HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-11-15; City Council; 5158-3; Revision to 1st phase sewer allocationUl 1 T Uf / KL5L5AU
' ' .
'AGENDA BILL NO. ' /3~$ -_^hjtA6nL*££' -^
DATE': November 15, 1977
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
f,-
Initial: .-
Dept. Hd. ^6
City Atty
City Mqr.
'"' €±5^S >'
• •'
SUBJECT:
REVISIONS TO FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION
PROGRAM
STATEMENT OF THE MATTER:
Since the opening of the filing period for the First Phase Sewer Allocation
permits on October 26, 1977, staff has received many questions concerning
the allocation system and the rating questionnaires. On November 8, 1977,
Staff met with the Council Sewer Committee to discuss these concerns. During
the course of this meeting, it became evident that certain revisions were
needed. The recommended changes to Exhibit "S" of City Council Resolution
No. 5199 and attachments are itemized with explanation in the attached memo-
randum and hand-corrected copy of the resolution.
The major changes recommended include deletion of the five criteria for ap-
plication to be determined by the City Council and deletion of the minimum
point totals on the -Rating System Questionnaire. Minor changes are also
incorporated to accommodate these major changes and to clarify the question-
naires .
EXHIBITS
Memorandum to City Council dated 11/10/77.
City Council Resolution No. 5199 (marked up with recommended changes).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Council Sewer Committee recommend that the changes to Exhibit
"S" of Resolution No. 5199 as outlined in the attached memo be approved and
Staff be directed to implement said changes immediately.
It is also recommended that the closing date for the First Sewer Allocation
applications be extended from November 28, 1977 to December 5, 1977.
Council Action:
11-15-77 Council concurred with the changes #2 and #3 as contained
in the memo from the Planning Department dated November 10,
1977, and directed staff to return with the necessary
documents incorporating those changes.
Council approved extending the closing date for the First
Phase Sewer Allocation applications from November 28, 1977
to December 5, 1977.
FORM PLANNING 73
MEMORANDUM
November 10, 1977
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO EXHIBIT "S" OF CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 5199
1. CHANGE; Deletion of five criteria for application to be determined by
the City Council (Item 4.a-e of Section V.A, page 4 of Exhibit "S").
EXPLANATION; Item 4 should be deleted for the following reasons:
a) These criteria were meant to screen applications prior to
acceptance by Staff. Item 4 would not be able to be de-
termined until after the applications were reviewed by the
Council, after acceptance by Staff.
b) Many questions have arisen by applicants regarding inter-
pretation of some of the sub-criteria under Item 4. For
example, under sub-criteria "D", what if someone had a
parcel in escrow prior to April 19, 1977, but escrow can-
not close until issuance of building permits?
c) The intent of Item 4 is still maintained by the Council's
perogative to approve or deny permits based on the over-
all goals and objectives of Resolution No. 5199 when all
applications are forwarded to them for Council review.
2. CHANGE; Deletion of minimum point totals on this Rating System Ques-
tionnaire (Item 5 of Section V.A., page 5 of Exhibit "S").
EXPLANATION; Item 5 should be deleted for the following reasons:
a) The minimum points do not correspond properly to possible
points in Rating Questionnaire. For example, it is almost
impossible to receive the required minimum points for
multiple-family residential land uses.
b) The Council still has the perogative to deny all applications
in a particular land use if they determine all of the appli-
cations fall below the minimum intent of Resolution No. 5199.
c) 'Competition for the limited capacity in each land use should
be sufficient incentive for applicants to design the "best"
project possible.
- 2 -
d) Frivolous applications are already discouraged by the appli-
cation fee, requirement for completed plans, and knowledge
of the City Council's stated intent of the First Phase Allo-
cation System.
3. CHANGE; Minor technical revisions to the Rating System Questionnaires.
EXPLANATION;
a) Industrial/commercial projects with no showers need com-
parable percentage points to offset points given to projects
with showers using water saving devices.
b) Percentage scales were modified to eliminate voids between
percentages and to better reflect possible points in each
category.
c) Water heaters with electro-spark pilot lights are not avail-
able or necessary. Residential water heaters had inadvertently
been put in place of stoves with electro-spark pilot lights.
d) Credit for thermopane windows in residential projects had in-
advertently been omitted.
