Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-11-22; City Council; 5158-4; 1st phase sewer allocation system-revisionCITY OF CARLSBAD AGENDA BILL NO. 5158-Supplement #4 _ Initial Dept.Hd DATE: _ _ ' November 22, 1977 _ c DEPARTMENT: _ City Attorney _ C. Mgr. Subject: FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM - REVISIONS Statement of the Matter The City Council, at your November 15, 1977 meeting,. directed your attorney to prepare certain revisions to the First Phase Sewer Allocation System. The revisions (Points 2 and 3 in Planning .Department memorandum of November 10, 1977) deleted the minimum point requirements from the initial qualifications and made some technical revisions in the points on the Rating System Questionnaires. The Council also extended the closing date for the First Phase Sewer Allocation permit applications from November 28, 1977 to December 5, 1977. A resolution adopting a revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System is attached. Exhibit Resolution No. 5259 Recommendation If the City Council concurs, your action is to adopt Resolution No. 5259 Council action 11-22-77 Resolution #5259 was adopted, revising the First Phase Sewer allocation system adopted by Resolution #5199 pursuant to Section 18.05.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Q VINCENT F. BIONDO. JR.ATTORNEY • CITY OF CARLSB/1200 ELM AVENUE:ARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92003o - 3. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 5259 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 5199 PURSUANT TO SECTION 18.05.030 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has determined that certain revisions are necessary in the First Phase Sewer Allocation System adopted by Resolution No. 5199 y * pursuant to Section 18.05.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows; 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the First Phase Sewer Allocation System, Exhibit "S" to Resolution No. 5199, is hereby superseded by a revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System as set out in Exhibit "S" Revised, dated November 15, 1977, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. The Revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System shall be subject to all the terms and conditions of this resolution and Resolution No. 5199. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 22nd day of 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: None Councilmen Frazee, Lewis, Packard, Skotnicki and Councilwoman Casler None ABSENT: .OBERT C. FRAZEE, Mayr ATTEST: fVRET^E. ADAMS, City Clerk Resolution No. 5199 9/30/77 Corrected per adoption 10/26/77 Revised 11/5/77 Exhibit "S", Revised 11/15/77 to Resolution No. 5259 CITY OF CARLSBAD FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM. I. Objectives The sewer allocation system contained herein is intended to provide a framework within which the City Council can make some judgements re- garding the allocation of a limited amount number of sewer capacity which may become available. This system is designed to meet the following City objectives: A. To fairly and equitably allocate a limited amount of sewer capacity among competing demands. B. To coordinate development with needed public improvements. C. To maintain and enhance levels of City services (infilling). D. To preserve and/or enhance the efficiency of service delivery systems to allow time to provide public facilities adequate to meet expanded service needs. E. To renew and maintain existing urban areas. F. To develop vacant land that is within existing urban areas and is currently serviced by public facilities; i.e., streets, water, sewer. II. Available Sewer Capacity It is estimated that the first phase sewer allocation system will have 270 number of equivalent dwelling units and 75,000 gallons of sewer treatment capacity to be considered for allocation. This capacity may be distributed on the basis of the criteria contained within this document. The amount of sewer capacity required for any particular project shall be determined on the basis of equivalent- dwelling units according to the established City system in that regard. III. Purpose and Intent A. The guiding criteria for the application and interpretation of this system shall be to maximize the overall community benefits for the City of Carlsbad. B. This sewer allocation system is for those portions of the City of Carlsbad which are located within the Carlsbad service area. C. This sewer allocation system is responding to the specific needs of the community in terms of those persons known or unknown who have been caught by the sewer moratorium established April 19, 1977. D. The City Council has determined to consider allocating some or all of the leased sewer capacity which we have acquired covering such