HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-09-18; City Council; 5998; 2nd phase allocation system.* l-l-. , . - -. . .. - . . . . .- .1 ..
CITY OF CMLSBAC
AGENDA BILL NO:
INITIAL
Dept. Hd. SSSP
DATE : September 48, -1,979 City Atty.
b
DEPARTMENT : Planning City Mgr.
SUBJECT':
SECOND PHASE ALLOCATION SYSTEM
STATEI@NT OF THE MATTER:
The City Council considered the attached Second Phase Sewer Allocation System at their workshop session of Tuesday, September 11, 1979. At
that time the Council requested an additional tie breakkr be added to
the point system for all cases. The tie breaker concerns
System. projects which were accepted and rated in the First Phase
In addition it will be necessary for the City Council to establish a deadline for accepting applications, approximately 30 days from tonight's meeting. Staff recommends Friday, October 19, 1979 at 5:OO P.M. as the deadline for receiving applications.
Your staff will notify all persons who have written the City. concerning sewer availability since the original moratorium was adopted during
April df 1977:
Exhibits
City Council Resolution No. 593.3 Second Phase Sewer Allocation System, dated September 7, 1979
RECOMMENDATION
.If City Council concurs with the Second Phase Sewer Allocation System as contained herein, you should adopt City Council Resolution No.JYJ3
Council Action:
. 9-18-79 Council adopted'Resolution 5933, authorizing the issuance of sewer
connections permits pursuant to the Second Phase Sewer Allocation
System, subject to changing Page 2 and Exhibit F.2 in accordance with
the staff memo dated September 18, 1979, change on page 2 which would1
indicate projects in Redevelopment area would not be accepted until Plan is adopted, and a further system will be adopted for said area, Exhibit 6.2 to include motels and taxable sales per amount of
transient occupancy tax, and inserting October 19, 1979 in blank on
page 5.
FOP34 - PLANNING 79
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 5933
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER
CONNECTIONS PERMITS PURSUANT TO THE
SECOND PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.05.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
imposes a moratorium on the issuance of sewer permits and
building permits due to the lack of sewer treatment capacity; and
WHEREAS, said Chapter authorizes the City Council to adopt
an allocation system, which provides for the issuance of a
limited number of sewer and building permits as an exception to
said moratorium; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to adopt a fair and
equitable system for allocating any additional sewage treatment
capacity which may become available in the future, pursuant to
the authority of Section 18.05.030 of the Carlsbad F4unicipal Code;
and
WHEREAS, a Council Committee has worked for many weeks in
an effort to devise a fair and just system to allocate any future
capacity, and has produced a Second Phase Sewer Allocation
System; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director has determined that said
system will have a nonsignificant impact on the environment and
a Negative Declaration has been prepared and filed.
Council has considered said Negative Declaration and finds that
the requirements of the City of Carlsbad Environmental Quality
Act have been satisfied in regards to said system: and
The City
//
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, a noticed public hearing has been held on the
system and after full and complete consideration, the City Council
has determined it to be in the public interest to adopt a system
which can be used for a second phase allocation of additional
sewage treatment capacity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That pursuant to the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18-05.03
the City Council hereby adopts the Second Phase Sewer Allocation
System as set out in Exhibit "X", dated September 7, 1979,
attached hereto and made a part hereof,
3. It is the intent of the Council in adopting said system
to adopt a framework which can be used to fairly and equitably
allocate some or all of the additional sewer capacity which the
City may acquire. In adopting this system, the City Council
does not obligate itself to allocate all or any part of the
available capacity pursuant thereto. Prior to approval of the
Second Phase Sewer Allocation Permits, the Council may find it
necessary to further amend the allocation system, The system is
subject to change and may or may not be used in the future if
additional amounts of sewer capacity becomes available.
4, As a part of the Second Phase System, the City Council
has provided special rules which apply to building permits
issued pursuant to the sewer allocations made under this system.
Those rules provide that building permits must be taken out
promptly and processed diligently to conclusion or they will be
void. In so doing, the Council has deviated from the provisions
.2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
12
14
15
1E
17
1€
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
of the Uniform Building Code. This action is
unique local circumstances resulting from the
sewer moratorium. In order to insure that th
necessitated by the
City's building and
available amount
of sewer capacity is utilized in the best interest of all the
citizens of Carlsbad, the Council wishes to insure that sewer
permits, when issued, will be used as soon as possible and will
not be stockpiled thereby denying other, perhaps more worthy,
projects an opportunity to proceed. The Director of Building
and Housing is hereby directed to file a copy of this Resolution
with the State as necessary to justify the deviation from the
Uniform Building Code necessitated by special local conditions.
