Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-12-18; City Council; 4022-3; REVISION TO AN EXISTING TENTATIVE MAP TO PROVIDE FOR PHASING FOR A 211 LOT SUBDIVISION LA COSTA LAND COMPANY, e * CITY OF CARLSBAD . L-/ IN I TI AL AGENDA BILL NO. Dept. Hd. 3L DATE: December 18, Cty. Atty. DEPARTMENT: Planning Cty. Mgr. REVISION TO AN EYISTIMG TENTATIVE MAP TO PROVIDE FOR PHASING FOR A 211 LOT SUBDIVISION CT 75-9(A) APPLICANT: LA COSTA LAND COMPANY. SUBJECT: STATEMENT OF THE M44TTER This action was approved by the Planning Commission on November 21, 1979, with concitions. One condition was that the applicant enter a secured agreement to secure payment of the public facility fee prior to approval of the Planning Commission Resolution by the Planning Commission. The applicant as of the date of Planning Commission consideration of this resoltuion had not entered into this secured agreement Therefore the Planning Commission continued deliberation of the resolution to January 9, 1980, The request was noticed for City Council public hearing prior to the Planning Commission making their decision on_ the resolution. This was done to reduce processing time. However, in this case it resulted in a noticed hearing than cannot be acted upon. EXHIBITS Planning Commission Resolution No. 1571 Staff Report dated November 28, 1979 RECOMJTENDAT ION It is recommended that the City Council CONTINUE this item to January 15, 1980. Council Action: 12-18-79 Council continued the matter to the meeting of January 15, 1' ?.* - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 33 19 20 21. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e PLANNING COIJIMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1571 I A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OI CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOJYNENDING APPROVAL OF A REVISION TO AN EXISTING TENTATIVE MAP TO PROVIDE FOR THE PHASING OF A 211 LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED SOUTH OF LA COSTA AVENUE, EAST OF RANCHO SANTA FE. CASE NO. : CT 75-9/CP-16 APPLICANT: Santa Fe Knolls WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit: 1 A portion of lots LZI 5, 8, 9, and 10 of Rancho Las Eneinitas as shown on Map No. 848, as filed in the Office of the County Recorder for San Diego County. has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and .. WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a requt as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; ani WHEREAS, this project has been processed through environmental review as required in Title 19, the Environml I Protection Ordinance. The proposed subdivision has complii I with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protec 1 Ordinance through prior compliance (Section 19.04.153) because: 1. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR-307) was prepared for amendments to the La Costa Master Plan and certif by the City Council on April 27, 1976; 2. A supplement to that EIR has been prepared for the proposed project in conformance with the requirements of the Master Plan; 3. A report, Archaeological Investigations at Santa Fe I< has bcen accepted which mitigates the impacts of the proposed project on the archaeological resources of t project site; and -___ J 2 3 4 5 61 7 8 g 10 l1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 25 27 28 e e 4. There are no substantial changes in the proposed proje which have not been adequately addressed by the Master or Supplemental EIRs. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 28th day of Rovember, 1979, hold a duly noticed, public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pel desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all facto- relating to the revised tentative tract map (CT 75-9(A)) ai found the following facts and reasons to exist: I Findings 1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because : a) The project density of '3 dwelling units per acre conforms witi; the Land Use Element designakion o residential low-mediuin density, 0-4 du/acre; and The project does not conflict with any elenent o the general plan. 2) The site is physically suitable for the type and dens . a) The subdivision has been designed recognizing th I b) I of development because: natural slope and soil constraints of the site; and I b) The low density of 3 du/acre allows for the phys consideration of the site. 3) An environmental impact report (EIR-307) was prepared for amendments to the La Costa Masker Plan and certif by the City Council on April 27, 1976; A supplement to that EIR has been prepared for the proposed project in conformance with the requirements of the Master