HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-11-22; City Council; 5158-4; 1st phase sewer allocation system-revisionCITY OF CARLSBAD
AGENDA BILL NO. 5158-Supplement #4 _ Initial
Dept.Hd
DATE: _ _ ' November 22, 1977 _ c
DEPARTMENT: _ City Attorney _ C. Mgr.
Subject:
FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM - REVISIONS
Statement of the Matter
The City Council, at your November 15, 1977 meeting,.
directed your attorney to prepare certain revisions
to the First Phase Sewer Allocation System. The
revisions (Points 2 and 3 in Planning .Department
memorandum of November 10, 1977) deleted the minimum
point requirements from the initial qualifications
and made some technical revisions in the points on the
Rating System Questionnaires. The Council also extended
the closing date for the First Phase Sewer Allocation
permit applications from November 28, 1977 to December 5,
1977. A resolution adopting a revised First Phase Sewer
Allocation System is attached.
Exhibit
Resolution No. 5259
Recommendation
If the City Council concurs, your action is to adopt
Resolution No. 5259
Council action
11-22-77 Resolution #5259 was adopted, revising the First Phase Sewer
allocation system adopted by Resolution #5199 pursuant to
Section 18.05.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Q
VINCENT F. BIONDO. JR.ATTORNEY • CITY OF CARLSB/1200 ELM AVENUE:ARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92003o
-
3.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 5259
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, REVISING
THE FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 5199 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 18.05.030 OF THE CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has
determined that certain revisions are necessary in the First
Phase Sewer Allocation System adopted by Resolution No. 5199
y *
pursuant to Section 18.05.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Carlsbad as follows;
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the First Phase Sewer Allocation System,
Exhibit "S" to Resolution No. 5199, is hereby superseded by
a revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System as set out in
Exhibit "S" Revised, dated November 15, 1977, attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
3. The Revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System
shall be subject to all the terms and conditions of this
resolution and Resolution No. 5199.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 22nd day of
1977, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
None
Councilmen Frazee, Lewis, Packard, Skotnicki and
Councilwoman Casler
None
ABSENT:
.OBERT C. FRAZEE, Mayr
ATTEST:
fVRET^E. ADAMS, City Clerk
Resolution No. 5199
9/30/77
Corrected per adoption
10/26/77
Revised 11/5/77
Exhibit "S", Revised 11/15/77
to Resolution No. 5259
CITY OF CARLSBAD
FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM.
I. Objectives
The sewer allocation system contained herein is intended to provide a
framework within which the City Council can make some judgements re-
garding the allocation of a limited amount number of sewer capacity which may
become available. This system is designed to meet the following City
objectives:
A. To fairly and equitably allocate a limited amount of sewer capacity
among competing demands.
B. To coordinate development with needed public improvements.
C. To maintain and enhance levels of City services (infilling).
D. To preserve and/or enhance the efficiency of service delivery systems
to allow time to provide public facilities adequate to meet expanded
service needs.
E. To renew and maintain existing urban areas.
F. To develop vacant land that is within existing urban areas and is
currently serviced by public facilities; i.e., streets, water,
sewer.
II. Available Sewer Capacity
It is estimated that the first phase sewer allocation system will have
270 number of equivalent dwelling units and 75,000 gallons of sewer
treatment capacity to be considered for allocation. This capacity may
be distributed on the basis of the criteria contained within this
document. The amount of sewer capacity required for any particular
project shall be determined on the basis of equivalent- dwelling units
according to the established City system in that regard.
III. Purpose and Intent
A. The guiding criteria for the application and interpretation of this
system shall be to maximize the overall community benefits for the City
of Carlsbad.
B. This sewer allocation system is for those portions of the City of
Carlsbad which are located within the Carlsbad service area.
C. This sewer allocation system is responding to the specific needs of the
community in terms of those persons known or unknown who have been caught
by the sewer moratorium established April 19, 1977.
D. The City Council has determined to consider allocating some or all of the
leased sewer capacity which we have acquired covering such concerns as:
1) distribution of sewer capacity by percentage to specific land use
categories; 2) creating a rating system within the various land use
categories; 3) establishing community benefits for the City of Carlsbad
as the major allocation criteria; and 4) development of a system to
fairly recognize those persons affected by the moratorium of April 19,
1977.