5. The City Council has determined that it is necessary to
collect a special fee as a condition of the issuance of a sewer
allocation permit application to the Second Phase Allocation
System. The fee will be in addition to all other fees required
for the issuance of building and sewer permits.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the 18th day of September
1979 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Councilmen Skotnicki, Anear, Lewis and
NOES : None Councilwoman Casler
ABSENT: Councilman Packard
ANTHaY J . S KOTN I C-KI , -Vi ce-Mayoi
ATTEST :
L
r CITY OF CARLSBAD
SECOND PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION SYSTEM
EXHIBIT X
I. Objectives
The sewer allocation system contained herein is intended to provide
a framework within which the City Council can make some judgments
regarding the allocation of a limited amount of sewer capacity which
may become available. This system is designed to meet the following City objectives:
A. To fairly and equitably allocate a limited amount of sewer
capacity among competing demands.
B. To coordinate development with needed public improvements.
C. To maintain and enhance levels of City services (infilling).
D. To preserve and/or enhance the efficiency of service delivery
systems to allow time to provide public facilities adequate
to meet expanded service needs.
E. To renew and maintain existing urban areas.
F. To accommodate reasonable amounts of development of vacant
land within existing urban areas.
I. i
11. Available Sewer Capacity:
It is estimated that the second phase sewer allocation-system will have 1,000 equivalent dwelling units and 246,000 gallons of sewer treatment capacity to be considered for allocation, This capacity may be distributed on the basis of the criteria contained
within this document, The amount of sewer capacity required for any particular project shall be determined pursuant to Section
13.08.081 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
111. Purpose and Intent
A. The guiding criteria for the application and interpretation of this system shall be to maximize the overall community benefits for the City of Carlsbad.
B. This sewer allocation system is for those portions of the City of Carlsbad which are located within the Carlsbad sewer service
area.
9/79
,
IV. Land Use Distribution: --,-.,.-
The following distribution of sewer capacity by land use cate- gory is established for the second phase sewer allocation system,
Percentage to be applied Actual
to available EDU's EDU ' s
A. Industrial
1. Expansion of existing
business
2. New uses
B. Commercial Land Use 1. General
2. Office
15%
15%
15%
10%
C. Single Family Residential
Land Use (residential density of 7500 sq. ft.. or land per unit or less) 1. Small projects - 4 or
2. Projects of more than less units 10%
4 units 10%
D. Multiple Family Residential
Land Use (residential density of greater than
unit) 10%
I 7500 sq. ft. of land per
E. Cormunity facilities 5%.
(parks, schools, governmental . I . buildings, churches, hospitals
and airports)
F. Contingency 2% (failing septic tanks, commu- nity development rehabilita-
tion programs, capital
improvement programs,
other exceptions to sewer
moratorium contained in
Section 18.04,170 of Carlsbad Municipal Code)
G. Projects in the Redevelopment area 8% 1. No applications will be
accepted until a plan is adopted for the
Village Redevelopment
Project Area.
-2-
SI 150
150 '
150 .
100
100
100
100
50
..
20
80
9/79
'2.
3.
f
After adoption of the plan
applications for the initial allocation will
be accepted only from the
"core area" (Exhibit A)
for a period of 6 months. At the end of the 6 month
period, the Village Redevelop-
ment Project Area Committee will
be asked for recommendations re-
garding opening applications to the entire project area (Exhibit B).
Applications for sewer permits will be divided by use in accordance with the above categories and applicant is limited to one category for any one project. Projects in each category will be rated against other projects in the same category and seperate allocations
will be made within each category.
The Community Facilities and Contingency categories are designed
to reserve sewer capacity rather than allocating fixed amounts immediately as the other land use categories. It is anticipated
that between now and when optimum sewer capacity is available, there will be a continuous need for capacity in the various land
uses identified in these categories. It may be necessary to
establish a separate allocation system for these categories if a high demand occurs; however, at thjs time, it is anticipated that these will be handled on an "as needed" basis by a case-by-case evaluation by the City Council. The only exception to the City
Council allocating these categories based on community need and
the public welfare, is that the City Manager shall have authority to issue sewer connection permits for failing septic tank systems,
V. Procedures for Applying for Sewer Permits Under the Second
Phase Allocation System
It is assumed that there will be more applications for sewer
allocations than there is available capacity. Therefore, five
qualifications are established which must be satisfied at the time
of application in order for the application to be considered.
