HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-05-06; City Council; 6238; REVISION TO EXISTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, SANTA FE KNOLLS CASE NO: CT 75-9 B4i ?’ ..
’? 6 .. x
ClTY OF CARLSBAD
_~----1_1
I N 1 T I A L Dept. Hd. ~- %ejf
Cty. Atty. is&+
Cty. Mgr.
____ /~J:ENDA dILL i40s -~ ba3p -- I
?@!Y 6, 1980
.--___--I-
C ;i T E :
DSPAR. [{LNT: PLATV’NING - -_c_
-
IIEVIFION TO EXISTING TENTATIVE SUEDIVIEION YAP, SANTA rE KP;C
CASE NO: CY 75-9(B) APFLICANT: LA COSTA LAND CO?IPANY
__ll_l----c_-----.-- STA’I EMIII?:T OF THE MiiTTfR
--I-C- ----
The property is located east of Rancho Santa Fe Road, soutk
of La Costa Avenue extension. The original subdivision was
approved on January 1977, as one phase, 211 lot subdivision.
This revision provides four phases for this subdivision.
The number of lots and design of the subdivision remain the
same.
Through the planning staf? review and the Planning Commission
hearing, all concerns have been resolved for this project.
EXEIBITS
1. Planning Commission Zesolution No. 1615
2. Staff Report dated March 26, 1980
3, Staff Xeport dated November 28, 1979
4. City Council Xesolution KO. 4072
5. Exhibit ”X” dated March 11, 1980
RECOX ;ENDAT I OP:
Both the Planning staff and Planning Commission recommend that
this application be APPROVED and that the City Attorney be directed
to prepare documents APPROVING CT 75-9(B), per Flannincj Commission
Resolution KO. 1615.
Council Action:
5-6-80 Council directed the City Attorney to prepare documents approving CT 759-(B) per Planning Commission Resolution 1615, subject to the
changes recommended by the Planning Director during staff report.
,. r I. ..
1 PLANNIKG CONYXTSSON msOr.,uTIcm _-. NO. 16x5 - -.- _-.
A RESOLUTION OF T1;E PLANNING CO!Q\?ISSION OF THE
3l 7 51 6
7
8
9
10
'X
I-2
13
I*
15
l6
APPROVAL OF A REVISION TO AN EXISTING TENTATIVE
MAP TO PROVIDE FOR THE PI-IASING OF A 211 LOT
SUBDIVISIOE LOCATED SOUTH OF LA COSTA AVENUE,
EAST OF RANCHO SANTA FE.
CASE NO: a CT 75-9(B)
APPLICANT: SANTA FE XNGLLS
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property,
to wit:
A portion of lots 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10 of Rancho Las
Encinitas as shown on Map No. 848, as filed in the
Office of the County Recorder for San Diego Couxty.
has been filed with the' City of Carlsbad, and referred to
the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad blunicipal Code; and
WHEREAS, this project has been processed through
environmental review as required in Title 19, the Environment
l7
I'
l8
'*
21
' 22
1' Protection Ordinance. The proposed subdivision has complied
with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protectio
I Ordinance through prior compliance (Section 19.04.153) becaus I
1. An 'Environmental Impact Report , (EIR-307) was prepared
for amendments -to the La Costa Ttaaster Plan and certified by the City Council on April 27, 1976; ' 2. A report, Archaeoloqical Investigations at Santa Fe Knol
has been acccpted which mi-tigates the irnpacts of the
23 24 I
25
26
proposed project on the archaeological resources of the
project site; and
3. There arc no substantial changes in the proposed project
which have not been adequately addressed by the llaster or supplemental EIRS.
27
28
I ////
////
3-
*
' '*:.
,.
..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
22
12
13
14
15
16
1?
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
I
\JHEREAS, the Planning Ccmmissi-on did, on the 26th day oj
March, 1980, hold t: duly noticed public hearing as prescribec
by law to consider said request.
I
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consir
all testimony and arguments, if any, of a11 persons desiring
to be heard, said Cornhission considered all factors relating
the Tentative Tract Map.
NOT"?, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A. That the above recitations are true and correct.
B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hear
the Commission finds the following findings and conditi
to exist:
Findings
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because:
a) The project density of 3 dwelling units per acre
conforms with the Land Use Element designation of
residential low-medium density, 0-4 du/acre; and
b) The project does not conflict with any element of the general. plan.
1 2) The site is physically suitable for the type and. densi-
of development because:
a) The subdivision has been designed recognizing the
I 1
natural slope and soil constraints of the site;
and
b) The low density of 3 du/acre allovs for the physi I
consideration of the site.
3) An environmental impact report (EIR-307) was prepared
for amendments to the La Costa Xaster Plan and certifi
by the City Council on April 27, 1976;
////
////
-2- I///
PC RES0 li.1.615
2%
.\ . ’*-, . ,. 4
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
97
18
19
20
23.
22
23
24
25
26
a7
28
1 0 0 I
A report , Archaeologi-cal Investigations at Santa F’e Kno:
has been accepted which mitigates the impacts of Yie
proposed project on the archaeological resources of the project site; and
There are no substantial changes in the propose2 projec- which have not been adequately addressed by the >laster
or Supplemental E12 I S.
This project is :onsistent with all public facility
policies and ordinances because:
a) Sewer service is not available for this project at
this time. The Plznning Commission has, by inclus
of an appropriate condition, insured that the final map for each phase shall not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service
is available to serve the project. In addition, E
cond.ition has been added requiring that a note be
placed on the final map that building permits may not be issued unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available.
Since the final map cannot be approved unless
sewer service is available, the building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, the requirements of the public
facilities element of the General Plan have been
met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this and tenative map approval.
.--- _L ---_____-._ c_ ___-___-____ ___
4)
b) Agreements have been made with both Encinitas and San Dieguito Unified School District to pay schoo
fees.
c) Water service will be provided by Olivenhain
14unicipal Water District.
!
a’) Gas and electric service will be provided by
SDG&E.
e) All necessary on-site and adjacent public facilit
would be required as per the City’s Public Improv
Ordinance or as conditions of approval.
f) At this time, all other public facilities necessa to serve this project will not be available concu
with need. The Planninq Commission has, by inclu of an appropriate condition I required that the
project contribute to the cost of such facilities
Since the developer will pay for its proportionat
share of the public facilities t~7hiCh it wi.11
require , the Plsnnii~,g Commission is sati.sfi.ed th; I I I’C RESO #1G15
i -3-
-\
111
2
4
5
the requirements of the puhlic facilities element
of the general plan have been satisfied.
C ond. i -2. j. o n s
1) Approval is granted for CT 75-9(A) as shown in Planning
3-
Commtssion CT 75-9 (a) Exhibit ''X", dated !.larch 11, 1980,
on file in the Planning Department, and incorporated here in by reference. Development shall be substantially as
shown on said Exhibits.
.. < 'J
6!
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
l6
17
18
19
20
21
' 22
23
24
26
25
27
28
0 0
2) All conditions of CT 75-9 (City Council Resolution No.
4072) shall remain in effect, except as otherwise noted herein.
3) Condition 11 of City Council Resolution ?do. 4072 is anend as follows:
Concurrent with final map recordation for Unj-t 1, the
applicant shall dedicate the area designates as the "Proposed Park Site" on Exhibit "X", 3/11/80. The park site so dedicated shall be 12.5 acres in size and its
precise boundaries shall.. he approved by the City Council
prior to approval cf the final map for Unit 1.
The applicant shall provide school fees to miticrate
conditions of overcrowcing as part of building perm.it
app1,ication. These fees shall be based on the fee
schedule in efcect at the time of building permit applic;
4)
5) This subdivi,sion is approved upon the express condi.tion
'that the final map shall not be approved unless the
City Council finds at the time of such approval that
sewer service is available to serve the subdivision.