concerns as: 1) distribution of sewer capacity by percentage to specific land use categories; 2) creating a rating system within the various land use categories; 3) establishing community benefits for the City of Carlsbad as the major allocation criteria; and 4) development of a system to fairly recognize those persons affected by the moratorium of April 19, 1977. IV. Land Use Distribution: The following land use distribution of sewer allocation is established for this First Phase Sewer Allocation System: Percentage Equivalent of Available Dwelling Units Capacity (E.D.U's) A. Industrial Land Use 30% 81 B. Commercial Land Use a. General 15% 40: b. Office 5% , 14 C. Single Family Residential Land Use * 20% 54 D. Multiple Family Residential Land Use ** 10% 27 * Single family residential land use shall be those dwelling units proposed on legal recorded lots in the R-l and R-A zones and dwelling units in other residential zones where the density is 7,500 square feet of land per unit or less. ** Multiple family residential land use shall be all dwelling units xvhere the density is greater than one dwelling unit per 7,500 sauare feet. - 2. - Applications , . sewer permits will be divided / use in accord with the above categories. Projects in each category will be rated against other projects in the same category and separate allocations ivill be made within each category. In addition to the above categories, there are two more categories with capacity to be distributed: Percentage EDU's of Available (Equivalent Capacity Dwelling Units) E. Community Facilities (Includes parks, schools, other governmental build- ings, churches, hospitals and airports) 5% 14 F. Contingency (Includes failing septic tanks and community development rehabilitation programs, redevelopment areas, capital improvement programs and a reserve capacity for other exceptions to the , sewer mortatorium contained in Section 18.04.170 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code 151 40 The Community Facilities and Contingency categories are designed to reserve sewer capacity rather than allocating fixed amounts immed- iately as the other land use categories. It is anticipated that between now and when optimum sewer capacity is available, there will be a continuous need for capacity in the various land uses identified in these two categories. It may be necessary to establish a separate rating system for these two categories if a high demand occurs; how- ever, at this time it is anticipated that these will be handled on an "as needed" basis by a case-by-case evaluation by the City Council. The only exception to the City Council allocating these two categories based on community need and the public welfare, is that the City Manager shall have authority to issue sewer connection permits for failing septic tank systems. V. . Procedures for Applying for Sewer Permits Under the First Phase Allocation System ' ~~ A. It is assumed that there will be more applications for a sewer allo- cation than there is available capacity. Therefore, four qualificat- ions are established which must be satisfied at the time of appli- cation in order for the application to be considered. It is the judgement of the City Council that only projects which can meet these qualifications should be eligible to participate in the First Phase Allocation. These qualifications are also intended to screen applications in a preliminary way to provide a reasonable guide to save unnecessary engineering and design costs for a proposed project where there is little chance of the project qualifying for a sewer allo- cation permit. The qualifications are as follows: 1. No residential project will be eligible for consideration that is outside of the infill area as shown on the map marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Commercial and industrial land uses may be considered anywhere within the City's sewer service area. 2. With the exception of City building and se\vTer permits, all approvals, including City Council action and other agency approvals, such as the California Coastal Commission and Sanitation and Water Districts, must have been issued and proof of such approval must be submitted with the applications. The applicant must demonstrate that he is ready and able to commence construction of the project upon receipt of a City building permit. 3. No public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets, sewers, etc., are required. 