HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-05-15; City Council; 5845; Encina facility expansion precise planCITY OF CARLSBAD
Initial
AGENDA BILL NO: Q Y 1 O ; Dept. Hd.
DATE: May 15. 1979 1_ °tY' Atty ~> •
Cty. Mgr. r\
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
SUBJECT: PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN -1 '
ENCINA WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY, EXPANSION AND UPGRADING
TO SECONDARY TREATMENT. '
APPLICANT; JAC ^
Statement of the Matter
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter-on April 25
1979, and has recommended approval of the expansion and upgrading as
requested by JAC. < This meeting was attended by citizens living in the
AltaMira Development which is. on the east side of 1-5 to the southeast •
of -the _ Encina treatment plant; their area has received most-ofthe
offensive odors emitted from the Ehcina plant in-the. recent past. These
citizens requested that Encina not be. expanded until the upgrading has
been determined to be effective in controlling odors. -
The Planning Commission, however, recommended approval of the expansion
as .well as the upgrading since they felt that doing both together is cost
effective and there is a need for additional sewer capacity. The Commission
recommends conditions of approval as suggested by staff with a modification
to;Condition 7 to have further research on the noise-possibilities; modi-
tying 13-to require screening from all adjacent residential development or
future development; adding a condition to control dust during grading, and
addrng a condition requiring that research be-done to develop proper methods
to dispose of sludge. •'
<•
The Planning Commission was concerned about water reclamation. They felt-
that the EIR as drafted for this expansion did not adequately review the
present water availability problem in California. Therefore, they have
asked the City Council to study the need for water reclamation at Encina-
how it can be done, and its possible uses. •
Exhibits . • '
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1514
Staff.Report dated April 25, 1979
Letter from the Loomis Company dated April 30, 1979.
Recommendation
The Planning Staff and Planning Commission have both recommended approval
of Precise Plan No. 1. If the City Council concurs, you should direct the
City Attorney to prepare documents approving Precise Plan No. 1 as per
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1514.
Furthermore, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council
airect the preparation of a study for reclaiming water from the Encina
treatment plant. ' •
BPtjd • - •
AGENDA BILL 5845 Page 2
COUNCIL ACTION:
5-15-79 Council continued the public hearing to the next regular meeting
to be held June 5, 1979.
6-5-79 Council directed the City Attorney to prepare the necessary doaments
approving Precise Plan No. 1 as per Planning Commission Resolution
No. 1514, subject to scrutiny of the conditions to insure that
the conditions properly reflect the City's commitment to the
mitigation of adverse impacts identified in the EIR and further
that those items that deal with purely technical matters be
examined as to their appropriateness ' in any conditions connected
with the approval of the POP.
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1514
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
3 APPROVAL OF PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 FOR THE
EXPANSION OF THE ENCINA.WATER POLLUTION CONTROL
4 FACILITY (FROM 13.75 TO 18 MGD) AND UPGRADING
TO SECONDARY TREATMENT, IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH
5 FEDERAL AND STATE, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED WEST OF 1-5 BETWEEN POINTSETTIA LANE
6 AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD.
7 CASE NO.: PDP-1
APPLICANT: LES EVANS, ENCINA JOINT POWERS
8
9
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City
10
of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission? and
11 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
12
as provided by Title 21of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
13
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code
14
the Planning Commission did on the 25th day of April, 1979,
15 ~
hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by
16
applicants for a Precise Plan to allow the expansion of the
17
Encina Water Pollution Control Facility from 13.75 mgd to 18 mgd,
18
and to upgrade to secondary treatment, in order to comply with
19
Federal and State Laws, on property more specifically described
20
as:
21
That portion of Lot 1, Fraction Section 20, Township
22 12 South, Range 4 West, S.B.M., in the County of
San Diego, State of California, according to U.S.