EIR; A report, Archaeoloqical _- Investigations at Santa Fe I( has been accepted which mi?T(qates the impacts-of the proposed project on the archaeological resources of t project site; and 1 i .2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 'Po 12 XI. 13 14 15 16 17 l8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 '0 There are no substantial changes in the proposed pro]€ which have not been adequately &dressed by the Master or Supplemental EIR'S. This project is consistent with all public facility policies and ordinances because: a) 4) Sewer service is not available for this project this time. The Planning Commission has, by incl of an appropriate condition, insured that the final map for each phase shall not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer servicc is available to serve.the project. In addition, condition has heen ad.ded requiring that a note 1 placed on the final map that building permits mi not be issued unless the City Engineer deternlinc that sewer service is available. Since the final map cannot be approved unless sewer service is available, the building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, the requirements of the pub1 facilities element of the General Plan have bee met insofar as they apply to sewer service for .this aild tenative map approval. Agreements have been made with both Encinitas ; San Dieguito Unified School District to pay scl. fees. I b) c) Water service wi1.1 be provided by Olivenhain Municipal Water District. d) Gas and electric service will be provided by SDG&E b All necessary on-site a~d adjacent public faci would be required as per the City's Public Irn~ Ordinance or as conditions of approval. e) I I f) At this time, all other public facilities nece to serve this project will not be available c( with need. 'The Planning Commission hasI by ii of an appropriate condition, required that thc project contribute to the cost of such facili- Since the developer will pay for its proportic share of the public facilities which it will require, the Planning Conmission is satisfied the requirements of the public facilities ele of the general plan have been satisfied. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the followinc I i I ! .3 I recommended approval of CT 75-9(A) , subject to certain a, 2 3 4 5 6 7 a g 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 a7 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e Conditions 1) Approval is granted for CT ?5-9(A) as shown in Plannir Commission CT 75-9(A) Exhibit A, dated 11/13/79, on file in the Planning Department, and incorporated her( by reference. Developzent shall be substantially as shown on said Exhibits. -- 2) A11 corditions of CT 75-9 (City Council Resolution No 4072) are still in effect, except as otherwise noted herein, 3) Only four model homes shall be permitted as per Secti 21,60,030. 4) The applicant shall provide evidence that school fees have been paid prior to issuance of building permits. 5) This subdivision is approved upon the express conditi that the final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds at the time of such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision. 6) This subdivision is approved upon the express conditi that bviifding permits will not be issued for developm of the subject property unless the City Engineer dete that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy, If the City Engir determines that sewer facilities are not available, building permits will not be issued. 7) Conditions 23 & 24 of City Council Resolution No. 407 are deleted and replaced as follows: Mission Estancia and 1,a Costa Avenue shall be dedicat and graded on the basis of an 84 foot right of way pl slope easements as required. Improvements shall consisk of €ull improvements to city standards for a foot half street, including street lights. Additionz at each intersection with Rancho Santa Fe Road and fc a distance of 100 feet, the pavement shall be widenec to a minimum of 40 feet and a taper from the 40 foot width to the 32 foot width of at least 200 feet shal. be provided to the satisfaction of the City Enfiineer All slopes adjacent to the streets shall be 2:l maxi1 Mission Estancia shall be constructed from Rancho Sal Fe Road to the intersection with "I" Street concurrei with Unit No. 1 of thc subdivision. Mission Estanci, shall be constructed from "I" Street to the proposed Costa Avenue intersection concurrent with Unit No. 3 the subdivision. La Costa Avenue shall be constructed concurrent with Unit No. 3 of the subdivision. ; I. s- 1 2 3 .4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I 5 16 2.7 18 3-9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e '0 The applicant shall enter into a secured agreement fo improvement of the northerly half of Mission Estancia along the proposed park site frontage to City of Carl standards. Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be widened and/or striped provide a separate southbound left turn lane into Mission Estancia and a separate northbound right turn lane into the street- The widening and/or striping shall extend approximately 600 feet north of the intersection and approximately 403 feet south ar,d sha be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This work shall be accomplished with the construction of Unit No. 1 of the project. The eastern half street of Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be improved at the intersection.of La Costa Avenue sufficient to provide turning moves in and out of La Costa Avenue and shall be designed to the satisfactio of the City Engineer. This work shall be accomplishe concurrently with the construction of La Costa Avenue The applicant shall pay a public facility fee as established in City Council Policy No. 17 prior to issuance of building permits. This approval is expres conditLoned upon the applicant entering into a secure agreement to secure paynient of this fee prior to appr of the resolution for CT 75-9(A) by the Planning Corn Brush clearance shall. be provided around the edges of each unit to the satisfaction of the City of Carlsbad Fire Narshall o A looped water line shall be installed from "H" Stree in Unit #3 to "F" Street in Unit #2, to the satisfact of the City of Carlsbad Fire Marshall. This line sha be installed concurrent with the development of Unit 8) 9) I ~ 20) , 11 11) #3 - I ! AYES: Schick, Rorrbotis, Jose, Leeds, Marcus, I Priestedt, Larson 1 NOES : None NOV7, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the foregc recitations are true and correct. - EDWIN S. SCHICK, JR., C ATTEST: CARLSBAD PLANNING COMM JAMES C. HAGATvViN, Secretary CARLSBRD PLANNING COMMISSION j .5 e STAFF REPORT P DATE : November 28, 1979 TO : Planning Commission FROM : Planning Department RE : CT 75-9(A) APPLICANT: Santa Fe Knolls REQUEST: Revision to an existing tentative map to provide for phasing for a 211 lot subdivision. BACKGROUND Location and Description of Property The subject property is located south of La Costa Avenue and east of Rancho Santa Fe. The proposed subdivision will require an extension of La Costa Avenue. The property contains 70 acres and features rolling topography with scattered natural vegetation. A high school site has been designated for the southeastern portion of the property. No changes have been proposed for the lots or streets; this application is for phasifig only. Existing Zoning Subject Property: PC North: PC South: PC East: PC West: PC Existing Land Use - Subject Property: Vacant North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Vacant Environmental Impact Information The proposed subdivision has complied with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance through Prior Compliance, (Section 19.04.153) because: 1. e, i) a) An Environmental Impact Report (EIR-307) was prepared for amendments to the ~a Costa Master Plan and certified by the City Council on April 27, 1976; b) A supplement to that EIR has been prepared for the proposed project in conformance with the requirements of the Master EIR; c) A report, Archaeological Investigations at Santa Fe Knolls has been accepted which mitigates the impacts of the proposed project on the archaeological resources of the project site; and d) There are no substantial changes in the proposed project which have not been adequately addressed by the ?laster or Supplemental EIR'S. General Plan Information A. Land Use Element This property is designated as RLM, Residential Low and Medium Density, 0-4 du/acre. The proposed 211 units on 70 acres of land has a density of 3 dwelling units per acre D B. Public facilities 1) Sewer: Sewer service will be provided by the Leucadia County Water District. At this time, only 50 sewer units have been provided. However, as per Section 21.49.020(10), revisions of approved tentative maps are permitted under the planning moratorium. This revision will provide for phasing which will allow the use of the 50 edu's. 2) Schools: The applicant has entered into agreements with the San Dieguito Unified and Encinitas Union School Districts to pay fees to mitigate conditions of over- crowding - 3) Water: Water service will be provided by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. 