HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-04-04; City Council; 5402; CETA Assistant City AttorneyN
CITY _OF CARLSBAD
AGENDA BILL NO. ��� Initial:
Dept.Hd.
DATE: April 4, 1978 C. Atty.V M_
DEPARTMENT: Personnel C. Mgr.
-Subject: -
CETA ASSISTANT - CITY ATTORNEY
Statement of the Matter
The City has authorization and funding for nine CETA positions.
There are currently two vacancies for CETA employees. It
would be desirable to fill one vacancy with a professional
level employee, an assistant for. the City Attorney. The
maximum monthly salary for a CETA employee is $833..00. This
amount would not be sufficient to recruit a p-rofessiona:l.
employee.
It is requested that additional funds be provided to the City
Attorney to support a salary of $1,100.00 per month. For
'.,ne last quarter of the present fa.scal year this total would
be $-800.00 fcr salary, plus approximately $500.00 for Office
equipment. Funds could be transferred from the General Fund
to the City Attorney Department Salary Fund.
'i
Exhibit
Resolution No.�3�
Men=andun frccn City Attorney to City Manager dated March 22, 1978.
Recommendation
If. Council concurs, authorize the transfer of funds by adopting
Resolution No.
Council action
4-4-78 Resolution #5367 was adopted, authorizing transfer of funds from
General Fund to the City Attorney's Department Salary Fund.
11
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
March
22, 1978
TO:
City
Manager
FROM:
City
Attorney
SUBJECT:
CETA
VACANCIES
You have asked for my comment on the memorandum to you from
the Personnel Director, dated March 3, 1978, regarding CETA
vacancies. The memorandum indicates that there are two
CETA vacancies in the City at this time. He recommends
that you consider filling one of the position6 with a trainee
or entry level position in the City Attorney's office. I
appreciate the Personnel Director's interest in my office.
I would like to request that you undertake the steps necessary
to fill one of the CETA vacancies with a City Attorney Trainee.
Early in 1977, while preparing my budget for the 1977-78
fiscal year, I gave serious consideration to asking the City
Council to establish a Deputy's position in my office. At
that time there was no doubt in my mind that some assistance
was necessary if we were going to meet all of the demands for
service which we were receiving. Nevertheless, for a number
of reasons, I determined that we could continue to operate
with the addition of help from outside counsel on selected
matters of litigation. It has been obvious to me for some
months that that judgment .aas in error. I simply have not
been able to keep up with all of the demands on my time and
am falling further behind.
As you know, when I came to Carlsbad in 1972 as its first full-
time City Attorney, we had approximately 140 employees and a
population of 15,000. Our population has doubled, the number
of employees has almost doubled and we have added a number of
new departments and functions. There has been an even greater
increase in,.,.vi��.: n, wny of mmmparison Vista has had
... +��+vM�
a full-time CETA.
vDeputy�inrthe-City Attorney's office for the
last three years. I believe our City, which is full service,
has a greater volume of activity. When I was in Escondido in
1971 they were utilizing three full-time attorneys for a
population of 35,000. Oceanside added its third full-time
attorney when they reached approximately 45,000. All three
of those cities also make extensive use of outside counsel.
-•.
9
City Manager -2- March 22, 1978
We've kept some statistical records on the categories of work
performed. Some comparisons may be of interest.
1975 1976 1977
Memorandums of advice 155 255 288
Letters
133
142
173
Correspondence relating to
litigation
-
66
112
Agenda Bills prepared
76
83
96
Agenda Bills approved
252
3C7
392
Resolutions
323
331
377
Agreements
76
96
149
Bonds
66
78
95
Misdemeanor prosecutions
6
9
10
The above statistics are only a general guide but they show a
trend of an increased level of activity in m} office. The first
three months of 1978 indicate a continuing increase at a faster
rate in all categories.
one category of work which deserves special mention is claims
and litigation. The increase in the level of activity in this
area is probably the biggest, single contributor to the increase
in my workload. In 1975 we had sixteen claims, 1976 - seventeen
and 1977 - twenty-three. This year, through March, we have
already had sixteen (even discounting this number for the seven
or eight attributable solely to the unusual rains, the rate
of increase is a cause for concern). Not only has the number
of claims increased but the number resulting in litigation as
well. In 1975 only one of the claims actually resulted in
1A tin=Finn
In 1977 six of the claims were in active litigation. Several
of those under full reservation of rights which requires sub-
stantial amounts of my time.
