any other areas required by the City prior to issuance of a Y radin q pe~~%j 96 if no graCiing permit ia required, prior to issuance of building permits. This plan shall incorporate acceptable drought resistant plant materials and acceptable water conserving irrigation systems. All improvements shall be installed prior to final occupancy. 4) Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehi.cular safety shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to issuance of final occupancy. 5) All utilities shall be placed underground. The CC&R's for this project shall state that individual, exterior television antennas are not permitted. 6) One hour fire resistive construction shall be utilized for all separation walls. A separate utility system shall be provided for each dwelling unit. 7) All of the appliable mitigation measures as identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR-115(A) for this project shall be implemented as follows: a) The applicant shall provide a letter from the North County Transit District as to whether or not bus service will eventually be routed through this development. If bus service is to be provided, the applicant shall make whatever on-site improvements are required by the City Engineer, b) Homes that will be impacted by the expected noise levels generated by Monroe Street traffic shall be properly insulated and buffered as required by state and local laws Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a report from an accoustical engineer suggesting provisions that would protect homes from noises generated by the expected traffic along Monroe Street when it connects to Marron Road. The Planning Director may include any of the provisions that he feels are feasible as-conditions of the building permits. 23 24 cl All existing.City policies and ordinances for resources conservation at time of development shall be utilized in this project. 26 27 28 d) Only low-volume flush toilets shall be used, d All private lighting shall be energy conserving wherever determined feasible by the City Engineer. Outdoor lighting, adequate for safety and security, shall be vapor metal. Indoor lighting in all bathrooms and kitchens, and wherever else determined feasible . by.the Planning Director shall be fluorescent. , ? 1 12 . 14 15 y 16 11 If 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2s 27 28 S! 9) LOI 11) c , Every z-008 h 1. s a 1 be constructed of fire retardant materials. A solid .fence of suitable material.for reducing noise around the amphitheater: material and location as approved by the Planning Director. Night lights.on the tennis courts will be so designed not to reflect and shine into existing or proposed homes. All conservation measures as submitted by the applicant shall be a) b) cl d) ‘e) f) 9) h) 3 j) k) 1) ml n) 0) PI implemented: Weatherstrip all exterior doors. Insulate exterior walls with R-11 insulation. Insulate all ceilings with R-19 insulation. Engineer heat system for minimum size furnaces. Provide for Chronatherm thermostats. Insulate all furnace ducts. Double insulation of all party walls plus sound proofing. Pilotless furnaces. Short furnace runs. Low water capacity toilets. Restricted flow shower heads. Low flow lavatories and sink faucets. Insulate hot water piping where exposed. Centrally located hot water heaters. c Caulk under all'exterior walls. S@un vapor tennis court. lighting. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on May 11; 1977 by the following vote, to wit: xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx . xxxxxxxxxxx . l -5- t * I 3 a 4 1 5 6 7 8 ATTEST: 9 10 14 15 = 16 i7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 _ 27 28 Commissioners Fikes, Jose, Watson and L’HeuYeux’ NOES: Commissioners Larson and Nelson .- ABSENT: Commissioner Ron&Otis . . - _ c .PUD EXHIBIT A (‘4-13-77) ' AB nU5088, Dated: 6-7-77 4 CT 77-2 BUENA MOODS, Kamar Const. --- --- . . . -._ --------y 1-r EXHIBIT A, (4-13-77) : AB f5088., Dated:-- 6-7-77 CT 77-2 ,,. d BUENA WOODS, Kamar Const. 