HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-02-07; City Council; 5158-5; 2nd revision - 1st ph sewer allocation systemSUBJECT:
SECOND REVISION - THE FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM
On December 20, 1977 the City Council allocated sewer capacity to those projects
which qualified under-the First Phase Sewer Allocation System. There was
additional capacity left in the following land use categories: Single Family,
Residential, Multiple Family Residential, Office Commercial, General Commercial
and Industrial.
On January 3, 1978 the Council Sewer Committee recommended that the remaining
capacity in the land use categories of Single Family Residential, Multiple
Family Residential, Office Commercial and General Commercial should be given
out and that the Industrial capacity should be held for. Council consideration
similar to the community facilities and contingency categories.. The Council Sewer
Committee recommended that qualification No. 4 be deleted from the required
qualifiers; make certain minor changes and interpretation learned from the
First Phase Sewer Allocation System, and reopen the application period for two
weeks to all’ow additional applications to be submitted as well as permitting ’
those who have already submitted an opportunity to review their applications.
Council concurred with the recommendation of the Council Sewer Committee and
ordered ‘stagf to prepare the proper documentation to accomplish this recommendation.
/ 0
EXHIBITS
Ivlemorandum to City Council from Mr. Hagaman dated 1/26/78.
Application for Second Revision - First Phase Sewer Allocation System
.’ Resolution No. 5Jb.g
RECOMMENDATIOIJ
If City Council concurs with the attached Resolution, request staff to reopen
the First Phase Sewer Allocation System for a period of two weeks beginning
February 20 and ending 5:OO P.M. March 3, 1978 for the purpose of disposing of
the remaining capacity allocated for the First Phase Sewer Allocation System.
Council action
2-8-78 The Council accepted staff recommendation and Resolution #5303
was adopted, approving a second revision to the First Phase
sewer allocation system.
FORM PLANNING 73
1
January 26, 1978
TO :
FROM:
S UB JECT :
City Council
James Hagaman, Planning Director
Second Revision - First Phase Sewer Allocation System
The City Council on December 20, 1977 allocated sewer capacity to those projects
which qualified under the First Phase Sewer Allocation System. After allocating
sewer capacity to the projects it was found that there was additional capacity
left in the following land use categories: Single Family Residential (43 EDU's),
Multiple Family Residential (10 EDU' s) , Office Commercial (14 EDU' S) , General
Commercial (26 EDU's) and Industrial (81 EDU's).
Subsequently, the City Council Sewer Committee met to consider what steps, if any,
should be taken in allocating the capacity that remained in the First Phase Sewer
Allocation System.
Committee was given in an oral report on January 3, 1978. The Committee recommended
that the remaining capacity in the land use categories of Single Family Residential,
Multiple Family Residential, Office Commercial and General Commercial should be
given out and that the Industrial capacity should be held for Council consideration
similar to the community facilities and contingency categories.
A recommendation to the City Council from the Council Sewer
It was recommended that qualification No. 4 be deleted from the required qualifiers
to be eligible for consideration under the second revision of the first phase
system which would leave the following physical qualifications:
1.
2.
3.
It
No residential project will be eligible for consideration that is outside of the
infill area as shown on the map marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a
part hereof. Commercial and industrial land uses may be considered anywhere
within the City's sewer service area.
With the exception of City building or sewer permits, all approvals, including
City Council action and other agency approvals, such as the California Coastal
Commission and Sanitation and Water Districts, must have been issued and
proof of such approval must be submitted with the applications. The applicant
must demonstrate that he is ready and able to commence construction of the
project upon receipt of a City building permit.
No public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets,
sewers, etc. are required.
was then felt by the Council Sewer Committee that the point system on each
project would be the qualifying agent for issuing the remaining sewer capacity.
The Committee felt that with certain minor changes and interpretation learned
during the First Phase Sewer Allocation System that the application period
should be reopened for two weeks to allow additional applications to be
submitted, and those who have already submitted an opportunity to review their
applications. The Council concurred with the recommendation of the Council Sewer
Committee and ordered staff to prepare the proper documentation to accomplish
the recommendation.
