HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-04-15; City Council; 6228; Roberti-Z'Berg Urban Open Space Recreation Program Act Block Grantr
k
0 ' "_""""." CITY OF cnl;r,:;i3Ao --- , ' e-
.\
AGENDA BILL l?O (. * ' /J 2 2 t? Initial:
Dept.IIc-i.3 - DATZ: I April 15 s 1980 *
~~ - C, Atty.1
D)EPARTMENT: Parks " and Recreation c. MyK. - r
..
Sazbject: "
ROBERTI-Z'BERG URBAN OPEN .SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM ACT BLOCK GRANT'
. Stater:lcnt of the Ratter
The City has been allocated $4,366 as part of the Raberti-Z'berg Urban Open Spact Recreation Program Act. Tnis is a block grant, which means the funds are allocal
capita basis to agencies in urbanized areas. The cqleted grant application nu
submitted to the State by May 1,. 1980 to be fully executed by June 30, 1980.
me Parks ad Recreation Departrmt has identifed four possible projects 'for the
these funds. These alternatives are presented belaw:
TOTAL COSTS CITY SIiAl 1) Carlsbad High School Tennis Court Lighting - three $16., 900 m
2) ,@dencia Park Equipment - fencing , backstops , $ '6,6O.O z $ 2,23
3) Holiday Park '- basketball court construction;' $ 5,900 $ L53
. 4) &se Field Landscaping - turf , irrigation, picnic $ 6,000 $ 1333
Funds for the above projects are available from Park-in-Lieu wries and/or the A Trust Fund Account .* .
Parks and Recreation staff recamends alternative nmber 1, Tennis Court Lightin the information provided in Exhibits 1 and.2. This will require the City Comci
. continue $7,000 frm the 1979-80 budget to the, 1980-81 fiscal year .budget and tc use of Park-in-Ueu or Adult Sports Trust Fund miea to-be used in conj~ction
grant funds. It is estimated that on-going operatiai costs for the City $11 be
mnth for utilities for alternate 1, .and the operation costs associated with the
alternatives would be minhl. ' . .
"""
' tds courts . ($7,000 already budgeted)
. bleachers, soccer goals
tables, trees and shrubs
.Exhibits 1. Memorandum to City Manager , dated April 4, 1980 2. , Memorandm to City Manager, .dated April 8 , 1980 3. Resolution No. &/5,3, authorizing .I applicatim €or grant fm&. .
..
Recommendations
, That the City Council:
1. Approve continuing appropriations of $7 , 000 to be used to light three .high 1 courts. for fiscal year 1980-81, subject to an agreement with .. the School Dis.
' use of the tennis courts.
. ' 2.. Adopt Resolution No, c. 153, authorizing application, for grant funds.
.Council Action:
4-15-80 Council adopted Resolution 6153, approving the application for grant 1
Roberti -Z'Berg '"Fan space and rec. subject to purpose being A1 ternat
set forth above.
t 0 e """ -
L
MEMORANDUM
TO : Bill Baldwin, Assistant City Manager
FROM : David L. Bradstreet, Parks and Recreation Director
DATE : April 4, 1980
SUBJECT: Grant Funds for Tennis Court Lighting
D
The City has been allocated $4,366 under the Roberti-Z'berg
Urban Open Space and Recreation Program Act. Last year, the City applied for and received $6,000, which was used to purcha:
picnic tables, benches and barbeque stands for various City parks. This is a block grant, so the funds are allocated on a per capita basis to agencies within designated urban areas. To be eligible for these funds,they must be encumbered by a fully-executed agreement by June 30, 1980.
There is currently $7,000 budgeted for lighting the two tennis
courts south of the proposed pool site. Additionally, the Cit Council, in their Capital Improvement Priority List, has plans
to light the nine tennis courts owned by t'he School District. When these courts were built the City provided $5,000 for the electrical stub outs for future lighting. The School District has no need for lighted courts for its programs, so these would be for general citizen use.
Since, there is some question regarding the outcome of the tennis courts adjacent to the proposed swim complex, it is recommended that the City light three tennis courts owned by the School District. These lighted courts would be open to th public during non-school hours.