23 Government Survey approved October 25, 1875; and
24 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did consider the environ-
25 j mental effects of said request as indicated in an environmental
26 impact report (dated February 1975) that had been certified by
27 the Vista Sanitation District by Resolution No. 75-19; and
28 //
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering
the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired
to be heard, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the proposed Precise Development Plan (PDP-1), and
found the following facts and reasons to exist:
1. The Precise Development Plan ensures the compatibility of
the project with the City's General Plan for the following .
reasons:
a. The General Plan Land Use Element designates the subject
property for a public utility use.
b. The project is consistent with the goal and policy of
the public facilities element of the General Plan.
2. The proposed Precise Development Plan ensures the compatibilit}
of the development with surrounding development for the
following reasons:
a. Conditions are imposed as part of this approval that
mitigate most significant impacts resulting from the
project.
b. The development is located in a depressed area that
can easily be buffered in order to prevent adverse
impacts to adjacent properties.
3. The proposed project conforms to the California Environmental
Quality Act, and the Carlsbad Environmental Protection
Ordinance since:
a. An EIR has been prepared and certified by the lead
agency.
b. Although it was found that the project may have sign-
ificant adverse environmental impacts, said lead agency
has found overriding considerations justifying approval
of the project.
c. Adequate measures to mitigate significant impacts are
included as part of the required approvals.
d. The City, acting as responsible agency, has considered
this EIR in approving the project.
e. Other environmental agencies have conditionally ap-
proved the project.
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
re
ce
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The proposed Precise Development Plan provides for
necessary public improvements as necessitated by the develop-
ment since conditions are imposed which require such
improvements.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the following vote,
recommended approval of Precise Development Plan (PDP-1) with
certain conditions:
Development of the site shall occur as shown on PDP-1 Exhibit:
A and B, dated 4/11/79, and Exhibit D, dated 4/9/79; except
for modifications that are contained herein, and minor
modifications approved by the Public Works Administrator.
In addition to the approval of the development indicated
in the Exhibits noted in Condition No. 1, all other
requirements listed in this approval shall be indicated on.
the final Precise Development Plan.
Grading plans shall be approved by the Public Works Adminis-
trator or his designee, prior to this issuance of a building
permit. Said plans shall include provisions to limit
grading to the minimum area necessary for construction of
the facilities.
Surfaces shall be graded to direct runoff toward designed
drainage facilities and away from cut and fill slopes.
Land shall not be cleared of vegetation except immediately
before grading, and all slopes shall be established for
erosion control immediately upon completion of such grading.
Netive vegetation shall be retained wherever feasible.
Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for the
entire facility and subject to the approval of the Planning
Director. The landscaping shall be designed to screen
facilities from views along 1-5, and surrounding properties.
Plans shall include fast growing tall trees, as well as a
combination of shrubs and ground cover. Plants shall be
drought tolerant to the maximum extent feasible, and fire
retardent whre necessary. Said landscape and irrigation
shall be installed immediately upon completion of constructio^,
except that all screening landscaping shall be installed
upon completion of grading, prior to any construction.
A noise study shall be performed by a qualified noise
expert in order to establish acceptable noise levels at
the property line of the treatment facility. Based on this
study and subject to the approval of the City Engineer, all
noise producing mechanisms and facilities shall be shielded
and buffered in such a manner so as to reduce noise levels
to the acceptable level.
-3-
'****'
1 8. All influent wastewater shall be pre-treated in order to
remove odors. In addition, the screening structures, grit
g removal tanks, primary sedimentation tanks, and all open
channels, including primary effluent channels, shall be
3 covered and ventilated in order to remove odors.
4 9. Odor removal towers are required and shall be delineated
on the final Precise Development Plan, subject to the
5 approval of the Public Works Administrator.
6 10. Fire hydrants shall be placed on the site as required and
approved by the Fire Marshall.
7 11. All necessary public improvements shall be installed subject
8 to the approval of the City Engineer. Said improvements
shall include the extension of the existing 10" water line
9 along Avenida Encinas, from the northerly boundary of the
treatment facility to its southerly boundary.
10
12. All storm drain and channel designs shall be subject to
11 the approval of the City Engineer.
