Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-02-07; City Council; 5158-5; 2nd revision - 1st ph sewer allocation systemSUBJECT: SECOND REVISION - THE FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM On December 20, 1977 the City Council allocated sewer capacity to those projects which qualified under-the First Phase Sewer Allocation System. There was additional capacity left in the following land use categories: Single Family, Residential, Multiple Family Residential, Office Commercial, General Commercial and Industrial. On January 3, 1978 the Council Sewer Committee recommended that the remaining capacity in the land use categories of Single Family Residential, Multiple Family Residential, Office Commercial and General Commercial should be given out and that the Industrial capacity should be held for. Council consideration similar to the community facilities and contingency categories.. The Council Sewer Committee recommended that qualification No. 4 be deleted from the required qualifiers; make certain minor changes and interpretation learned from the First Phase Sewer Allocation System, and reopen the application period for two weeks to all’ow additional applications to be submitted as well as permitting ’ those who have already submitted an opportunity to review their applications. Council concurred with the recommendation of the Council Sewer Committee and ordered ‘stagf to prepare the proper documentation to accomplish this recommendation. / 0 EXHIBITS Ivlemorandum to City Council from Mr. Hagaman dated 1/26/78. Application for Second Revision - First Phase Sewer Allocation System .’ Resolution No. 5Jb.g RECOMMENDATIOIJ If City Council concurs with the attached Resolution, request staff to reopen the First Phase Sewer Allocation System for a period of two weeks beginning February 20 and ending 5:OO P.M. March 3, 1978 for the purpose of disposing of the remaining capacity allocated for the First Phase Sewer Allocation System. Council action 2-8-78 The Council accepted staff recommendation and Resolution #5303 was adopted, approving a second revision to the First Phase sewer allocation system. FORM PLANNING 73 1 January 26, 1978 TO : FROM: S UB JECT : City Council James Hagaman, Planning Director Second Revision - First Phase Sewer Allocation System The City Council on December 20, 1977 allocated sewer capacity to those projects which qualified under the First Phase Sewer Allocation System. After allocating sewer capacity to the projects it was found that there was additional capacity left in the following land use categories: Single Family Residential (43 EDU's), Multiple Family Residential (10 EDU' s) , Office Commercial (14 EDU' S) , General Commercial (26 EDU's) and Industrial (81 EDU's). Subsequently, the City Council Sewer Committee met to consider what steps, if any, should be taken in allocating the capacity that remained in the First Phase Sewer Allocation System. Committee was given in an oral report on January 3, 1978. The Committee recommended that the remaining capacity in the land use categories of Single Family Residential, Multiple Family Residential, Office Commercial and General Commercial should be given out and that the Industrial capacity should be held for Council consideration similar to the community facilities and contingency categories. A recommendation to the City Council from the Council Sewer It was recommended that qualification No. 4 be deleted from the required qualifiers to be eligible for consideration under the second revision of the first phase system which would leave the following physical qualifications: 1. 2. 3. It No residential project will be eligible for consideration that is outside of the infill area as shown on the map marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Commercial and industrial land uses may be considered anywhere within the City's sewer service area. With the exception of City building or sewer permits, all approvals, including City Council action and other agency approvals, such as the California Coastal Commission and Sanitation and Water Districts, must have been issued and proof of such approval must be submitted with the applications. The applicant must demonstrate that he is ready and able to commence construction of the project upon receipt of a City building permit. No public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets, sewers, etc. are required. was then felt by the Council Sewer Committee that the point system on each project would be the qualifying agent for issuing the remaining sewer capacity. The Committee felt that with certain minor changes and interpretation learned during the First Phase Sewer Allocation System that