Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-01-23; City Council; Off Agenda; 1978-83 CIP project prioritization** • ' ^ *?• '• ' v O • • "i • • ^m CITY OF CARLSBAD AGENDA BILL NO. Initial: Dept.Hd. DATE: JANUARY 16, 1979 .•—r———' C. Atty. DEPARTMENT; CITY MANAGER ' C. Mgr. Subject:'~~"' 1978-83 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - PROJECT PRIORITIZATION Statement of the Matter . , ,1 - ——™ " »• - * In previous discussions concerning the Capital Improvement Program, several members of the City Council indicated an interest in having an opportunity to prioritize the projects under consideration prior to staff preparation of the CIP Budget document. In response to . this desire for front end input, the City Manager has instructed Staff to prepare the attached project lists for Council consideration. These lists include all projects that were included in the 1978-83 CIP less those projects included in the 1978-79 Budget. EXHIBITS - .-•'••• Paired Weighting Exercise Description of Capital Projects RECOMMENDATIONS , . - If Council desires to prepare a priority list, each member s.hould complete the paired weighting exercises and return them to the City Manager as soon as possible. DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1978 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: Assistant to the Finance Director SUBJECT: THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE INTRODUCTION In previous discussions concerning the Capital Improvement Program, several members of the City Council indicated an interest in having an opportunity to prioritize the projects under consideration prior to staff preparation of the CIP Budget document. In response to this desire for front end input, the City Manager has instructed Staff to prepare the attached project lists for Council consideration. These lists include all projects that were included in the 1978-83 CIP less those projects included in the 1978-79 Budget. The process of prioritizing ninety (90) capital improvement projects is a relatively large task for a five member body to undertake unless some objective measure of project priority can be established. "Paired Weighting" is a process that provides the necessary objectivity. Through this technique, each Council Member would prepare a priority list for all CIP projects. The results of each member's work would then be combined to give a group ranking that should very closely resemble the majority opinion. The attached tables and project lists may be used for this type of exercise if the City Council would like to proceed. The following section gives a more detailed description of the process. PAIRED WEIGHTING The paired weighting process is a technique that can be applied to any list of items an individual or group wishes to rank. The process itself includes comparing two items at a time, deciding which is the most important, and circling that item. This process is repeated until all projects have been compared to all other projects. The following example may make the process more clear. Using a hypothetical list of five projects, a group of five individuals is to decide the relative priority of these projects. THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE December 22, 1978 Page 2 FIGURE A PROJECT PAIRED WEIGHTING TABLE SCORE 1 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2 ? 4 5 #1 —— 2 TRAFFIC SIGNALS . /4\ A q #2 v^r 3 GOVERNMENTAL BUILDINGS j 1 - #3 4 STORM DRAINS 1 #4 5 PARK IMPROVEMENTS #5 In each pair, the project number with the highest relative importance to the individual doing the ranking should be circled. The first entry in the table, in Figure A, (1/2) compares Project #1 - Street Improve- ments, with Project #2 - Traffic Signals. If the individual feels that street improvements are more important than traffic signals, #1 should be circled. • The second pair of numbers, (1/3) compares #1 - Street Improvements, with #3 - Governmental Buildings. In this example, the individual has chosen street improvements as being more important than governmental buildings by circling #1. This process is continued for each pair of numbers on the table. In completing the exercise, a few rules should be followed: A) A choice must be made. One project number must be circled in each pair. B) Use your first impression. Do not spend a great deal of time on each choice. C) Confine your decision of relative value to the two projects under consideration. To illustrate the scoring technique, assume the above example has been completed by five individuals. Each table would