HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-01-23; City Council; Off Agenda; 1978-83 CIP project prioritization** • ' ^ *?• '• ' v O • • "i • • ^m
CITY OF CARLSBAD
AGENDA BILL NO. Initial:
Dept.Hd.
DATE: JANUARY 16, 1979 .•—r———' C. Atty.
DEPARTMENT; CITY MANAGER ' C. Mgr.
Subject:'~~"'
1978-83 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - PROJECT PRIORITIZATION
Statement of the Matter . , ,1 - ——™ " »• - *
In previous discussions concerning the Capital Improvement Program,
several members of the City Council indicated an interest in having
an opportunity to prioritize the projects under consideration prior
to staff preparation of the CIP Budget document. In response to
. this desire for front end input, the City Manager has instructed
Staff to prepare the attached project lists for Council consideration.
These lists include all projects that were included in the 1978-83
CIP less those projects included in the 1978-79 Budget.
EXHIBITS - .-•'•••
Paired Weighting Exercise
Description of Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATIONS , . -
If Council desires to prepare a priority list, each member s.hould
complete the paired weighting exercises and return them to the
City Manager as soon as possible.
DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1978
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: Assistant to the Finance Director
SUBJECT: THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE
INTRODUCTION
In previous discussions concerning the Capital Improvement Program,
several members of the City Council indicated an interest in having
an opportunity to prioritize the projects under consideration prior
to staff preparation of the CIP Budget document. In response to
this desire for front end input, the City Manager has instructed
Staff to prepare the attached project lists for Council consideration.
These lists include all projects that were included in the 1978-83
CIP less those projects included in the 1978-79 Budget.
The process of prioritizing ninety (90) capital improvement projects
is a relatively large task for a five member body to undertake
unless some objective measure of project priority can be established.
"Paired Weighting" is a process that provides the necessary objectivity.
Through this technique, each Council Member would prepare a priority
list for all CIP projects. The results of each member's work would
then be combined to give a group ranking that should very closely
resemble the majority opinion.
The attached tables and project lists may be used for this type of
exercise if the City Council would like to proceed. The following
section gives a more detailed description of the process.
PAIRED WEIGHTING
The paired weighting process is a technique that can be applied to
any list of items an individual or group wishes to rank. The
process itself includes comparing two items at a time, deciding
which is the most important, and circling that item. This process
is repeated until all projects have been compared to all other
projects.
The following example may make the process more clear. Using a
hypothetical list of five projects, a group of five individuals
is to decide the relative priority of these projects.
THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE
December 22, 1978
Page 2
FIGURE A
PROJECT PAIRED WEIGHTING TABLE SCORE
1 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2 ? 4 5 #1 ——
2 TRAFFIC SIGNALS . /4\ A q #2
v^r
3 GOVERNMENTAL BUILDINGS j 1 - #3
4 STORM DRAINS 1 #4
5 PARK IMPROVEMENTS #5
In each pair, the project number with the highest relative importance
to the individual doing the ranking should be circled. The first entry
in the table, in Figure A, (1/2) compares Project #1 - Street Improve-
ments, with Project #2 - Traffic Signals. If the individual feels that
street improvements are more important than traffic signals, #1 should
be circled. • The second pair of numbers, (1/3) compares #1 - Street
Improvements, with #3 - Governmental Buildings. In this example,
the individual has chosen street improvements as being more important
than governmental buildings by circling #1. This process is continued
for each pair of numbers on the table.
In completing the exercise, a few rules should be followed:
A) A choice must be made. One project number must
be circled in each pair.
B) Use your first impression. Do not spend a great
deal of time on each choice.
C) Confine your decision of relative value to the
two projects under consideration.
To illustrate the scoring technique, assume the above example has
been completed by five individuals. Each table would be scored
by counting the number of times a particular number has been circled.
In Figure B, the Number 1 has been circled four times, the Number 2
has been circled twice, etc. The total scores for each project are
shown at the right of the table.
THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE
December 22, 1978
Page 3
FIGURE B
PROJECT
1 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
2 TRAFFIC SIGNALS
3 GOVERNMENTAL BUILDINGS
4 STORM DRAINS
5 PARK IMPROVEMENTS
PAIRED WEIGHTING TABLE
Q
4 5
4" 5"
SCORE
#1
#5
The project scores for each individual are then combined, as shown
in Figure C, giving a total group score for each project. The final
rank appears at the right of Figure C. The final rank should be
reviewed by the group and adjustments made to any ranking that does
not meet with the approval of the majority.
FIGURE C
PROJECT
1
2
3
4
5
INDIVIDUAL SCORES
A
4
2
3
1
0
B
1
3
3
1
2
C
4
1
1
3
1
D
2
3
2
2
1
E
4
1
2
1
2
TOTAL 10 10 10 10 10
TOTAL SCORE
15
10
11
8
_6
50
FINAL
RANK
1
3
2
4
5
The Council should note that the cost figures supplied on the attached
Project Tables are frpm 12 to 15 months old. No adjustments have been
made for inflation or other factors effecting costs. These figures are
supplied as an indicator of the size of the projects with relation
to each other. They should be used only as a guide, not as a current
cost estimate. As the CIP document is prepared for Council review,
these figures will be updated to reflect any factors that have effected
the cost of these projects.
THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE
December 22, 1978
Page 4
THE CIP PROCESS
After the preliminary prioritization, there will be several
opportunities for the Council to review the CIP projects before
the final CIP Budget is prepared. The following is a brief
description of the proposed process which should lead to the
presentation of a five year Capital Improvement Program by the
end of March, 1979.
1) Council completes paired weighting exercise to establish a
priority listing. (Early January)
2) Staff begins preparation of revenue and expenditure, estimates
for five year period. (Early January)
3) Staff presents results of paired weighting exercise for
Council review with recommendations for amendments, if
necessary. (Mid-January)
4) Staff will merge the Council priority lists with funds available
to prepare preliminary CIP document. (Mid-February)
5) Staff will present preliminary funded CIP to Council for
review. (Early March)
6) Staff will make. Council recommended changes in preliminary
CIP and present final CIP for adoption. (Late March)
During the process, the Council will have the opportunity to amend
the CIP information at several points. The Council should take
advantage of these sessions to make whatever changes are necessary
to bring the CIP projects in line with Council policy. The staff
will incorporate any changes made by the Council prior to the
presentation of information at the next session. Some consideration
should be given to both fiscal and staff time limitations when
amending the CIP projects.
THE PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCISE
December 22, 1978
Page 5
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Proposition 13 Citizens Advisory Committee completed a paired
weighting exercise to prioritize the CIP projects under considera-
tion for the 1978-79 Budget. This was very successful as a tool
for creating consensus on the difficult problem of relative
project priorities. A tremendous amount of time was saved through
the use of a forty-five minute exercise.
The Staff recommends that the Council consider this type of ranking
exercise as part of the project prioritization process. The process
will require about one hour of concentration from each Council
Member. The results would be tabulated and made available as soon
as all members have completed the exercise. The Council could then
consider any adjustments to the resulting rank order at the next
Council meeting.
JAMES F. ELLIOTT
Assistant to the Finance Director
JFErvm
Att.
GITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND
GENERAL FUND AND FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
/1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
CITY SERVICE CENTER
CITY HALL EXPANSION RESERVE
DATA PROCESSING CENTER
POLICE FACILITY
FIRE STATION #4 (1-5 AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD)
FIRE STATION tt5 - TRAINING FACILITY
CEL CAMINO REAL & PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD)
•*•••
FIRE APPARATUS (1979-80 - REPLACE 1963 PUMPER)
^•-
AERIAL PLATFORM
FIRE APPARATUS (1982-83 - REPLACE 1963 PUMPER)
LARWIN PARK (1)
,(1)
.(1)
ALTAMIRA PARK
TRAIL SYSTEM
HOSP GROVE PARK'
LA COSTA CANYON PARK
ALGA HILLS PARK
EL CAMINO GLENS PARK
CARILLO RANCH
CALAVERA COMMUNITY PARK'
HUB PARK
CANNON PARK SHELTER HOUSE
CANNON PARK COMFORT STATION
.(1)
SAN MARCOS CREEK PARK (1)
STAGE COACH PARK(1)
TOTAL"
PROJECT COST
i
1,600,000;
|
450,000!
I
16 0, 0 0 0 :
i
2,470,000;
!
405,000 ti
700,000
110,000 [
200,000;i
125,000
372,000^
t
215,600
313,200
136,6.00 i
187,000^i
137,500.
237,500'iI
470,000!
1
396,000*
i
1,507,000'
6,050;
33,000
216,700
286,000;
CITY OF CARL5DAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND
GENERAL REVENUE AND FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING PAGE 2
24 CALAVERA HILLS NORTH PARK
25 FUERTE PARK
26 SAN MARCOS CANYON PARK
27 EL CAMINO REAL MEDIANS
28 HOOVER STREET LAND ACQUISITION
29 CALAVERA HILLS SOUTH PARK
30 CHILDREN'S LIBRARY^1)
31 LAND FOR BRANCH LIBRARY
MONROE - ELM AVENUE TO MARRON
TAMARACK - SUNNYHILL TO SKYLINE^1)
32
33
34
35
36
ELM AVENUE - DONNA DRIVE TO
EL CAMINO
DUCK FEEDING AREA - BUENA VISTA LAGOON
CIVIC CENTER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
37 PARK DRIVE AT MARINA - WIDEN AND RE-ALIGNCl)
38 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - CARLSBAD BLVD.
AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROADU;
39 SIGNAL - 1-5 AND TRAMARACK - WEST RAMP^1-*
40 CHERRY AVENUE STORM DRAIN
41 STATE STREET STORM DRAIN
42 STORM DRAIN - ELM AVENUE, JEFFERSON TO STATE -
43 AGUA HEDIENDA LAGOON MAINTENANCE PROGRAM^
TOTAL GENERAL FUND S FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
TOTAL"
PROJECT-COST
258,500
161,700
22,000
9,000
345,000
220,000
724,100
100,000
394,000
130,000
885,000
17,500
44,000
34,000 '
500,000
80,000
45,000
375,000
147,000
760,000
15,985.950
CO THESE PROJECTS ARE.FUNDED BY A COMBINATION OF
SOURCES. A PRIMARY PORTION OF FUNDING IS SUPPLIED
BY EITHER THE GENERAL OR FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND.
XTHESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 CIP AND
HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY INFLATION.
PAIRED -WEIGHTING EXERCISE
GENERAL FUND AND
1111111111111111
2 3- 4 5 6 7 -8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
222222222222222
3 4 5 6 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
33333333333333
4 5 6 7' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 . 17
. S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17
555555555555
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17
' 6 6 6-6 666 6 6 6 6
'1 8 S 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
7777777777
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
888838888.
.- ' '.9 10 11 12 13 '14. 15 16 17
9.99999991 10 11 12 15 14 IS 16 17
10 10' 10 10 10 10 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
11 11 11 11 11 11
. . . . 12 13 14 IS 16 17
i *
i ' . 12 12 12 12 12
\ 13 14 15 16 17
: ' 13 13 13 13
14 IS 15 17
. 14 14 14
- 15 16'. 17
15 15
. 15 17
\ , . 17
*
„• \ .
i . ...
18
2
18
3
18
18
5
18
6
18
18
8
IS
9
IS
10
IS
11
IS
12
IS
13
IS
14
IS
15
13
16
IS
17.
18
•
iy
2
iy
3
19
19
5
19
6
19
19
8iy
9
10iy
11
iy
12iy
13
14
iy
is
iy
16
19
17iy
is
20
2
3
20
20
S
20
6
20
20
8
20
9
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
13
2U
19
20
-
21
2
21
3
il
21
5
21
6
21
21
8
21
9
2.1
.10
21
11
21
'12
21
13
21
14
15
21
16
21
17
21
18
21
19
21
20
~2T
•
22
2
22
3
22
22
5
22
6
22
7
22
8
2'2
9
22
10
22
11
22
12
22
13
22
14
tl
15
22
16
22
17
22
IS
22
19
22
-~JL
'/I
22
25
2
23
3
23
23
S
23
6
23
23
8
25
9
25
10
23
11
12
23
13
25
14
23
IS
16
25
17
25
18
23
19
25
2j)_
?.i
23
22'
23
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
24
2
24
3
24
24
5
24
6
24
24
8
24
gr
24
10
24
11
24
12
24
13
24
14
24
IS
24
16
24
17
24
IS
24
19
24
20
•24
:.i
24
22
24
23
W
2s
2
, 2s
3
25
25
5
25
6
2b
8
25
9
2b
10
2s
11
23
12
13
14
2s
15
16
25
17
25
18
19
2i
20— 2T
'1.1
25
22'
25
23
.23
24
25
lllll'lllllllllllll
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 55 34 35 56 37 53 59 40 41 42 45
222222222222222222
26 27 28 29 30 51 32 33 34 35 36 37 33 39 40 41 42 43
3 3 3'3 3 V3 33 333 33 33333
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 55 36 37 33 39 40 41 42 45
26 27 28 29 . 30. 31 52 33 .34 35 56 37 53 33 40 41 42 _ 45
SS55S5 5. 55 -555555555
26 27 23 ' 29 30 31 32 • 33 34 35 56 37 53 59 40 41 42 43
666666666666666666
26 27 23 29 30, 31 32 33 34 35 35 57 33 39 40 41 42 45
7777'7 '777777-7777777
26 27 28 29 30 31 52 35 34 55 36 57 58 53 40 41 42 45
S88888888SS38S38SS
• 26 27 28. 29 30 31 32 33 54 55 36 37 33 53 40 41. 42 45
999999999999999999
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 . 56 37 53 39 40 41 42 43
10 10 . 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1C 10 10 10 ID
26 27 28 29 50 51 32 33 34 55 36 57 3s 59 40 41 42 43
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 35 57 58 33 40 41 42 45
' 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 54 55 55 37 53 59 40 41 42 43
• 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
26 27 2.3 29 30 31 32 35 34 35 35 57 33 59 40 41 42 45
14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
26 27 23 29 30 31 52 55 54 35 Jo 37 os ja 4U 41 42 4^
15 15 15 15 IS IS IS' 15 15 15 15 IS 15 15 IS 15 IS 13
26 27 28 29 50 51 32 35 54 35 56 57 3i 39 40 41 42 45
16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 16 16 16 16 15 15
26 27' 28 29 30 31 32 35 54 55 36 37 33 39 40 41 42 4j
17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
26 27 23 29 30 31 32 33 34 55 56 57 3S 35 40 41 42. 45
IS 18 38 IS 'IS IS IS 18 IS IS IS IS IS 13 ^S 13 IS :S
26 27 .28 29 30 31 32 33 34 55 36 57 33 5i 40 41 42 45
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 13 39 ID 19 19 19 -19 13 IS 1?