The original $7,000 budgeted for lighting two courts is now
inadequate and the department has determined that it would be as economical to light three courts as two, because of the la: out of the high school courts, and the requirement for fencing
if additional posts were required. Additionally, this would provide one more lighted court for public use.
The estimate to light the three court is $16,900. It is prop( that the $7,000 already budgeted be carried over as a continu: appropriation for next fiscal year, that the City use $4,366 : grant funds and that the remaining $5,534 be provided by the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund for adult sports activities.
* A. 0 e
I
This is more clearly outlined below:
$ 7 ? 000 Continuing Approprriations 4,366 Grant Funds 5,534 Parks and Recreation Trust Fund
$16,900 TOTAL
In summary, it is recommended the City light three tennis COUI
on school property and that the City apply for a grant in the
amount of $4,366. This will also require continuing
appropriations of $7,000
DLB:MDL:vI~
-2-
4 ,*
-+ 0 @ -YIuIA* -
c;
MEMORANDUM
TO : Frank Aleshire, City Manager
FROM : David L, Bradstreet, Parks and Recreation Director 2 i
DATE : April 8, 1980
SUBJECT: Roberti-Z' Berg Block Grant
The following information regarding the history and background 1 the tennis court lighting project and suggested alternative projects for possible funding under the Roberti-Z'Berg program is submitted for your information and direction.
TENNIS COURT LIGHTING BACKGROUND FY 77-78 I.) In October, 1977 the Parks and Recreation Commiss
and staff recommended that due to the congested c ditions at the two. existing lighted tennis courts Laguna Riveria Park that grant monies be pursued
building and/or lighting two additional courts as feasible.
FY 78-79 2) The project was incorporated into the 78-79 Capil
$7,000 was appropriated to light two tennis courl at the Monroe Street courts.
Improvement Project program as priority no. 33, i
3) The project was deferred to the 79-80 CIP progra pending swimming pool complex construction.
4) In February, 1979 staff was directed to update b for the lighting project,with the followin resu a) two courts adjacent to swimming poo,l - $10,60
b) two courts at Carlsbad High School - $ 9,30
c) three courts' at Carlsbad High School - $13,5C
FY 79-80 5) In September, 1979 the Engineering Department
requested information on construction projects f fiscal year 79-80.
6) Staff supplied Engineering with the requested ir
mation regarding the $7,000 lighting project.
7) In budgeting for the swimming pool, Engineering
planned to incorporate the $7,000, which had previously been earmarked for tennis court lighi into- the swirmning pool complex project 9 for par1 lot lighting.
+: 0 0
*4
t
8) According to the Finance Director, as of April 8, 1980, the transfer of funds has not been made, an
there is still $7,000 iv2ilable,,for the tennis co 1TgFtin.g project.
9) On April 1, 1980. Parks and Recreation staff was directed to update costs, for materials only, to light three courts. The estimated cost is $16,9C
10) On April 4, 1980 an agenda bill was submitted, requesting City Manager and City Council approval to execute the Roberti-Z'Berg Block Grant agreemc to light three tennis courts at Carlsbad High Scl
DISCUSSION
Staff feels that this lighting project should be given a high priority for the following reasons: 1) The City of Carlsbad has only two lighted tennis courts, bo1
of which receive heavy daily and yearly usage.
2) The National Standards call for one lighted tennis court fo~ every 2000 persons in the population. According to these; standards, the City of Carlsbad should'have fifteen lighted tennis courts.
3) Due to the increasing popularity of tennis in the country, i well as this area in particular, there is a high public dem, for additional lighted tennis court facilities.
ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS The City Manager or Council may wish to explore other projects * would qualify under the Roberti-Z'Berg.program. The following projects are to be considered:
1) Cadencia Park Equipment - fencing, $6,600 $2,234
TOM-, COSTS CITY SURF, GE
backstops, bleachers, .soccer goals -
2) Holiday Park - basketball court $5,900 $1,534 construction, tot lot improvements
3) Chase Fld. Landscaping - turf/ $6,000 $1,634 irrigation, picnic tables, trees, shrubs
DISCUSSION
Funds for the above projects are available from Park-In-Lieu mo and/or the Adult Sports Trust Fund Account.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact at Extension 5571 at your convenience.
DLB : vlh
cc Bill Baldwin, Assistant City Manager
A -2-
4 *- I1 11 ji
0 e
a.