IV. Land Use Distribution:
The following land use distribution of sewer allocation is established
for this First Phase Sewer Allocation System:
Percentage Equivalent
of Available Dwelling Units
Capacity (E.D.U's)
A. Industrial Land Use 30% 81
B. Commercial Land Use
a. General 15% 40:
b. Office 5% , 14
C. Single Family Residential
Land Use * 20% 54
D. Multiple Family
Residential Land Use ** 10% 27
* Single family residential land use shall be those dwelling units
proposed on legal recorded lots in the R-l and R-A zones and dwelling
units in other residential zones where the density is 7,500 square
feet of land per unit or less.
** Multiple family residential land use shall be all dwelling units
xvhere the density is greater than one dwelling unit per 7,500 sauare
feet.
- 2. -
Applications , . sewer permits will be divided / use in accord with
the above categories. Projects in each category will be rated against
other projects in the same category and separate allocations ivill be
made within each category. In addition to the above categories, there
are two more categories with capacity to be distributed:
Percentage EDU's
of Available (Equivalent
Capacity Dwelling Units)
E. Community Facilities
(Includes parks, schools,
other governmental build-
ings, churches, hospitals
and airports) 5% 14
F. Contingency (Includes
failing septic tanks and
community development
rehabilitation programs,
redevelopment areas,
capital improvement programs
and a reserve capacity for
other exceptions to the
, sewer mortatorium contained
in Section 18.04.170 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code 151 40
The Community Facilities and Contingency categories are designed to
reserve sewer capacity rather than allocating fixed amounts immed-
iately as the other land use categories. It is anticipated that
between now and when optimum sewer capacity is available, there will
be a continuous need for capacity in the various land uses identified
in these two categories. It may be necessary to establish a separate
rating system for these two categories if a high demand occurs; how-
ever, at this time it is anticipated that these will be handled on an
"as needed" basis by a case-by-case evaluation by the City Council.
The only exception to the City Council allocating these two categories
based on community need and the public welfare, is that the City Manager
shall have authority to issue sewer connection permits for failing septic
tank systems.
V. . Procedures for Applying for Sewer Permits Under the First Phase Allocation
System ' ~~
A. It is assumed that there will be more applications for a sewer allo-
cation than there is available capacity. Therefore, four qualificat-
ions are established which must be satisfied at the time of appli-
cation in order for the application to be considered.
It is the judgement of the City Council that only projects which can
meet these qualifications should be eligible to participate in the
First Phase Allocation. These qualifications are also intended to
screen applications in a preliminary way to provide a reasonable guide
to save unnecessary engineering and design costs for a proposed project
where there is little chance of the project qualifying for a sewer allo-
cation permit. The qualifications are as follows:
1. No residential project will be eligible for consideration that is
outside of the infill area as shown on the map marked Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part hereof. Commercial and industrial
land uses may be considered anywhere within the City's sewer service
area.
2. With the exception of City building and se\vTer permits, all approvals,
including City Council action and other agency approvals, such as
the California Coastal Commission and Sanitation and Water Districts,
must have been issued and proof of such approval must be submitted
with the applications. The applicant must demonstrate that he is
ready and able to commence construction of the project upon receipt
of a City building permit.
3. No public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as
streets, sewers, etc., are required.
4. The City Council must find that at least one of the following criteria
• exists:
a) An application of some form for development was applied for prior
to April 19, 1977, and it can be found that delays in the process
were a direct result of City actions.
b) The project proponents have made contributions to public agencies
in order to develop which cannot now be refunded.
c) The site already has a sewer hookup but needs additional hookups
to fully complete the project.
d) The application is for one single family home on a lot owned by
the applicant and legally of record as of April 19, 1977, and
this is the only application submitted by the applicant.
e) Any similar criteria as determined by the City Council.
B. Applicants for projects which apparently quality under the categories listed
above, shall then prepare the folloiving information as the official appli-
cation for a first phase sewer allocation permit.