It is the judgment of the City Council that only projects which can meet these qualifications should be eligible to participate in the allocation under the second sewer allocation. These qualifications are also intended to screen applications in a pre- liminary way to provide a reasonable guide to save unnecessary engineering and design costs for a proposed project where there is little chance of the praject qualifying for a sewer allocation permit, The qualifications are as follows:
1. To be eligible residential projects must be within the infill area as shown on map marked Exhibit C, attached hereto, or be found to be a logical extension
-3-
9/79
2.
3.
4.
5.
of developed areas located outside the infill area and must be proposed for development in a manner similar to the developed areas to which they are
adjacent,
No existing projects with septic tanks, may apply
for sewer under the allocation system.
The project shall be on property where all required public facilities are existing or can be satisfied by
City Council Policy Number 17. In no case will a
project create a need for public costs for City facilities
to service the site such as streets, sewers, etc.
Applications for a project under this system shall be limited as follows:
Commercial Office, 10 EDUs
Commercial General, 20 EDUs Residential, 35 EDUs
The City Manager may authorize the acceptance and pro-
cessing of applications which exceed the limits by no
more than 10% upon a determination that it is necessary
to avoid undue problems to the project in the areas of
engineering or construction. Individual financing arrange- ments shall not be considered.
Application will not be accepted for projects within-the
area covered by the settlement in the Grove litigation.
No allocation in excess of these limits stated in qualification number four will be made to any one project. For land use categories without
limits the Council may defer allocation if one or more applicant seeks a disproportionate share of the available capacity. In that event the Council may revise this system or otherwise proceed as they
consider appropriate.
Applicants for projects which apparently qualify under the cate-
gories listed above, shall then prepare the following information as the official application for a second phase sewer allocation
I permit.
1. Documents Reauired for Submittal:
The following documents are required to provide suffi- cient information to accurately rate the application, and to determine if the proposal meets Code requirements, Errors or omissions may cause disqualification.
a) Application, (Exhibit D)
b) Questionnaires for qualification. (Exhibit E)
-4-
9/79
j
i i
I
t r
i
i I
! t
I
i I I
r
i
I r i i 1
i I i
c) Locat Jn map of project site sho,.ng existing
< public facilities, or a letter indicating the
I degree of completion of the project.
d) Application Fees: The submittal of a processing fee in the amount of:
$25.00 for community facilities $25.00 for single family residence $50.00 for multiple family residence $50.00 for commercial or industrial uses.
The deadline for filing applications is the close of the business - -- day on . Applications shall be filed with the Planning Department. Applications may not be made for the contingency or redevelopment categories as a part of the initial allocation under the second phase system.
VI. Staff Evaluation
After the closing date for receipt of applications a staff com- mittee consisting of the Public Works Administrator, City Engineer,
Director of Building and Housing and the Director of Planning,
shall evaluate each application in accordance with the provisions
of this section. The cornhittee shall prepare a report for the City Council. The report shall show which projects in the judg-
ment of the committee meet the qualifications of Section V. The
project shall be placed within the’appropriate land use categories.
If applications in any category exceed the capacity available to that category, they shall be evaluated and ranked by staff
based on the point system as set out in the point rating system attached hereto as Exhibit F, G, H and made a part hereof.
The report shall also show a point total for each project and a priority list of projects from the one with the highest total to
the one with the lowest total for each land use category. Finally
the report shall recommend which projects in each category should receive a sewer allocation permit.
The report of the staff committee shall be mailed or otherwise made available to all applicants prior to the City Council hearing,
VII. City Council Action
The City Clerk shall set a public hearing before the City Council
to consider the staff committee report. After completion of the
public hearing on the report, the Council shall first consider and resolve any disagreenrents between applicants and staff in regard to the qualifications of Section V. The Council shall then eliminate from further consideration for permits under this second phase allocation all projects which do not meet the Section
V qualifications,
-5-
9 f79
I A
The. Council shall rtview the recommendations OL the Staff Repor,t in regards to the point ranking of qualifying projects
within each land use category.
prerogative of making its own policy interpretations of the rating
system in reaching its decision on allocations. If the Council
is not satisfied that the results of the rating system meet the
objectives and purposes and intent of the system, the Council may amend it as they consider necessary in the public interest. When
the Council is satisfied with the findings and the ranking of the
projects, they shall adopt a list of such projects which shall become the basis for issuing sewer permits and building permits within the Carlsbad sewer service boundaries. Inclusion of a
project on the approved list shall constitute authorization pur-
suant to Municipal Code Sections 18.05.030 and 21.49.030 for the
exception of that project from the building and planning moratoria
imposed by Chapters 18.05 and 21.49 of the Code.