Attached to this report is a Resolution which would set the Council's decision
in action and a second revision to the First Phase Sewer Allocation System
which has been amended to reflect concerns expressed at the Council Hearing of
December 20, 1977.
JCH: s
3
I
E
1c
11
1:
12
14
It
le
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 5303
' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND REVISION
TO THE FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM ADOPTED
BY RESOLUTION NO. 5199 AS REVISED BY RESOLUTION
NO. 5259 PURSUANT TO SECTION 18.05.030 OF THE
CAR1;SBAD MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has instituted a First Phase Sewer Allocation
System by the adoption of Resolution No. 5199 and revised it by the adoption
of Resolution No. 5259; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on December 20, 1977
authorized an allocation of sewer treatment capacity to certain projects
which qualified pursuant to the said system has by the adoption of
Resolution 5279; and
WHEREAS, this allocation did not use all of sewer treatment capacity
available to the City of Carlsbad in the First Phase Sewer Allocation System;
and
WHEREAS, after study the City Council Sewer Committee reported to the
City Council at their January 3, 1978 meeting that their recommendation was
to further revise the First Phase Sewer Allocation System to allocate the
remaining sewer treatment capacity in land use categories as follows:
Single Family Residential, Multiple Family Residential, Office Commercial and
General Commercial; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the revisions as
recommended by the Sewer Committee are necessary and in the public interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad as follows :
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System, Exhibit "S",
to Resolution 5259, dated November 15, 1977, is hereby superseded by a
Second Revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System as set out in Exhibit
I.
I. , .I
1
2
3
4
5
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
3.7
18
1x9
20
I,
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"S Second Revision" dated February 7, 1978 attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
3. The Second Revised Frist Phase Sewer Allocation System shall be
subject to all the terms and conditions of this Resolution and Resolution
No. 5199.
an adjourned
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at / regular meeting of the Carlsbad
City Council held on the 8th day of Februarv , 1978
by the following vote to wit:
AYES : Councilmen Frazee, Lewis, Packard, Skotnicki and
NOES : None
ABSENT : None
Councilwoman Casler
ATTEST:
I
' (SEAL)
? -. 'I-IIBIT 'IS" SECOND REVISION
- hESOLUTION NO. 5303 FEBRUARY 7, 1978
f
CITY OF CARLSBAD
SECOND REXISION - FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM
I.
11.
Ob j ectives :
The sewer allocation system contained herein is intended to provide
a framework within which the City Council can make some judgments
regarding the allocation of a limited amount of sewer capacity which' may become available. This system is designed to meet the following City objectives:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
To fairly and equitably allocate a limited amount of sewer
capacity among competing demands.
To coordinate development with needed public improvements.
To maintain and enhance levels of City services (infilling).
To preserve and/or enhance the efficiency of service delivery systems to allow time to provide public facilities adequate to meet expanded service needs.
To renew and maintain existing urban areas. .-.
To develop vacant land that is within existing urban areas
and is currently served by public facilities; i.e., streets, water, sewer.
Available Sewer Capacity:
It is estimated that the first phase sewer allocation system revised
will have 210 equivalent dwelling units and 58,333 gallons of sewer
treatment capacity to be considered for allocation. This capacity may be distributed on the,basis of the criteria contained within this document. The amount of sewer capacity required for any particular
project shall be determined on the basis of equivalent dwelling units
according to the established City system in that regard.
\
111,. Purpose - and Iritent:
A.
B.
C.
D.
The guiding criteria for the application and interpYetat.ion
of this system shall be to maximize the overall community benefits for the City of Carlsbad.
This sewer allocation system is for those portions of the
City of Carlsbad which are located within the Carlsbad
service area.
This sewer allocation system is in part responding to the specific . needs of the community in terms of those persons known or unknown who have Seen caught by the sewer moratorium established April 19, 1977.
The City Council has determined to consider allocating some
or all of the sewer capacity which we may acquire covering
such concerns as: 1) distribution of sewer capacity by percentage to specific land use categories; 2) creating a rating system within the various land use categories; 3)
establishing community benefits for the City of Carl-sbad
as the major allocation criteria; and 4) development of a system to fairly recognize those persons affected by the moratorium of April 19, 1977.