4. The City Council must find that at least one of the following criteria • exists: a) An application of some form for development was applied for prior to April 19, 1977, and it can be found that delays in the process were a direct result of City actions. b) The project proponents have made contributions to public agencies in order to develop which cannot now be refunded. c) The site already has a sewer hookup but needs additional hookups to fully complete the project. d) The application is for one single family home on a lot owned by the applicant and legally of record as of April 19, 1977, and this is the only application submitted by the applicant. e) Any similar criteria as determined by the City Council. B. Applicants for projects which apparently quality under the categories listed above, shall then prepare the folloiving information as the official appli- cation for a first phase sewer allocation permit. I. Document s Required^ for jubmi ttal The following documents are required to provide sufficient information to accu- rately rate the application, and to determine if the proposal meets Code re- quirements. Errors or omission may cause disqualification. a) Application b) Questionnaires for qualification and for rating (Application attachments). c) Evidence that lot is a legal building site owned by the applicant and of record prior to April 19, 1977. d) Proof in writing that all discretionary actions involving the various public agencies have been completed. e) Ten ozalid prints for the site plan. The site plan should contain all information suitable for submittal for building permits as re- quired by the Building Official if sewer permits are granted so that proper review can be made, and to insure project can be con- structed, the proposal shall meet all Code requirements. f) A \«-itten list and explanation of what water, sewer and energy conserving material or construction techniques that are going to be used. (Such list will become part of the record and plans must comply with the list and be to the satisfaction of the City Building Offical). g) Application Fees: The submittal of a processing fee in the amount of: $ 25.00 for community facilities $ 25.00 for single family residence " $ 50.00 for multiple family residence $100.00 for commercial or industrial uses The deadline for filing applications is the close of the business day, on December 5, 1977. Applications shall be filed with the Planning Department. VI. Staff Evaluation After the closing date for receipt of applications, a staff committee, consisting of the Public Works Administrator, City Engineer, Director of Building and Housing and the Director of Planning, shall evaluate each application in accordance with the provisions of this section. The committee shall prepare a report for the City Council. The report shall show which projects in the judgment of the committee meet the qualifications of Section V. The report shall also show a point total for each project based on the staff judgment of the projects ranking after applying the point system as set out in the Rating System Questionnaire, a part of Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof. In addition, the report shall rank the projects from the pro- ject with the highest total to the project with the lowest total for each land use category. Finally, the report shall recommend ivhich projects in each category should receive a sewer allocation permit. The staff shall report their findings to the City Council within 30 working days from the deadline for submissions of applications. The committee findings shall be mailed or otherwise made available to all persons who have applied for a sewer allocation permit before the Council hearing. VII. City Council Action The City Clerk shall set a public hearing before the City Council to consider the staff committee report. After completion of the public hearing on the report, the Council shall first consider and resolve any disagreements between applicants and staff in regards to the qualifications of Section V. The Council shall then elimin- ate from further consideration for permits under this first phase allocation, all projects which do not meet the Section V qualifi- cations. The Council shall review the recommendations of the Staff Report in regards to the point ranking of qualifying projects within each land use category. The Council shall have the prerogative of making its own policy interpretations of the rating system in reaching its decision on allocations. If the Council is not satisfied that the results of the -rating system meet the objectives and purposes and intent of the system, the Council may amend it as they consider -necessary in the public interest. When the Council is satisfied with the findings and the ranking of the projects, they shall adopt a list of such projects which shall become the basis for issuing sewer permits and building permits in the Carlsbad sewer district boundaries. Inclusion of a project on the approved list shall con- stitute authorization pursuant to Municipal Code Section 18.OS.030 for the exception of that project from the building moratorium im- posed by Chapter 18.05 of the Code. The Council is under no obligation to allocate all or any