4) Gas & Electric: These services will be provided by San Diego Gas & Electric, 5) On-site and Adjacent Public Facilities: All necessary on-site and adjacent public facilities would be required as per the City's Public Improvement Ordinance or as conditions on either the original approval or on this approval a -3- L. b e 6) Other Public Facilities: All other public facilities necessary to serve this project will not be available concurrent with need. The Planning Commission may, by inclusion of an appropriate condition, require that the project contribute to the costs of such facilities according to City Council Policy No. 17. Since the development would pay its appropriate share of the public facility it would require, the Planning Commission could be assured that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan would be satisfied. In addition, park-in-lieu fees would be assessed at the time of building permit issuance. Past History and Related Projects CT 75-9, Santa Fe Knolls, City Council Resolution No. 4072, Planning Commission Resolution No, 1297. On January 4, 1977, the City Council approved this 211 lot subdivision. The current proposal is a request to add phasing to this subdivision. Concerns at the time of approval included the park site (Stagecoach Park), the high school site, the extensive amount of grading and maintenance of man-made slopes. - Major Planning Considerations 1) Will the proposed phasing have any effects on the :: No other changes are requested. conditions of CT 75-9? Primarily concerning land- scaping of slopes and open space and street dedication and improvement. 2) Should any new conditions be added to account for changes in requirements since the original CT 75-9 was adopted in January, 1977? D i s cu s s ion The only change in this tentative map is the addition of phasing to an already approved project. shows 5 phases. with the fifth phase having only 11 units and the high school site. Concerns on this project when first approved in 1977 were slope maintenance, the high school site and the park site The phasing is done in 50 unit increments due to the restrictic on the number of sewer units available. This limitation, in addition the original configuration of the subdivision, has resulted in unusaal phasing units. Unit 1 is in the south- westernmost corner and. includes seven lots on "D" Street. Four of these will be model hones. The tentative map The first four phases contain 50 units each This will allow the .7 models cri T?;,r;::Lio S3nta F? Sd, ;ii?.Ci si3ce t.hc o;>p9or,.te SIC:<? 0: t i:< j I: b<> cr-> y i 1 T'i!LC,<' 5 , t ~<'j(:> .:. S i:; 1 2 j r y-r;.z! I?,i ? -. 3- The remainder o 9 unit 5 is at the very nort CT end of the subdivision. The other units were designed to accommodate the allowed 50 units in the most logical manner possible. The applicant confined each phase to as small an area as possible. Most other configurations would result in piecemeal street con- struction by not developing all the units on a particular street. The original tenative map approval required that the park site be offered prior to final map. In addition, the school site was to have been offered to the San Dieguito Unified School District. The offer has been made to the school district. Condition 23 and 24 of City Council Resolution No. 4072 required the dedication and improvement of La Costa Avenue and Mission Estancia. These conditions have been altered to allow for the phasing and changes in traffic. The improvements will be increased from 28' to 32' half street improvements on Mission Estancia. Mission Estancia will be constructed from Rancho Santa Fe to 'rI'l Street concurrent with Unit 1. La Costa Avenue will be constructed and Plission Estancia extended to La Costa Avenue concurrent with development of Unit 3. In addition, left turn and right turn pockets will need to be provided on Rancho Santa Fe. This will require either striping or road widening. New conditions include those regarding sewer availability, the public facilities fee and brush clearance and a looped water line for protection. Recommendation StaEf recommends APPROVAL of CT 75-9(A) based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because : a) The project density of 3 dwelling Units per acre conforms with the Land TJse Element designation of residential low-medium density, 0-4 du/acre; and b) The project does not conflict with any element of the general plan, 2) The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development because: a) The subdivision has been designed recognizing the natural slope and soil constraints of the site; an4 1, t, I :\ -4 - 3) An environm @ ntal impact report (EIR-30 9 1 was prepared for amendments to the La Costa Master Plan and certified by the City Council