2635 Crest carbbad, 4 Cal 920*8 May 31, 1977 Carlsbad City Council 1200 Elm Av. Carlsbad, Calif. Qqar Mayor Frazee, and Councilpersons Cosler, Lewis, Sko&j&i i pa Packard: aspects of the Planned Unit Development in the Hosp Grove to be known as Buena Woods III which you will consider.on June 7. The aspect I am most opposed to is the inclusion of 16 units on the west side of MOTOR St. which is 1x1 an area designated QS Open space on. the General Plan. I don’t belleve: thi& @XC@ptlOn to the General Plan is justified. Inclusion of these units will greatly reduce the open spa;Leir needed for the many bird species which make home in the grove. The Environmental Impact Report gave a very inadequate listing of bird species. Furthermore, homes on the west side of the street will add to the Orsffic problems on what will be a very busy street as well as detract from what could be a lovely drive down Monroe, a green belt for the people of Carlsbad. Also planned for this area between Nonroe and Crest D^r. is an equestrian trail. I strongly object to this on the basis that it is not needed. It will more likely be used as a dirt bike trail, causing erosion, noise and air pollution and further reducing bird populationr This is especially ob- jgctionable if trees must be removed. I believe I speak for many of the residents on Crest Dr. and hope you will NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 160) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a Publ4c Hearing in the City Council Chambers, 1206 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, June 7, 1977, to considm 3 KQI~Q~ Cd d&l&h !&b;C;c Plan (SP 160) on property generally described as a portion of Lots in Map 1136, north of Elm Avenue, on both sides of the extension of Monroe Street, and more particularly described on the map below: APPLICANT: KAMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL Publish: May 25, 1977 . . :_ . . -. f . . . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 160) Carlsbad wil NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the' City of 1 hold a Pub?% Hwinq in the Gity Council Cham5ers 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7iOO P.M. on Tuesday, June 7, 1577, to consider a request to delete Specific Plan (SP 160) on property generally described as a portion of Lots.in Map 1136, north of Elm Avenue, on both sides of the extension of Monroe Street, and more particularly described on the map below: . ; AiPCICAiT: KAMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY * CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL Publish: May 25, 1977 . .I 2 . -5 .- _~ . . . .* . . . .: . i . . . . . . . . . / 2 . . -, _ . ‘. _.-. . ,A. I. I . c.’ \ . \ I I . 2“ \z: &-i--q -! k 27O'L'213;~ -- . . . . 60 a‘ / IWIWEI OF PUBLIC HEhUNG RE: SPECIFIC PIAN ,(SP 160) ' N~C!E.IS HEREBY GIVEN that'the P1 .' anrung Ccmnission of the City of Carl&ad California, ml1 hold a public hearing on May 11, 1977, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambzrs, 1200 Elm Avenue, to consider a request to delete specific plan (SP 160) on property generally described as a portion of lots in F&p 1136, north of Elm Avenue, on both sides of the extension of Monrce St-Ret, and mre particularll d~~~Y~d &I u-k& I-mp L&J. II’ Those persons widxing to speak on this the publlic hearing, If you have any questions pkpsal are cordially invited to atend Planning Ikpartit. , plase cdl 729-1181 and ask for the APPLKX4T: Y\AMARccWSTRU~~ PUBLISH:. APRIL 27, 1977 . . . . ,' I CITYOFCARLSBADPLANNJKGKN?%ISSICN . - t I , I ; I ’ : :, . Barbara A. Dillard ' .25X. $Frest Drive . Carlsbad, CA 92008 j 0 Mack & Clara Russell 2691 Crest Dr. . ' , -j: qCarlsbad, CA 92008 e- < . 2;L .' . ' Tony & Marjorie Telebar Fred & Ella Plowman 1835 E'or~!3 Avenue 2729 Crest' Dr. Zarlsbad, CA 92008 car&&d, tA !l!JQO8. I. ; ‘67 : 'Del Rcya(LE) Wilson '& '$ Maril,yn Snedeker 3" 2736 Wikm St. ,. : ,i Carlsbad, .CA 92008 fz$ 4 .; ,:..;i Gerald & Mary C$ , ,fi I+ Palmquist * 3, r.2 2750 Wilson St. r ,T Carlsbad, CA 92008 ,.'I .F:, j .F I' c Vivian S. Carter ; $ .: 2785 Crest Dr. .f Carlsbad, CA 92008 > "F 'i <f . _.. .