Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-11-07; City Council; 5452-4; School Fee OrdinanceCITY OF CARLSBAD AGENDA BILL NO. 5452-Supplement 4 ___ Initial: Dept.Hd. DATE: November 1, 1978 DEPARTMENT: City Attorney __ C. Mgr. -R Subject: SB-201 ~ School Fee Ordinance — Establishment of School Fee Schedules Statement of the Matter The City Council at your adjourned regular meeting of October 10, 1978 directed the City Attorney to prepare resolutions determining the fees to be required as a condition of the issuance of building permits for residential developments in the Encinitas, San Dieguito and San Marcos School Districts. The necessary resolutions have been prepared and are attached. They reflect the City Council's determination to concur in the standards for the fees as recommended by the respective governing boards of the three school districts. Exhibits Resolution No.s5"3"(Pfl establishing standards for the amount of fee to be required for residential developments in the Encinitas Union School District. Resolution No.^S&f / establishing standards for the amount of fee to be required for residential developments in the San Dieguito Union High School District. Resolution No . \SZSfA. establishing standards for the amount of fee to be required for residential developments in the San Marcos Unified School District. Recommendation If the City Council concurs in the School Districts' recommendations in regards to the amount of school fees, your action is to adopt Resolution No. ^SfQ > Resolution No. .r^-^/ and Resolution No. - Council action: 11-7-78 Council adopted Resolutions No. 5580, 5581 and 5582 establishing standards for the amount of fee to be required for residential developments in the Encinitas Union School District, the San Dieguito Union High School District and the San Marcos Unified School District. Q «•« • DC 8' 0> .Sil '£>£'0^3 g|8dSi^SZ O M >F e< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 5580 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE AMOUNT OF FEES TO BE REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP- MENTS WITHIN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 4.7, Division 1, Title 7 of the California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has adopted a School Facilities Dedication and Fee Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.55); and WHEREAS, Section 21.55.150 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code provides that the standards for the amount of fees to be required pursuant to such ordinance shall be determined by the City Council and set by resolution. The City Council's determination is to be made after consideration of recommendations from the governing board of the affected school district; and WHEREAS, the City Council is in receipt of recommendations in regards to the amount of fees from the Encinitas Union School District. Their recommendation is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and is made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the City Council fully considered the matter at their adjourned regular meeting of October 10, 1978 at which all persons desiring to speak on the matter were heard, after which the City Council determined to concur in the standards as recommended by the Board of the Encinitas Union School District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A. That the above recitations are true and correct. B. That the standard for the amount of fees to be required 0 003 g _: 0- <N 1 ° < R'ft 3 2 VINCENT F. BIONl.TTORNEY • CITY (1200 ELM AVENRLSBAD, CALIFOR> 3 u 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 as a condition of approval for residential developments within that portion of the City of Carlsbad, which is also within the boundaries of the Encinitas Union School District, shall be as contained in Exhibit A. C. This determination is based upon the City Council's concurrence in the recommendations made by the Governing Board of the Encinitas Union School District, including the .facts support ing such recommendations as contained in Exhibit A. D. Unless the decision-making body especially determines to the contrary, the City Council hereby determines that the following findings and requirements shall apply to any residential develop- ment of fifty units or less: 1. All such developments shall be required to pay fees in accordance with the schedule in Exhibit A. 2. The City Council has reviewed that portion of the General Plan which applies to the Encinitas Union School District and finds that it provides for the location of public schools. 3. That the fees to be paid shall be used for the purpose of providing interim school facilities. 4. That the fees to be paid for each unit bear a reasonable relationship to the burdens placed on the School District by such unit and that the fees will be used to mitigate that burden. 5. That the school facilities to be funded by the fees are consistent with the City's General Plan. E. The standards adopted by this resolution do not at this time require the dedication of land. The Encinitas Union School District is developing standards regarding such dedications. When the District is prepared to make their recommendation in that regard, the City Council intends to amend this resolution to include provisions for requiring the dedication of land as they determine to be in the public interests. 