12 13. The placement of equipment on any roof tops shall be screened
from views along 1-5 and from adjacent properties and subject
13 to the approval of the Planning Director.
14 14. All lighting shall be designed in a manner that will not
adversely affect nearby residences or public roadways.
15 A lighting plan shall be subject to the approval fo the
Planning Director.
16
15. Upon approval, the applicant shall submit a reproducible
17 copy of the Precise Development Plan which incorporates all
requirements of the approval to the City Manager for
18 signature. Prior to signing the final Precise Development
Plan, the City Manager shall determine that all applicable
19 requirements have been incorporated into the plan and that
all conditions of approval have been satisfactorily met or
20 otherwise guaranteed. The final signed Precise Development
Plan shall be the official site layout plan for the
21 property and shall be attached to any application for a
building permit on the subject property.
22
16. Special provisions to control dust which is generated by
23 grading activities shall be approved by the City Engineer
prior to commencement of grading.
24
17. A "sludge disposal alternative" study shall be prepared
25 by a qualified person, and subject to the approval of the
Public Works Administrator or his designee. The most
26 feasible sludge disposal alternative which would reduce
the greatest number of negative impacts shall be incorporated
27 into the subject project.
28 //
—4—
AYES: L'Heureux, Schick, Marcus, Jose, Larson
2 NOES: None
3 ABSTAIN: Rombotis
4 ABSENT: Wrench
5 WHEREAS, the permit for this Precise Development Plan shall
g become null and void: (1) when any time specified in the permit
7 has expired; or (2) if the permit is not used within one year
3 after the adoption of this resolution unless it is extended one
9 or more times by the Planning Commission for an additional period
10 of time; however, no request for an extension of time shall be
11 granted if the request is made after the expiration date of the
12 original permit or term for performance of the condition or
13 extension thereof,
14 NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of
15 Carlsbad does hereby recommend approval of PDP-1 as submitted by
16 the applicant for the development of said property, in accordance
17 with Exhibits on file in the Planning Department Office, and by
18 reference made a part hereof.
19
20
STEPHEN M. L'HEUREUX, Chairman
21
ATTEST:
22
23
24 JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
25"
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CARLSBAD )ss
I, JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly
introduced, approved and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad at a regular meeting
of said Commission held on the 9th day of May, 1979,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: . .-
JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
PDP-1
-6-
c.
PC DATE:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CASE NO.:
REQUEST:
STAFF REPORT
April 25, 1979
March 16, 1979
Planning Commission
Planning Department
Precise Development Plan (PDP-1)
PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE EXPANSION OF
THE ENCINA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY
(FROM 13.75 TO 18 MGD) AND UPGRADING TO SECON-
DARY TREATMENT, IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL
AND STATE LAWS.
BACKGROUND
Location and Description of Property
The subject property is located on the west side of 1-5, east
of the AT&SF railroad (between Poinsettia Lane and Palomar
Airport Road). The site is partially developed with the existing
Encina Facility, while much of the expansion area is currently
vacant. This vacant area has been subject to some earthwork in
the past, although native vegetation has revegetated much of
the site. This area has sloping sections which will be graded
(approximately 1000 cubic yards with some 2:1 slopes) in order
to allow development. Landscaping is proposed in order to screen
the treatment facility and revegetate the graded slopes. An
existing earthen flood control channel traverses the site. This
channel will be straightened and improved in order to provide
100-year flood protection. No improvement to the existing out-
fall pipe is proposed. The subject property is entirely fenced
off from adjacent properties.
Existing Zoning
Subject Property:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing Land Use
Subject Property:
North:
South:
East:
Southeast:
West:
PU
M
R-l-10,000
M, P-C
RD-M; R-l-10,000
Sewerage Treatment Facility
Industrial
Agricultural
Industrial; partially vacant
Residential (Alta Mira - approximately 500 feet)
Vacant
C
General Plan
The City's general plan designates the subject property for
public utility use. Therefore, the project is consistent with
this general plan designation.