This subdivision is approved upon the express condition
th4t building permits will not he issued for development
of the subject property unless the City Engineer de'cermi
that sewer facilities are available at the time of
application for such permits and will continue to be avail-able until time of occupancy. If the City Engi-neer determines that sewer facilities are not available, bu.ilding permits will not be issued.
16) I
7) Conditions 23 61 24 of Ci.ty Council ResoLution No. 4072
are amended as follows:
Mission Estancia and I,a Costa Avenue shall be ded.ica.ted and qraded on the basis cf an 84 foot right of way plus slope easements as required. Improvements shall I consist of full imprnvemcnts to ci.ty standards for a 32
foot half street I including street lights, Additionall; at each inter-secti.on wikh Rancho Santa Fe Road and for
a d:i-s-tancc of lo0 fcel:, the pnvcment shz1.1 be wiuened
to a mininium of 20 feet and a taper from the 40 foo-13
width to thz 32 foot width ,of at least 200 feet shall
I
I '
I l-;P RVSC) $! 16 15 -- 4 I
,f > ..
3, *.., * bi .I
0 0
Se provi-ded to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
21
3
4
5
6
All slopes adjacent to the streets shall be 2:l maximurri.
Xission Estancia shall be constructed from Xancho Sant.a Fe Road to the intersection with "A" Street concurrent with Unit No. 1 of the subdivision. ?lission Estancia
shall be constructed .from "A" Street to the proposed La
Costa A.venue intersection concurrent with Unit KO. 2 , of
the subdivision.
La Costa Avenue shall be constructed concurrent with
Unit No. 2, of the subdivision.
8
7
9
10
11
12
13
The applicant shall enter into a secured agreemer,t for
improvement of the northerly half of Nission Estancia
along the proposed park site frontage to City of Carlsba
standarzs.
Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be widened and/or striped to
provide a separate southbound! left turn lane into
Mission Cst'ancia and a separate northbound riqht turn
lane into the street. The widening and/or striFing
shall extend approximately 600 feet north of the intersection and approximately 400 feet south and shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
This work shall be accomplished with the construction
,i
8)
3-41
15
. 16
of Unit No. 1 of the project.
The eastern half street of Rancho Santa Fe Road shall
be improved at the intersection of La Costa Avenue
sufficient to provide turning moves in and out of La
I7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
27
Costa Avenue and shall be designed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer. This work shall be accomplished concurrently with the construction of La Costa Avenue. i 1
~ 9) This approval is expressly conditioned on the payment SI
the applicant of the public facilities fee required by t
Ci1s.y Council Policy Eo. L7, dated August 29, 1979, on fj with the City Clerk and incorporated by re'erence. Accc
j-ng to the agreement executed by the a-pplicant for paym
of said fee. A copy of that agreement, dated Plarch 20,
is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. If SE
fee is not paid as promised, this application will r,ot 4 consistent with the General Plan and the project cannot ceed and this approval shall be void.
Brush clearance shall be provided around the edges of e:
unit to the satisfaction of the City of CarlsbadFire l4a1 10)
11) A looped water line shall be installed from "H1' Street ,
in Unit 2, to "l?" Street in Unit 3, to the satisfaction of the City of Carlsbad Fire !<Tarshall. 'rhis line shall
be installed concurrent '~7ith Lhe devel-opment of Unit 2.
PC RES0 1:1615
-5-.
I
2'
' t' ..
.: . . :,
A.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
XI
12
13
24
a5
16
ar
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
24
26
Y 28
a 0
12) Condition 37 of City Counci.1 %solution No. 4072 is ar?endl
as follows:
That portion of Exhibit ':X", dated March 11, 1980, labele
future High School Site, sha1.l be included within the
boundaries of the fi.na1. subdivi..si-on map for Unit 1, The
applicant shall reach an agreement with the San Diequito
Union High. School District to ensure that necessary schoo
site will be provided and resolve the status of the rcser
site. Said agreement shall be subject -to the approval of
the City Council prior to final map approval for Unit 1.
'ID" Street and "G" Street shall be extended offsite to in sect as part of Unit No. 2 consturction in order to provi
access to lots on "G" Street.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held
on the 26th day of March, 1980, by the following vote,
to wit:
13)
AYES: Schick, Larson, Friestedt, Marcus, Leeds, Rombotis
Jose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
I
f
- CARLSBAD PLANNING ',COJdylIS,S ' \-.. .J
ATTEST:
a!///-,, __ , -, .,-*A. ,/ ;' +4Mxo~7d. ---
(q7J
JA~ZS c . I-IAGAPLVI,;' "ss~c,&&x~
. Anrsnn~ PLANNXI;~G CO~VISSION / ;: 7
-6- PC RESO ti615
x'
., 9 0
,- e
STAFF REFORT
DAYE : :larch 26, 1980
Pl.annin9 Conmi ss ion
F R@P! : Bud Plender, Planning Department
SUEJEC'I': CT 75-9 (13) , (3IEVISION) , SANTA F'E KNOLLS,
LA COSTA LAND CO~~~lPA?JJ!
-I
To: ff
The property is located east of Rancho Eanta Fe Xoad, south
of La Costa Avenue extension. The subd.ivision is for 211
lots. The original subdivision xas approved in Jar?uary ,
1977, as one phase. Earlier this year the Planninq
Corimission recommended approval of a revision to provide
5 phases, (CT 75-9 (A).) . .
The CT 75-9(A) was forwarded to the City Council for their
final. action. However, t5e City Council did not heax
the iterr. because the applicant did not quarantee that ?ublic
facilities would be provide?<, per City Council Policy No. 17.
The application was tabled. pendinq further City Ccuncil
review of the matter.
acquired additiofial sewer permits and redesi?.ned the
subdivision from 5 to 4 phases.
The applicmt withdrew CT 75-913) from the City Council aqenda
and requested the revised ghasing plan bz resubpitted to the
revised phasing and made necessary xodification to the original conditions approved by the Flanning Commission per
Resolution No. 1571. Also, staff added 3 new conditicns
regarding dedication of the park site, resolution cf the
school site, and modification in phasing.
All these modifications are contained in the attached draft
Plannixg Comxission Pesolution No. 1615. The park dedication
condition is Condition KO. 3 (the criginal 3rd condition of
Xesolution No. 1571 was not necessary). Park dedicatioE
is required by the La Costa Parks Aureeyent, and this
condition clarifies the matter.
Condition TJo. 12 has been act-ded requirinq the applicant to
reach an agreement with tile San Dieguito Iiigh Sc'nool District
to resolve status of the reserved school cite. The original
During the tabled period the aF@icant '
. Planning Corrmission as CT 75-9 (E). Staff has reviewed the
,- ., 0 0
condition on this school site for CT 75-3, per City Counci.1 Resolution No. 4072 indicated that the site be offered for
dedication to -the district. The new wording as proposed in
subject application is consistent with City Council action
on the approval of the recent La Costa Master Plan Amendment
(MF-l49(A) involving a school site in the San Marcos
School District.
The plan as subnitted, (Exhibit "X") indicates that access
to "GI' Street in Unit No. 2 is through Unit No., 3. This
means that off site ircprovements are required for Unit No. 2 to provide access t.o '*GI' Street. Condition No. 13 has been
added to require this off site improvement.
For your infornation, attached is the staff report an6
Planning Com.ission Resolution from your previous action on
CT 75-9 (A) . Also, staff prepared. the resolution in the
subject request so you could take action on the Zocument
after the action on the hearin?.
Xecommendation
It is recommended that the Planning Comnission APFROVE
CT 75-3(A) and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1616.