I. Document s Required^ for jubmi ttal
The following documents are required to provide sufficient information to accu-
rately rate the application, and to determine if the proposal meets Code re-
quirements. Errors or omission may cause disqualification.
a) Application
b) Questionnaires for qualification and for rating (Application
attachments).
c) Evidence that lot is a legal building site owned by the applicant
and of record prior to April 19, 1977.
d) Proof in writing that all discretionary actions involving the
various public agencies have been completed.
e) Ten ozalid prints for the site plan. The site plan should contain
all information suitable for submittal for building permits as re-
quired by the Building Official if sewer permits are granted so
that proper review can be made, and to insure project can be con-
structed, the proposal shall meet all Code requirements.
f) A \«-itten list and explanation of what water, sewer and energy
conserving material or construction techniques that are going to
be used. (Such list will become part of the record and plans
must comply with the list and be to the satisfaction of the City
Building Offical).
g) Application Fees: The submittal of a processing fee in the amount
of:
$ 25.00 for community facilities
$ 25.00 for single family residence "
$ 50.00 for multiple family residence
$100.00 for commercial or industrial uses
The deadline for filing applications is the close of the business
day, on December 5, 1977. Applications shall be filed with the
Planning Department.
VI. Staff Evaluation
After the closing date for receipt of applications, a staff committee,
consisting of the Public Works Administrator, City Engineer, Director
of Building and Housing and the Director of Planning, shall evaluate
each application in accordance with the provisions of this section.
The committee shall prepare a report for the City Council. The report
shall show which projects in the judgment of the committee meet the
qualifications of Section V. The report shall also show a point total
for each project based on the staff judgment of the projects ranking
after applying the point system as set out in the Rating System
Questionnaire, a part of Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part
hereof. In addition, the report shall rank the projects from the pro-
ject with the highest total to the project with the lowest total for
each land use category. Finally, the report shall recommend ivhich
projects in each category should receive a sewer allocation permit.
The staff shall report their findings to the City Council within 30
working days from the deadline for submissions of applications. The
committee findings shall be mailed or otherwise made available to
all persons who have applied for a sewer allocation permit before
the Council hearing.
VII. City Council Action
The City Clerk shall set a public hearing before the City Council
to consider the staff committee report. After completion of the
public hearing on the report, the Council shall first consider and
resolve any disagreements between applicants and staff in regards
to the qualifications of Section V. The Council shall then elimin-
ate from further consideration for permits under this first phase
allocation, all projects which do not meet the Section V qualifi-
cations.
The Council shall review the recommendations of the Staff Report in
regards to the point ranking of qualifying projects within each land
use category. The Council shall have the prerogative of making its
own policy interpretations of the rating system in reaching its
decision on allocations. If the Council is not satisfied that the
results of the -rating system meet the objectives and purposes and
intent of the system, the Council may amend it as they consider
-necessary in the public interest. When the Council is satisfied
with the findings and the ranking of the projects, they shall adopt
a list of such projects which shall become the basis for issuing
sewer permits and building permits in the Carlsbad sewer district
boundaries. Inclusion of a project on the approved list shall con-
stitute authorization pursuant to Municipal Code Section 18.OS.030
for the exception of that project from the building moratorium im-
posed by Chapter 18.05 of the Code.
The Council is under no obligation to allocate all or any part of
the available sewer capacity pursuant to this system. The Council
reserves the right to establish point total cut-off within each
land use category as they consider necessary in order to insure the
available capacity is used in the best interests of the citizens of
Carlsbad. Any capacity which is not allocated as a part of this
first phase allocation, or which is allocated but not used, shall
remain in reserve to be reallocated as the Council may determine by
the adoption of a second phase system or by the further amendment of
this system.
II11. Permits and Fees
The successful applicant within the rating system shall be required
to perform in the following manner in order to obtain and retain a
sewer permit:
A. A complete building permit application must be filed within 30
days after Council action approving the list of projects eligi-
ble for sewer allocations. The project must be as represented
in the allocation application.
- 6 -
B. Concurrently with the issuance of a building permit the applicant
shall obtain a sewer connection permit and pay the fee therefore
as required by the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Applicant shall also
pay a special sewer allocation permit of $375 per EDU for his
project. The special fee shall be used to pay the lease cost of
the capacity allocated by this system.
C. The applicant must take out his building, sewer and other necessary
permits within 20 days after mailing of written notice by the City
that plan check is complete and that the building permit is ready
for issuance.
