HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-06-03; City Council; 6249-1; DRIVE-THRU BANKING FACILITY CASE NO: SDP 77-01C APPLICANT: LA JOLLA BANK AND TRUSTrn CITY OF CARLSBAD a
/
1 AGENDA BILL NO-624 -9 - Su~~lement #1 Initial: Dept . Hd .
C. Atty. DATE: ,jITm ? 19,qn
DEPARTMENT Citv At- C. Mgr.
Subject : DRIVE-THRU BANKING FACILITY
CASE NO: SDP 77-1(C) APPLICANT: LA JOLLA BANK & TRUST _.
Statement of the Matter
The City Council, at your May 20, 1980 meeting, directed the City Attorney to prepare documents affirming the
Planning Corxnission'c!
of SDP 77-1(C) and denying the appeal of the condition limiting the number of drive-thru lanes from three to two.
A resolution in that regard is attached.
granting of CUP-177 and approval
Exhibit
Resolution No. &/ 9p .
Recommendation
If the City Council concurs, your action is to adopt Resolution No. b/9p .
Council Action:
6-3-80 Council adopted Resolution 5198, affirming Planning Commission decisio granting a CUP-177 for a drive-thru banking facility and approving a
site development plan (77-1(C)) on property located on the southeast corner of Dove Lane and El Camino Real and denying the appeal of a conditio:; 1 imiting the number of drive-thru lanes.
* TI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
11
12 0 a
g cu 131 $a
0 e
RESOLUTION NO, 6198
A RESOLUTION OF TEIE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF
CAKLSBAD, CALIFORXIA, AFFIRMING A PWNNiNG
COMMISSION DECISION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (CUP-177) FOR A DRIVE-THRU BANKING FACILIT'I
AND APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (77-1(C) )
FOR SAID PROJECT, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DOVE LANE AND EL CAMIN(
REAL AND DENYING THE APPEAL OF A CONDITION LIMIT-
ING THE NUMBER OF DRIVE-THRU LANES. APPLICANT:
LA JOLLA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY.
WHEREAS, on April 23, 1980, the Carlsbad Planning Comm-
adopted Resolution No. 1626 granting Conditional Use Permit
No. 177 and Resolution No. 1627 approving Site Development
NO. 77-1(C), both of which are herewith referred to and mad
a part hereof, for a drive-thru banking facility on propert
generally located on the southeast corner of Dove Lane and
$3 0)
oo+z z &a
9:~; mzjs< 15
u* ,"V 5: gd 1.6
uUN2
1 '1 z? y
aa
>O k 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
o' .Ip l4
>I- u
u
El Camino Real, more particularly described as:
Portion of the western half of the northeast Quarter,
Section 26, Township 12, S. Range 4W., SBM, County of San Diego;
and
I
WHEREAS, said project has been declared to have a non.
Significant impact on the environment and a Negative Decla:
has been prepared and filed in compliance with the require]
of the City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance
1972;
1
WHEREAS: on April 25, 1980, a proper appeal was filed
applicant in protest of the Planning Commission's decision
the number of drive-thru lanes; and
WHEREAS; a duly noticed public hearing was held by th
City Council on May 20, 1980 to consider the appeal at whj
time all persons interested in or opposed to the proposed
I
7 . I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
n 3.2
2 Y g 13
53 Q)
gU-2; 14 z =IT ~EZE 15
m%< ti I UJU
zF86 16 8625 zp Y >+ IT 17 as >
'k 0 18
.a N
+>
- 191
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Plan were heard
and the decision of the Planning Commission considered; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of tl
Ci.ty of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings of the Planning Commission as se
forth in Resolutions No. 1626 and No. 1627 constitute the
findings of the City Council, with the addition of the fcllc
finding:
"The City Council is satisfied that the Traffic Engine€
City staff and Planning Cornmission correctly determined that the site would not safely accommodate a third dril
thru lane. A third lane would result in traffic confli within the shopping center and on the surrounding streets. The site does not afford sufficient space for a third lane and, in any case, the bank would not have the capacity to serve three lanes at once, making
the lane unnecessary. 'I
3.
I
That the appeal of La Jolla Bank and Trust Compan;
the condition imposed by the Planning Commission in Resolut
No. 1626 and No. 1627, limiting the number of drive-thru la]
to two, is hereby denied.
4. That the City Council affirms the Planning Commis
decision contained in Resolutions No. 1626 and No. 1627 sub
to the conditions set forth in said resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of t
City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California on the - 3rd
//I
/// '
///
///
///
2.