26' 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 54 35 56 57 is 33 40 41 42 45
20 20 20 20 '20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 7.S 20
26 27 2.fc 29 " • ~.»<T 5i "32 -33 ' "34"" 5S So S) •&- & 4u 41~ 42 " i'j"
n 21 '21-21 2-1 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 .21 .*!-.. il 21
26" 27 2$ 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 33 S3 40 -1- 42 4j .
22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
26 27 28 29 30 51 32 53 34 55 -56 57 58 39 40 41 42 4j
23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 2j
26 27 23 29 30 31 52 33 54 35 36 57 53. 53 40 41 42 43
24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2i
26 27 28 29 30 51 52 55 34 35 36 37 53 59 40 41 42 4o
2S 25-25 25.25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 53 34 55 36 37 53 59 40 41 42 4j
26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 25 26 26 25 25 26 26
27 28 29 50 51 32 35 54 35 56 57 53 59 40 41 42 4j
27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27
28 29 50 31 52 55 54 55 56 57 33 33 40 41 42 45
28 28 28 28 28 23 28 -23 28 23 23 2S 23 2S 23
29 50 31 32 33 34 55 36 57 53 53 40 41 42 45
- 29 29 29 29 29 29 2-9 29 29 29 29 29 29 2?
30 51 52 55 54 55 56 37 53 53 40 41 42 45
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50
"31" J2 ii J4 os JO o/ jS 59 40 41 4^ 45
31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
32 35 54 55 3o 57 58 59 40 41 42 45
32 52 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32
33 34 55 36 57 . 58 53 ~0 42 42 45
33 33 33 33 35 33 33 33 33 35
34 35 36 o7 53 o9 40 41 42 4.;
34 34 34 34 34 34 54 ' 34 34
35 56 57 53 59 40 41 4' 45
35 35 35 ^5 j5 35 35 55
56 57 jS 59 40 41 42 "45
' 35 36 35 36 35 36 55
4>7 ^3 ;9 40 41 42 45
» . -7 .>7 o7 37 37 37
• 38 33 40 41 42 45
•33 33 33 33 33
39 40 41 42 45
39 39 39 32
40 41 42 43
.''•'. 40 40 43
41 42 45
41 41
42 45. . - «
42
- ' •
1
2
3
4
5 :'
6
-,
3
3
13
n
12
.-
,;
15
17 •
•>?
,^
20
31
1
t '
22 * '
--
„ .
25
26
27
23
29
50
31
32
3.5.
_ f
J3
35
37
33
_^
40
41
,,
, ..
CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND
SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND
CIP
PAGE
NO.
1 SAN MARCOS/CARLSABD SEWAGE TRANSMISSION LINE
2 ENCINA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL - PHASE II
3 VISTA/CARLSBAD SEWAGE TRANSMISSION LINE - '
CREEK SECTION
4 VISTA/CARLSBAD SEWAGE TRANSMISSION LINE -
DOWNTOWN SECTION
5 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT -
HOMEPLANT SITE - WET WELL
6 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT -
FOREST LIFT STATION
7 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT -
JAMES DRIVE LIFT STATION
8 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT -
CARLSBAD BLVD & CHINQUAPIN LIFT STATION
9 SEWER LIFT STATION UPGRADING AND REPLACEMENT -
HOMEPLANT - PUMPHOUSE
TOTAL SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND
CD A MAJOR PORTION OF THE FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT
WILL BE SUPPLIED BY A CONSTRUCTION BOND ISSUE.
TOTAL
PROJECT COST
770,000
2,000,000
100,000
140,000
59,700
50,900
23,600
45,000
56,000
3>245,200
XTHESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 CIP
AND HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY
INFLATION.
G PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERClO
SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND
1 1 1 1 1 11 1
2 34 5 67 89
22222 2 2
3 4 567 8 9
3 33 3 3 3
4 5 67 8 9
44444
5 67 8 9
5555
6789
6 6 6
...':. 78 9
/ 7 7
8 9
8 '
9
,; i
v •
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 .