D. After issuance of a building permit by the Building Department,
construction shall commence within 30 days and be diligently pur-
sued without interruption until completed. If construction does
not progress in a reasonably timely way, or is interrupted for any
period in excess of 30 days, the building permit and sewer permit
will be void. All fees shall be non-refundable. Exceptions may be
granted by the City Council if they find that the developer has
acted in good faith, in a reasonable manner and that the delay in
construction is due to failures beyond the control of the developer.
E. If a building permit is voided, a new building permit may be obtained
which \tfill only be issued if the project qualifies for a new sewer
allocation pursuant to such system that the Council may adopt in the
future.
NOTE TO APPLICANTS
This First Phase Allocation System is adopted based on an assumption
that the City will have available 75,000 gallons of additional sewer
capacity on lease from another member of the Encina Treatment Plant.
This assumption is based on Engineers' estimates. The true facts are
difficult to determine and the assumptions which underlie the system
are subject to change. There is no guarantee that a project, \vhich
apparently qualifies for an allocation pursuant to this system, will
actually receive a sewer permit. Further, there is no guarantee
that the issuance of a sewer allocation permit will insure that ca-
pacity will in fact be available at the time of occupancy. The City
may not exceed its capacity rights in the plant and, therefore, must
be governed by the actual availability of capacity at the time the
hookup is made. Efforts by applicants to obtain an allocation permit
or perform work pursuant to such permit are at your own risk.
In addition to Pages 1 through 8 hereof, the Revised First Phase Sewer
Allocation System shall include the following:
Exhibit A - Infill Map
Exhibit B - Application for Sewer Allocation Permit
Exhibit C - Questionnaire for Application Qualifications
Exhibit E - Rating System Questionnaire: Industrial/
Commercial.
Exhibit F - Rating System Questionnaire: Residential
- 7 -
OCEANSIDE
CAR^JBAD
IOOO ZOOO 5OOO FEET
XHIBIT- A
AUG. 25,1977
CARLSBAQ.CALlFCRNiA
INFILL AREA BOUNDARY CARLSBAD
COASTAL ZONE BOUNDARY (FOR EXACT LOCATION CONTACT PLANNING DEPT.)
Exhibit B
9-1-77
APPLICATION FOR SEVER ALLOCATION PERMIT
(PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT)DATE
1. Description of Project (Residential, Commercial, Industrial. .
etc.):
No. of Units,
2.Location of Project: The subject property is generally located on the
side of between
and
3. Assessor's Number: Book Page Parcels
4.
(Please list others at bottom of page)
Owner(s):
Name Address City State Zip Phone
5. Person(s) responsible for preparation of plans or design:
Name Address City State Zip Phone
Registration of License No.
6. Applicant:
Name Address City State Zip Phone
Representing (Company or Corp.):
I hereby declare that all information contained within this application and
the accompanying attachments has been READ, UNDERSTOOD, AND HAS BEEN ANSWERED
CORRECTLY TO TIE BEST OF MY ABILITY.
Applicant's Signature X
Exhibit C
9-1-77
Rev. 11-15-77
IJESTIONNAIRE FOR APPLICATION' QUALIFICATIONS
The following four questions must be answered concerning your project:
1. Is the location of your project inside the infill boundaries as approved
by Council, excluding Commercial and Industrial Land Use (the official
map is located at the Planning Department)? _
2. Have all discretionary actions, including all City actions, Coastal
Commission, Sanitation and Water District action been completed (proof
will be required with submittal of application)?
3. Will the project create any public costs for City facilities such as
streets, sewers, etc.?
4. Please indicate if any of the following conditions exist:
a) An application for development was applied for prior to April 19, 1977
and the project was delayed as a result of action by the City:
Yes_ No
b) You or agents of your project have made special money contributions to
public agencies in order to develop which cannot now be refunded:
Yes No
c) The site already has a sewer hookup but needs additional hookups to
complete the project: Yes No
d) The application is for one single family home on a lot owned by the
applicant and legally of record as of April 19, 1977, and this is
the only application submitted by the applicant: Yes No
e) There exists similar criteria as listed above: Yes No
Explain: ^ .
Evidence in support of affirmative responses should be referenced or attached.
Date Signature
Exhibit E
10-18-77
RATING SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE
for
INDUSTRIAL - COMMERCIAL LAND USES
Please answer the following questions. Additional pages showing evidence
in support of the points indicated may be attached.