‘? ‘. r,k H-c Trederick & Bertina Carl & Mary Calcara McCartney 2726 Wilson St. 2560 Wilson Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Zarlsbad, CA .92008 1 Nicolai & Kathryn Kulik 2407 Buena Vista Circle Carlsbad, CA 92008 r;', * ?yA ganuel and Lydia Hernandex 2570 Wilson St. Zarlsbad, CA 92008 I 5; i” p James & Joyce H&son- 2790 Wilson St, Carlsbad, CA 920.08 Elmer & Myrna Swanger :< L i 2800 Wilson St. Carlsbad, CA 92008 'i /;). [f z f.5 <b .- ,'F I ;b ;6 Peter & Susan Goldring 1: 2844 Wilson St. ' x ‘C Carlsbad, CA 92008 5; c f Helene Bailey, Kermit Terry 2597. Crest Drive Cdrlsbad, CA 92008 _. James & Marilyn Sims 2820 Wilson St. carlsbad, CA 92008 Kurt & Irene Lucha 24341 Las Naranjas Laguna Niguel 92677 i$ . g Y. ‘-‘. j ,$ T. M. & Jayne Kqlb ,~ 2860 Wilson St. Car&bad, CA 92808 , -g _. Heniey &.Catherine ?- 2890 Wilscn St.' 65 Carlsbad, CA 92008 ". it - . _ _-. -. : . Edwin. & Peggy Coyle Peter and Joan Suffredini 2635 Crest Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 . . . . . . i I ! Dale & Eleanor Sm$th ' 15918 Gresham St, $ Sepulveda, CA 91343 t __ _.. Robert & Bertha Gillingham 2618 Wilson Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 -;. ; j 9,: ._ . ._ ,_ _ Jerald & Donavee White "; ,J Hobert & Velva Stay ,. 2660 Wilson St. Carlsbad, CA 92008 i ,.q Jerome &' Patricia -dt 1' <'I Anderson. 2663'Crest Drive ' Carlsbad, CA 92008 a' . ! ,4 Louis' &'Adeline Guevara-; .2710 Wilson St. 1818 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, CA 920'08 .A+ te . _ _ .‘ : . T r .Grove Apartment's c/o Bernie Citron 9713 Santa Monica Blvd. Beverly Hills, CA 90210 :j ; &I _.. ,'.. .a," Reed E. Adler p; P. 0. Box'7336 . Long.Beach, CA 90807 '. Buena Woods Unit No, II k Homeowners Assoc. i f 2070 Ave. of the Trees z 3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 E &. ., * _ & . Group Ten Investment fj! Development.Corp. F P. 0. Box 1611 E $ Newport Beach, CA 92.663 $ Kenneth 6 Caroiyn Dabbsi" P. 0,. BOX 619 : me..1 ehail PA 92008 ._ t Mr.& Mrs. James Inman 'Y- Mr. & Mrs. J.A. Lorenat f Mr. Nicholas L & Mrs. 3 ' ZQOG? Ave. of the Trees l 1126 Naples Ave. Karoly Carlsbad, California 920(2 Placenta, CA 92670 2006 Ave.Of The Trees --.-:* 4 Carlsbad, CA' 92008 -v $: . .s r : rr, / 9 {Y t.4 1,: w - -6 a - .- -;. n,l - ., : j Mr.&Mrs. Glenn Swisher , Mr. Glenn Miller ." i, ,,:c- .,I TL" 3 3‘ .v ; '_ 1433 Santa Teresa I ,* ,' .<* _ a.\* .F .- 5941 E. Armaga Springs .,,;.. , '- ' :,) ." ; "$2 So.Pasadena, CA 91030 I 'LI : I_ 1 Ranch0 Palos Verdes,CA .'. a .',. , ' I . . 90274 ;.. ., '_* .: :,_ :. . J' ";f. . . : 4 I 3 ) :. ',/ 1' d Iv -i. ',,.# . AL_ > --_ 1 ' Mr.&Mrs. John Santaniellc Charles & Ruth Ryder ' Mr. & Mrs. L.A.Lundgren c/oDr. Gabriel Rakoczy 2020 Ave. Of The Trees 2038 Ave.Of The Trees 211 Emerson St. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Upland, CA 91786 Warner & Dorothy Lusardi: 1025 Pacific - Apt A Oceanside, CA 92054 Q Jack & Genie Green ;, 5 , 1744 Burgundy Rd. Leucadia, CA 92024 + Q George & Joyce Covello i 4 2552 Hutchison St. Vista, California 92083 e Carroll and Merle Smith 14 2003 Ave. Of The Trees Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Joe t Linda White ;A 2007 Ave.Of The Trees Carlsbad, Ca 92008 1 Mr.&Mrs.J.J. Lawler '.' 2009 Ave.Of The Trees ' Carlsbad, CA 92008 j ’ .4 Robert C. Layng, Sr. &' 2011 Ave.Of TheTrees ' Pm--7 ,L-sl f-3 07nAQ 4 Mr. & Mrs.'Wirt Williams Mr.&.Mrs. H.M.Otwell 2022 Ave. of the Trees 2040 Ave.Of The Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA.92008 Mr.& Mrs. G.G. Hendricks Mr.&Mrs. R.M.Larson 2024 Ave. Of The Trees P. 0. Box 1521 Carlsbad, CA 92008 CArlsbad, CA 92008 Mr.& Mrs. James Hennenhoeffer 225 E. 3rd Ave. Escondido, CA-92025 Thomas Chapman .I ' Anne Vituladitis 2044 Ave.Of The Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008 I. , t Mr.& Mrs. W. C. Buchman P.0. Box 528 Alhambra, CA 91802 i Mr.&- Mrs. C. D, Woods 2046 Ave.Of The Trees Carlsbad, CA, 92008 Howard Farrand ! Mr.& Mrs. J. H, Blake 31846 Sunset Ave. ' 2048 Ave.Of The Trees ;< so. Laguna, CA 92677 : Carlsbad, CA 92008 i p+ :, Helen Blessing .j Edward Tomei 2032 Ave. Of The Trees .' Escrow Dept: Southwest Carlsbad, CA 92008 Bank 1737 W. Vista Way ."$ Vista, CA 92083 1 Mr. & Mrs. Eric Mezger 1 Mr..& Mrs. Keith Kennedy ' 2034 Av+Of The Trees ,: 2052 Ave. of the Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 I Car&bad, CA 92008 B . : : ti, 0 Mr.&Mrs. Monteith Weaver" 2056 Ave. of the Trees 0 Robert D. Templeton Box 150 Carlsbad, 92008 P. 0. Ca Oceanside, CA 92054 -.. I CJJ‘ -“icy* ?rj '5, s* - ( Virginia A. Segy 2058 Ave. of the Trees b le-3 4; h- & -p Mr.& Mrs. Willard Carlsbad, CA 92008 yg .3 2 4* Wilkinson I, rw %, 4-z", 'es cw '3 ,$I / q! ,- 2043 Ave. of the Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008 11313 Lakeland Rd. Norwalk, CA 90650 Mr.& Mrs. Henry Carroll 2062 Ave. of the Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008 Barbara Kritch 2064 Ave. of the Trees carlsbad, CA 92008 Mr.& Mrs. John Fleming 2066 Ave.of the Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008 ,A Mr,6r Mrs, Max Stwks ; .2080 Ave. of the Trees +' / Carlsbad, CA 92008 b i xc ) B f I Mr. & Mrs. L. Newberger j 431 Burnside Ave #12K i Los Angeles, CA 90036 5’ * P 1 t )f Mr.& Mrs. J.F. Austin "! 2084 Ave.Of The Trees :" Carlsbad, CA 92008 9 F’I %+ Mr.& Mrs. George Long Y Box 462 $ Ozark, Alabama 36360 Richard Haddad 2088 Avenue of the Car&bad, CA 92008 Mr,&Mrs. R. Russell P, 0, Box 20 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Kaczmarek 2041 Ave.of the Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008 Eloise T. Madrid 2039,Ave.of the Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mr.& Mrs. J. G.' Worth 2037 Ave.of the Trees Carslbad, CA 92008 Trees <'I Mr.& Mrs. M. P. Wittner ;;r 2049 Ave. of the Trees Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Mr.& Mrs. Wm. SkOUfe $ 2074 Ave. of the Trees ! MYC. & Mrs. P. K. Adler a* 2047 Ave. Of the Trees ! Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad,, CA 92008 ', / I d 3, .J ._ ?I Mr.& Mrs. J.M.Broome @'l Mr. & Mrs. W. P. Lynott 20% Ave,of the Trees 4 2045 Ave. of the Trees Kp -c 1": Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 921008 / SEACOAST FINANCIAL. . ir Kamar Contruction b'k George M. Ashley . . CORPORATION 4 $5,21'HOte'l Circle Wes P. 0. Box 1155 . Y. ' Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ingeborg M. Ashley San Diego, CA 92108 Carlsbad; CA 92008 ,,;; .Carlsbad, CA 92008 of-the Trees , Robert D. Templeton 3 2054 Ave. of the Trees Carlsbad, CA 92008 4 . 4 .$ : ,’ y%?& -?+# “:’ r I ._..L. __ i a! 2. 6. e,s”&l& -ge &,. 4. Gy’$&L _ .__ _.- ^. , . 2: .-.” _, _ .Bc Henryk & Lilian c?s i $ Charles & Joyce Brown & Neal & Elia Hesprich q Siemiradzki . 2070 Ave. of the Trees 2072 Ave of the Trees 2068 Ave. of the Trees , Carlsbad, CA 92008 i: Carlsbad, CA 92008 . J Carlsbad, 92008 P I- 1 'z -+$ r?- -by 4, -&v 47 , ._ I $%; ;s' ‘4 $ 43 se‘: James 61 Cynthis Broome ..- George & Carol Ahrens =g -r 6; & & bLk tq d-- "2 2076 Ave. of the Trees. 2078 Ave of the Trees Carhsbad, CA 92008 , Carlsbad, CA 92008 , :1 i - q&L. 'I 7&a, i * T-f -'+& &f w&& ,Y' _ L$* d$& F > I= -.... .-_ -.tg - _. I- James & Noreen Futcher '$ Jane R. Phillips 54 Jack & June Cram .. 3535 Bedford Court ' 1866 Forrest Ave. 1846 Forrest Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 i Carlsbad, CA 92008 . .- . - 4+ .- - ‘. i’ ‘t‘ P . 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD-8) AND TENTATIVE MAP FOR CT 77-2. NOTICE Is HE%EBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm-IAvenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, June 7, 1977, to consider approval of a Tentative Map Subdivision far land division and a P-tanned Unit Development for 130 units on property of approximately 44 acres located generally on the sotith side of Hosp I:ay adjacent to Monroe Street, and more particularly described as: Those portions of Lots, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 27 and of Canon Street in Hosp Eucalyptus Forest Co's Tract No. 1 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof 1136 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 8, 1908, described in Assessor's Book 156, Page 090, Parcels 36, 37, 38 and 39 and more particularly described in the files of the City of Carlsbad Planning Department. APPLICANT: JERRY ROMBOTIS (WAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY). CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL Publish: May 25, 1 977 1 . . T \\ .NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD-8) AND TENTATIVE MAP FOR CT 77-2 * . . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad s Mill bold a Pub1 ;c karjng -!n ihe f!!iy !ounc:! Chambers, 1200 Elm-IAvenue i Carlsbad, California, at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, June 7, 1977, to consider' approval of a Tentative Map Subdivision for land division and a Planned Unit Development .for 130 units on proeprty of approximately 44 acres located generally on the south side of Hosp Way adja-ent to Monroe Street, r' -v/ and more particularly described as: .* ,I # . Those portions of Lots, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 27 and of Canon Street in Hosp Eucalyptus Forest Co's Tract No. 1 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof 1136 filed in the Office cf the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 8, 1908, described in Assessor’s Book 156, Page 090, Parcels 36, 37, 35 and 39 and more particularly described in the files of the City of Carlsbad Planning Department. APPLICAN';': JERRY ROMBOTIS (KAMAR CONSTRUCTICN COMPANY). CARLSBAD CITY.COUNCIL Publish:. May 25, 1977 k .i . . MYrICE OF PUBLIC H3zARIm .a 2 , jr RE: .PL?W?EDC a DEVElOPMEW (Pm--8) AND Cd TF+ClJ (CT 77-2) . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIvE;I\J that_ the Planning Comnission of the City of Calsbad will hold a Public Hearing at the City Council Chambers, l-200 Elm Avenue,' Car&bad, California at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, April 27, 1977, to consider a tentative subdivision map for land division and a planned unit development for 130 units on property of approximately 44 acres located generally on the south side of Hosp Way adjacent to Mmroe, and more particularly described as: Those prtions of I&s 2, 3, 4,5, and 27 and of Canon Street in Hosp Eucalyptus Forest Co.' s Tract No. I in the Ci-ty of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof 1136 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, Jure 8, 1908, described in Assessor's Book 156, Page 090, Parcels 36, '37, 38 ad 39 and more particularly describd in the files of the City of Car&bad Planning DepzKm!ent. Those persons wishing to sp?,ak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the . public hearing. rkpaat . If you ha= any questions, please call 729-1181 and ask for the Planning APPLICANT: JERRYF?Cm%"rIS (ImmRCCNsTRuCTIm Co.), PUBLISH APRIL 13, 1977 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING -nSSION t BUENA WOODS II HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ___--_--_---------------------------- WE, THE UNDERSIGNED BELOW, DO HEREBY PROTEST THE COMPLETION OF HOSP WAY THRU BUENA WOODS III G IV, FROM MONROE TO EL CAMINO REAL. AS AN ALTERNATIVE, WE RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT THAT A MORE FEASIBLE ACCESS ROAD BE EITHER COMPLETION OF ELM STREET TO DONNA STREET TO HOSP WAY OR MONROE STREET THRU TO MARPOW STREET. 0 l / n ! . ..! i .c . ,: - 6. 4Y Iv.. \ a \ . . HOSP WAY L. KLEMA, ENGLNEERS, INC. ,uL( “0 CIVIL ENGINEEAS .. SURVEYOIlS 7693 41t HALE AVE. LPC0N0I00, CALIr. UWG “0. 145.‘222 .f . .r . It F : ) 1 c . l . . 1.. I ! / ,f I .I i i . : . . . . ; * . .’ . e . . . . * . ‘. :i e . . * . I . ;: ’ . . t _’ . I ‘, : . 3. I . ,i _* i , . . . * I t. .. ‘. -- -... -,.‘..- .__. _ _ . -r- . ..:,. . \ . .- 1 . . . . . ._d ._ ._ -- l 1 ---..--.e...‘.......-- -. ----L.. .I , . . ., i . ‘. I. . . . . * * . : . 1 ., . ..-v ,-.