Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-02-19; City Council; 6178; Report from sewer committeeCITY OF CARLSBAD -I_ AC;Ei"DA BILL NO. (b / 7f ATE : February 19, 1980 , DEPARTMENT: City Manager Initial: Dept . Hd . C, Atty. C. Mgr, Sub] ect : REPORT FROM SEWER COMMITTEE - DISCRETIONARY ALLOCATIONS Statement of the Matter The sewer committee met on February 14, 1980 and reviewed applications for allocation of discretionary permits. The attached report reflects the recommendations of the committee. Exhibit ~~ ~~ Report from sewer committee dated 2-15-80 Recommendation Approval of allocations as recommended by the committee Council Action: 2-19-80 Council accepted the recommendations 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the subcommittee as contained in their report dated February 15, 1930, and directed the attorney prepare the necessary documents to revise the allocation system and make the requested allocations. Council directed that half of all reclaimed sewer go into a discretionary category for Council allocation. Council directed that the other half of all reclaimed sewer go into a category for random drawing to include those projects which were passed over in Phase I and Phase I1 allocations, and those who have all discretionary approvals and have applied one time. r DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1980 c TO : CITY COUNCIL FROM: SEWER COMMITTEE Councilwoman Casler and Councilman Skotnicki SEWER PERMIT ALLOCATIONS The City now has available the following unallocated sewer permits: Discretionary Redevelopment Area Contingency Public Facilities 212 80 20 50 In addition, 19 projects representing 128 EDU's have failed to meet required deadlines and an additional 50 EDU's may be forfeited in March. The Council Sewer Committee has reviewed 8 requests totaling 345.6 EDU's. Requests for Allocation from Discretionary Reserve: A. B. C. 'D . -,E. - F. -G. -. H. Pea Soup Andersen 180 EDU's Sunset Pacific 48 EDU's Highland Company 52 EDU's Pi0 Pic0 North 5.6 EDU's Torrey Enterprises 9 EDU's Cape Bristol Condominium Project 16 EDU's Rick Engineering Senior Housing 32 EDU's Republic Tool 3 EDU's Total 345.6 EDU's The committee applied the attached guidelines for allocation of sewer permits and recommends approval of the request of: Pea Soup Andersen Sunset Pacific 180 EDU's 48 EDU's The reason for favoring Pea Soup Andersen are: -- Annual sales tax revenues of $85,000 -- Annual room tax revenues of $57,000 -- Employment of 350 people The reason for favoring Sunset Pacific is: -- Completion of the missing link in Tamarack Road between Skyline Road and El Camino Real which will alleviate traffic congestion and provide additional east-west access between El Camino and downtown. This allocation should be conditioned on the bonding of an agreement by developer to construct Tamarack Road. Pqge 2 February 15, 1980 ': Sewer Permit Allocations In addition, the Sewer Committee recommends that the Council make a commitment to Sunset Pacific to allocate an additional 86 sewer permits when and if the Lake Calavera Hills satellite sewer plant becomes available. Assurances conditioned upon: 1) Completion of Tamarack to satisfaction of City Council; 2) The developer will acquire no rights to complete the project. The project will be subject to all applicable laws and ordinances at the time of final map or building permits; 3) That the action will not establish a precedent for later Council decisions relating to the Calavera plant; 4) That Council will have some discretion to determine when sewer is available from the Calavera plant. These two allocations total 228 EDU's. It is proposed that 212 EDU's be allocated from the Discretionary Reserve and 16 from the Contingency Reserve. Because of the forfeiture of permits allocated in Phase I1 it is anticipated that as many as 175 EDU's may become available in April which would allow the Contingency Category to be repaid. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Allocate 180 sewer permits to Pea Soup Andersen, subject to filing application for zoning/planning approvals within 90 days. 2. Allocate 48 sewer permits to Sunset Pacific Tract 76-15, subject to filing final subdivision map within 90 days and taking out building permits within 45 days after approval of final map. 3. Provide a commitment to Sunset Pacific to allocate an additional 86 sewer permits when and if the Lake Calavera Hills satellite sewer plant capacity becomes available, subject to appropriate discretionary actions of the City Council at the time. 4. Instruct City Engineer to notify those Phase I1 allottees who fail to meet deadlines and recommend appropriate action to the Council. 5. Direct the Council Sewer Committee to review appeals, if any, from those allottees who fail to meet deadlines and recommend appro- priate action to the Council. 6. Create two allocation procedures for additional sewer permits which become available in the immediate future: a) Random Drawing. To allocate half of forfeited permits to those applicants who were passed over in both Phase I and Phase I1 allocations (9 applicants, 114 EDU's) b) Discretionary. To allocate other available permits to new applicants. .- / \ Page 3 Sewer Permit Allocations <. February 15, 1980 7. Approve as a guideline the attached policy statement governing allocations from the discretionary and Random Drawing Category. 8. Request the sewer committee to make recommendations for sewer allocations which will become available because of expansion of Encina plant and construction of satellite plants. MARY H. CASLER Councilwoman Atts. - Sewer Permit Allocation Guidelines AN THO^ J. SKOTNICKI Councilman 8 applications Memo to City Manager from City Engineer, 2-15-80 c CITY OF CARLSBAD SEWER PERMIT ALLOCATION GUIDELINES - DISCRETIONARY CATEGORY 1t:shall be the policy of the City Council to allocate limited sewer system capacity to those projects which produce maximum benefit to the City as a whole. When allocating permits from discretionary reserves "maximum benefit" will be construed to mean one or more of the following benefits: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Increases sales tax revenues. Increases transient occupancy taxes. Improves the employment base significantly with emphasis on those skills available or that can be made available in the Carlsbad area. Makes a significant contribution to the attainment of downtown redevelopment objectives. Provides low and moderate income housing in the infill areas. This benefit attains even greater significance when that housing is located in the old downtown business district or meets the unique requirements of senior citizens. modular units, are included in this category of housing. Manufactured housing, mobile-or Adds to the rental housing stock in the infill area (apartments) when agreements can be reached to preclude condominium