Environmental Impact Information
An environmental impact report has been prepared for the proposed
project. This EIR was certified by the Vista Sanitation District
(Resolution No. 75-19). The Sanitation District made the follow-
ing findings pursuant to the subject EIR:
(a) The project will have a significant effect on the
environment.
(b) The major significant effects are as follows:
(1) Construction will have a short-range detri-
mental effect due to noise, dust and rerouting
of traffic; such effects can be mitigated by
use of proper construction techniques and
traffic control.
(2) The marine environment will be affected by a
volumetric increase in ocean discharge; such
effect will be mitigated by the fact that the
discharge will be of higher quality. ~
(3) Air quality will be indirectly affected due to
an increase capacity, even though the population
growth is not caused by the enlargement; such
effect can be mitigated by land use control
policies and pollution control policies by the
appropriate agencies.
(4) The project is indirectly growth inducing, as
it will accommodate, but not cause, population
growth; such effect is mitigated by the fact
that the increased capacity is smaller than
required for expected population growth and
need not be further expanded if population
growth does not take place as projected.
(5) The operation of the plant will increase the
noise level of the surrounding area; such effect
will be mitigated by the use of appropriate walls
and exhaust systems.
(6) The possibility of odors will increase; such
possibility will be mitigated by odor control
facilities constructed as part of the improved
treatment system.
-2-
It was found that the project will have a significant environmental
effect, however, the Sanitation District found two over-
riding considerations in approving the project:
(a) This project is needed to ensure compliance
with State and Federal regulations;
(b) The impacts can be successfully mitigated.
Although the subject EIR was certified almost 4 years ago
(June 19, 1975), the State EIR Guidelines state that a sub-
sequent EIR need not be prepared unless substantial changes in
the project or environment have occurred, or new, significant
information has been received. Since none of these situations
have occurred, the subject EIR is determined to be adequate
and a subsequent EIR need not be prepared.
As a responsible agency, the City of Carlsbad must review and
consider this EIR prior to acting upon the project.
Public Facilities
As previously noted, the project is necessary in order to comply
with State and Federal water quality control requirements. The
project is also necessary in order to provide adequate capacity
to meet projected increases in wastewater flow.
Secondary growth related impacts on other public facilities would
be addressed on a project-by-project basis. .
History and Related Cases
ZC-168, (Ordinance No. 9442), adopted by City Council on November
IT, 1975. This ordinance allowed a zone change on the subject
property from R-l-10,000 to P-U. This zone change assured
consistency of the existing sewage treatment facility with the
General Plan and the Zone Code.
ZCA-97, (Ordinance No. 9507), adopted by City Council on
September 5,1978).This ordinance amended Title 21, Chapter
21.32, Section 21.36.020 to clear ambiguities and allow waste-
water treatment, disposal, or reclamation facilities in the P-U
Zone.
Major Planning Considerations
1) Is the proposed expansion desirable in terms of City policy?
2) What significant environmental impacts (i.e, noise, visual
aethetics, odors) will result from the proposed project?
Can these impacts be sufficiently mitigated?
-3-
c
Discussion
The proposed project involves upgrading the Encina Sewage
Facility to secondary treatment and increasing its capacity from
13.75 mgd to 18.00 mgd. The upgraded facility will provide
additional service to the surrounding areas of Vista, Carlsbad,
San Marcos, Leucadia, Buena, and Encinitas. Carlsbad will
receive an approximately 25% share of the additional capacity.
Both the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments have established
stringent effluent quality requirements, and a schedule for
meeting these requirements. Included in these requirements is
the stipulation that the facility must be upgraded to secondary
treatment. (Secondary treatment consists of reducing both the
biochemical oxygen demand and the amount of suspended solids).
Therefore, a major objective of this project is to meet the
State and Federal requirements.
In order to increase the plants capacity and upgrade treatment,
new facilities must be constructed and some existing facilities
must be modified. New facilities include various operation
buildings, aeration and sedimentation tanks, and other necessary
appurtenances. The existing storm drainage channel which
bisects the site will be straightened and improved (concrete
lining, diking and culvert improvements) in order to accommodate
a 100 year flood. Other facilities must also be modified in
order to comply with the mandated guidelines. Effluent from
the facility will be discharged through the existing ocean outfall.