I
t
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
D l2
;m Jg 13 e2 Co
y-vuS OL 14 oo=z 2 $5 OEkE
,i I 36
0 a
of June , 1980 by the foll-owing vote, to wit:
AYES :
NOES: None
ASSENT : None
Councilmen Packard, Anear, Lewis, Counci 1 women Cas1 er ai K
/-- r) [/ , 172 &f6 [lc <$k&4:/
+ONALD c . PACKARD , Mayor
ATTEST :
I
G?A*M &&A &! ALETIlA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City C1
(SEa)
I
wo
ZEZS
9 52 >I- y a 17 6 .>
0 18 e_
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
3.
e q
h
INITIAL STUDY SUWNRY ~
DATE : March 3, 1980
TO : James Hagaman, Planning Director
~-___
I FRON : Brian Yilich, Assistant Planner 1’-
SUBJECT: EIR NO. 652; AP4ENDP.IENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REGARDING A DRIVE-THRU BANK
(SDP 77-1 (C) )
DISCUSSION
The applicant is proposing an amendment to a previously
approved Site Development Plan, SDP 77-1. Specifically, the
on the north west corner of the development (West Bluff
Plaza). The changes include a slightly modified building
design, a minor modification to the immediate parkinq area,
and the addition of two drive-thru lanes.
The subject property has been previously graded, and. con-
struction is presently underway on the site. Since the site has been previously disturbed, and no significant environment features exist on the property, no adverse environmental
impacts are anticipated from the proposed project.
RECOMMENDAT ION
It is recommended that a Declaration of Negative Environment;
Impact be issued with regard to the proposed project based
on the following justification:
JUSTIFICATION
---I
applicant is proposing changes to an approved drive-thru bank
-- --__
- _.____
1) The subject property has been previously qraded and development is presently underway.
2) No significant environmental resources exist on the sit€
3) The project is confined to a relatively small area and will not affect any significant environmental resources in the surrounding area.
BPI : ar
3/3/80
0 Q
12N ELM AVENUE TELEPt
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 (714) 72
Eitp of ~ir~~i~ab
NOTICE OF DEXERVINATION
6' - * TO: COUNTY CLERK SECKARY FOR RESOURCES LOG hr>,
County of San Diego 220 West Broadway Room 1311 San Diego, CA 92101 Sacramento, CA 95814
1416 Ninth Street
'.
PXI..JE(X TITLE: SITE DEVEZOPNENT PLAN
PROJECT ADDRESS: Southeast corner of El Camino Real and
I Dove Lane.
PERMIT A~I>LICANT: LA JOLLA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
- - ENVIROl@E\TAL IMPACT OF THE PP,Q3ECT
EJ
WILL hQT HAVE A SIGNIFICAi\FT EFFECT
IVILL/M?iY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT . i. STATUS OF PROJECT
' -. d7D
c3 DENIED
* XN"IR0NmTAL I;"ylFAm REPOKf -
17 PDHE COWLETED PURSUANT TO CEQA
COMPLETED PWUrW TO CEQA
A copy of the d 1 Negative Declaration nlJTR with supporting
U
documents is available for public review at the Plannirlg Department, City fh11,'1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
DATE: JUN 2 4 1988 SIGNED: CK / I
I' ..
I
(li
TE I CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 (71'
e
1200 ELM AVENUE
aitp of UCarZSbab
NEGATIVE DECLAPATION
PRQJEa nm: SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
I
pRWkG mno~: Southeast corner of El Camino Real and Dove Lane -
Fpmzr ~ES~EGH: The applicant is proposing - an anenrkmt to a previously a
Site Develowt Plan, SDP 77-1. Specifically, the applicant is pmpsbg cb
an approved drive-thru bank on the north west comer of the developent (West1
Plaza). The changes include a slightly mdified building design, a minor mdi -
to the irmediate parking area, and the addition of two drive-thru lanes. The ,
proprty has been previously graded, and construction is presently underway on
site. Since the site has been previously disturbed, and no significant enviro
features exist on the property, no adverse envirom-tal impacts are anticipat
- -
- -
-- .-
I_-
L.
- LA JOLLA BANK AlXD TRUST Co?PATSE FFL3Ec.T PI<OF&WV : -
m EO: 652 PERI4ITJF'II.E NO: SDP 77-1(c
The City of Carlsbad h2s caidccted ar- envirmmtd revia7 of the above descTj
pmsait to the Guidelines for hp2m:mtatim of the Califcinta fivirornmital Act ad th.- Environmental koceLtioi-k Ordinace of the CiEy of Ccxlabad. As a sii.ti revis7, a tkaft fkgative I?cclaration (kc1 Lzizt5m of Non-SigniEicznt Imp hz~e5y iszued for the subject project, Justificatlm for LbLs act2.m is on fi
Planning Department,
A ccpy of the l'legative ?kclaration wi-th sqqmrtive doam;mts !is GS file in th: Ikp:~trrmt, City Xdl, 1200 Elm Ave;l;e, Carlsbad, (3. Cmin:nts frcm th:? pfibl:
LzTv5tcd, Please submit ccgvents in writing to the I)laini.ig C~s~~~x? i&36n
days of chte of publication MARCH 8 , 1980
(-p/7 DAl'ED: 7- r;' -fix - SICFED: FP+& :A7-
J cf'n CF c&&&
JP1Vi.E; c. H/Aa>xq. / /TT AGXK r r-m-,
t. ".