IV. Land Use Distribution:
A.
B.
C.
The following land use distribution of sewer allocation iz
established for this second revision of the first phase
sewer allocation sys'cen.
Remaining E.D.U.'s in First Phase (Eauivalent Dwellins Units)
Commercial Land Use 1. General
2. Office
Single Family Residential Land Use *
Multiple Family Residential Land Use **
26
14
43
10
*Single Family Residential Land Use shall be those dwelling units proposed on legal recorded lots in
the R-1 and R-A zones and dwel-ling units in other
residential 'zones where the density is 7,500 sq. ft. of land per unit or less.
**Multiple Family Residential Land Use shall be all.
dwelling units where the density is greater than one dwelling unit per 7,500,sq. ft.
-. 2 -
Applications 'for sewer permits will be divided by use in accord
with the above categories. Projects in each category will be rated against other projects in the same category and separate .allocations will be made within each 'category. In addition to the above catego'ries, thereare-ee more categories with capacity to be distributed:
D. Industrial Land Use
E. Community Facilities (Includes parks, schools, other
governmental buildings, churches,
hospitals and airports)
F. Contingency
(Includes failing septic tanks
and community development, re- habilitation programs, redevelop- ment areas, capital improvement programs and a reserve capacity for other exceptions to the
sewer moratorium contained in
Section 18.04.170 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Remaining E.D.U.'s in First Phase (Equivalent Dwelling Units)
81
14
22
The Industrial Land Use, Community Facilities and Contingency
categories are desirJried to reserve sewer capacity rather than allocating fixed ammnts immediately as the other land use categories. It is anticipated that between now and when optimum
sewer capacity is available, there will be a continuous need for
capacity in the various land uses identified in these categories.
It may be necessary to establish a separate rating system for
these categories if a high demand occurs; however, at this time, it is anticipated that these will be handled on an "as needed" basis by a case-by-case evaluation by the City Council. The
only exception to the, City Council allocating these categories
based on community need and the public welfare, is that the City Manager shall have authority to issue sewer connection permits for failing septic tank systems.
V. Procedures for Applying for Sewer Permits Under the Skcond Revision of the First Phase Allocation System.
A. It is assumed that there will be more applications for a
sewer allocation than there is available capacity. Therefore,
three qualifications are established which must be satisfied at the time of application in order for the application to be considered.
-3-
It is the judgment of the City Council t.hat only projects which
can meet these qllalifications should.be eligible tc participate
in the allocation under the second revised first phase sewer allucation.
These qualifications are also intended to screen applications in
a preliminary way to provide a reasonable guide to save urmec-”7sa-:y engineering and design costs for a proposed project where there is little chance of the project qualifying for a sewer allocation permit.
The qualifications are as follows:
1. No residential project will be eligible for consideration that is outside of the infill area as shown on the map marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Commercial and industrial land uses may be considered anywhere within the City’s sewer service area.
2. With the exception of City building or sewer permits, all approvals, including City Council action and other agency approvals, such as the California Coastal Commission and
Sanitation and Water Districts, must have been issued and roof of such approval must be submitted with the appli- {ations. The applicant must demonstrate that he is ready
and able to commence construction of the project upon
receipt of a City building permit.
3. No public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets, sewers, etc., are required.
-- - -
B. Applicants for projects which ap5arentAy qualify under the categories listed above, shall. then prepare the followiz7
information as the official application for a second allocation
sewer allocation permit.
1. Documents Required for Submittal :
The .following dicuments are required to provide sufficient infor- mation to accurately rate the application, and to determine if the proposal meets Code requirements. Errors or omissions may cause disqualification.
a) Application. .
b) Questionnaires for qualifi,cation and for rating (Application Attachments).
’ c) Proof in writing that all necessary approvals : involving
the various public agencies have been completed.
d) Two blue line prints of the site plan. The site plan 0 shall contain all information necessary to evaluate
the project under this system as required by the Planning Director.