The sludge generated from the facility will be dewatered on site,
and transported in specially designed trucks to a land fill.
Within the EIR, two alternatives to the proposed secondary
treatment/ocean disposal project were discussed. These are the
"no action" and "groundwater recharge" alternatives. The no
action alternative involves the continuation of primary discharge
to the ocean, which would thereby violate State and Federal
requirements for minimum treatment levels. Groundwater recharge
involves upgrading the treatment plant to tertiary level before
distribution to three groundwater basins. This alternative was
found to be economically unfeasible and opposed by the Department
of Health due to the unknown long term effects on stable
organic compounds. It should be mentioned that within the
selected alternative, there was a choice among three secondary
treatment processes. The selected method, i.e. activated
sludge, is most desirable in terms of monitary costs, and in
reducing potential odor and visual impacts.
Through the certification of the EIR, the Vista Sanitation
District requested agencies with appropriate regulatory powers
within the subject area to impose regulations that mitigate
significant environmental impacts. The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB),
California Coastal Commission, and State Department of Fish and
Game have conditionally approved the project. The conditions
-4-
~ c Oc
imposed by these agencies deal primarily with secondary growth
related impacts by regulating the timing of plant expansion and
the areas to be provided with sewer services. Specifically,
the Coastal Commission has designated agricultural and steep
sloped areas where sewer service can be extended only if it is
in conformance with the certified Local Coastal Program. Also,
the conditions imposed by the EPA and SWRCB coordinate expansion
of the facility with the implementation schedule of the Regional
Air Quality Strategy (RAQS).
Since the project has been approved by the affected State and
Federal Agencies; staff believes that it is important for the
Commission to direct its attention at establishing conditions
which will mitigate any significant impacts on the surrounding
area and ensure the project's compatibility with City policies.
Potential significant impacts from the project include: noise
impacts from construction and plant operation; odor impacts; and
visual aesthetic impacts. The EIR lists specific measures, such
as the treatment of influent, odor removal towers, covering and
ventilating certain facilities to reduce odors, and other
screening/buffering methods, which would mitigate these impacts.
These mitigation measures have been incorporated into the
project, either by the applicant or through conditions of
approval.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a rec-
ommendation or APPROVAL of Precise Development Plan -1 to
the City Council, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
1) The Precise Development Plan ensures the compatibility of
the project with the City's General Plan for the following
reasons:
a) The General Plan Land Use Element designates the subject
property for a public utility use.
b) The project is consistent with the goal and policy of
the public facilities element of the General Plan.
2) The proposed Precise Development Plan ensures the compatibility
of the development with surrounding development for the
following reasons:
a) Conditions are imposed as part of this approval that
mitigate any significant impacts resulting from the
project.
b) The development is located in a depressed area that
can easily be buffered in order to prevent adverse
impacts to adjacent properties.
-5-
t (
3) The proposed project conforms to the California Environmental
Quality Act, and the Carlsbad Environmental Protection
Ordinance since:
a) An EIR has been prepared and certified by the lead
agency.
b) Although it was found that the project may have
significant adverse environmental impacts, said lead
agency has found overriding considerations justifying
approval of the project.
c) Adequate measures to mitigate significant impacts are
included as part of the required approvals.
d) The City acting as a responsible agency has considered
this EIR in approving the project.
e) Other environmental agencies have conditionally approved
the project.
4) The proposed Precise Development Plan provides for necessary
public improvements as necessitated by the development since
conditions are imposed which require such improvements.
Conditions
1) Development of the site shall occur as shown on Exhibits
A and B dated 4/11/79, and Exhibit D dated 4/9/79; except
for modifications that are contained herein, and minor
modifications approved by the Public Works Administrator.
2) In addition to the approval of the development indicated
in the Exhibits noted in Condition No. 1, all other
requirements listed in this approval shall be indicated on
the final Precise Development Plan.