MZ:nm
- •
•
o
j 1e << <j>VINCENT F. BIONDO, JVTTORNEY - CITY OF C,1200 ELM AVENUE\RLSBAD, CALIFORNIA>- °
o
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION Nq. 5199
A RESOLUTION OF THE'CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
A FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM
PURSUANT TO SECTION 18.05.030 OF THE
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, by the
adoption of Ordinance No. 8073, has added Chapter 18,05 to the
Carlsbad Municipal Code to impose a building permit moratorium
due to the lack of sewer treatment capacity; and
"WHEREAS, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 18.05.030, the
City Council provided for the eventuality that a limited amount
•
of capacity could become available which would not be of sufficient
quantity to justify lifting the building permit moratorium but
which, nevertheless, could be available to be allocated within
the City's sewer service area; and
T7HEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has reached agreement with the
»
Encinitas Sanitation District to lease approximately seventy-five
thousand gallons of capacity in the Encina Treatment Plant which\'
will accommodate an estimated 270 equivalent dwelling units in
the City of Carlsbad's sewer service area; and
WHEREAS, said amount of sewer capacity is insufficient to
meet even a portion of the~ existing current demand for sewer
permits and, therefore/ does not justify a complete lifting of
the building permit moratorium; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt a fair and
equitable system for allocating the available amount of sewage
treatment capacity pursuant to the authority of Section 18.05.030
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and" • w
x
WHEREAS, a Council Committee has worked for many weeks in an
D
GO
• CCcc ^
~> 0
Ou.o o
ul •
5'|0 £It?
>_
o
'
CO804TO
u.<1 => o< t
§5
8 d2 <CQ
CO
CC
O
•
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
effort to devise a fair and equitable system to allocate the
V f
capacity and produced a draft First Phase Allocation Sytem; and
WHEREAS, Planning Director has determined that said system
will have a nonsignificant impact on the environment and a Negative
Declaration has been prepared and filed. The City Council has
considered said Negative Declaration and finds that the require-
ments of the City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance
of 1972 and the California Environmental Quality Act have been
satisfied in regards to said system; and
WHEREAS, a noticed public hearing has been held on the system
•
and after full and complete consideration, the City Council has
determined it to be in the public interest to adopt a system
which can be used for a first phase allocation of the lease
i
capacity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.v ,
2. That pursuant to the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
18.05.030, the City Council hereby adopts the First Phase Sewer
Allocation System as set out in Exhibit "S", attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
3. It is the intent of the Council in adopting said system
to adopt a framework which can be used to fairly and equitably
allocate some or all of the additional sewer capacity which the
City has leased from Encinitas. In adopting this system, the
City Council does not obligate itself to allocate all or any part
f
of the available capacity pursuant thereto. Prior to approval of
First Phase Sewer Allocation Permits, the Council may find it
2.
o
CO
_1
cc ^
~~> CJ
O u.0 0
it
LL *
g Ho nc
It
•t
0
^
CO8CNO
m<
P> o.
< t
5<UJ O
So^ <CO
cc
O
•
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
necessary to further amend the allocation system. The system is
*subject to change and may or may not be used in the future if
additional amounts of sewer capacity become available. Upon
completion of the initial allocation/ the Council intends to
reevaluate the system in light of their experience. A judgment wil
be made at that time as to whether or not the substance of the
first phase system can be incorporated into an -allocation system
for use in the fut\ire.
4. As a part of the first phase system, the City Council
has provided special rules which apply to building permits issued
pursuant to the sewer allocations made under this system. Those
rules provide that building permits must be taken out promptly
and processed diligently to conclusion or they will be void. In
l
so doing, the Council has deviated from the provisions of the
Uniform Building Code. Thic action is necessitated by Lhe unique
local circumstances resulting from the City's building and sewer
moratorium. In order to insure that the available amount of sewer\ . •
capacity is utilized in the best interest of all the citizens of
Carlsbad, the Council wishes to insure that sewer permits, when
issued, will be used as soon as possible and will not be stockpiled
thereby denying other, perhaps more worth, projects an opportunity
to proceed. The Director of Building and Housing is hereby directec
to file a copy of this resolution with the State as necessary to
justify the deviation from the Uniform Building Code necessitated
by special local conditions.
