HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-11-06; City Council; 6052; Regional Airport Relocation Instruct CPO DelegateCITY OF CARLSBAD
AGENDA BILL NO. (p D 3r Initial:
Dept.Hd.
DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 1979 C. Atty.
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER C. Mgr.
Subject: REGIONAL AIRPORT RELOCATION -
INSTRUCTION TO CPO DELEGATE
Statement of the Matter
This item has been placed on the agenda at the request of the City's
delegate -to CPO. Lindbergh Field has been designated "as the site
most suitable for serving the commercial air transportation needs
of the San Diego region through 1995." The question yet to be
answered is "how will the region's commercial air transportation
needs be met beyond 1995?"
As indicated in the attached report, CPO proposes to study four
possible sites and to present a summary of the study to an "appropriate
electorate" at the June 1980 primary election to determine.whether
another site (other than Lindbergh Field) should be considered for
the time period beyond 1995. If the electorate indicates another
site should be considered,- alternate sites would-be considered by
the electorate at the November 1980 general election.
The Council may desire to discuss the process outlined and instruct
its CPO delegate on the issue.
Exhibit
CPO Report dated October 30, 1979.
I
f
r
Council Action: -
S
11-6-79 Council directed their CPO delegate to express favor for
placement on the ballot of whether another site other than
Lindbergh Field should be considered as the location for
a regional,airport after 1995, but expressed concern about
placing alternate sites on a subsequent election.
,4
i
October 30, 1979
COMPREHENSIVE
C) "PLANNING ORGANIZATION
Suite 524, Security Pacific Plaza AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION
1200 Third Avenue
San Diego, California 92101
(714) 236.5300
The future of Lindbergh Field as the region's commercial aviation facility
has been an issue for several decades. The convenience of a downtown
airport is indisputable; however, there is a growing Concern that the
limitations of Lindbergh Field are inhibiting economiti growth in the San
Diego region. Noise problems in areas surrounding Lindbergh are also
indisputable, and would be Moth expensive and disruptive to resolve.
There is also a growing awareness of the economic value of the Lindbergh
site for urban and recreation use. And finally, there is a concern that
airspace congestion in the vicinity of Lindbergh is a safety problem
which may be difficult to solve. Numerous studies, dating back to -the
19401s, have been unable to resolve this issue. In recognition of these
problems, the CPO Board of Directors determined in January 1979•to
submit the camuiiercial aviation issue to the appropriate electorate in
1980.
In order to carry out the CPO Board policies, an analysis,of alternative
ca:enercial sites will be conducted. This analysis recognizes the time
required to select a site and properly plan, design and construct an
airport once the site has been designated. Therefore, the study design
is calculated to use all available past information and to -update these
data in order to provide the appropriate information for voter con-
sideration of this issue.
This study will be limited to the following four site areas which were
determined to be the most viable alternatives after an earlier eval-
uation -of 23 potential commercial sites in the San Diego Plan for Air
Transportation (SANPAT) study:
1. Lindbergh Field (3 configurations)
2. MS Miramar (2 configurations)
3. Carmel
4. Otay Mesa
A preliminary step in the site selection process will be the preparation
of all necessary technical data concerning these alternatives with the
overriding thought that this technical material must be placed in a
format which will allow interpretation of its contents, in summary form,
by non -technical people. This format is essential since its findings
must be presented to the general public in the form of a ballot measure
in the 1980 primary elections.
Since the adopted CPO Board Policy has designated the existing Lindbergh
Field facility "as the site most suitable for serving the commercial air
transportation needs of the San Diego region through 1995", the June
SAN DIEGO REGION'S COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Member Agencies Cities of Carl". Chula Vista, Coronado, Dot W. El Cajon, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City.Ocaanside.
Son Diego, San Marcos, Vista, and County of San Diefo/E*olfic#oMeknber. California Department of Transponatwn/Honorary Member. Tijuana, B. CPA.
election serves to allow the region's voters to determine whether
another site should be considered for the time period beyond 1995. If
the public decision is affirmative, the voters will be provided a
measure to allow then to consider alternative sites at the General
Election in November 1980.
The overall work scope outline for the Airport System Plan Coordination
and Update to include the alternative ccamercial airport site analysis
follows.