2
3
4
5
‘6
1 $11 1;
/I
I I
pJES*~~U~~(J~\~ F<(? . 6 ’I 5 3
”__
A ~~~S~T.,U’”LQ~~~ DF rpE CTT‘J COUNCIL QF ‘THE CZ’jy QT Cji.&LS&i5 , QJEIFQp;rJAf /Lpj?~2\~yj-NG
RECREATi‘LON WS)GPJPI
‘IEiE ikPj”LIC/iTIc)l< F,apk Gz<g<T FUNDS !Jj,;?SF< TIjX Rg3EFLEI-z, r BERG vRa,AJj OpEN syfiic;E AND
_”””.” ”””--””
b7.TF 7 V t’~~.Ah.~~&, the legiskture of -the State of Californi_a hrc
I 7
9 ’ State of California for acqiliring lands and for developing
which provides funds to certain political subdivisions of . 8
enacted the Roberci-Z’Berg Urban Open Space 2nd Kecreatj-on
I
3.0 j! facilities to meet urban recreation needs; and
2.1 WEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation
12 been delegated the responsibility for the adninistration o
r3il progrzm, setting up necessary procedures ggverning applic;
- j!
X!3 1
14 )by local agencies under the program; and
WHEREAS, said prodedures esrablished by the State Dei
16
said applications to the state; and 18
resolution the approval of applications prior to submissi’ 17
of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify 1
29 TJHEREAS, said applications contain a certification t 1 ’ 20 applicant will comply with all federal, state, and local
21
and regulations prior to the expenditure of the grant ful 23
clearinghouse requirements and all other appropriate cod6 ..22
environmental, public health, relocation, affirmative act
24 WHEREAS, the project(s) applied for under this prog:
25
recreation needs with emphasis on unmet needs in the mos 26
must be of a high priority and satisfy the most urgent p
27
xxx 28
heavily populated areas;
I
9 e /I e
11 , 1
I Nrjid: 1C';IEREFGRE j BE IT RESOL,'JEI? by the .Ci 'cy COU,IIC~~
2 City of CarLsba..d, Califomla as follows:
1. Approves the filing of an applica.Eion 'for fundi
4 1 the Roberti-Z' Berg Urban Open Sp~ce and Recrea.tLon Prop '3 1 5
7l
2. Certifies th.at said agency understands rhe gene
i 6 provisions of the agreement; a.nd
3. Certifi-es that said agency has or will have suj 8ij funds to operate and mainlain the project (s) funded undt
!? 11 program; and'
10 4. Certifies that said a.gency has or will have am
X' prior to conmencement of any work. on the project(s) incl
l2 in this application matchj-ng money &om a nonstate sour(
13 S. Certifies that the project(s) included in this
. l4 conform to the recreation element of the applicable tit:
15 county general plan;
16 6. Appoints the City Manager as agent of the City
17
s8
Carlsbad to conduct all negotiati.ons, execute and strbmi-
amendnents, payment requests, and so on which may be ne1 I'
documents including, but not 1.imited to applications, a;
I 20
22
22
23
24
25
s 26
27
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
1
xx
xx
xx
28 I1 -2-
A ** // 0 e jl
xi I
for the ccmple~ioz OL 'the aForemen~j-oned projects (s) *
C'
2/
PASS13, APPROVED AiW kiD91TED, by the City CoE>cil of t
3 1 City of Carlsbad at a reg~S.-a~:. neetillg cf the City Coil-ncil h I 4 I the 15'c.h day Qf &rJ j 1960, by the fall.owi.ng vote t
5
6
7
i "
1577kt :
AYES.: Counc-ilrne1-1 Packard, Anear, Lewis and Councilwomen Casler t
NOES : Now
81 ABSENT: None
9
10
"--7
/q //' /J;f /c ; ,/? &,; :....t- -<='-:
fi:;(y;
/./' m.f&:- *' ,/-=A
RONALD C. PACHARD J Mayor
'I
12
ATTEST:
I.5 ~-l&jLh,& 1 2. Qg,JiJL&
14 ALE Ilk L. XAUTEJlKRANZ J Clty ClerrJ
. 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
. . . '25
26
27
28 I
(SEAL j
,
-3-