I
City Manager -3- March 22, 1978
Since the first of the year I have had to give priority to
several important matters; i.e., the AE Realty lawsuit; the
Grove, Priestly, Bristol Cove, Pulido and Dautrich litigation;
the sewer moratorium, with its many attendent subsidiary problems;
and the May Company. I have currently pending in my office a
number of substantial projects most of which are already overdue.
They include:
1. There are twelve bills from 1976 and seven from 1977
which have not been incorporated into our Subdivision
Ordinance. It has been possible to put off the major
revision of our ordinance, which is required, due to the
sewer moratorium, but that should be attended to in the
near future.
2. Extensive revisions are necessary in our parcel map
procedures.
3. We are obligated to adopt a Local Conflict of Interest
Code for all our departments. The Fair Political Practices
Commission has inquired several times when we might expect
to adopt our code.
4. My most pressing project is the need to completely revise
our Environmental Ordinance. Recent litigation has pointed
up the need for some improvements in the ordinance and its
administration. In addition, we have two extensive sets of
guideline revisions which need to be incorporated into our
ordinance and implementing resolutions.
5. We are under a condominium moratorium and the Council has
directed that a condominium ordinance and curb -cut standards
be prepared as soon as possible.
6. Our Zoning -General Plan consistency program is behind. In
particular, I need to spend considerable time with the
Planning Department dealing with the problem of the multiple
zones and the density ranges.
7. We have been involved with Occidental -Ayres in developing
a set of reimbursement agreements and implementing ordinances
to reimbur,a the developers in excess of one million dollars
in ;.swer construction expenses. The Public Works Administrator
City Manager
-4- March 22, 1978 1
has drafts in my office pending review. We also need
to revise the agreement for the Poinsettia overcrossing.
8. The Legislature has adopted a new Municipal Reorganization
Act. That needs to be reviewed, analyzed and compared to
the District Reorganization Act and advice prepared for the
Council Committee and the affected departments in regards
to their ongoing efforts vis-a-vis CMWD.
9. The Council has directed the implementation of a new septic
tank policy which necessitates the adoption of various
portions of the County Code, plus the revisions of a number
of our ordinances. The process has not yet begun.
The above are only some of the projects in my office. In addition,
there are two matters of new legislation which are important. The
first is the new school fee law (SB-201), which I must bring to the
Council's attention in the near future. This will necessitate
adoption of an ordinance, pgotiation with the school districts
in regards to fees, and the development of a new system for meeting
the problems inherent in the City -Developer -School District
equation. The second is AB=884, which imposes a new one-year
scheme for the processing of developments. Implementing this new
law is going to require extensive amendments to our. Planning and
Zoning ordinances and our Planning procedures. Failure to comply
with it will result in the automatic approval of projects. It
affects not only new applications but all those in process. Finally,
as you know; the City has added a zoning enforcement officer. I
appreciate the fact that you have been directing his activities
in other areas for the time being. The simple fact is, that
unless it is a matter of priority to the Council, I simply do
not have the resources available to undertake any additional
misdemeanor prosecutions now, or in the foreseeable future.
In prosecuting cases of that type, we come after the District
Attorney's cases and often must spend a full day, in court just
waiting for a chance to be heard. Those kinds of absences from
the office take such a substantial block of my time that it
simply is not feasible to undertake them..
As indicated above, during the last six months,most of my time
has been devoted to litigation, City Council matters and certain
priority projects. As a result, a number of requests for ,
assistance from departments have simply gone unanswered. There
are a number of things which the departments have been involved
with, such as the Calavera Hills Master Plan -Sewer Proposal,
r�.
City Manager -5- March 22, 1978
Phase II Sewer Allocation System, Agua Hedionda Lagoon Plan
and Encina 5 Coastal Commission approval, where my assistance
should have been available but there was not sufficient time.