Exhihi ts
Planr,liig Cormission Resolution No. 1615
Planning Cormission Iiesolution No. 1571
Staff Report of Noverrher 28, 1979
City Council Iiesolution No. 4072
Exhibit "X" dated Xarch 11, 1980
_I_.-
BP : ar
3/20/80
-2- '
*..
L
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
\e ”.
PLANPIING CO?LYISSiON RESOLUTION NO. 1571 I
A RESOLUTION CF THE PLANYJING COPIMISSION OF TME CITY 0
CARLSBAD r CALIFORNIA, RCCOPNEKDITJG APPROVAL OF A
REVISION TO AN EXISTING TENTATIVE MAP TO PROTTIDE FOR
THE PHASING OF A 211 LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED SOUTH OF
LA COSTA AVENUE, EAST OF RAKCHO SANTA FE.
CASE NO. : CT 75-9 (A) /CP-16
APPLICANT: Santa Fe Knolls
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property,
g
10
to wit:
A portion of lots 4, 5, 2, 9, and 10 of Rancho Las
11
Encinftas as shcwn on Map No. 848, as filed in the Office of the County Recorder for San Diego County.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
as provided by Title 21 of the Car1sb.d Municipal Code; ar
WHEREAS, this project has been processed through
environmental review as required in Title 19, the Envirom
Protection Ordinance, The proposed subdivision has complj
with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protec
Ordinance through prior compliance (Section 19.04.153)
because:
1, An Environmental Impact Report (EIR-307) was prepare( for amendments to the La Costa Master Plan and certi
by the City Council on April 27, 1976;
A supplement to that EIR has been prepared for the
proposed project in conformance with the requirement
of the Master Plan;
I
2.
3. A report, Archaeological Investigations at Santa Fe
has been accepted which mitigates the impacts of the
proposed project on the archaeological resources of
project site: and
--
8,. *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
'0 "y
4. There are no substantial changes in the proposed proje
which have not been adequately addressed by the Master
or Supplemental EIRs.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 28th
day of November, 1979, hold a duly noticed, public hearing
as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
1\7HEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pel
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all facto]
relating to the revised tentative tract map (CT 75-9(A)) ax
found the following facts and reasons to exist:
Findings
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan
because :
a) The project density of 3 dwelling units per acre
conforms with the Land Use Element designation o
residential low-medium density, 0-4 du/acre; and
b) The project does not conflict with any element o
..
the general plan.
2) The site is physically suitable for the type and dens
of development because:
a) The subdivision has been designed recognizing th
r?atural slope and soil constraints of the site;
and
b) The low density of 3 du/acre allows for the phyT
consideration of the site,
3) An environmental impact report (EIR-307) was preparec
for amendments to the La Costa Master Plan and certif by the City Council on April 27, 1976;
A supplement to that EIR has been prepared for the
proposed project in conformance with the requirement:
of the Master EIR;
A report, Archaeological Investigations at Santa Fe 1
has been accepted which mitigates the impacts of the
proposed project on the archaeological resources of .
project site; and
.2
’.
* I.
3,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
26
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
. 25
26
27
28
t. e t*
There are no substantial changes in the proposed pro:
which have not been adequately addressed by the Mast<
or Supplemental EIR’S.
4) This project is consistent with all public facility
policies and ordinances because:
a) Sewer service is not available fcr this project
this time. The Planning Commission has, by incl
of an appropriate condition, insured that the
final map for each phase shall not be approved
unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. fn addition,
condition has been added requiring that a note 1
placed on the final nap that building permits nc
not be issued unless the City Engineer determinc
that sewer service is available.
Since the final map cannot be approved unless
sewer service is available, the building cannot
occur within the project unless sewer service
remains available, the requirements of the publj
facilities element of the General Plan have beer met insofar as they apply to sewer service for
this and tenative map approval.
b) Agreements have been made with both Encinitas ar
San Dieguito Unified School District to pay schc
fees.
c) Water service will be provided by Olivenhain
Municipal Water District.
d) Gas and electric service will be provided by
SDG&E.
e) All necessary on-site and adjacent public facili
would be required as per the City’s Public Iinprc
Ordinance or as conditions of approval.
I
f) At this time, all other public facilities necesc
to serve this project will not be available conc
with need. The Planning Commission has, by incl
of an appropriate condition, required that the
project contribute to the cost of such facilitie
Since the developer will pay for its proportion;
share of the public facilities which it will
require, the Planning Commission is satisfied ti
the requirements of the public facilities elemer
of the general plan have been satisfied.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the following vc
recommended approval of CT 75-9(A), subject to certain COI
.3
.' j
3,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g
10
3.1
12
13
\-. \e
Conditions
1) Approval is granted for CT 75-9(A) as shown in Planni
Commission CT 75-9(A) Exhibit A, dated 11/13/79, on
file in the Planning Department, and incorporated her1
by reference. Development shall be substantially as
shown on said Exhibits.
2) All conditions of CT 75-9 (City Council Resolution Eo
4072) are still in effect, except as otherwise noted
herein,
3) Only folmr model homes shall be permitted as per Secti
21.60.030,
4) The applicant shall provide evidence that school fees
have been paid prior to issuance of building permits,
5) This subdivision is approved upon the express conditi
that the final map shall not be approved unless the
City Council finds at the time of such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision.
6) This subdivision is approved upon the express conditi
that building permits will not be issued for developm
14
15
16
a7
l8
of the subject property unless the City Engineer dete
that sewer facilities are available at the time of
application for such permits and will continue to be
available until time of occupancy. If -the City Engin
determines that sewer facilities are not available,
building permits will not be issued,
7) Conditions 23 & 24 of City Council Resolution No. 407
are deleted and replaced as follows: I
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Mission Estancia arid La Costa Avenue shall be dedicat
and graded on the basis of an 84 foot right of way pl
slope easements as required, Improvements shall
consist of full improvements to city standards for a
foot half street, including street lights. Addition: at each intersection with Rancho Santa Fe Road and fc
a distance of 100 feet, the pavement shall be widenec to a minimum of 40 feet and a taper from the 40 foot
width to the 32 foot width of at least 200 feet shall
be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
All slopes adjacent to the streets shall be 2:l maxin
Mission Estancia shall be constructed from Rancho Sar
Fe Road to the intersection with "1" Street concurrer
with Unit No. 1 of the subdivision. Mission Estanci;
shall be constructed from "I" Street to the proposed
Costa Avenue intersection concurrent with Unit No. 3
the subdivision.
La Costa Avenue shall be Constructed concurrent with
Unit No. 3 of the subdivision.
I
.4
L.
1 .* .'
J
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
'-.
(- -0 (e
The applicant shall. enter into a secured agreement €or
improvencnt of the northerly half of Mission Estancia
along the proposed park site frontage to City of Carls
standards.
8) Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be widened and/or striped t
provide a separate southbound left turn lane into
Mission Estancia and a separate northbound right turn
lane into the street. The widening and/or striping
shall extend approximately 600 feet north of the intersection and approximately 400 feet south and shal
be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
This work shall be accomplished with the construction
of Unit No. 1 of the project-
The eastern half street of Rancho Santa Fe Road shall
be improved at the intersection of La Costa Avenue
sufficient to provide turning moves in and out of La
Costa Avenue and shall be designed to the satisfactio
of the City Engineer. This work shall be accomplishec
concurrently with the construction of La Costa Avenue
9) The applicant shall pay a public facility fee as
established in City Council Policy No. 17 prior to
issuance of building permits, This approval is expres
conditioned upon the applicant entering into a secure(
agreement to secure payment of this fee prior to appri
of the resolution for CT 75-9(A) by the Planning Corn
LO) Brush clearance shall be provided around the edges of
each unit to the satisfaction of the City of Carlsbad
Fire Plarshall.
11) A looped water line shall be installed from rrHrr Stree
in Unit $3 to "F" Street in Unit %2, to the satisfact
of the City of CarlsSad Fire Marshall. This line sha
be installed concurrent with the development of Unit
#3.
AYES: Schick, Rombotis, Jose, Leeds, MarcusI
Friestedt, Larson
NOES : None
NOFT, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the foregc b '
p#\/ rC\ ' / [\-b\L ..J --Ai ?]LC I\ f
recitations are true and correct.
DTilIN S . SC€IICK , JRL ,
ATTEST : CARLSBAD PLANNING COP
/
Y4-=2&y yf7 /' 0/,,4< 2 ,e >JAMES C . IiAGAIJAN, Se'c!retary
GARLSBAD PLANNING COfih3ISSION
/ .5 . i
I
, - .. ’ %,
..
3,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
[e t:, e
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss
CITY OF CAKLSBAD 1
I, JAPES C. HAGAYGIN, Secretary to the Planning Comiii.ss
of the City of Carlsbad, California, do hereby certify that
foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, approved and sdop
by the Planning Commission held on the 33th day of February
1980, by the follo~ing roll call vote:
AYES: Schick, Rombotis, Jose, Leeds, Marcus, and Lars
NOES: None
ABSTAIN : None
ABSENT: None
and Friestedt
X
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
l6 I
26 25
(q r;?” d/<<,;7/7 +?0+-~fl-y&..z&- /,AP.IES C. TIAGMJAN < Secretary
ARLSBAD PLANNING CO-WlISSIO
PC RES0 #1571 $P 1’’
Page 6
I
27
28 .6
I [o b
STAFF REPORT
DATE : November 28, 1979
TO : Planrxinq Commission
FROM : Planning Departnent
RE : CT 75-9(A)
APPLICANT: Santa Fe Knolls
REQUEST: Revision to an existing tentative map
to provide for phasing for a 211 lot subdivision.
BACKGROUND
Location and Description of Property
The subject property is located south of La Costa Avenue
and east of Rancho Santa Fe. The proposed subdivision will require an extension of La Costa Avenue. The property
contains 70 acres and features rolling topography with
scattered natural vegetation.
A high school site has been designated for the southeastern
portion of the property. Ro changes have been proposed for
the lots or streets; this application is for phasing only.
Existing Zonikg
Subject Property: PC
North: PC
South: PC
East : PC
West: PC
Existing Land Use
Subject Property: Vacant
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant West: Vacant
EnvironmentaL :,pact Information
The proposed subdivision has complied with the requirements
of the CarLsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance through
Prior Compliance, (Section 19.04.153) because:
*. . b '.
a) An Environmental Imi>act Report (EI2-307) was prepared
for amendments to the La Costa Mzister Plan and certified
by the City Council on April 27, 1976;
b] A supplement to that EIX has been prepared for the
proposed project in conformance with the requirements
of the Master EIR;
c) A report, Archaeoloqical Investigations at Santa Fe Knolls has been accepted which mitigates the impacts of the
proposed project on the archaeological resources of the
project site; and
d) There are no substantial changes in the proposed project
which have not been adequately addressed by the Plaster
or Supplemental EIR'S.
General Plan Information
A. Land Use Element
-
This property is designated as RLM, Residential Low arid
Medium Density, 0-4 du/acre. The proposed 211 units on
70 acres of land has a density of 3 dwelling units per
acre.
B. Public facilities
1) Sewer: Sewer service will be providcd by the Leucadia
County Water District. At this time, only 50 sewer
units have been provided. However, as per Section
21.49.020(10), revisions of approved tentative maps are
permitted under the planning moratorium, This revision
will provide for phasing which will allow the use of
the 50 edu's.
2) Schools-. The applicant has entered into agreements
withthe San Dieguito Unified and Encinitas Union School
Districts to pay fees to mitigate conditions of over-
crowding.
3) Water: Water service will be provided by the Olivenhain
Municipal Water District.
4) Gas & Electric: These services will be provided by San
Diego Gas & Electric.
5) On-site and __ Adjacent Public Facilities: All necessary
on-site and adjacent public facilities would be required as per the City's Public Improvement Ordinance or as
conditions on either the original approval or on this
approval o
-2-
c. I.
6) Other Public Facilities: All other public facilities
necessary to serve this project will not be available
concurrent with need. The Planning Commission may, by inclusion of an appropriate condition, require that the
project contribute to the costs of such facilities
accordhg to City Council Policy No. 17. Since the development would pay its appropriate share of the
public facility it would require, the Planning Commission
could be assured that the requirements of the Public
Facilities Element of the General Plan would be satisfied
tine of building permit issuance. , In addition, park-in-lieu fees would be assessed at the
Past History and Related Projects
CT 75-9, Santa Fe Knolls, City Council Resolution No. 4072,
Planning Cornmission Resolution No, 1297.
On January 4, 1377, the City Council approved this 211 lot
subdivision. The current proposal is a request to add
phasing to this subdivision.
Concerns at hhe time of approval included the park site
(Stagecoach Park), the high school site, the extensive
amount of grading and maintenance of Ran-made slopes.
Major Planning Considerations
1) Will the proposed phasing have any effects on the
No other changes are requested.
>
conditions of CT 75-9? Primarily concerning land-
scaping of slopes and open space and street dedication and improvement.
2) Should any new conditions be added to account for
changes in requirements since the original CT 75-9 was
adopted in January, 1377?
Discussion
The only change in this tentative map is the addition of
phasing to an already approved project. shows 5 phases, The first four phases contain 50 units each
with the fifth phase havinq only 11 units and the high school
site, were slope maintenance, the high school site and the park site
The phasing is done in 50 unit increments due to'the restricti
on the number of sewer units available. This limitation, in
addition the original configuration of the subdivision, has resulted in unusual phasing units, lJnit 1 is in the south- westernmost corner and includes seven lots on "D" Street.
Four of these will be model homes. This will allow the models
to face Rancho Santa Fe Road, and since the opposite side of t
street will not be constructed until Phase 5, the models wi.11 be visible from Rancho Santa Fe,
The tentative map
Concerns on this project when first approved in 1977
-3-
=. =e . The remainder of uiiit 5 is at the very north end of the
subdivision.
The other units were designed to accommodate the allowed 50 units in the Kost logical manner possible.
confined each phase to as small an area as possible. Most other configurations would result in piecemeal street con-
struction by not developing all the units on a particular
street.
The original -&native map approval required that the park
site be offered prior to final nap. In addition, the school site was to have been offered to the San Dieguito Unified
School District, The offer has been made to the school
district, Condition 23 and 21 of City Council Resolution
No. 4072 required the dedication and improvement of La Costa
Avenue and Mission Estancia. These conditions have been
altered to allow Eor the phasing and changes in traffic. The improvements will be increased from 28' to 32' half
street improvements on Mission Estancia.
will be constructed from Rancho Santa We to "I" Street
concurrent with Unit 1. La Costa Avenue will be constructed
and Flission Estancia extended to La Costa Avenue concurrent
with development of Unit 3. In addition, left turn and
right turn pockets will need to be provided on Rancho Santa
Fe. This will require either striping or road widening.
New conditions include those regarding sewer availability,
the public facilities fee and brush clearance and a looped water line for protection.
Recornendation
Staff recommends APPROVAL of CT 75-9(A) based on the following
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findin'gs
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan
The applicant
!?ission Estancia
because :
a) The project density of 3 dwelling units per acre
conforms with the Land IJse Element designation of
residential low-medium density, 0-4 du/acre; and
b) The project does not conflict with any element of
the general plan.