5. The City Council has determined that it is necessary to
collect a special fee as a condition of the issuance of a sewer
allocation permit pursuant to the first phase allocation system.
i 3.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12Q<
§ | 13
*$ §
o- " 3 | 14
g ° g oc
st<§ 15
& | 8 o- 16Ul Z CM <J2o " i '•'•
IE I' 17< <>• °t 18' o -1-0
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The fee will be in addition to
issuance of building and sewer
proportional share of the total
all other fees required for the
permits! The fee is based on a
five year lease cost for the
capacity which the City must pay to Encinitas. The amount of
the special fee is hereby established as $375.00 for each equivalent
dwelling unit.
adjourned
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at an/ regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the 25th day of October , 1977
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council men Frazee,Lewis, Packard, Skotnicki and
Council woman Casler
NOES: None
ABSENT: None •
1
\
ATTEST :
—)/l v>-/7ffl I - x * -rf~~r if f f £f/// If f 4*LtigJs £ f s/f f^f^f -#<spf ^ -
MAEG/&ET £. ADAJlS, City ClerkV
(SEAL)
- .
/
r
»
4
v/^7 A ^/
/t f*^*^ £f *V "X^^ /
/ i f J*~**M^-jP * \ J7 j& sS*^I/ \~O {J*-^* v^-'t~*£cX£>_
ROBERT C. FRAZEE, May«5^
-
** . fc
.
-
CITY OF CARLSBAD
•' ' .FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION7 SYSTEM
Exhibit "S" to
Resolution No. 5199
9-30-77
.»• Corrected per adaption
10-26-77
IMS-77
I. Objectives;
The sewer allocation system contained herein is intended to provide
. a framework" within which the City Council can make some judgments
regarding the allocation of a limited amount of sewer capacity
which may become available. This system is designed to meet the
following City objectives:
A. To fairly and equitably allocate a limited amount of sewer
capacity among competing demands.
B. To coordinate development with needed public improvements.
C. To maintain and enhance levels of City services (infilling).
D. To preserve and/or enhance the"efficiency of service delivery
systems to allow time to provide public facilities adequate
to meet expanded service needs.
,- i
E. To renew and maintain existing urban areas.
F. To develop vacant land that is within existing urban areas
and is currently serviced by public facilities; i.e., streets,
water/ sewer.
II. Available Sewer Capacity;
*It is estimated that the first phase sewer allocation system will
have 270 number of equivalent dwelling units and 75,000 gallons of
. sewer treatment capacity to be considered for allocation". This
capacity may be distributed on the basis.of the criteria contained
within this document. The amount of sewer capacity required for
any particular project shall be determined on the basis of equiv-
alent dwelling units according to the established City System
in that regard.
III. Purpose and Intent: • .* ' «
A. The guiding criteria for the application and interpretation
of this system' shall be to maximize the overall community
benefits for the City of 'Carlsbad. «*• i -. •
B. This sewer allocation system is for those portions of the City
of Carlsbad which are located within the Carlsbad service area.
C. This sewer allocation system is responding to the specific needs
of the community in terms of those persons known or unknown who
have been caught by the sewer mpratorium established April 19,
1977. • ;
D. The City Council has determined to consider allocating some
or all of the leased sewer capacity which we have acquired
covering such concerns as: 1) distribution of sewer capacity
by percentage to specific land use categories; 2) creating a
rating system within the various land ,use categories; 3)
establishing community benefits for the City of Carlsbad as
the major allocation criteria; • and 4) development of a system
to fairly recognize those persons affected by the moratorium
of April 19, 1977.
IV. Land Use Distribution;.
The following land use distribution of sewer allocation is
established for this First Phase Sewer Allocation System:
Percentage Equivalent
of Available Dwelling Units
Capacity (E.D.U.'S)
A. Industrial Land Use 30% .81
B. Commercial Land Use
a. General 15% 40
b. Office 5% 14
\• •
C. Single Family Residential
Land Use * . x 20% * 54
• "• -' .
D. Multiple Family
Residential Land Use ** 10% 27
*•
* Single family residential land use shall be those dwelling
units proposed on legal recorded lots in the Rr-1 and R-A
zones and dwelling units in other residential zones where
the density is 7,500 sq. ft. of land per unit or less.
**Multiple family residential land use shall be all dwelling •
units where the density i£ greater than one dwelling unit
per 7,500 sq. ft'.