the application period should be reopened for two weeks to allow additional applications to be submitted, and those who have already submitted an opportunity to review their applications. The Council concurred with the recommendation of the Council Sewer Committee and ordered staff to prepare the proper documentation to accomplish the recommendation. Attached to this report is a Resolution which would set the Council's decision in action and a second revision to the First Phase Sewer Allocation System which has been amended to reflect concerns expressed at the Council Hearing of December 20, 1977. JCH: s 3 I E 1c 11 1: 12 14 It le 17 ia 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 5303 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND REVISION TO THE FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 5199 AS REVISED BY RESOLUTION NO. 5259 PURSUANT TO SECTION 18.05.030 OF THE CAR1;SBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, the City Council has instituted a First Phase Sewer Allocation System by the adoption of Resolution No. 5199 and revised it by the adoption of Resolution No. 5259; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on December 20, 1977 authorized an allocation of sewer treatment capacity to certain projects which qualified pursuant to the said system has by the adoption of Resolution 5279; and WHEREAS, this allocation did not use all of sewer treatment capacity available to the City of Carlsbad in the First Phase Sewer Allocation System; and WHEREAS, after study the City Council Sewer Committee reported to the City Council at their January 3, 1978 meeting that their recommendation was to further revise the First Phase Sewer Allocation System to allocate the remaining sewer treatment capacity in land use categories as follows: Single Family Residential, Multiple Family Residential, Office Commercial and General Commercial; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the revisions as recommended by the Sewer Committee are necessary and in the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows : 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System, Exhibit "S", to Resolution 5259, dated November 15, 1977, is hereby superseded by a Second Revised First Phase Sewer Allocation System as set out in Exhibit I. I. , .I 1 2 3 4 5 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 3.7 18 1x9 20 I, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "S Second Revision" dated February 7, 1978 attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. The Second Revised Frist Phase Sewer Allocation System shall be subject to all the terms and conditions of this Resolution and Resolution No. 5199. an adjourned PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at / regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council held on the 8th day of Februarv , 1978 by the following vote to wit: AYES : Councilmen Frazee, Lewis, Packard, Skotnicki and NOES : None ABSENT : None Councilwoman Casler ATTEST: I ' (SEAL) ? -. 'I-IIBIT 'IS" SECOND REVISION - hESOLUTION NO. 5303 FEBRUARY 7, 1978 f CITY OF CARLSBAD SECOND REXISION - FIRST PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM I. 11. Ob j ectives : The sewer allocation system contained herein is intended to provide a framework within which the City Council can make some judgments regarding the allocation of a limited amount of sewer capacity which' may become available. This system is designed to meet the following City objectives: A. B. C. D. E. F. To fairly and equitably allocate a limited amount of sewer capacity among competing demands. To coordinate development with needed public improvements. To maintain and enhance levels of City services (infilling). To preserve and/or enhance the efficiency of service delivery systems to allow time to provide public facilities adequate to meet expanded service needs. To renew and maintain existing urban areas. .-. To develop vacant land that is within existing urban areas and is currently served by public facilities; i.e., streets, water, sewer. Available Sewer Capacity: It is estimated that the first phase sewer allocation system revised will have 210 equivalent dwelling units and 58,333 gallons of sewer treatment capacity to be considered for allocation. This capacity may be distributed on the,basis of the criteria contained within this document. The amount of sewer capacity required for any particular project shall be determined on the basis of equivalent dwelling units according to the established City system in that regard. \ 111,. Purpose - and Iritent: A. B. C. D. The guiding criteria for the application and interpYetat.ion of this system shall be to maximize the