part of the available sewer capacity pursuant to this system. The Council reserves the right to establish point total cut-off within each land use category as they consider necessary in order to insure the available capacity is used in the best interests of the citizens of Carlsbad. Any capacity which is not allocated as a part of this first phase allocation, or which is allocated but not used, shall remain in reserve to be reallocated as the Council may determine by the adoption of a second phase system or by the further amendment of this system. II11. Permits and Fees The successful applicant within the rating system shall be required to perform in the following manner in order to obtain and retain a sewer permit: A. A complete building permit application must be filed within 30 days after Council action approving the list of projects eligi- ble for sewer allocations. The project must be as represented in the allocation application. - 6 - B. Concurrently with the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall obtain a sewer connection permit and pay the fee therefore as required by the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Applicant shall also pay a special sewer allocation permit of $375 per EDU for his project. The special fee shall be used to pay the lease cost of the capacity allocated by this system. C. The applicant must take out his building, sewer and other necessary permits within 20 days after mailing of written notice by the City that plan check is complete and that the building permit is ready for issuance. D. After issuance of a building permit by the Building Department, construction shall commence within 30 days and be diligently pur- sued without interruption until completed. If construction does not progress in a reasonably timely way, or is interrupted for any period in excess of 30 days, the building permit and sewer permit will be void. All fees shall be non-refundable. Exceptions may be granted by the City Council if they find that the developer has acted in good faith, in a reasonable manner and that the delay in construction is due to failures beyond the control of the developer. E. If a building permit is voided, a new building permit may be obtained which \tfill only be issued if the project qualifies for a new sewer allocation pursuant to such system that the Council may adopt in the future. NOTE TO APPLICANTS This First Phase Allocation System is adopted based on an assumption that the City will have available 75,000 gallons of additional sewer capacity on lease from another member of the Encina Treatment Plant. This assumption is based on Engineers' estimates. The true facts are difficult to determine and the assumptions which underlie the system are subject to change. There is no guarantee that a project, \vhich apparently qualifies for an allocation pursuant to this system, will actually receive a sewer permit. Further, there is no guarantee that the issuance of a sewer allocation permit will insure that ca- pacity will in fact be available at the time of occupancy. The City may not exceed its capacity rights in the plant and, therefore, must be governed by the actual availability of capacity at the time the hookup is made. Efforts by applicants to obtain an allocation permit or perform work pursuant to such permit are at your own risk. In addition to Pages 1 through 8 hereof, the Revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System shall include the following: Exhibit A - Infill Map Exhibit B - Application for Sewer Allocation Permit Exhibit C - Questionnaire for Application Qualifications Exhibit E - Rating System Questionnaire: Industrial/ Commercial. Exhibit F - Rating System Questionnaire: Residential - 7 - OCEANSIDE CAR^JBAD IOOO ZOOO 5OOO FEET XHIBIT- A AUG. 25,1977 CARLSBAQ.CALlFCRNiA INFILL AREA BOUNDARY CARLSBAD COASTAL ZONE BOUNDARY (FOR EXACT LOCATION CONTACT PLANNING DEPT.) Exhibit B 9-1-77 APPLICATION FOR SEVER ALLOCATION PERMIT (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT)DATE 1. Description of Project (Residential, Commercial, Industrial. . etc.): No. of Units, 2.Location of Project: The subject property is generally located on the side of between and 3. Assessor's Number: Book Page Parcels 4. (Please list others at bottom of page) Owner(s): Name Address City State Zip Phone 5. Person(s) responsible for preparation of plans or design: Name Address City State Zip Phone Registration of License No. 6. Applicant: Name Address City State Zip Phone Representing (Company or Corp.): I hereby declare that all information contained within this application and the accompanying attachments has been READ, UNDERSTOOD, AND HAS BEEN ANSWERED CORRECTLY TO TIE BEST OF MY ABILITY. Applicant's Signature X Exhibit C 9-1-77 Rev. 11-15-77 IJESTIONNAIRE FOR APPLICATION' QUALIFICATIONS The following four questions must be answered concerning your project: 1. Is the location of your project inside the infill boundaries as approved by Council, excluding Commercial and Industrial Land Use (the official map is located at the Planning Department)? _ 2. Have all discretionary actions, including all City actions, Coastal Commission, Sanitation and Water District action been completed (proof will be required with submittal of application)? 