•^»• x .-2-
Applications for sewer permits 'will be divided by use in accord
with the above categories. Projects in each category will be
rated against other projects in the same category and separate
allocations will be made within, each category. In addition to
the above categories, there are two more categories with capacity
to be distributed:
Percentage
of Available
Capacity
E.D.U.'s
(Equivalent
Dwelling Units)
E. Community Facilities
(Includes parks, schools,
other governmental build-
ings, churches, hospitals
and airports) - 5%
F. Contingency (Includes
failing septic tanks and
community-development'
rehabilitation programs,
• redevelopment areas,
capital improvement programs
and a reserve capacity
for other exceptions to the
sewer moratorium contained
in Section 18.04.170 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. 15%
14
40
The Community Facilities and Contingency categories are designed
to reserve sewer capacity rather than allocating fixed amounts
immediately as the other land use categories. It is anticipated
that between now and when optimum sewer capacity ±c. available,
.there will be a continuous need for capacity in the various land
uses identified in these two categories. It may be necessary to
establish a separate rating /system for these two categories if
a high demand occurs; however, at this time it is anticipated that
these will be handled on an "as needed" basis by a case-by-case
• ' evaluation by the City Council. The only exception to the City
Council allocating these two categories based on community need
and the public welfare, is that the City Manager shall have
authority to issue sewer connection permits for failing septic
tank systems. ...
V. Procedures for applying for Sewer Permits Under the First Phase
Allocation System.
A. It is assumed that there will be more applications for a sewer
allocation than there is available capacity. Therefore, -*Htve>~tkrefi.
qualifications are established which must be satisfied at the '
time of application -in order for the application to be considered.
-3-
.It is the judgement of the City Council that only projects
which can meet these qualifications should be eligible to
participate in the First Phase Allocation. These qualifications
are also intended to screen applications in a preliminary way
to provide a reasonable guide to save unnecessary engineering
and design costs for a proposed project where there is little
chance of the project qualifying for a sewer allocation permit.
The qualifications are as follows:
1. No residential project will be eligible for consideration
that is outside of the infill area as shown on the map
marked'Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a/part hereof.
Commercial and industrial land uses may be considered
anywhere within the City's sewer service area.
2. With the exception of City building or sewer permits, all
approvals, including City Council action and other agency
approvals, such as the California Coastal Commission and
Sanitation and Water Districts, must have been issued and
proof of such approval must be submitted with the appli-
cations. The applicant must .demonstrate that he is reaidy
and able to commence construction of the project upon
receipt of a City building permit.
3. ,No public costs for City facilities to service the site,
such as streets, sewers, etc., are required.
t was
can be
direct result
following criteria
develomapplication
contrxbutions to
elop which cannot now
The proje
public agen
be refunded.
proponents
The site already
hookups to fully
single family home on a
and legally of record as
the only application
The application is
lot owned by the
of April 19,
submitted by t applicant
by the City Council.criteria determin
er hookup but needs -additional
the project.
-4-
ie applicant shall complete an Application^-ft5r Sewer
Allbts^tion, a Questionnaire for Application Qualification
and a Ra*fe4,ng System Questionnair^><rfx forms attached hereto
as Exhibit tJv^^.In order to re<rt5ive further consideration,
the. applicant nms>1>^4^tajj^<£he following minimum point total
on the Rating
_^«
(Single Family)
Residential (Multiple)
lercial
"Industrial 30
B. Applicants for projects which apparently qualify under all
categories listed above, shall then prepare the following infor-
mation as the official application for a first phase sewer
allocation permit.
1. Documents Required for Submittal;
The following documents are required to provide sufficient infor-
mation to accurately rate the application, and to determine if the
proposal meets Code requirements. Errors or omission may cause
. disqualification.
a) Application.,- i
b) Questionnaires for qualification and for rating
(Application attachments).
c) Evidence that lot is a legal building site«ownod by the
.nppliormt and of record prior to April 19, 1977»
d). Proof in writing that all discretionary actions involving the •
various public agencies have been completed.
e) Ten ozalid prints of the site plan. The site plan shall contain
all information suitable for submittal for building permits as
required by the Building Official if sewer permits are granted
to that proper, review can be made, and to insure project can be
constructed, the proposal shall meet all Code requirements. -
f) A written list and explanation of.what water, sewer and energy
conserving material or construction techniques that are going
to be used. (Such list will become part of the record and
plans must comply with the list and be to the satisfaction of
the City Building official.)