be scored by counting the number of times a particular number has been circled. In Figure B, the Number 1 has been circled four times, the Number 2 has been circled twice, etc. The total scores for each project are shown at the right of the table. THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE December 22, 1978 Page 3 FIGURE B PROJECT 1 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3 GOVERNMENTAL BUILDINGS 4 STORM DRAINS 5 PARK IMPROVEMENTS PAIRED WEIGHTING TABLE Q 4 5 4" 5" SCORE #1 #5 The project scores for each individual are then combined, as shown in Figure C, giving a total group score for each project. The final rank appears at the right of Figure C. The final rank should be reviewed by the group and adjustments made to any ranking that does not meet with the approval of the majority. FIGURE C PROJECT 1 2 3 4 5 INDIVIDUAL SCORES A 4 2 3 1 0 B 1 3 3 1 2 C 4 1 1 3 1 D 2 3 2 2 1 E 4 1 2 1 2 TOTAL 10 10 10 10 10 TOTAL SCORE 15 10 11 8 _6 50 FINAL RANK 1 3 2 4 5 The Council should note that the cost figures supplied on the attached Project Tables are frpm 12 to 15 months old. No adjustments have been made for inflation or other factors effecting costs. These figures are supplied as an indicator of the size of the projects with relation to each other. They should be used only as a guide, not as a current cost estimate. As the CIP document is prepared for Council review, these figures will be updated to reflect any factors that have effected the cost of these projects. THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE December 22, 1978 Page 4 THE CIP PROCESS After the preliminary prioritization, there will be several opportunities for the Council to review the CIP projects before the final CIP Budget is prepared. The following is a brief description of the proposed process which should lead to the presentation of a five year Capital Improvement Program by the end of March, 1979. 1) Council completes paired weighting exercise to establish a priority listing. (Early January) 2) Staff begins preparation of revenue and expenditure, estimates for five year period. (Early January) 3) Staff presents results of paired weighting exercise for Council review with recommendations for amendments, if necessary. (Mid-January) 4) Staff will merge the Council priority lists with funds available to prepare preliminary CIP document. (Mid-February) 5) Staff will present preliminary funded CIP to Council for review. (Early March) 6) Staff will make. Council recommended changes in preliminary CIP and present final CIP for adoption. (Late March) During the process, the Council will have the opportunity to amend the CIP information at several points. The Council should take advantage of these sessions to make whatever changes are necessary to bring the CIP projects in line with Council policy. The staff will incorporate any changes made by the Council prior to the presentation of information at the next session. Some consideration should be given to both fiscal and staff time limitations when amending the CIP projects. THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE December 22, 1978 Page 5 RECOMMENDATIONS The Proposition 13 Citizens Advisory Committee completed a paired weighting exercise to prioritize the CIP projects under considera- tion for the 1978-79 Budget. This was very successful as a tool for creating consensus on the difficult problem of relative project priorities. A tremendous amount of time was saved through the use of a forty-five minute exercise. The Staff recommends that the Council consider this type of ranking exercise as part of the project prioritization process. The process will require about one hour of concentration from each Council Member. The results would be tabulated and made available as soon as all members have completed the exercise. The Council could then consider any adjustments to the resulting rank order at the next Council meeting. JAMES F. ELLIOTT Assistant to the Finance Director JFErvm Att. GITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND GENERAL FUND AND FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING /1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 CITY SERVICE CENTER CITY HALL EXPANSION RESERVE DATA PROCESSING CENTER POLICE FACILITY FIRE STATION #4 (1-5 AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD) FIRE STATION tt5 - TRAINING FACILITY CEL CAMINO REAL & PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD) •*••• FIRE APPARATUS (1979-80 - REPLACE 1963 PUMPER) ^•- AERIAL PLATFORM FIRE APPARATUS (1982-83 - REPLACE 1963 PUMPER) LARWIN PARK (1) ,(1) .