conversion. Rental unit construction is particularly desirable in the redevelop- ment area. Improves traffic circulation by the completion of important segments of major streets in the infill area or completes other major capital improvement projects in the infill area. Hardship circumstances will not be considered. Applications for projects which would require significant expenditure for public service and for facilities are not desired. Council retains for itself the widest latitude in determining how benefits are calculated and projects are prioritized. RANDOM DRAWING CATEGORY It shall be the policy of the Council to give preferential treatment to those projects which did not receive sewer permits during both the Phase I and Phase I1 allocations. Drawings shall be made for award of sewer permits as additional allocations become available. The Random Drawing Category shall be replenished from time to time by assigning half of the permits forfeited by applicants who do not meet the time deadlines imposed by the Phase I1 allocations. The remaining half of the forfeited permits shall be placed in the Discretionary Category. The Council reserves the right to establish additional or modified policies for allocating sewer capacity which may become available because of Encina nlant exDansion or annroval of satellite nlants. 2/19/80 c ;MEMORANDUM TO : FROM: DATE : City Manager City Engineer February 15, 1980 SUBJECT: UNSUCCESSFUL DUAL APPLICANTS FOR SEWER ALLOCATIONS The fol 1 owing are appl i cants who have unsuccessful ly submitted appl ications for sewer allocations in both the First and Second Phase Sewer Allocation System. TOTAL Applicant Location EDUs I PSAS 2 PSAS EDUs Haas 1 W/S Park btwn. 3 M1 Cove & Marina M7 3- (207-1 50-25) Haasl Corner of Park & Cove 3 M2 M6 3 Moore/ Peacoc k/ E/S Li ncol n btwn. - M6 for 9 EDUs M22 for 16 EDUs (207-1 50-24) Tiberio Pine & Walnut M6A for 6 EDUs 16 ( 204-060-01 ) Tamarack Shores/ N/S Tamarack btwn. 27 M8 M60 Aftergut/Hirsch E & W Jefferson 27 (204-280-9,11,12, 13.24 & 25) Sun Pac West/ E/W Corner Pine & - M17 for M48 for 20 EDUs Guagl iardo/ Washington 21 EDUs 20 Felkins/Guagliardo/ S/S Chestnut btwn. 4-Des i gn/Regan ( 204-062-04) - M63 for 15 EDUs M18 for ._ - __ - --&Des i gn Garfield & Washngton 12 EDUs 15 (204-1 50-31 Thayer/Cape E/S Cove btwn. 16 M19 M4 16 Bristol/CT72-16/ Park & Cove (1 etter dated 2/7/80) Guagliardo Libuse (207-1 50-84) Moore/4-Design/ W/S Cove btwn. 3 M2 1 M7 1 3 Weber/Borden S/S Juniper btwn. - M23 for 6 EDUs M21 for 11 EDUs (204-240-33) __ - Park & End of Cove (207-1 50-04) Garfield & RR 11 Of the foregoing applicants, the following have been allocated EDUs for other projects. Haasl I PSAS #M3 2 EDUs 4599 Cove Haasl 1 PSAS #M4 2 EDUs 4531 Cove Haasl 1 PSAS #M5 2 EDUs 4533 Cove 2PSAS #S55 1 EDU W/S Donna btwn. Basswood & Gayle $/& Ci ty EFP Engineer LE:JNE:mmt &EMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF CAFUSBAD 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Presented for: Vincent B. Evans, President Pea Soup Andersen's Restaurant and Inn Buellton, California 93427 Presented by: John C. White Coldwell Banker Company 3088 Pi0 Pic0 Drive Carlsbad, CA. 92002 L. Bruce Stallard Realtor 1222 India Street San Diego, CA. 92101 .- A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Pea Soup Andersen's Restaurant and Inn proposes to develop a major commercial tourist complex on 12.3 acres at the northeast quadrant of Interstate 5 and Palomar Airport Road in the City of Carlsbad. The property is currently owned by Mr. Paul Ecke and street improvements have been completed by Mr, Ecke from the south side of Car Country to Palomar Airport Road. The project will consist of a 600 seat Pea Soup Andersen's Restaurant including banquet rooms, a bakery shop, a wine tasting cellar, a country store, a 125 seat Danish Inn Gourmet Restaurant, a 100 room motel complex and Service Center including a gasoline station and convenience store. Andersen's was founded in Solvang in 1924 and has become a well-established enterprise with a national reputation for excellent food and friendly service. Three facilties are currently owned and operated by Andersen's including the most well-known location in Buellton, California, one in Mammoth Lakes and the newest facility in Santa Nella, California, Pea Soup Andersen's takes great pride in not only serving the traveling public but also the communities in which their facilities are located, It is the desire of Andersen's to develop a similar relationship with the City of Carlsbad. . .* . 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. MAJOR ADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSED PEa SOUP ANDERSEN'S COMPLEX TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Tourist business: Andersen's has established a reputation for bringing to a community the type of business so widely sought after today, and additionally generates a high percentage of return business. Restaurant sales: projected to be $4.5 million the first year of operation; of which $4 million would he subject to sales tax or approximately $40,000 would accrue to the City of Carlsbad. Motel sales: forecast to be $958,000 the first year of operation based upon an occupancy rate of 75% at a room average of $35.00 per night. Bed tax (6% in City) would generate $57,480 of revenue to the City of Carlsbad. Gasoline sales: Service Center sales are projected to be 3.75 million the first year and the convenience store is projected to be $800,000 the first year. Total sales tax accruing to the City would be $45,500. Real Estate taxes: estimated cost of construction is pro- jected to be $4 million with land valued at $2 million for a total project value of $6 million. Appropriate real estate taxes will be assessed. Employment: Pea Soup Andersen's Carlsbad would provide new jobs for approximately 350 people with a total annual payroll exceeding $2.5 million. As a matter of policy, Andersen's hires local people for their operation. Civic affairs: Andersen's takes pride in serving the com- munities where their restaurants are located. Participation in many of the local civic projects has been a long standing policy. donated annually. Sponsorships include the Children's Home Society, Santa Ynez Valley Historical Society, Buellton Business Associations, Santa Ynez Hospital Fund, Santa Nella Hospital Fund, United Way, and many others. Over $100,000 has been generated by banquets with the total proceeds going to various local organizations. Benefits for numerous community organizations are .. 