8
9
ZIP
"AGE
O O
' CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND
' NON-CITY SOURCES
•
TOTALX
W>.__ . PROJECT COST ;
H6
H7
J2
F9
Fll
F13
F15
G4
G7
G8
G10
Gil
G12
G13
Jll
J12
J17
J18
J24
. •
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16-'
17
18
19
CO
C2)
C3)
5CTHESE
(IVAVENIDA ENCINAS STORM DRAIN
PARK DRIVE STORM DRAIN
WATERLINE - INDUSTRIAL PARK, AVENIDA ENCINAS
SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD^1-*
EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING AT HIGHWAY 78^3-> :
STREET LIGHTING - LA COSTA AVENUE^2^
VARIOUS BIKE ROUTES(3)
WASHINGTON STREET - ELM TO CHESTNUT(3)
SIGNAL - ALGA ROAD AND EL CAMINO REAL^1^
SIGNAL - ELM AVENUE AND 1-5^'
SIGNAL-- ELM AVENUE AND MONROE STREET^
SIGNAL - EL CAMINO REAL AND TAMARACK ^^
SIGNAL - EL CAMINO REAL AND ELM AVENUE^2)
SIGNAL - LA COSTA AVENUE AND RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD(1)
SIGNAL - MARRON ROAD AND MONROE STREET^ 1^
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - AVENIDA ENCINAS, CANNON
ROAD TO BURROUGHS PLANED
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD,
PASEO DEL NORTE TO THE EAST 1750 FEET. CO
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - ELM AVENUE, DONNA DRIVE TO
EL CAMINO REALCO
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - JANIS WAY, ELLERY SITE TO
EL CAMINO REAL
WATER IMPROVEMENTS - WALNUT AVENUE, MADISON STREET
TO TYLER STREET.
TOTAL NON-CITY SOURCES
DEVELOPERS/PROPERTY OWNERS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
OTHER SOURCES
FIGURES ARE BASED ON 'ESTIMATES PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 C
HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY INFLATI
400,000
215,000
80,000
1,600,000
25,000
74,000
505,000
60,000
80,000
55,000
55,000
55,000
55,000 .
55,000
66,700
-
41,000
52,000
33,400
18,200
3,525,300
IP AND
ON.
o PAIRED WEIGHTING
NON-CITY
iiiiiiiiii
23456789 10 11
222222222
3456789 10 11
33333333
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
4 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
555555
6 7 8 9 10 11
66666
7 8 9 10 11
7777
8 9 10 11
888
9 10 11
9 9
10 11
10
11
(,
•«f
O
EXERCISE
SOURCES
1
12
2
12
3
12
4
12
5
12
6
12
7
12
8
12
9
12
10
12
11
12
1
13
2
13
3
13
4
13
5
13
6
13
7
13
8-
13
9
13
10
13
11
13
12
13
1
14
. 2
14
3
14
4
14
5
14
6
14
7
14
8
14
9
14
10
14
11
14
12
14
13
14
r
1
15
2
15
3
15
4
15
5
15
6
15
7
15
8
15
9
15
10
15
11
15
12
15
13
15
14
15
1
16
2
16
3
16
4
16
5
16
6
16
7
16
8
16
9
16
10
16
11
16
12
16
13
16
14
16
15
17
1
17
2
17
3
17
4
17
5
17
6
17
7
17
8
17
9
17
10
17
11
17
12
17
13
17
14
17
15
18
16
18
1
18
2
18
3
18
4
18
5
18
6
18
7
18
8
18
9
18
10
18
11
18
12
18
13
18
14
18
15
19
16
19
17
18
1
19
2
19
3
19
4
19
5
19
6
19
7
19
8
19
9
19
10
19
11
19
12
19
13
19
14
19
15
20
16
20
17
19
18
19
I
1 t
2
3
i
4 I
5
6
7
8 f
9 1
!
|
10 1
11
12
13
14 .
15 .
16 _.
17
18
19 .
o o
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
,CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND
GAS TAX
TAMARACK - CARLSBAD BLVD. TO 1-5^
^CARLSBAD BLVD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
TAMARACK AVE - 1-5 TO HIGHLAND CD
ARMY/NAVY ACADEMY AND CARLSBAD BLVD.
WARNING LIGHTS
SIGNAL - PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND
PASEO DEL NORTE CD
SIGNAL - EL CAMINO REAL AND PALOMAR AIRPORT
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT - EL CAMINO REAL CD
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT - ELM AVENUE
SIGNAL - CARLSBAD BLVD AND CANNON ROAD
TOTAL GAS TAX
TOTALPROJECT. COST
976,000
1,500,000
340,000
4,500
115,000
65 000
20,000
35,000
45.000
3.100.500
CD THESE PROJECTS ARE FUNDED BY A COMBINATION OF SOURCES.
A PRIMARY PORTION OF FUNDING IS SUPPLIED BY THE GAS TAX FUND.
"THESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 CIP
AND HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY INFLATION
O PAIRED WEIGHTING EXE
GAS TAX
*
1 1 111' 11 1
234 5 67 89-
22 2 2 2 2 2
345 6 78 9
33 3 3 33
4 567 8 9
4 4 4 4 if
56789
5555
6789
. ' 6 6 6
789
7 7
89
8
9
RClQ •
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
•
c
CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL PROJECT LIST BY FUND
WATER FUND
' TOTAL" •
PROJECT COST
1 TRI AGENCY PIPELINE INTERTIE^ 172,000
2 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - ELMWOOD ST., LACUNA DRIVE
TO BUENA VISTA WAY. 28,200
3 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - MANZANO DRIVE TO PALOMAR
AIRPORT DRIVE. 12,900
4 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - HILLSIDE DRIVE EAST OF PARK 25,000
5 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - OLIVE DRIVE, LAS FLORES
DRIVE TO 18" LINE. 48,600
6 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - TERRAMAR LOOP - PARK DRIVE
AND KELLY DRIVE TO TERRAMAR - 10" EASEMENT
WATER LINE. 45,000
7 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - WASHINGTON ST., CEDAR AVE.
TO GRAND AVE. 4,700
8 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - HILLSIDE DRIVE, HIGHLAND -
DRIVE TO 170' WEST .OF PARK DRIVE. 18,500
9 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - LOCUST AVE., ADAMS ST.
TO HARRISON STREET- 11,600
10 WATER IMPROVEMENTS - CREST DRIVE
BUENA VISTA WAY AND FOREST AVE. _ 35,500
TOTAL WATER FUNDS 402,000
CO THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUPPORTED OUT OF REMAINING
WATER BOND FUNDS.
"THESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES .PREPARED FOR THE 1978-83 CIP
AND HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT COST CHANGES CAUSED BY
INFLATION.
. W PAIRED WEIGHTING EXERCIsff
WATER FUND
1 11 1 1 11 1 ' 1
23456789 10
22 2 2 2 222
3 4 56 7 8 910
3333333
45678 9 10
^ /t 4 it ^ 4
5 6 7 8 9 10
55555
6.7 8 9 10
' 6 6 66
7 8 9 10
7 1 7 1 .
89.10
8 8
9 10
9
1.0
'i
•
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
".'"- ' O : O
GENERAL FUND & FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
C.I.P.
PAGE1 NO:
A2 I. City Service Center - To replace overcrowded yard and provide capa-
bility to expand as required.
A4 2. Reserve for City Hall Expansion - To provide for relief from over-
crowded conditions.
A7 3. City Data Processing Center - To lease or purchase computer equip-
ment to meet future needs.
B2 4. Police Facility - To replace inadequate facility.
C3 5. Fire Station No. 4 - To provide service to the Industrial, and com-
mercial buildings in area of Palomar Airport Road and 1-5 and
backup to downtown and La Costa areas.
C4 6. Fire Station No.. 5/Training Facilities (optional) - To provide
fire/rescue service, including crash fire rescue to Palomar Airport
and adjoining industrial area. • .
C6 '7. Fire Apparatus - Normal replacement for 1963 Ford pumper.
C7 8. Aerial Platform - Elevated stream apparatus to serve increasing num-
bers of major buildings, shopping centers and other large-"structures*
C8 9. Fire Apparatus - Normal replacement for 1963 Ford pumper.
D9 10. Larwin Park - An active community park southeast of El Camino Real
and Elm Avenue. '
CIO II. Alta Mira Park - An active/passive community park in Alta Mira area.
DM 12. Trail System - Seventy-five miles of bicycle, equestrian and pedes-
trian trails in open space easements.
DI2 13. Hosp Grove-Park - Passive community park with outdoor amphitheatre
northeast of Elm Avenue and Monroe Street.
DI3 14. La Costa Canyon Park Expansion. Active neighborhood park in the La
Costa area.
DI4 15. Alga Hills Park - Passive neighborhood park located in La Costa south
of Alga Road.
DI5 16. El Camino Glens Park - Active neighborhood park in La Costa north of
Mission Estancia and Rancho.del Ponderosa.
DI6 17. Carrillo Ranch Park - An active/passive neighborhood/community park
located southeast of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real.
C.I.P.
PAGE NO.o o
DI7 18. Calavera Community Park - Active neighborhood park in Calavera Hills
area.
DI8 19. Hub Park - An active/passive community/regional park on the southeast
shore of Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
DI9 20. Cannon Park Shelter House - A covered area for picnicing.
D20 21. Cannon Park Comfort Station - Restroom facility to replace rented
portable facilities. •
D2I 22. San Marcos Creek Park - Active neighborhood park at the northeast
end of San Marcos Canyon. .
D22 23. Stage Coach Park - An active/passive park in southeast La Costa south-
east of Rancho Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue.
023 24. Calavera Hills North Park - Active neighborhood park in the Calavera
Hi I Is area.
D24 25. Fuerte Park - Active neighborhood park adjacent to elementary school
in La Costa Meadows:west of El Fuerte Street between Alicante and Alga
Roads. '
025 26. San Marcos. Canyon Park - Passive, natural community park In La Costa
'. • east of the golf course.
026 27. El Camino Real Medians - Median landscaping .in scenic highway from
Chestnut Avenue to Hosp Way.