on April 27, 1976; A supplement to that EIR has been prepared for the proposed project in conformance with the requirements of the Master EIR; A report, Archaeological Investigations at Santa Fe Knolls has been accepted which mitigates the impacts of the proposed project on the archaeological resources of the project site; and There are no substantial changes in the proposed project which have not been adequately addressed by the Master or Supplemental EIR'S. 4) This project is consistent with all public facility policies and ordinances because: a) Sewer service is not available for this project at this time. The Plannincj Commission has, by inclusior: of an appropriate condition, insured t5at the final map for each phase shall not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. In addition, a condition has been added requiring that a note be placed on the final map that building permits may not be issued unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available. Since the final map cannot be approved unless sewer service is available, the building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, the requirements of the public facilities element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this and tenative map approval. b) AcJreements have been made with both Encinitas and San Dieguito Unified School District to pay school fees . c) Water service will be provided by Olivenhain Municipal Water District. d) Gas and electric service will be provided by SDG&E. e) All necessary on-site and adjacent public facilities would be required as per the City's Public Improvemer Ordinance or as conditions of approval. i- __ e 4 f) At‘this time, all other public facilities necessary to serve this project will not be available concurrent with need. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition, required that the project contribute to the cost of such facilities. Since the developmen will pay for its proportionate share of the public facilities which it will require, the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the public facilities element of the general plan have been satisfied. Conditions 1) Approval is granted for CT 75-9(A) as shown in Exhibit A, dated 11/13/79, on file in the Planning Department. Approval shall be substantially as shown. I_ 2) All conditions of CT 75-9 (City Council Resolution No. 4072) are still in effect, except as otherwise noted herein. 3) Only four model hones shall be permitted as per Section 21.60.030. 4) The applicant shall provide evidence that school fees have been paid prior to issuance of building permits. 5) This subdivision is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds at the time of such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision. 6) This subdivision is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determine that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. If the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are not available, building permits will not be issued, 7) Conditions 23 & 24 of City Council Resolution Mo. 4072 are deleted and replaced as follows: Mission Estancia and La Costa Avenue shall be dedicated and graded on the basis of an 84 foot right of way plus slope easements as required. Improvements shall consist of full improvements to city standards for a 32 foot half street, including street lights. Additionally at each intersection with Rancho Santa Fe Road and for a distance of 100 feet, the pavement shall be -:iidened to EI minimum of -?-<I feet alid a taper frcm thlr! =sot wi3:;t-h .-. 3 2 f 0:) -t r..: 1 (j +- 2 I’, f & i;. ; <? 2 5 k- 2 c I) tij :}le: :<;>tis,taecion of t.fiL~ ( s;.c:>Q>< zl)j;]ck2nt k.2 t’ne ._ q~r~~~~:~ s:;:iIj -6- b iB Mission.Estancia shall be constructed from Rancho Santa Fe Road to the intersection with "I" Street concurrent with Unit No. 1 of the subdivision. Yission Estancia shall be constructed from "I" Street to the proposed La Costa Avenue intersection concurrent with Unit No. 3 of the subdivision. La Costa Avenue shall be constructed concurrent with Unit No. 3 of the subdivision. The applicant shall enter into a secured agreement for improvement of the northerly half of Mission Estancia along the proposed park site frontage to City of Carlsbad standards. Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be widened and/or striped to provide a separate southbound left turn lane into Mission Estancia and a separate northbound right turn lane into the street. The widening and/or striping shall extend approximately 600 feet north of the intersect and approximately 400 feet south and shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This work shall be accomplished with the construction of Unit No. 1 of the project. The eastern half street of Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be improved at the intersection of La Costa Avenue sufficient to provide turning moves in and out of La Costa Avenue and shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This work shall be accomplished concurrently with the construction of La Costa Avenue. The applicant shall pay a public facility fee as establis1 in City Council Policy No. 17 prior to issuance of building permits. This approval is expressly conditioned upon the applicant entering into a secured agreement to secure payment of this fee prior to approval of the resolution for CT 75-9(A) by the Planning Commission, Brush clearance shall be provided around the edges of each unit to the satisfaction of the City of Carlsbad Fire Marshall. A looped water line shall be installed from 'IH" Street, in Unit #3 to 'IF" Street in Unit $2, to the satisfaction of the City of Carlsbad Fire Marshall. This line shall be installed concurrent with the development of Unit 83. Exhibits Exhibit A, dated November 13, 1979 1,ocatio:l Xap C; L;i Cn;inci 1 I?eso;.ution Eo. 4272. 8) 9) 10) 11) -7- x;.: ar 'a -e ' - - .. - CfTY LIMIT: -.. - .. COWJ -- .. c'7-75-9 (A) ~pc -=-I"& L44D 0. -* _- 1. s' .. ta Fe. I? OA fR school District: 8-nmw+.v -.--,- ~ j- .5- 2' 3. .4 61 GI '7 g cl 10 1-2 J3- c) r, e I I'\ISSOL';TIC)N NO. __-_--. 4 (17 7 e i I A liI:,C;~j:tUT%OfJ OF' 'j?IIE ClTIlr COU?.lC!I% 07.. 'J'IIZ Cl'J.'Y 0:' C;ARLSi:.T..I>, CAL3. J?0;21XA, AX'Pj?OVIT;\1G FOR A 2II--J,O'i'. SIICjlT.VZSI(;l~! 03 l?F.Qj? GEl?C?i~LltLY I,(>CA !> ON YiX E!'ST SIJIK CP RAIs2CilD S?,N'j.'.L F R@?dI BE'Ti2'6GN LA COS?.'A AVlTT<[jjj j;:>;[rsl.js :< ()2J ;;T<]> Or.,j:Vlll~flnXN ]<Cjy-]> . APPL:iCAP!?.' : . LA C0S'j.A 1,?4:.'171? COXPAMY' e '&fI'xl]i CcI~~~'j!~();.:S 'j''l<'I'-,'YIT]JZ !?A]? (Cy' 7 5-9) I I c_ _____---________________._.________ I --.--. ------- : WIiI'I:EAS, on I.:c>vwI'~E~ 3.2, 3.976 I tk~: Car3.sI;;d Ci.tl7 ??Xi21 ?orj!x;!<.ssi.or? adop'ccd l?c:sol.ution XO c 1297 reco;rin~ea:~;Lng to .. the C: I cou:.~cil that 'l?entativc !Gap (C!? 75-9) be conditionally appmvt I I '* I ~ ;i:od .. VJIJi7~lYiZA.S 7 the Ci-L.y Council of thc City of Cczrlsbc?ci, 01 1kcx:iiber 22 , 1976 r consiCerec3. t?ic recom~~lendat:i-oi-1 of the P1a:c.~ a. I t 18 '19 0 20 .. ' 1 P-.c>.I..ccCio!~ Gx:-cf.$.ncz11ce of 1972; 1' i NOW, TI-TEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by .the City Council o I I ! c<,t.)T Cjf CZl;?l:Thad 21s fof.'lOVTS: That the above recitatj.oj?s are t.rue 2nd co:t:."c, I 2 2 23 24 25 26 Iz. 'yha'i s;~i.d Tent;;i-,iwe !bic?p , togeilic:: IJ~~AI the. p:: fcj~: 5.i;~ c?es:'ig:n and iinproi.7cmc.nt ailit subj ~cL to .tt_>c: condit5.oris -i,]j.i.s rcso~.ut-ion , is c~onsisi-.~;~ t with al-L applicable gcne:c;i 3. a spec;ific plans of thc City 05 Carlsbi-id, I ! 0 ylh;lt .:.:IC fj,il:jj j1<2:< ~f t11~: I.'J.~~~.~~1~.~.i~..1 C<:~:W!~SS< <>il 1 j C. '. '" 7w c e I 3 Co:ici c.,nd to the satisZaction of tlic fo1l.owing con3itions : 1. The approvnl j.s yrantec3. Eor the land der;crib,ed in 51 G 7/ 81 9 10 the plot plc?,n subn.itt..cd, Izbeled I3xhLhi.k "A" , d.nt Eovcnbe~ I(; r 197 G , except 2.:; i.iidi.caJke6. herein. 'I' $in:il- ntap shall he su~::ini. ~tcci for app:i:ovn1. ~,7.i.thin eiyht.ceiz msnths frcm <:he diate of fin;~.I r:cti~711 by Cj-ty CounciI., arid shall bc in suhstctni:i.aI. conforn with the ten tai3ive subdivision nap, E:t;hihit ''Ar1 I: S i; YC; e t , . n cti~,~? s s 5 a 1- 1 be de s i g il a t c (3. in a c c o r d 31-1 c c P.I .i City Council. Policy 23 and sha2.1 he approved hy t Plani-tincj Director px-j-cr to zpproval oC the fiiial 3. Concu.i-reIit with final nap zpproval, the applic::n- ' , shall yri>.nt ;in opes space ease~.el>t for m;:intcnanc 2. 1 12 x:1 I and improve:.::ent purpo.';es over tliosc por-ti.oxs of . lots des.czj-b?G in Condition 5 bc1-0~ o L .. + - < !+ 2.5 - L, .. .i i . 2 d5 1 I the 3.p~ 1. i e i: 1-i .t s 1; C? 3. I 1-j c s t ?I i>j3 6. s X! d a9 II'C ~TLX .r: k s cji I > : ;< 2.7 4< >" - 0 I- 18.1 ' :""I 19 . 20 2 1. 2 3 2 4 25 KLI in'caiircd c 1) , 5. .prior to the issuance of zny building per-m:i:i;s, -1: . applicant shall subnit a .pc!rrnanen.t landscap.i.i;y c. i i. irrigatj-on plan to the Parks and Recreation D.j-rc , for his approval. The. plan shaXL: (a) Cover those slo;:.;es 3-11 excess 03 five fce-5: Y hai.gl-ii-: at the i-eiiy: crud the s.j.clcs oC l.ot:; vsl the toe of suc?'i slope?:.; is adjacent t~ p-~il>3: .ric~li-I-ls--o~-k:ny a ! Ut :i 1. :i. ze f ire .-~"c!'iarci a1.k I d rou311t --re. s i :;tan i-. s cap j. 1-1 cj .isl 11 i c: h i I 1 c 1 lid c :; t r c c s a 1.1 d s 11 rub L; w 11. .. I .' 