8. Banquet facilities: Andersen's complex will provide banquet facilities for over 300 persons. In addition, the restaurant design provides excellent flexibility to accommodate more than one group at a time. 9. Indirect benefits: in excess of $10 million of sales would be generated from Andersen's operations each year. These are dollars which would otherwise have been spent in other communities since Andersen's is not generally in competition with existing business. Andersen's policy is to establish banking relationships as well as buying relationships in the local community. Therefore, many of the above mentioned sales dollars would flow into the local economy. I REQUEST FOR SEWER ALLOCATION FROM THE CITY'S DISCRETIONARY CATEGORY Since we were unable to qualify for sewer capacity under the City's second phase sewer allocation, we respectfully request that our requirement for 180 EDU's be granted by the City Council from the discretionary category. After meetings with Les Evans, City Engineer, our total request is summarized below: Building 600 seat restaurant 1.25 seat restaurant 100 unit motel service station convenience store EDU' s Required 88.38 20.53 60.00 3.00 .44 contingency 172.35 7.65 180.00 *Our formal request to be considered for the Council meeting on February 5, 1980 was submitted by letter on January 18, 1980. Januar!: 23, 2980 ,' t .. 4 .. I .' .. , .. ... .. .. I. Vear Councilperson: .. forma.lly requestfng that at the Regularly Scheduled Council EIeeting 03 E'ebriiary 5, 2980, we be considered for allocation of a portion of the City's.remaininy sewer capcity. rri? did ~ot apply fox any of the available capacity under the first two n3locatiq:is systems because of the maximum amount of units allowed to any sipg2e project. Pa.int.fs a' 134 udt PUD. are required to be 'conpplcked with the first phase of construction, ' thttrccbp making'it v.irtual.Iy .inpossible fqr us to develop without a schedble for compl.et:iori of all ,ronstruc'iiol;. nccordinyly , we are renuesting that the Council find that sewer service is now availnble to Tract 76-15 in crdcr that we may Finzll our tentative map and proceed with the c?evelopimr,t of our f-irst: unit of 48 patio homes. We are further requesting assurances that tho remaining 85 bonies would be allowed. to be started w1~rl.n additimal capaci t~ becorms avail ab2 e. .. 'I . As the owners of Tract 76-15, known as Palisades Point, rue are .. Palisades All. of ths grading and siibdivision inprovemnt *. .. .. . .. . .. .. . , '' In order to assist '902 .in your evaluation of our request, listed belocr ir: i?n approxiniate developmenL"a1 schedrile for the purpose of showing just whm our clevelopmerit would have an impact on sewer capacity: . ' .' . . .. ... .. . I .. *. Final. EJap review. 6i Plan Check ' CGmpletion of First 48 Homes Complction of the final 27 '(rones As yo'u are aware, Palisades Paink is in the Lake.Cs2averzi Hills Should the 4 months €rom Approvzl Grading di SubdivAsion ~mpxovements,complete 9 . 'I I1 P 14 .. .Compiet.l:on of the next SS IIwtces . 18, " 11 - 24' 'tr 0 I? ., I' 1I 19 ... .. I. .. . .. . .. drainage basin and is designed. into thcir s9telite system. Council approve oiir request for &ewer 'allocation it would appear. from the schedde above and the apparent pxogrc:ss of thc Lake Calovera Hills SatcJite Plant that: by :the time our firs!: horrses are complel-cd they could be scwered throiigh the C'ii.1;ivez-a Plant: aiid not have any .inp;icl: on the City's rc>rna.iriiny cnpiic.i ty from Ericina. rating of ttic L;'ncinn P.tant: prior to t~ic completion OF our first: unit of homes, is very likely. Furt-i,crmore, it is our undcrstandin9 that the re- .. " Tho/ January 23, 1980 c c Page 2 of 2 Tk constructfon of Tamarack 6etwf?,?n El Camiiio Real and Skyline Drive has been held up. fox three years. request rdll a.120~ us to complete this street and eliminate the datiycrs that now exist to public and priwte pxopertg. Your approval of our We hope you wXll approve this request €or sewer allocation for QUX first 48 houses and at the szme time assure us that when additfonal capacity becomes available either from the re-rating of the Encina PJant or as a result of the conipZetion of the Ldce Calavera Sills Satelite Plant that we will be allocated the balance of our necessary sewer capacity to complete this project. .. . Michael IC. Roston SUNSET PACIFIC I. .. * '. . .. . . .. 34 . c., . I' TO : City Ibnager FRGM : DATE : January 25, 198G City Engineer -LL3 / ' SURJECT: REQUEST FOR ALLOCATION 02' SEWER CAPACITY FRON rrm cou:ir,i~, RESERVE By memorandum or" August 2E! ,, 1.979, the Sewer Cc;rruni.ttee recommr:nd.cd to irhe City Council th3.t 1000 EDUs of the 1300 XDUs available be allocatcd and the remaining 300 EDUs be 1;cld in reserve. The Council adopted .a process for allocating 1000 EDUs on Sep-teii~I~z 18 3.9 7 3 : On November 20 1979, Oak Comnunications requested 2nd was graiitec? 55 EDUs from the Coui-lcil reserve. Oil JanyaFy 2, 1.980, the Ccunci.3. approved the allocation of 3. 7 3 EDUs to the Aguacslture Fmm on the AGua !ledionth %cjcon. The CourIci.I Flic?s received a request for sewer :.~1.10catiori from kh.e remii:?ng reserve fron SUiL'SGT PACIFIC. Sunset Pacific did n~t. aii~1 y for a sewer allccztior, in the Phase 11 AZlocatio1-1 System h~ra~~1:~c 95 the 1imS:;:~stj.on on the nuinher of permits which could be a~pl.5.ed for. Tlic developer lis requesting 48 EDUs for the first phase of a :I-34 unit. . PUD. A tcntativc tract map has been approved.for this dcvci.opmcnt. Tract 76-15 is within the J;al:e Calavera Hills Reclamr-itic>n. Plalit. ' drainage basin arid coilld evz!itually be served by that. facj.:L!-ty. Should the d~eloper ' s request be approved Tamarack &veiiue would be extended to El Caniino Real. .. LE : nimt / Palisades. 'w February 2, 1980. Frank Aleshire Dear Mr, Aleshire: We have just been informed that the Council, in its meet- ing of February Tth, will consider giving its approval for proceeding with the development of the area to the west of our complex; to be known as Palisades Point. We are much in favor of this permission being granted, This area has been an eyesore ever since work was stopped. In addition, each rainfall creates a hazardous condition, resulting from the flow of silt, You may be aware of the substantial cost to the City for removing earth from the sewers and blocked drainage lines, as well as major and minor repairs to the street surfaces. We do not have sufficient time to poll our Homeowners in regard to Mr, Michael Roston, the developer. However the Board does vdh to express our satisfaction with his performance in regard to the flcommon areas". In particular, Mr. Roston has continued to assume responsibility for the El Camino Real slopes, an area that has experienced many costly landslides. F Enclosure: Copy for Mayor Ronald Packard. Carlsbad Palisades Homeowners As so c iation The LOOMIS COMPANY, 2122 El Camino Real, Oceanside, California 92054 DATE: February 7* 1980 LIBUSE DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH 1320 Grand Avenue Suite 15 San Marcos California 92069 (714) 744-3544 TO: Honorable Mayor Packard and Members of the City Council FHOMt Cape Bristol Condominium Project c/o Yz. Penn Thayer 9184. Coast Highway, Suite A Dana Point, California 92629 SUBJECT: Wi3 BRISTOL COI~~KIi~IU~ PaOaCT, CARISBAD TRACT 30. 