1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices listed below.
Please check the devices, if any, \vhich will be incorporated into
the project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed below,
all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherever
appropriate).
Faucets
Laboratory sink aerators (flow restrictors) 2% ^_
Spring loaded faucet 5%
Quick heat lavatory faucet 5%~~
Showers
Thermostatic mixing valve 4%
Flow control head for in-line restrictor 4%
No showers included in project 8%
Hot Water Pipes
Insulation 5% :
Recirculating (convection or forced) 8%
Toilets ~~
Flush valve (1" line) 15%
POINTS % WATER REDUCTION
0 0-4%
1 5-9%
2 10 - 14%
3 15 - 19%
4 20 - 24%
5 25 - 29%
6 30 - 34%
7 35 - 39%
8 40 - 44%
9 45 - 47%
10 48%
Comments or Explanation
2. Points will be given based on the following methods to conserve energy.
Please check the devices, if any, which will be incorporated into the
project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed below, all such
fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherever appropriate).
Pilot Lights for Furnaces
Electro-spark 5%_
Windows
Thermopane 10%
Solar Heating
Hot Water Augment 5%
Building Heating % by Engineering
Design
POINTS %_ENERGY CONSERVATION
0 No energy conservation considerations
1 1-5%
2 6 - 101
3 11 - 15%
4 16 - 20%
5 21 - 25%
6 26 - 30%
.7 31 - 35%
8 36 - 40%
9 ' 41 - 45%
10 46%+
Comments or Explanation
3. Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent by sig-
nificant amounts? (Circle appropriate points that you believe your
project should be allotted).
0 - No reduction
1 - Up to 2%
2 - 4
3 - 6%
4 - 8%
5 - 10%
6 - 12%
7 - 14%
8 - 16%
9 - 18%
10 - Over 18%
Comments or Explanation
- z ~
Does the project remove or rehabilitate older dilapidated structures
within the community of a non-historic nature? *
0 - Land Vacant
3 - Rehabilitation
5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure
* - Structure is defined as any main building on a lot
Does the proposed project participate in a capital project listed on
the City Council's approved Capital Improvement Program?
POINTS
0 - No
5 - Partially completes a capital project
10 - Completes a capital project
Comments or Explanation
6. Will the Droject require less than 50% of the sewer capability that is
available in its land use type?
0 - 50% and over
1 - 40% - 49.99%
2 - 30% - 39.99%
3 - 20% - 29.99%
4 - 10% - 19.99%
5 - 5% - 9.99%
6 - 2% - 4.99%
7 - 0% - 1.99%
Comments or Exnalantion
7. Will the project provide substantial assessed value to the City?
POINTS RECEIVED QUARTILE
0 Bottom 25% of Projects
3 Third 25% of Projects
6 Second 25% of Projects
9 Top 25% of Projects
METHOD: Projects shall be arrayed from highest to lowest building valuations.
Building evaluation for each project shall be computed multiplying
the square footage of building area in each project by the appropri-
ate construction cost factors set forth in the Building Department
Valuation Tables.
Comments
- 3 -
GENERAL COMMERCIAL ONLY
(Not part of rating for office uses)
8. Will the project provide substantial taxable sales to the City?
POINTS RECEIVED OUARTILE
0 Bottom 25% of Projects
3 Third 251 of Projects
6 Second 25% of Projects
9 Top 25% of Projects
METHOD: Projects shall be arrayed from highest to lowest potential
taxable sales. Potential taxable sales for each project
shall be computed by multiplying the squarefootage of gross
leasible building area in each project by the following
factors:
USE TAXABLE SALES PER SQUARE
FOOT OF BUILDING (S)
Regional Shopping Center 90
Community § Neighborhood Commercial
Center 60
Specialty Store 100 -
Discount Store 80
Furniture and Appliances 60
Furnishings 60
T.V., Stereo, Records 120
Building Supplies 90
Paint and Wallpaper 120
Auto Service and Supplies 80
Dinner Restaurant 140
Coffee Shop 120
Fast Food 250
Mini-Supermarket 40
Car Dealership - set amount of $1.8 million
Comments
- 4 -
TIE BREAKING RATING POINT SYSTEM
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL
In case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may be applied
as a tie breaker:
1. Distance to public transportation system
Points
0
1
2
3
4
Fire Response Time
Points
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Comments
% mile +
3/8 to % mile
\ to 3/8 mile
1/8 to % mile
0 to 1/8 mile
No access
Over 6 minutes
5 to 6 minutes
4 to 5 minutes
3 to 4 minutes
2 to 3 minutes
1 to 2 minutes
0 to 1 minute
- 5 -
Exhibit F
10-18-77
Rev. 11-15-77
RATING SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE
for
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE
Please answer the following questions. Additional pages showing evidence
in support of the points indicated may be attached.