The Council shall have the
The Council is under no obligation to allocate all or any part of
the available sewer capacity pursuant to this system. The Council
may use unallocated capacity within a subcategory for another use
within the same general category or may move capacity from cate- gory to category. The Council reserves the right to establish a
cut-off within each land use category as they consider necessary
in order to ensure the available capacity is used in the best interests of the citizens. of Carlsbad. Any capacity which is not allocated as a part of this second phase or which is allocated but not used, shall remain in reserve to be reallocated as the Council may determine.
VIII. Permits and Fees
The successful applicant within the allocation system shall be
required to perform in the following manner in order to obtain
and retain a sewer permit:
A. For property requiring discretionary permits, i.e.? tenta-
tive tract map, PUD, condo permit, variance, CUP, etc.,
application for such permit shall be filed within sixty
days from City Council action approving the list of projects
eligible for sewer allocation. The applicant must dili-
gently pursue his permits to a final decision.
B. Application for building permit must be filed within forty-five days after Council action approving the list of eligible
projects for those projects not requiring further discre-
tionary permits, or within sixty days after final City action on the discretionary permit. pursue his permits to a final decision. The City Council may extend the time for building permit applications an additional sixty days for major projects. If the applicant cannot meet these deadlines, he should so indicate on the application for a sewer permit.
The applicant must diligently
-6-
9/79
. c.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Conc,urrently with the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall obtain a sewer connection and pay the
required fee. Applicant shall also pay a Public Facility
fee as may be adopted by the City Council.
The applicant must take out his building, sewer and other
necessary permits within 20 days after mailing of written
notice by the City that plan check for the building permit
is complete and that the building permit is ready for
issuance.
shall be made within such time limits as the City Manager
may establish.
After issuance of a sewer permit by the Engineering Depart-
ment, construction shall commence within 120 days and be
diligently pursued without interruption until completed. If construction does not progress in a reasonably timely way, or is interrupted for any period in excess of 120 days the building permit and sewer permit will be void. All fees shall be non-refundable.
If revisions to the plans are required they
*.
If a building permit is voided, application for a new building
permit may be made which will only be issued if the project
qualifies for a new sewer allocation pursuant to such system that the Council may adopt in the future.
Sewer permits shall not be transferred to another project.
Failure to comply with these requirements will void the allocation,
NOTE TO APPLICANTS
This second phase sewer allocation system is adopted based on an assumption that the City will have available some additional sewer capacity. This assumption is based on engineers' estimates
and the resolution of litigation. The true facts are difficult
to determine, the assumptions which underlie the system are sub- ject to change, and the litigation settlement may not be finally
concluded.
There is no guarantee that a project, which apparently qualifies for an allocation pursuant to this system, will actually receive a sewer permit. Further, there is no guarantee that the issuance of a sewer allocation permit will ensure that capacity will in fact be available at the time of building permit or occupancy.
Sewer which is available when an applicant applies for discre-
tionary approval may not be available when application is made
for building permit. in the plant, and must be governed by the City Councils' deter- mination of availability of capacity at the time the hookup is made. The fact that an allocation is made for a project requir- ing discretionary approvals shall have no effect on the City's consideration of such approvals. If the approvals are not given within the time limits of this section the allocation shall be
The City may not exceed its capacity rights
-7-
9/79
ziutomatica1I.y revoked and the capacity shall be available for reallocation as the Council may determine.
Except for events beyond the control of the City Council, it is
the policy of the City Council that an allocation made to an applicant who complies with the requirements of the Second Phase Sewer Allocation System and all other applicable laws and ordinances
will not be rescinded or reallocated to another person.
In addition to the above, the second phase sewer allocation
system shall include the following:
Exhibit A - Redevelopment - Core Area
Exhibit B - Redevelopment - Project Area Exhibit C - Infill Map Exhibit D - Application for Sewer Allocation Permit Exhibit E - Questionnaire for Application Qualifications
Exhibit F - Point System, Residential
Exhibit G - Point System, Commercial
Exhibit H -. Point System, Industrial Exhibit G-I - Building Department Valuation Tables
JCH :ms
7/11/79
Revised
7/13/79
Revised 8/21/7 9
Revised
9/7/79 -8-
9/79
!
I
EXHIBIT C
PAC1 F I C
................ ................ ................................ ................................ 1-1 ................ ................................ ................ INFlLbJ3~
9/79
EXHIBIT D
'APPLICATION FOR SEWER APPLICATION PERMIT #
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) DATE
1. Description of Project .(Residential, Commercial, Industrial . .
No. of units, etc.) :
I If
2. Location of Project: The subject property is generally located
on the side of between
and
3.
' Book
4.
Assessor's Number: Book Page Parcels
Page Parcels (use back of page if
necessary)
Owner (s) :
Name Address City State Zip Phone
U
5. Applicant:
Name Address City State Zip Phone
Representing (Company or Corp.)
I hereby declare that all information contained within this application UNDERSTOOD, ABILITY .
and the
WD EAS
accompanying attachments have been READ, BEEN ANSWERED CORRICTLY TO THE BEST OF MY
Applicant's Signature
9.179
- - QU'-'IONNAIRE FOR APPLICATION QUAL1 :ATIONS ExHlBIT E
The following questions must be answered concerning your project:
1. Is the location of your.project inside the infill boundaries as approved by Counci 1 ?
2. If not in the infill area, what existing development is your project adjacent to?
Approximate distance between the adjacent development and your project.
What previous approvals has the City granted for the project or site? 3.
Date of any such approval
4. Will your project require further discretionary permits?
If so, what are those permits?
Is there a septic system presently serving or approved for the project or site? 5.
6.
7.
8.
How many dwelling units are proposed or how many equivalent dwelling units are required?
How many jobs will be created by the implementation of this project?
Have earlier phases of the project been approved? Degree of completion of earlier phases
9. Will the project create any public costs for City facilities such as streets, sewers, etc.?
10. Did this project qualify for rating under the First Phase Sewer Allocation System?
To the best of my knowledge my proposed project will not require any public costs for City facilities to service the site, such as streets, sewers, etc. I understand that if it is determined by City staff that my project will require such public costs, my application will be disqualified from consideration and my application fees will not be refunded.
I hereby certify that if an allocation is made, I am ready and able to pursue the project to completion in accordance with the time limits of the second phase system.
I agree to pay as a condition of receiving a sewer connection permit and in addition to all other fees, a public facilities fee in an amount to be determined by the City Counci 7.
LOG NO. Applicant's Signature 9/79
EXHIBIT F - -
.I
SECOND PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION
POINT SYSTEM - RESIDENTIAL
1. Fire Response Time - ba'sed upon Planning Department Map PS-1.
Time Points -
Over 4 minutes
3.1 to 4.0 minutes 2.1 to 3.0 minutes
1.1 to 2.0 minutes
0 to 1 minute
2. Distance to schools - based upon Planning Department Map PS-2.
Location Points
3/8 mile + % to 3/8 mile
1/8 to % mile
0 to 1/8 mile
0
1
2
3
3. Distance to public transportation routes - based on
Planning Department Map PS-3.
Distance Points
% mile +
3/8 to % mile % to 3/8 mile
1/8 to 4 mile
0 to 1/8 mile
4. Location within the Community - Planning Department Map PS-4.
Location Points
Non-residential reserve in General Plan area 0
All other 5
Infill area, not within Redevelopment study area 10
5, Completion of Public Facilities
Facility Points
None 0 Upgrade system in area other than complying
General Plan designated system 6 with City's Public Improvement Ordinance 3
Capital Improvement Project 10
9/79
t
.6. Proximity to Parks 6, Public Recreational Areas - Planning
Department Map PS-5.
Location
3/8 mile + k to 3/8 mile
1/8 to k mile
0 to 1/8 mile
7. Distance to markets - Planning Department PS-6.
Distance
1 mile +
3/4 to 1 mile 4 to 3/4 mile % to + mile
0 to % mile
Points
0
1
2
3
Points
8. Sewer Use - based on a negative point system which responds to the amount of sewer each project requests in the land use category. i.e. the greater number of edu's requested, the greater the negative points.
For small projects with four or less units:
200 X (requested number EDU'S) = Negative points to
100 be subtracted from
total points accumulated.
Single family homes will
be exempt from negative points.
(Range 0 to -8)
For projects of more than four units:
25 X (requested number EDU'S) = Negative points to be
100 subtracted from total points accumulated.
(Range 1.25 to 8.75)
Tie Breakers - The two tie breakers established below have been designed
to be considered in the event of a tie in the point structure of projects within the same category, and will be considered in order of their listing.
If the first tie breaker consideration does not effectively resolve the
tie, the second consideration will be utilized.