72-16. PROPOSED 16 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVEIIUP- PdibT, 4525 COVZ DRIVE, BiiISTOL COVd, CARLSBAD, CA, In regard to the proposed Third Sewer Allocation under the Second Phase Sewer Allocation Program, the owners of the Cape Bristol Condominium project respectfully request that the proposed 16-unit condominium project be given priority in your consideration of projects which will be allocated sewer hook-ups out of t'ne City's remaining 200 EDUS. Priority is being requested based on the long history of governmental permit processing accomplished on the project and the worth of the project to the City of Carlsbad and the consumer. As evidenced in the attached July 23, 1979 Memo to the City Council in regard to the First Allocation under the Second Phase Sewer Allocation Program, the governmental permit processing requirements for the development of the Cape Bristol Condominium project have been in process since Fay 1972; Final Nap iio. 72-16 was recorded in August 1973. The project has also received two extensions of the second Coastal Permit issued for the project in December 1977( see attached Exhibit# 1). Additionally, the project has qualified under both the Plarch 1978 Second Icevision to the First Phase Sewer Allocation System and the December 1979 Second Phase Sewer Allocation System( see Exhibits# 2 and 3). Considerable time and money has been expended, to date, by both the owners of Cape Bristol and the City of Carlsbad for the development of the project. Because a minimum of governmental processing requiremerits remain, the City's costs to provide 16 additional units of varied housing ownership opportunities in the infill area of the City will be minimal compared to newly proposed condominium projects. Also, the sooner the owners are able to build the proposed units, the moreaffordable the housing units will be for the consumer due to the minimization of the holding costs and of the ever increasing construction costs. Thank you for yowr consideration of this matter. STATE r Of CALIFORNIA-CALIFORNIA ------- C\ JAL COMMISSION EDMUND G. BROWN JR , Governor SAb DlfGO COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION 6154 MISSION GORGE ROAD, SUITE 220 SAN DIEG0,CALIFORNIA 92120 - TEL. (7141 280-6992 Janis Libuse 6539 Camino Del Parque Carlsbad, CA 92008 On November 16, 1979 , the San Diego Coast Re- gional Commission approved your request for extension of the starting construction date for your permit No. F6307-E Length of the extension granted is 12 months from the original expiration date of your permit, or from the ex- piration date of a previously approved extension request. If you have any questions on this, please contact our office. Very truly xw Tom Crandall Executive Director TC: ! 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. Tota.3. Points Tic Breaker 1. 2. 3. ..-__I- (1’ & R) Comacnts ..-- Graiid ’~’~tal ation ' ition (a) Infill Area h* C'J (b)' other - c,.y EW Limits: 1,imj.t. .-: -= L; - - Septic (yes or no) /-.<I Jested (33MlEnts -- Lie .Costs 0 . Qualifies: ~3es oi no) ". . .. e Response Tim - Points: 2' 4' /I tance to Schools " ' Poirrtr;: :. Transportation -I .. Points : 4 to ation within the CmrrmiQ Points : ' .ti> ipletion of Public Facilities .. Points : 0 .. ~ler Use Calculation I .. -q : a. .. * Points: t .. &le Sales, calculation - Points : i ilding Valuation, Calculatiun .. Points: ! ! .. a. rst Phrcse Rating (yes or no) : *I i te of Project Approved plication Date - LIBUSE DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH 1320 Grand Avenue Suite 15 San Marcos California 92069 (71 4) 744-3544 Tot Honorable Mayor Packard and Members of the City Council E'TtOM: Ca e Bristol Condominium Project c2 Mr. Perm Thayer 9184 Coast Highway, Suite A Dana Point, California 92629 SUBJECTt CAP3 BRISTOL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-16. WNT, 4525 COVE DRIE, BRISML COVE, CARLSUD, CA. PROPOSED 16 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOP- The owners of Cape Bristol Condominium project, represented by Mr. Penn Thayer, respectfully request that the City Council does not adopt a lottery-type sewer allocation program, but rather consider adopting a priority system of allocation which would give precedence to projects such as Cape Bristol Condo- miniums which qualified for the last sewer allocation program in March 1978. Sewer Allocation Program, qualified requests were submitted for 119 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) from the Multi Family Residential category; only 11 EDUs were available for allocation from the Multi Family Residential category. Cape Bristol Condo- miniums , which requires 16 EDUs, did not have an opportunity to secure any sewer permits under the 1978 sewer allocation program. Under the Second Revision of the First Phase The Cape Bristol Condominium project has been in the develop- ment process since 1972 and has secured all of the required discretionary governmental approvals with the exception of City building and sewer permits, of the project's governmental approvals: Following is a brief chronology May 4, 192- Application for a proval of Tentative Map No. 72-16. (Exhibit AT June 27, 1972- Planning Commission Resolution No. 799 Approval of Tentative Map No, 72-16. (Exhibit B) July 5, 1972- City Council Resolution No. 2036 Approval of Tentative Hap No, 72-16 (Exhibit C) Jan, 31,1973- Euilding Permits pulled for construction of the condominiums May 14, 193- Effective date of Coastal Development Permit F0246. (Exhibit D) Page 2 Memo to kyor Packard and Members of the City Council regarding Cape Bristol Condominium project, a proposed 16 unit condominium development on Cove Drive, Carlsbad, California. July 23 1979. July 31, 1973- In accordance with the conditions of TM 72-16 the developer deposited the following fees with the City of Carlsbadr 1. Account 65-16-94-. Fees and Deposits of $ 935.00 for monumentation, installation of an ornamental street light and street light energy. (Exhibit E) 2. Account 65-26-4. Park-in-lieu Fees of $7,705.20. (Exhibit F) August 7, 1973- Final Map Carlsbad Tract No, 72-16 approved by the City Engineer and recorded at the County Recorder's Office of San Diego County, CAI on August 15, 193. (Exhibit G) Dec.. 16, 1977- Effective date of Coastal Development Permit F6307. (Exhibit H) March 2, 1978- Application for 16 EDUs under the Second Revision to the First Phase Sewer Allocation fiystem. On record at the City as having qual- ified for the sewer allocation program. Dec, 16 1978- Effective date of Coastal Development Permit extension F6307-E. (Exhibit I) As the chronology shows, considerable time has been expended by both the developer and the City, to date, on the development of Cape Bristol Condominiums and a minimum of governmental processing requirements remain since the project is ready to be submitted to the Building Department for plan check and building permits. a variety of consumers ( the project consists of studio units, one bedroom and two bedroom units) wishing to reside in one of Carlsbad's major recreation areas, can be realized within a year of the issuance of the required 16 sewer permits for the project . Sixteen additional housing units for The owners of Cape Bristol Condominium project wish to hereby go on record with the City as being opposed to any lottery-type allocation of available City sewer hook-ups. A priority system which considers the history and merits of each proposed project would contribute positively to the well being ofboth the City Page 3 Memo to hyor Packard and Members of the City Council regarding Cape Bristol Condoninium project, a proposed 16 unit condominium development on Cove Drive, Carlsl.