overall community benefits for the City of Carlsbad. This sewer allocation system is for those portions of the City of Carlsbad which are located within the Carlsbad service area. This sewer allocation system is in part responding to the specific . needs of the community in terms of those persons known or unknown who have Seen caught by the sewer moratorium established April 19, 1977. The City Council has determined to consider allocating some or all of the sewer capacity which we may acquire covering such concerns as: 1) distribution of sewer capacity by percentage to specific land use categories; 2) creating a rating system within the various land use categories; 3) establishing community benefits for the City of Carl-sbad as the major allocation criteria; and 4) development of a system to fairly recognize those persons affected by the moratorium of April 19, 1977. IV. Land Use Distribution: A. B. C. The following land use distribution of sewer allocation iz established for this second revision of the first phase sewer allocation sys'cen. Remaining E.D.U.'s in First Phase (Eauivalent Dwellins Units) Commercial Land Use 1. General 2. Office Single Family Residential Land Use * Multiple Family Residential Land Use ** 26 14 43 10 *Single Family Residential Land Use shall be those dwelling units proposed on legal recorded lots in the R-1 and R-A zones and dwel-ling units in other residential 'zones where the density is 7,500 sq. ft. of land per unit or less. **Multiple Family Residential Land Use shall be all. dwelling units where the density is greater than one dwelling unit per 7,500,sq. ft. -. 2 - Applications 'for sewer permits will be divided by use in accord with the above categories. Projects in each category will be rated against other projects in the same category and separate .allocations will be made within each 'category. In addition to the above catego'ries, thereare-ee more categories with capacity to be distributed: D. Industrial Land Use E. Community Facilities (Includes parks, schools, other governmental buildings, churches, hospitals and airports) F. Contingency (Includes failing septic tanks and community development, re- habilitation programs, redevelop- ment areas, capital improvement programs and a reserve capacity for other exceptions to the sewer moratorium contained in Section 18.04.170 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Remaining E.D.U.'s in First Phase (Equivalent Dwelling Units) 81 14 22 The Industrial Land Use, Community Facilities and Contingency categories are desirJried to reserve sewer capacity rather than allocating fixed ammnts immediately as the other land use categories. It is anticipated that between now and when optimum sewer capacity is available, there will be a continuous need for capacity in the various land uses identified in these categories. It may be necessary to establish a separate rating system for these categories if a high demand occurs; however, at this time, it is anticipated that these will be handled on an "as needed" basis by a case-by-case evaluation by the City Council. The only exception to the, City Council allocating these categories based on community need and the public welfare, is that the City Manager shall have authority to issue sewer connection permits for failing septic tank systems. V. Procedures for Applying for Sewer Permits Under the Skcond Revision of the First Phase Allocation System. A. It is assumed that there will be more applications for a sewer allocation than there is available capacity. Therefore, three qualifications are established which must be satisfied at the time of application in order for the application to be considered. -3- It is the judgment of the City Council t.hat only projects which can meet these qllalifications should.be eligible tc participate in the allocation under the second revised first phase sewer allucation. These qualifications are also intended to screen applications in a preliminary way to provide a reasonable guide to save urmec-”7sa-:y engineering and design costs for a proposed project where there is little chance of the project qualifying for a sewer allocation permit. The qualifications are as follows: 1. No residential project will be eligible for consideration that is outside of the infill area as shown on the map marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Commercial and industrial land uses may be considered anywhere within the City’s sewer service area. 2. With the exception of City building or sewer permits, all approvals, including City Council action and other agency approvals, such as the California Coastal Commission and Sanitation and Water Districts, must have been issued and roof of such approval must be submitted with the appli- {ations. The applicant must demonstrate that he is ready and able to commence construction of the project upon receipt of a City building permit. 