'- .
g) Application Fees:- The submittal of a processing fee in the
amount of -
-5-
$ 25.00 for community facilities.
$ 25.00 for single family residence.
$ 50.00"for multiple family residence.
$100.00 for commercial, or industrial uses.
The deadline for filing applications is the close of the business
day, 3n0-<lr)y^TVTT?^m^]^'?n' nf Por-MnH nn Nn. 51 oa- Applications
shall be filed with the Planning Department.
VI. Staff Evaluation.
After the closing date for receipt of applications, a staff committee,
consisting of the Public Works Administrator, City Engineer, Director
of Building and Housing and the Director of Planning, shall evaluate
each application in accordance with the provisions of this section.
The committee shall prepare a report for the City Council. The
report shrill show which projects in the judgment of the committee
meet the *SCS£-qualifications of Section V, The report shall also
show a point total for each project based on the staff judgment of
the project's ranking after applying the point system as set out in
the Rating System Questionnaire, a" part of Exhibit B, attached
hereto and made a part hereof. In addition, the report shall rank
the projects from the project with the highest total to the project
with _the lowest'total for each land use category. Finally, the
report shall recommend which projects in each category should
receive a sewer allocation permit... The staff shall report their
findings to the City Council within 30 working days fro^r. the deadline
for submissions of applications. The committee findings shall be
mailed or otherwise made available to all persons xvho have applied
for a sewer allocation permit before the. Council hearing,
VII. City Council Action.
The City Clerk shall set a public hearing before the City Council
to consider the staff committee report. After completion of the
public hearing on the report, the Council shall first consider and
resolve any disagreements between applicants and staff in regards to
• the qualifications of Section V. The Council shall then eliminate
from further consideration for permits under this first phase, alloca^
tion all projects which do not meet the Section V qualifications.
The Council shall review the recommendations of the Staff Report in
regards to the point ranking of qualifying projects within each land
use category. The Council shall have the prerogative of making its
own policy interpretations of the rating system in reaching its
decision on allocations. If the Council is not satisfied that the
: -. results .of_the..rating system meet the objectives and purposes and
-6-
"intent of the system, the." Council may amend 'it as they consider
necessary in the public interest. When the Council is satisfied
with the findings and the ranking of the projects, they shall
adopt a list of such projects which shall become the basis for
- issuing sewer permits and building permits in the Carlsbad sewer
district boundaries. Inclusion of a project on the approved list
shall constitute authorization pursuant to Municipal Code Section
18.05.030 for the exception of that project from the building
moratorium imposed by Chapter 3.8.05 of the Code.
> 'i
The Council is under no obligation to allocate all or any part of
the available sewer capacity pursuant to this system. The Council
reserves the right to establish point total cut off within each
land use category as they consider necessary in order to insure the
available capacity is used in the best interests of the citizens of
Carlsbad. Any capacity which is not allocated as a part of this
first phase allocation, or which is allocated but not used, shall
remain in reserve to be reallocated as the Council may determine by the
adoption of a second phase system or by the further amendment of
this system. • •
III. Permits and Fees
The successful applicant, within the rating system shall be required
to.perform in the following manner in order to obtain and retain a
sewer permit:
A. A complete building permit application must be filed within 30
days .after Council action approving the list of projects eligible
for sewer allocations. The project must be as represented in
the allocation application.
B. Concurrently with the issuance of a building permit the applicant
shall obtain a sewer connection permit and pay the fee therefore
as required by the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Applicant shall
also pay a special sewer allocation permit fee of $^375. 00 per
EDU for his project. The special fee shall be used' to pay the
• . - lease cost of the capacity^allocated by this system.
.C. The applicant must take-out his building, sewer and other
necessary permits within 20 days after mailing of written
notice by the City that plan check is complete and that the
. building permit is ready for issuance.
0* *
D. After issuance of a building permit by the Building Department,
construction shall commence within 30 days and be diligently
pursued without interruption until completed. If construction
does not progress in a reasonably timely way, or is interrupted
for any period in excess of 30 days, the building permit and
sewer permit will be void. All fees shall be non-refundable. .
'
-7- • . ;r
Exceptions may be granted by the City.Council if they find that the
developer has acted in good faith, in a reasonable manner and
that the delay in construction is due to failures beyond the
control of the developer.