3) Grading plans shall be approved by the Public Works
Administrator or his designee, prior to the issuance of a
building permit. Said plans shall include provisions to
limit grading to the minimum area necessary for construction
of the facilities.
4) Surfaces shall be graded to direct runoff toward designed
drainage facilities and away from cut and fill slopes.
5) Land shall not be cleared of vegetation except immediately
before grading, and all slopes shall be established for
erosion control immediately upon completion of such grading.
Native vegetation shall be retained wherever feasible.
j6) Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for the
entire facility and subject to the approval of the Planning
Director. The landscaping shall be designed to screen
facilities from views along 1-5, and surrounding properties.
Plans shall include fast growing tall trees, as well as a
combination of shrubs and ground cover. Plants shall be
drought tolerant to the maximum extent feasible, and fire
-6-
c c : c
retardent where necessary. Said landscape and irrigation
shall be installed immediately upon completion of construction,
except that all screening landscaping shall be installed
upon completion of grading, prior to any construction.
7) All noise producing mechanisms and facilities shall be
shielded and buffered in such a manner so as to reduce the
noise level to a maximum of 65 dba, from the property line
of the facility, in accordance with the noise element of
the General Plan.
8) All influent wastewater shall be pre-treated in order to
remove odors. In addition, the screening structures, grit
removal tanks, primary sedimentation tanks, and all open
channels, including primary effluent channels, shall be
covered and ventilated in order to remove odors.
9) Odor removal towers are required and shall be delineated
on the final Precise Development Plan subject to the
approval of the Public Works Administrator.
10) Fire hydrants shall be placed on the site as required and
approved by the Fire Marshall.
11) All necessary public improvements shall be installed subject
to the approval of the City Engineer. Said improvements
shall include the extension of the existing 10" water line
along Avenida Encinas, from the northerly boundary of the
treatment facility to its southerly boundary.. -
12) All storm drain.and channel designs shall be subject to
the approval of the City Engineer.
13) The placement of equipment on any roof tops shall be screened
from views, and subject to the approval of the Planning
Director.
14) All lighting shall be designed in a manner that will not
adversely affect nearby residences or public roadways.
A lighting plan shall be subject to the approval of the
Planning Director.
15) Upon approval, the applicant shall submit a reproducible
copy of the Precise Development Plan which incorporates all
requirements of the approval to the City Manager for
signature. Prior to signing the final Precise Development
plan, the City Manager shall determine that all applicable
requirements have been incorporated into the plan and that
all conditions of approval have been satisfactorily met or
otherwise guaranteed. The final signed Precise Development
Plan shall be the official site layout plan for the
property and shall be attached to any application for a
building permit on the subject property.
-7-
BMrar
4/20/79
V
PDP-l
ENC1NA
CASE NO.Date Rec'd DCC Date: -4M/23_PC Date
Description of Request:WATF=Px P/3UUJnOM
Address or Location of Request
AMO
Applicant:
Engr. or Arch.
Brief Legal: A.A/-IJ TV\g.
MAP
!School District:
Assessor Book:_
General Plan Land Use Description:
Existing Zone: p?—}J
Acres:No.'of Lots
^Proposed Zone:
•2 ?
P-U
i v;ater District: <TP/Sanitation District:
i Coast Permit Area:
ITHE
— Property Management & Real Estate Sales
April 30, 1979
City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Council Members:
As president of the management agent for the Altamira Homeowners
Association, I am writing in concern to the proposed expansion of the
Encina Sewer Plant. It is the general consensus of these 672 homeowners
that no expansion of this facility should take place until the odor
problem is eliminated.
It is hoped that each member of the council will take the time
to visit Altamira before addressing this issue on May 15.
Very truly yours,
MEPrejv
P.O. BOX 1068 • 2122 EL CAMINO REAL • OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92054
TELEPHONES: SALES 433-0271; MANAGEMENT (714) 433-0917; LA JOLLA 452-8263 REALTOR