3. No public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets, sewers, etc., are required. -- - - B. Applicants for projects which ap5arentAy qualify under the categories listed above, shall. then prepare the followiz7 information as the official application for a second allocation sewer allocation permit. 1. Documents Required for Submittal : The .following dicuments are required to provide sufficient infor- mation to accurately rate the application, and to determine if the proposal meets Code requirements. Errors or omissions may cause disqualification. a) Application. . b) Questionnaires for qualifi,cation and for rating (Application Attachments). ’ c) Proof in writing that all necessary approvals : involving the various public agencies have been completed. d) Two blue line prints of the site plan. The site plan 0 shall contain all information necessary to evaluate the project under this system as required by the Planning Director. -4- e.. .. e) A written list and explanation of what water, sewer and energy corisci-vtng material or construction techniques that are going to be uscd. (Such list will become part of the record and plans Ktust comply wit11 the list and be to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. ) In addition all energy conservation efforts requesting points silaii be documented, reviewed and signed by a qualifyin9 engineer or. similar professional in the field. f) Application Fees: the amount of: '* Thk submittal of a processing fee in $25 for community facilities $25 for single family residence $50 for multiple family residence $100 for commercial or industrial uses A fee is not required for applications on file pursuant to the first revision to the sewer allocation system. The deadline for filtng applications is the close of the business day on March 3, 1978. Applications shall be filed with the Planning Department. VI, Staff Evaluation After the closing date for receipt of applications, a staff committee, consisting of the Public Works Administrator, City Engheer, Director of Building and Housing and the Director sf Planning, shall eva.Jdate each applicatjon ir! accordance with the provisions of this section. The committee shall prepare a report for the City Council, The report shall show which projects in the judgment of the committee meet the qualifications of Section V. point total for each project based on the staff judgment of the project's ranking after applying the point system as set out in the Rating System Questionnaire, a part of Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof. In addition, the report shall rank the projects from the project with the highest total to - the project with the' logest total for each land use category. Finally, the report. shall recommend which projects in each category should receive a sewer allocation permit. The staff shall report their findings to the City Council within 30 working days from the deadline for submission of applications. The committee findings shall be mailed or otherwise made available to all persons who have applied for a sewer allocation permit before the Council hearing. The report shall also show a . .. . I *' t -5- .I I -~ 'V'rI: "City Council Act- ,n. - The City Clerk shall set a public hearing before the City Council to consider tha staff committee report. After completion of the public hearing on the report, the Council shall first consider and resolve any disagreements between applicants and staff in regards to the qualifications of Section V, The Council shall then eliminate from further consideration for permits under this- second allocation all projects which do not meet the Section V qualifications. The Council shall review the recommendations of the Staff Report in regards to the point ranking'of qualifying projects within each land use category. The Council shall have the prerogative of making its own policy interpretations of the rating system in reaching its decision on allocations. If the Council is not satisfied that the results of the rating system meet the objectives and purposes and intent of the system, The Council may amend it as they consider necessary in the public interest. When the Council is satisfied with the findings and the ranking of the projects, they shalladopta Sewer list of such projects which shall become the basis for issuing sewer permits and building permits in the Carlsbad sewer district boundaries. Inclusion of a project on the approved list shall constitute authorization pursuant to Municipal