E.• If a building permit is voided, a new building permit may be
obtained which will only be issued if the project qualifies for
a new sewer allocation pursuant to such system that the Council
may adopt in the future.
NOTE TO APPLICANTS
This First Phase Allocation System is adopted based on an
assumption that the'City will have available 75,000 gallons of
additional sewer capacity on lease from another member of the
Encina Treatment Plant. This assumption is based on Engineer's
estimates. The true facts are difficult to determine and the
assumptions which underlie the system are subject to change.
There is no guarantee that a project, which apparently qualifies
for an allocation pursuant to this system, will actually receive a
• ' sewer permit. Further, there is no guarantee that the issuance
of a sewer allocation permit wil-1 insure that capacity v;ill ir.
fact be available at the time of occupancy. The City may not
exceed its capacity rights in the plant and, therefore, must be
governed by the actual availability of capacity at the time
the hookup is made. Efforts by applicants to obtain an allocation
permit or perform.work pursuant to such permit are at your own
risk. ' .
CARLSBAD
——-;i- ••-••-• L*—• -~. CITY
^->>\N''-'f ^ ^-^-^ ^ v .Oi^\\"^^C^;\ Vi^s^^^r
_^te^ .%h\"' .-
1000 7.000 3000 FEET
•EXHIBIT-A
AUG. 25,1977
CARLSBAO.CALIFCRNIA
FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATIOM
INFILL AREA BOUNDARY CARLSBAD
COASTAL ZONE BOUNDARY (FOR EXACT LOCATION CONTACT PLANNING DEPT.)
EXHIBIT B
9-1-77
APPLICATION. FOR SEWER ALLOCATION PERMIT #
(Please Print or Type) Date
1. Description of Project (Residential, Commercial, Industrial...
no. of units, etc.):
2. Location of Project: The subject property is generally located on
the side of between
and
3. Assessor's Number: Book . Page Parcels
Book Page Parcels
!
(Please list others at bottom o£ page).
4. 'Owner(s):
Name Address City State Zip Phone
5. Person(s) responsible for preparation of plans or.design:
Name Address City State Zip Phone
Registration of License No
6. Applicant:
Name Address City State Zip Phone
Representing (Company or Corp.):
I hereby declare that all information contained within this application
and the accompanying attachments have been READ, UNDERSTOOD, AND HAVE
BEEN ANSWERED CORRECTLY TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY.
Applicant's Signature X
-^^^ . ,--.,,;,,.,;.
Exhibit C ,.
9-1-77
Rev, 11-15-77
Questionnaire for. Application Qualifications
The following five questions must be answered concerning your project:
1. Is the location of your project inside the infill boundaries as
approved by Council, excluding Commercial and Industrial Land
Use (the official map is located at the Planning Department)?
2. Have all discretionary actions, including all City actions,
Coastal Commission, Sanitation and Water District action been
completed (proof will be required with submittal of application)?
3. Will the project create any public costs for City facilities such
as streets, sewers, etc.?
please indicate if any of the .following conditions exists
application for development was applied for t
19, 1977, and the project was delayed as
of acrx?n by the City: Yes . No .
You or
contributions
which cannot nov
of your project have madex^pecial money
er to develop
No
p public agencies in
36 refunded
c. The site already has
hookups to complete the
sewerx*foukv.p but needs additional
ect: Yes No
d. The application is fq,
by the applicant a
and this is the
one s:fie
e. Any similar,
.... . Explains'•r'>..,-• v^-OWf*.,- tJ^^f,,.—,
family home on a lot ov/ned
legally ofN^ecord as of April 19, 1977,
bmitted by the applicant.
Yes No
ly application
iteria as determined by Council .
system
obtained for
ed rating
points can be
Residential (Single Family - 25;
Evidence in support of affirmative responses should be referenced or
attached.
Date Signature
. ' - ,~ Exhibit E
10-18-77
Ke.v. ll-JS-77
RATING SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE
for
INDUSTRIAL - COMMERCIAL LAND USES
Please answer the following questions. Additional pages showing
evidence in support of the points indicated may be attached.
1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices listed
below. Please check the devices, if any, which will be incorporated
into the project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed
below, all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped
wherever appropriate.)