(1) ALTAMIRA PARK TRAIL SYSTEM HOSP GROVE PARK' LA COSTA CANYON PARK ALGA HILLS PARK EL CAMINO GLENS PARK CARILLO RANCH CALAVERA COMMUNITY PARK' HUB PARK CANNON PARK SHELTER HOUSE CANNON PARK COMFORT STATION .(1) SAN MARCOS CREEK PARK (1) STAGE COACH PARK(1) TOTAL" PROJECT COST i 1,600,000; | 450,000! I 16 0, 0 0 0 : i 2,470,000; ! 405,000 ti 700,000 110,000 [ 200,000;i 125,000 372,000^ t 215,600 313,200 136,6.00 i 187,000^i 137,500. 237,500'iI 470,000! 1 396,000* i 1,507,000' 6,050; 33,000 216,700 286,000; CITY OF CARL5DAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND GENERAL REVENUE AND FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING PAGE 2 24 CALAVERA HILLS NORTH PARK 25 FUERTE PARK 26 SAN MARCOS CANYON PARK 27 EL CAMINO REAL MEDIANS 28 HOOVER STREET LAND ACQUISITION 29 CALAVERA HILLS SOUTH PARK 30 CHILDREN'S LIBRARY^1) 31 LAND FOR BRANCH LIBRARY MONROE - ELM AVENUE TO MARRON TAMARACK - SUNNYHILL TO SKYLINE^1) 32 33 34 35 36 ELM AVENUE - DONNA DRIVE TO EL CAMINO DUCK FEEDING AREA - BUENA VISTA LAGOON CIVIC CENTER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 37 PARK DRIVE AT MARINA - WIDEN AND RE-ALIGNCl) 38 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CARLSBAD BLVD. AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROADU; 39 SIGNAL - 1-5 AND TRAMARACK - WEST RAMP^1-* 40 CHERRY AVENUE STORM DRAIN 41 STATE STREET STORM DRAIN 42 STORM DRAIN - ELM AVENUE, JEFFERSON TO STATE - 43 AGUA HEDIENDA LAGOON MAINTENANCE PROGRAM^ TOTAL GENERAL FUND S FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING TOTAL" PROJECT-COST 258,500 161,700 22,000 9,000 345,000 220,000 724,100 100,000 394,000 130,000 885,000 17,500 44,000 34,000 ' 500,000 80,000 45,000 375,000 147,000 760,000 15,985.950 CO THESE PROJECTS ARE.FUNDED BY A COMBINATION OF SOURCES. A PRIMARY PORTION OF FUNDING IS SUPPLIED BY EITHER THE GENERAL OR FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND. XTHESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 CIP AND HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY INFLATION. PAIRED -WEIGHTING EXERCISE GENERAL FUND AND 1111111111111111 2 3- 4 5 6 7 -8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 222222222222222 3 4 5 6 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 33333333333333 4 5 6 7' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 . 17 . S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 555555555555 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 ' 6 6 6-6 666 6 6 6 6 '1 8 S 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 7777777777 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 888838888. .- ' '.9 10 11 12 13 '14. 15 16 17 9.99999991 10 11 12 15 14 IS 16 17 10 10' 10 10 10 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 11 11 11 11 11 . . . . 12 13 14 IS 16 17 i * i ' . 12 12 12 12 12 \ 13 14 15 16 17 : ' 13 13 13 13 14 IS 15 17 . 14 14 14 - 15 16'. 17 15 15 . 15 17 \ , . 17 * „• \ . i . ... 18 2 18 3 18 18 5 18 6 18 18 8 IS 9 IS 10 IS 11 IS 12 IS 13 IS 14 IS 15 13 16 IS 17. 18 • iy 2 iy 3 19 19 5 19 6 19 19 8iy 9 10iy 11 iy 12iy 13 14 iy is iy 16 19 17iy is 20 2 3 20 20 S 20 6 20 20 8 20 9 20 10 20 11 20 12 20 13 20 14 20 15 20 16 20 17 20 13 2U 19 20 - 21 2 21 3 il 21 5 21 6 21 21 8 21 9 2.1 .10 21 11 21 '12 21 13 21 14 15 21 16 21 17 21 18 21 19 21 20 ~2T • 22 2 22 3 22 22 5 22 6 22 7 22 8 2'2 9 22 10 22 11 22 12 22 13 22 14 tl 15 22 16 22 17 22 IS 22 19 22 -~JL '/I 22 25 2 23 3 23 23 S 23 6 23 23 8 25 9 25 10 23 11 12 23 13 25 14 23 IS 16 25 17 25 18 23 19 25 2j)_ ?.i 23 22' 23 FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING 24 2 24 3 24 24 5 24 6 24 24 8 24 gr 24 10 24 11 24 12 24 13 24 14 24 IS 24 16 24 17 24 IS 24 19 24 20 •24 :.i 24 22 24 23 W 2s 2 , 2s 3 25 25 5 25 6 2b 8 25 9 2b 10 2s 11 23 12 13 14 2s 15 16 25 17 25 18 19 2i 20— 2T '1.1 25 22' 25 23 .23 24 25 lllll'lllllllllllll 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 55 34 35 56 37 53 59 40 41 42 45 222222222222222222 26 27 28 29 30 51 32 33 34 35 36 37 33 39 40 41 42 43 3 3 3'3 3 V3 33 333 33 33333 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 55 36 37 33 39 40 41 42 45 26 27 28 29 . 30. 31 52 33 .34 35 56 37 53 33 40 41 42 _ 45 SS55S5 5. 55 -555555555 26 27 23 ' 29 30 31 32 • 33 34 35 56 37 53 59 40 41 42 43 666666666666666666 26 27 23 29 30, 31 32 33 34 35 35 57 33 39 40 41 42 45 7777'7 '777777-7777777 26 27 28 29 30 31 52 35 34 55 36 57 58 53 40 41 42 45 S88888888SS38S38SS • 26 27 28. 29 30 31 32 33 54 55 36 37 33 53 40 41. 42 45 999999999999999999 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 . 