Code Section 18.05.030 for the exception of that project from the building moratorium imposed by Chapter 18.05 of the Code. The Council is under no obligation to allocate all or any part of the available sewer capacity pursuant to this system. The Council reserves the right to establish point total cut off within each land use category as they consider nezessary in order to insure the availeble capacity is used in the best interests of the citizens of Carlsbad. Any capacity which is not allocated as a part of this second revision - first phabeorwhich is allocated but not used, shall remain in reserve to 52 reallocated as the Council. may determine by the adoption of a second phase system or by the further amendment of this system. VIII. Permits and Fees The successful applicant within the rating system shall be required to perform in the following manner in order to obtain and retain a sewer permit: A. A complete building permit application must be filed after Council action approving the list of projects eligible for sewer allocations as follows: Commercial and industrial .projects within 45 days. All other projects within 30 days. The project must be as represented in the -allocation application. Concurrently with the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall obtain a,sewer connection permit and pay the fee therefore as required by the Carlsbad Municipal Code. also pay a special sewer allocation permit fee of EDU for his project. lease cost of the capacity allocated by this system: B. Applicant shall $375 per The special fee shall be used to pay the C. The applicant must take out his building, sewer and other necessary permits within 20 days after mailing of written notice by the City that plan check is complete and that the bui.lding permit is ready for issuance. -6- D. E. After issuance of a building permit by the Building Departrneykt, construction shall. comLer;ce within 30 days and he diligently pursued without interruption until completed. If constraction 6oes not progress in a reasonably timely way, or is interrupted for any period il; excess of 30 days, the building permit and sewer. permit will be void. All fees shall be non-refundable. If a building permit is voided, a new building permit may be obtained which will only be issued-if the pro.ject qualifies for a new sewer allocation pursuant to-such system that the Council may adopt in the future. NOTE TO APPLICANTS This second revision of the first phase sewer allocation system is adopted based on an assumption that the City will have available 58,333 gallons of additional sewer capacity on lease from another member of the Encina Treatment Plant. This assumption is based on Er.gineer's estimates. The true facts are difficult to determine and the assumptions which underlie the system are subject to change. There is no guarantee that a project, which apparently qualifies for an allocation pursuant to this system, will actually receive a sewer permit. Further, there is no guarantee that the issuance of a sewer allocation permit will insure that capacity will in fact be available at the time of occl-ipancy. The City may not exceed its capacity rights in the plant, and, therefore, mt-c;t b? governed by the actual availability of capacity at the time the hookup is made. The system is subject to litagation. In the event of a result unfavoranle to the City, any permits issued pursuant hereto could be revoked. Efforts by applicants to obtain an allocation permit or perform work pursuant to such permit are at your own risk. In addition to Pages 1 through 7 hereof, the second revision to the First Phase Sewer Allocation System shall include the following: Exhibit A - Infill Map Exhibit B - Application for Sewer Allocation Permit Exhibit C - Questionnaire for Application Qualifications Exhibit E - Rating System Questionnaike: Commercial Exhibit F - Rating System Questionnaire: Residential - ,7 - ‘0 C €AN SI 0 E . AUG. 25.1977. 0 1000 2000 a000 PELT CARlSBAD,eALI FCFWlA &ZWWX*???x* COASTAL ZONE BOUP!DARY ( FOR EXACT LOCATION CONTACT PLANNING DEPT.) i. 2. .3. 4 .. 5. 6. (Please ! APPLICATION FOR Print or Type) SEWER ALLOCATION EXHIBIT B 9-1-77 PERMIT # Date Description of Project (Residential, Commercial, Industrial ... no. of units, etc.): c Location of Project: The subject property is generally located on the side of between and Assessor’s Number: Book Page Parcels Book Page Tarce 1 s (Please list others at bottom of page). “Owner (s) : Name Address Citv State . Zir, Phone Person(s) responsible for preparation of plans or design: Name Address City State Zip Phone Registration of License No. Name Address City State Zip Phone Representing (Company or Corp.) : I hereby declare that all information contained within this application and the accompanying attachments have been READ, UNDEXTOOD, AND IIAW BEEN ANSWERED CORRECTLY TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY. Applicant's Signature X Exhibit C January 16, 1978 Questionnaire for Application Qualifications The followi.ng threequestions must be answered concerning your project: 1. Is the location of your project inside the infill boundaries as approved by Council, excluding Commercial and Industrial Land Use?