NOTICE OF DECLAIIATION
HONS IGN J F I CANT EKVIRONMENTAL IKPACT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Carlsbzd has
issued Negative Declarations for the following projects:
LOG NO. 652: The applicant is proposing an amendment to a
previously approved Site Development Plan,, SDP 77-1.
Specifically, the applicant is proposing changes to an appro drive-thru bank on the northwest corner of the development (West Bluff Plaza). The changes include a slightly modified
building design, a zinor modification to the im.ediate par]<i area, and the addition of two drive-thru lanes. The subject
property has been previously graded, and construction is
previously disturbed, and no significant environmental featv exist on the property, no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated from the proposed project.
APPLICANT: LA JOLLP. BANK AND TRUST CQMPANY
presently underway on the site. Since the site has been
CASE NO: SDP 77-1(C)
A copy of the subject Negative Declarations with supper-
information is avarilable for public revici? at the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad.
fro1-n the public are invited.
writing to the Planning Department within five (5) days from
the date of this notice.
PUBLISH:. MARCH 8, 1980
Cornvents Please submit co1:IEcnts in
'0 e 8"
r(
$*
?
FZE: Qsu.oo ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM
Recelpt No. EIA NO. ,h5; I
Date:
Name of Applicant: La Jolla Bank and Trust Co.
Address : 1205 Prospect Street, La Jolla. CA 92037
permit Applied For: Branch Bank Building
T8 -- / 6 Case Nost: i/
Location of Proposed Activity:
Southeast corner of El Camino Real and Dove Lane
BAC KG ROUN D I hl FO FNAT I ON
lo.. Give a brief description of the proposed activity (att any preliminary development plans) e
Construct a branch bank building in an existing &tail and office shopping center compl ex.
I
2, Describe the activity area, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics; also provide prec slope analysis when appropriate.
This branch bank will be located in an existing retail shopping cer and offices complex,
The slope of the grade is 5% which falls from north to south.'
3. Describe energy conservation measures Incorporated int the design and/or operation sf the project,
Insulation will be installed in roof (R-19) and walls (R-11)-
Double switching will be used for a minimum use of lighting.
Air conditioners will be equipped with economizers.
FORM - 44, Page 1 of 4 PLANNING
, \ I e .e. *.
ENVIRONMCNTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM I
IS. Environmental Impact Analysis
a
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space
Yes - *
a. 1. Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
2, Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value?
Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? -
Could the activity result in the displacement of community resid en t s 3
. ~ 5, Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity
- ..
P
-
3,
4, -
. area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the
e* County, State, or nation?
6. .Could the activity significantly affect a historical or
archaelogical site or its setting? -
.* * To Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural reg-
Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source of water, etc. for rare or endangered wildlife 01; fish species? -
Could the activity significantly affect fish,,wildl ife or plant life? -
Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area?
COUI~ the activity change ex'istinq features sf any.of the city's lagoonsI, bays, or tidelands?
Could the activity change existing features of' any sf the City's beaches? -
Could the activity result in the erssa'on or elimination
of .agricultural lands? s\
Could the activity swve to encouraqe developnicnt of
.presently undevclopcd areas or intensify development of already developed areas? -
- .e ource?
8. - .
9.
10,
11.
32,
-0 -
Y C'
-
13.
14.
-
e.
0 FORM 44, Page 2 of 4 I
0 -
v
! e 'es *. e 'e. -
e 15. - Will the activity require a variance from established environmental
16. Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any local, State or Federal environriiental control
Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional
Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of
\Jill the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood
.yl a i n?
Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? -
klill the activity -invo'ive constructSon of facilities in the area of an active fault? -
Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? --
Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? -
Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other material SI! -
Cmld the activity result in a significant change in the
star,dards (air, water, noise, etc)? -
agency? -
use permit by the City?
potentially hazardous materials? -
17.
A
18.
'19.
20,
s 21.
22.
De.
23.
24,
. 25,
P uality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? 9 Should note surface, ground waterg off-shore) e -
26. ill there be i significant change to existing land form? -
(a) indicate estimated grading to be done a'n cubl'c yards.
o) (b) percentage sf alteration to the present Sand form.
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes,
Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utili sewers, drains or streets? - -27.
IXX o State of No Significant Environnicntal Effects
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section IT but
think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicat reasons bel ow: P
0s . .. ,.
*. .
FO'RM 44. Paae 3 of 4
-1- . e -e 4\
IV: Comncnts or Elaborations to Any of the Questions in Section _- I1
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, at
Signature
0. Date Signed: Jam- 35, [wa
1-
Conclusions (To be completed by the Planning Director). Plac
check in the appropriate box.
( ) Further information is required.
( -1 It has been determined that the project will not have s
environmental effects. ( ) You must submit a prelimi
environmental impact statement by the following date.
( 1 You should make an appointment with the Planning
to discuss further processing of your project, in accorc
Chapter 19.04 sf the Municipal Code,
s.
DATE RECEIVED: -7 <- 4 - 2”, /*.
7
‘ -7 i BY
* .- 1 -9 1072)