56 37 53 39 40 41 42 43 10 10 . 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1C 10 10 10 ID 26 27 28 29 50 51 32 33 34 55 36 57 3s 59 40 41 42 43 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 35 57 58 33 40 41 42 45 ' 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 54 55 55 37 53 59 40 41 42 43 • 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 26 27 2.3 29 30 31 32 35 34 35 35 57 33 59 40 41 42 45 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 26 27 23 29 30 31 52 55 54 35 Jo 37 os ja 4U 41 42 4^ 15 15 15 15 IS IS IS' 15 15 15 15 IS 15 15 IS 15 IS 13 26 27 28 29 50 51 32 35 54 35 56 57 3i 39 40 41 42 45 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 16 16 16 16 15 15 26 27' 28 29 30 31 32 35 54 55 36 37 33 39 40 41 42 4j 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 26 27 23 29 30 31 32 33 34 55 56 57 3S 35 40 41 42. 45 IS 18 38 IS 'IS IS IS 18 IS IS IS IS IS 13 ^S 13 IS :S 26 27 .28 29 30 31 32 33 34 55 36 57 33 5i 40 41 42 45 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 13 39 ID 19 19 19 -19 13 IS 1? 26' 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 54 35 56 57 is 33 40 41 42 45 20 20 20 20 '20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 7.S 20 26 27 2.fc 29 " • ~.»<T 5i "32 -33 ' "34"" 5S So S) •&- & 4u 41~ 42 " i'j" n 21 '21-21 2-1 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 .21 .*!-.. il 21 26" 27 2$ 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 33 S3 40 -1- 42 4j . 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 26 27 28 29 30 51 32 53 34 55 -56 57 58 39 40 41 42 4j 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 2j 26 27 23 29 30 31 52 33 54 35 36 57 53. 53 40 41 42 43 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2i 26 27 28 29 30 51 52 55 34 35 36 37 53 59 40 41 42 4o 2S 25-25 25.25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 53 34 55 36 37 53 59 40 41 42 4j 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 25 26 26 25 25 26 26 27 28 29 50 51 32 35 54 35 56 57 53 59 40 41 42 4j 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 28 29 50 31 52 55 54 55 56 57 33 33 40 41 42 45 28 28 28 28 28 23 28 -23 28 23 23 2S 23 2S 23 29 50 31 32 33 34 55 36 57 53 53 40 41 42 45 - 29 29 29 29 29 29 2-9 29 29 29 29 29 29 2? 30 51 52 55 54 55 56 37 53 53 40 41 42 45 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 "31" J2 ii J4 os JO o/ jS 59 40 41 4^ 45 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 32 35 54 55 3o 57 58 59 40 41 42 45 32 52 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 33 34 55 36 57 . 58 53 ~0 42 42 45 33 33 33 33 35 33 33 33 33 35 34 35 36 o7 53 o9 40 41 42 4.; 34 34 34 34 34 34 54 ' 34 34 35 56 57 53 59 40 41 4' 45 35 35 35 ^5 j5 35 35 55 56 57 jS 59 40 41 42 "45 ' 35 36 35 36 35 36 55 4>7 ^3 ;9 40 41 42 45 » . -7 .>7 o7 37 37 37 • 38 33 40 41 42 45 •33 33 33 33 33 39 40 41 42 45 39 39 39 32 40 41 42 43 .''•'. 40 40 43 41 42 45 41 41 42 45. . - « 42 - ' • 1 2 3 4 5 :' 6 -, 3 3 13 n 12 .- ,; 15 17 • •>? ,^ 20 31 1 t ' 22 * ' -- „ . 25 26 27 23 29 50 31 32 3.5. _ f J3 35 37 33 _^ 40 41 ,, , .. CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND CIP PAGE NO. 1 SAN MARCOS/CARLSABD SEWAGE TRANSMISSION LINE 2 ENCINA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL - PHASE II 3 VISTA/CARLSBAD SEWAGE TRANSMISSION LINE - ' CREEK SECTION 4 VISTA/CARLSBAD SEWAGE TRANSMISSION LINE - DOWNTOWN SECTION 5 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT - HOMEPLANT SITE - WET WELL 6 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT - FOREST LIFT STATION 7 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT - JAMES DRIVE LIFT STATION 8 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT - CARLSBAD BLVD & CHINQUAPIN LIFT STATION 9 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT - HOMEPLANT - PUMPHOUSE TOTAL SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND CD A MAJOR PORTION OF THE FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUPPLIED BY A CONSTRUCTION BOND ISSUE. TOTAL PROJECT COST 770,000 2,000,000 100,000 140,000 59,700 50,900 23,600 45,000 56,000 3>245,200 XTHESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 CIP AND HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY INFLATION. G PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERClO SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 34 5 67 89 22222 2 2 3 4 567 8 9 3 33 3 3 3 4 5 67 8 9 44444 5 67 8 9 5555 6789 6 6 6 ...':. 78 9 / 7 7 8 9 8 ' 9 ,; i v • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 . 