OVERALL WORK SCOPE OUTLINE
AIRPORT SYSTEM PLAN COORDINATION AND UPDATE
I. SURVEILLANCE
A. Airport Inventory Update
B. Ground Access Data Update
c. Lw4 Use Compatibility
D. System Plan Monitoring
II. OOWINATION AND SERVICE
A. Coordination
B. Service
III. i&EVALVATION AND REAPPRAISAL
A. Ocmnercial Aviation Demand Ebrecasts
1. Review methodology of previous forecasts and verify the accuracy
of the forecasts.
2. Estimate future demand for 1980, 1995, 1990, 1995 and 2000.
3. Research and prepare aircraft mix assumptions for 1980, 1985, 1990,
1995 and 2000.
4. Airline deregulation will be analyzed to determine its effect on
demand and other factors.
5. Analyze changes in origin/destination statistics in order to see
the influence on demand based on location of the alternative airports.
B. General Aviation Demand Forecast
She concern with this data is its relation to commercial demand in order
to best evaluate the overall aircraft operations in the total regional
airport system.
C. Capacity Analysis
1. The overall system capacity has a bearing on system priocities and,
therefore, this analysis is essential to the e,.raluation of alter-
native ccamercial airport sites.
2. A review of recent and planned changes in individual airport capacity
will be analyzed to note their effect on the system plan and the
alternate sites being considered.
D. Aeview and Modification of the Fxistina Plan
1. Determine which areas of the plan have been verified as valid and
-which must be reappraised.
2. A review of the many factors in the plan should reveal the updated
information -necessary to ,provide a better informed decision con-
cerning modification of t>>e existing plan as well as the technical
data for a reasoned selection of a commercial airport to serve
the area.
'1V. s0wrn smmES
2m following special studies shall address seven ccm:*rcial aviation
alternatives at four sites. These alternatives are:
1. Lindbergh Field (existing)
a. Present runway configuration
b. Additional departure runway approximately 3000 heading,
to minimize noise impact
c. Parallel runway to existing 9/27
2. NAS Miramar (existing)
a. rxpansion with a cross runway
b. New optimal configuration
3. Carmel (new)
4. Otay Mesa (existing -now)
r--
A. Airport system Configuration
1. Delineate the system with each of the seven alternative configurations
included as a separa.:e option.
2. Analyze impact of each site on the entire system after analysis in
B., C., D., and E. below.
B. Aif rt Development Concepts
1. Facility requirements will be prepared for each alternative based
on updated information; each concept should provide the same capacity
to as close a degree as possible.
2. Airport Layout and obstruction Clearance Plans for each alternative.
3. Terminal Area'41ans for each alternative.
C. Regional AirVace Utilization Analysis
1. Air traffic flow, analysis will be shown for each site in the system,
both IFR and VFR.
2. Runway configurations will be sub; ted to FAA scrutiny and ccmvent
as to all operational aspects including, but not limited'to, the
sites "place" in the system based on present and planned navaids.
Operational capability and constraints should also be evaluated
for optimum efficiency in the system based on forecast mix, land
use considerations, and proximity to other airports. Anticipated
Y:chnoldgical improvenents-should be analyzed as they relate to each
site.
3. prepare -an Airspace Management Plan-
D. Airport Noise, Analysis
1. Prepare plans for -each site to meet California Noise Standards
}used on forecast demand in 2000, Define noise contours at 5 CNEL
intervals from 60-80 CNIEL.
2. Analyze the probable effects of land use compatibility p",ograms on
the basis of:
a. Acquisition of all incompatible properties within the 65 CNEL
contour.
b. Acquisition of all incompatible properties within the 80 CNEL
contour coupled with noise attenuation and easements within the
65 CNEL contour.
E. Economic Analysis
1. Total public expenditure for airport deve),)pnent and operation
for the years 1980 through 1995 for the following:
A. Site acquisition and preparation;
b. Oonstruction;
c. Access and signing;
d. Facility conversion -including relocation of-G. A. airports;
-e. Environmental protection;
f. Operation, maintenance and depreciation;
g. Debt service; r
h. Improvements and 'remodeling at Lindbergh Field; and
J. Revenue.
2. Estimate Pconanic costs,and benefits associated with alternate use of
sites.
a. Alternative use,.of Lindbergh property;
b. Miramar relocated out of the region; and
c. Alternative -,development precluded.
3. Evaluation of airport construction projects on -regional economy.
4. Effects of airport location on tourism. "
5. Effects of ground transportation costs.
V. RBPOR'TS-
A. _ Tonal Transportation Plan Aviation, Element -Update - 1980
B. Teciuiical Report of Alternative_Site Analysis (Special.Study) '
C. Brochure of Technical Report
D: Airport Inventnry Update - Section I.A.