2. Sm 3 S=| o o 8 • ^ -Z"• ' rio Z O co >£ " £ "o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of November , 1978 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmen Skotnicki, Anear, and Councilwoman Casler NOES: Councilman Lewis ABSENT: Councilman Packard ATTEST : "RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor A. v\ <Lu%JT*JL\jart>i_ ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City^lerk (SEAL) ENCINITAS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - ' ' . • - EXHIBIT A TO' ' . . ." RESOLUTION NO. '5580 -O o 5.1 ' Consider recommendation pertaining to developers' fees. '• •• . BACKGROUND; " ' • •. • At the Board Meeting held February 7, 1978 the Superintendent recommended that a Developer Fee Schedule be developed at the rate of $400.00 per bedroom. The Board asked whether the basis for this fee was the cost of portables or the cost of permanent facilities. At the time the recommendation was made it was made on the basis of information given by the high school district and was on a cost of portable classrooms. Since that time, the Superintendent has reviewed SB 201 and is of the opinion that the cost of taking care of mitigating cir- cumstances, caused by overcrowded conditions, can be raised only on a one-time basis. Furthermore, it is determined, using the Flora Vista School as a basis, that the cost of permanent • facilities would be approximately 3 million dollars; that is, $2,250,000 for the school facility and approximately $750,000 . " for the site. • * The school should be built for approximately 600 students or 768 students on the year-round basis. At the rate of 3 million dollars divided by 768 students, we find that the cost per child is $3,904. The generation factor of homes currently in the San Dieguito area is .34 per home. If you multiply the .34 tiroes " »$3,904, you discover that the cost per unit is $1,328. If you divide the $1,328 by 3, which is the average number of bedrooms • " " per house, it comes to $443.00 per bedroom. We consider this to be a fair and reasonable amount to charge per bedroom. The Superintendent realizes that the initial request Was for $400.00 per bedroom and would recommend, that the $400.00 remain. We do have a number of houses that have four and" five bedrooms and this would offset the difference of $43.00 making it a much easier package to recommend* ^ * RECOMMENDATION: . " O The Superintendent recommends the following motion. RESOLUTION; . . Be it resolved by the Board of Trustees of the Encinitas Union School District that the Developers' Fees under Senate Bill 201 for the Enclnitao Union School District be set at the rate of $400.00 per bedroom or like room, or the school district mny accept land for construction of the school facility in lieu of fees providing that the land value is equal to an amount that would be generated at the rate of $400.00 per bedroom or like room. Agenda Item S.I February 21, 1978 COCO "* ° <l&iil£>2 «>5 2^ IL . 1< K> ™°2 W 8 Q S| = gIE 3 > (- a:< < u 2 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 5581 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE AMOUNT OF FEES TO BE REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP- MENTS WITHIN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 4.7, Division 1, Title 7 of the California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has adopted a School Facilities Dedication and Fee Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.55); and WHEREAS, Section 21.55.150 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code provides that the standards for the amount of fees to be required pursuant to such ordinance shall be determined by the City Council and set by resolution. The City Council's determination is to be made after consideration of recommendations.from the governing board of the affected school district; and WHEREAS, the City Council is in receipt of recommendations in regards to the amount of fees from the San Dieguito Union High School District. Their recommendation is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and is made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the City Council fully considered the matter at their adjourned regular meeting of October 10, 1978 at which all persons desiring to speak on the matter were heard, after which the City Council determined to concur in the standards as recommended by the Board of the San Dieguito Union High School District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A. That the above recitations are true and correct. B. That the standard for the amount of fees to be required • o 60 _CO g if 5 M •t < O> 32 si0 ° Z § 1 £ 2 £ * 5 5 i Z ^ 8 Q o t " on > P (C ? "o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 as a condition of approval for residential developments within that portion of the City of Carlsbad, which is also within the boundaries of the San Dieguito Union High School District, shall be as contained in Exhibit A. C. This determination is based upon the City Council's concurrence in the recommendations made by the Governing Board of the San Dieguito Union High School District, including the facts supporting such recommendations as contained in Exhibit A. D. Unless the decision-making body especially determines to the contrary, the City Council hereby determines that the following findings and requirements shall apply to any residential develop- ment of fifty units or less: 1. All such developments shall be required to pay fees in accordance with the schedule in Exhibit A. 2. The City Council has reviewed that portion of the General Plan which applies to the San Dieguito Union High School District and finds that it provides for the location of public schools. 3. That the fees to be paid shall be used for the purpose of providing interim school facilities. 4. That the fees to be paid for each unit bear a reason- able relationship to the burdens placed on the School District by such unit and that the fees will be used to mitigate that burden. 5. That the school facilities to be funded by the fees -are consistent with the City's General Plan. E. The standards adopted by this resolution do not at this time require the dedication of land. The San Dieguito Union High School is developing standards regarding such dedications. When the District is prepared to make their recommendation in that regard, the City Council intends to amend this resolution to include provisions for requiring the dedication of land as they determine to be in the public interests. 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 o 1* 1 1 13 pil 14 ig|| .15 z ^ 8 d 16 If | 17 1 ° 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of November > 1978 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmen Skotnicki, Anear and Councilwoman Casler NOES: Councilman Lewis ABSENT: Councilman Packard s^> * X^X / J^t^^^^^^>^^^\RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor ATTEST : /M*A, ^ T^LTt^L^ ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ , City Cle^JR (SEAL) " 3. EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION- NO. 558"i SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 2151 NEWCASTLE, CARDIFF, CALIFORNIA 92007 714-753-6491 September 29, 1978 Carlsbad City Council Mr. Ronald C. Packard, Mayor 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Mr. Packard: Attached please find a Resolution adopted by the San Dieguito Board of Trustees regarding conditions of overcrowding in school attendance areas in the District. Enrollment in the San Dieguito District has increased over 90% during the past ten years and is expected to continue into the immediate future. The Board has moved to accommodate this growth by a combination of permanent and portable/ temporary facilities that have been provided during that time. Voters approved a bond issue in 1971 that provided a second high school ..in the District as well as significant additions and renovation to the only other high school in the District. Since 1972 the Board has encouraged developer contributions to help offset the cost of providing facilities for students generated from new housinn developments. The District has added forty-four (44) temporary buildings over a. ten year period that have been utilized to supplement the permanent facilities on each of the District's four school sites. The eighteen portable buildings purchased since 1974 are being financed by contributions from developers. In spite of the addition of new permanent and portable facilities, enrollmept growth in the District has continued to outstrip the District's ability to provide adequate facilities. After a thorough evaluation of future facility needs last year, the Board determined in December 1977 that placing additional portable buildings at sites throughout the District would place an undue strain on permanent core facilities. The Trustees modified the developer contribution schedule basing the rate on the estimated cost of providing permanent facilities on existing school sites. Factors taken into consideration when setting the schedule included: 1. The per student costs of constructing junior and senior high schools under a State formula provided by the Office of Local Assistance • 2. The number of students generated from new housing developments within the San Dieguito Union High School District BOARD OF TRUSTEES: William f. Howell President Ann P. SonjIbauQh Vice President ADMINISTRATION)William A. Berrler. Superintendent R. Carry Shirts Clerk Robert A. Morton, Assistant Superintendent Don W. Mitchell Oavld H. Thompson John J. Dally. Dullness Manager Letter to Carlsbad City Council September 29, 1978 - Page 2 3. Capacity at each campus in the San Dieguito Union High School District * Attached is a copy of the Board's Resolution along with Board policy and background information on school construction costs. I will be pleased to provide additional information upon request. Sincerely, William A. Berrier Superintendent bfs cc: Mr. Paul Bus.sey, City Manager Attachments «•, tun KC.: i/ji'iuii luvo ur UVC.KLKUVMUJ.UU - .--.••• . • • IN SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AREAS, , • ' ,' '_;••'••' • « • •* . ' . • • . • * " • * • On motion of Member Thompson , seconded by Member • Shirts i the following resolution is adopted: • WHEREAS, for some time past there has been a continuing and substantial .'increase in population within the boundaries of the San Dieguito Union High 'School District to the extent that the school facilities of this district have •become overcrowded; and . . ' •. " ' * - • * « WHEREAS, a very significant proportion of the increase in population in this district results from construction of residential units in new housing develop- • ments within the district; and : • • • * • • • * . WHEREAS, in the absence of assistance in the form of financial contributions - or dedications of land from the developers of such new residential developments . this'district would not have financial resources adequate to provide proper ed- ' .ucational facilities for all the children residing in this district; and . . •'•-.' • ' '.•'•• . ••'.'•«'* •WHEREAS, Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970; added by Stats. 1977, ' .- Chap. 955), Division 1, Title 7 to the Government Code making provision, for '• financial or other assistance by developers to school districts if the governing board of a school district has made a finding that conditions of overcrowding exist in one or more attendance areas of the district including the specific • data 'specified in Government Code Section 65971; NOW THEREFORE : '• IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED that, pursuant to Government Code Section ' 65971, this governing board makes the following findings: • . •."••."•' '. • • ' ''/• % • • • : • • . . '•.'..";' . (1) Conditions of overcrowding exist in the following attendance area's , of the San Dieguito.Union High School District which will impair •the normal functioning of educational programs in" those areas: . ••'.. • San Dieguito High School - Grades 9-12 . . . '-.; .-.'-. .. •'•' . '.•-.. '• Tprrey Pines High School - Grades 9-12 " . ..-/." • '•' ..•:'. ' •'- ' Oak Crest Junior High School - Grades 7-8 ' . ' • ' ..- * .'.•: ' •"'•' ..:>.' Earl Warren Junior High School - Grades 7-8 ..-.'• ' •:"- "• .. ; ". • •'"' ' • ' ' • ..'-•:..•• ••«.'.'-•'••'•-• '. • . • ' • ' .''•"• -.-•.(2) Reasons for the conditions of overcrowding-in the above-mentioned ";'; attendance areas include the following: . • '. . - . . '" • .' *•. ..•'. *. . •'•• ' • "'•'/.. '"••'. CURRENT ' CURRENT CAPACITY ' ••''••• ' • -ENROLLMENT PERMANENT AND PORTABLE • San Dieguito High School ' ' 1943 • • .'' : 1785 Torrey Pines High School 1955 ' • • 1734 Oak Crest Junior High School .950 : • ' 983 ' . . Earl Warren Junior High School .