8 9 ZIP "AGE O O ' CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND ' NON-CITY SOURCES • TOTALX W>.__ . PROJECT COST ; H6 H7 J2 F9 Fll F13 F15 G4 G7 G8 G10 Gil G12 G13 Jll J12 J17 J18 J24 . • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16-' 17 18 19 CO C2) C3) 5CTHESE (IVAVENIDA ENCINAS STORM DRAIN PARK DRIVE STORM DRAIN WATERLINE - INDUSTRIAL PARK, AVENIDA ENCINAS SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD^1-* EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING AT HIGHWAY 78^3-> : STREET LIGHTING - LA COSTA AVENUE^2^ VARIOUS BIKE ROUTES(3) WASHINGTON STREET - ELM TO CHESTNUT(3) SIGNAL - ALGA ROAD AND EL CAMINO REAL^1^ SIGNAL - ELM AVENUE AND 1-5^' SIGNAL-- ELM AVENUE AND MONROE STREET^ SIGNAL - EL CAMINO REAL AND TAMARACK ^^ SIGNAL - EL CAMINO REAL AND ELM AVENUE^2) SIGNAL - LA COSTA AVENUE AND RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD(1) SIGNAL - MARRON ROAD AND MONROE STREET^ 1^ WATER IMPROVEMENTS - AVENIDA ENCINAS, CANNON ROAD TO BURROUGHS PLANED WATER IMPROVEMENTS - PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, PASEO DEL NORTE TO THE EAST 1750 FEET. CO WATER IMPROVEMENTS - ELM AVENUE, DONNA DRIVE TO EL CAMINO REALCO WATER IMPROVEMENTS - JANIS WAY, ELLERY SITE TO EL CAMINO REAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS - WALNUT AVENUE, MADISON STREET TO TYLER STREET. TOTAL NON-CITY SOURCES DEVELOPERS/PROPERTY OWNERS ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS OTHER SOURCES FIGURES ARE BASED ON 'ESTIMATES PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 C HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY INFLATI 400,000 215,000 80,000 1,600,000 25,000 74,000 505,000 60,000 80,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 . 55,000 66,700 - 41,000 52,000 33,400 18,200 3,525,300 IP AND ON. o PAIRED WEIGHTING NON-CITY iiiiiiiiii 23456789 10 11 222222222 3456789 10 11 33333333 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 555555 6 7 8 9 10 11 66666 7 8 9 10 11 7777 8 9 10 11 888 9 10 11 9 9 10 11 10 11 (, •«f O EXERCISE SOURCES 1 12 2 12 3 12 4 12 5 12 6 12 7 12 8 12 9 12 10 12 11 12 1 13 2 13 3 13 4 13 5 13 6 13 7 13 8- 13 9 13 10 13 11 13 12 13 1 14 . 2 14 3 14 4 14 5 14 6 14 7 14 8 14 9 14 10 14 11 14 12 14 13 14 r 1 15 2 15 3 15 4 15 5 15 6 15 7 15 8 15 9 15 10 15 11 15 12 15 13 15 14 15 1 16 2 16 3 16 4 16 5 16 6 16 7 16 8 16 9 16 10 16 11 16 12 16 13 16 14 16 15 17 1 17 2 17 3 17 4 17 5 17 6 17 7 17 8 17 9 17 10 17 11 17 12 17 13 17 14 17 15 18 16 18 1 18 2 18 3 18 4 18 5 18 6 18 7 18 8 18 9 18 10 18 11 18 12 18 13 18 14 18 15 19 16 19 17 18 1 19 2 19 3 19 4 19 5 19 6 19 7 19 8 19 9 19 10 19 11 19 12 19 13 19 14 19 15 20 16 20 17 19 18 19 I 1 t 2 3 i 4 I 5 6 7 8 f 9 1 ! | 10 1 11 12 13 14 . 15 . 16 _. 17 18 19 . o o 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 ,CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND GAS TAX TAMARACK - CARLSBAD BLVD. TO 1-5^ ^CARLSBAD BLVD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT TAMARACK AVE - 1-5 TO HIGHLAND CD ARMY/NAVY ACADEMY AND CARLSBAD BLVD. WARNING LIGHTS SIGNAL - PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND PASEO DEL NORTE CD SIGNAL - EL CAMINO REAL AND PALOMAR AIRPORT TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT - EL CAMINO REAL CD TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT - ELM AVENUE SIGNAL - CARLSBAD BLVD AND CANNON ROAD TOTAL GAS TAX TOTALPROJECT. COST 976,000 1,500,000 340,000 4,500 115,000 65 000 20,000 35,000 45.000 3.100.500 CD THESE PROJECTS ARE FUNDED BY A COMBINATION OF SOURCES. A PRIMARY PORTION OF FUNDING IS SUPPLIED BY THE GAS TAX FUND. "THESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 CIP AND HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY INFLATION O PAIRED WEIGHTING EXE GAS TAX * 1 1 111' 11 1 234 5 67 89- 22 2 2 2 2 2 345 6 78 9 33 3 3 33 4 567 8 9 4 4 4 4 if 56789 5555 6789 . ' 6 6 6 789 7 7 89 8 9 RClQ • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • c CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND WATER FUND ' TOTAL" • PROJECT COST 1 TRI AGENCY PIPELINE INTERTIE^ 172,000 2 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - ELMWOOD ST., LACUNA DRIVE TO BUENA VISTA WAY. 28,200 3 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - MANZANO DRIVE TO PALOMAR AIRPORT DRIVE. 12,900 4 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - HILLSIDE DRIVE EAST OF PARK 25,000 5 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - OLIVE DRIVE, LAS FLORES DRIVE TO 18" LINE. 48,600 6 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - TERRAMAR LOOP - PARK DRIVE AND KELLY DRIVE TO TERRAMAR - 10" EASEMENT WATER LINE. 45,000 7 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - WASHINGTON ST., CEDAR AVE. TO GRAND AVE. 4,700 8 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - HILLSIDE DRIVE, HIGHLAND - DRIVE TO 170' WEST .OF PARK DRIVE. 