1. Those projects accepted and rated in the First Phase Sewer Allocation
System will receive priority over other projects.
2. Priority €or projects will be established in accordance with the
earliest date of a City approval. granted for the project, that project with the earliest chronological
application date for sewer will receive top priority.
If no City approval has been
.2 9/7 9
SECOND PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION
POINT SYSTEM - COMMERCIAL
EXHIBIT G
1. Fire Response Time - based on Planning Department Map PS-1.
Time Points
No access Over 6 minutes
5 to 6 minutes
4 to 5 minutes 3 to 4 minutes
2 to 3 minutes 1 to 2 minutes
0 to 1 minutes
2. Distance to Public Transportation Routes - Planning Department Map PS-3.
Distance Points
% mile +
3/8 to % mile % to 3/8 mile
1/8 to % mile
0 to 1/8 mile
-. 3. Completion of Public Facilities
Facility Points
None I 0
Upgrade system in area, other than complying with City's Public Improvement Ordinance 3
General Plan designated 6
Capital Improvement Project 10
4. Taxible Sales Potential to the City (Does not apply to office commercial)
Quartile Points
Bottom 25% of projects Third 25% of projects Second 25% of projects
Top 25% of projects
0 6
12
18
Method: Projects shall be arrayed from highest to lowest potential taxable sales. Potential taxable sales for each project shall be computed by multiplying the square footage of gross leasible building area in each project by the
following factors:
9/79
Use Taxable Sales per Sq. Foot -
Regional shopping center
Community & Neighborhood Commercial center
Specialty store Discount store
Furnitire and appliances
Furnishings
T.V., Stereo, Records Building supplies Paint and wallpaper Auto service and supplies
Dinner restaurant
Coffee shop Fast food Mini-supermarket Car dealership - set amount'of
SOURCE - CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT
5. Building Valuation of property
Quart i le
90
60
100 80
60
60
120
90 120
80 140
120 250 40 $1.8 million
Points
Bottom 25% of projects 0
Third 25% of projects 3
Top 25% of projects 9
Second 25% of projects 6
Method: Projects shall be arrayed from highest to
lowest building valuations. Building valuation for each
Project shall be computed multiplying the square footage
of building area in each project by the appropriate construction cost factors set forth in the Building Department Valuation Tables attached to questionnaire.
(See Exhibit G-I)
6. Sewer Use - based on a negative point system which responds
to the amount of sewer each project requests in the land use
category. i.e. the greater number of edu's requested, the greater the negative points.
50 X (Requested number of EDU's) = 100
Office Commercial
50 X (Xequested number of EDU's) =
150
General Commercial
Negative points to be subtracted from total points accumulated.
(Off ice Range -.5 to -5)
Negative points to be subtracted from total points accumulated.
(General. Range
-.5 to -6.67)
.2
9/79
T>ie’ Bredkers
The two tie breakers listed below have been designed to be considered in the event of a tie in the point structure of projects within the same category, and will be considered in order of their listing. If the first tie breaker consideration does not effectively resolve the
tie, the second consideration will be utilized.
1, Those projects accepted and rated in the First Phase Sewer Allocation System will receive priority over other projects.
2. Priority for projects will be established in accordance with the
earliest date of a City approval. If no City approval has been
granted for the project, that project with the earliest chronological
application date for sewer will receive top priority.
Attachment - Exhibit G-I
.3
BANKS:
Type I or I1 F.R. Type 111-1 Hour Type 111-N
Type V-1 Hour Type V-N
HOTELS & MOTELS:
Type I or II F.R.
Type 111-1 Hour
Type 111-N Type V-1 Hour Type V-N
. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS:
Type I or 11 F.R. Type 11-1 Hour
Type 111-1 Hour
Ti 7 t-Up
Type V-1 Hour
Type V-N
Type II-(Stock)
1 Type 111-N
-- EXHIBIT G-I -
1979-1980
. Proposed
. 'Va.1 U.e/Sg. Ft .
864.00 54.00
52.00 46.00 44.00
47.00 40.00 37.00
35.00
. 33.00
MEDICAL OFFICES:
Type I or 11 F.R. Type 111-1 Hour
Type rIr-ri
Type V-1,Hour
Type V-14
OFFICES:
Type I or II F.R.