• • 630 . • 832 In addition to the students presently,enrolled, the -County or the responsible city has approved numerous developments in each of the above named attendance areas that have potential for further impacting District schools. The annual increase 1n student population has averaged approximately 4% per yev. over the past four years and this rate is expected to continue in the immediate future. The students currently enrolled, combined with those anticipated from new developments already approved, has .suited in an overcrov/ded condition at each of the schools listed above.• . (3) All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated and no feasible method for reducing such conditions exists. Mitigation . measures considered by the governing board of this district to reduce the overcrowded . conditions include the following: . a) The District has entered into agreements with developers who have contributed financial assistance toward the cost of providing temporary use buildings. Other temporary buildings have been financed cut of the District's general fund so that each site contains a mix of.temporary and permanent facilities. • b) District voters approved a bond measure that provided the first phase of a new high school in 1974 that is seriously overcrowded in spite of the addition of sixteen (16) portable classrooms at that site since the fall of 1975.* ,- . c) Student busing and boundary realignments are not feasible alternatives'- at the high school level since both of the District's two comprehensive high schools are overcrowded. These alternatives have been considered at the junior high level; however, those campuses are projected to exceed capacity prior to the completion of developments that have already received approval from the appropriate governmental body. ... •• .. : . . • '•'•-..;_ -.. • • d) Such alternatives as year-round operation and double sessions have been examined by committees of parents and staff, but have been rejected due to what is msidered to be a negative impact on the instructional program. . . e) The District has no "surplus" real property or "low priority school facilities", therefore this is not a. feasible alternative for increasing school capacity. • . . -"* • . ... • * f) Following a comprehensive study by a "Facilities Committee", the Board, on June 1, 1978, identified the facilities required to keep pace with District growth. One new junior high school was called for.plus additional permanent facilities on each of the District's four existing campuses. Passage of Proposition 13 has made it impossible to finance new school construction through bond issues that are repaid by a tax on property. • . . Additional temporary buildings on the sites identified above would put a severe strain on existing core facilities, thereby necessitating an expansion of permanent buildings at both the high school and junior high level. Expansion-of permanent facilities appears to be the only logical alternative available to mitigate current conditions of overcrowding. . ' ' . (4) The conditions of overcrowding in this district and the explosive population growth projected for this area can only be accommodated by the construction of new permanent facilities. The use of temporary use buildings/relocatable structures to accommodate future growth in the District has been exhausted. Support by developers in the form of financial contributions or dedications of land is necessary in order to try to keep abreast of population growth and even with such assistance, any sign- '*icant reduction in the conditions of overcrowding will be difficult until sufficient .funds can be generated to p /ide additional permanent claL oom buildings. ^BE IT. FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Secretary of this Board deliver Jrtified copies of this resolution to the city councils and/or the Board of Super- visors of all cities and County within whose boundaries the school district lies '-.together with copies of this District's policy on the subject of developers', - jubdividers1, and builders' contributions to mitigate impact on school facilities •to indicate the type and scale of assistance considered appropriate to meet the needs of this district. . • . • . _ PASSED. AND ADOPTED by the Governing Board of tha San Diecuito Union Hioh School District of San Diego County, California, this 28th day of September1978. . . ..... r!.. oJQ Govarhinq BoardSan^Dieguito Union High ool District,~~ . NEW CONSTRUCTION ' . . . ... -7100 . •'••-..•' 3110^ C Availability of Facilities It is the goal of the San Dieguito Union High School District Board of Trustees to .provide the best possible learning environment for-all of.the students who live within the boundaries of the San Dieguito Union High School District. ' .Hopefully the District patrons and registered voters .will continue to support the • school district through the authorization of bonds for the construction of permanent school facilities, hev/ever rapid growth within the District may require alternative solutions to the school housing problems on an interim basis. During this period, temporary classrooms along wi.th other solutions will be utilized to the maximum extent the District has the financial resources to devote to this end in order to avoid the requirement to operate on double sessions. The Administration and Board ; of Trustees will explore every legally available avenue to secure such funds, and/or financial assistance to provide the space needed to maintain a quality educational program. " • • Because a high quality educational program benefits not only students and the community but also benefits land developers and builders by facilitating the sale of their homes, it shall be the policy of the Board to include property developers and builders within the class of persons from whom financial and ctner contributions . will be vigorously solicited. • . ... •-..'• • . . '•'.' •-,,.. . . ".._'•- ' • '-., '* . • • ' ' t ~ . • ' ."*" ''**.• . " • • ... • " ,• It will be the policy of the Board of Trustees, within the legal limits of its discretion, to extend cooperation'to developers and builders who assist the District in the task of providing interim measures to maintain the high quality of the educational program,and such cooperation shall be in the same measure as the assistance provided by the developer. . . . . ..-,'._., .. - . .-.'