(The official map.is located at the Planning Department,) 2. Have all approvals, including City Council actions and other applications such as the California Coastal Commission, Sani-tation and Water District been comy?leted? !In order to document -- this . - qualification,proof must be submitted and attached to this application.) 3. Will the project create any public costs for City facilities such as streets, sewers, etc.? TO the best of my knowledge, my proposed project will not require any public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets, sewers, etc. I understand that if it is determined by City staff that my project will require such public costs, my application will be disqualified from consideration and my application fees will not he refunded. Applicant's Signature LOG NO. ,' .- A Exhibit E 10/18/77 RATING SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE I -- ----- for - -I COMMERCIAL LAND IJSES Please answer the following questions. Additional pages showing evidence in support of the points indicated may be attached. 1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices listed below. Please check the devices, if any, which will be incorporated into the project. (To receive points for any fixture as liste'd below, all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherever appropriate.) C . 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 a Faucets Laboratory sink aerators (flow restrictors) Spring loaded faucet Quick heat lavatory faucet Thermostatic mixing valve Flow control head or in-line restrictor . No showers included in project Showers Hot Water Pipes Toilets . Insulation Rwirculating (convection or forced) Flush valve (1' line) POINTS % WATER REDUCTION 0-4% 5-9% 10-14% 15-19% 20-24% 25-29% 30-34% 35-39% 40-44% 45-47% 48% mment or Explan til 2% 5% 5% L__- 4% * 4% 8% 5% . 8% 15% I 2: Points will be gilren based on the following methods to conserve energy. Please check the devices, if any, which will be incorporated into the project. (To receive po.i.nts for any fixture as listed below, al.1 such fixtures in tkir structure shall be so equipped wherever applicable.) Pilot lights for furnaces Windows Electro-spark Thermopane a. Solar Heating Hot Water Augment Building Heating POINTS 5% 10% 5% % by Engineering Design A clear, documented statement substantiating the percentage claimed must be included to receive any credit. % ENERGY CONSERVATION - . .. 0 No energy conservation considerations , 1 1-5% 2 6-10% 3 11-15% 4 16-20% 5 21-25% 6 26-30% 7 31-35% 8 36-40% 9 41-45% 10 - 46% -t Comments or Explanation 3. Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent by significant amounts? (Circle appropria-te points that you believe your project should be allotted.) 0 - No Reduction 1 - up to 2% 2 - 4% 3 - 6% 4 - 8% 5 - 10% 6 - 12% 7 - 14% 8 -.16% 9 - 18% 10 - Over 18% Comments or Explanation . .. -2- .- 4, Does the project remove or rehdbilitate older dilapidated structures within the coxnixunity of a non-historic nature?* 0 - Land l7acan.t- 3 - Rehabilitation 5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure *Structure is defined as any main building on a lot. 5. Does the proposed projekt'participate in a capital project listed on the City Council's approved Capital Improvement Program? POINTS 0 - NO 5 - Partially completes 10 - Completes a capital Comments or Explanation a capital project project 6. Will the project require less than 50% of the sewer capability that is available in its land use type? 0 - 50% and over 1 - 40% - 49.99% 2 - 30% - 39.99% 3 - 20% - 29.99% 4 - 10% - 19.99% 5 - 5 -.9.99% 6 - 2 - 4.99% 7. - 0 - 1.99% Comments or Explanation 7. Will the project provide substantial assessed value to the City? POINTS RECEIVED QUARTILE Bottom 25% of Projects Third 25% of Projects Second 25% of Projects Top 25% of Projects METHOD: Projects shall be arranged from highest to lowest building valuations. Building evaluation for each project shall be computed multiplying the square footage of building area in each project by the appropriate construction cost factors set forth in the Building Department Valuation Tables. Comments .. 