3. Will the project create any public costs for City facilities such as streets, sewers, etc.? 4. Please indicate if any of the following conditions exist: a) An application for development was applied for prior to April 19, 1977 and the project was delayed as a result of action by the City: Yes_ No b) You or agents of your project have made special money contributions to public agencies in order to develop which cannot now be refunded: Yes No c) The site already has a sewer hookup but needs additional hookups to complete the project: Yes No d) The application is for one single family home on a lot owned by the applicant and legally of record as of April 19, 1977, and this is the only application submitted by the applicant: Yes No e) There exists similar criteria as listed above: Yes No Explain: ^ . Evidence in support of affirmative responses should be referenced or attached. Date Signature Exhibit E 10-18-77 RATING SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE for INDUSTRIAL - COMMERCIAL LAND USES Please answer the following questions. Additional pages showing evidence in support of the points indicated may be attached. 1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices listed below. Please check the devices, if any, \vhich will be incorporated into the project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed below, all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherever appropriate). Faucets Laboratory sink aerators (flow restrictors) 2% ^_ Spring loaded faucet 5% Quick heat lavatory faucet 5%~~ Showers Thermostatic mixing valve 4% Flow control head for in-line restrictor 4% No showers included in project 8% Hot Water Pipes Insulation 5% : Recirculating (convection or forced) 8% Toilets ~~ Flush valve (1" line) 15% POINTS % WATER REDUCTION 0 0-4% 1 5-9% 2 10 - 14% 3 15 - 19% 4 20 - 24% 5 25 - 29% 6 30 - 34% 7 35 - 39% 8 40 - 44% 9 45 - 47% 10 48% Comments or Explanation 2. Points will be given based on the following methods to conserve energy. Please check the devices, if any, which will be incorporated into the project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed below, all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherever appropriate). Pilot Lights for Furnaces Electro-spark 5%_ Windows Thermopane 10% Solar Heating Hot Water Augment 5% Building Heating % by Engineering Design POINTS %_ENERGY CONSERVATION 0 No energy conservation considerations 1 1-5% 2 6 - 101 3 11 - 15% 4 16 - 20% 5 21 - 25% 6 26 - 30% .7 31 - 35% 8 36 - 40% 9 ' 41 - 45% 10 46%+ Comments or Explanation 3. Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent by sig- nificant amounts? (Circle appropriate points that you believe your project should be allotted). 0 - No reduction 1 - Up to 2% 2 - 4 3 - 6% 4 - 8% 5 - 10% 6 - 12% 7 - 14% 8 - 16% 9 - 18% 10 - Over 18% Comments or Explanation - z ~ Does the project remove or rehabilitate older dilapidated structures within the community of a non-historic nature? * 0 - Land Vacant 3 - Rehabilitation 5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure * - Structure is defined as any main building on a lot Does the proposed project participate in a capital project listed on the City Council's approved Capital Improvement Program? POINTS 0 - No 5 - Partially completes a capital project 10 - Completes a capital project Comments or Explanation 6. Will the Droject require less than 50% of the sewer capability that is available in its land use type? 0 - 50% and over 1 - 40% - 49.99% 2 - 30% - 39.99% 3 - 20% - 29.99% 4 - 10% - 19.99% 5 - 5% - 9.99% 6 - 2% - 4.99% 7 - 0% - 1.99% Comments or Exnalantion 7. Will the project provide substantial assessed value to the City? POINTS RECEIVED QUARTILE 0 Bottom 25% of Projects 3 Third 25% of Projects 6 Second 25% of Projects 9 Top 25% of Projects METHOD: Projects shall be arrayed from highest to lowest building valuations. Building evaluation for each project shall be computed multiplying the square footage of building area in each project by the appropri- ate construction cost factors set forth in the Building Department Valuation Tables. Comments - 3 - GENERAL COMMERCIAL ONLY (Not part of rating for office uses) 8. Will the project provide substantial taxable sales to the City? POINTS RECEIVED OUARTILE 0 Bottom 25% of Projects 3 Third 251 of Projects 6 Second 25% of Projects 9 Top 25% of Projects METHOD: Projects shall be arrayed from highest