•- . The Superintendent is authorized to prepare administrative regulations that will. ;(a) provide guidelines for determining the availability of school facilities to meet .the needs of the projected enrollment and (b) identify the level of developer support required to mitigate conditions of overcrowding in District schools. Among the factors to be considered are: • . .••. • "• . •" "•« • ..'".". *.._•";, f ' 1. The availability of school facilities to accommodate the projected -. enrollment. .'"'".-. . • . . '.,.:. • . • 2. The anticipated impact of proposed development.on school enrollment. .3. The timing and certainty of the developer1^ building plans'. . ' ' • * 4.' The type of school facility needed when conditions of overcrowding exist. 5. The provisions of local building,ordinances with regard to residential development. . • . . Policy Adopted: December 1, 1977 (effective 12/2/77) I/] ' Availability of Facilities . . • . " ' • ' -: " - *, • • * ' •*'."'•* "I. Facility Capacity ' ''• " *• • • . ' . • ••:. • . "• . . • ' ••'•'.'* *. . . *.•..'' The following factors will be considered in determining-the availability of facilities to meet the needs of the projected student population: A.. Projected Enrollment . ' •. / : . : . • •'-• "'•".. .'•" •. .."'•: • The administration will project the enrollment for each campus for the • : .:•".;/-.." following school year fay the beginning of the second semester./":The" -.-./.-.' '_''.'••". projections will take into consideration such factors "as: .....'. • :•'..: '•'':/"* - '•;- ••: 1. 'Enrollment in the feeder elementary districts. '."...- '-;-.r-'-;X •:''••. v-.' .'•-••'. "2. Current enrollment at the secondary level. . • : , './ ..:- :". '"•:••:'••'•'- ••' ' 3. -projected enrollees as as a result of new residential units.planned'. ••-..'.. . for each attendance area. . .- '"• :". - -..- •'.-'•-^ ••• ••'..•-..'. ;-.-.-. iv"". B. Current Capacity ' . :: •'...'•"'. .\; ~*'' ;":"".''/^,( '''"• '"• •-"-.V"Vi-::.. r^"^';"." -"" •''••-""^ "Tji'-'.'v-i .-The capacity of each campLis is determined by the number o^ students v/ho " '•"•'•'..'.' may be served by the existing, facilities.. The following factors will be; .":.;•": \"... taken into consideration in determining the capacity of a given campus: • •• :: ,r. •- 1." Number of teaching stations in permanent facilities.''••"•'•'.":•';*• j '•"• ".v'-'!""^ .. . 2. . Number of teaching stations in temporary facilities. ' .; ••;'•"' :" '.;; ...•:.< • _3. The "staff ing'pattern and level of .educational program offered. ./•"/• ..•.-••"•'.-- at the school site. . - ."• '•:;'•••:•.•• •>:".<'•••'••.'.-'• ?'•'.,.. '.>.•::-;•"»--., ..- • C. Maximum Capacity . • •• :/; - % \;'-:>V .:/> ; .• - ' ':'-•" "' •• -;;V^:" '•''' •'•'.'.', Maximum capacity is deemed to be the greatest number of students v/ho can : - ." * ' be provided a quality educational program and school environment on a "• 'v "" conventional time schedule. The administration will monitor plant capacity. .-^V'. Facilities will be determined to be available at a particular school site if one ; of the following circumstances exist: • ..•".-....- -'*,"•.•... ''•'••;• - '....- -'-.-:' ••' • » A. t Current capacity will accommodate the projected enrollment. ".'.'vr."-" -'"~ i'r- * * "^ ."j: B. Plant capacity is modified to accommodate the projected enrollment by a' '.".'V-;v \ -. procedure acceptable to the Board of Trustees.- . : • , : •• . •';...'•"•• If the projected enrollment for the school is'greater than the current capacity • '..'-"v" ,. but does not exceed the maximum considered acceptable by the Board of Trustees • -,•/-'.. to maintain a proper learning environment, interim steps are possible with • \ ;:'. developer or other assistance to'increase plant capacity. ••'.•'.• •' •:':>.'•. ' ' * ».• • . • .•'.-. ". • ' ' • •'• *'••' • •:'• *• •• •'.••• •.••••...• •• . -._-,.. •• .:• ^ V-/1V^ Administrative Regulation Issued: December!. 1977 (effective 12/2/77) 1/2 • '."•".• •'••': . Revised: . ' • • . ' . ' "• III.1' Cooperation with Governmental Agency Responsible for Residential Development the administration is to evaluate the impact of each proposed subdivision, . • ; rezone, or special use permit, to determine the impact that will occur on the District's ability to provide adequate school services and facilities for area students. . . . ^ " : . . • A. • Sufficient Capacity - If it can be determined that the capacity of . . . the particular school is sufficient to accommodate the projected ; . '.'• . '-• . enrollment, a letter of availability will be provided to the appropriate .,'.. ..••". .':• governmental agency. . .. • '. • •• • . .-.-., ..'"•".. - . ..-..:-.,..••"-••••-•••• %*£.'V,:--''/'B.' Insufficient Capacity - If it is determined that adequate services and ' '?-.'••"'"..'-.•'• .',-"• facilities will not be available to serve the students projected from ' ;' • *-.-••... the proposed subdivision, rezone, or special use permit, the adminis- '- ., ':;. -,.;• tration will so notify the appropriate governmental -agency. < ..••-.-'•• IV. ^Increasing Enrollment Capacity -.>•'• "'; •-•"-• "'"•'•!,• ^ ••.'.--- '"..:'•'. The administration shall explore with developers and others, interim measures • •••'•'•:'•.• to mitigate projected overcrowded conditions in District schools.". Developers . ,.*;';< 'shall be encouraged to assist the school district to accornrnoJate students .-•••/•'.. • •''•. projected from new developments through such efforts as the donation of land ''r • •' -for school sites or through financial contributions for facilities. . " '." .""/'•'*. v':. Plant capacity will be considered adequate when the developer has entered into ." .- '„ . ; a secured agreement with the District to provide assistance acceptable to the " '',:... ••;'. .Board of Trustees. When such conditions exist, the administration shall provide '-'I .-... •' a letter of availability, to the appropriate governmental agency. . .. - .."'..- V~';~ .- "• " • " . - i "..**• '.*•-"'*• * •* •VHV-* . ' . "' -'-.. .*'*-'•••• **• ** • ' . ' •- "V7 Monitoring System for Develooer Contributions . •• . . -.-.''V••;•'•''''' *',•/•'.""..'-."• '\-"'X'?:' ^^^^•^—* MV*^—H^n I IIIH V, II .,_"• I. • I • • I I II II !!• KMHB^^ball I I •• fc !• liaaHHB^ ••^••MIM^VI^HMI I I M '. . ?'••*»*'*•' • *"*'»_*""." * . ••-.. ••••• -."_•..•- ...'*'' ." . ... ' -• ". ..." -*., V». ' * .. * Any monies that accrue to the District as a result of agreements with developers " .- * shall be placed in a special reserve fund for use in mitigating "overcrowded . ' -..;•.-, -.-:/; conditions in District schools. A report shall be filed with the appropriate ";.-:.:.". .- '.' governmental agency that .will account for the funds on an annual basis. .. : .;- .:-.;^i'::, ' •' • •••'.' ''• "•'* '.- • '.''*•'•'• ;' ''•'.•/:'.';. ;' -^: • ".^•"'~-''-';: "-^'f- '.''^'T^'!;- */•:. Administrative Regulation Issued: December 1, 1977 (effective 12/2/77) 2/2 Revised: . .'•••••• • .• • • 7100 •*:.'' r ' 3110 . -.. SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT . .... ... • . • STUDENT HOUSING CAPACITY - FALL 1978 • ,/ • • ' .1. 9-12 High Schools - Regular Schedule The capacity of a senior high school plant is calculated on a space utilization factor of approximately 85% of the teaching stations at 30 students each. The ability to fully utilize available instructional space depends on such factors as properly balanced classes and a class size average close to the maximum. 1. San Dieguito currently has 70 teaching stations including six physical • education classes. . . . 70 x 30 = 2100 x 85% = 1785. • 2. Torrey Pines has 68 teaching stations including six physical education < classes (includes lecture hall and I.A. room) - . 68 x 30 =.2040 x 85% - 1734 . - ' * •'*•'•' II. .7-3 Junior Highs - Regular Schedule . The c&nacity of a junior high plant is normally calculated on a utilization factor of 90% with 28 students'per teaching station. * * •• • ."1. Earl Warren now his 33 teach.ing stations. . ' . ;' - 33 x 28 = 924 x 90% = 832 '-..'. ,'\".'.".'"-.:. . : ; .. •'.•'. • - * • . . t. ...... .. ... • . • • 2. Oak Crest now has 39 teaching stations;,- •-. - ••--.. ". . .: '..-: ./ -•_•'" . •- • •'•'•.' .,39 x 28 = 1092 x 90% = 983 . ' .... .-• :" ill. Exceeding Capacity - It is possible to exceed projected capacity at both the high school or junior high level by such procedures as: . » A. Schedule modification - extending the school day to permit more students to take advantage of specialized facilities such as shops . , and laboratories. . . • '. • B. Facility modification - utilization of space not specifically designed for instructional pruposes, i.e., faculty lounges, storage areas, etc. . • . • . • * *' . * While both procedures have been utilized to increase plant capacity, they do ' not provide an optimum learning environment for students. . . ' ' ...... . • ni mv.nrii_ii i u ' • • ' •• . . 7100 . •- - ' •'••••'.•••' -.-'.. 3110 SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT . • ' ' ••'•.. . • SUGGESTED DEVELOPER FINANCIAL AIDE FORMULA ,' '. . / » • . * - •* " " - J- ESTIMATED COST OF PERMANENT FACILITIES/STATE-WIDE ' - ;.•..•'•"::', --:: The State Department of General Services, Office of Local Assistance, provides • '. a formula for support of school building programs in districts eligible for State assistance. This formula identifies an allowable base cost per square foot for different types of buildings-at the high school and junior high level. . • Although San Dieguito Union High School District is not eligible for this assistance, the formula provides a guide for determining the cost of constructing permanent buildings under the State aid formula.. - • ••/.:- • . " * : 'In a report to the Legislature in 1975-76, the per pupil costs of constructing . "•'.. •..permanent facilities was listed at $4,743 per pupil for high school and $3,390 •for junior high. It is estimated that construction costs have increased .between one and two percent per month during the two year .period since *the . . .report v/as issued. . Therefore, the estimated per pupil cost of providing ' permanent school facilities is: . • . '. . . -..-•;. : , -.*.-.. . ----- '• . 1% oer month increase "• • 2% per month increase ' •••'.' High School 34,738 x 124% = $5,875 High School 54,738 x 148% = $7,012 . . .Junior High 3,390 x 124% = $4,204 - Junior High 3,3CO x 148% = $5,017 II.I-" ESTIMATED COST OF PERMANENT FACILITIES/SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT .;•;,' -' ••.'•-'The most current State aid formula has been applied to the actual buildings in '. • •"•• phase I and to those planned for construction during phase II at Torrey Pines - ".'••.' High School. An estimate has been made for providing a complete facility for .. - :. -approximately 2,000 students-including site work, furnishings, and. fees. Similar : . - .^criteria was developed for 7-8 junior highs developed around the requirements of *."••:'.'. an existing campus in the San Dieguito Union High School District. The cost of ""V-^land is excluded from the cost estimates for providing facilities at both the "State and local level. . • : • • .-. • - .' . . • .. ..."•• * • • .'.* '-• .". . .* "--.'-•*" ' " .:•" -The estimated cost of construction tabulated on a per pupil basis is as follows: : ' .High School - $6,401 * " " : : - : ' '•.''•'[ *.. . - Junior High . 4,544 • . .' . . •• . . ' - •• "• • .• : III, _ESTIMATED STUDENTS PER DWELLING UNIT .' /'"• ' .;.' ;; ; •'...•' • ' . ' . DWELLING TYPE . ' . ;:"•-'.-'•'' ^Grades 7-8 Grades 9-12 Grades 7-12 . • • ' ' • ' • •''-..''• «,:Single or Multi-Family, 3 or more bedrooms • •' • • ' . or equivalent rooms ' , • »12 .25 ' .' .37 Single or Multi-Family Homes, 2 bedrooms • • • ' . .or equivalent rooms • ,05 ..IT . . .16. .•• •. Multi-Family Homes, 1 bedroom or equivalent ••' ' . room . • . ,02 .04 . .06 . L COST PER DWELLING UNIT 7100 3110 fLLING TYPE hgle or Multi-Family, i or more bedrooms or quivalent rooms hgle or Multi-Family Homes, ! bedrooms or equivalent ooms Iti-Family Homes, 1 edroom or equivalent room PUPIL 7-8 GENERATION TOTAL PUPIL TOTAL TOTAL 7-8 9-12 GENERATION 9-12 7-12 $4,544 4,544 4,544 FACTOR :.12 .05 .02 $545 227 .-: 1 $6401 6401i _ • i 6401 . ^ FACTOR ,i .25 •11 .04 $1600 704 256 « $2145 931 347 t 2/2 ' HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL 2000 STUDENTS ENR INDEX 2666.4 15 November 1977 I. BUILDINGS A. B. C. D. E. Academi c 1. Science (i 2. Math 3. English 4. Language 5. Social Studies 6. Business 7. Library 8. Lecture 9. Toi-lets 10. Offices 11. Circulation 12. Subtotal Administration 1 . Compl ete Vocational 1. Metal /Wood/Auto/ Drafting/Other Art/Homemaking 1 . Arts/Crafts 2. Homemaking 3. . Subtotal Physical Education (no .1. Gym/Aux. Gym 2. Shower/Locker 3. Subtotal J 12,500 S.F. 9,000 S.F. 12,600 S.F. 7,200 S.F. 12,300 S.F. . 7,800 S.F. 16,200 S.F. 3,600 S.F. 1,500 S.F. 6,700 S.F. 10,400 S.F. 99,800 S.F. 7,600 S.F. 19,000 S.F. 6,000 S.F. 5,500 S.F. 11,500 S.F. stadium, no pool) 26,800 S.F. 11,500 S.F. 38,300 S.F. $ 64.28* 37.26* 37.26* 37.26* 37.26* 43.11* '43.88* 40.91* 106.72* 46.75* 35.40* 46.75* 40.57* 39.03* 47.41* 38.37* 52.26* $ 803,500. 335,340. 469,476. 268,272. 458,298. 336,258. 710,856. 147,276. 160,080. 313,225, 368,160. $3,576,185. $355*300. $770.830. $234,180. 260.755. $494.935. $1,028,316. 600.990. $1,629.306. *OLA Allowable Base Schedule for San Diego EViVfatfs. .TL^^gj-gJ HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL 2000 STUDENTS ENR INDEX 2666.4 15 November 1977 page two F. Food Services 1. Kitchen/Service 2. Shelter 3. Subtotal G. Misc. 1. Student Center 2. Lockers 3. Storage/Custodian 4. Subtotal H. Performing Arts Center 1. Theater Seating/ 500/Stage/T.V. Production 2. Band/Choral/ Storage/Offices 3. Toilets 4. Subtotal 4,000 S.F. 4,000 S.F. 8,000 S.F. 2,000 S.F. 6,000 S.F. 5,000 S.F. 13,000 S.F. 60.53* 14.11* 40.91* 14.11* 35.40* 242,120. 56,440. $298,560. 81,820. 84,660. 177,000. $343,480. 22,500 S.F. 6,000 S.F. 1,500 S.F. 30.000 S.F. 46.53* 1,046,925. 42.78* 256,680. 106.72* 160,808. 1,463.685. .-. TOTAL BUILDINGS 227.200 S.F.$8,932,281. HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL 2000 STUDENTS ENR INDEX 2666.4 15 November 1977 page three II. SITE III. IV. V. VI. VII. A. Parking/Streets/800 cars B. Concrete Walks/Paving C. Site Utilities D. Grading/Drainage E. Fields 1. PE Fields 12.85 acres 2. Football 110,000 S.F. 3. Track (400 meters) 4. Fencing .5. Misc. 6. Subtotal F. Landscaping G. Misc. H. Total Site » OFF-SITE ' A. Off-Site (Unknown) FEES/TESTING/PERMITS/INSPECTION FURNISHINGS @ 10% building cost LAND - not included TOTAL CAMPUS COST 364,000 S.F. 0 90<£/SF 130,000 S.F. @ 1.45/SF L.S. L.S. e 60$ @ 1.25 L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S.• L.S. 8% - 327,600. 188,500. 135,000. 260,000. 322,779. 140,000. 45,000. 36,000. 40,000. 583,779. 240,000 40,000. 074,879. 320,000. 882,173. 893", 229. $12,802.562. (excluding land) COST/STUDENT $6.401 JR. HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL 1000 STUDENTS ENR INDEX 2666.4 15 November 1977 t&fSSJ*m4uuia£CSai I. BUILDINGS 1. General Classrooms 2. Library/Media Center 3. Homemaking 4. Shops 5. Multi-purpose 6. Kitchen • 7. Shower/Locker 8. Administration/Teacher 9. Storage 10. Toilets 11. Janitor 12. Mech/Equip/Misc. 13. Circulation TOTAL BUILDINGS 26,000 4,600 S.F. S.F. 1,860 S.F. 2,100 S.F. 3,000 S.F. 2,000 S.F. 5,200 S.F. 2,800 S.F. 2,000 S.F. 2,800 S.F. 900 S.F. 2,400 S.F. 18.000 S.F. 73,660 S.F. $ 40.57* 43.88* 47.41* 40.57* 38.37* 60.53* 52.26* 46.75* 35.40* 106.72* 35.40* 35.40* 25.50 1,054,820. 201,848. 88,183. 85,197. 115,110. 121,060. 271,752. 130,900. 70,800. 298,816. 31,860. 84,960. 459,000. $3,014,306. *OLA Allowable Base Schedule for San Diego OR. HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL 1000 STUDENTS ENR INDEX 2666.4 15 November 1977 page two II. SITE 1. Parking/Streets 2. Walks/Pavement 3. Site Utilities 4. Grading & Drainage 5. Fields a. PE Fields .b. • Football c. Fencing/Backstops d. Track e. Misc. 6.. Landscaping 7. Total Site III. Off-site IV. Fees/Testing/Inspection @ V. Furnishings @ 10% building cost VI. " Land, not included VII. Total a. Total cost (not including land) b. Cost per student 30,000 S.F. @ 90<fr 14,500 S.F. 1.45 L.S. L.S. 176,441 (* 60* 80,576 1.25 L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. )St 3 land) 27,000. 21,025. 85,000. 150,000. 105,865. 100,720. 20,000. 35iOOO. 22,000. 175,000. 741,610. • 175,000. 4f 298,000. 315,000. -0- $4,543,916. $ 4,544. • Q CD 3 0 • DC egs- < « s" = 1 VINCENT F. BIONIATTORNEY - CITY (1200 ELM AVENIARLSBAD. CALIFOR5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 5582 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE AMOUNT OF FEES TO BE REQUIRED'AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP- MENTS WITHIN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 4.7, Division 1, Title 7 of the California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has adopted a School Facilities Dedication and Fee Ordinance (Carlsbad Muncipal Code Chapter 21.55); and WHEREAS, Section 21.55.150 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code provides that the standards for the amount of fees to be required pursuant to such ordinance shall be determined by the City Council and set by resolution. The City Council's determination is to be made after consideration of recommendations from the governing board of the affected school district; and WHEREAS, the City Council is in receipt of recommendations in regards to the amount of fees from the San Marcos Unified School District. Their recommendation is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and is made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the City Council fully considered the matter at their adjourned regular meeting of October 10, 1978 at which all persons desiring to speak on the matter were heard, after which the City Council determined to concur in the standards as recommended by the Board of the San Marcos Unified School District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A. That the above recitations are true and correct. B. That the standard for the amount of fees to be required mto ~» o O'u.'o o <i u 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 as a condition of approval for residential developments within that portion of the City of Carlsbad, which is also within the boundaries of the San Marcos Unified School District, shall be . as contained in Exhibit A. C. This determination is based upon the City Council's concurrence in the recommendations made by the Governing Board of the San Marcos Unified School District, including the facts supporting such recommendations as contained in Exhibit A. D. Unless the decision-making body especially determines to the contrary, the City Council hereby determines that the following findings and requirements shall apply to any residential develop- ment of fifty units or less: 1. All such developments shall be required to pay fees in accordance with the schedule in Exhibit A. 2. The City Council has reviewed that portion of the General Plan which applies to the San Marcos Unified School District and finds that it provides for the location of public schools. 3. That the fees to be paid shall be used for the purpose of providing interim school facilities. 4. That the fees to be paid for each unit bear a reason- able relationship to the burdens placed on the School District by such unit and that the fees will be used to mitigate that burden. 5. That the school facilities to be funded by the fees are consistent with the City's General Plan. E. The standards adopted by this resolution do not at this time require the dedication of land. The San Marcos Unified School District is developing standards regarding such dedications. When the District is prepared to make their recommendation in that regard, the City Council intends to amend this resolution to include provisions for requiring the dedication of land as they determine to be in the public interests. 2. mc/i % o: <n r; _ -.u III £ 81 dS o Q ~ 00 o 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of November ,1978 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmen Skotnicki, Anear and Councilwoman Casler NOES: Councilman Lewis ABSENT: Councilman Packard ' RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City CJ^rk (SEAL) 3. EXHIT ? A TO .RESOLUTION NO. 558 ~~ _'san marcos unified school district 270 san marcos boulevard can marcos, California 92C69 ; phone (714) 744-4776 May 1, 1978 70: Mrs". Porter D. Cremans - Clerk of the Board of Supervisors .County of San Diego FROM: James C. Ketcherside • Assistant Superintendent San Marcos Unified School District RATIONALE FOR FEE SCHEDULE FOR INTERIM FACILITIES/S.B. 201 ' It is assumed that in a period.of three years from the issuance of building permits, the district would be able to obtain financing, plan and build permanent facilities to house students generated by a new housing develop- ment. Based upon this assumption, a three year lease of a standard sized classroom with appurtenant costs including installation and return, site preparation, utilities, engineering, walkways, furniture and equipment is used as the basis for the fee schedule. The total cost for a classroom and -.attached costs is $24,310 at the present time.*• . " The'district contract .with the teaching personnel calls for a maximum average class size of 31. This has been the practice in the district for some time. Using 31 students per classroom as a divisor, the cost per student is $784. It is assumed that this fee schedule will be in force for approximately one year. The inflation rate in the construction industry is running 1* per month. Best indications at this point is that this rate will increase in the near future. A modest 10% inflation factor is included. The student generation factors computed by the San Diego Department of Education for the San Marcos Unified School .District are 0.77 students per 'dwelling unit in single family dwellings and 0.24 for attached dwelling units (apartments, condominiums, etc.). Accordingly the cost to house the students generated per dwelling unit becomes $664 for single family units and $207 for attached units. It 1s assumed that the average single family dwelling unit in San Marcos has three bedrooms, so the cost per bedroom becomes $221. ($6G4 per dwelling unit *• 3 bedrooms per dwelling unit). It is assumed that the average attached dwelling unit has two bedrooms, so.the cost per bedroom is $104. The reason for assessing the fee on a per bedroom basis is that the number of bedrooms has some positive relation to the number of children in the family. 4-c: .r—• In some cases it is impossible to determine the number of bedrooms at the time the fee is assessed. This would be true in a lot split or a sub- division of land, other than a housing tract, in a jurisdiction that assesses the fee at the time of tentative or final tract'or parcel map approval even though the fee is not collected until building permits are issued. This would not be a problem in a jurisdiction that assesses the fee at the time building permits are issued. ' . . . . It is assumed that a lot split or land subdivision will result in single family residences as apartment houses or condominiums generally require larger lots. The fee assessed, therefore, for lot splits or land subdivisions where the number of bedrooms is not known is the fee for a single family residence C$664) per lot. . Copy: Carlsbad City Council Escondido City Council San Marcos City Council Vista City Council V «.l I « .. t .,„- m.- ' *.' .san marcos unified school district 270 san marcos boulevard san marcos, California 92069 1 * . phone (714) 744-4776 FEE SCHEDULE FOR INTERIM FACILITIES/S. B. 201 ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES -. . April 4, 1978 3 year lease (low quote - 24'x 38* relocatable) Sales tax 'Installation and return . *... Site preparation, utilities, engineering, walkways Furniture and equipment ." . • 31 students per classroom ** - *. plus 102 inflation Total cost per student $13,500 810 3,500 4,000 2,500 $24,310 per classroom 784 per student • 78 $ 862 FEE SCHEDULE .'-..". ' ' ' '. ' r 1. Single Family Dwelling Units (0.77 student generation factor per D. U. = $664 per D.U.) Each bedroom = $221 to a maximum of $664 per dwelling unit. 2. Attached Dwelling Units (0.24 student generation factor = $207 perD.'U.) Each bedroom =$104 . . .3. Lot splits and land subdivisions where no building permit is involved Per lot * $664 4, Retirement homes, convalescent hospitals, industrial, commercial and • professional t • . = " No fee ' ..."