HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-12-18; City Council; 6103; 18 Unit CondominiumCITY OF CARLSBAD
AGENDA BILL NO.
DATE:
DEPARTMENT:
INITIAL
_Dept. Hd.
December 18. 1979
Planning
Cty. Atty
C
Cty. Mgr.
SUBJECT:18 UNIT CONDOMINIUM CT 79-12/CP-16
APPLICANT: MALTER
STATEMENT OF THE MATTER
The subject property is located on the northwest corner of
El Fuerte and Luciernaga Streets in the La Costa area. The
General Plan in this area designates 10 units to the acre
with up to 20 units to the acre with appropriate amenities.
The proposed 18 units on 1.1 acres of land provides a net
density of 16.4 dwelling units to the acre.
Staff and the Planning Commission felt that the amenities
provided on the plan are appropriate for the increase in
density. There is some underground parking, the units are
oriented to the open space and, in general, the overall plan
is comprehensive embracing land, building, landscaping and -
their relationships.
EXHIBITS
Staff Report dated November 28, 1979
PC Resolution No. 1570
Location Map
Exhibit A dated August 6, 1979
Exhibits B, C, D (1) , D (2) and E dated September 19, 1979
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Staff and Planning Commission recommend that the
City Council direct the attorney to prepare documents approving
CT 79-12 and CP-16 as per Planning Commission Resolution No.
Council Action:
12-18-79 Council directed the City Attorney to prepare documents approving
CT 79-12 and CP-16, as per Planning Commission Resolution 1570
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 28, 1979
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: CT 79-12/CP-16; 18 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EL FUERTE AND
LUCIERNAGA STREETS, LA COSTA .
APPLICANT: MALTER
I. BACKGROUND
Location and Description of Property
The subject property is located on the northwest corner of
El Fuerte and Luciernaga Streets in La Costa. The property
consists of two adjacent parcels totaling approximately 1.1
acre. Both lots have been previously graded and are predomi-
nately level, rising approximately 12 feet above Luciernaga
along the southwestern property boundary. Low-lying native
vegetation currently covers the site.
• \
Existing Zoning
Subject Property: RD-M
North: RD-M
South: R-2
East: PC
West: RD-M
Existing Land Use
Subject Property: Vacant
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
General Plan Information
a) Land Use Information
The Land Use Element of the City's current General Plan
designates the subject property for medium-high density (10-
20 du/ac) residential development. As proposed with units
the project would result in a net density of 16.4 du/ac.
While this is within the range allowed under the current
land use designation, the General Plan states that the lower
limit of the range is a suggested maximum, with a density
increase to the upper limit permitted only if certain criteria
are met. These criteria include: public improvements, on-
site amenities, slope stability and compatibility with
surrounding land uses.
b) Public F a c i 1 i t i e s
Sewer. Service
The applicant has been allocated a total of 20 sewer hookups
for the subject property, by the Leucadia County Water
District. Thus, adequate sewer will be available to serve
the proposed project.
Schools
The project is located within the San Marcos Unified School
District. School fees would be assessed at the time of
building permits if this project is approved since the
district is currently experiencing conditions of overcrowding.
Gas and Electric Service
Gas and electric service will be provided by the San Diego
Gas and Electric Company. The condominium regulations '
stipulate that gas and electric service be separately metered
for each unit.
Water Service
Water service to the proposed development will be provided
by the San Marcos Municipal Water District. Separate water
meters for each unit are also required by the condominium
regulations.
OnSite and Adjacent Public Improvements^
All necessary on-site and adjacent public improvements can
be required as per the City's public improvement ordinance,
or as conditions of approval.
Other Public Facilities
All other public facilities necessary to serve this project
will not be available concurrent with need. The
— 2—
Planning Commission may, by inclusion of an appropriate con-
dition, require that the project contribute to the costs of
such facilities according to City Council Policy No. 17.
Since the development would pay its appropriate share of the
public facility it would require, the Planning Commission
could be assured that the requirements of the Public Facilities
Element of the General Plan would be satisfied.
In addition, park-in-lieu fees could be required as a condition
of approval.
c) Other General Plan Elements
The project is consistent with all other elements of the City's
current General Plan.
Environmental Impact Information
An Environmental Impact Assessment (No. 573) has been prepared
and a Negative Declaration issued based on the following
justification:
1) The proposed development is consistent with the
of development in the immediate area, and with appli-
cable plans-. "
2) No significant landform alteration is proposed.
3) No significant flora or fauna, nor any unique or
historical resources would be adversely affected by
the development.
History and Related Cases
CT 79-3/CP-3, (Von Elten), City Council Resolution No. 5832,
denied July 3, 1979.
This proposal involved the conversion of an 80 unit apartment
complex, located on the east side of El Camino Real and north
of El Camino Real, to condominiums. The proposed conversion
was denied based on findings which included: lack of a com-
prehensive overall design; insufficient provision of improve-
ments required by the condominium regulations; and lack of
adequate setbacks and parking.
CP-6, (McMahon-O'Grady, City Council AGenda Bill No. 5905,
denied July 3, 1979.
This proposal was for the construction of 23 detached condo-
minium units, located between Almaden Lcine, Zamora Way and
Alicante Road, La Costa. The project was conditionally
approved finding that the project met all of the requirements of the
condominium regulations and would not r^uslt in any significant
— 3—
impacts to the environment or surrounding area.
Conditions of approval included: grading and drainage
modifications; provision of automatic garage door openers;
fencing restrictions; public improvement requirements; refuse
collection; landscaping requirements; and a public facilities
fee.
CT 79-7/CP-10, Fries, approved by the City Council September 18,
1979.
The City Council conditionally approved this 39 unit condominium
development, finding that it met all of the requirements of the
City's condominium regulations. Conditions of approval included:
landscaping requirements, public improvements, fencing restrictions,
grading and hydro-seeding requirements and payment of a public
facilities fee.
In addition, it should be noted that no credit was given for
on-street visitor parking along El Fuerte Street.
II, Major Planning Considerations
Does the proposed project meet all requirements and conform
to the guidelines of the City's condominium regulations
(Chapter 21.47)?
Specifically:
1) Does the proposed circulation and parking arrangement
adequately serve the project?
2) Is the proposed storage space conveniently located and
adequately designed?
3) Is the overall design of the project conducive to a good
condominium development? That is, are the buildings,
recreation amenities and other requirements of Chapter
21.47 interrelated and well designed?
III. DISCUSSION
The project involves an application for 18 condominium units,
located on 1.1 acre parcel. The units are arranged in three
buildings, located around common recreation area. Each unit
will have two levels and contain two bedrooms. Maximum height
of the building will be approximately 32 feet along Luciernaga
Street.
The current plans before the Commission are the fourth such set
of plans. Originally, the applicant had designed a 19 unit
project, which provided no on-site visitor parking. The City
Engineer found this arrangement to be unacceptable and recommended
that credit for visitor parking not be allowed along El Fuerte
Street since this street is a secondary arterial.
-4-
cIn response to these concerns, the applicant proposed revisions
to the original plans which shifted two of the units along
El Fuerte Street in and towards the center of the site in
order to provide additional on-site parking. Staff found
this alternative to be undesirable since it would cause the
units to encroach into the common recreation area, require
vehicles to back out onto El Fuerte and, from a design
standpoint, interrupt the continuity of the overall development.
Staff maintained the recommendation of denial.
As a result-, the applicant proposed another re-design of the
project. The applicant maintained the original 19 units, but
redesigned the units along El Fuerte Street in order to
provide all required tenant and visitor parking on-site.
The additional spaces were placed below the units located
along Luciernaga Street. Again staff maintained their
recommendation for denial since the plans required paving
the majority of the setback area along Luciernaga, and
elimination of the private patios for those units along
Luciernaga Street. Staff found the project to be a clear
example of overbuilding the site.
The applicant was granted a continuance in order to work
with staff and again revise the plans. Staff has found
these most recently revised plans (Exhibits B, C, D-l, D-2
and' E, dated 11/19/79) to be acceptable in meeting the
design criteria and development standards of the City's
condominium regulations (Chapter 21.47).
In order to provide the necessary on-site parking, the
applicant has reduced the number of units from 19 to 18> and
provided a small parking structure beneath several of the
units along Luciernaga Street. At 18 units, the project will
result in a net density of 16.4 du/ac. The City's Land Use
Plan designates this property for medium-high density (10-20
du/ac) residential development. The General Plan states
that a density increase beyond the suggested maximum density
(in this case, 10 du/ac) is allowable if certain criteria
are met. These criteria include: compatibility with surrounding
development, geologic stability of site; adequate public
facilities and sufficient on-site amenitites.
Staff has found that the topography and geology of the site
can safely accomodate the project as proposed, and that the
project is consistent with the nature of the surrounding
developments. In addition, staff believes that with the
attached conditions, adequate public facilites and on-site
amenities will be provided and that the project should
qualify for a density increase beyond the suggested maximum.
One of the on-site amenities staff has considered to be
important in this particular case is visitor parking.
Section 21.47.130(2) of the condominium regulations require
that the project provide two spaces per unit, in addition to
seven visitor spaces (a total of 43 spaces). As revised,
— 5 —
the plans show a total of 44 on-site spaces, thus exceeding
the parking requirements. In addition some on-street parking
is available along Luciernaga Street. Further, by developing
a parking structure beneath the units along Luciernaga, the
number of driveways and amount of paving is reduced, thus
much of the setback area along this street may be landscaped.
Section 21.47.110 of the condominium regulations discuss
certain design criteria which must be met by all condominium
projects. Specifically, this section states that the overall
plan shall be comprehensive, embracing land, building,
landscaping and their interrelationships. Staff believes
that this criteria has been met, since the recreation area
is centrally located to all units and is served by pedestrian
walkways which enhance the interrelationships between the
dwellings and other features of the project. Also, the
revised plans maintain the private patios for each unit
which were originally proposed.
With regard to the open recreation area, Section 21.47.130(8)
states that a minimum of 200 sq. ft. of open recreation area
be provided per dwelling unit. By counting only the common
recreation area, and not the private patios, the project
exceeds this requirement by approximately 75 sq. ft. per
unit.
Another development standard affecting all condominium
projects (Section 21.47.130(6)) specifies that 480 cu. ft.
of storage space shall be provided per unit. The project
has met and, in some cases, exceeded this requirement by
providing storage space within the parking garages.
A refuse container is proposed at the western end of the
driveway which serves the majority of,the parking garages.
Staff has found this location to be undesirable since its
location interferes with the turnaround for the autos parked
at the end of the driveway. Staff has placed a condition of
approval on the project, requiring this container to be
relocated in order to provide the necessary turnaround.
A number of recent condominium proposals have raised concerns
regarding building setbacks off of the private driveways.
Staff has carefully reviewed the proposed project and has
found it to have met all of the required setbacks as specified
by the condominium regulations.
Finally, each unit will have individual laundry facilities,
in addition to a common laundry facility near the recreation
area. Also, all utilities (including water, gas and electric)
will be individually metered for each unit.
IV. Re'c oinme n d a t i o n
It is recommended that the Planning Commission forward a
recommendation of approval of CT 79-12/CP-16 to the City
Council based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions.
-6-
Findings
1. The project is consistent with the City's current
General Plan since:
a) The project falls within the density range specified
for the site and as indicated on the Land Use
Element of the General Plan;
b) The project qualifies for a density increase beyond
the suggested maximum since the topography and
geology of the site can safely accommodate the
proposed density and sufficient on-site amenities,
, including visitor parking, landscaping and open
recreation area, have been provided.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density
of the development since the site is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate residential development at the
proposed density and still meet all the requirements of
Chapter 21.47 of the City's zone code.
3. The project is consistent with all City public facility
policies and ordinances since:
A. The applicant is on the Inacadia County Water
District's sewer allocation list, and sufficient
sewer hookups have been reserved for the project.
B. The Planning Commission finds that sewer service
is not available for this development as of the
date of this approval. However, sewer service may
be available in the future. The Planning Commission
has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to
this condominium permit and tentative subdivision
map, insured that the final map will not be approved
unless the City Council finds that sewer service
is available to serve the project. In addition,
the Planning Commission has added a condition that
; a note shall be placed on the final map that
building permits may not be issued for the condominium
project unless the City Engineer determines that
. sewer service is available. Since the final map
cannot be approved unless sewer service is available,
the'building cannot occur within the project
unless sewer service remains available, the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of
the public facilities element of the General Plan
have been met insofar as they apply to sewer
service for this condominium permit and tentative
map approval.
C. School fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding
are required at the time of bulding permits pursuant
to Chapter 21.55 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
-7-
c
D. Water service will be provided by the San Marcos
Municipal Water District, and the applicant is
required to comply with their rules and regulations.
E. Gas and electric service will be provided by San
Diego Gas and Electric.
F. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of
approval.
G. All necessary public improvements have been either
provided or will be required as conditions of
approval.
. H. At this time, the Planning Commisison is not
;) prepared to find that all other public facilities
necessary to serve the project will be available
concurrent with need. The Planning Commission
has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition,
required that the project contribute to the costs
of such facilities. Since the development will
pay its proportionate share of the public
facilities which it will require, the Planning
Commission .is satisfied that the requirements of
the public facilities element of the General Plan
have been satisfied.
4. The design of the project and all required improvements
will not cause any significant environmental impacts,
and a Declaration of Negative Environemtnal Impact has
been issued, based on the justification that:
A. The proposed development is consistent with the
trend of development in the immediate area, and
with applicable plans.
B. No significant landform alteration is proposed.
C. No significant flora or fauna, nor any unique or
historical resources would be adversely affected
by the development.
5. The proposed condominium project meets the criteria of
Chapter 21.47 (condominiums) since:
A. The condominiums meet the design criteria of
Chapter 21.47.110 since the overall plan is
comprehensive embracing land, building, landscaping
and their relationships, the driveways are not
dominant features, and sufficient circulation and
on-site amenities are provided.
B, Storage space, laundry facilities, open recreation
areas, parking facilities, refuse areas, separate
utilities and other requrements of Section 21.47.130
have been met or will be made conditions of approval,
-8-
c
Conditions"
1. This approval is granted for that portion of land
described in the application CT 79-12/CP-16, and development
shall occur substantially as indicated on Exhibit A,
dated August 6, 1979, and Exhibits B, C, D-l, D-2 & E
dated November 19, 1979, (on file in the Planning
Department), except for modifications required herein.
2. The applicant shall prepare a reproducible copy of the
final condominium site plan incorporating all requirements
of the condominium permit approval, and shall be subject
to the approval of the Planning. Director. In addition,
the applicant shall submit for the Planning Director's
approval final building elevations.
3. The applicant shall comply with all rules and regulations
of the respective sewer and water districts regarding
water and sewer service to the subject property.
4. The applicant will provide school fees to mitigate
conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit
applications. These fees shall be based on the fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit ap-
plication.
5. This subdivision and condominium plan is approved upon
the express condition that the final map shall not be
approved unless the City Council finds, as of the time
of such approval, that sewer service is available to
serve- the subdivision.
6. This subdivision condominium plan is approved upon the
express condition that building or grading permits will
not be issued for development of the subject property
unless the City Engineer determines that such sewer
facilities are available at the time of application for
such permits and will continue to be available until
time of occupancy. If the City Engineer determines
that sewer facilities are not available, building
permits will not be issued.
7. In order to provide for fire protection during the con-
struction period, the applicant shall maintain passable
vehicular access to all buildings. In addition adequate
fire hydrants and/or off site, stand pipes with required
fire flows shall be installed on and/or off site, as
recommended by the Fire Chief or his designee.
8. Street trees of a variety approved by the Parks and
Recreation Department shall be installed to City specifications
at 40 foot intervals along all public street frontages.
—9 —
C
9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant
shall pay a public facility fee as established in City
Council Policy No. 17. This approval is expressly
conditioned that the applicant shall enter into a
secured agreement with the City for the payment of this
fee prior to the approval of the resolution for this
project by the Planning Commission.
10. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees prior to the
recordation of the final map.
11. The applicant shall agree to modify the proposed landscape
plan and substitute drought tolerant plant species for
the following plants: Erythrina Capfra; Tupidanthus
Calyptratus; and Gardenia Jasminoides. These changes
shall be noted on the final condominium site plan and
approved by the Planning Director.
12. The developer shall receive the approval of the City
Engineer for a site grading plan and obtain a grading
permit prior to any construction being performed within
the project site.
13. The proposed refuse container shall be recorded to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The revised location
shall be indicated on the final condominium site plan.
Exhibits
Location Map
Exhibit "A" dated August 6, 1979 '
Exhibits B, C, D-l, D-2, and E dated November 19, 1979
BM:ar
- 11/21/79
-10-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1570
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN
18 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF EL FUERTE AND LUCIERNAGA
STREETS, LA COSTA.
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
CT 79-12/CP-16
Mark Malter
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to
wit:
Lots 400 and 401 of La Costa Meadows, Unit No. 2
County of San Diego, according to Map No. 6905
filed April 21, 1971
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as .provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, this project has been processed through environ-
mental review as required in Title 19, the Environmental
Protection Ordinance.- An Environmental Impact Assessment
(No. 573) has been prepared and a Negative Declaration issued
based on the following justifications:
1. The proposed development is consistent with the development
in the immediate area, and with applicable plans.
2. No significant landform alteration is proposed.
3. No significant flora or fauna, nor any unique or historical
resources would be adversely affected by the development.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on November 28, 1979
hold a duly noticed, public hearing as prescribed by law to
consider said request; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit
and found the following facts and reasons to exist:
Bindings
1. The project is consistent with the City's current General
Plan since:
A. The project falls within the density range specified
for the site and as indicated on the Land Use
Element of the Genral Plan;
B. The project qualifies for a density increase beyond
the suggested maximum since the topography and
geology of the site can safely accommodate the proposed
density and sifficient on-site amenities, including
visitor parking, landscaping and open recreation
area, have been provided.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density
of the development since the site is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate residential development at the
proposed density and still meet all the requirements of
Chapter 21.47 of the City's zone code.
3. The project is consistent with all City public facility
policies and ordinances since:
A. The applicant is on the Lucadia County Water
District's sewer allocation list, and sufficient
sewer hookups have been reserved for the project.
B. The Planning Commission finds that sewer service
is not available for this development as of the
date of this approval. However, sewer service may
be available in the future. The Planning Commission
has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to
this condominium permit and tentative subdivision
map, insured that the final map will not be approved
unless the City Council finds that sewer service
is available to serve the project. In addition,
the Planning Commission has added a condition that
a note shall be placed on the final map that
building permits may not be issued for the condominium
project unless the City Engineer determines that
sewer service is available. Since the final map
cannot be approved unless sewer service is available,
the building cannot occur within the project
.2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
unless sewer service remains available, the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of
the public facilities element of the General Plan
have been met insofar as they apply to sewer
service for this condominium permit and tentative
map approval.
C. School fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding
are required at the time of building permits
pursuant to Chapter 21.55 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code.
D. Water service will be provided by the San Marcos
Municipal Water District, and the applicant is
required to comply with their rules and regulations.
E. Gas and electric service will be provided by San
Diego Gas and Electric.
F. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of
approval.
G. All necessary public improvements have been either
provided or will be required as conditions of
approval.
H. All other public facilities necessary to serve
the project will not be available concurrent
with need. The Planning Commission has, by
inclusion of an appropriate condition, required
that the project contribute to the costs of such
facilities. Since the development will pay its
proportionate share of the public facilities which
it will require, the Planning Commission is
satisfied that the requirements of the public
facilities element of the General Plan have been
satisfied.
The design of the project and all required improvements
will not cause any significant environmental impacts,
and a Declaration of Negative Environemtnal Impact has
been issued for the project.'
The proposed condominium project meets the criteria of
Chapter 21.47 (condominiums) since:
A. The condominiums meet the design criteria of
chapter 21.47.110 since the overall plan is
comprehensive, embracing land, building, land-
scaping, and their relationships, the driveways
are not dominant features, and sufficient circu-
lation and on-site amenities are provided.
.3
B. Storage space, laundry facilities, open recreation
areas, parking facilities, refuse areas, separate
utilities and other requrements of Section 21.47.130
have been met or will be made conditions of approval.
3 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the following
4 vote, recommended approval of CT 79-12/CP-16, subject to
5 certain conditions:
6
7
8
9
10
11 herein.
12
13
14
15
17
18
22
23
24
25
26
. 27
28
Conditions
1. This approval is granted for that portion of land
described in the application CT 79-12/CP-16, and
development shall occur substantially as indicated on
CT 79-12/CP-16 Exhibit A, dated August 6, 1979, and
Exhibits B, C, D-l, D-2 & E, dated November 19, 1979,
(on file in the Planning Department and incorporated
herein by reference), except for modifications required
2. The applicant shall prepare a reproducible copy of the
final condominium site plan'incorporating all requirements
of the condominium permit approval, and shall bei subject
to the approval of the Planning Director. In addition,
the applicant shall submit for the Planning Director's
approval final building elevations.
16 3. The applicant shall comply with all rules and regulations
of the respective sewer and water districts regarding
water and sewer service to the subject property.
4.' The applicant will provide school fees to mitigate
]_9 conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit
applications. These fees shall be based on the fee
20 schedule in effect at the time of building permit ap-
plication.
21 5. This subdivision and condominium plan is approved upon
the express condition that the final map shall not be
approved unless the City Council finds, as of the time
of such approval, that sewer service is available to
serve the subdivision.
6. This subdivision condominium plan is approved upon the
express condition that building or grading permits will
not be issued for development of the subject property
unless the City Engineer determines that such sewer
facilities are available at the time of application for
such permits and will continue to be available until '
time of occupancy. If the City Engineer determines
that sewer facilities are not available, building
permits will not be issued.
.4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7. In order to provide for fire protection during the con-
struction period, the applicant shall maintain passable
vehicular access to all buildings. In addition adequate
fire hydrants and/or off site, stand pipes with required
fire flows shall be installed on and/or off site, as
recommended by the Fire Chief or his designee.
8. Street trees of a variety approved by the Parks and
Recreation Department shall be installed to City
specifications at 40 foot intervals along all public
street frontages.
9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant
shall pay a public facility fee as established in City
Council Policy No. 17. This approval is expressly
conditioned that the applicant shall enter into a
secured agreement with the City for the payment of this
fee prior to the approval of the resolution for this
project by the Planning Commission.
10. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees prior to the
recordation of the final map.
11. The applicant shall agree to modify the proposed landscape
plan and substitute drought tolerant plant species for
the following plants: Erythrina Capfra; Tupidanthus
Calyptratus; and Gardenia Jasminoides. These changes
shall be noted on the final condominium site plan and
approved by the Planning Director.
12. The developer shall receive-the approval of the City
Engineer for a site grading plan and obtain a grading
permit prior to any construction being performed within
the project site.
13. The proposed refuse container shall be relocated adjacent
to the carports as approved by .the City Engineer. The
revised location shall be indicated on the final
condominium site plan.
AYES: Schick, Rombotis, Jose, Leeds, Marcus,
Friestedt, Larson
NOES: None
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the foregoing
recitations are true and correct.
ATTEST:
EDWIN S. SCHICK, JR. Chairman
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary
cr TV is/ CP-
HALTED
CASE NO .Of 73 - \'(LiC?- \ f.ff Date Rec'c
Description of Regpest
DCC Date; \n/7*]~~!c) PC Date
.^-.CQH'QO .PERMIT"
Address or Location of Request :
^ EL.
LUClEF^HA^A. .pr
Applicant:
Engr. or Arch. LVKO-r? £
Brief Legal; UTT^o -A.OO A MT=Ar>OVAJ>^7 Ur4rr^\O.g.-./".iOUNnrV DP"
Assessor Book:
General Plan Land Use Description:p,
Existing Zone:
Acres:
Paqe:Parcel;
MED\UM-Ml^t4
No. of Lota:
Proposed Zone ; FSD" M
DlPs iq
School District;
Water District:
DU/Acre
LlK\iFtgP fr
Sanitation District:
Coanh. Pormit Area :
If after the information you have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined
'•that further informatit~J<is required, you will be so
APPLICANT:J Mark M. Malter Owner
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
926 S. Citrus Ave. Los Angeles, Calif. 9003^ _ _____
Business Address
AGENT:
MEMBERS:
2.1? - Q31. -
Telephone Number
Lykos & Goldhammer Arch.
Name
566 Mission Vallley Center West ' San Diego, Calif. 92108
Business Address „.., „or Dye Surveying Inc. 3564 Groye^St.
^^r~, ^o.. r, Lemon Grove. Calif.- 297 - 2817
Telephone Number
Name (individual, partner, joint
venture., corporation, syndication)
Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number • Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach pore shee s if necessary)
I/We declare under penalty of perjur/ t.;;at tr.-; i- f^-rn.a'cic ' contained .in this dis-
closure is true and correct and that it will rem .ui.true _nd correct and may be
relied upon as being true and correct until amcr. cd.
Applicant
Owner
Agent, Owner, Partner