-4-
e.. ..
e) A written list and explanation of what water, sewer and
energy corisci-vtng material or construction techniques that
are going to be uscd. (Such list will become part of the
record and plans Ktust comply wit11 the list and be to the
satisfaction of the City Building Official. ) In addition all energy conservation efforts requesting points silaii be documented, reviewed and signed by a qualifyin9 engineer
or. similar professional in the field.
f) Application Fees:
the amount of: '*
Thk submittal of a processing fee in
$25 for community facilities
$25 for single family residence
$50 for multiple family residence
$100 for commercial or industrial uses
A fee is not required for applications on file pursuant
to the first revision to the sewer allocation system. The deadline for filtng applications is the close of the business
day on March 3, 1978. Applications shall be filed with the Planning Department.
VI, Staff Evaluation
After the closing date for receipt of applications, a staff committee, consisting of the Public Works Administrator,
City Engheer, Director of Building and Housing and the Director sf Planning, shall eva.Jdate each applicatjon ir!
accordance with the provisions of this section. The committee shall prepare a report for the City Council, The report shall
show which projects in the judgment of the committee meet the
qualifications of Section V. point total for each project based on the staff judgment of
the project's ranking after applying the point system as set out
in the Rating System Questionnaire, a part of Exhibit B, attached
hereto and made a part hereof. In addition, the report shall
rank the projects from the project with the highest total to -
the project with the' logest total for each land use category.
Finally, the report. shall recommend which projects in each
category should receive a sewer allocation permit. The staff
shall report their findings to the City Council within 30 working
days from the deadline for submission of applications. The
committee findings shall be mailed or otherwise made available to
all persons who have applied for a sewer allocation permit before the Council hearing.
The report shall also show a
.
.. . I
*' t -5-
.I
I -~
'V'rI: "City Council Act- ,n. -
The City Clerk shall set a public hearing before the City Council
to consider tha staff committee report. After completion of the
public hearing on the report, the Council shall first consider and
resolve any disagreements between applicants and staff in regards to
the qualifications of Section V, The Council shall then eliminate
from further consideration for permits under this- second allocation all projects which do not meet the Section V qualifications.
The Council shall review the recommendations of the Staff Report in
regards to the point ranking'of qualifying projects within each land
use category. The Council shall have the prerogative of making its own policy interpretations of the rating system in reaching its decision on allocations. If the Council is not satisfied that the results of the rating system meet the objectives and purposes and
intent of the system, The Council may amend it as they consider
necessary in the public interest. When the Council is satisfied with the findings and the ranking of the projects, they shalladopta Sewer list of such projects which shall become the basis for
issuing sewer permits and building permits in the Carlsbad sewer
district boundaries. Inclusion of a project on the approved list
shall constitute authorization pursuant to Municipal Code Section 18.05.030 for the exception of that project from the building moratorium imposed by Chapter 18.05 of the Code.
The Council is under no obligation to allocate all or any part of
the available sewer capacity pursuant to this system. The Council
reserves the right to establish point total cut off within each
land use category as they consider nezessary in order to insure the availeble capacity is used in the best interests of the citizens of Carlsbad. Any capacity which is not allocated as a part of this second revision - first phabeorwhich is allocated but not used, shall
remain in reserve to 52 reallocated as the Council. may determine by the adoption of a second phase system or by the further amendment of
this system.
VIII. Permits and Fees
The successful applicant within the rating system shall be required to perform in the following manner in order to obtain and retain a
sewer permit:
A. A complete building permit application must be filed after
Council action approving the list of projects eligible for
sewer allocations as follows: Commercial and industrial .projects within 45 days. All other projects within 30 days.
The project must be as represented in the -allocation application.
Concurrently with the issuance of a building permit the applicant
shall obtain a,sewer connection permit and pay the fee therefore as required by the Carlsbad Municipal Code. also pay a special sewer allocation permit fee of
EDU for his project. lease cost of the capacity allocated by this system:
B.
Applicant shall
$375 per
The special fee shall be used to pay the
C. The applicant must take out his building, sewer and other
necessary permits within 20 days after mailing of written
notice by the City that plan check is complete and that the bui.lding permit is ready for issuance.
-6-
D.
E.
After issuance of a building permit by the Building Departrneykt,
construction shall. comLer;ce within 30 days and he diligently pursued
without interruption until completed. If constraction 6oes not progress in a reasonably timely way, or is interrupted for any period il; excess of 30 days, the building permit and sewer. permit will be void. All fees shall be non-refundable.
If a building permit is voided, a new building permit may be obtained
which will only be issued-if the pro.ject qualifies for a new sewer
allocation pursuant to-such system that the Council may adopt in the future.
NOTE TO APPLICANTS
This second revision of the first phase sewer allocation system is adopted based on an assumption that the City will have available 58,333 gallons of additional sewer capacity on lease from another member of the Encina Treatment Plant. This assumption is based on Er.gineer's estimates. The true facts are difficult
to determine and the assumptions which underlie the system are
subject to change.
There is no guarantee that a project, which apparently qualifies for an allocation pursuant to this system, will actually receive a
sewer permit. Further, there is no guarantee that the issuance of a sewer allocation permit will insure that capacity will in fact be available at the time of occl-ipancy. The City may not exceed its capacity rights in the plant, and, therefore, mt-c;t b? governed by the actual availability of capacity at the time the
hookup is made. The system is subject to litagation. In the event
of a result unfavoranle to the City, any permits issued pursuant
hereto could be revoked. Efforts by applicants to obtain an allocation permit or perform work pursuant to such permit are at your own risk.
In addition to Pages 1 through 7 hereof, the second revision to the
First Phase Sewer Allocation System shall include the following:
Exhibit A - Infill Map
Exhibit B - Application for Sewer Allocation Permit
Exhibit C - Questionnaire for Application Qualifications
Exhibit E - Rating System Questionnaike: Commercial
Exhibit F - Rating System Questionnaire: Residential
- ,7 -
‘0 C €AN SI 0 E
. AUG. 25.1977.
0 1000 2000 a000 PELT CARlSBAD,eALI FCFWlA
&ZWWX*???x* COASTAL ZONE BOUP!DARY ( FOR EXACT LOCATION CONTACT PLANNING DEPT.)
i.
2.
.3.
4 ..
5.
6.
(Please
! APPLICATION FOR
Print or Type)
SEWER ALLOCATION
EXHIBIT B
9-1-77
PERMIT #
Date
Description of Project (Residential, Commercial, Industrial ...
no. of units, etc.):
c
Location of Project: The subject property is generally located on
the side of between
and
Assessor’s Number: Book Page Parcels
Book Page Tarce 1 s
(Please list others at bottom of page).
“Owner (s) :
Name Address Citv State . Zir, Phone
Person(s) responsible for preparation of plans or design:
Name Address City State Zip Phone
Registration of License No.
Name Address City State Zip Phone
Representing (Company or Corp.) :
I hereby declare that all information contained within this application
and the accompanying attachments have been READ, UNDEXTOOD, AND IIAW
BEEN ANSWERED CORRECTLY TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY.
Applicant's Signature X
Exhibit C
January 16, 1978
Questionnaire for Application Qualifications
The followi.ng threequestions must be answered concerning your project:
1. Is the location of your project inside the infill boundaries as
approved by Council, excluding Commercial and Industrial Land
Use?(The official map.is located at the Planning Department,)
2. Have all approvals, including City Council actions and other
applications such as the California Coastal Commission, Sani-tation and Water District been comy?leted? !In order to document -- this . - qualification,proof must be submitted and attached to this application.)
3. Will the project create any public costs for City facilities such as streets, sewers, etc.?
TO the best of my knowledge, my proposed project will not require
any public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets, sewers, etc. I understand that if it is determined
by City staff that my project will require such public costs, my
application will be disqualified from consideration and my application
fees will not he refunded.
Applicant's Signature
LOG NO.
,'
.- A Exhibit E
10/18/77
RATING SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE I -- -----
for - -I
COMMERCIAL LAND IJSES
Please answer the following questions. Additional pages showing
evidence in support of the points indicated may be attached.
1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices listed below. Please check the devices, if any, which will be
incorporated into the project. (To receive points for any
fixture as liste'd below, all such fixtures in the structure
shall be so equipped wherever appropriate.)
C
.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
a
Faucets
Laboratory sink aerators (flow restrictors) Spring loaded faucet Quick heat lavatory faucet
Thermostatic mixing valve
Flow control head or in-line restrictor .
No showers included in project
Showers
Hot Water Pipes
Toilets
. Insulation Rwirculating (convection or forced)
Flush valve (1' line)
POINTS % WATER REDUCTION
0-4%
5-9% 10-14%
15-19% 20-24%
25-29%
30-34%
35-39%
40-44%
45-47%
48%
mment or Explan til
2%
5%
5%
L__-
4% *
4%
8%
5% .
8%
15%
I
2: Points will be gilren based on the following methods to conserve energy.
Please check the devices, if any, which will be incorporated into the project. (To receive po.i.nts for any fixture as listed below, al.1 such
fixtures in tkir structure shall be so equipped wherever applicable.)
Pilot lights for furnaces
Windows
Electro-spark
Thermopane a.
Solar Heating
Hot Water Augment
Building Heating
POINTS
5%
10%
5%
% by Engineering
Design
A clear, documented statement
substantiating the percentage claimed must be included to receive any credit.
% ENERGY CONSERVATION
- . ..
0 No energy conservation considerations ,
1 1-5%
2 6-10%
3 11-15% 4 16-20% 5 21-25%
6 26-30% 7 31-35%
8 36-40% 9 41-45%
10 - 46% -t
Comments or Explanation
3. Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent by significant amounts? (Circle appropria-te points that you believe your project should be allotted.)
0 - No Reduction 1 - up to 2%
2 - 4%
3 - 6% 4 - 8%
5 - 10% 6 - 12% 7 - 14%
8 -.16%
9 - 18%
10 - Over 18%
Comments or Explanation .
..
-2-
.-
4, Does the project remove or rehdbilitate older dilapidated structures
within the coxnixunity of a non-historic nature?*
0 - Land l7acan.t-
3 - Rehabilitation
5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure
*Structure is defined as any main building on a lot.
5. Does the proposed projekt'participate in a capital project listed on the City Council's approved Capital Improvement Program?
POINTS
0 - NO
5 - Partially completes
10 - Completes a capital
Comments or Explanation
a capital project project
6. Will the project require less than 50% of the sewer capability that is available in its land use type?
0 - 50% and over
1 - 40% - 49.99%
2 - 30% - 39.99%
3 - 20% - 29.99%
4 - 10% - 19.99%
5 - 5 -.9.99%
6 - 2 - 4.99%
7. - 0 - 1.99%
Comments or Explanation
7. Will the project provide substantial assessed value to the City?
POINTS RECEIVED QUARTILE
Bottom 25% of Projects Third 25% of Projects Second 25% of Projects
Top 25% of Projects
METHOD: Projects shall be arranged from highest to lowest building
valuations. Building evaluation for each project shall be
computed multiplying the square footage of building area in each project by the appropriate construction cost factors set forth in the Building Department Valuation Tables.
Comments
..
8.
GENERAL COMMERCIAL ONLY --
4 (Not part of rating for office uses)
Will the project provide substantial taxable sales -0 the C
POINTS RECEIVED QUART I LE
ty ?
Bottom 25% of Projects
Third 25% of Projects
Second 25% of Projects
Top 25% of Projects
METHOD: Projects shall be arranged from highest to lowest potential
taxable sales. Potential taxable sales for each project
shall be computed by multiplying the.squarefootage of gross leasible building area in each project by the following factors.
USE FOOT OF BUILDING (S)
TAXABLE SALES PER SQUARE -
Regional Shopping Center 90
Community & Neighborhood Commercial Center 60
Specialty Store 100
Discount Store 80
Furniture and Appliances 60
Furnishings 60
T.V., Stereo, Records 120
Building Supplies 90
Paint and Wallpaper 120
Auto Service and Supplies 80
Dinner Restaurant 14 0
Coffee Shop 120
Fast Food
Mini-Supermarket
250
40
Car Dealership - set amount of. $1.8 million
Comments
-4-
In be
1.
2.
TIE BREAKING RATING .POINT SYSTEM
COMPERCIAL -
case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may applied as a tie breaker:
Distance to public transportation.system
POINTS
1/2 mile -t-
3/8 to 1/2 mile
1/4 to 3/8 mile 1/8 to 1/4 mile
0 to 1/8 mile
Fire Response Time
POINTS
No access
Over 6 minutes
5 to 6 minutes
4 to 5 minutes 3 to 4 minutes
2 'to 3 minutes
1 to 2 minutes
0 to 1 minutes
Comments
-5-
Exhibit F
10/18/77
Revi.sed 11/15/77
I
RATING - SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE:
for
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE
Please answer the following'questions. evidence in support of the points indicated may be attached. Additional pages showing
1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices
listed below. Please check the devices, if any, which will
be incorporated into the project.
fixture as listed below, all such fixtures in the structure
shall be so equipped wherever appropriate.)
(To receive points for any
Faucets
Kitchen sir,k aerator (flow restrictors) 2%
Lavatory sink aerator (flow restrictors) 3%
Quick heat lavatory faucet 5% '
Thermostatic mixing valve , . 5%
Showers
Flow control head or in-line restrictor 15%
Hot Water Pipes
Insulation
Reci-culating (convection or forced)
Cycle adjust dishwasher (built in) Appliances
POINTS --
0
1
2
3 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
% WATER REDUCTION -
0-4%
5-9%
10-1436
15-19% 20-24%
25-2'9 %
30-34%
35-39%
40-44%
45-49%
50-57%
10% 15%
2%
Conunents or Explanation -
- -
2. Points will be given based on the following methods to conserve energy.
Please check tl-e devices, if any, which will be incorporated into the
project. (To'recej-ve points for any fixture as listed below, all such fixtures in thr structure shall be so equipped wherever applicable.)
Pilot lights for furnaces Electro-spark
Windows Thermopane
Solar Heating
Hot Water Augment Building Heating
5%
10%
10%
B by Engineering
Desi.gn
A clear, documented statement substantiating the percentage
claimed must be included to
receive any credit.
POINTS % ENERGY CONSERVATION
0 No energy conservation considerations ' 1 1-5%
2 6-10%
3 11-15% 4 16-20% 5 21-25%
6 26-30%
7 31-35% 8 36-40%
9 41-45%
10 46% +
Comments or Explanation
3. Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent
by significant amounts? believe your project should be allotted.) (Circle appropriate points that you
0 - No Reduction
2 - 4% 3 - 6%
4 - 8%
5 - 10%
. c - 12%
7 - 14%
8 -*16% 9 - 18%
1 - up to 2%
10 - Over 18% Comments or Explanation ..
-2-
,. .
."
4. Does the project remove or rehabilitate oider dilapidated
structures kithin the community of a non-historic nature?*
0 - Land Vacant 3 - Rehabilitation
5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure
*Structure is defined as any main building on a lot
5. Does the proposed project participate in a capital project
listed on the City Council's approved Capital Improvement
Program?
POINTS
0 - NO
5 - Partially completes a capital project
10 - Completes a capital project
Comments or Explanation
6. Will the project require less than 50%of the sewer capability that is available in its land use type?
0 - 50% and over i - ;o - 49.99%
2 - 30 - 39.99%
3 - 20 - 29.99%
4 - 10 .- 19.99%
5 - 5 - 9.99%
6 - 2 - 4.99% 7 - 0 - 1.99%
Comments or Explanation
,. c
,. * . .I'
L
TIE BREAKING RATING POINT SYSTEM
In case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may
be applied as a tie breaker:
1. Distance to Parks and Recreation
POINTS
0 1/2 mile + 1 3/8 to 1/2 mile
2 1/4 to 3/8 mile
3 1/8 to .1/4 mile
4 0 to 1/8 mile
2. Distance to public transportation system
POINTS
0 1/2 mile i-
1 3/8 to 1/2 mile
2 1/4 to 3/8 mile
3 1/8 to 1/4 mile
4 0 to 1/8 mile
3. Fire Response Time
POINTS
No access
Over 6 minutes 5 to 6 minutes
4 to 5 minutes
3 to 4 minutes
2 to 3 minutes
1 to 2 minutes
0 to 1 minutes
Comments
-4-