@, California. July 23. 1979, and the consumer. a year time period minimize City processing costs for additional residential units and minimize the developer's holding costs thus providing the consumer with a more affordable housing unit. Projects which may be constructed within TOTAL ACREAGE: . s-l/ NUtlEER OF LOTS: 1 - WINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE (FT.): +*-%E>' Industrial 1 PRESENT ZONE: PROPOSED ZOI!E: z-- , .L) / h/ /A . NAMES OF NEW STREETS PROPOSED: - PRE-FILING CONFERENCE HELD (DATE): \ 0- AFLQ .?z4 sz- - -r~p Wc-i4-w1~& . REGISTERED CIVIL ENGIKEER, ARCHITECT, OR SURVEYOP. WHO PREPARED MAP: 4 1 ~'OCc c dat !( FT t v I L.- <=A( 6 r-. Nane Title 343 F, 7 \ --,Z$\L 1 cc !Pi4 Ct75-A W<7=--zkI fA Ltt. c . s*--'.&',& kirdr'ess I THE FOLLOWIKG t1ODLFICATIONS TC THE ZCAING 92 SUBO.I'~ISIOFI REQUIREAERTS ARE HEREBY REQUESTED (Give reasans fir modif!caticns; attach separat? sheet if additional space is required): LtO LG OWCJER( S) ,?F PROPEgTY {SIGXATURES) SUBDIVIDER: This applfcation will be.fi1ed with 20 hluc line prfnts and 1 brown line transparency of the tentativ? map, prepared accordinq to thc specifications of Ordinance 110. V5@ and arnend5cntr thereto, togcthrr r',t,h,.tht? supplementary fnf3ririation ant fees reqv'i red by said ordin- I .- 1- I. I< PL.4i.l N I i.lG COI.lV I S S i C N E S9L --.- UT I ON NO. 799 3. 1; ' of Shelter Cove flap. 5162, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. ~ ' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did consider the tentative map as submitted, comprised of 1 lot; and I.-. - Exhibit B i! . ' A RESOlUTiO~l THE CARLSBAD CITY PLAMM. cOri.rmsIoN I I I I 6 7 I WHEREAS, the Planning Cornmission did take into consideration the I i reports of the various City agencies and utility companies; NOI-I, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the tentaitve map of Carlsbad Tract 72-16 be recommended for approval by the City Council for the 0 u ~ City of Carlsbad Subdivision Ordinance No. 9050 and Zoning Ordinance,l , Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 2. The proposed tentative map is in conformance with the City of I 9 10 I1 33 14 15 16 17 18 19 .20 21 22 23 24 ,25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RECOl~lfSEiiU11lG APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO BE KNONN , ' A.S CAPE BRISTOL, CARLSGAD TRACT 72-16 Conditions of approval : 1. That all exterior wo3d building materials utilized shall be ' ' treated with fire retardant materials or their equivalent as approved and required by the City of Carlsbad Fire Chief. 2. That fire hydrants and fire prevention devices shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Fire Chief. 3. That the proposed condominium shall be developed generally in confornmnce with the tentative map labeled Exhibit ''A". 4. applicants' rendering, Exhibit "11". That an architectural theme shall be developed as shown on the . I i That ;7 landscaping - and sprinkler plan b-e submitted to the Parks Recreation dctor for approval prior C the issuance of a 4 I' 6 6 7 .8 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I.? 18 . l9 i 20 I .I I 30 31 bii 1 ding permit. .. , 6. That the applicant shall comply with the City of Carlsbad Ordi- nance 9190, "Dedication of 1ar;d for parks or fees in lieu of". 7. That the applicant shall install one standard ornarrental street light in a liianner approved by the City Engineer. 8. That the docuincnts concerning the maintenance of all common fadilities and building exteriors shall be submitted to the staff for approval as part of final niap submittal. AND FINALLY RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Carlsbad for its attention, in thz manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED Ai4D ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Planning Coiilrnission held on the 2.7th day of June, 1972, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Dewhurst, Palmateer, Forman, Norman, Little, Jose NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Dominguez ELMER 1.1. JOSE, JR. , Chairman ATTEST: EDMOND W. DOMINGUEZ, Secretary d : A I f ? t : 1( 13 1: 1: 14 1: 16 l'i It 1s 2c 21 2i 2: 24 25 2E 21 28 29 30 31 52 .. I Exhibit C .. .. . ' .. .. RESOLUTION NO. 2036 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAO. APPROVING THE TENTATIVE MAP OF CARLSGAD TRACT 72-16. (CAPE BRISTOL) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad on the 27th day of June, 1972, recommended to the City Council that the tentative map of Carlsbad Tract 72-16, Cape Brfstol, be approved and; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 5th day of July, 1932 considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad that the City Council does hereby approve said tentative map for Carlsbad Tract 72-14, comprising one (1) lot, sub- ject to the following conditions: 1. That all exterior wood building materials utilized shall b treated with fire retardent materials or their equivalent as approved and required by the City of Carlsbad Fire Chief. 2. That fire hydrants and fire prevention devices shall be approved by the Cfty of Carlsbad Fire Chief. 3. That the proposed condominium shall be developed general1 in conformance with the tentative map labeled Exhibit "A". 4. That an architectural theme shall be developed as shown o the applicants' rendering, Exhibit "B". 5. That a landscaping and sprinkler plan be submitted to the Parks and Recreation Director for approval prior to the issuance cf a building permit. 6. That the applicant shall comply with the City of Carlsbad Ordinance 9190, "Dedication of land for parks or fees in lieu of". 7. That the applicant shall install one standard ornamental street light in a manner approved by the City Engineer. xx xx .. -1 - ... .. 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 e 9 ’ 1c 11 12 12 14 11 1€ li 1( - 15 2( 2: 2: 2: 24 21 24 2’ . 2l 2! W 3: 3: 0. .. . .. .. .. 