Type III-? Hour
Type 111-N
Type V-1 Hour
Type V-N
29.00
18.00
16.00 21 .oo 19.00 -< 14.00
78.00
16.00
58.00 44.00 42.00
39.00 37.00
51 -00 38.00
35.00 31 .OO
29.00
L
9/79
RESTAURANTS :
Type 111-1 Hour
Type 111-N Type V-1 Hour
Type V-N
-
1979-1980 Proposed
. 'Val ue/Sq .Ft-
$46-00
44-00 40- 00 38.00
SERVICE STATIONS:
Type 11-N Type 111-1 Hour
Type V-1 Hour
Canopies
\ 36.00 39.00 25.00 12.00
STORES :
Type I or I1 F.R.
Type 111-1 Hour
Type V-1 Hour Type V-N
t . Type 111-N
THEATRES :
Type I or I1 F.R.
Type 111-1 Hour
Type 111-FI Type V-1 Hour
Type V-N
WAREHOUSES:
Type I or TI F.R. Type 11 or V-7 Hour
Type I1 or V-N
Type 111-7 Hour
Type 111-N
39-00
29-00 27.00 z 26.00
23.00
54-00 40.00 38.00 37.00
35-00
24-00 16-00 14.00 18.00
16.00
.2
9/79
EXHIBIT €I
t
1.
2.
SECOND PHASE SEWER ALLOCATION
POINT SYSTEM - INDUSTRIAL
Fire Response Time - based on Planning Department Map PS-1,
Time Points
No Access
Over 6 minutes
5 to 6 minutes
4 to 5 minutes
3 to 4 minutes
2 to 3 minutes
1 to 2 minutes o to 1 minutes
Distance to public transportation routes - based on
Planning Department Map PS-3.
Distance
% mile +
3/8 to % mile % to 3/8 mile
1/8 to % mile
0 to 1/8 mile
3. Completion of Public Facilities
Faz'ility
Points
0 1
2
3
4
-,
Points
None 0 Upgrade system in area, other than complying
General Plan designated system 6
with City's Public Improvement Ordinance 3
Capital Improvement Project 10
4. Employment Opportunities
Number of Positions
1-5 6 - 10 1G - 30
30 - 100
100 or more
Points
1 3
6
10
15
9/79
5. Market Value of property
Quartile
Bottom 25% of projects Third 25% of projects Second 25% of projects Top 25% of projects
Points
0
3
6
9
Method: Projects shall be arrayed from highest to
lowest building valuations.
project shall be computed by multiplying the square footage
of the building area in each project by the appropriate
construction cost factors set forth in the Building Depart- ment Valuation Tables attached to questionnaire.
Sewer Use - based on a negative point system which responds
to the amount of sewer each project requests in the land use
category. i.e. the greater number of edu's requested, the
greater the negative points.
Building valuation for each
6.
50 X (Requested number EDU'S) = Negative points to be
150 subtracted from total
points accumulated.
Tie Breakers
(Industrial Range -.3 to -50) ."..
The two tie breakers established below have been designed to be considered in the event of a tie in the point structure of projects within the same category, and will be considered in
order of their listing. If the first tie breaker consideration does not effectively resolve the tie, the second will be
utilized.
1. Those projects accepted and rated in the First Phase
Sewer Allocation System will receive priority over other projects.
2. Priority for projects will be established in accordance with
the earliest date of a City approval. has been granted for the project, that project with the
earliest chronological application date for sewer will receive
top priority.
If no City approval
Attachment
9/79
DATE : Septe&er 18, 19 7 9
TO: * City Council
FRO14 : Plamning Department
SUBJECT: CHANGES TO PROPOSED SECOND PHASE SEWER ALLGCATIOM SYSTEM
Attached please find revised page -2- of the Second Phase Sewer
Allocation System, (Exhibit X) , and revised page .2 of Exhibit E',
Point System - Residential.
Ki.ndly insert these corrected pages into the previously distri.buted
SecoiId Phase Sewer Allocation packet. Thank you.
, IV, $ar,d. Use 'Dj-strilxtion:
l-l---ll-----_ _- -----
Tf.15 foll-owing distribction of sewer capacity by land use cate-
CJG'L-~ is established for the second phase sewer allocation system.
Percentage to be applied Actual
- - ~I EDU ' s to available EDiT"s
a.
B.
C.
D'.
E.
F. ,
G.