027 28. Hoover Street Land Acquisition - Public access and beach-type facili-
ties for lagoon users. •
028 29. Calavera Hills South Park - Active neighborhood park'in Calavera Hills
area.
E2 30. Children's Library - To.release room for adult services in main library.
E4 31. Land for Branch Library - Obtain land for a future branch library be-
fore cost becomes prohibitive.
F3 32. Street Improvement - Monroe, Elm Avenue to Marron - To provide a con-
necting link between two major arterials.
F4 33. Street Improvement - Tamarack Avenue (Birch Avenue), Sunnyh?11 Drive
to Skyline Drive.- Removal of constriction on a major arterial con-
necting old Highway 101 and El Camino Real.
F5 34. Street Improvement - Elm Avenue, Donna to El Camino Real - To provide
a missing link in major roadway. Should be coordinated with installa-
tion of traffic signal at Elm Avenue and El Camino Real and installa-
tion of a water distribution line.
-2-
C.I.P.
PAGE NO.
o
F8 35. Duck Feeding Area - Buena Vista Lagoon - To provide safe parking area
and fencing.
FI2 36. Civic Center Public Improvements - Construct half-street improvements
including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights and paving on La-
guna and adjacent to all fronting streets.
FI4 37. .Park Drive at Marina - Widen and realign roadway eliminating unde-
sirable curve. .
FI6 38. Street Improvement - Carlsbad Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road -
Elimination of bridge and construction of- grade "T" intersection.
Eliminate dangerous intersection and facilitate beach parking.
69 39. Traffic Signal - Interstate 5 and Tamarack Avenue on the west ramp of
1-5 - Install a fully-actuated traffic signal.
H3 40. Cherry Avenue Storm'Drain - East of Carlsbad Boulevard to the Pacific
Ocean-- Eliminate localized flooding condition.
H4 41. State Street Storm Drain - Eliminate flooding at Elm and State; Elm
and' railroad and minimize the potential of flooding in buildings
along State Street.
f . - •.
H5 42. Storm Drain - Elm Avenue, Jefferson to State - Extend CALTRANS con-
structed storm drain to State Street. '
Kl 43. Agua Hedionda Lagoon Maintenance Program - Prepare designs and speci-
fications for facilities, equipment and services to initiate an ac-
tive maintenance program for the "middle and inner lagoons.
-3-
o
SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND
C.I.P.
PAGE NO.
18 I. San Marcos/Carlsbad Sewage Transmission Line - Joint project to con-
struct a parallel sewage transmission line south of Palomar Airport
Road from El Camino Real to Encina facility.
19 2. Encina Water Pollution Control Facility - Phase III - Upgrade to in-
clude secondary treatment and capacity to 18.0 MOD.
NO 3. Vista/Carlsbad Sewage Transmission Line - Creek Section - Joint project
with Vista to parallel an existing interceptor.
Ill 4. Vista/Carlsbad Sewage Transmission Line - Downtown Section-. Joint
project with Vista to construct parallel sewer from Roosevelt Street
to Agua Hedionda pump station.
12 5. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - Homepiant Site - Con-
struct a wet well with 30-minute capacity. .
13 6. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - Forest Lift Station -
Construct a gravi.ty flow sewer line to allow abandonment of the Forest
Lift Station. .
(4 7. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - James Drive Lift Station
Install a gravity flow sewer line to eliminate a marginally safe lift
station. Should be done at same time as Park Drive Storm Drain from
Hillside to Adams (H-7).
15 8. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - Carlsbad Boulevard and
and Chinquapin Lift Station - Replace existing inadequate hazardously
located lift station. Should be done in conjunction with Carlsbad
Boulevard widening.
16 9. Sewer Lift Station Upgrading and Replacement - Home Plant - Replace
pump house and upgrade pumping capacity. .
o
NON-CITY SOURCES
C.I.P.
PAGE NO.
H6 .
H7
J2
2.
3.
F9
Fll
F13
FI5.
G4
G7
G8
610
Gil
GI2
GI3
Jll
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Avenida Encinas Storm Drain -Toinsettia to Las Encinas - Required td
eliminate stagnant water problem in open field.
Park Drive Storm Drain - Hillside to Adams - Eliminate open ditch and
reduce erosion siltation into Bristol Cove.
Waterline - Industrial Park - Avenida Encinas South of Palomar Air-
port Road - Provide a second source of water to industrial area;
needed to meet fire flow requirements. •
El Camino Real Widening at Highway 78 - CALTRANS project to widen
east side of overcrossing.
Street Lighting - La Costa Avenue - Install-additional street lights
to meet four-lane secondary arterial lighting standards.
Various Bike Routes - Construct as part of City's bicycle route sys-
tem: Jefferson-Street from 1-5 to'Marron; La Costa Avenue from El
Camino Real to Rancho Santa Fe Road; Elm Avenue from Carlsbad Boule-
vard to El Camino Real; Monroe Street/Park Drive from Marron Road to
Kelly.
Washington Street - Elm to Chestnut - Construct two-lane roadway to
provide for neighborhood traffic circulation.
Signal - Alga Road and El Camino Real - Necessitated by increased
traffic loads.
Signal - Elm Avenue and Interstate 5 - Install two fully-actuated
traffic signals to meet increased traffic needs.
'Signal - Elm Avenue and Monroe Street - Facilitate turning moveme'nts
and pedestrian activity after Monroe is extended to Marron.
Signal - El Camino Real and Tamarack .
Signal - El Camino Real and Elm - Control substantial traffic flow
upon completion of Elm Avenue from Donna to El Camino Real.
Signal - La Costa Avenue and Rancho Santa Fe Road - When required to
meet traffic volumes from development east of Rancho Santa Fe Road.
Signal - Marron Road and Monroe Street - Control traffic flow at
Intersection after Monroe Street is extended .from Elm Avenue.
Water Improvements - Avenida Encinas from Cannon Road to Burroughs
Plant - Increase system reliability, fire flow and delete a deadend
line; to be done concurrently with Avenida Encinas extension by de-
veloper. • .
C.I.P.
PAGE NO...
J)2 16. Water Improvements - Palomar Airport Road - Paseo del Norte to East
1750 feet - Install a parallel line to provide for Increased flow and
back-up fire flow system. '
JI7 17. Water Improvements - Elm Avenue from Donna'Drive to El Camino Real •-
To serve area above and around Elm Reservoir and to the east. Should
be coordinated with construction of this section of Elm Avenue.
JIB 18. Water Improvements - Janis Way, from Ellery site to El Camino Real ~
Provide water around Ellery Reservoir and help circulate the water'
west and east.
J24 19. Water Improvements - Walnut Avenue, from Madison Street to Tyler
Street - Increase fire, flow in Roosevelt and Tyler Street areas.
c
WATER FUND
C.I.P.
PAGE NO.
JI3 I. Water Improvements - Tri-agency PI peline Intertie - Provide a second
source of water which could be critical in the event of failure of
existing CMWD Iine.
JI4 2. Water Improvements - Elmwood Street from Laguna Drive to Buena Vista
Way - Improve system reliabiIity and fire flow capacity.
JI5 3. Water Improvements - Manzano Drive to Palomar Airport Road - Improve
fire flow and increase circulation.
JI6 4. Water Improvements - Hillside Drive - East of Park Drive - Provide
for increased flow into downtown pressure zone.
JI9 5. Water Improvements - Olive Drive - Upgrade and replace deteriorated
I ine.
J20 6. Water Improvements - Terramar Loop - Park Drive and Ketley Drive to
Terramar - 10" water/line in easement; improve system reliability
and serve Hub Park; will benefit downtown and Terramar areas.
* .
J2I 7. Water Improvements - Washington Street - Cedar Avenue to Grand Ave-
. . nue - Improve system reliability and fire flow; should coordinate
with construction of Washington Street. ;r~
J22 8. Water Improvements - Hillside Drive from Highland Drive to I70T west
of Park Drive - Improve system reliabiIity and fire flow.
J23 9. Water Improvements - Locust Avenue from Adams to Harrison - Increase
fire flow.
J25 10. Water Improvements - Crest Drive, Buena Vista Way and Forest Avenue.-
Necessary for fire protection in this area.
GAS TAX
C.I.P.
PAGE NO.
F6 I. Street Improvement - Tamarack Avenue - Carlsbad Boulevard to Inter-
state 5 - Widen and realign to facilitate future traffic demands.
F7 2. Carlsbad Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Replace deteriorated bridge
over inlet to Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Widen to four lanes (plus bike,
lanes) from Tamarack to Cannon Road.
FIO 3. Tamarack Avenue - Interstate 5 to Highland - Widen and realign to fa-
cilitate future traffic demands.
FI7 4. Carlsbad Boulevard at Army/Navy Academy Warning Lights - To provide
advance flashing warning lights at school crosswalk to athletic field
area.
G3 5. TrafficiSigrial - Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte - Install
signal,-improve intersection geometries and widen Palomar-Airport
. Road east:of,:,Interstate 5. .
65 6. Traffic Signal - El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road - Signalize
intersection of two regionally significant major arterials.
G6 7. Traffic Signal Interconnect - El Camino Real - Interconnect the fol-
. lowing intersections on El Camino Real: State Highway 78, Plaza Way,
Marron Road, Hosp Way, Elm Avenue (future).
GI4 8. Traffic Signal - Interconnect - Elm Avenue - Interconnect the follow-
ing intersections on Elm Avenue: State Street, Roosevelt, Harding
Street, Interstate 5 and Pio Pico. • . . •
GI5 9. Traffic Signal - Carlsbad Boulevard and Cannon Road - To handle in-
creased traffic.