2) The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development because:
a) The subdivision has been designed recognizing the
natural slope and soil constraints of the site;
and
b) The lok7 density of 3 du/acre allows for the physical
consideration of the site.
-4-
k e ". .'
'. 3) An environmental impact report (EIR-307) was prepared
for amendments to the La Costa Plaster Plan aild certified
by the City Council on April 27, 1976;
A supplement to that EIR has been prepared for the
proposed project in conformance with the requirements
of the Master EIR;
A report, Archaeoloqical Investigations at Santa Fe Knolls
has been accepted which mitigates the impacts of the
proposed project on the archaeological resources of the project site; and
There are ao substantial changes in the proposed project
which have not been adequately addressed by the Master or Supplemental EIR' S.
This project is consistent with all public facility
policies and ordinances because:
a) Sewer service is not available for this project at
this time. The Planning Commission has, by inclusioi
of an appropriate condition, insured tbat the
final map for each phase shall not be approved
unless the City Council finds that sewer service
is available to serve the project. In addition, a
condition has been added requiring that a note be
placed on the final map that building permits may not be issued unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available,
Since the final map cannot be approved unless sewer service is available, the building cannot
occur within the project unless sewer service
remains available, the requirements of the public facilities element of the General Plan have been
met insofar as they apply to sewer service for
this and tenative map approval.
Agreements have been made with both Encinitas and
San Dieguito Unified School District to pay school
fees.
4)
b)
c) Water service will be provided by Olivcnhain
Municipal Water District.
Gas and electric service will be provided by
SDG&E. d)
e) All necessary on-site and adjacent public facilities
would be required as per the City's Public Improvemc Ordinance or as conditions of approval.
-5-
go to I( -.
i-
f) At this time, all other public facilities necessary to serve this project will not be available concurrent with need. Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate
condition, required that the project contribute
to the cost of such facilities. Since the development
will pay for its proportionate share of the public
facilities which it will require, the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the
public facilities element of the general plan have
been satisfied.
The Planning
- Conditions
I) Approval is granted for CT 75-9(A) as shown in Exhibit
A, dated 11/13/79, on file in the Planning Department,
Approval shall be substantially as shown.
2) All conditiolzs of CT 75-9 (City Council Resolution No,
4072) are still in effect, except as otherwise noted herein.
Only four model homes shall be permitted as per Section
21.60.030.
The applicant shall provide evidence that school fees
have been paid prior to issuance of building permits.
This subdivision is approved upon the express condition
that the final map shall not be approved unless the
City Council finds at the time of such approval that
sewer service is available to serve the subdivision,
3)
4)
-
5)
6) This subdivision is approved upon the express condition
that building permits will not be issued for development
of the subject property unless the City Engineer determir
that sewer facilities are available at the time of
application for such permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. If the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are not available,
building permits will not be issued.
7) Conditions 23 & 24 of City Council Resolution No. 4072
are deleted and replaced as follows:
Mission Estancia and La Costa Avenue shall be dedicated and graded on the basis of an 84 foot right’ of way plus
slope easements as required. Improvements shall consist
of full improvements to city standards for a 32 foot
half street, including street lights. Additionally at
each intersection with Rancho Santa F’e Road and for a
distance of 100 feet, the pavement shall be widened to
a minimum of 40 feet and a taper from the 40 foot width
to the 32 foot width of at least 200 feet shall. be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All
slopes adjacent to the streets shall be 2:l maximum,
'. "..
Mission Estancia shall. be constructed from Rancho Santa
Fe Road to the intersection with "I" Street concurrent
Mith Unit No. 1 of the subdivision. P4isslon Estancia
shall be constructed from "I" Street to the proposed La
' Costa Avenue intersection concurrent with Unit No. 3 of
the subdivision.
La Costa Avenue shall be constructed concurrent with
Unit No. 3 of the subdivision.
The applicant shall enter into a secured agreenent for
improvement of the northerly half of Mission Estancia
along the proposed park site frontage to City of Carlsbad
standards.
8) Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be widened and/or striped to provide a separate southbound left turn lane into
Mission Estancia and a separate northbound right turn
lane into the street. The widening and/or striping
shall extend approximately 600 feet north of the intersec
and approximately 400 feet south and shall be designed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This work
shall be accomplished with the construction of Unit No.
1 of the project,
The eastern half street of Rancho Santa F'e Road shall
be improved at the intersection of La Costa Avenue
sufficient to provide turning moves in and out of La
Costa Avenue and shall be designed tc the satisfaction
of the City Engineer. This work shall be accomplished
concurrently with the construction of La Costa Avenue.
9) The applicant shall pay a public facility fee as establis
in City Council Policy No, 17 prior to issuance of
building permits, This approval is expressly conditioned
upon the applicant entering into a secured agreement to
secure payment of this fee prior to approval of the resolution for CT 75-9(A) by the Planning Commission.
10) Brush clearance shall be provided around the edges of
each unit to the satisfaction of the City of Carlsbad
Fire Marshall.
11) A looped water line shall be installed from ''€3" Street,
in Unit $3 to 'IF" Street in Unit 22, to the satisfaction
of the City of Carlsbad Fire Plarshall. This line shall be installed concurrent with the development of Unit
#3.
Exhibits
Exhibit A, dated November 13, 1379
Location Map
City Council Resolution No. 4072.
-7--
KL : ar
'- (e : .< c0
'., b
I, .. .. n
;I ,, * -.
LA cosm AVE
*
..
MI SSID N E STA ri c i t>
-. . ..
Lpc -i5z5-Gk wc)a-
*.
.i.
.. - .. .. . . .
" L'OCd7'!0~ I- flap.
-- lrplrriss
3-M E.?. %,/? J
Coast Permit Area:
2
3.
.7
-4
7 Gi
I" I
8
Q
10
m:;oI,!jT:[:cN NO. 4 01 7
I -_-. ..
, A ]:I.:f;fj:f,U:j.'%O?] 0:' 'i'Jl'E CIf?'*:{ C013flC,I% UT?.- TIIT:
CZ'J.'>' 0:: (~,7d?l',Sj~.i..I) ; C.?\L?: 1.-'021\1 X;i, ZiT'P!:GVINC
WL 'fJ.j C:Ci:< i3 I 'j' T. fi ;.: :7 'j'~~~~.~'I'j'I'I':C TI 12 I?X?
GE]..! J.:R7,.:!.J,!! i.,93c;..'?J3!) Ozi7 '.:.'iX 33:S'f SIi:l!3 OP
AL7E:?jX .-- !:,>; )) r .f,:,l .-.& '.? ,., ; ! -; . . ;)?I . - 2 il, .? 1) o]:, :[I,? j;;: Ill\ ;;-I; ] < C-??1,; -
nppx.,:r(:/';T-!?.' : . L,A cos'i'i? I,.q;.iii cc; PAX\: .
( C7' -1 5 - 3 ) FOJ1 2'; 23..'!-3;07' 5\1'-'-' ;,!I -. l.l,'jLSl(;1.J O>J IJ]?(J;.;:<j<'J.':+r . I I
EA].': (: 1 'i c j s j'\>];! 'j.';\- 1'!< li@jr\ 13 J31<'5\Tl< J: I.< I,,% c (1 r; ?.'A I
c_ __._____-___ _I __________________.._____.____._- ___._- -_---I-
L'IXX~?AS, ofi Xcl-vexlie:- 22 i 1.976 I th~! CarI..c;f;r,d Cj-ty :?la1
1 Ccjnxi:;si.cin ~deptcd l?c!so:t.u.tion XO r 1297 ~CCOXI~~~~~!'~CL.I.I?CJ to ,. the (1: - :
1 , Cou;?c:il thak ~entntivc l'iap (C'T 75-3) ?x eondj.ti.onaJ..ly app::o\~(
I 2:nd ..
T.?TJEY~:CA.S I the City CouncFI or' the City of Czr 3.~b5.d~ 01
* ..
D
e: m 3% 13 -K g < c'. = C)
[ C(>'".."' ,,t.ti~~~j-~n; 2nd .. -.
\
z <i '< e' . r: --
7 u (1, , I- -1 x:?
>.u '
t- 18
I9
; :;
0
' . 20 ..i
. 2l.1
2 2
23
! I .~--o 13.2 i1-1 p:i-i.~-:~; c~i;l;?.'~i?>.~:ce yq i->.]i the ~rit17 of CzrI..;1:)a.c3 !~~v.~-~oI-JT~.I
; j?>:otcct:iolx 03:cIill&i:ci! of 1972;
1
I
I. NOW, TIIE~I?ORB, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council o
i cj.t:y Cjf Carl.,.T,b,ltd aS fOll:OV?S:
A. hat i:lic ab0x.r~ xc:zi-tatj,on :; c?se truc .. and CC):CXC.
B . T]iat :;;i<.d fl'eni;stive ?sI~)-p, to~c'cl~c:: \~i-I:h t31~ 1.j:::
t
!
jTor j.tS fiCSiC,rl'l a;>(:! ~.j~,~>J~~~7C!l~~~]l~: sild SUbj ec'i to tl)c! CoI-Jd~t~ <>l'i::
25
2 G
2'1
20
:;pecj 5ic p.la11s 0.f the City of Car1sb;ict.
~1i;lt .L] I cf f ill;? i. J 1 <j :; G E th c? 1.' I. ;I 11 1'1 j- lici Co;nl?\ j. s L; i.0 11 C.
T:csol.ut:ioll x<o.
i 1.1 t.Ii;.s ~n;it.tcs.
1237 cons Litutc? t1lC fi.i,.~<1.i.ngs of Ll,c city c:ou1-
.
.. ,
1
2
3
4
5
7
e 7~ 7 9
3- 8
*
11. 1 That '2c:iik~kive I.itlj? (CT 75-3) j-s 1ic:rebg app~:ovc:i
~~1.b j ~C-L to all app1icidiI.e re~v.:i-rcimnt:.; of the ~arl.sb;:d ~ii~i~c.~-~
Ceric and to the satisfaction ~f tlic: fo7l-ow3.ng conclisions :
.. .. .
1. The npprov;i1 is cjran.tc?c'l. for the lalld d~:~cril.)P.c3 i.:
apI?:!icc?.i:j.o1i axG ;:.~t;;cl~:;:ents t.hcse-Lc=, and as show
. the pl.ot p1;n su!i~n:'it.t.cd r :L;>l;~ic:C ~:~h~.~~it "A" , da.
f i 11 it I IW p s 1.1 a 1 1- 11 E: s u?:)ini -t kc Ct for app x- ovi; 1. w :i. tb :i IL
Cj-ty Cou;ic:il. I ar:d shall bc: in sul~stani:i.;il. coi1foi-: with the ten takive subdivisioa r.-,;,np, Exhihit "A" s
2. . Street .ntm~?s sha1-L be desiynatcd in ~ccordc~iice w
City C0tiiic.i 1. Po1.i.cy 20 and shall be ;ippr.c!ved by
Planning Di-rect.or px-:ior to a;3proval of the fi12a2
NOVcIThCY 16 I 1976 r eXCi.?k 25; iIldj.Cd?-C<?. hC2ly@$n. '
eiy}]i-ccp, TT,311 LjlS fl:c.-.I ,1.1 tllt2 C'i;1tc of fiI-L?.l. c?,CtiOi.! by
' .
1%
3. . Conc:~xren-L .i(ith ftnal. map c?,pp~~val, the applicnn
I slia:1-3. cjr;x-!k 2:) o?c!-i spzce eascr!~.~n-k for rn;:j.ntc?r;aa
19
27.
22
. '.- 2o
j :. irrigation plar! to the Parks and Recreation Dj-rc
,, for his approval. The' plan shall-:
.. (a) Covcr tl1ose sEo;:,c:; 2-11 excess 02 . f-i ._ v-- L* fcct .
]1c?ight Lit the: 2-eGI:' cmd tllr. s.i.dc:; OE l.oi-..; w:
I .' I
the toe of suc!~ sI:opo.; Ts ad jac:eii.k to pub?-.
. r 5- q 1 1.1: s -- o ? -t:;iy - 5
. 22,
24
25
,' 26
' ' 27
28
( 13 f u t :i. 1.5. %. c 2 i 1:c: *- rc? t 2 r c? 2 I 1 .'c r d 1: 0 ll CJ 11 'i - IC. s :'L L; .L 31-1 .I:
s c ap <.I1 rj ';I h ic 11 5.11 c l\1tIc I; t 1: (rf (2 s it 11 cl s I1 r Ub s wI.1 renclt a variety of size:; at mai-.vrity; r:rzcl
Uti].i:<e an j.i:ri.gakion :;y~;Lcrn appi;opi::~.ai:c F
]nn.:i.i it c'11 ;.I 11 cc o 2 t 11 c xccjx, i r cd 3. anti s cai? i ;I CJ .i. 11
CO~~~OL.I~;~~ICC w:~th Con(li.ti.oiis G , 7 ancl I).
.I (c)
6. e Pc?j:rriainc11.[: 3.antlr;cap.;-1.i<J ,?lid ~.2:X'~.~Jilkj.OI~ :;ha 1-1- I><? j,
011 a.1.1. lot:; .i.dcnt.i.f:i.(iii in C01idit~.01i 5 (a) hfor( 02 tho:;(: :t.ots arc oc;cupi~?d . If rcs:i dctnirial cor
2.
. ., 1.;.:,. .x
2
:I ". : fe
tion oc:c:urs in uiiitc;, t11.i:; . conc~i.i.ioii sha1.l. ht. rnc
on ii GI) i t--h;l-uni ?: j3iisi.s. 4. . I .. . 1' 7. Prior to i:lie ~:;:;I:LII-ICC OE hui1d.inq permits, the p
4
5
G
0 7~ 81
arcas ti:; LncJ.i.caic-:d in Conc'iition 5 s1ial.I bc ass~x a mc:nn:;r :icc:~pt;~I~?~c to t?ie ~rity Couilcil .)
,8. ' VecJe-ix-kj.cii~ .c3_(1!a=.i.ng o;~c:rc-~toii:s sha1 1. be mad2 no than -hja weeks in ~~..?dv;tncc . of grnd:i 1-19.
IJO gs~i.i3.ng shal:~. occur du:t:.i_-~g the p.icn i,.i-is of J,?!-IL
1-12 ro u y h ! i x:- ch , EX c: ,-->pt wli cm spe c i a 1. rnc ci sure s cm
taI:c?n to c:cjntrol_ si.~.i:ation. 'rrhis coritiiti c):: :jllc%I met to the sattsf:::c i7i.011 of. t!he City Enginc?cr $
.. 9 .