Faucets
Lavatory sink aerators (flow restrictors) 2%
Spring loaded faucet 5%
Quick heat lavatory faucet 5%
Showers
Thermostatic mixing valve 4%
Flow conlrol head or in-line restrictor 4%
Hot Water Pipes^-Wo sWoers mc(04eA i« projed %%>
Insulation r ^ 5%
Toilets
Flush valve (1' line) 15%
at ing
ilve (1
POINTS
0
1
2
3
4
.v -5'6"""""*
7
8
9
10
(convection or forced)
1 line)
% WATER REDUCTION
0-4%
5-9%
10-14%
15-19%
20-24%
"*.-,- 't,.,-. - 25-29%" ^ ' 30-34%
35-39%
' : 40-44%
4 5 -&&%* 4 ~7*fe
5&tr+" 4*«7L
Comments or Explanation
2. Points v/ill be given based on the following methods to conserve
energy. Please check the devices, if any, which will be incorporated
into the project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed
below, all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped
wherever appropriate.)
Pilot lights for furnaces -a^d wo fro r heaters-.
Electro-spark 5%
Windows
Thermopane 10%
Solar Heating
Hot Water Augment 5%
Building Heating % by Engineering
Desi gn
POINTS % ENERGY CONSERVATION
0 No energy conservation considerations
1 . 1-5%
2 6-10%
3 11-15%
4 16-20%
5 21-25%
6 26-30%
7 , 31-35%
8 36-40%
9 41-45%
10
Comments or Explanation
3. Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent
by significant amounts? (Circle appropriate points that you
believe your project should be allotted.)
0
' 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
- No reduction
- .Up to 2% ,
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
- Over 18%
Comments or Explanation
-2-
Does the project remove or rehabilitate older dilapidated structures
within the community of a non-historic nature?*
0 - Land Vacant
3 - Rehabilitation
5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure
*Structure is defined as any main building on a lot.
Does the proposed project participate in a capital project listed
on the City Council's approved Capital Improvement Program?
•
POINTS
0 - No
5 - Partially completes a capital project
10 - Completes a capital project
Comments or Explanation .
Will the project require less than 50% of the sewer capability
that is available in its land use type?
0 - 50% and over
1 - 40% -
2 - 30% -
3 - 20% -
4 - 10% -
5 - 5 -
6 - 2 -
7 - 0 -
Comments or Explanation
7. Will the project provide substantial assessed value to the City?
' " ""^POINT'S RECEIVE'D "^'iiW'^'^'*-"^-^^ -QUARTILE • • •-' - ^<
0 •. Bottom 25% of Projects ,
3 Third 25% of Projects
6 Second 25% of Projects
9 ' " Top 25% of Projects
METHOD: Projects shall be arrayed from highest to lowest building
valuations. Building evaluation for each project shall be
computed multiplying the square footage of building area in
each project by the appropriate construction cost factors
set forth in the Building Department Valuation Tables.
r
Comments
-3-
GENERAL COMMERCIAL ONLY
(Not part of rating for office uses)
8. Will the project provide substantial taxable sales to the City?
POINTS RECEIVED QUARTILE
0 . Bottom 25% of Projects
3 Third 25% of Projects
6 • Second 25% of Projects
9 Top 25% of Projects
METHOD: Projects shall be arrayed from highest to lowest potential
taxable sales. Potential taxable sales for each project shall
be computed by multiplying the squarefootage of gross leasible
building area in each project by the following factors:
USE TAXABLE SALES PER SQUARE
FOOT OF BUILDING(S)
Regional Shopping Center 90
Community & Neighborhood
Commercial Center • 60
Specialty Store TOO
Discount Store 80
Furniture and Appliances ' 60
Furnishings 60
T.V., Stereo, Records 120
Building Supplies 90
Paint and Wallpaper 120
Auto Service and Supplies. 80
Dinner Restaurant 140
Coffee Shop * 120
Fast Food 250
Mini-Supermarket 40
Car Dealership - set amount of $1.8 million
r
Comments
-4-
TIE BREAKING RATING POINT SYSTEM
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL
In case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may be
applied as a tie breaker:
1. Distance to public transportation system
Points
0 h mile +
1 3/8 to 1/2 mile
2 1/4 to 3/8 mile
3 1/8 to 1/4 mile
4 0 to 1/8 mile
2. Fire Response Time
Points
0 . No access
1 Over 6 minutes
2 5' to 6 minutes
3 ' 4 to 5 minutes
4 3 to 4 minutes
5 2 to 3 minutes
6 1 to 2 minutes
7 0 to 1 minutes
Comments
-5-
- - EXHIBIT F
10-18-77
Rev, K-IS--77
RATING SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE
for
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE
Please answer the following questions. Additional pages showing
evidence in support of the points indicated may be attached. .