8. That the documents concerning the maintenance of all common facflities and building exteriors shall be submitted to the staff for approval as part of final map submittal. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the subdivider shall furnish the U. S. Post Office, Carlsbad, California, with a copy of the final subdivision map. AND FINALLY RESOLVED that the City Clerk Is hereby directed to place a copy of this resolution, in the usual course of mail, addressed to the subdivider at his address as shown on the tentative map. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Cfty Council of the City of Carlsbad at an adjourned, regular meeting held on the 5th day of July, 1972, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmen Dunne, McComas, Lewis and Frazee. NOES: Councilman Chase. ABSENT: None. ATTEST: . (SEAL) -&.'- &,L-d/-C 7 MAY 1 8 Bn . a' . 12 STATE 9PCALIFOANIA - CALIFORNIA C ,TAL ZONE CONSERVATION COMMtSSION RONALD REAGAN. Governor Exhibit D SAN DIEGO COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION 6154'~ission Gorge Road, Suite 220,, San Diego, CA 92120 34 / Phone: 280-6932 Malcolm A. Lovo Chairman WIII1m A, Crmvan Vkm Chairman Rifcon, Inc. 4705 Marina Drive Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 PEE LOPhEXT PE RiilI T 'VW Project Address 4525 Cove ~)r. Carlsbad You are hereby granted a development permit. ing before the San Diego Coast Regional Commission (a copy of the Regional Con- mission's resolution of approval, vote, and other language, drawings and provi- sions is included herewith) low and subject to tenas, conditions, and provisions, hereinafter stated: This permit is issued after a hear- . This permit is limited to development described be- A. ' DEVELOPNENT: wistol Cove Condominium -- 16 unit, 3 story .B. TERiiE AID CONDITIOSS: 1. That the applicant agrees to edhere strictly to the &rent plans for the project as subnitted to the Conmission. 2. That the applicant agrees to rrotify.the Conmission oi' any substential changes in the project. 3. That the applicant will neet all the local code requirenents and or;tin&ces. 4. That the applicant agrees to conform to the pernit rules md regutatioas of the California Coastal Zme Conservztion Comission. . Terms and conditions are to run with the land. These tern and conditions shall be perpetual and it is the intention of the parties to bind a11 future owners and possessors of the sub j ect property except in following particulars : None I Y, .- I I :I I I PI I I I I c I I I ? I I I 1 i - JCOOOEOCOOOJOO~~COCO~c~o~~~ooc~oco~~e~~ooo JCo50c0~CCOOOOCC0010o~~ooc~ec~oo~o~aeo~ooc eceocecoocc~cccte~ceccoocc0ococccc,eoc~~occ ........................................... I I I , ! 2 L 4 5 .-. PARK AREA 14 7 Y L Y I IJ Exhibit F 65-26-4 ACCT. No. 1 SHEET NO. 1' . /L 11 CR 3 143 - I52 CR # 226 - 236 CR # 237 - 246 CHARGES 2450.00 t 9,494.49 L a70 9.4 1 37.84 4.2 8 3.6 8 1, S14.09 I i -- I --111 LEDGER CREDITS ~ . BALANCE PREVIOUS BALANCE 8677.311 9.1 89.8 1 744 86 3 &a7756 I 28117.05 b 23.8343, 23am.n b 239~5 2396352 9 27.1 80.0 35.515.40 f> 37,395.6 27.180.QZ 0 25.555.9 25365.95 31615.9 37.993.b3 Q 38,353.7 33,85838 4L497.7 i '_ .. d .. i Exhibit H - &TAT€ 6F CALIFORNIA-CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION - EOMUNO G. BROWN. JR.. Gownnor L SAN 0IEGO.COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION 6154 MISSION GORGE ROAD. SUITE 220 SAN OIEC0,CALIFORNIA 92120-TEL. (7141 280-6992 ROBERT C. F RAZEE Quimun VIRGINIA BRIDGE Vb Chairman JEFFERY D. FRAUTSCWY wmantative to the Cdifornia Coastal Commission Bruce. H. .Warren CONTR'QG NO.: F6307 Exrutive Director DATE CF CWSSI@l ACTICW: December 16, 1977 -CAN": Perm B. Thayer Box I. D. Dana Point, CA 92629 AQXI: None 0. PRWT LOCATICN: South side of Cok Dr., approx. 100 ft. east of the Cove Dr. cul-de-sac, Carlsbad (APN 207-150-84) You are hereby grarrted a coastal development permit. public hearing before the San Diego Coast Regional Commission and after the Regional Canmission found that tne proposed development is in conformity with the provisions of the California Coastal Act of 1976 including the following: This permit is issued after a duly held 1. 2, That the developnent is in conformity with Chapter 3 of the California Coastal That the permitted development will not prejudice the ability of any affected Act of 1976 (commencing with Public Resources Code, Section 30200). local government to prepare a local coastal program that is in conformity with Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act of 1976. That if the development is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shareline of any body of water located within the coastal zone, that the development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Public Resuurces Code, Sections 30210 - 30224). That there are no feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures, as pr- vided in the California Ibvironmental Quality Act, available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact that the development as finally proposed may have an the environment. This permit is limited to development described below and set forth in material on file with the Regional Commission and subject to the terms, conditions, and provisions hereinafter stated: A* DEvELm'mJT: arage), lbunit, condominium develo ment with recreation facilities 3. 4. Cmstruction of a lrstory (includes subterranean, 32-space parking fa swimming pool, jacuzzi,. rec. room P , .and laundry facilities. The 16 units will consist of 4 studio units, two 1-bedroom units, and 10 two-bedroom units. Density = 31.37 du/ac. No boat docks are planned at this time. .. RCV. 8/77) Lot area Buflding coverage Paved-are a coverage Landscape coverage Parking spaces zaring General plan Height above average .ktelgpment Permit; F - 6307 Page 2 of 3 B. TERMS ATJD CO€IDITIQJS: 1. That the applicant agees to adhere strictly to the current plans for the project That the applicant agrees to notify the Regional Commission (or State Commission if as approved by the Regional Commission. there is no Regional Commission) of any changes in the project, 2, 3. That the applicant will meet all the local code requirements and ordinances and obtain all necessary permits from State and Federal Agencies, 4. That the applicant agrees to conform to the permit rules ind regulations of the California Coastal Commission, 5, That the applicant agrees that the Commission staff may make site inspections of the project during construction and upon completion. Terms and conditions are to run with the land. petual, and it is the intention 01’ the parties to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to said terms and conditions, These terms and conditions shall be per- , Devskoprnent Permit; F 6307 -4 .Page 3 of 3 C. STAFSDARD PROVISIQJS: 1. STRICT CCIPLLQICCE: Permittee is under obligation to conform strictly to permit under penalties established by California Coastal Act of 1976, 2. TIMELY DEVELOpTjIENT AND CCMPLETION: Permittee shall commence development within one year following findl approval of the project by the San Diego Coast Regional Commission. Construction shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed within a reasonable period of time. 3. REQUEST FOR FXTENSIONS: Permittee may request an extension of time for the commen- cement of construction provided the request is applied for prior.to expiration of the permit. 