18,500 9 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - LOCUST AVE., ADAMS ST. TO HARRISON STREET- 11,600 10 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - CREST DRIVE BUENA VISTA WAY AND FOREST AVE. _ 35,500 TOTAL WATER FUNDS 402,000 CO THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUPPORTED OUT OF REMAINING WATER BOND FUNDS. "THESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES .PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 CIP AND HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY INFLATION. . W PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCIsff WATER FUND 1 11 1 1 11 1 ' 1 23456789 10 22 2 2 2 222 3 4 56 7 8 910 3333333 45678 9 10 ^ /t 4 it ^ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 55555 6.7 8 9 10 ' 6 6 66 7 8 9 10 7 1 7 1 . 89.10 8 8 9 10 9 1.0 'i • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ".'"- ' O : O GENERAL FUND & FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING C.I.P. PAGE1 NO: A2 I. City Service Center - To replace overcrowded yard and provide capa- bility to expand as required. A4 2. Reserve for City Hall Expansion - To provide for relief from over- crowded conditions. A7 3. City Data Processing Center - To lease or purchase computer equip- ment to meet future needs. B2 4. Police Facility - To replace inadequate facility. C3 5. Fire Station No. 4 - To provide service to the Industrial, and com- mercial buildings in area of Palomar Airport Road and 1-5 and backup to downtown and La Costa areas. C4 6. Fire Station No.. 5/Training Facilities (optional) - To provide fire/rescue service, including crash fire rescue to Palomar Airport and adjoining industrial area. • . C6 '7. Fire Apparatus - Normal replacement for 1963 Ford pumper. C7 8. Aerial Platform - Elevated stream apparatus to serve increasing num- bers of major buildings, shopping centers and other large-"structures* C8 9. Fire Apparatus - Normal replacement for 1963 Ford pumper. D9 10. Larwin Park - An active community park southeast of El Camino Real and Elm Avenue. ' CIO II. Alta Mira Park - An active/passive community park in Alta Mira area. DM 12. Trail System - Seventy-five miles of bicycle, equestrian and pedes- trian trails in open space easements. DI2 13. Hosp Grove-Park - Passive community park with outdoor amphitheatre northeast of Elm Avenue and Monroe Street. DI3 14. La Costa Canyon Park Expansion. Active neighborhood park in the La Costa area. DI4 15. Alga Hills Park - Passive neighborhood park located in La Costa south of Alga Road. DI5 16. El Camino Glens Park - Active neighborhood park in La Costa north of Mission Estancia and Rancho.del Ponderosa. DI6 17. Carrillo Ranch Park - An active/passive neighborhood/community park located southeast of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real. C.I.P. PAGE NO.o o DI7 18. Calavera Community Park - Active neighborhood park in Calavera Hills area. DI8 19. Hub Park - An active/passive community/regional park on the southeast shore of Agua Hedionda Lagoon. DI9 20. Cannon Park Shelter House - A covered area for picnicing. D20 21. Cannon Park Comfort Station - Restroom facility to replace rented portable facilities. • D2I 22. San Marcos Creek Park - Active neighborhood park at the northeast end of San Marcos Canyon. . D22 23. Stage Coach Park - An active/passive park in southeast La Costa south- east of Rancho Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue. 023 24. Calavera Hills North Park - Active neighborhood park in the Calavera Hi I Is area. D24 25. Fuerte Park - Active neighborhood park adjacent to elementary school in La Costa Meadows:west of El Fuerte Street between Alicante and Alga Roads. ' 025 26. San Marcos. Canyon Park - Passive, natural community park In La Costa '. • east of the golf course. 026 27. El Camino Real Medians - Median landscaping .in scenic highway from Chestnut Avenue to Hosp Way. 027 28. Hoover Street Land Acquisition - Public access and beach-type facili- ties for lagoon users. • 028 29. Calavera Hills South Park - Active neighborhood park'in Calavera Hills area. E2 30. Children's Library - To.release room for adult services in main library. E4 31. Land for Branch Library - Obtain land for a future branch library be- fore cost becomes prohibitive. F3 32. Street Improvement - Monroe, Elm Avenue to Marron - To provide a con- necting link between two major arterials. F4 33. Street Improvement - Tamarack Avenue (Birch Avenue), Sunnyh?11 Drive to Skyline Drive.