Industrial
1. Expansion of existing
business 15%
2. New uses 15%
Commercial Land Use
1. General
2. Office
15%
10%
150
150
150
100
Single Family Residential
Land Use (residential. less than one dwelling unit per 7500 density of 7500 sq. ft. or square feet of land area) land per unit or less) 1. Small projects - 4 or less units 10% 100 2. Projects of more than
4 units 10% 100
(Residential density equal- to or
Mu1tiPI-e Family Residential (Residential density greater than
Land Use (residential one dwelling unit per 7503 square density of greater than feet of land area) 7500 sq. ft. of land per unit) 10% 100
50 Community facilities 5% 8 20
(parks, schoals, governmental buildings, churches, hospitals and airports) P Contingency 2% (failing septic tanks, commu-
nity development rehabilita-
tion programs, capital improvement programs, other exceptions to sewer moratorium contained in Section 18.04.170 of Carlsbad Municipal Code)
'. .,;/i
D
Projects in the Redevelopment area 8%
1; No applications will be
accepted until a plan is adopted for the
Village Redevelopment
Project Area.
GO
-2-
9/79
Lccation
3/8 mile -+
% to 3/8 mile
S/8 tc $6 mile
0 to. 1/G mile
A___-- ,
7 Distance to markets - .Planning D~~ZY'CRCI~~ PS-6
I'oi.nts
.1 mile i- 0 3/4 to 1 mile % to 3/4 mile % to + rnile
0 to k mile
8. Sewer Use - based. on a negative point syste to the amouiit of sewer each project request use category. i.e. the greater number of e the greater the negative points -
'For small I>rojects with four or less uii
c
200 X (requested nurnbe = Negative points to
\ be subtracted fron _____l__l___
total points accurulated .
; Single family homes wi?-l
be exempt from negative
points
(Range 0 -to -S)
For projects of more than four'units:
, 25 X (requested number EDU'S) = Negativc'points to 1.x
100 subtrzcted from tc,tal __I __---_-
points accumulated
4-k
.O.",".*, 1-1.<
2775 OCEAN ST.. CARLSBAD. CALIF. 92008
17141 729-5951
.<k.s*<*.- - ~-
or of Carlebad City EIanag.er
Cerlebad.
CDinectPy on the CBeach
September 18th I979
With reference to Item I9 on the City Council A@mda this evening. f have retriewed the Sewer Allocation System and see no claaaification
for Motels, and if poseible would appreciate speaking to the Council
about this matter.
Tow' Ho&xl-Jonea Tobo Inveetments
R i
1
i
BUILDERS
and
DEVELOPERS
325 Elm Avenue
Post Office Bax 1155
Carlsbad, California 92008
Phone 7141729-791 1
Contractor's
License No. 16 1995
September '17, 1979
YE, Jim Hagaman Planning Director, City of Carlsbad
I200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008
Re: Proposed Sewer Allocation System
Dear Mr, Ragaman:
I have reviewed the proposed sewer allocation system which will be going to Council again on Tuesday, September 18. My coments to you would be as follows:
1. The criteria that is used such as the distance to schools and distance to parks, bears no relationship ttt the planning criteria which is used to locate these facilities, For instance various school sites are delineated on the Carlsbad General Plan and it now turns out t'nat if you are not within 3/8 of a mile from one of these sites, you are in effect pen- alized on your point system, On the otner hand if one lived next door to a noisy gramar school, he would. be rewarded with three points and then would have a very undesirable location for a residence, As a matter of fact, he might even be required under a full E111 to use some noise attenuation measures to mitigate the noise.
Also 1 night point oat that ktte trzmspsrtation route as shown on the accoqaaying maps, that are in the City Hall, have severzl. errors, I have examined the accompanying map in the Laguna Riviera area and find that the transpor- tation nap particularly, is in error as the bus route goes up Valencia Avenue to Hillside and then eastward to Kelly Drive wherein the maps presented to the City Council show the bus route continuing around Park Drive to an eventual. intersection of Kelly,
Page Two Re : September 17, 1979 Proposed Sewer Allocation System
You raised some questions as to what routes the buses actually took a-d I personally observed on Saturday, Sept- ember 15th, at approximately 35 minutes after the hour, bus $20 on the route I have described, I know this sounds
picky, but it is possible that one point would make the difference between obtaining the proposed sewer allocation or not.
I would also like to take exception to the map which shows our proposed development, which is on the west side of Valencia, over a quarter of a mile from the pa~k site that we dedicated to the City of Carlsbad as part of the Laguna Riviera development, The park site is actually 1150.5 feet froa the site, The par,?: and recreation nap shows this property to be over a quarter of a mile away wherein by the accompanying map it is readily ascertainable as it is well within a quarter of a mile away.
I am enclosing a map which will statistically reveal the correctness of my statements, If you have any questions relative to the above, please don't hesitate to call,
Very Truly Yours,
cc to: Pml Bussey