4, ASSIGI$ABILITY OF PERMIT: This permit is not assignable unless the permittee's obligations under the permit are assumed by assignee in writing within one year and a copy of the required assumption agreement delivered to the Regional Commission or State Commis- sion if there is no Regional Commission. 5. APPEAL - Unless appealed to the State Commission within ten (10) working days following final action by the San Diego Coast Regional Commission, all terms and conditions shall be final, 6, DISCLAIMER: The permit is in no way intended to affect the rights and obligations heretofore existing under private agreements nor to affect the eesting regulations of other public bodies. 7. PERMITTEE TO RETURN COPY: This permit shall not be valid unless within ten (10) working days permittee returns a signed copy acknowledging contents to San Diego Coast Regional Commission. If you have any questions on this permit, please contact the staff of the Regional Commission. Very truly yours, Bruce H, Warrer, Executive Direct or Directions to Permittee: to the San Uiego Coast Regional Commission. Permittee is to execute below and return one copy of this permit I have read and understand the terms, conditions, limitations, and provisions of this permit and agree to abide by them, Exhibit I STATE OF CA tl FORNIA-CALI FORNlA COASTAL CO??IMISSION EDMUNO C. BROWN. JR.. Governor a- SAN DIEGO COAST REGIONAL COMh?ISSION SkN DIEG0,CALIFORNIA 92120-TEL. (714) 280-6992 Tim Cohelan RDger A. Hedgecock Olai-man 6154 MISSiON GORGE ROAD, SUITE 220 Vice Chairman December 15, 1978 Perm P. Thayer Dana Point, CA 92629 P.0. BOX 1.D. JEFFERY D. FRAUTSCHY Representative to ;ha California Coastal Commission Bruce H. Warren Executive Director ~1 December 1, 1978 , .the San Dicgo Cozst Regional Cornmission approved your request for extension of the starting construction date for yaur permit No. E6307-E Length of the extension granted is 12 months from <he ariginal expiration date of your permit. If you have any questions on this, please contact our office. .* ’Executive DiSctor 5620 FRIARS ROAD . SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 714 291-0707 February 11, 1980 City Sewer Committee City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Re: Allocation of Sewer Capacity Gentlemen: Rick Engineering Company is the owner of 28,000 square feet of property at the northeast corner of Oak and Jefferson Streets. We request being considered for 35 edu of the reserve capacity that the City will now be allocating. If we are successful in this request, we propose to submit a request for a Conditional Use Permit for 45 one-bedroom apart- ments for seniors. Sincerely, WBR:cs Enclosures ECEIVED A-- I .: , (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) DA1L ,,,October 8, 1979 1. Descyiption cf Project (Residential, Commercial, Indnstrial . . . N~. of units, etc.1: Not to exceed 48 one bedroom apartments for seniors (Sec. Ord. 9528) 2, Location of Project: The subject property is generally located on the North east side of Jefferson Street be tween Oak Avenue and. Elm Avenue Page 35 (352) Parcels 5-10 incl. 20 3 3. Assessor's Number: Book Book Page Parcels (use hack of page if iiec e s s ar y ) 4. .Owner (s) : Name Address City State Zip ?hone Glenn A. Rick Engineering and Developmen LCO I 5620 Friars Rd., San Diego, CA 92110 291-0707 (714) - -. ' 5. Applicant: N-a me Address City ' State Zip Phone William B. Rick, 5620 Friars Road, San Diego, California 92110 (714) 291-0707 Representing (Company or Corp. ) Rick Engineering Company I hereby declare that a11 information contained within this application and the accompanying attachments havg been READ, UNDERSTOOD , AND IiAS BEEN ANSIJERED COl'liilCTLY 'YO TIIE BEST OF ElY , ABILITY. Applicant I s Signature The following qucstjons riiust be answered concc!-liing your- project: 1. 2. 3. 4. Is the location of your project inside the infill boundaries as approved by Council? Yes If not'in the infill area, what existing development is your project adjacent to? Not applicable - -- .. .. Approximate distance between the adjacent developnient and your project. What previous approvals has the City granted for the project or site? Ordinance No. 9528 permitting the necessary CUP application Date of any such approval August 7p 1979 Wi 11 your project requf re further discretionary perrrii ts? . If so, what are those perinits? Conditional Use Permit Yes 5. Is there a septic system presently serving or approved for the project or site? . No. (However, there are three existing service lines. See attached - 6. How niany dvrclliny Knits are proposed 07 iio;v nisny equivalent dwellinq units are .. requireb? }job/ niany jobs wi13 be created by tho iiiip-lem:rlnt;atiort of this proj?cb:-- 35 gdu (48 one bedroom apartments' for seniors) - See attz hed calculations) ,.4,1-2 maintenance ce 7. No N.A. 8. Have earlier phases of ti12 pr-oject been approved? Degree of completion of earlier phases 9. Will the project create any pubJic costs for City facilities such as streets, sewers, etc.? No Did this project qualify for rating under the First Phase Sewer- Allocation System? Not to my-e 10. To the best of my knowledge iny proposed project will not wquirc any public costs for City Facilities to service the sit(!, such as streets, sewers, etc. I utitlcrst;nd thdt if it is detcrniined by City, staff that iiiy project will require such jjublic costs, 111y application will be disqualified froni considcration aiid niy application fees will not be rcfundcd. I hereby certify that if sn allocation is rnsc!c, I ani ready and able to pursue the project to conipletion in accordance witti the time limits of the second phase systtni. I agree to ?ay as a condition of receiving a sewer connection permit and in addition to all other fees, a public facilities fee in an ac:aunt to bc deterr:iined by the City Counci 1 . LOG NO. .-- App'l i cant ' s Si gnattire 9/73 h * I Y 0 " . " " .* I --- --- a ELM 1 4 a 8 & NE. I L 18 I 1- t .s4 t: J a RlCK ENGINEERING COMPANY I pAA~NC'~'Z%KEZ 5620 FRIARS ROAD SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110 TELEPHONE . AREA CODE 714 291-0707 EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT CALCULATIONS Rick Engineering Company Property Northeast Corner of Jefferson Street @ Oak Avenue, Carlsbad 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Property Description Lots 1-8 inclusive, Block 57, Town of Carlsbad Amended Area: 28,000 S.F. Zoning: RP Proposed Use: Seniors Housing under C.U.P. Density (under C.U.P. - proposed) 75 du/ac x 28,000 =$ 43,560 = 48 apartments allowed Equivalency Calculation a. Fixture unit (f.u.) method* Plumbing Item Proposed 1 BR 2 BR/2 Bath House Bath tub 1@2f.u. 2f.u. 2G2f.u. 4f.u. Toilet (flush tank) 1 @ 3 f.u. 3 f.u. 2 G 3 f.u. 6 f.u. Lavatory 1 @ 1 f.u. 1 f.u. 2 @ 1 f.u. 2 f.u. Sink - 1 @ 2 f.u. 2 f.u. 1 @ 2 f.u. 2 f.u. Clothes washer 1 @ 2 f.u. 2 f.u. 1 @ 2 f.u. 2 f.u. 11 f.u. 16 f.u. * Table A-2 UPC - 1979, p.13 11 16 1- 1BR apartment = - edu = 0.7 edu b. Population method (I) Edu usage: 246 gal/edu/day (City standard) (2) Individual usage : 90 gal/cap/day (per "Encina Regional Sewage Survey-1971"- Brown & Caldwell (3) Assume maximum 2 persons/l BR apartment = 2 x 90 e 246 = 0.73 edu/apartm.ent ... , Equivalent Dwelling Unit Calculations - Page 2 Rick Engineering Company 7. Demand Calculation - 48 apartments, 1 bedroom a. Fixture unit method 48 apartments x 0.7 edu = 33.6 edu OR b. Population method 48 apartments x 0.73 edu = 35 edu OR c. Calculation per County Ordinance No. 4727 See Article 5 of table of equivalent dwelling units 1 bedroom unit = 0.6 edu @ 280 gal/edu/day 280 x 0.6 x 48 apartments = 32.8 edu 246 WBR: lms 10/8/79 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 1 %*E'I%%~'%%SS RECEIVED 3088 PI0 PIC0 DR. SUITE 202 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 P.O. BOX1129 PHONE AREACODE714 729-4987 Mr. Joe Eggleston ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT CITY OF CARLSBAD Engineering Department 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ALLOCATION OF SEWER CAPACITY Dear Joe: This morning we delivered a request for 35 edu's of the reserve capacity that the City will now be allocating. The attached calculations did not take into account the 3 sewer connections that already exist on our property. (See attached City of Carlsbad letters dated 9/6/79, and 8/31/79) We hereby request 32 edu's, in place of the original 35. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Robert C. Ladwig RCL: rc Enclosures cc: William B. Rick 4 ’ 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 September 6, 1979 TELEPHONE: (714) 729-1 181 Mr. Robert C. Ladwig Rick Engineering Company P.O. Box 1129 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: Property at the Northeast Corner of Jefferson Street and Oak Avenue We have checked our records and find the following: 812 Oak Avenue - no record 840 Oak Avenue - no record 3092 Jefferson Street- 3 sewer connections It is the present policy of the City to leave the connections attached to the lots when buildings are demolished. There is, however, no guarantee that this policy will be continued in the future. (Uff &I. Richard H. Allen, Jr. Principal civil Engineer RHA:mmt ’ 1200 ELM AVENUE . CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 ! I QCltp of darlsbab August 31, 1979 Rick Engineering 3088 Pi0 Pic0 Carlsbad, California Attention: Bob Ladwig Dear Mr. Ladwig: RICK ENG. Date Received SEP 0 4 1979 According to our records, the City of Carlsbad is billing the property located at 3092 Jefferson for three (3) sewer connections. A copy of the most recent meter book page reflecting a $6.00 monthly charge for sewer service (3 connections @ $2.00) is enclosed. I hope this information will be of some assistance. Sincerely JM . ELLIOTT Acting Finance Director JFE : lw TELEPHONE: (714) 729-1181 Encl. h February 3, 1980 926 Richmond Drive Claremont, Ca. 91711 Dear Sirs t We have been allocated Sewer Permit #M-36 and you informed us we must have an application for 8 Building Permit in, on or before February 1F(, 1980. We have run into difficulty with building plans, as it is almost impossible to build three units and five carports, as planned, and have decent sized units. We are now going to build two units on the lot and this will require new plans, This is valuable property and we do want to give this careTul consideration. We a going to build. However, your deadline is putting us under a lot of pressure. We are meeting with our builder on February 8 and hope to get the problems resolved then, It is extremely difficult for a person not in the construction field, to start from scratch and get building plans, construction loan, etc. in the time you have designated, Zombined with this is the added disadvantage of being a distance from Carlsbad and every- thing has to be done "long distance". We request an extension of 30 days be granted us. Sincerely, ,- Pamela C . Pot z Herbert G. Potz. R E p u B Ll c TOOL 6. MANUFACTURING CORP 191 5 ARMACOST AVENUE, LOS ANGELES. CAL January 30, 1980 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Frank Aleshire, City Manager Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: I respectfully request an allotment of three EDUs of sewer capacity from discretionary capacity to permit the development of a bank building on Lot #1 in Palomar Airport Business Park. The property is located on the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Yarrow Drive. For a minimum number of EDUs, this development will provide employ- ment for between 20 and 30 people. The facility will serve the immediately adjacent industrial community, and will provide amen- ities which will encourage continued and expanding industrial usage in the area. A major domestic bank has confirmed its desire and intention to occupy the site in a class A structure which will contribute sig- nificantly to the high calibre development of the area. The contemplated usage is in the general office category which is permitted under a conditional use permit in the Planned Industrial Zone in which the property is located. There will be no production of air, water, or noise pollution. The requested sewer capacity will be used exclusively for the sanitary needs of bank employees. The intended occupants were prepared to proceed on the basis of the Council's earlier action adopting Alternative #2 contained in the . t Mayor and Members of the City Council January 30, 1980 Page two City Engineer's report of December 31, 1979 on new Industrial Sewer Allocation. They are still prepared to proceed immediately upon our receipt of an allocation of the three EDUs necessary for the project (calculated in accordance with the formula provided by the City Engineer). The timing element for the bank has become extremely critical, and the selection of our Carlsbad site has resolved into a ques- tion of now or never. We obviously would like to avoid the sub- stantial economic loss that we will suffer by being unable to accommodate this excellent tenant. We believe this project provides a type of development sought by the City of Carlsbad, and I trust we will receive an early favor- able response to our request.