1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices listed below.
Please check the devices if any which will be incorporated into
the project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed below,
all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherever
appropriate.)
Faucets
Kitchen sink aerator (flow restrictors) 2%
Lavatory sink aerator (flow restrictors) 3%
Quick heat lavatory faucet 5%
Showers
Thermostatic mixing valve • 5%
Flow control head or in-line restrictor 15%
Hot Water Pipes
Insulation . ' 10%
Recirculating (convection or forced) 15%
Appliances
Cycle adjust dishwasher (bulie-in) • 2% "
POINTS % WATER REDUCTION
0 0-4%
1 5-9%
2 10-14%
3 15-19%
4 20-24%
5 25-29%
;,.,, ,6 ., .. ,. . . .v_ ... 30-34%
7 35-39%
8 . -, 40-44%
9 45-49%
10 50%*-57%
Comments or Explanation
Points will be t, . ven based on the following methods to conserve
energy. Please check the devices if any which will be incorporated
into the project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed
below, all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped
wherever appropriate.)
Pilot Lights (for furnaces,
Electro-spark
ater heaters)
Solar Heating
Hot water augment
Building heating
POINTS
0
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
Comments
10%% by Engineering
Design
% ENERGY CONSERVATION
No energy
1-5%
6-10%
11-15%
16-20%
21-25%
26-30%'
31-35%
36-40%
41-45%
conservation considerations
or Explanation
Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent by
significant amounts? (Circle appropriate points that you believe
your project should be allotted.)
0 - No reduction
1 - Up to 2%
2 - 4%
v«r*r>iS"3 ~ -,-v,->-^, -6% • • •-•;«•"..•.. >,--:-^ ..>,;.,.^"r1'4 - '"'"""'^ex '"" '••<f**---^-~';-----•"•*•-• <v"•••.••-"••-••--• :- •• • -•'«• :••'•". • •-••• ••:•-• •-•
5 - 10%
6-12% •
7-14%
8 - 16%
9-18%
10 - Over 18%
Comments or Explanation
-2-
Does the project remove or rehabilitate older dilapidated structures
within the community of a non-historic nature?*
0 - Land Vacant
3 - Rehabilitation
5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure
*Structure is defined as any main building on a lot
Does the proposed project participate in a capital project listed
on the City Council's approved Capital Improvement Program?
POINTS
0 - No
5 - Partially completes a capital project
10 - Completes a capital project
Comments or Explanation
6. Will the project require less than 50% of the sewer capability that
is available in its land use type?
0 - 50% and over
1 - 40% -2 - 30% -
3 - 20% -
4 - 10% -
5 - 5% -
7 " n% -7 - 0 -
Comments or Explanation
*fl-~%!iS:*$i*-q ?.<•&•*. ?-*¥;5^VH?^-?!l^^^3^^^ • W-'-T-i*.: : • „» ,
-3-
TIE BREAKING RATING POINT SYSTEM
In case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may be
applied as a tie breaker:
1. Distance to Parks and Recreation
Points
0
1
2
3
4
h mile +
3/8 to 1/2 mile
1/4 to 3/8 mile
1/8 to 1/4 mile
0 to 1/8 mile
2.Distance to public transportation system
Points
0
1
2
3
4
3." Fire Response 'Time '
Points
01
2
3
4
5
6
7
Comments'
h mile +
3/8 to 1/2 mile
1/4 to 3/8 mile
1/8 to 1/4 mile
0 to 1/8 mile
No access
Over 6 minutes
5
4
3
2
1
0
•tV ••,&'*& .'.v/.-i^-' it"«j>n; ...
to
to
to
to
to
to
6
5
4
3
2
1
:-B>'S
mi
mi
mi
mi-
mi
mi
•<*^
nutes
nutes
nutes
nutes
nutes
nutes
' '••-..•.:•,*•.::. '.'•-.. -^----vy-.-r.. -.-• •• -v- - ..,-...-. . . .,- _..
-4-