Many of our agreements, bonds, resolutions and ordinances are
being prepared directly by the Departments. In addition, I
have received exceptionally fine assistance iiummy secretary
who, in effect, has been working not only as a secretary, but as
a legal assistant as well. For instance, requests for unlawful
detainer actions from the Housing Authority have been handled
exclusively by her, including the drafting and filing of the
complaints.
Personally, I have been working in excess of sixty hours a week
for sometime, which would cause me some concern if it proves
to be a permanent condition. I have also been unable to carry
on the amount of outside reading and seminars necessary to
remain fully professionally competent. These are all stop-
gap measures which will become counterproductive if continued
for any length of time. In my opinion there is an immediate
n::ed for assistance in my office.
I have considered whether or not it would be in the City's
best interests to add a Deputy City Attorney position rather
than the CETA clerk. A Deputy pos-4'tion, filled by someone with
a year's experience, would be able to undertake a greater
portion of the workload and would require less training. We
t could also expect to retain him for a longer period of time.
However, we do have severe space limitations, it would involve
the creation of a permanent position, added costs and it would
take a substantial period of time to get the person on board.
The CETA position would involve more training and we could
i expect when the individual acquired a certain level of experience
they would leave for a better job. However, it could be filled
almost immediately, which is important. It would involve less
cost and a person filling that position would be amenable to
sharing space in the cramped conditions here. Based on inquiries
I have made, the indications ars that we can obtain a qualified
attorney, who has been admitted to the Bar, to fill a Trainee -
Law Clerk CETA position. I think we should try that option.
E:c.^.•:ith�•wi the Avnariance, the person filling the CETA position
would be able immediately to take over the simpler misdemeanor
prosecutions and a number of routine functions, such as reviewing
bonds and approving agreements and, of course, thev could provide
research support on a number of matters.
City Manager
QC
March 22, 1978
My inquiries indicate we would get a good response by advertising
for the CETA position at a range between $900.00 and $1100.00
per month. That would necessitate expenditure of a certain amount
of City funds to supplement the CETA salary. I understand a
similar arrangement has been utilized in the past for administrative
assistants. I would anticipate the necessity to supplement the
City Attorney's budget to cover the added salary and other matters
in an amount of approximately $400.00 per month.
I understand it is preferable to wait until the regular budget
process to request a new position. However, assuming the budget
would be approved in July, and the two or three months to fill
the position, my office will remain without assistance approxi-
mately six months. I don't think the workload will allow that.,
The CETA vacancy eNists now and I would like to request it be
filled as soon as possible.
I would appreciate yc,. undertaking the steps necessary to
place whatever approvals are required before the City Council
for action as soon as possible. Please let me )now if you need
any additional information.
VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR.
City Attorney
VFB/mla
r
3.'
2
3
' 4
5
61
7
n
1f
15
2C
27
2�
21,
24
2°
V
27
2E
25
RESOLUTION NO. 55367
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD,, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE TRANSFER OF $1,300.00 FROM THE GENERAL
FUND TO BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-105 FOR
THE PURPOSE OF HIRING A CITY ATTORNEY
TRAINEE.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to appoint a Comprehensive
Training and Employment Act employee as an assistant to the City
Attorney; and
WHEREAS, such an appointment would require supplemented
funds for Budget Account Numbers 01-105-1110 (Regular Salaries)
'and 01-105-3903 (Equipment);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the City Council hereby authorizes and directs
the City Manager to transfer the sum of $1,306.00 frcm the General
-Fund to Budget Account Number 01-105 for the purpose of hiring a
CETA employee as an assistant to the City Attorney.
3. That Department of Finance Fund Transfer No. 41
Ion file in said department and incorporated by reference herein
is approved.
1
i•
a
n
G N
Z wC
0 U i J
2La
Z
U O
Z f J
4 cz
v
I
1
2
3
4
5
A
I--
PAggp:D, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the C'_ty Council of the
City of Carlsbad, California, at a regular meeting held on the
4th day of April , 1978, by the following vote, to
wit: x
AYES: Councilmen Packard, Skotnicki, Anear and
Councilwoman Casler
NOES: None
.2—
/al
RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor