Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-12-05; City Council; 5668-1; FOUR UNITS, EL CAMINO REAL, SOUTH OF CHESTNUT PUD-11 WILKINSON |APPLICANT|Initial: c CITY OF CARLSBAD 4 AGENDA BILL ~8,5668-Su~plement 1 DATE : December 5, 1978 C. Atty-d DEPARTMENT : Subject: r Dept. Hd. - City Attorney c. Mgr. - FOUR UNITS, EL CAEI‘LJO KEAL, SOUTH OF CHESTNUT PUD-11 IULKIXSON (APPLICANT) Statement of the Matter The City Council at your meeting of November 21, 1978 directed the City Attorney to prepare the necessary documents approving Planned Unit DeveloGment (PUD-11) A resolution in that regard is attached. Exhibit Resolution No. -54 3 3 . Recommendation If the City Council concurs, your action is to adopt Resolution No. ‘yb3.3 . Council action: 12-5-78 Council adopted Resolution 5633, approving a Planned Uni Development permit (PUD-11) for four units on property c approximately 2.22 acres generally located on the west 5 of El Camino Real between Chestnut and Tamarack Avenues. In addition, Council requested an additional report wit1 regards to the frontage road referenced in the project. I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 4m v, E 13 .ii a 55 cn dLwd 14 no3z Z>fK G+<Z 15 mS -I u:, ?a $cg6 16 "u2$ zp y >,- LT 17 a2 c 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UIV 0 e a RESOLUTION NO. 5633 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD , CAL.IFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP,YENT PERMIT (PUD-11) FOR FOUR UNITS ON PROPERTY OF APPROXIMATELY 2.22 ACRES GENEmLLY LOCATED ON TBE WE!sT SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEM CHESTNUT AND TAMARACK AVENUES. APPL1CANT:R. E. WILKINSON. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsk on October 25, 1978 hold a duly noticed public hearing to c the application of R. E. Wilkinson for a Planned Unit Devel Permit for four units on property generally located on the side of El Camino Real between Chestnut and Tamarack Avenue particularly described as: Lot 1 of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbac County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on November 5, 18! and WHEREAS, the Planning Director has determined that sa: change of zone will have a nonsignificant impact on the en' and a Negative Declaration has been prepared and filed in ! faction of the requirements of the City of Carlsbad Enviroi Protection Ordinance of 1972 and the California Environmen Quality Act; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said hearing the Planni Commission of the City of Carlsbad adopted Resolution No. and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1978 the City Council held a hearing on the matter and received all recommendations and all persons interested in or opposed to the approval of P1 Unit Development Permit (PUD-11); - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 12 D a g m 13 E .$ 3' : 0) dLws 14 OO'Z 2 fE Sc $; 15 miS -I u: I 56 wo s$s6 16 $5 : 17 18 19 20 21 22 , 23 . 24 25 26 27 28 gg22 >o k 0 0 0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of City of Carlsbad as follows; A. That the above recitations are true and correct. B. That the findings of the Planning Commission in Resolution No. 1482 constitute the findings of the City Coui in this matter. C. That the Planned Unit Development Permit is grantc for the reasons set out in this resolution and subject to a applicable requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and satisfaction of the following conditions: 1. The approval is granted for the land describe the application and any attachments thereto, and as shown o plot plan submitted, labeled PUD-11, Exhibit "B" and dated October 25, 1978, on file in the Planning Department and in ated by reference herein. Development of the site shall oc substantially as shown on said plot plan. 2. Development shall be in accord-ance with the c and standards set f.orth in Sections 21.45.110 and 21.45.120 Carlsbad Municipal Code and all other pertinent standards o said Code. 3. This project is approved based on the assumpt each lot can be served by a septic system. Sewer service i available for this project. Building permits will not issu the City Engineer certifies that provisions have been made construct the septic system. 4. The following shall be accomplished to the sz a. The access road shall have a minimum widt 24' and shall have a tipped section with P.C.C. curb and 12" P.C.C. gutter along t low side; tion of the City Engineer: . b. Paving of the access road shall meet the street improvements standards; c, Private access road to be located and cer within a 40' easement. The purpose of sz easement to be for a private road, generz utility and access easement. The general utility and access easement shall be dedi to the City. 2. 1' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 Y g 13 -= N E$ o, dLw 14 no'z g&q!k 15 u IS< -J +>wo Egq 0 Z>fg 2~~6 16 17 zg 2 '5 s 0 z - u 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 a d. Half street improvements for El Camino Re( along the property frontage shall be prov Said improvements may include a street li but not median improvements; e. There shall be a smooth 18' transition wi maximum 5% grade, of the private access rl where it intersects the frontage road, wi adequate provisions for drainage; f. The frontage road in the Old El Camino Re right-of-way shall be extended north from exiting paving to a point 37' north of thl center line of the proposed private acces g. The structural section of the road shall 1 determined by the "R" values of the nativc h. All grading will be done in accordance wi. City standards. Newly graded areas shall planted for erosion control as soon as grl is complete; i. Drainage from the site shall be conducted the side via the private access road, in I pipes or air blown mortar swales and dispc in the ABM ditch on the west side of El C, A dry sewer system shall be constructed a the-El Camino Real frontage and in the ut easement to serve all four units. j. k. A 6" looped water main shall be extended El Camino Real to the existing main on Sk: Road. 5. Two fire hydrants as indicated on the site pL shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall. 6. A complete landscape and irrigation plan shal submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of building or grading permits. Said plan will shc areas of native vegetation to be preserved. The design of . landscape and irrigation plan shall incorporate water conse measures. 7. Each lot shall provide two covered parking sp( occupants and one off-street parking space for visitors. 8. Parking will not be allowed on the private ac( road. No parking signs shall be posted. 9. A parcel map shall be recorded prior to issuai Said parcel map to be processed concurrei building permits. this PUD application. 3. -8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 13 E 13 0 a~ <a o) 0 oo=z Z>EE 0.Z.- 15 mG -1 io 3a tuu l6 $&go: 8$22 q : 17 I* 19 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6Lud 14 to k 0 0 0 10. No building shall be occupied until an occupan permit is issued for such building. 11. CC&R's shall be submitted to the City for appr prior to the issuance of building permits. Said CC&R1s shal provide for maintenance of the private access road, the fron road and landscaping. 12. A turn-around area for a fire fighting apparat be provided on the site to the satisfaction of the Fire Marc 13. All four units shall have an address from El C Real and not the private access road. 14. The roofs of all four units shall be construct noncombustible material. 15. For purposes of future additions to the four L a. R-1 setback standards shall apply; b. Front setbacks shall be'taken from the ne? edge of the private access road easement. 16. Any work in the limits of the frontage road st be conducted in such a manner that continued access to the t homes using said road will be assured. 17. The indicated pad elevations of Exhibit "B", c October 25, 1978 shall be complied with within a tolerance c inches and -2 feet. 18. If arrangements can be made with all affected property owners, the access road may be used to provide acct the parcel to the south. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Carlsbad City Council on the 5th day of December by the following vote, to wit: AYES : Councilmen Packard, Skotnicki, Anear, L NOES : None ABSENT : None Councilwoman Casler /&K FL RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor ATTEST: ALETHA 'L. RAU (SEAL) 4. :\ s, @ 0 si. 1200 ELM AVENhE TE (71 CARLSBAD, CALlFORNlp 92008 ,a Citp of CarIs’bab NOTICE OF DETERTINATION LOG NO. A TO: COMY CLERK SECRETARY FOR RESOURCES County of San Diego 220 West Broadway Room 1311 San Diego, CA 92101 Sacramento, CA 95814 1416 Ninth Street PROJECT TITLE: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD-11) PROJE~~DRFSS: West side of El Camino Real between Chestnut and Tamarack Avenues. -- PERMIT AP~LI~: Bob Wilkinson ...-- ENVIROXMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROJECT El’ 0 STATUS OF PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT WILL/MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT APPROVED Er DENIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NONE COMPLETED PURSUANT TO CEQA COMPLETED PURSUA” TO CEQA IJ A copy of the dNegative Declaration fl ETR with supporting documents is available for public review at the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. DATE: 7 - 25 -7 €3 sT-flT+ i’ Planning AMES c. HAMW,,/’ Directo? m 0 INITIAL STUDY S'IUDY DAm: Septemkr 25, 1978 To: James Hagaman, Planning Director FRCM: Eave Abrams, Assistant planner SUBJECT: * PUD-11, WILKINSON, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, Ixx; NO. 506 DrsassroN The proposed project is a Planned Unit Evelopent (PUD) , tentative parcel map ad grading plan for four units on about 2.2 acres of land. property is generally located on the west side of El Camin0 Real htween Chestnut ard Tamarack Avenues. The site is surrourxled by low density sb family developent, similar to the proposed project. Presently, the property is covered with typical gra:;ses, shrubs and other natural vegetation, ad presumably is the habitat for sm small animals and wildlife. Hower, neither the vegetation nor wildlife is considered unique or unusual, and its elimination will not result in the loss of significant species. The grading propsed involves about 3,000 cubic yards of earth mvment. The mrk is intended to create pds for three of the dwellings and to form a private road to service all four hs. No slope will exceed a 2:l rat5 of steepness. required revisions that will insure proper drainage an3 safety. RECQMMENDATION It is recmded a Declaration of Neqative (hbn-significant) Ehvironmenta The The City mgineerm Department has reviewed the plans ard Effect be made regarding this project. JUSTPICATION 1. The project is proposed for an area that is urbanizing with similar ty developent. The site is covered with typical vegetation ad wildlife that is not considered environmentally significant. The City Engineering Department has required modifications to the grad: plan that will insure proper drainage flows and overall safety. 2. 3. DA/ar 9/25/78 e a NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL, IMPACT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Carlsbad has issued Negative Declarations for the following prajects: CASE NO. PUD-11, LOG NO. 506. The proposed project is a Planned Unit Development (PUD) , tentative parcel map and grading plan for four units on about 2.2 acres of land. The property is generally located on the west side of El Camino Real between Chestnut and Tamarack Avenues * * . r. A copy of the subject Negative Declarations with supportive information is available for public review at the Planning Department City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad. invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within five (5) days from the date of this notice. Comments from the public are PUBLISH: Sept. 30, 1978 .. I _____ . - ~ I_c- --- ---I_---- -_.- __ ---- - - . . - . __ " _* _I_ ._/ - - ~"-- -- - ~ -~ ~_.-_ - . .")" *,.. 0 0 T (7 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 aitp of Carlfibwb NEiATJX3 DEQ;ARATION BIWECT TITLE: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD-11) PRQJEcTUXX3!ION: West side of El Camino Real between - Tamarack Avenues. e I?- DESCRIFTION: Planned Unit Development, tenative parcel mi grading plan for four units on about 2.2 acres of land. p- pmmm: BOB WILKINSON m No: 506 PERM1cT/FIIE NO: PUD-11 - .. The City of Wlsbad has conducted an envirommtal revkw sf the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Inp?lemer~btion of the California EnVimmental Quality Act and the ~viro~tal Protection ordir of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a draft Negative Declaration (Declaration of Wn-Significant Dripact) is hereby issued far tk subject prc&?ct, Justification for this action is attached to this doanren ' A copy of the Negative Declaration with sugorthe dmts is on ffie in Planning Departmert, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, CarlSba.d, CA. CmxEnts fr the public are invited. Please submit camens in writing to the Planning Departnwt within five (5) days of date of publication Sept 30 I 1978 mm: g -2- 57-7 €3 P '1L 0 F_ l>! \; I R {I [( 14 El'! T[\ 1.. 5 ij p &c I F: S S 5s 5 14 E N T F (j ii,ikf ----- -~-_ 5-0 -I Rece-ip.i; 40 -; /q,g 9 -/,-/,> EIA NO. -II _-_--__ _-.-_..__ Date: piane of fltpp? ;e%nt: Address: Permi t App? ,i ed For: Case &os, : I Bob Wilkinson --1--_ x--.-l----- _-. __~ -___ 2027 Caminito del Rocio Del. Mar, CA. 92014 if ,! .'' -?=L-"-- ------ .-.-_- -_-____.. - --- - ..___I - -.._I .._.I I_ ____ ..I_I__ __.;____ - 7~~~7~. ;?-I, Tz - , /Ii, , .+ .,? i ,L - :~ PUD - 4 Units -- ,. -.-I_ -._...-I -- -_-_ -.-- ----.--__ -~-1__- _-- --__ ^_...._ ____ I..ocii!tion cf ~rclposc:.! i?c.ii\rity: __.__. ~1 ~ Camino ---..-.-_ Real .-_II__I_-_.. - 500: .--.- .~ --- -__- .--_- South of Chestnut .-... . _..__ .. . -- .--1_ --- _.. -. - I -. .. - . - ___ PI.^____ .. -______l____l__ __----I __ B F; (; KG !? 0 I! i\i g ;( i\! F 0 RI!! )\'j 1 0 i< --I-._- _..-.__ _____ '1 . [I 7 .% 1 'IC2 ., ~. ;?. t\-j e(' d~scrj ..ti a[? of .t,/-ie prg;,~serl 3ct-i -;j ty (c.tt 1 .. 3, Ti y 1) i" e 7 -j i-5 zyi-.y dZ\\!Q-j gp!ncni. pj 217s 1. 4 half acre home sites 2. Dcscri lie thc zicti\;ity area, ii?cludirjg dis.ting~!i~j.!;i?g natural arid man~:,?ide c;i~a.rai~tei--i st?: cs ; a7 SQ provi de pres: slope analysis !:her! iipnr~~rl: r, r;.;;e. The project will occur in a presently developed reside area with proposed homes consistant with the City gene plan and zoning. 3 e Dcscin--i be enr..rgy conse~vation i:ieasii.:.es i ncorpcrc?te:i f nt the des:'gr: aiid,/:~y, operat-i cn of the p!-ojcct, Eome insulation, possible solar heating .’ 0 .e i;lP - 11. Etiv-iroiixntal Impact Amle -I_--.-- II .___- ._-__ I Anwer the Follori tq cjucstions bg placicg a check in the appropriate space * Yes -I 1 L Cou’[d tl:e ~~\-~~~~c~ S-jcJliTff-; ,cantly charge present laiid uses .Eri .l,ha \/*;c.ir.l.i.iy of .1\1:: ac-t;jy.;ty? Could t-he aztl’vity affect the rrse nf a. recreational area 5 or i;rm of i~fipi~t~.!l-L ciesttie-t-ic value? 2. 3. CGUIC~ thc act.ivtty ;iffcct the fuiicti3nirig of a!i esi-abI is tied co IU :I -i ,t~! 01’ ne -i g li11c;;- i:(;ad ’? Could ’ill2 a.ct.il.:ity result in the tiisplaceii~eni; of 4 D con!iiil.!nf tj! 1-es-i di.i-i-ts? .. 5, Are aiiy of the nat:iral or i~-;an-r;:ade fiiaitures i II the activity __ area uniqae, that is, not ~GLJI,,~ i11 othEi* parts of the County, Sbte y or nat-ion? .- 6, Could <,]ic ;l.(:-Lf\,!j.tg s{g~~<fjc~l~-;iy ~.?-FCC~ h }iiL;t~~-ical or --- ~.i-c]-lac.”lozjcai 5i’i.e 01- i.ks s+:-t+:j;:g? 7- CoLi’]6 .tt?-. ?-.-.’-e .. .. c o.~ L;\!.i*ky s~~:?j-~jc~.l?tl~~ a.;‘-fpc.t t!?~ 12:jle;--ti;j.l use, exiraction, or conse;-vi-tion of 3. sccrce i?titvral res- --- 0 u r c e‘? 8. Does the activity ai-ea serve as 2. habiicit, food scxi-ce nesti rig pl zcc, source CY? ~ater 5 etc. fur . r2.m or cnciaiicjcred wild1 ife 01; Fish spzc-ies? Could the o7ctiv-ity significantly a-Ff:xt f3s.I-1~ wild1 -i-Fe or plant ‘1 -ife? Are .’-$ i.l?ere ai-iy rare or ei:dai?g~:rcd pfa.nt species in the a c t i v i ty il re A ? the c.i-i;y‘s lagoons> bays, or tidelands? Cculd the activity change existing featurcs 0-i-‘ any of the City‘s beaches? Could the activity resuit in the erosion or elini.ination of .agr.icultura’l 1 a.ntis? Could the activity sc’rvp to encoui-ngc dcvclopnictit of .presci-~ tly untlcvcf opcid ~TC:~?S or .i titensi-fy cfcvul fipnieiit of a1 rcndy c-lcvcl oped ;~~*cas? 9. IO. 17. COuld the activ’i-ty change ex.ist-ing features of anj!.of 12. 13. .\ 14. -- w .. 1 15.- Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc)? 16. Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any local, State or Federal environmental control agency? Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional 17. use permit by the City? potentially hazardous materials? - - 18. Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of 19, Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood -20. plain? Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? -- 21. Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the - area of an active fault? 22. Could the activity result in the generation of significant - mounts of noise? Could the activ-ity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or 1 other materials? Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? 23. - 24. - 25. . (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore). Will there be : significant change to existing land form? (a) indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards.*O 2-3 (b) percentage of alteration to the present land forin. .__ 26. - X s 08 (c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes. 19 ' Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilit .27. sewers, drains or streets? - 111. State of No Significant Environmental Effects If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I1 but think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate reasons below: . The grading of the road & house pads will cover most of tht but with slope planting, erosion control and landscaping t should be no significant adverse environmental effects. - . .- -0 * IV; Co!liaic?nts 01“ E1abori::i;ions t.0 fin!! of the QuestjGnc 711 Spc.tiot1 I]. (If Z.dd.itjona1 S[lZ..CC iS needed for ans\.;er-ing any questiolls ~ al;t;tc]l acldit.i( --I__-..-- -.---.---L.,! -~- .._-.-- __-- -..-. __ _______ shli~ts i;z niay be rjl&c(j,) S -i g iii; t M IT __-. c.2 . - &’-;4md) -- - -.-- ___ ---.- __ -_ -__- .-----...- ( I)et*soti coi;ip? et-i WJ rcportJ , ---I--- Da.f-e Sjgl-ipd: 7-25- 78 --I__ COt7ClESi9ijS -___.___ (TCf be CGiilple.be~i b;! the Plaij!i.i!?g I)jrec:.iG)-) L Place 2 ctleck in t!ie ij.ppro;?ifiiate bo:; , ( ) j--UU..Lj)Ci.. jIlf(jy ..t.iol.; is y.cqJ.i)-zd. ( ) It I13.s i,cc11 tici;c~mjii~d ~IIS~ t/?e p;,’~,j~c-k \:j.i-/.l i?o.i; l*ja\/e s<cj1jj.riC?.Il-b . ( ) You -jIjjj)ac<; sta-i:t.l;!el1<; b~t ./Jle 7701 7 c;v:-i ;-;g cicte shou’lci ma!:. GI) c fuI”LiiCtq proccssjrig of’ j’c~i!, ]lj*Gj:ct> jl-1 i:ccorcj;:,l;.rt. p/-i-i;h Chap.+)- 19.04. of the i4ul?-ic;jpa.I Cctcip. en\r.ii-otii!:en-~(;7 e.r.fects, ( ) YOU. j:j~!:,t siib!11.it a pi-el jrlIji3av.y ~~1\~-i\-~~i3i~1pl~ -_-..---___-~__ - :z,ljt;1 .iJ;? ?.j;,j;3j!.ig [j-iycc.~oy j-3 discuss g_222& U$,’[E pTEj-\![l-: .. ‘L j .. ccv.i sed 7./3/’/4 ’ F 0 R I.4 P 1.. A P1 1‘1 1 IS G 4 f) uterioffice Correspondenc u /r 2: rr' _I_ - TC): C/T\J &E&--. FP,OM: - E/CIl&E€RlAI h 14ESSAC;E: QL&hSG PRoc€CS -THE A774CHEg -BoNl> 0wflgL : LEWE L COK_P. QdjR?DSE : @-Avr&3 QE12-fil(T LOCA~~O,~ 1 WST Sfac EL C/rf.y(ub PF/~L. /goo sou? ( Cift5 -. -. f?E/YSQ/V-' 7CCWV' fif?NNV Pfi/rA(jf -pdE -no E57(GJ4J OF q7-G- - .... :- OF - - :: *_ \ G&- l2-- _- Attachments: >( Reply requested: -Signature : _i_ REPLY: P Date: Signature: c 0 CITY CF CA>,LS2AT) ./ b Inter-Office Corrzspondence ---I--- OFF ICE : .---- -- - -- i ?@: -.- c{Ty - CLEFzy;- .- 1“” DJ(W Est nlG su3;~c.‘.i I c u$@ {jJ-?ro/b’ @fg _- @ u@e- zr fUM--iiq&$ L‘cjql ’&/ca@uF /ce/I~f DATE: 93T I5 .- { -_-.- . _--.-. - . i ---I r: r,ux : c/ .-L-.. - CY (={4 i 7f.f FC/L p(+f-L~D?/*&s I FClb‘Q I pc,E/+sF wcsc E55 --m-E /4-TTMfED -p @C L?wpu A& [/L’FZ:{Yt ClT luH=d 74qY A&- #pp&q/& E,y ‘/“riG CfTy &TGF-flEy r 19 LLf/bE&- -. Lc/u’QeL cc2gp \xgX?sG- : (0 j. (~/,J..#-T<C~/ 2 - ---i--.-, t - __-- --- _I- . - - - - . _--_c_- -- . - .___ __--- --- --------- I:.m.SSAGZ : J o(=- p)FL(C f f-4 t>&LGi cj gp*f6 yL;‘c’ pJ t.‘) { z f G’J /-I (Nc’k---m/ --- IlY ---- W,& ( p-,f 5 :ss- ‘ ) ,ypLJ la e- [ I i - $ECL’fZ 77 FCv2- p&&4+47JCc /zu+s..J *; y{Dg El- c?dz-?ttffe’cj LE& t &y~~C/;/ ; LJm-57 p>-C7.0/ sw--- OF C~6:HL.r- /+I6 - --_---- - g;L,i. Att;;cknents :- )c p.ep~y rsgcestec?: - k SiGnature: - - - - .-c .- - REPLY: ‘\ \ ‘\ f ytc: Signature: -- a