L I'
10 li.1-1- gTiided SLll^fi>.C:<?S shall, be atere red nlld r~llcd
t :-
12
1% n Coacui;rcni-. v?it;h f ina 1. nap ~rccorda.I::'.on the sp~? ?-j.(
- shall dcc!:'ica'i-.c P.i:c?a ''A" to the City of Carls!n:d 1
6'
19
20
2 1
. 14, All chzinage easenents shall. be improved hy a c
1 or drai.na(jc chaniiel of .adequai-..e size I whichevel:
,' requii-cd by the San Diego County Dc:p&r-tl-n,eni; 6f
San.i,tAtic)n an,rl pl.00~3 coni-.rol v VJherc! a drair~z.qc
. channc3. is ~.-cquircci, s\.rc:h cl-ic'.i~l1~:3. ~1.1rrf.J. b: :Line- a stij.<:Lt]>]-p. ~i;:.teriaI 2s spZci2ic6 by tilt: Coxiji.I::;r
I
' D~!p;;~~~:1i:~l i ->. C) f S 2 11 i .L;: k j-0~1 n11d X.~OOC? CC;I II:IO :L . h :
- 2Bi
-. "I
25
2?
, 86
27
28
e21 s C:IY!C: 11 t. s F:II ~i 11 I:)? I~.ID~I[U~LC?II t<! ~l a .t(.:i?cj I:)I:O j3e ~:t.y 1.:
at 10 C 2t.k i. ij i? S ;1 j?j> ]:<>\T <? d- ]>.f .::h 5 c OU I) <:y 13 C]> ai: <:J 11 C: I 1 -k
S it!i 5. til t j. on a11 (1 Y Io o:l Coil t. :cij :I. . An a c c e :; s c ;IC; ctril:
.5-:-!213. 1):: provi cTc?c! to each drailiaC~(:l :;y..;tc.rn i-,!Lli11: *. Cic CC 5 5; JJ 0 :i 11 t- not: (1 :;, 3TC C tl. 1' Ll C!CC s s 3.1.) .I. c 2 ):01)1 Li ]:'\11
IfO(7(3\.)):!\), SafLc3. iicCe:;I; f2~l~~(~l~l~>l~~k sh;J..l.1 hC ]?.?Lvcd 21
;i 3. :i. <J 11 c (1 t 0 ti I ; e s i : .t j. :; f ac t :i. c: i.1 o f k11 cs (2 01.1 1.1 ty Dc: 1;) it I
' of ~cini(x[:i(~n and 1~'loocl Oontxcsl. 1
3.5 . . .Add .i i-.j. Q!: ;I 1. <!y~-? <.I 1 nil e ci~i SC]:::C: j-1 t:; n11d d 1:<1 j-1) i~ <Ic S 1:J:
S Z~U i i-. < t ti
* shal.1 bc: p1:0vic1..x~ or ins (:a?.1.cd as luay be rcqui
1 jy .t: 1 1 i? .c, ii i.1 12 .i c !10. co 0.1 1 .ty 11 (.:I.> il L- t:l\lc 11 t o I;-
anti P1.uocl Cont1:ol..
I. 3, .'
*-'
~I
Y
zI 3
e.
4
5
61
G ril
3.0 91
I 2.
1%
2 8 33
CJ <. VI
0 gz z
0 c, ? $
.... i
I
16. ]\I-]- SIJX~~CC it^^)^^; OJ::L~JI.TI;;,L~ II~ .. ~::5. kkii.n f;hc SUt:\Cti~,j
and al:i. :;iirfac;e ~~+;itcr:; tli;i\: may flew on LO {-.lie SI-
clivi.::j.c:n fro;il adj ;:cent llids sll~t.7.1 JJC? .d.i.;i?oscd c
a driti 11 ci2 e :; y S LC PI sa i: j. s
Dcp;::it:inc:-it of Sanitation ;:i-,c? Flood Conti-oJ..
IcLo1-y to ehc s2n IIiqu
1.7 e That portion of ?:xhibjk "Ti1' , dated P.!SVCTI~>CI~ R.G , .
?Label(>ii I1iYl.L sc!iool. Sj.tC,
hc oj':cc.?red f@X. ~1..c7,3.cil-~Li.o;.1 to the S;;n )3jXxJU.ikC) u1
shzll Le I.. incl.udc:'S. wit1
t 11~ I.)o~~.~-I (1:: r i c: s o f khc? f j. 1; i:. 2. SU?~ d LV :L :; 3 %O;I E\:);> ZXY~ d i i I IIigh School Dist:rj.ct. I
. . 3.8. If rc!quc::;tcd by the city !<iiginezr, an. aincnc?ted 'T'c
Map sI~L>I-I- be ~~?jj~~:'~-tt.cci for ~~~p~~\~t~l by the City
Encj5.3-1cer prior to rcviw7 of the fin2.l inap to as;
co:.rp:l.:'Lanc7c with all coiiditioas oE approvc2il.
1-9 . he ~~ocatri.oi.1 of fire hyd.1!c:n'is shatl. he zpp;:o-ijcd the ]?ire Piarsha!., In order to prov.i.dc_ foj: rezs
E ire 1) ro -i: e c t ion d u 3: i. 13 4 i; he con s I: I:' u C.L i o 1-1 pc I: iocl r sulki iv 2. Cct 2: s11 C'L 1 I in a in I-. a i 3-1 par, sa I.? 3.e ve h ic u 3. ci 3: z. c
. to all. I~LI.~-~.C~~I-~~S 2nd adequ.a'ie fire hydrants vJit
recjuj.re<; fj-12 f3-o~~ shall be in sc:r~.7ice an6 iicc
priox to .. the loca-;;ir;n of co~nl~u.s~til~,3.c.s on site Ij
I 20. ~~rn~;;n::.n.~~n:~. s'ircz-~ I.iq-I--Lj.nq- shal-1 be provi.(?ccl Zc
'. ... ' .:
j I
j i \
gZ20 L>% s2 - 1611
,> rc c.1 z 0 ' L?
4Q 5 E 2 . 3.7
u c 18.
19
20
- 21
22
0
23
24
25
26
27
20
divis io71 j.i-ito a ir~iiinten;ij>oe cIistric-2.
I I 21 = Til]. :~~.1:';3 ailC!/cjX ~;i~~>1~~~:i~t~ ~~:cluS.jrc:i sh2.13- be <?IC;
the ~ii:-y of . ~a-ishad, withau-t cost to the City
. free sf. al.1 LFcns and ~~CI;I;!~I-EUICC':S. No easernzs
shall be recorcicc? prior to recordation of the : 1. -: map unless approved by the City Engineer.
22 . ?'he ~.I-~:~~.-ovcI~c.I:~ and cjrc?,di.iig p.l.ms sh<iXl inc3.udi
repo::i: o:? q-c?cjI.oyi c:;il j-i.~~~~~;.~~j.~~~~t~ 03 ai~d a co:?ip:1 I
g3:;:(7.in!j p].an of i3ic eiiti.:t:c site , ~~licn xecIui:i:cd
City E::l>gir!c:c:xI Tlic ~epo~!: 2nd p:t;;)~ ~hal.1 1.)~ p
' . 1117 c5.vi. :: e;iq.i.:iccrs 1-j.c:c21-1:;cd 1-117 t-11~ S.L:atc. of Cci
~I-JC~ cxp~rienc(i1 5.1-1 cros:ton coni:~-ol. , who ~112 3-11
accc?pl:al:):l.e -LC) the C.i.tl7 I.~ng~.l~iCCX. 'J;h:>y s!!?i13. c;
d al; il VI?. i-. 1 'I f: u 3.3. con :; i. cl e I- ;I t i on of th c con s c:q i12n c
i-. 0 .~7h C! i. I-, c 1116 c cl n nc7, II c :i. 9 ?lI,o s- i ng p s ep:: 1 t ri. c: s a ti (3
C<)l.-J :~<,>l:N::ll c; c? Ig i th
I I .
,.
ti:af: .i:]-)c:y' l)c7'i;C. i llVCSti(Ji;-(lCC? khC .C;j-zL:C ?ilI,d ]?rC?]?;)
1
tll Cf Gco 3.0 9 i c 21-1 tl s (2 :i. SI!I i c :; i\ f C'J
' EJ.c!lnell~lr. of thc GC!n>?l:a.l. l'~il11.
I
3.3 . ..~~j.:;sioi~ ~s~;anci.a ~j.~~~~~.-~~~-~',,~~~~~, incl \icii.n<l C~O;>C . ]~~ci)-t:;, :.;ha].]- ?:w cttlrili.ci:[l:.cd ;ind girac1c:ij on the? 1,;
an c:~.'II.I.~~'-:['o\~L' Z<)oir. s t:rc:c; L :~cct.i0~1 f3:01\\ I'C~.~~.IC:I~C
I;'CI I?Oild to thc .i.ntc?l_':;cC',::i.~l~ wit11 fl:o]?or,cd 3.d (
Avc?nuc! . .
4,.
,.
. . x'
2
1.qism.oa 1;::t<:ricj.,~ slia1.1. be i.rnpx-o:cc? oJ) t.11~ basis (
a ~~~~~i.~~~--c!~~~~i~~ fc)ot :; i1:cet:. SCC tion froa Ra1-:c110 S(
Ipc Road -Lo tl~c ~I~~:P~::;cc~~cJII ~ith "I:" Stree i; . 1.Z.i.;
l<St;lllCi;t :;II?i11. bC2 i.Ti\j>I'OVC'tl (31) tile bC\Sj.S Of a. fO?!
3
4
5
'G
71
8
9
lo
%X
12
3 z 1-3
0 4' c>
C3 . I= r\' --- < c1) '0
two foob. h;i:if skrcct sc:ction frmn tlic? j.wLersect:L
tzitli ''A" $til pet to the intcrscction wit11 proposc
La costs zive?lL:e.
~inprovc~men~.:; s1.1a1.1. be as s~mvn on thc, tzi:tat.iv;lc
e>:c:cp'; t1;12t :jtr<>c'i. Iiyht.~ ~h~J-1- he ~Lncl.udcc? ~CCC
to City of C~rl-~h>d ~t;l?~cIz;l:d,; 2nd ::.tJ. s~.o;>c*s 2d-j
to the ~ixc:c...k siinll he 2 : 1. .i:izxi.uiux e
The appl.:i.zani-. .sha:!.~. entey into a sccurcd ac~1:~:c~~~~~~ for iri~p.rovc~~c!IC o,? -Lhe nor'cl-icr 117. 11~1-2 of KLSZ~OL x? $3 tan c; i. ;; a :l.ong t1.1 e prop o s c:! tl S trig c coa ch P xk s i t c
: frontage, to City of CarJ-,.r;barJ s'ian2arils.
24 + La C03t.a. live~uc r.i.~l1.t-o.~--.-~~~1~17, iriclvdincg :sloi?e ci.
' ment.5; I .sha:t 3. be dedricatccl znci .Ita Cor;-La P.ve~iue SI
. .c;cci:i.ort and i.inpirovcA 01-1 the 13ii.sis OF a 5orty-i.vJi
11a:I.f s'crc:et seci-.ion f:co!n R;l;.ncho Szn-La Fc Road -i-.l
I II t e r s c? (: t ri . c 11 '1~6 t h p 3: op o R c.. d 1.5 i. s s :i. on E r; i-. F;. 11 c i E . 7: I .rnents slia3.:!. be as sl.-io:.~;i *. on the teiikati7.ive 11;z.p~ e.
t h 2.t s t ~e e t: 1. i y!? t. s
City 02 ~~i~l:;J>i;~? s-tan3.ic?.:!:dsI i13.1 s1-0;~~ sG.~~c~I>!:
~ be gl_-s.Cied (jl? 'r.h~ 11; is of Tiri ci.~hty--Ir'oxir foot si 1
..
I 1
s 1-1 C: 1. I he i ;I c Lud 2 c? .~CCCI~~ i-. licrj I
* 19
-20/
' 2:L
2 5
2 4
25
FG
, 2'1
. 3
-: or a fully actuated trafEic signal at the irttc
'. of E'lission ~staiici.a ai?d ~ancho Santn ~e ~\o;td .- I
27. ~:1-1:? c-ix;tj.i:zqc sys-Lc?,il is no'r. app):o~~.d. 3.:; S?IG.Q~I; i
(>f st.<;>m d3:2j.a.?i, di.tchc.l:r-; I c;rc?s:; cJut-hesr:; , and 0: '. -
~l,j>~~rtc~~~ilc~~s sIltlJ.1 b~: as ZAPL)IO\YCC~ 011 .?.I>? i~i~p?~<
pli.llrs. 't .. ..'
I
- .2~. p,ll <-ffsj.tc? u~.iI.ity' e;iselncn.l;c; IICCC!:;SLII:>- to e>:{:
ui:j.:~j-t.y services to the s~-!l>ciiv:is;~..or~ , vhich ~~i.1-
v2j.i:hii-i :CLI~~.L~.I:C: publ.3.c skrcc-ir; , sl~all. I>e ~!IJC?C: su
LO k1.1~ f~it.~1~~~> l>~~blj.~ street ~i~SC1UCi-1'i w1ir;n tile
c cascmcnt is qI:i.int.cd.
. 29 . .~r:i.or to .thc.i.u ~ij>~~~~O\~i.ll- I irnprovc;ni~i-i~i; plai~s for . j?i.-op~~cd :;iiI~di~r.i s.i.01.1 :;hall. 1x2 su1;xj. l.{:(.>~l bo t11.c:
11 .i cgu i .to IJr I :i. f .i ct c'i 11 :L 91 1 S choo :t ! 15. .c; 1:1: j. c I: I: o r j- t :: .
2 E!,
to CIIL.;L~KC tllni: ;.lti<-:rlullte uL.i.l'i t-.)' ser.v:i.cc is tl\'il
to tl1c 1I.i.CJll sc1100.l. sit-c.
5. ,.
- ..
,, I -
*. . ' :t
2
3
4
5
G
7
30 . ~l.1- IX:JI-I~~.~ s1,opc::; oceurr-i.i-!g on .I:hc Iligh Sc?ioo:
site <is a rc:~Lll.t-. 01: the (;jl:<icl.il-Kj of I.otc; ;ll-Jd ilnpj
~cn'~s i.n t.:].!~: I:>~J.;~.I;(~C 0%; t1.1~ ~3~11~div.j ..;ion. sIi21.l.1 ii; niaximixn gi:~;cIes 02 2. 25: I, nnd sha3-3. be coni:o\ir 1 in to t 11 c c i; 11.5 ti !1 <j :.IS .tu 1: 23.1. s l0;3~ G . '1'1 ) c s e :a ;i r! -)II a{
s.Zopc:s i:v~,y be incrc;ased to 'a cjri;de of 2 e 0.0 : 1. L-i;;)(
approva]. of the :;a11 J)icgt;i.i:o Unified 1!icjh Schoo
llis-L>:j.ct.
Tlie ;i?j?I.< c:i?r, 'c sha 1.1 instal.1- ~CIXI~I~JC~I~~~ J.C~~I~SC~~.]?;.:
irr;.gzi:j on 011 s1.0;~~~~ s.!'.tu.;:.i-..ecJ- on tlic? Kigh S::hoo
and :;h,-23-l. ir~aink~< II s;:!uc an'ir.i..l ~;ucl.i ti.ine 2s. t-112 district c?c:ccpi:s t1:e clcd.i.cci:t.:i-an c)C tlic site 01:
.*
*a 31. .
2:L 147 the ~o3.B.oxj.ng vote, to wit:
AS' I;: s. : Cou~-ic.i?met~ Frazc-lc .. J Lcvri >, .- Packard and Skotn.