8. GENERAL COMMERCIAL ONLY -- 4 (Not part of rating for office uses) Will the project provide substantial taxable sales -0 the C POINTS RECEIVED QUART I LE ty ? Bottom 25% of Projects Third 25% of Projects Second 25% of Projects Top 25% of Projects METHOD: Projects shall be arranged from highest to lowest potential taxable sales. Potential taxable sales for each project shall be computed by multiplying the.squarefootage of gross leasible building area in each project by the following factors. USE FOOT OF BUILDING (S) TAXABLE SALES PER SQUARE - Regional Shopping Center 90 Community & Neighborhood Commercial Center 60 Specialty Store 100 Discount Store 80 Furniture and Appliances 60 Furnishings 60 T.V., Stereo, Records 120 Building Supplies 90 Paint and Wallpaper 120 Auto Service and Supplies 80 Dinner Restaurant 14 0 Coffee Shop 120 Fast Food Mini-Supermarket 250 40 Car Dealership - set amount of. $1.8 million Comments -4- In be 1. 2. TIE BREAKING RATING .POINT SYSTEM COMPERCIAL - case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may applied as a tie breaker: Distance to public transportation.system POINTS 1/2 mile -t- 3/8 to 1/2 mile 1/4 to 3/8 mile 1/8 to 1/4 mile 0 to 1/8 mile Fire Response Time POINTS No access Over 6 minutes 5 to 6 minutes 4 to 5 minutes 3 to 4 minutes 2 'to 3 minutes 1 to 2 minutes 0 to 1 minutes Comments -5- Exhibit F 10/18/77 Revi.sed 11/15/77 I RATING - SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE: for RESIDENTIAL LAND USE Please answer the following'questions. evidence in support of the points indicated may be attached. Additional pages showing 1. Points will be given for certain water saving devices listed below. Please check the devices, if any, which will be incorporated into the project. fixture as listed below, all such fixtures in the structure shall be so equipped wherever appropriate.) (To receive points for any Faucets Kitchen sir,k aerator (flow restrictors) 2% Lavatory sink aerator (flow restrictors) 3% Quick heat lavatory faucet 5% ' Thermostatic mixing valve , . 5% Showers Flow control head or in-line restrictor 15% Hot Water Pipes Insulation Reci-culating (convection or forced) Cycle adjust dishwasher (built in) Appliances POINTS -- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 % WATER REDUCTION - 0-4% 5-9% 10-1436 15-19% 20-24% 25-2'9 % 30-34% 35-39% 40-44% 45-49% 50-57% 10% 15% 2% Conunents or Explanation - - - 2. Points will be given based on the following methods to conserve energy. Please check tl-e devices, if any, which will be incorporated into the project. (To'recej-ve points for any fixture as listed below, all such fixtures in thr structure shall be so equipped wherever applicable.) Pilot lights for furnaces Electro-spark Windows Thermopane Solar Heating Hot Water Augment Building Heating 5% 10% 10% B by Engineering Desi.gn A clear, documented statement substantiating the percentage claimed must be included to receive any credit. POINTS % ENERGY CONSERVATION 0 No energy conservation considerations ' 1 1-5% 2 6-10% 3 11-15% 4 16-20% 5 21-25% 6 26-30% 7 31-35% 8 36-40% 9 41-45% 10 46% + Comments or Explanation 3. Does the project incorporate facilities to reduce sewer effluent by significant amounts? believe your project should be allotted.) (Circle appropriate points that you 0 - No Reduction 2 - 4% 3 - 6% 4 - 8% 5 - 10% . c - 12% 7 - 14% 8 -*16% 9 - 18% 1 - up to 2% 10 - Over 18% Comments or Explanation .. -2- ,. . ." 4. Does the project remove or rehabilitate oider dilapidated structures kithin the community of a non-historic nature?* 0 - Land Vacant 3 - Rehabilitation 5 - Removal of non-historic dilapidated structure *Structure is defined as any main building on a lot 5. Does the proposed project participate in a capital project listed on the City Council's approved Capital Improvement Program? POINTS 0 - NO 5 - Partially completes a capital project 10 - Completes a capital project Comments or Explanation 6. Will the project require less than 50%of the sewer capability that is available in its land use type? 0 - 50% and over i - ;o - 49.99% 2 - 30 - 39.99% 3 - 20 - 29.99% 4 - 10 .- 19.99% 5 - 5 - 9.99% 6 - 2 - 4.99% 7 - 0 - 1.99% Comments or Explanation ,. c ,. * . .I' L TIE BREAKING RATING POINT SYSTEM In case of a tie in any land use category, the following points may be applied as a tie breaker: 1. Distance to Parks and Recreation POINTS 0 1/2 mile + 1 3/8 to 1/2 mile 2 1/4 to 3/8 mile 3 1/8 to .1/4 mile 4 0 to 1/8 mile 2. Distance to public transportation system POINTS 0 1/2 mile i- 1 3/8 to 1/2 mile 2 1/4 to 3/8 mile 3 1/8 to 1/4 mile 4 0 to 1/8 mile 3. Fire Response Time POINTS No access Over 6 minutes 5 to 6 minutes 4 to 5 minutes 3 to 4 minutes 2 to 3 minutes 1 to 2 minutes 0 to 1 minutes Comments -4-