1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices listed below.
Please check the devices if any which will be incorporated into the
project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed below, all
such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherever approp-
riate) .
Faucets
Kitchen .sink aerator (flow restrictors) 2%
Lavatory sink aerator (flow restrictors) 3%
Quick heat lavatory faucet 5%
Showers
Thermostatic mixing valve
Flow control head or in-line restrictor 1
Hot Water Pipes
Insulation 101
Recirculating (convection or forced) 15%~
Appliances
Cycle adjust dishwasher (built-in) 2%
POINTS % WATER REDUCTION
0 0-41
1 5-9%
2 10 - 14%
3 15 - 19%
4 20 - 24%
5 25 - 29%
6 30 - 34%
7 35 - 39%
8 40 - 44%
9 45 - 49%
10 50 - 57%
Comments or Explanation
2. Points will be given based on the following methods to conserve energy.
Please check the devices if any which will be incorporated into the
project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed below, all such
fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherexrer appropriate) .
Pilot Lights (for furnaces and stoves)
Electro -spark 5% _
Windows
Thermopane 101 _
Solar Heating
Hot water augment 10%
Building heating % T>yTEgineering
Design_
POINTS I ENERGY CONSERVATION
0 No energy conservation considerations
1 1-5%
2 6-10%
3 11 - 15%
4 16 - 20%
5 21 - 25%
• 6 26 - 30%
7 31 - 35%
8 . 36 - 40%
9 41 - 45%
10 46%+
Comments or Explanation
3. Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent by sig-
nificant amounts? (Circle appropriate points that you believe your pro-
ject should be allotted).
0 - No reduction
1 - Up to 2%
2 - 4%
3 - 6%
4 - 8%
5 - 10%
6 - 12%
7 - 14%
8 - 16%
9 - 18%
10 - Over 18%
Comments or Explanation
Does the project remove or rehabilitate older dilapidated structures
within the community of a non-historic nature?*
0 - Land Vacant
3 - Rehabilitation
5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure
* - Structure is defined as any main building on a lot
Does the proposed project participate in a capital project listed on
the City Council's approved Capital Improvement Program?
POINTS
0 - No
5 - Partially completes a capital project
10 - Completes a capital project
Comments or Explanation
6. Will the project require less than 50% of the sewer capability that is avail-
able in its land use type?
0 - 50% and over
1 - 40% - 49.99%
2 - 30% - 39.99% •-•
3 - 20% - 29.99%
4 - 10% - 19.99%
5 - 5% - 9.99%
6 - 2% - 4.99%
7 - 0% - 1.99%
Comments or Explanation
- 3 -
TIE BREAKING RATING POINT .SYSTEM
In case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may be applied
as a tie breaker:
1. Distance to Parks and Recreation
Points
0
1
2
3
4
% mile +
3/8 to % mile
% to 3/8 mile
1/8 to % mile
0 to 1/8 mile
3/8 to h mile
% to 3/8 mile
1/8 to % mile
0 to 1/8 mile
Distance to public transportation system
Points.
. 0
1
2
3
4
Fire Response Time
Points
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Comments
No access
Over 6 minutes
6 minutes5 to
4 to minutes
to 4 minutes
to 3 minutes
minutes
minutes
to
to
- 4 -
FIRST PHASE SHIVER ALLOCATION
To the best of my knowledge, 1117 proposed project will not require any public
costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets, sewers, etc.
I understand that if it is determined by City staff that my project will re-
quire such public costs, my application will be disqualified from consider-
ation and my application fees will not be refunded.
~Applicants Signature
Log No.