- Removal of constriction on a major arterial con- necting old Highway 101 and El Camino Real. F5 34. Street Improvement - Elm Avenue, Donna to El Camino Real - To provide a missing link in major roadway. Should be coordinated with installa- tion of traffic signal at Elm Avenue and El Camino Real and installa- tion of a water distribution line. -2- C.I.P. PAGE NO. o F8 35. Duck Feeding Area - Buena Vista Lagoon - To provide safe parking area and fencing. FI2 36. Civic Center Public Improvements - Construct half-street improvements including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights and paving on La- guna and adjacent to all fronting streets. FI4 37. .Park Drive at Marina - Widen and realign roadway eliminating unde- sirable curve. . FI6 38. Street Improvement - Carlsbad Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road - Elimination of bridge and construction of- grade "T" intersection. Eliminate dangerous intersection and facilitate beach parking. 69 39. Traffic Signal - Interstate 5 and Tamarack Avenue on the west ramp of 1-5 - Install a fully-actuated traffic signal. H3 40. Cherry Avenue Storm'Drain - East of Carlsbad Boulevard to the Pacific Ocean-- Eliminate localized flooding condition. H4 41. State Street Storm Drain - Eliminate flooding at Elm and State; Elm and' railroad and minimize the potential of flooding in buildings along State Street. f . - •. H5 42. Storm Drain - Elm Avenue, Jefferson to State - Extend CALTRANS con- structed storm drain to State Street. ' Kl 43. Agua Hedionda Lagoon Maintenance Program - Prepare designs and speci- fications for facilities, equipment and services to initiate an ac- tive maintenance program for the "middle and inner lagoons. -3- o SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND C.I.P. PAGE NO. 18 I. San Marcos/Carlsbad Sewage Transmission Line - Joint project to con- struct a parallel sewage transmission line south of Palomar Airport Road from El Camino Real to Encina facility. 19 2. Encina Water Pollution Control Facility - Phase III - Upgrade to in- clude secondary treatment and capacity to 18.0 MOD. NO 3. Vista/Carlsbad Sewage Transmission Line - Creek Section - Joint project with Vista to parallel an existing interceptor. Ill 4. Vista/Carlsbad Sewage Transmission Line - Downtown Section-. Joint project with Vista to construct parallel sewer from Roosevelt Street to Agua Hedionda pump station. 12 5. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - Homepiant Site - Con- struct a wet well with 30-minute capacity. . 13 6. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - Forest Lift Station - Construct a gravi.ty flow sewer line to allow abandonment of the Forest Lift Station. . (4 7. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - James Drive Lift Station Install a gravity flow sewer line to eliminate a marginally safe lift station. Should be done at same time as Park Drive Storm Drain from Hillside to Adams (H-7). 15 8. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - Carlsbad Boulevard and and Chinquapin Lift Station - Replace existing inadequate hazardously located lift station. Should be done in conjunction with Carlsbad Boulevard widening. 16 9. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - Home Plant - Replace pump house and upgrade pumping capacity. . o NON-CITY SOURCES C.I.P. PAGE NO. H6 . H7 J2 2. 3. F9 Fll F13 FI5. G4 G7 G8 610 Gil GI2 GI3 Jll 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Avenida Encinas Storm Drain -Toinsettia to Las Encinas - Required td eliminate stagnant water problem in open field. Park Drive Storm Drain - Hillside to Adams - Eliminate open ditch and reduce erosion siltation into Bristol Cove. Waterline - Industrial Park - Avenida Encinas South of Palomar Air- port Road - Provide a second source of water to industrial area; needed to meet fire flow requirements. • El Camino Real Widening at Highway 78 - CALTRANS project to widen east side of overcrossing. Street Lighting - La Costa Avenue - Install-additional street lights to meet four-lane secondary arterial lighting standards. Various Bike Routes - Construct as part of City's bicycle route sys- tem: Jefferson-Street from 1-5 to'Marron; La Costa Avenue from El Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe Road; Elm Avenue from Carlsbad Boule- vard to El Camino Real; Monroe Street/Park Drive from Marron Road to Kelly. Washington Street - Elm to Chestnut - Construct two-lane roadway to provide for neighborhood traffic circulation. Signal - Alga Road and El Camino Real - Necessitated by increased traffic loads. Signal - Elm Avenue and Interstate 5 - Install two fully-actuated traffic signals to meet increased traffic needs. 'Signal - Elm Avenue and Monroe Street - Facilitate turning moveme'nts and pedestrian activity after Monroe is extended to Marron. Signal - El Camino Real and Tamarack . Signal - El Camino Real and Elm - Control substantial traffic flow upon completion of Elm Avenue from Donna to El Camino Real. Signal - La Costa Avenue and Rancho Santa Fe Road - When required to meet traffic volumes from development east of Rancho Santa Fe Road. Signal - Marron Road and Monroe Street - Control traffic flow at Intersection after Monroe Street is extended .from Elm Avenue. Water Improvements - Avenida Encinas from Cannon Road to Burroughs Plant - Increase system reliability, fire flow and delete a deadend line; to be done concurrently with Avenida Encinas extension by de- veloper. • . C.I.P. PAGE NO... J)2 16. Water Improvements - Palomar Airport Road - Paseo del Norte to East 1750 feet - Install a parallel line to provide for Increased flow and back-up fire flow system. ' JI7 17. Water Improvements - Elm Avenue from Donna'Drive to El Camino Real •- To serve area above and around Elm Reservoir and to the east. Should be coordinated with construction of this section of Elm Avenue. JIB 18. Water Improvements - Janis Way, from Ellery site to El Camino Real ~ Provide water around Ellery Reservoir and help circulate the water' west and east. J24 19. Water Improvements - Walnut Avenue, from Madison Street to Tyler Street - Increase fire, flow in Roosevelt and Tyler Street areas. c WATER FUND C.I.P. PAGE NO. JI3 I. Water Improvements - Tri-agency PI peline Intertie - Provide a second source of water which could be critical in the event of failure of existing CMWD Iine. JI4 2. Water Improvements - Elmwood Street from Laguna Drive to Buena Vista Way - Improve system reliabiIity and fire flow capacity. JI5 3. Water Improvements - Manzano Drive to Palomar Airport Road - Improve fire flow and increase circulation. JI6 4. Water Improvements - Hillside Drive - East of Park Drive - Provide for increased flow into downtown pressure zone. JI9 5. Water Improvements - Olive Drive - Upgrade and replace deteriorated I ine. J20 6. Water Improvements - Terramar Loop - Park Drive and Ketley Drive to Terramar - 10" water/line in easement; improve system reliability and serve Hub Park; will benefit downtown and Terramar areas. * . J2I 7. Water Improvements - Washington Street - Cedar Avenue to Grand Ave- . . nue - Improve system reliability and fire flow; should coordinate with construction of Washington Street. ;r~ J22 8. Water Improvements - Hillside Drive from Highland Drive to I70T west of Park Drive - Improve system reliabiIity and fire flow. J23 9. Water Improvements - Locust Avenue from Adams to Harrison - Increase fire flow. J25 10. Water Improvements - Crest Drive, Buena Vista Way and Forest Avenue.- Necessary for fire protection in this area. GAS TAX C.I.P. PAGE NO. F6 I. Street Improvement - Tamarack Avenue - Carlsbad Boulevard to Inter- state 5 - Widen and realign to facilitate future traffic demands. F7 2. Carlsbad Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Replace deteriorated bridge over inlet to Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Widen to four lanes (plus bike, lanes) from Tamarack to Cannon Road. FIO 3. Tamarack Avenue - Interstate 5 to Highland - Widen and realign to fa- cilitate future traffic demands. FI7 4. Carlsbad Boulevard at Army/Navy Academy Warning Lights - To provide advance flashing warning lights at school crosswalk to athletic field area. G3 5. TrafficiSigrial - Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte - Install signal,-improve intersection geometries and widen Palomar-Airport . Road east:of,:,Interstate 5. . 65 6. Traffic Signal - El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road - Signalize intersection of two regionally significant major arterials. G6 7. Traffic Signal Interconnect - El Camino Real - Interconnect the fol- . lowing intersections on El Camino Real: State Highway 78, Plaza Way, Marron Road, Hosp Way, Elm Avenue (future). GI4 8. Traffic Signal - Interconnect - Elm Avenue - Interconnect the follow- ing intersections on Elm Avenue: State Street, Roosevelt, Harding Street, Interstate 5 and Pio Pico. • . . • GI5 9. Traffic Signal - Carlsbad Boulevard and Cannon Road - To handle in- creased traffic.