to lowest potential taxable sales. Potential taxable sales for each project shall be computed by multiplying the squarefootage of gross leasible building area in each project by the following factors: USE TAXABLE SALES PER SQUARE FOOT OF BUILDING (S) Regional Shopping Center 90 Community § Neighborhood Commercial Center 60 Specialty Store 100 - Discount Store 80 Furniture and Appliances 60 Furnishings 60 T.V., Stereo, Records 120 Building Supplies 90 Paint and Wallpaper 120 Auto Service and Supplies 80 Dinner Restaurant 140 Coffee Shop 120 Fast Food 250 Mini-Supermarket 40 Car Dealership - set amount of $1.8 million Comments - 4 - TIE BREAKING RATING POINT SYSTEM INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL In case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may be applied as a tie breaker: 1. Distance to public transportation system Points 0 1 2 3 4 Fire Response Time Points 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Comments % mile + 3/8 to % mile \ to 3/8 mile 1/8 to % mile 0 to 1/8 mile No access Over 6 minutes 5 to 6 minutes 4 to 5 minutes 3 to 4 minutes 2 to 3 minutes 1 to 2 minutes 0 to 1 minute - 5 - Exhibit F 10-18-77 Rev. 11-15-77 RATING SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE for RESIDENTIAL LAND USE Please answer the following questions. Additional pages showing evidence in support of the points indicated may be attached. 1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices listed below. Please check the devices if any which will be incorporated into the project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed below, all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherever approp- riate) . Faucets Kitchen .sink aerator (flow restrictors) 2% Lavatory sink aerator (flow restrictors) 3% Quick heat lavatory faucet 5% Showers Thermostatic mixing valve Flow control head or in-line restrictor 1 Hot Water Pipes Insulation 101 Recirculating (convection or forced) 15%~ Appliances Cycle adjust dishwasher (built-in) 2% POINTS % WATER REDUCTION 0 0-41 1 5-9% 2 10 - 14% 3 15 - 19% 4 20 - 24% 5 25 - 29% 6 30 - 34% 7 35 - 39% 8 40 - 44% 9 45 - 49% 10 50 - 57% Comments or Explanation 2. Points will be given based on the following methods to conserve energy. Please check the devices if any which will be incorporated into the project. (To receive points for any fixture as listed below, all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherexrer appropriate) . Pilot Lights (for furnaces and stoves) Electro -spark 5% _ Windows Thermopane 101 _ Solar Heating Hot water augment 10% Building heating % T>yTEgineering Design_ POINTS I ENERGY CONSERVATION 0 No energy conservation considerations 1 1-5% 2 6-10% 3 11 - 15% 4 16 - 20% 5 21 - 25% • 6 26 - 30% 7 31 - 35% 8 . 36 - 40% 9 41 - 45% 10 46%+ Comments or Explanation 3. Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent by sig- nificant amounts? (Circle appropriate points that you believe your pro- ject should be allotted). 0 - No reduction 1 - Up to 2% 2 - 4% 3 - 6% 4 - 8% 5 - 10% 6 - 12% 7 - 14% 8 - 16% 9 - 18% 10 - Over 18% Comments or Explanation Does the project remove or rehabilitate older dilapidated structures within the community of a non-historic nature?* 0 - Land Vacant 3 - Rehabilitation 5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure * - Structure is defined as any main building on a lot Does the proposed project participate in a capital project listed on the City Council's approved Capital Improvement Program? POINTS 0 - No 5 - Partially completes a capital project 10 - Completes a capital project Comments or Explanation 6. Will the project require less than 50% of the sewer capability that is avail- able in its land use type? 0 - 50% and over 1 - 40% - 49.99% 2 - 30% - 39.99% •-• 3 - 20% - 29.99% 4 - 10% - 19.99% 5 - 5% - 9.99% 6 - 2% - 4.99% 7 - 0% - 1.99% Comments or Explanation - 3 - TIE BREAKING RATING POINT .SYSTEM In case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may be applied as a tie breaker: 1. Distance to Parks and Recreation Points 0 1 2 3 4 % mile + 3/8 to % mile % to 3/8 mile 1/8 to % mile 0 to 1/8 mile 3/8 to h mile % to 3/8 mile 1/8 to % mile 0 to 1/8 mile Distance to public transportation system Points. . 0 1 2 3 4 Fire Response Time Points 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Comments No access Over 6 minutes 6 minutes5 to 4 to minutes to 4 minutes to 3 minutes minutes minutes to to - 4 - FIRST PHASE SHIVER ALLOCATION To the best of my knowledge, 1117 proposed project will not require any public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets, sewers, etc. I understand that if it is determined by City staff that my project will re- quire such public costs, my application will be disqualified from consider- ation and my application fees will not be refunded. ~Applicants Signature Log No.