1 (b ) renc11 a variety of sizes at r\lat.vri.ty; alld , . I 1 .# (c) ~til..i.ze an i.rriga-kion systcrn c?ppropr:i.ate f ma <.)~kcn;.~ncc o? t?ie nx;-ti.i~-~~d .I 1.~in~1sc~i~~i.n~ i. 11 I .. '.. 2.1 21 3i 4 5~ 6 71 8i 9: 10 I?- 0 -' . t,ion oc:cur::; in uni LS, this . contii ti011 shrtLl Ix ~nct 01-1 a unj.-t-hy-uriit- 13rir;i.s . I .. . I 7. IJrior to tile issi:ai)cc of 13ui1,d.ing' pc~~iits, t11c-2 pr arcx; iis i-nd..icai:cd 5-n ConC!it.ion 5 shz.7.1. be assure a manncr acc:cptahle to thc C:'~ty Coun.ci1- * Vegetation .cLear?..ng opc:rzkions sh;il 3. be made no 1 than tt.io wceks in adv;-incc . of grnd.iny (I ~\ro gsc:i'i:i.ng :;hcclI. OCCUI: du.r."ny the mcii i.hs OC JZ?IILL thrc;u.yl> I$?rch, e>:c;c-:pt w1-iel-1. special. T~C;~SUL'CS cim I taken to ccntrol sj.~--~atioa. 'This cor!c?.iLtic):l shal met to the satisfacti.on 02 the City Engineer, vision OF pciTiayLc.!i>t: O~CX :.;pnc~ naF)1-tcr\i?~~cc on -th< 8 a 9 . I I 10. j.,1.1. graded surfzces shall. be wat-ercci 2nd rolled form a cfimpact~i! cap of soil. j I 1 I 11- n Concu.rzent w\ritli final map rccordatLon the zp]?lj.c4 . shal-1 d.cc?.:icFite P~rca "Arr to the City of Carls!md , ' shown on E>:hihj.t "A" dated .,PJo\7emSer 1.6, 197G for The park sj.'ce SO dedicated Sh2ll. pa.rIi pI:rpo.c;cS. Lg 8: .\ 0 [: .- 2 2 3 tr, 13 D 9:h.c vj,yi:c]: systen se]:v.',ncj- 3.o-k.s ?!-3o r c7.S s!10??11 011 1.9 1.4.. All c?rainage easements shall be improved by a cu i or drai.ilage channel of .adeq\iat-.e size I whiche\Ter ,' required by the San Diego County Dc;,?ar.tmen'c df Sanitation an.6 F.l.ood Cont~rol c Where a dra.~..naye cInarlne1. 4:; reqv2>:ed, s~ch ~11231~1~1 ~h2i.?. be :Lin<:!:j I' 1 I -. 2'i 2.4 :6 25 Sa~j-ta'c~~i-~ axid Ylood Coiii7:ro:l.f An accer;s ea:;en~cI. s h a 1.3. 1-3 :? pr ov j. dc c? to e a cl1 dr ;i i I? ag e :; y~; -tcm L!LI .i. n -1: r,: access po.in-~ noi: ci:i.rcctly ;c~c:~?ss~.L~:ic ~ZI:OI?~ a p\.~iil 3:0~2ciway, said. ;ICCCSS e;isomiil-k sh;~..:L1. hc; paved t31-it aI.igncc1 -to the sc:tisfacttch 02 the: County Dc:piir+ ' of Smik>. t:.i(ln anti I'lood coll~l:.Yo~. 1 i ; .Ij " 2l 4 si 3i 10 9l 6i 71 8/ l2.1 X? 0 G ~ c1 3 g 13i . CrI x 4 G ti1 C) 16. , All :~ix:face w~~~.:~::~ ox:i-ghi:.ki ng w.i. tl-1.i.r~ thc sc11~~iI.j~~~ and all. surface i.:;ttcr-s tlta 1: inay ~~LOV onto tlie SI divir:i.on from ad j ncent I.;i~.;d.s sha5.1 he 'disposcd ( a drainzcjc syk~cn satj.si:ac Lory to the Sail 11i.txio Dep;:i:-i:mc?:-1-t of Sanitati.cn rtiid Flood C0n'ij:o.f.. 2.7. That pns:tj.on OE Exhibi-t IiA" , dat.ed ?~?GVCTI~CI~ l.G ,- lal>c.l.c:d Iligl-1 Scliool_ site f shall be incI.u.dec3. wit1 the Imu.ndaries of the fii>~..l. su?~fii~7isj...sa rmp <XJ.ICI High School District. i he 0ffe1:ed f03: G.cZLC~:~~.<)E to *Lll<? SLII D.i.egl1.i.to UI I . .. 18. If requ.csiscd by the Citl7 Xnyinecr r an. amcr16ed Tc Map shz.ll be su5rcitteci for approval by the C.i.t..y Enc~.i.nee;r prior to review of the final map to as; corr,p:l-iaiice with all coni1rii;icrns of approval.. 1-9 e The locatli-on of fire hydr2n'i.s sht;ll. he appr.oved the ]?ire Flarsha!.. In oi-cler to provi.c':e for reas( fire protection duri.ng *-lie consi:!:uc tion peri.oc1 r sut16ivi.2.e;: s1ial.l maintain passzh1.e ve!iicul~z~: zc( ' to all. buil.dir:qs ~nd adeqv.a-L?: f3.1-e hydrants wit1 recpirecj. ?ire f1.oras shz1-1 be in sci:vice and accc prior .to the locc?tS.oii of cojnbu.stil~I.cs on site e 1 j I 20. Or~~;:.j.l~e~~t~I. S~TCZ~ l.i.<;tit.inc;' sIiaJ.1 112 provide6 501 i i 5) CL - r.3 L 0 L? 23. r All :1&1>4. ~I>C?/OX etis~~teil'is reyuj.jrec7 sh~.ll- IE qrzi I . .%I1 22 23 24 25 I: e-fz o 2: t. o f CJ e <j :I. o cj i c ci I i nvc s .t ig a ti OZ: ai 1 d a c cmp ?L e. grading pian of .i-:hc entire site , when rcqui-:cc?ci I City Eny.tnec?x-, Tl~e .rcpu;l:.': aiid p1.an sha.13. 33e x)>:( l~y civi :L eiIgi.nccrs 1.i.cei-ir;c-.:c'i hy i-llict State of Ca:L: and exp:?rienc~:d in efosion coni-.~-o%. f who xli;~11 br -. accqta.J:,.Ze to the Cit17 33rigli.nccr. 'J'hcy s1i;ilI- ce: that: .i: 1.1 cy- 11 a~,~c! i nvc 5; t i q i-: 'Ce d th c s ri-i;. c? and p rc?pa x-( I data wit11 rul.1. co:~r;i.de~-;-~tion of the c;onscc~~-ir)ii~~: to the i.ncludcd ant! nc:i.g:lbosilng psopcstj.cs and ; confo~rnimcc wit11 -the Gcol.09 ic an6 Seismic Gafct; j j I I ' Elcwcnt 02 the Gcncral. J'lan. 3.. 6 r) *I 4 7 p1 1.0 9l 5 .GI 71 11 12 n . 141..,sxon 9. I-::;tmrj.zi .-;liaI. 11. be <.~q it .:I~T.,c;? 011 t11c ba:;;.:; . a twen.ty--c::I.ijht fook i; irreet. section frox ~'\nnch(:) : J?e Road -Lo thc j.r,.~:(~~~~~~~c~i~Il wit11 !'PA'' Strect . i:?i ~.<stancrin :;h:lili i~e iiitproved cin tli& 12iisi-s of a. fox two foot hl1:i.f s'ircct section El:o!n thc i1YLerseCj-i with ",'' St1 eet to ihc in?essec:tion with prcpor;c La Costa Zivenue. ~~~nprovemen'i..s sIiaI.:L Le as s~J.o~.:z 011 thc, t~~:kaktvc e;:c:ep-'; 'i:liat :;tree.t I:ig!1t,s :::hci;3.1 he incl.udcd aCCG to City 02 CSI-~S~IZIC~ S.~-ZI,TICI~~~~S and LII S~O~CS a<if I , to the strc:ct sh;ziL bz 2 :I- ~XIX:~IW.IX* The app!.:i.e~>nt sh3.2-<- enter into a sec~red agi:c-!c:~~,c for irt~.p-rovm-!snC of -i:I-:c? nortl-tcu J.!y ha :I..$ of I.'lissic;r Bstanci.;; alonc; 'ihc? ~>ropose(l Stiigecoiich Park sitc frontage, to city of Ca,Yls!>ad standclrcls . 24 . La Costa- Avei>u.e rri. :j!i-t-of--v~~y, j.nclI>d.inq s~.opc e;: rneat:s, shal 1- ?E dec!rlc;:::ec'l ad 1.a CO:Y:XI Avc:ll~.~e sl- I i I ' section and riinpirovc 011 the ]]asis c);l' ;?. foj:ty-,t.b;c j half si;~:-~et sec'i.i~>33 ZEE~!~ !??;.;icho Sa11 La Fc Tioad <-.c $11 'i er s .:! c': t. i cn wi th pro? o s (2 6 1.1 i s s :j. on 12 >., r: -*- ~mcis. Irr be graded <?I1 the 12: i:< of ;in ei.gfi-ky.-.r-'our f00.t si: ' 24 26 uti.1it.y scrvices to thc sc!~.,~.ivi..;:i..on I wI1ici1 w~.]J. within fu.tni.-c5 puh 1.ic st:xec?-L.s , shall. he rasdc: subo to the ~K~~II-c: p:?hLj.c s-t~~c-il eascincii'i \-illc:11 tllz s-L easemcnis. :is yi:aiit.(>Cj o . 29. . I?r:i.o:r tu tl-1ci.r ~il>j~~~~\~i~l. I i.inj~rovc:~t~~!~-~ I-. p1::111s f01: -:: -:* . :I- 21 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1:L .@ 30. j'i:L-- r) ln;>l\-rncl.;3.e SI.~;><:.C; OCC\I :'I-I-ig ., On t11e wo' sc;h0c-)3- . s:i"le as 2 ]:c2:;u].i: of the 'c~j~~xl.~l~~-L~j of I-ots and ilTIpx i 1 I mcl>.tr; j,.n t]ie ]:):I ~.>j.l<~;c ~f. the SL1bd.ivri si.on sha1.1 im.c liiax j-rfilljx 1~j:adcs of 2. 25 : I., znd sh~~.:i-J. he CO~1-;:OU~: 1): sl-~jpc~ ,-nay be i~lcrc:ased to 'a grade 05 2. 0,0 : I- Upa~ i11.to tlle c><isti?>cj ;1~?.tu-~i2.3. SlfipcS . 'I.'hcse KI~~:!-.IT~~G{ 1 ap~j:o~;-~]. 0% the sa11 ~icg~.it-o Unified lIiyh School 1listrj.c.;:. "]le ap;?]..? car,,t sl-!a1.~ inst.nl.r pcxrn~nc~nt I.andscapin~ i r:c ig 2 .i: j.. 0 It 011 s J.c)p,z s s j. .i;u~>:L.~:<l on 'cl ic? E ig h S ~h C)O 1- and s1;all. )na.int?..:.ll SXI~Z ur:t:i..1 SUC~ ti~fie as t.31~ s clistricJc accept,r; the dedicntion of tllc site OY otj~er~~-j.se ;;ssu.ncs the inaintenance tllcncof . PASSED f APpRDTJEj] AED 11130~~~3 at ii regular reeting ~js- ,. 37.. I1 day of -__-- J2nI.jZi-J Ca:t--sj>,ad city Cou.nci]_ held on the -_.-- 4th ]>y i;hct ~~~~~J-~i~?5~>,~ vote, 'io wit: .- i AY)<S : C011nc.i Imcn frazee, .. Lcwi > , ._. I'ack~~rd i;nd Sk0t1-1.i 23 2 4 26 =! 01; s .J , I ! e e tR CRStR November 30, 1 ~ TO : Carlsbad City Council FROM: La Costa Land Company SUBJECT: La Costa Land Company Sewer Availability. At a 2:30 P.M., Wednesday, November 28, 1979 meeting, your Honorable Body refused to approve a City Manager's recomenda- tion concerning sewer availability in the San Marcos Water Distr: It is respectfully requested that you reconsider this matter at your meeting of Tuesday, December 4. We do not believe that the City will incur any significant lia- bility if it acts at this time. We point out that our company has always been aware that no sewer permits could ever be issued unless the3an Marcos project is completed. We have always reali that part of that completion depends upon City of Carlsbad approv The practical effect of finding that sewers can reasonably be ex- pected to be available is that it will allow ( on December 6) two tentative maps to be submitted for review by the Planning Depart- ment ( Meadowbrook and Rancheros) and the processing of a parcel map dividing the La Costa northeast area into four large parts. The sewer program itself will be reviewed by the Planning Commis- sion on December 12 and hopefully by the City Council at its firs or second meeting in January. The City of Carlsbad review, what- ever the conclusion would be should be concluded before the sub- division maps are actually presented to the Planning Commission and City Council. Obviously if the sewer project is turned down by the city it will be impossible to further process the tentative maps unless the San Marcos Water District finds sewer availability from other sources - We are sorry that we were unable to submit this request for re- consideration prior to the completion of the agenda for your December 4 meeting. However, we do point out that this matter was originally on the November 20 agenda for decision; discussion and decision was delayed until November 28 because the time on November 20 was used in discussing the sewer allocation program for the area of the city served by the city sewer agency. ly submitted, COSTA DEL MAR ROAD - CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA